DOCSLIB.ORG

BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscripts

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscripts BIBLIOGRAPHY Manuscripts Bodleian Library, Oxford Add. MS C. 303, fols. 67r-73r. more accurate, but incomplete copy of same account of Campion’s trial as BL Add. MS 6265. Rawlinson MS D.1349, item 7. This contains notes on Samuel Harsnet’s notorious anti-Calvinist sermon of 1584 (see Register of Sermons, 63). The Bodleian copy misdates the sermon to 1594. Tanner MS 50. ‘Short and summary nootes of some Sermons preached at Poulls crosse and ells whear not vnprofitable to be remembred.’ The volume contains notes on (39) sermons preached between June 1565 and September 1566, most of them preached at Paul’s Cross. There is much of interest here, particularly on the Jewel/Harding controversy. The original manuscript can’t be consulted because of its condition, but there is a microfilm available, and the Bodleian will make copies of the manuscript from that. Tanner MS 329. incomplete translation of Paolo Bombino, Vita et Martyrium Edmundi Campiani. Twyne MS 17, 157–167. Brian Twyne’s copy of Windsor’s ‘Receavinge of the Quenes Majestie’. British Library Add. MS 6265, fols 14r-22v. Complete copy of unique account of Edmund Campion’s trial on 20 November 1581, which formed basis of Howell’s edition of State Trials, 1816. Add. MS 15891. Letters to Sir Christopher Hatton, mostly printed by Sir Harris Nicolas; letter of Bishop Aylmer to Hatton on subject of John Stubbe, 28 September 1579. Fols. 8r to 9r. Harl. MS 353, fol. 141r-v and Harl. MS 643, fol. 1r-v. Both manuscripts give accounts of the incident in 1553 when there was a riot following Dr Gilbert Bourne’s sermon (see MacLure, Register of Sermons, 34). Harl. MS 417, fol. 129r. vol. 2 of John Foxe’s papers: letter of John Foxe to Bishop Grindal. Harl. MS 422, fols. 136r–172v. vol. 7 of John Foxe’s papers: Copies of Edmund Campion’s last three disputations in the Tower, seized and annotated in house of William Carter by Richard Topcliffe, two veri- fied as in Stephen Vallenger’s hand, and coming from ‘Whyting’ of Lancashire. Harl. MS 425, fols. 131r–133v. ‘Mr [John] Foxe at paules crosse on good frydaye the xxiiith of February Anno 1570. notes gatherde by the parson of St agnes and corrected by master fox.’ This sermon was printed: A sermon of Christ crucified (1570) (see Register of Sermons, 50). See Foxe in 2.3 below. Harl. MS 1714, fol. 140r. ‘Certaine notes collectide out of the Parliament of Christ declaring the enactide and recyvide truthe of the presence of his body and blode in the blessed sacrament impugnide in a wickide sermon by master Juell collected and sett forthe by Thomas Hoskins doctor of divinitie 1566.’. <UN> <UN> 454 bibliography Lansdowne MS 33. Lord Burghley’s papers: Thomas Norton’s notes on last disputation of Campion, no. 61; Oliver Pluckett’s ward-mote for commending Campion, no. 63; drafts of Campion’s indictment, nos. 64 and 65. Sloane MS 2495. ‘Vita Henrici VIII’. Cambridge University Library Add. MS 3117, fols. 160v–168v. Notes on Edwin Sandys’ Paul’s Cross sermon on his becoming bishop of London, taken from the printed edition of Edwin Sandys’ sermons (1585), and written out c. 1630. MS Dd. 5.27. Sermon notes of Robert Ridley. The Parker Library, Corpus Christi College, Cambridge MS 106.175, fol. 487. ‘Letter from the duke of Somerset to Gardiner bishop of Winchester charging him not to meddle with any matter of controversy in his sermon, Syon June 28, 1548.’