DOCSLIB.ORG

Density Assumptions for Converting Geodetic Glacier Volume Change to Mass Change

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Density Assumptions for Converting Geodetic Glacier Volume Change to Mass Change EGU Journal Logos (RGB) Open Access Open Access Open Access Advances in Annales Nonlinear Processes Geosciences Geophysicae in Geophysics Open Access Open Access Natural Hazards Natural Hazards and Earth System and Earth System Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Chemistry Chemistry and Physics and Physics Discussions Open Access Open Access Atmospheric Atmospheric Measurement Measurement Techniques Techniques Discussions Open Access Open Access Biogeosciences Biogeosciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Climate Climate of the Past of the Past Discussions Open Access Open Access Earth System Earth System Dynamics Dynamics Discussions Open Access Geoscientific Geoscientific Open Access Instrumentation Instrumentation Methods and Methods and Data Systems Data Systems Discussions Open Access Open Access Geoscientific Geoscientific Model Development Model Development Discussions Open Access Open Access Hydrology and Hydrology and Earth System Earth System Sciences Sciences Discussions Open Access Open Access Ocean Science Ocean Science Discussions Open Access Open Access Solid Earth Solid Earth Discussions The Cryosphere, 7, 877–887, 2013 Open Access Open Access www.the-cryosphere.net/7/877/2013/ The Cryosphere doi:10.5194/tc-7-877-2013 The Cryosphere Discussions © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. Density assumptions for converting geodetic glacier volume change to mass change M. Huss Department of Geosciences, University of Fribourg, 1700 Fribourg, Switzerland Correspondence to: M. Huss ([email protected]) Received: 16 December 2012 – Published in The Cryosphere Discuss.: 11 January 2013 Revised: 21 April 2013 – Accepted: 2 May 2013 – Published: 27 May 2013 Abstract. The geodetic method is widely used for assess- be covered and the integrated changes of the whole glacier ing changes in the mass balance of mountain glaciers. How- system are captured. However, the differencing of digital el- ever, comparison of repeated digital elevation models only evation models (DEMs) provides a change in glacier vol- provides a glacier volume change that must be converted to ume instead of a mass change that is the relevant quantity a change in mass using a density assumption or model. This for climate impact assessments (e.g. sea-level rise contribu- study investigates the use of a constant factor for the volume- tion and mountain hydrology). In glaciological studies, ob- to-mass conversion based on a firn compaction model applied servable volume change 1V is usually converted to a mass to simplified glacier geometries with idealized climate forc- change 1M by assuming a conversion factor f1V as ing, and two glaciers with long-term mass balance series. It = · is shown that the “density” of geodetic volume change is not 1M f1V 1V. (1) a constant factor and is systematically smaller than ice den- The robustness of f1V in time and space is crucial for the sity in most cases. This is explained by the accretion/removal accuracy of geodetic mass balance determination but has re- of low-density firn layers, and changes in the firn density pro- ceived little attention so far. file with positive/negative mass balance. Assuming a value of It can be shown that the factor f varies from case to −3 1V 850±60 kgm to convert volume change to mass change is case, and is inherently difficult to determine. A temporal appropriate for a wide range of conditions. For short time in- change in glacier mass M is given by the change in glacier tervals (≤ 3 yr), periods with limited volume change, and/or volume V multiplied by its density ρ as changing mass balance gradients, the conversion factor can −3 ∂M ∂(ρV ) however vary from 0–2000 kgm and beyond, which re- = . (2) quires caution when interpreting glacier mass changes based ∂t ∂t on geodetic surveys. Integrated with time this yields 1M = 1ρV + 1Vρ, (3) 1 Introduction where ρ is the bulk density of the glacier including its firn coverage, and 1ρ is the change in average glacier density Determination of glacier mass balance via the comparison over the time interval considered. In practice, the exact in- of two terrain elevation models obtained from air- or space- dividual quantification of 1ρ, ρ and V is however close to borne observation is one of the most popular and accurate impossible. If we write Eq. (3) as methods to monitor glacier mass change over