<<

Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 Resistance of Castanea Clones to Cinnamomi: Testing and Genetic Control

By M. E. MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA1), J. FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ1), A. M. VETTRAINO2) and A. VANNINI2)

(Received 23th May 2005)

Summary hybrid clone forest reproduction material for The resistance of chestnut clones to Phytophthora cin- commercial use in Spain must be approved as belonging namomi was evaluated by a soil inoculation experiment to qualified or controlled categories, and its value must under controlled environmental conditions, as well as by be demonstrated according to the requirements outlined excised and intact stem tests. One-year-old plants of in Directive 1999/105/EC (EUROPEAN COUNCIL, 1999) and fifty different clones were inoculated with two isolates of RD 289/2003 (BOLETIN OFICIAL DEL ESTADO, 2003). For Phytophthora cinnamomi and evaluated fourteen weeks successful wood production in Atlantic areas, stem qual- after inoculation. There were significant differences ity and growth as well as a certain level of resistance to among clones for all root and collar rot variables. There Phytophthora sp. are used as selection criteria. While were significant differences for isolates of P. cinnamomi the first two traits can be assessed in field trials, evalu- but only for the collar rot variables. A total of 84% of ation of resistance in terms of survival is not straightfor- plants grown in infested soil showed symptoms of root rot but only 50% of the plants with root rot, showed also ward, as it is difficult to differentiate the different fac- had collar rot. The roots of resistant clones were able to tors related to survival in the field. confine the colonization, in roots and from roots to col- Different methods have been developed for screening lar. Percentage circumference of collar rot was the best the resistance of chestnut trees to Phytophthora sp. by indicator or descriptor of sensitivity, a 50% of clones using either intact seedlings (SANTINI et al., 2003; VET- were resistant or highly resistant clones, with respec- TRAINO et al., 2001a) or excised stems from seedlings or tively less than 20% and than 10% circumference of col- clones (FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ et al., 2001; SALESSES et al., lar rot. Percentage of survival of plants is not sufficient 1993b; RAMOS GUEDES-LAFARGUE and SALESSES, 1998; to indicate resistance to the pathogen, as mortality may be affected by environmental conditions or by other VETTRAINO et al., 2001b). The variable used in intact or pathogens. The clonal heritability of collar rot variables excised stem inoculation tests is the length of lesion ranged between 0.54 and 0.71. The plants grown on after inoculation (SALESSES et al., 1993b; RAMOS GUEDES- inoculated soil showed a reduction in growth. The phe- LAFARGUE and SALESSES, 1998; FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ et al., notypic and genotypic correlations between soil infesta- 2001; SANTINI et al., 2003; VETTRAINO et al., 2001a, tion characteristics and the length of necrosis in both 2001b). The variables used in the soil infestation test intact and excised stem tests were positive and highly are “health status of the plants (scale of 0–4)” and per- significant and indicated similar resistance rankings of centage of necrotized roots after carrying out a soil the clones. infestation test (VETTRAINO et al., 2001b; SANTINI et al., Key words: Chestnut, ink disease resistance, heritability, phe- 2003). Other qualitative and quantitative characters notypic and genotypic correlations, root collar rot, correlation were assessed by VETTRAINO et al. (2001a), such as stem test. growth in height, number of leaves, dry weight, length of the stem and root necroses, crown condition and mor- Introduction tality. Excised stem inoculation is the main method used to Phytophthora cinnamomi is an introduced pathogen test the resistance of chestnut clones to Phytophthora associated with the mortality in European chestnut cinnamomi, but this method is criticized because the trees ( Miller) growing on acid soils in results have not been shown to be clearly correlated the humid climate of northwestern Spain. This fungus with the results obtained in the soil inoculation test. causes ink disease, characterized by root and collar rot, Studies with species such as (ROBIN and DESPREZ- usually followed by death of the trees. Clonal forestry LOUSTAU, 1998, 2001) and Eucalyptus (TIPPET et al., for wood production has been promoted in the Atlantic 1985) have shown that the stem and root inoculation are coastal area of Galicia (NW Spain), with Euroasiatic closely correlated in terms of relative resistance rank- hybrid clones, mainly x C. sativa. The ings. resistance of these hybrids to Phytophthora sp. is usual- ly higher than that of Castanea sativa, but there is vari- The overall aim of the present study was to select ability among different inter-specific hybrid genotypes clones with high levels of resistance to Phytophthora (VIEITEZ, 1960; SCHAD et al., 1952). cinnamomi, which are able to survive on infected soils and therefore can be recommended as forest reproduc- tion materials. The specific aims were: 1) to find useful 1 ) Centro de Investigacións Forestais e Ambientais de Lourizán. indicator variables for screening resistant clones in a Departamento de Producción Forestal. Xunta de Galicia. Apdo 127, 36080. Pontevedra, Spain. E-mail: memiranda.cifal@ soil inoculation experiment; 2) to assess the resistance siam-cma.org of chestnut clones; 3) to compare the rankings of resis- 2) Department of Plant Protection, University of Studies of tance of chestnut clones resulting from the soil infesta- Tuscia, Via S. Camillo de Lellis, 01100 Viterbo, Italy. tion test and excised and intact stem tests.