. MS 106, item 68. Letter of appointment to Paul’s Cross from Dr Haynes to an unknown recipient, undated. MS 114, item 129, fol. 393. ‘Letter from Thomas Cromwell vice-gerent to Mr. Parker dean of Stoke, appointing him to preach at St Paul’s-cross’. MS 114, item 133, fol. 401. ‘Letter from Ridley bishop of London to Dr. Parker, appointing him to preach at St Paul’s- cross, dated 29 July’. MS 114A. Matthew Parker, Correspondence. MS 119, item 14. A letter from Edmund Bonner exhorting members of Cambridge University to preach at Paul’s Cross. MS 127.5, fol. 7. ‘Letter from the duke of Somerset to the bishop of Winchester, repeating his command that he should not treat of the mass nor of other controversial points in his sermon: dated Syon June 28, 1548.’. MS 127.5, fols. 15–30. ‘The sermon of the bishop of Winchester [Stephen Gardiner] before the kings maiestie 29 June 1548, on Matthew XVI.13.’. MS 257. Miles Windsor, ‘An. Dni 1566. The Receavinge of the Quenes Majestie into Oxford’. fols. 104r–114r (fair copy, autograph); fols 115r–123r (draft, autograph with revisions). MS 583. A parchment role relating to Matthew Parker’s career. The Folger Shakespeare Library, Washington, DC MS V.a.109. fols 1r–21r. John Bereblock, Commentarii sive Ephemerae actiones rerum illustrium Oxonii gestarum in adventu Serenissimae Principis Elizabethae. MS V.a.176. Bishop Robinson’s copy of Miles Windsor’s ‘A Brief Rehearsall’. MS V.a. 251. ‘A sermon preached at St Paules crosse the firste of June 1606, by John Dove, Doctour of Divinitye … of the Kinges prærogative.’. <UN> <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/5tv2w736 Author Harkins, Robert Lee Publication Date 2013 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief.
    [Show full text]
  • The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Roman Catholic
    Andrews University Seminary Studies, Summer 1985, Vol. 23, No. 2, 161-180. Copyright @ 1985 by Andrews University Press. THE EXEGETICAL METHODS OF SOME SIXTEENTH- CENTURY ROMAN CATHOLIC PREACHERS IN ENGLAND: FISHER, PERYN, BONNER, AND WATSON PART I ERWIN R. GANE Angwin, California 94508 In earlier articles, I have explored the exegetical methods of representative Anglican and Puritan preachers and also of late medieval sermons.' This article and a subsequent one will be devoted to the exegetical methods displayed in sermons of four Roman Catholic preachers in England who flourished in the six- teenth century: John Fisher (1469-l535), William Peryn (d. 1558), Edmund Bonner (l5OO?-l569), and Thomas Watson (1518- 1584). A major question is the extent to which the biblical exegesis and other homiletical concerns identify these preachers as being medi- eval or Renaissance oriented. Are they, for example, more akin to the medieval preachers or to the Anglican preachers we have dealt with in the earlier studies? The presentation that follows will of necessity first give an overview of the careers of these four preachers, noting the historical setting in which their preaching took place. Then, attention will be given to their specific exegetical techniques and homiletical concerns. 1. Overview of the Careers of the Preachers John Fisher John Fisher received his first degree at Michaelhouse, Cam- bridge, in 1483 at the age of fourteen, was appointed master in 1497, '"The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Anglican Preachers: Latimer, Jewel, Hooker, and Andrewes," Parts I and 11, AUSS 17 (1979):23-38, 169- 188; "The Exegetical Methods of Some Sixteenth-Century Puritan Preachers: Hooper, Cartwright, and Perkins," Parts I and 11, AUSS 19 (1981): 21-36, 99-114; "Late-Medieval Sermons in England: An Analysis of Fourteenth- and Fifteenth- Century Preaching." A USS 20 (1982): 179-203.