periods of 1ρV a few years to some decades (e.g. Rignot et al., 2003; Bam- 1M = + ρ · 1V = f1V · 1V, (4) 1V ber and Rivera, 2007; Cogley, 2009; Nuth et al., 2010; and Gardelle et al., 2012). Geodetic measurements of the glacier the terms 1ρ, ρ and V can be lumped into the conversion fac- mass budget are powerful as large and inaccessible areas can tor f1V which allows direct calculation of mass change from Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 878 M. Huss: Converting glacier volume change to mass change volume change. Nevertheless, it is evident from this formu- logical and the geodetic method are difficult to interpret lation that f1V will not be a straight-forward constant. as they might be explained by various poorly constrained Most studies make basic assumptions on the conversion sources of uncertainty (Fischer, 2011; Zemp et al., 2013). factor between volume change and mass change and often At the mountain-range scale, glacier mass change can also rely on Sorge’s law (Bader, 1954) that prescribes no changes be directly measured with satellite-based observations us- in the vertical firn density profile over time. If Sorge’s law ing gravimetry (e.g. Jacob et al., 2012), but the uncertainties −3 holds, 1ρ (Eq. 3) equals zero, and f1V is about 900 kgm . are still considerable and the spatial resolution is too low This number derives from the density of ice and has been for providing mass variations of individual glaciers. Ground- adopted in many previous assessments of geodetic mass bal- based gravimetry has also been applied for detecting local ance of mountain glaciers (e.g. Cox and March, 2004; Bauder mass changes (Breili and Rolstad, 2009). Application of the et al., 2007; Paul and Haeberli, 2008; and Cogley, 2009). method for determining the overall glacier mass budget is A significant change in volume however implies either pos- however not feasible. itive or negative mass balance, and hence a shift in the firn To date, detailed studies for mountain glaciers that con- line, as well as a change in firn thickness and average density, nect geodetically measured variations in overall ice volume thus directly contradicting Sorge’s law. Based on a simple to their mass balance by taking into account changes in firn analysis of firn area changes, Sapiano et al. (1998) estimated volume and density at a spatially distributed scale are not the average “density” of volume change as 850 kgm−3. Sev- available. In order to investigate the value and the temporal eral recent studies have adopted this value in order to ac- robustness of the conversion factor f1V (Eq. 1), an empiri- count for the effect of increasing or decreasing firn thickness cal firn densification model coupled to idealized surface mass on f1V (Huss et al., 2009; Zemp et al., 2010, 2013; Fischer, balance forcing is applied to a range of simplified glacier ge- 2010, 2011). Another approach is to use zonally variable con- ometries. Further, the evolution of firn thickness and den- version factors (Schiefer et al., 2007; Moholdt et al., 2010; sity since 1960 is simulated for two glaciers in the Swiss Gardelle et al., 2012; Kaeaeb et al., 2012). The uncertainty Alps based on long-term mass balance observations, and range due to the density assumption is explored by either set- the changes in mass and volume are jointly discussed. This −3 −3 ting f1V = 900 kgm for the entire glacier, or 900 kgm study provides recommendations for the “density” of volume −3 in the ablation area, and 500 to 600 kgm in the firn zone change f1V to be used in mass balance studies based on the for converting volume changes to mass changes. Sørensen geodetic method, and demonstrates in which cases the as- et al. (2011) and Bolch et al. (2013) refined this approach sumption of a straight-forward conversion factor fails. by assessing firn densities above the equilibrium line altitude (ELA) of the Greenland ice sheet or Arctic ice caps using firn compaction models. 