Silvae Genetica 56, 1 (2007) 11

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 Materials and Methods Three plants per isolate were selected to reisolate P. Plant material cinnamomi at the end of experiment, as described by THEMANN and WERRES (1998, www.bba.de/phytoph/ Fifty chestnut clones were selected in field trials by diagn_r.htm). growth and crown form (FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, 1996) and their genealogical origin determined using diagnostic Experiment design isozyme loci of chestnut species (FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, 1996): 44 clones are hybrids between Castanea crenata The trial consisted of five blocks or plots (1–5) with Sieb. et Zucc. x C. sativa Mill., one clone is a hybrid three treatments per plot/block (control (Cont), P. cinna- between Castanea mollissima Blume x C. sativa Mill. momi Lourizán (PcL) and P. cinnamomi Sigras (PcS)). Each of the fifteen block-treatment combinations was a (URQUIJO, 1956; VIEITEZ, 1960) (clone 7521), four clones belong to the species Castanea sativa Mill. (clones 3205, complete randomized design including one plant for 130, 90.042 and MARA) and one is a Castanea crenata each one of 50 clones. Fifteen plants per clone were ini- Sieb. et Zucc. clone (2091). The French hybrid clone (CA- tially used for the test, so there were 5 replicates per 15) (SALESSES et al., 1993a, 1993b) and the Spanish clone per treatment. Some plants died during prepara- hybrid clones (111 and 2073) (FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ et al., tion of the test, thus, the mean number of plants per 2001) were used as resistant controls. The Spanish clone and treatment was 4,56 and the design of the test hybrid clones (110 and 125) were used as less resistant was unbalanced. A total of 440 plants were finally tested controls (FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ et al., 2001). for the presence of P. cinnamomi coming from inocula- tion with PcL and PcS isolations, at the end of the The chestnut clones were propagated from cuttings experiment. during June and July 2002 and planted in plastic pots (4L) in February 2003. The plants were grown in a In addition to the soil inoculation experiment, two greenhouse at 23 ± 3°C in a mixed substrate (50% per- tests were carried out: the first experiment consisted on lite, 25% peat and 25% composted sterilized pine bark) the inoculation on the apex of excised stem of fifty one fertilized with Osmocote plus. Plants of mean height chestnut clones (33 common clones to soil inoculation 41.03 ± 21.8 cm and mean diameter 5.69 ± 1.87 mm test), using three treatments (control (without inocu- were used for the test at the end of May 2003. lum) and two isolates of P. cinnamomi (PcL and PcS)), in controlled environmental conditions in greenhouse and Isolation, identification and culture of Phytophthora with stems collected in June (spring) and October cinnamomi (autumn) (MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA et al., 2007). The second Soil samples containing diseased chestnut roots were trial consisted on the inoculation on the apex of intact collected at two chestnut sites on the coast of Galicia plant stem of thirty clones (20 common clones to soil (northwest Spain): the nursery of the Centro de Investi- inoculation test), using two treatments (control (without gacións Forestais e Ambientais de Lourizán (L) and the inoculum) and one isolate of P. cinnamomi (PcL), in Sigrás orchard (S). Two isolates of Phytophthora cin- June (MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA and FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, 2005). namomi were obtained and identified as belonging to In these tests, the length of lesions produced after 14 mating type A2 (VETTRAINO et al., 2001, 2005). The iso- and 21 days was used as an indicator of P. cinnamomi lates designated P. cinnamomi Lourizán (PcL) and resistance; also survival after 14, 21 and 28 days was P. cinnamomi Sigrás (PcS), were maintained on carrot- recorded in the second trial. Analyses of variance were agar (CA) in Petri-plates at 20°C in darkness (BRASIER, applied to the results to study the effects of genotype, 1969), and subcultured at 4-week intervals (VETTRAINO the isolates of P. cinnamomi and the interaction et al., 2001). The isolates were repassaged through between genotype and isolates, in the first trial; and to chestnut micropropagated plants four weeks prior to the study the effects of genotype, the treatment (control and test as a precautionary measure against loss of patho- isolate) and the interaction between genotype and treat- genicity through continuous subculturing (ERWIN and ment, in the first and second trials. The length of necro- RIBEIRO, 1996; HUBERLI et al., 2001). The age of culture sis after 14 days in autumn showed values that ranged of both isolates was therefore the same. between 1.7 cm and 8.8 cm from the most resistant to Phytophthora inocula were prepared for soil infesta- the most susceptible clone, in excised stem test. A con- tion by growing isolates on sterilized millet seeds: 100 g tinuous range of resistance-susceptibility levels among sterilized millet seeds were placed in a jar and then clones was obtained in these tests. The rankings of moistened with 200 ml carrot juice (200 gr carrot on resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi obtained in these 800 ml distilled water) as described by VETTRAINO et al. tests were compared with the rankings obtained in the (2001). The jars of millet were divided into three groups soil inoculation test. for three treatments: PcL (for inoculation with P. cin- namomi Lourizán), PcS (for inoculation with P. cin- Inoculation namomi Sigrás) and Control (without inoculum). For The plants were watered to field capacity by subirriga- preparing PcL and PcS, half a Petri-plate (9 cm) of tion prior to the test and inoculated at the end of May inoculum was cut and added, mycelia side down, to the 2003. The inoculum was added at a rate of 20 ml inocu- millet seeds. To prepare the control treatment, half a lum per 1000 ml soil mix (VETTRAINO et al., 2001) (60 ml Petri-plate of carrot-agar with no inoculum was added to per pot). Four small holes were made in the substrate the millet. The jars of millet with isolates were incubat- close to the pot, taking care to avoid damaging the roots. ed during three weeks at 24 ± 1°C in the dark in a The inoculum was placed in the holes and covered with growth chamber. substrate. Controls were inoculated with sterile millet.