    [Show full text]
  • DISSERTATION-Submission Reformatted
    The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 By Robert Lee Harkins A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair Professor Jonathan Sheehan Professor David Bates Fall 2013 © Robert Lee Harkins 2013 All Rights Reserved 1 Abstract The Dilemma of Obedience: Persecution, Dissimulation, and Memory in Early Modern England, 1553-1603 by Robert Lee Harkins Doctor of Philosophy in History University of California, Berkeley Professor Ethan Shagan, Chair This study examines the problem of religious and political obedience in early modern England. Drawing upon extensive manuscript research, it focuses on the reign of Mary I (1553-1558), when the official return to Roman Catholicism was accompanied by the prosecution of Protestants for heresy, and the reign of Elizabeth I (1558-1603), when the state religion again shifted to Protestantism. I argue that the cognitive dissonance created by these seesaw changes of official doctrine necessitated a society in which religious mutability became standard operating procedure. For most early modern men and women it was impossible to navigate between the competing and contradictory dictates of Tudor religion and politics without conforming, dissimulating, or changing important points of conscience and belief. Although early modern theologians and polemicists widely declared religious conformists to be shameless apostates, when we examine specific cases in context it becomes apparent that most individuals found ways to positively rationalize and justify their respective actions. This fraught history continued to have long-term effects on England’s religious, political, and intellectual culture.
    [Show full text]
  • '[A] Litle Treatyse in Prynte and Euen in the English Tongue': Appeals to The
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 5-2010 ‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation Bradley C. Pardue University of Tennessee - Knoxville, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss Part of the Intellectual History Commons Recommended Citation Pardue, Bradley C., "‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation. " PhD diss., University of Tennessee, 2010. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_graddiss/733 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a dissertation written by Bradley C. Pardue entitled "‘[A] litle treatyse in prynte and euen in the english tongue’: Appeals to the Public during the Early Years of the English Reformation." I have examined the final electronic copy of this dissertation for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, with a major in History. Robert J Bast, Major Professor We have read this dissertation and recommend its acceptance: Thomas Burman, Palmira Brummett, Heather Hirschfeld Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R.
    [Show full text]
  • Popular Prophecy in Sixteenth-Century England
    !o-b- t-l POPULAR PROPHECY IN SIXTEENTH. CENTURY ENGLAND : BY MOUTH AND PEN IN THE ATEHOUSE AND FROM THE PULPIT Frances M. Gladwin Department of History Thesis presented as requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophyin the Faculry of Arrs, University of Ade*aide Ma¡ch 1992. 1l CONTENTS Abstract Abb¡eviatiorrs --.....- ...--.ix 1 INTRODUCTION L PART ONE: The Definition of Prophecy Chapter One Modern Commentators z3 Chapter Two Tudor Prophets andMethods of Prophesying..---. ....-,--...45 Chapter Three The Prophecies 68 PART TWO: The Atøck on Prophecy Chapter Four Literary Opponenrs of Prophecy 89 Chapter Five Legislarive Opposition to Prophecy and Merhods of Prosecurion 120 PART THREE: The Transmission of Prophecy and the Participants Chapter Six The Transmission of Prophecy 152 Chapter Seven Parricipants: The Nobiliry t74 Chapter Eight Participanrs: The Clergy z0z Chapter Nine Participants: The Common People 228 111 CONCLUSION 257 Appendix One S tatutory I-e gi sl ation Under \(¡hich Judici al Authorities'Were Able to Prosecute Prophesiers 276 Appendix Two Sixteenth.Century Statutes Against Prophecy 278 Appendix Three Genealogical Chart of the Stafford Family 284 Appendix Four Genealogical Chart of the Pole Famíly 285 Appendix Five Genealogical Chart of the Howard Family 286 BIBLIOGRAPI{Y 287 GLOSSARY 338 ERRATA p.47 Lines 13 and 14 for "Pankhurst" read "Parkhurst". t'Foxe". p.48 Line 17 for "Fox" read p,74 Line 5 for "Stn/rre" read "Styrre". p,93 Líne 2 for " 1588 " read " 1583 ". p,123 Line 11 for "1558" read "1559". p, 156 Line 8 for "cardinal of York" read "archbishop of York" p.