2 Data and methods Based on a non-steady firn densification model for the per- colation zone of Greenland, Reeh (2008) concludes that the 2.1 Glacier geometry “straight-forward translation of observed short-term ice sheet surface-elevation variations into mass changes may be com- f1V is assessed at two stages: (1) for synthetic glacier ge- pletely misleading.” This is explained by the transient adap- ometries, and (2) in case studies with field data for the 50 yr tations of the firn density profile in response to temporally time series of surface mass balance for the Griesgletscher and varying melt and accumulation rates. Helsen et al. (2008) Silvrettagletscher, Swiss Alps. This has the advantage that, at show that surface elevation changes in the interior of Antarc- stage 1, the response of glacier volume to a prescribed ideal- tica are mainly due to firn depth variations and cannot be in- ized mass balance forcing can be discussed under controlled terpreted as a mass change. These findings related to ice sheet conditions, depicting the dominant features, and at stage 2, mass balance are also relevant regarding mountain glaciers; these findings are put into the applied context of a glacier surface elevation in the accumulation area, and hence glacier monitoring program. volume, is not coupled linearly to glacier mass. A strongly simplified synthetic glacier geometry is defined ◦ Assessing the robustness of the conversion factor f1V nec- at stage 1.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 21: Glaciers and Paleoclimate Read: Chapter 15 Homework Due Thursday Nov
    Learning Objectives (LO) Lecture 21: Glaciers and Paleoclimate Read: Chapter 15 Homework due Thursday Nov. 12 What we’ll learn today:! 1. 1. Glaciers and where they occur! 2. 2. Compare depositional and erosional features of glaciers! 3. 3. Earth-Sun orbital parameters, relevance to interglacial periods ! A glacier is a river of ice. Glaciers can range in size from: 100s of m (mountain glaciers) to 100s of km (continental ice sheets) Most glaciers are 1000s to 100,000s of years old! The Snowline is the lowest elevation of a perennial (2 yrs) snow field. Glaciers can only form above the snowline, where snow does not completely melt in the summer. Requirements: Cold temperatures Polar latitudes or high elevations Sufficient snow Flat area for snow to accumulate Permafrost is permanently frozen soil beneath a seasonal active layer that supports plant life Glaciers are made of compressed, recrystallized snow. Snow buildup in the zone of accumulation flows downhill into the zone of wastage. Glacier-Covered Areas Glacier Coverage (km2) No glaciers in Australia! 160,000 glaciers total 47 countries have glaciers 94% of Earth’s ice is in Greenland and Antarctica Mountain Glaciers are Retreating Worldwide The Antarctic Ice Sheet The Greenland Ice Sheet Glaciers flow downhill through ductile (plastic) deformation & by basal sliding. Brittle deformation near the surface makes cracks, or crevasses. Antarctic ice sheet: ductile flow extends into the ocean to form an ice shelf. Wilkins Ice shelf Breakup http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XUltAHerfpk The Greenland Ice Sheet has fewer and smaller ice shelves. Erosional Features Unique erosional landforms remain after glaciers melt.
    [Show full text]
  • Minimal Geological Methane Emissions During the Younger Dryas-Preboreal Abrupt Warming Event
    UC San Diego UC San Diego Previously Published Works Title Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas-Preboreal abrupt warming event. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1j0249ms Journal Nature, 548(7668) ISSN 0028-0836 Authors Petrenko, Vasilii V Smith, Andrew M Schaefer, Hinrich et al. Publication Date 2017-08-01 DOI 10.1038/nature23316 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California LETTER doi:10.1038/nature23316 Minimal geological methane emissions during the Younger Dryas–Preboreal abrupt warming event Vasilii V. Petrenko1, Andrew M. Smith2, Hinrich Schaefer3, Katja Riedel3, Edward Brook4, Daniel Baggenstos5,6, Christina Harth5, Quan Hua2, Christo Buizert4, Adrian Schilt4, Xavier Fain7, Logan Mitchell4,8, Thomas Bauska4,9, Anais Orsi5,10, Ray F. Weiss5 & Jeffrey P. Severinghaus5 Methane (CH4) is a powerful greenhouse gas and plays a key part atmosphere can only produce combined estimates of natural geological in global atmospheric chemistry. Natural geological emissions and anthropogenic fossil CH4 emissions (refs 2, 12). (fossil methane vented naturally from marine and terrestrial Polar ice contains samples of the preindustrial atmosphere and seeps and mud volcanoes) are thought to contribute around offers the opportunity to quantify geological CH4 in the absence of 52 teragrams of methane per year to the global methane source, anthropogenic fossil CH4. A recent study used a combination of revised 13 13 about 10 per cent of the total, but both bottom-up methods source δ C isotopic signatures and published ice core δ CH4 data to 1 −1 2 (measuring emissions) and top-down approaches (measuring estimate natural geological CH4 at 51 ±​ 20 Tg CH4 yr (1σ range) , atmospheric mole fractions and isotopes)2 for constraining these in agreement with the bottom-up assessment of ref.