12

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 The pots with the soil mixture, plants and inoculum – Localized lesions of length less than 2 cm. These were flooded for 24 hours (VETTRAINO et al., 2001) by lesions only occur in a few large or small roots. Value 3. placing the pots in larger buckets to maintain the water – Large roots with few lesions of less than 2.5 cm and level 1–2 cm above the surface of the soil, as described with little lesions. Value 4 by BROWNE and MIRCETICH (1988). During the following – All large and small roots have abundant expanding weeks the plants were maintained in a controlled- lesions of more than 2.5 cm along with many little - environment greenhouse (temperature 23 ± 3°C, high small lesions in all large roots. Value 5. humidity supplied with a fog-press system) and subirri- A scale of resistance was defined on the basis of the 6 gated for 1h every other day. Fourteen weeks after inoc- categories described, allowing classification of the clones ulation, plants were examined to evaluate their resis- by the mean value obtained (Table 1). tance to the pathogen. • Percentage Circumference of collar rot: This symp- Variables tom was assessed by visual estimation of the lateral The variables assessed in each plant during and at the extent of lesion around the circumference of the collar in end of the test were initially based on those proposed by each plant, as between 0 (healthy) and 100 (100% cir- BROWNE and MIRCETICH (1993), VETTRAINO et al. (2001) cumference of collar rot). A scale of resistance-suscepti- and VANNINI and VETTRAINO (2002): bility was then defined on the basis of the range of percentage circumference of collar rot (allowing classifi- Survival of plants: The percentages were calculated cation of the clones by the mean value obtained (Table from plants died during the test. The plants that died 1)). This variable shows the capacity of plant of confin- before and immediately after inoculation and flooding ing the pathogen in roots or the pathogen spread widely (during the first days of the test) was recorded and the to stem. plants were examined for the presence of rot symptoms. • Collar rot length: the vertical length of collar rot Visual symptoms of root or collar rot in plants associ- lesion on the stem was measured with a digital caliper, ated with Phytophthora infection. To verify in each to the nearest mm. A scale of resistance was defined plant, the presence of brown to dark brown areas in col- (Table 1) on the basis of the length of the lesions in cm, lar and roots, portions of bark were removed with a allowing classification of the clones according to the scalpel. The assessment of lesions is based on their fre- mean value obtained. This variable shows the capacity quency, level and size: of plant of confining the pathogen in roots or the • Root rot percentage, Collar rot percentage: The per- pathogen spread widely to stem. centages were calculated from plants with presence (1) Other non-specific variables: or non- presence (0) and were calculated separately for clones and for treatments. • Leaf persistence from the collar to the apex at the end of the test. Visual scale, from 0 to 10, based on the • Level of root rot and scale of resistance: The level of lesions was assessed in each plant on the basis of 6 cate- percentage of stem with leaves. gories; each assigned a value of between 0 and 5, allow- • Height growth, collar growth of plants measured ing quantitative evaluation of a qualitative character. during the test: height in cm, diameter in mm. – No visible symptoms. May be resistant to penetra- • Dry weight aboveground portion, dry weight under- tion. Value 0. ground portion of each plant in g, after drying 24 hours – Less than 10 small localized lesions, of length less at 80°C. than 0.5 cm. These small lesions only occur in a few large or small roots. Value 1. Data Analysis – Confined lesions of length between 0.5 and 1 cm. Analyses of variance were applied to the results to These lesions only occur in a few large or small roots. study the effects of genotype, the treatment (i.e. experi- Value 2. mental inoculation with isolates of P. cinnamomi) and

Table 1. – Level of resistance-susceptibility and classification of clones according to the mean clonal value obtained in Student–Newman-Keuls test of level of root rot, percentage circumference of collar rot and collar rot length.

13

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 the interaction between genotype and treatments, using Phenotypic and Genotypic correlations: Pearson’s phe- the following mixed model: notypic correlation coefficients were calculated to evalu- ate the strength of the relationship between traits in the Xijk = µ + Ci + Tj + C*Tij + k(ij) (1) soil infestation test as well as between traits from soil infestation test and the length of necrosis from excised Where: C: Clone (i = 50), T: Treatment (j = 3) or Isolate and intact stem tests (PROC CORR). (j = 2), C*T: Interaction between Clones and Treatments or Isolates, : Residual effect. Type A genotypic correlations were estimated as Treatment was considered as a fixed factor and clone described by BRIDGEWATER (1992) to study the correla- was considered as a random factor. tions of the different traits measured in the same plants. The genetic correlation between two traits (x and To evaluate the efficiency of experimental inoculation y) (r ) is obtained by dividing the genetic covariance with P. cinnamomi, an initial analysis was carried out gAxy (Cov ) by the product of the genetic standard devia- with the three treatments (including the control, PcL gxy tions: and PcS). To estimate clonal variability in resistance to P. cinnamomi and differences between Phytophthora cinnamomi isolates, the same analysis of variance was applied, but excluding data from the control treatment. A Student-Newman-Keuls test was used to obtain The standard deviations were obtained by taking the groups of homogeneous treatments and clones. To study square root of the product of the genetic variances of the the distribution of the variability among different two traits. factors, variance components were calculated using the Type B Genotypic correlations were estimated mean square values and corresponding expected mean between pairs of traits from the soil infestation test and square coefficients generated from PROC GLM, from the excised and intact stem tests to compare the RANDOM/test option (SAS Inc., 1989). For all analyses, rankings of resistance. Type B genetic correlations were the sources of variation were considered significant at estimated using the method of BURDON (1977): = 5%. 2 Clonal heritabilities (H c) were calculated as:

Where rse is the phenotypic correlation between genet- ic group means in the soil test “s” and stem test “e”, and

HCs and HCe are square-roots of heritabilities of the genetic group means in soil test “s” and stem test “e”, Where 2 , 2 , 2 are variances due to clones, C C*T e respectively. interaction of clones and treatments and error variance, and R and T are the number of replicates and treat- ments. Results and Discussion The standard errors of clonal heritabilities were Effect of isolate of P. cinnamomi and genotype on root obtained by the formula given by FALCONER (1989): and collar rot No symptoms associated with Phytophthora were observed in the roots or collar of the control plants (no treatment). A total of 84% of plants grown in infested Where n and N are the mean number of individuals soil showed symptoms of root rot (Table 2). Figure 1 per clone and mean number of clones, respectively. shows chestnut plant with collar and root rot.

Table 2. – Influence of clone, isolate of P. cinnamomi and clone-isolate interaction on collar and root rot. Mean squares with significant levels of the analysis of variance. Mean values of both the most resistant (Resist.) and the most sensible (Sens.) clone, overall mean values with their standard devia- 2 tions (SD) and Clonal heritabilities (H c) with their standard errors (S).

ns = P > 0.05; * = P > 0.01; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.

14

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21

Figure 3. – Number of clones grouped according to the observed percentage of plants showing root rot within the individual clones.

(Table 3): one third of clones (16 clones) were classified as resistant to spreading of pathogen in roots, most of Figure 1. – Chestnut plant with collar and root rot. these plants showed confined, small lesions in a few roots. Forty two percent of the clones (21 clones) were partially resistant and showed localized lesions of 0.5 to 2 cm in some large and small roots. One fifth of the clones (10 clones) were susceptible, showing large and small lesions in all large roots. Only three clones were highly susceptible to spreading of pathogen in roots, showing abundant expanding lesions of more than 2.5 cm accompanied by many small lesions in all large roots. Two of these highly susceptible clones were hybrid clones (125 and 3U) and one was the C. sativa clone (3205) (Table 3). Considering all clones, some 44% of plants grown in infested soil showed collar rot (Table 2). Therefore only Figure 2. – Effect of Treatment, P. cinnamomi Lourizán (PcL) and P. cinnamomi Sigras (PcS), on percentage of plants with 50% of the plants with root rot, showed also had collar collar root (% of plants), percentage circumference of collar rot rot. In only one clone none of the 10 plants showed (% of circumference) and length of collar rot in centimetres symptoms of collar rot. The remaining 49 clones had col- (Length in cm). lar rot, but the number of plants of each clone showing symptoms varied, ranging between 10% and 100% (Fig- ure 4). For most clones, collar rot was observed in 50% Analyses of variance revealed significant differences of the plants, in one clone (clone 90.025) collar rot was for isolates of P. cinnamomi but only for the collar rot observed in all of the plants and in the no resistant con- variables (Table 2). Plants grown in PcL infested soil trol clone (125) only one plant didn’t show collar rot. In showed a higher (by a factor of two) percentage of collar two Castanea sativa clones, 3205 and Mara, respectively rot, percentage circumference of collar rot and length of 80% and 50% of the plants showed symptoms of collar collar rot than plants grown with PcS isolate (Figure 2). root. The higher susceptibility to collar rot in plants growing The percentage circumference of collar rot varied on soil inoculated with the PcL isolate confirms the among clones, ranging between 0 and 62% of circumfer- higher aggressiveness of this isolate, as observed in ence depending on the clone (Table 3). A quarter of excised stem tests (MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA et al., 2007). clones were classified as highly resistant to spreading of There was no significant interaction between isolates lesion from roots to collar, less than 10% of collar cir- and clones, indicating that there was no clone specificity cumference was rotten (Table 3), these clones had a high to these isolates of P. cinnamomi. The lack of clone aptitude for to confine in roots the colonization by P. cin- specificity for the two isolates of P. cinnamomi shown in namomi. Another quarter of clones was resistant (less the present study must be confirmed with more isolates, than 20% circumference of collar rot). Eleven clones as cultivars specificity has been shown among isolates of were partially resistant (20–30% circumference of collar P. cactorum (ALDWINCKLE et al., 1975). rot). Nine clones were classified as susceptible, with col- Analyses of variance showed significant differences lar rot in more than one third of circumference (30–50% among clones for all root and collar rot variables (Table of circumference), clone 3205 (C. sativa) showed more 2). Plants with root rot were observed within all clones, than 46% circumference of collar rot. In another group but the number of plants affected varied between 50 and of five clones more than of 50% of collar circumference 100% among clones (Figure 3). On the basis of the level was rotten. One of these clones was the above-men- of root rot, the group of clones were classified as follows tioned clone 90.025. Only one clone (L315) showed more

15

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 Table 3. – Classification of clones according to the mean clonal value obtained in Student–Newman-Keuls test (SNK test) of level of root rot, percentage circumference of collar rot, collar rot length and percentage of survival with the level of resistance-susceptibility (R-S).