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Elizabethans. P.1: Church; P.2: Law Officers
    Prominent Elizabethans. p.1: Church; p.2: Law Officers. p.3: Miscellaneous Officers of State. p.5: Royal Household Officers. p.7: Privy Councillors. p.9: Peerages. p.11: Knights of the Garter and Garter ceremonies. p.18: Knights: chronological list; p.22: alphabetical list. p.26: Knights: miscellaneous references; Knights of St Michael. p.27-162: Prominent Elizabethans. Church: Archbishops, two Bishops, four Deans. Dates of confirmation/consecration. Archbishop of Canterbury. 1556: Reginald Pole, Archbishop and Cardinal; died 1558 Nov 17. Vacant 1558-1559 December. 1559 Dec 17: Matthew Parker; died 1575 May 17. 1576 Feb 15: Edmund Grindal; died 1583 July 6. 1583 Sept 23: John Whitgift; died 1604. Archbishop of York. 1555: Nicholas Heath; deprived 1559 July 5. 1560 Aug 8: William May elected; died the same day. 1561 Feb 25: Thomas Young; died 1568 June 26. 1570 May 22: Edmund Grindal; became Archbishop of Canterbury 1576. 1577 March 8: Edwin Sandys; died 1588 July 10. 1589 Feb 19: John Piers; died 1594 Sept 28. 1595 March 24: Matthew Hutton; died 1606. Bishop of London. 1553: Edmund Bonner; deprived 1559 May 29; died in prison 1569. 1559 Dec 21: Edmund Grindal; became Archbishop of York 1570. 1570 July 13: Edwin Sandys; became Archbishop of York 1577. 1577 March 24: John Aylmer; died 1594 June 5. 1595 Jan 10: Richard Fletcher; died 1596 June 15. 1597 May 8: Richard Bancroft; became Archbishop of Canterbury 1604. Bishop of Durham. 1530: Cuthbert Tunstall; resigned 1559 Sept 28; died Nov 18. 1561 March 2: James Pilkington; died 1576 Jan 23. 1577 May 9: Richard Barnes; died 1587 Aug 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Inappropriate Patterns for Children Database Discoveries – Contribution # 8 Transferware Collectors Club Judie Siddall Decembe
    Inappropriate Patterns for Children Database Discoveries – Contribution # 8 Transferware Collectors Club Judie Siddall December 2012 Children haven’t changed in the past two hundred years, but the concept of childhood and what is appropriate for children has changed. Nineteenth century British children’s mugs and plates were created as inexpensive gifts or rewards to teach religion and the alphabet as well as to delight with pictures of animals and children’s activities. However, some of the patterns found on this pottery are frightening! Below are patterns that fit the inappropriate or frightening category. The first pattern, Seal Hunt (Figures 1A & 1B), which was made by Thomas Elsmore & Son (1872-1887), illustrates seal hunting. The molded alphabet border does aid in learning the alphabet, but the hunters who are clubbing the seals would be deemed inappropriate and frightening today. The next pattern (Figures 2A & 2B) “The Romish Bishop Bonner”, which was made by Powell & Bishop (1876-1878), is an odd choice for a child even though it was intended to teach a religious history lesson. Perhaps this pattern was a reward for doing well in Sunday School. Substitute the word Catholic for Romish, as the history lesson is about Bishop Edmund Bonner (ca. 1500 to 1569) who served during the reigns of Henry VIII, Edward VI and Mary I, known as Bloody Mary. Actually, Bonner was known as Bloody Bonner. He was able to survive quite awhile during the enormous upheaval of the English Reformation, as he changed his ideas about religion (Catholic, Protestant, Catholic) to that of the reigning monarch.