    [Show full text]
  • Sea Level and Climate Introduction
    Sea Level and Climate Introduction Global sea level and the Earth’s climate are closely linked. The Earth’s climate has warmed about 1°C (1.8°F) during the last 100 years. As the climate has warmed following the end of a recent cold period known as the “Little Ice Age” in the 19th century, sea level has been rising about 1 to 2 millimeters per year due to the reduction in volume of ice caps, ice fields, and mountain glaciers in addition to the thermal expansion of ocean water. If present trends continue, including an increase in global temperatures caused by increased greenhouse-gas emissions, many of the world’s mountain glaciers will disap- pear. For example, at the current rate of melting, most glaciers will be gone from Glacier National Park, Montana, by the middle of the next century (fig. 1). In Iceland, about 11 percent of the island is covered by glaciers (mostly ice caps). If warm- ing continues, Iceland’s glaciers will decrease by 40 percent by 2100 and virtually disappear by 2200. Most of the current global land ice mass is located in the Antarctic and Greenland ice sheets (table 1). Complete melt- ing of these ice sheets could lead to a sea-level rise of about 80 meters, whereas melting of all other glaciers could lead to a Figure 1. Grinnell Glacier in Glacier National Park, Montana; sea-level rise of only one-half meter. photograph by Carl H. Key, USGS, in 1981. The glacier has been retreating rapidly since the early 1900’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Calving Processes and the Dynamics of Calving Glaciers ⁎ Douglas I
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 143–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers ⁎ Douglas I. Benn a,b, , Charles R. Warren a, Ruth H. Mottram a a School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK b The University Centre in Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway Received 26 October 2006; accepted 13 February 2007 Available online 27 February 2007 Abstract Calving of icebergs is an important component of mass loss from the polar ice sheets and glaciers in many parts of the world. Calving rates can increase dramatically in response to increases in velocity and/or retreat of the glacier margin, with important implications for sea level change. Despite their importance, calving and related dynamic processes are poorly represented in the current generation of ice sheet models. This is largely because understanding the ‘calving problem’ involves several other long-standing problems in glaciology, combined with the difficulties and dangers of field data collection. In this paper, we systematically review different aspects of the calving problem, and outline a new framework for representing calving processes in ice sheet models. We define a hierarchy of calving processes, to distinguish those that exert a fundamental control on the position of the ice margin from more localised processes responsible for individual calving events. The first-order control on calving is the strain rate arising from spatial variations in velocity (particularly sliding speed), which determines the location and depth of surface crevasses. Superimposed on this first-order process are second-order processes that can further erode the ice margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2019 Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone Rosemary C. Leone University of Montana, Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Glaciology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Leone, Rosemary C., "Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11474. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11474 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ICE FLOW IMPACTS THE FIRN STRUCTURE OF GREENLAND’S PERCOLATION ZONE By ROSEMARY CLAIRE LEONE Bachelor of Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 2015 Thesis presented in partial fulfillMent of the requireMents for the degree of Master of Science in Geosciences The University of Montana Missoula, MT DeceMber 2019 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Joel T. Harper, Chair DepartMent of Geosciences Dr. Toby W. Meierbachtol DepartMent of Geosciences Dr. Jesse V. Johnson DepartMent of Computer Science i Leone, RoseMary, M.S, Fall 2019 Geosciences Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland’s Percolation Zone Chairperson: Dr. Joel T. Harper One diMensional siMulations of firn evolution neglect horizontal transport as the firn column Moves down slope during burial.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Remote Sensing Extraction Methods for Glacier Firn Line- Considering Urumqi Glacier No.1 As the Experimental Area