* Castanea sativa; ** Castanea crenata. (1) Within each column, values followed by the same letter are not different at the 5% significance level.

than 60% circumference of collar rot. In this clone, 72% resulted in the following groups: sixteen clones (30% of of plants showed symptoms of collar rot and, according clones) with collar rot length less than 0.5 cm were clas- to root rot level it was classified as susceptible. The sified as highly resistant clones. Thirteen clones were highly susceptible clones (L315, 90.025, 3U, T13, 2003) classified as resistant. Twelve clones (20% of clones) were not capable of confining the pathogen and showed showed collar rot length of less than two cm and were a high level of collar lesions. classified as partially resistant clones. Four clones The mean length of collar rot ranged from 0 cm to 4.5 showed collar rot length of between 2 and 3 cm and were cm (Table 3). Classification on the basis of this variable classified as susceptible clones. The four highly suscepti-

16

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 Genotypic correlations between collar and root rot variables were positive and ranged from 0.89 to 1 (Table 6). Phenotypic correlations between all root rot and col- lar rot variables were positive and highly significant (Table 6). The high genotypic correlations and the high heritability values indicate that resistance of chestnut to P. cinnamomi is under genetic control as in the resis- tance of to P. cinnamomi (STUKE- LY and CRANE, 1994).

Effect of clone and isolate of P. cinnamomi on Survival Figure 4. – Number of clones grouped according to the observed Results of analysis of variance of survival (Table 4) percentage of plants showing collar rot within the individual revealed that there were significant differences among clones. clones, between isolates of P. cinnamomi and for clone- isolate interaction. The plants grown in soil infested ble clones were among the eight most affected clones on with the PcL isolate showed an overall survival rate of the basis of the indicators of level of collar rot percent- 73.7%, and plants grown in soil infested with PcS iso- age and percentage circumference of collar rot. late showed a survival rate of 93.5%. The highly significant differences among clones in The clonal means of survival of plants grown in infest- terms of resistance to P. cinnamomi observed in the soil ed soil ranged from 33% to 100% among clones (Table infestation test, have also been observed in excised and 3). The clone showing the lowest rate of survival (33%) intact stems tests with the same clones (MIRANDA- was clone 90.025. This clone was classified as highly FONTAÍÑA and FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, 2005; MIRANDA- susceptible on the basis of the collar rot variable, but as FONTAÍÑA et al., 2006). In soil infestation test, in some partially resistant on the basis of the level of root rot. clones confined lesions on roots were characteristic, Low mortality after soil inoculation has been used as while in other groups of clones abundant lesions all over an indicator of P. cinnamomi resistance (STUKELY and the root system and collar were observed. CAHILL et al. CRANE, 1994; HARRIS et al., 1983; VETTRAINO et al., 2000, (1993) have shown that the roots of a resistant line of 2001). The high negative phenotypic and genotypic cor- clonal Eucalyptus (but not susceptible seedlings) were relations between collars rot variables and survival sug- able to restrict and confine colonization by P. cinnamomi gested that collar rot was the main cause of death due to and found that the root infestation by P. cinnamomi Phytophthora. DAVISON et al. (1994) found that coloniza- resulted in reduced water transport, wilting and death tion by the pathogen at the small collar of one-year old of Eucalyptus seedlings. Clones with high percentage of Eucalyptus and pine plants is correlated with incidence collar rot and lengths of collar rot have no resistance of death, this may be caused by rapid invasion of P. cin- against the pathogen and have no capacity to confine P. namomi into phloem and xylem, which may thus affect cinnamomi (clones 90.025). Percentage circumference of water movement through the stem. collar rot was the best indicator or descriptor of sensitiv- The phenotypic correlations among survival and root ity. rot variables were significant (Table 6), but the relation The clonal heritability of rot root level and collar rot between root rot lesion and plant death is not complete- variables ranged between 0.54 and 0.71 (Table 2). The ly clear because some clones with a high percentage of clonal heritabilities of length in excised stems tests root rot and level of root rot survived longer than others ranged between 0.92 and 0.95 and in intact stems test with a low percentage of root rot. The three most sensi- ranged between 0.81 and 0.06. tive clones in level of root rot showed survival rates of

Table 4. – Influence of clone, Isolates of P. cinnamomi and clone-isolate interaction on survival leaves persistence and growth. Mean squares and signification levels of the model analysis of variance (excluded control treatment), Minimum (Min.) and Maximum (Max.) clonal mean values, 2 overall mean values with their standard deviations (SD) and clonal heritabilities (H c) with their standard errors (SE).

ns = P > 0.05; * = P > 0.01; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.

17

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 Table 5. – Influence of clone, treatment (Control, Pcl and PcS) clone-treatment interaction on sur- vival, leaves persistence and growth. Mean squares and signification levels of the model analysis of variance, Minimum (Min.) and Maximun (Max.) clonal mean values.

ns = P > 0.05; * = P > 0.01; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.

89% (125) and 100% (3U, 3205). HÜBERLI et al. (1998, infested soils also showed no symptoms of collar or root 2001) found that Eucalyptus and pine plants with large rot. The plants that died both in infested soil and control root lesions survived longer than other plants with soil belonged to the same group of clones. small lesions. A second similar test (unpublished data) carried out Analyses of variance of all survival data (including between July 2002 and May 2004 was developed with 2- data corresponding to the control treatment) revealed year-old plants of the same clones, the same isolates, significant differences among clones, between treat- but with ambient (i.e. not controlled) conditions in a ments (control, PcL and PcS) and for clone-treatment glasshouse and watering only by mist (without subirri- interaction (Table 5). There was no significant difference gation) and free drainage. Percentage of survival of between the plants grown with the PcS isolate and the plants in this test was 94% and the percentage of root control plants, (the survival rate of both was close to rot was approximately 70% in two isolates, after two 93%), but rate of survival of plants grown with the PcL years. The low mortality in this last not subirrigated isolate was significantly different from the others. The test, during two years, and the high mortality rate after plants that did not survive within the control treatment flooding the samples in the data of the soil inoculation (7%) all died immediately after flooding during the first experiment under controlled environmental conditions, days of the test, and showed no symptoms of Phytoph- suggested that the mortality of plants was also related thora. The few plants that died during the first days in to excessive flooding. BROWNE and MIRCETICH (1988)