    [Show full text]
  • Bishop Bonner and the English Schism
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Master's Theses Theses and Dissertations 1945 Bishop Bonner and the English Schism Edward Joseph Dunne Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Dunne, Edward Joseph, "Bishop Bonner and the English Schism" (1945). Master's Theses. 159. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_theses/159 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. Copyright © 1945 Edward Joseph Dunne ~ Blshop Bonner and the English Sehls. E4war4 Joseph Dunne, S.M. A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fultlllment ot the Requlrements tor the Degree ot Master ot Art. ln Loyola Universlty Vlta Edward Joseph Dunne was born ln Peorla, Illinois, January 27, 1910. He attended Spalding Instltute in Peoria, and Karyhurst Normal, Kirkwood, Missourl, and entered the Soclety ot Mary ln 1927. The Bachelor of Arts degree with a major ln History was conterred by St. Mary's University ot San AntoniO, Texas, in 1932. Graduate work in History was also taken at St. Lou1s University from 1934 to 1937. S1nce 19~2, the writ~r has taught 1n the schools ot the Society ot Mary in St. Louis, Klssour1, and ln East St. Louis, Bellevl11e, and Chicago, Il11nols. BIBLIOGRAPHY 1. SOURCE MATERIAL Calendar ot Letters, Dlspatches and State papers! relating to the NegotIatIons between England and Spain, eltea by a.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Prominent Elizabethans
    Prominent Elizabethans. p.1: Church; p.2: Law Officers. p.3: Miscellaneous Officers of State. p.5: Royal Household Officers. p.7: Privy Councillors. p.9: Peerages. p.11: Knights of the Garter and Garter ceremonies. p.18: Knights: chronological list; p.22: alphabetical list. p.26: Knights: miscellaneous references; Knights of St Michael. p.27-162: Prominent Elizabethans. Church: Archbishops, two Bishops, four Deans. Dates of confirmation/consecration. Archbishop of Canterbury. 1556: Reginald Pole, Archbishop and Cardinal; died 1558 Nov 17. Vacant 1558-1559 December. 1559 Dec 17: Matthew Parker; died 1575 May 17. 1576 Feb 15: Edmund Grindal; died 1583 July 6. 1583 Sept 23: John Whitgift; died 1604. Archbishop of York. 1555: Nicholas Heath; deprived 1559 July 5. 1560 Aug 8: William May elected; died the same day. 1561 Feb 25: Thomas Young; died 1568 June 26. 1570 May 22: Edmund Grindal; became Archbishop of Canterbury 1576. 1577 March 8: Edwin Sandys; died 1588 July 10. 1589 Feb 19: John Piers; died 1594 Sept 28. 1595 March 24: Matthew Hutton; died 1606. Bishop of London. 1553: Edmund Bonner; deprived 1559 May 29; died in prison 1569. 1559 Dec 21: Edmund Grindal; became Archbishop of York 1570. 1570 July 13: Edwin Sandys; became Archbishop of York 1577. 1577 March 24: John Aylmer; died 1594 June 5. 1595 Jan 10: Richard Fletcher; died 1596 June 15. 1597 May 8: Richard Bancroft; became Archbishop of Canterbury 1604. Bishop of Durham. 1530: Cuthbert Tunstall; resigned 1559 Sept 28; died Nov 18. 1561 March 2: James Pilkington; died 1576 Jan 23. 1577 May 9: Richard Barnes; died 1587 Aug 24.