    E3S Web of Conferences 218, 04024 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021804024 ISEESE 2020 Comparison of remote sensing extraction methods for glacier firn line- considering Urumqi Glacier No.1 as the experimental area YANJUN ZHAO1, JUN ZHAO1, XIAOYING YUE2and YANQIANG WANG1 1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China 2State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources/Tien Shan Glaciological Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China Abstract. In mid-latitude glaciers, the altitude of the snowline at the end of the ablating season can be used to indicate the equilibrium line, which can be used as an approximation for it. In this paper, Urumqi Glacier No.1 was selected as the experimental area while Landsat TM/ETM+/OLI images were used to analyze and compare the accuracy as well as applicability of the visual interpretation, Normalized Difference Snow Index, single-band threshold and albedo remote sensing inversion methods for the extraction of the firn lines. The results show that the visual interpretation and the albedo remote sensing inversion methods have strong adaptability, alonger with the high accuracy of the extracted firn line while it is followed by the Normalized Difference Snow Index and the single-band threshold methods. In the year with extremely negative mass balance, the altitude deviation of the firn line extracted by different methods is increased. Except for the years with extremely negative mass balance, the altitude of the firn line at the end of the ablating season has a good indication for the altitude of the balance line.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier (And Ice Sheet) Mass Balance
    Glacier (and ice sheet) Mass Balance The long-term average position of the highest (late summer) firn line ! is termed the Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) Firn is old snow How an ice sheet works (roughly): Accumulation zone ablation zone ice land ocean • Net accumulation creates surface slope Why is the NH insolation important for global ice• sheetSurface advance slope causes (Milankovitch ice to flow towards theory)? edges • Accumulation (and mass flow) is balanced by ablation and/or calving Why focus on summertime? Ice sheets are very sensitive to Normal summertime temperatures! • Ice sheet has parabolic shape. • line represents melt zone • small warming increases melt zone (horizontal area) a lot because of shape! Slightly warmer Influence of shape Warmer climate freezing line Normal freezing line ground Furthermore temperature has a powerful influence on melting rate Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Summer Temperature main factor determining ice growth e.g., a warming will Expand ablation area, lengthen melt season, increase the melt rate, and increase proportion of precip falling as rain It may also bring more precip to the region Since ablation rate increases rapidly with increasing temperature – Summer melting controls ice sheet fate* – Orbital timescales - Summer insolation must control ice sheet growth *Not true for Antarctica in near term though, where it ʼs too cold to melt much at surface Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Rule of thumb is that 1C warming causes an additional 1m of melt (see slope of ablation curve at right)
    [Show full text]
  • A Globally Complete Inventory of Glaciers
    Journal of Glaciology, Vol. 60, No. 221, 2014 doi: 10.3189/2014JoG13J176 537 The Randolph Glacier Inventory: a globally complete inventory of glaciers W. Tad PFEFFER,1 Anthony A. ARENDT,2 Andrew BLISS,2 Tobias BOLCH,3,4 J. Graham COGLEY,5 Alex S. GARDNER,6 Jon-Ove HAGEN,7 Regine HOCK,2,8 Georg KASER,9 Christian KIENHOLZ,2 Evan S. MILES,10 Geir MOHOLDT,11 Nico MOÈ LG,3 Frank PAUL,3 Valentina RADICÂ ,12 Philipp RASTNER,3 Bruce H. RAUP,13 Justin RICH,2 Martin J. SHARP,14 THE RANDOLPH CONSORTIUM15 1Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 2Geophysical Institute, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK, USA 3Department of Geography, University of ZuÈrich, ZuÈrich, Switzerland 4Institute for Cartography, Technische UniversitaÈt Dresden, Dresden, Germany 5Department of Geography, Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada E-mail: [email protected] 6Graduate School of Geography, Clark University, Worcester, MA, USA 7Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway 8Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden 9Institute of Meteorology and Geophysics, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria 10Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK 11Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA 12Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 13National Snow and Ice Data Center, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA 14Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 15A complete list of Consortium authors is in the Appendix ABSTRACT. The Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) is a globally complete collection of digital outlines of glaciers, excluding the ice sheets, developed to meet the needs of the Fifth Assessment of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change for estimates of past and future mass balance.