Table 6. – Genotypic (above the diagonal) and Phenotypic (below the diagonal) Pearson correlations coefficients between pairs of traits. Values of the diagonal are clonal heritabilities (in italic type). Genotypic correlations that values above 1 are treated as 1.

a Pearson correlation coefficient (Phenotypic Correlation): r. b p-value: significance probability for testing the null hypothesis that the true correlation in the population is zero. ns = P > 0.05; * = P > 0.01; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.

18

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 found that when trees are subjected to periods of fre- quent or prolonged soil flooding, the incidence and severity of Phytophthora root and crown rots in apple might increase greatly. Therefore in tests carried out under such conditions, survival alone was not sufficient to indicate resistance to the pathogen, as mortality may be affected by environmental conditions or by other pathogens such as Fusarium and Phytium. The develop- ment of these pathogens is favoured by excessive mois- ture and nitrogen fertilization, which inhibits plant Figure 5. – Effect of treatment (P. cinnamomi Lourizán (PcL) maturation and thus favours disease development and P. cinnamomi Sigras (PcS)) and control) on growth. Initial (EGEL, 1999). Plants that died under control treatment height in May (May), May-September height increment (May- did not show any symptoms of collar or root rot caused Sept. Incr.) and July-September height increment (July-Sept. by Phytophthora. Preventive measures, which include Incr.) in cm. weekly application of a fungicide and avoiding excess watering, would also interfere with the development of significant differences mainly for clones and isolates Phytophthora. (Table 4) or treatments (Table 5). A reduction in growth Furthermore, STUKELY and CRANE (1994) considered of inoculated plants was observed, especially in plants that the soil inoculation test is particularly severe, so grown on soil inoculated with the PcL isolate and at the seedlings are exposed to live P. cinnamomi inoculum second half of trial, between July and September (Figure continuously for several months, and reported in a total 5). It is possible that lesions caused in roots, interfered of 80% of Eucalyptus and pine seedlings dying across all on the absorption of water and nutrients and, as a con- families. sequence of that, the reduction on height and diameter increment of plants (Figure 5) and on stem and root dry The effect of P. cinnamomi on leaf persistence, height and weight. STUKELY and CRANE (1994) reported a reduction diameter increment and stem and root dry weight in growth in plants inoculated with P. cinnamomi. Some plants lost their leaves acropetal sense from the BENNET (1988) also observed differences in levels of collar. Analysis of variance of leaf persistence, at the end infection with P. cinnamomi, growth reduction and mor- of the test, revealed significant differences among tality among clones in clonal lines of Eucalyptus. clones, but no significant differences between isolates The dry weight of inoculated plants was lower than (Table 4) or treatments (Table 5) and for the interaction that of control plants. The correlation between root dry clone-treatment. weight and collar rot was negative and significant. Analysis of variance of height and collar diameter The correlation between leaf persistence with root rot increment and stem and root dry weight revealed highly level was negative and significant. The correlations

Table 7. – Phenotypic (rse) and genotypic correlations (rgse) between traits for soil infestation test and excised and intact stem test. Excised stem test: Length (L) of necrosis after 7(L7), 14 (L14) and 21 (L21) days in spring (sp) and autumn (au). Intact stem test: Length (L) of necrosis after 14 (L14), 21 (L21) and 28 (L28) days in spring.

ns = P > 0.05; * = P > 0.01; ** = P < 0.01; *** = P < 0.001.