    [Show full text]
  • Voynich Manuscript (The “Book of Dunstan”) Coding and Decoding Methods
    Voynich Manuscript (The “Book of Dunstan”) coding and decoding methods. Alexander G. Ulyanenkov, [email protected] © 2016 Alexander Ulyanenkov (Александр Ульяненков). All rights (inc. also code location, identification, decoding, translation etc.) – reserved. (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0) Abstract: The Voynich manuscript (VMS) is the book dated as 15th - 16th century, written using specific and smart coding methods. This article describes the methods how it was analyzed and how coding keys were found. It also shows the VMS author’s method of coding. Keywords: Voynich manuscript, code, codes, coding, decoding, decipher, VMS, key, Kelley, Kelly, Dee, John Dee, Trithemij, Trithemius, Dunstan, Book of Dunstan. 1. Introduction This is an ancient manuscript, familiar to many researchers of medieval riddles under the names "Voynich Manuscript" (also known in abbreviation – VMS, which I will use in the article), it was also called "The book, which no one can read," because neither the language used for writing it or its author, nor place, nor even the date of writing was unknown. Its current name the manuscript received from the name of one of the last owners - Michael Voynich (1865 -1930) - Polish revolutionary (pseudonym "Wilfred"), bibliophile and antiquarian, husband of well known writer Ethel Lilian Voynich. Voynich acquired the mysterious manuscript for his collection in 1912. And although that did not affected the success in deciphering the manuscript, but finally influenced its future fate - in 1959 Voynich family heirs sold it to bookseller Hans Kraus, who in 1969 gave it to Yale University Benecke rare book library , where it is still being held. 1 On the official website of Benecke library of rare books of Yale University [1] the manuscript description is the following: Call Number: Beinecke MS 408 (Request the physical item to view in our reading room) Alternate Title: Voynich Manuscript Date: [ca.
    [Show full text]
  • English Law and the Renaissance, by Frederic William Maitland
    The Project Gutenberg EBook of English Law and the Renaissance, by Frederic William Maitland This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you are not located in the United States, you'll have to check the laws of the country where you are located before using this ebook. Title: English Law and the Renaissance The Rede Lecture for 1901 Author: Frederic William Maitland Release Date: February 27, 2017 [EBook #54251] Language: English Character set encoding: UTF-8 *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ENGLISH LAW AND THE RENAISSANCE *** Produced by Clarity and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team at http://www.pgdp.net (This file was produced from images generously made available by The Internet Archive/Canadian Libraries) English Law and the Renaissance London: C. J. CLAY AND SONS, CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS WAREHOUSE, AVE MARIA LANE, AND STEVENS AND SONS, LTD, 119 AND 120, CHANCERY LANE. Glasgow: 50, WELLINGTON STREET. Leipzig: F. A. BROCKHAUS. New York: THE MACMILLAN COMPANY. Bombay: E. SEYMOUR HALE. [All Rights reserved.] English Law and the Renaissance (The Rede Lecture for 1901) with some Notes by Frederic William Maitland, LL.D., Hon. D.C.L., of Lincoln’s Inn, Barrister-at-Law, Downing Professor of the Laws of England in the University of Cambridge CAMBRIDGE at the University Press 1901 Cambridge: PRINTED BY J.
    [Show full text]
  • The Essex Family Historian Edition – December 2020 No
    THE ESSEX FAMILY HISTORIAN Journal of The Essex Society for Family History www.esfh.org.uk Edition No 172 December 2020 Essex Society for Family History For full information about the Society, please visit our website - www.esfh.org.uk At this time all our branch meetings are held online and open to all members. (see pages 7&8). We are still operating a Research Service (see page 48) however our Research Library at the Essex Record Office is closed until further notice. Membership Rates Annual membership of the Society runs from 1st April until 31st March. For rates see table below or our website. For membership payment details please see our website or page 48:- Membership Category Fees Payable Fees Payable (Paper Magazine) (Electronic Magazine) Single Member living in UK £16.00 £8.00 Institutional Member £18.00 £8.00 Single Member living outside UK £25.00 £8.00 Benefits of membership include:- l The Society has a Research Centre located at the Essex Record Office with an extensive collection of material that is useful to family historians. l Access to the ESFH Members only area of the website where members can find valuable data including in excess of 1.9 million genealogical records which are increased regularly. l Receipt of the H�������� publication 3 times per year in March, August and December. l Capability to view or download from our website the latest issue of the H�������� and copies of publications issued by other family history societies. l Access to an archive with a selection of back numbers of the H��������.
    [Show full text]