    [Show full text]
  • Glaciers and Their Significance for the Earth Nature - Vladimir M
    HYDROLOGICAL CYCLE – Vol. IV - Glaciers and Their Significance for the Earth Nature - Vladimir M. Kotlyakov GLACIERS AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE FOR THE EARTH NATURE Vladimir M. Kotlyakov Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia Keywords: Chionosphere, cryosphere, glacial epochs, glacier, glacier-derived runoff, glacier oscillations, glacio-climatic indices, glaciology, glaciosphere, ice, ice formation zones, snow line, theory of glaciation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Development of glaciology 3. Ice as a natural substance 4. Snow and ice in the Nature system of the Earth 5. Snow line and glaciers 6. Regime of surface processes 7. Regime of internal processes 8. Runoff from glaciers 9. Potentialities for the glacier resource use 10. Interaction between glaciation and climate 11. Glacier oscillations 12. Past glaciation of the Earth Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Past, present and future of glaciation are a major focus of interest for glaciology, i.e. the science of the natural systems, whose properties and dynamics are determined by glacial ice. Glaciology is the science at the interfaces between geography, hydrology, geology, and geophysics. Not only glaciers and ice sheets are its subjects, but also are atmospheric ice, snow cover, ice of water basins and streams, underground ice and aufeises (naleds). Ice is a mono-mineral rock. Ten crystal ice variants and one amorphous variety of the ice are known.UNESCO Only the ice-1 variant has been – reve EOLSSaled in the Nature. A cryosphere is formed in the region of interaction between the atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere, and it is characterized bySAMPLE negative or zero temperature. CHAPTERS Glaciology itself studies the glaciosphere that is a totality of snow-ice formations on the Earth's surface.
    [Show full text]
  • Saving the Arctic the Urgent Need to Cut Black Carbon Emissions and Slow Climate Change
    AP PHOTO/IAN JOUGHIN PHOTO/IAN AP Saving the Arctic The Urgent Need to Cut Black Carbon Emissions and Slow Climate Change By Rebecca Lefton and Cathleen Kelly August 2014 WWW.AMERICANPROGRESS.ORG Saving the Arctic The Urgent Need to Cut Black Carbon Emissions and Slow Climate Change By Rebecca Lefton and Cathleen Kelly August 2014 Contents 1 Introduction and summary 3 Where does black carbon come from? 6 Future black carbon emissions in the Arctic 9 Why cutting black carbon outside the Arctic matters 13 Recommendations 19 Conclusion 20 Appendix 24 Endnotes Introduction and summary The Arctic is warming at a rate twice as fast as the rest of the world, in part because of the harsh effects of black carbon pollution on the region, which is made up mostly of snow and ice.1 Black carbon—one of the main components of soot—is a deadly and widespread air pollutant and a potent driver of climate change, espe- cially in the near term and on a regional basis. In colder, icier regions such as the Arctic, it peppers the Arctic snow with heat-absorbing black particles, increasing the amount of heat absorbed and rapidly accelerating local warming. This accel- eration exposes darker ground or water, causing snow and ice melt and lowering the amount of heat reflected away from the Earth.2 Combating climate change requires immediate and long-term cuts in heat-trap- ping carbon pollution, or CO2, around the globe. But reducing carbon pollution alone will not be enough to avoid the worst effects of a rapidly warming Arctic— slashing black carbon emissions near the Arctic and globally must also be part of the solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Edges of Ice-Sheet Glaciology