19

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21 among leaf persistence with stem and root dry weight vival of plants is not sufficient to indicate resistance to were positive and highly significant (Table 6). The the pathogen, as mortality may be affected by environ- lesions on roots and collar caused by P. cinnamomi, pos- mental conditions or by other pathogens. The plants sibly interfered with the leaf persistence and caused a grown on inoculated soil showed a reduction in growth. reduction of rates of photosynthesis, as a result of that, The phenotypic and genotypic correlations between in the stem and root accumulated dry weigh. soil infestation characteristics and the length of necrosis The phenotypic correlation between collar rot and in both intact and excised stem tests were positive and diameter increment was negative and significant (Table highly significant and indicated similar resistance rank- 6), but the correlations between height increment and ings of the clones. collar and root rot variables were not significant. Root and collar rot were negatively and poorly genotypic Acknowledgements correlated with height and diameter increment (geno- typic correlation in Table 6). There was no correlation The present study was carried out at the Centro de Investigacións Forestais e Ambientais de Lourizán as part between height increment of plants and survival. of “Plan de Mellora Xenética de la Xunta de Galicia (FEOGA 2000-2006)” and Project RTA04-152, (Programa Correlation between soil infestation test and excised and Nacional de Recursos y Tecnologías Agroalimentarias). intact stem tests The authors express their gratitude to all staff at the The phenotypic and genotypic correlations between nurseries of the Departamento de Producción Forestal for soil infestation characteristics and the length of necrosis their help in preparing and carrying out the study; to in both intact and excised stem tests were positive and Belén Aramburu García for her help with inoculations highly significant (Table 7). The correlations between and evaluation of the tests, and to the reviewer of the manuscript, especially Dr. BURGI GIERLINGER and Dr. R. S. soil infestation characteristics and the length of necrosis DODD of Silvae Genetica for corrections and helpful sug- in intact stem test were higher than correlations gestions. between soil infestation characteristics and the length of necrosis in excised stem test. References Correlations between the results of both excised and ALDWINCKLE, H. S., F. J. POLACH, W. T. MOLIN and R. C. intact stem tests and the soil inoculation test indicated PEARSON (1975): Pathogenicity of Phytophthora cacto- similar resistance rankings of the clones, thus confirm- rum isolates from New York apple trees and other ing the reliability of these tests and it is therefore possi- sources. Phytopathology 65: 989–994. ble to predict the susceptibility in soil inoculation test BENNET, I. J. (1988): Use of tissue culture techniques for from the results of excised and intact stem tests. Similar the improvement of Eucalyptus marginata Donn. ex results were reported for apple trees by BROWNE and Sm. Ph. D. thesis. Murdoch University, Perth, Aus- MIRCETICH (1993), who observed that mean lengths in tralia. excised and intact rootstock stems were positively corre- BOLETÍN OFICIAL DEL ESTADO (BOE) (2003): RD 289/2003 lated with mean crown rot lengths in rootstocks grown de 7 de marzo, sobre comercialización de los materiales in infested soil (r = 0.59–0.79). Other studies have forestales de reproducción. BOE núm. 58, 8/3/2003. shown that stem and root inoculations are closely corre- BRASIER, C. M. (1969): The effect of light and temperature on reproduction in vitro in two tropical species of Phy- lated in terms of the relative resistance rankings of tophthora. Transactions of the British Mycological Soci- species of (DIXON and THINLAY SIVASITHAM- ety 52: 105–113. PARAM IPPET , 1984), Eucalyptus (T et al., 1985) and oak BRIDGEWATER, F. (1992): Mating Desings. In: FINS et al. (ROBIN and DESPREZ-LOUSTAU, 1998). (eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Forest Genetics. 69–95. 1992 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Netherlands. Selection of variables BROWNE, G. T. and S. M. MIRCETICH (1988): Effects of flood Root rot percentage, root rot level, collar rot percent- duration on the development of Phytophthora root and age, collar circumference rot and collar rot length were crown rots of apple. Phytopathology 78(6): 846–851. closely genetic correlated and the clonal heritabilities BROWNE, G. T. and S. M. MIRCETICH (1993): Relative resis- tance of thirteen apple rootstocks to three species of were moderate to high. Only two variables, root rot level Phytophthora. Phytopatology 83: 744–749. and collar circumference rot, may therefore be evaluat- BURDON, R. D. (1977): Genetic correlation as a concept for ed, to reduce the experimental effort involved. These studying genotype-environment interaction in forest mentioned variables are the best indicators of P. cin- tree breeding. Silvae Genetica 26: 168–175. namomi resistance and are sufficient to estimate this CAHILL, D. M., I. J. BENNETT and J. A. MCCOMB (1993): character. Mechanisms of resistance to Phytophthora cinnamomi in clonal, micropropagated Eucalyptus marginata. Plant Pathology 42: 865–872. Conclusions DAVISON, E. M., M. C. STUKELY, C. E. CRANE and F. C. S. There is no clone of chestnut that is absolutely resis- TAY (1994): Invasion of Phloem and Xylem of Woody tant to had lesions on roots but some clones are resis- Stems and Roots of Eucalyptus marginata and Pinus tant to spreading of pathogen in roots and from roots to radiata by Phytophthora cinnamomi. Phytophatology collar. There were significant differences for isolates of 84 (4): 335–340. DIXON, K. W. and K. THINLAY SIVASITHAMPARAM (1984): P. cinnamomi but only for the collar rot variables. Technique for rapid assessment of tolerance of Banksia Percentage circumference of collar rot was the best spp. to root rot caused by Phytophthora cinnamomi. indicator or descriptor of sensitivity. Percentage of sur- Plant Disease 68, 1077–80.

20

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics Miranda-Fontaina et. al.·Silvae Genetica (2007) 56-1, 11-21

EGEL, D. S. (1999): Preventing seedling diseases in the SALESSES, G., L. RONCO, J. E. CHAUVIN and J. CHAPA greenhouse. Purdue University Cooperative Extensio (1993a): Amélioration génétique du chataignier, Mise au service. http://www.ces.purdue.edu/extmedia/menu.htm. point de tests d’evaluation du comportement vis-à-vis ERWIN, D. C. and O. K. RIBEIRO (1996): Phytophthora Dis- de la maladie de léncre. Lárboriculture Fruitiere 458: eases Worldwide. American Phytopathological Society 23–31. Press, St Paul, MN. SALESSES, G., J. CHAPA and P. CHAZERANS (1993b): Screen- EUROPEAN COUNCIL (1999): Directive 199/150/EC on the ing and breeding for ink disease resistance. Proceedings marketing of forest reproductive material. of the International Congress on Chestnut, Spoleto, FALCONER, D. S. (1989): Introduction to quantitative Italy, October 0–23, 545–549. genetics. Third edition. Longman Scientific and Techni- SANTINI, A., G. P. BARZANTI and P. CAPERTTI (2003): Sus- cal. ceptibility of some Mesophilic Hardwoods to Alder Phy- FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, J. (1996): Variabilidad isoenzimática, tophthora. Journal of Phytopathology 151 (7–8), morfológica y selección clonal en Castanea sativa Miller 406–410. Castanea crenata Sieb. et Zucc., Castanea mollissima e SCHAD, C., G. SOLIGNAT, J. GRENTE and P. VENOT (1952): híbridos interespecíficos. Tesis doctoral, Univ. Polit. de Recherches sur le chataignier a la Station de Brive. Madrid. Annales de l’amelioration des plantes III: 369–458. FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, J., R. A. VÁZQUEZ-RUIZ-DE-OCENDA, R. STUKELY, M. J. C. and C. E. CRANE (1994): Genetically DÍAZ-VÁZQUEZ and S. PEREIRA-LORENZO (2001): For. based resistance of Eucalyptus marginata to Phytoph- Snow Landsc. Res. Evaluation of resistance of Castanea thora cinnamomi. Phytopathology 84: 650–656. sp. clones to Phytophthora sp. using excised chestnut THEMANN, V. K. and S. WERRES (1998): Use of Rhododen- shoots 76(3): 451–454. dron leaves to detect Phytophthora species in root and HARRIS, J. A., F. Y. KASSABY, I. W. SMITH and G. C. MARKS soil samples. Nachrichtenblatt des Deutschen Pflanzen- (1983): Intra-specific variation in resistance of Phytoph- schutzdienstes 50, 37–45. thora cinnamomi in . Aust. Plant THEMANN, K. and S. WERRES: Guidelines for the handling Pathol. 12: 20–22. of the Rhododendron leaf test to detect Phytophthora HÜBERLI, D., G. E. St J. HARDY, I. C. TOMMERUP and I. J. spp. in root, soil and water samples. www.bba.de/ COLQUHOUN (1998): Temperature changes resistance of phytoph/diagn_r.htm clonal Eucalyptus marginata to Phytophthora cinnamo- TIPPETT, J. T., T. C. HILL and B. L. SHEARER (1985): Resis- mi. In Seventh International Congress of Plant Patholo- tance of Eucalyptus spp. to invasion by Phytophthora gy: 2.5.4. Edinburgh. cinnamomi. Australian Journal of Botany 33: 409–18. HÜBERLI, D., I. C. TOMMERUP, M. P. DOBROWOLSKI, M. C. URQUIJO, P. (1956): La regeneración del castaño. Bol. Pat. CALVER and G. E. St J. HARDY (2001): Phenotypic varia- tion in a clonal lineage of two Phytophthora cinnamomi Veg. Ent. Agr. XXII, 217–232. populations from Western Australia. Mycol. Res 105 VANNINI, A. and A. M. VETTRAINO (2002): Sources of resis- (9): 1053–1064. tance to in naturalized and MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA, M. E. and J. FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ (2005): cultivated proveniences of sweet chestnut in Italy and Variabilidad clonal de castaño híbrido en resistencia a Spain. JPP. Volume 84 (3) – November 2002. Phytophthora cinnamomi. IV Congreso Forestal VETTRAINO, A. M., A. SCALISE, S. CHERUBINI and A. VANNINI Español. Zaragoza. 26–30 Septiembre 2005. Mesa (2001): Variability in resistance to Phytophthora cam- temática 2, ponencia 4. bivora of Castanea sativa wild population and selected MIRANDA-FONTAÍÑA, M. E., FERNÁNDEZ-LÓPEZ, J., VET- cultivars in Italy and Spain. Second International TRAINO, A. M., VANNINI, A. 2006. Variabilidad genética IUFRO meeting on Phytophthora in forests and natural en resistencia a Phytophthora cinnamomi de 51 clones ecosystems. 30 Sept-5 Oct in Perth and Albany, Western de Castanea sp. evaluada mediante test de tallo corta- Australia. do. Accepted for publication in: Investigación Agraria. VETTRAINO, A. M, G. NATILI, N. ANSELMI and A. VANNINI Sistemas y Recursos Forestales. (2001): Recovery and pathogenicity of Phytophthora RAMOS GUEDES-LAFARGUE M. and G. SALESSES (1999): Ink species associated with a resurgence of ink disease in disease resistance: some preliminary elements from the Castanea sativa in Italy. Plant Pathology 50, 90–96. study of different crosses. Proceedings of the 2nd Intern. VETTRAINO, A. M., O. MOREL, C. PERLEROU, S. ROBIN, Symp. on Chestnut, Bordeaux, France, 19-23 October S. DIAMANDIS and A. VANNINI (2005): Occurrence and 1998. Acta Horticulturae 464: 355–361. distribution of Phytophthora species in European chest- ROBIN, C. and M. L. DESPREZ-LOUSTAU (1998): Testing stands, and their association with Ink Disease and variability in pathogenicity of Phytophthora cinnamo- crown decline. European Journal of Plant Pathology mi. European Journal of Plant Pathology 104, 465–75. 111: 169–180 (12). ROBIN, C., G. CAPRON and M. L. DESPREZ-LOUSTAU (2001): VIEITEZ, E. (1960): Obtención de castaños resistentes a la Root infection by Phytophthora cinnamomi in seedlings enfermedad de la tinta. Centro Regional de Enseñanzas of three oak species. Plant Pathology 50: 708–716. y Experiencias Forestales de Lourizán, Pontevedra.

21

DOI:10.1515/sg-2007-0002 edited by Thünen Institute of Forest Genetics