    Important Things Ice Sheets Do, but Ice Sheet Models Don’t Dr. Robert Bindschadler Chief Scientist Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory NASA Goddard Space Flight Center [email protected] I’ll talk about • Why we need models – from a non-modeler • Why we need good models – recent observations have destroyed confidence in present models • Recent ice-sheet surprises • Responsible physical processes “…understanding of (possible future rapid dynamical changes in ice flow) is too limited to assess their likelihood or provide a best estimate or an upper bound for sea level rise.” IPCC Fourth Assessment Report, Summary for Policy Makers (2007) Future Sea Level is likely underestimated A1B IPCC AR4 (2007) Ice Sheets matter Globally Source: CReSIS and NASA Land area lost by 1-meter rise in sea level Impact of 1-meter sea level rise: Source: Anthoff et al., 2006 Maldives 20th Century Greenland Ice Sheet Sea level Change (mm/a) -1 0 +1 accumulation 450 Gt/a melting 225 Gt/a ice flow 225 Gt/a Approximately in “mass balance” 21st Century Greenland Ice Sheet Sea level Change (mm/a) -1 0 +1 accumulation melting ice flow Things could get a little better or a lot worse Increased ice flow will dominate the future rate of change A History Lesson • Less ice in HIGH SEA LEVEL Less warmer ice climates • Ice sheets More shrink faster LOW ice than they TEMPERATURE WARM grow • Sea level change is not COLD THEN NOW smooth Time Decreasing Mass Balance (Source: Luthcke et al., unpub.) Greenland Ice Sheet Mass Balance GREENLAND (Source: IPCC FAR) Antarctic Ice Sheet Mass Balance ANTARCTICA (Source: IPCC FAR) Pace of ice sheet changes have astonished experts is the common agent behind these changes Ice sheets HATE water! Fastest Flow at the Edges Interior: 1000’s meters thick and slow Perimeter: 100’s meters thick and fast Source: Rignot and Thomas Response time and speed of perturbation propagation are tied directly to ice flow speed 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Ilulissat Icefjord
    World Heritage Scanned Nomination File Name: 1149.pdf UNESCO Region: EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA __________________________________________________________________________________________________ SITE NAME: Ilulissat Icefjord DATE OF INSCRIPTION: 7th July 2004 STATE PARTY: DENMARK CRITERIA: N (i) (iii) DECISION OF THE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE: Excerpt from the Report of the 28th Session of the World Heritage Committee Criterion (i): The Ilulissat Icefjord is an outstanding example of a stage in the Earth’s history: the last ice age of the Quaternary Period. The ice-stream is one of the fastest (19m per day) and most active in the world. Its annual calving of over 35 cu. km of ice accounts for 10% of the production of all Greenland calf ice, more than any other glacier outside Antarctica. The glacier has been the object of scientific attention for 250 years and, along with its relative ease of accessibility, has significantly added to the understanding of ice-cap glaciology, climate change and related geomorphic processes. Criterion (iii): The combination of a huge ice sheet and a fast moving glacial ice-stream calving into a fjord covered by icebergs is a phenomenon only seen in Greenland and Antarctica. Ilulissat offers both scientists and visitors easy access for close view of the calving glacier front as it cascades down from the ice sheet and into the ice-choked fjord. The wild and highly scenic combination of rock, ice and sea, along with the dramatic sounds produced by the moving ice, combine to present a memorable natural spectacle. BRIEF DESCRIPTIONS Located on the west coast of Greenland, 250-km north of the Arctic Circle, Greenland’s Ilulissat Icefjord (40,240-ha) is the sea mouth of Sermeq Kujalleq, one of the few glaciers through which the Greenland ice cap reaches the sea.
    [Show full text]