DOCSLIB.ORG

ISS Massbalance2018 2Hr for Website.Key

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ISS Massbalance2018 2Hr for Website.Key Glacier summer school 2018, McCarthy, Alaska What is mass balance ? Regine Hock Claridenfirn, Switzerland, 1916 1914 • Terminology, Definitions, Units • Conventional and reference surface mass balance • Firn line, snow line, ELA • Glacier runoff • Global mass changes PART I Terminology Claridenfirn, Switzerland, 1916 1914 Background General reference for mass-balance terminology has been Anonymous,1969, J. Glaciology 8(52). in practice diverging and inconsistent and confusing use of terminology new methods, e.g. remote sensing, require update Working group (2008-2012) by GLOSSARY International Association of OF GLACIER Cryospheric Sciences (IACS) MASS BALANCE aims to update and revise Anonymous (1969) AND and to provide a consistent terminology for all RELATED glaciers (i.e. mountain glaciers, ice caps and ice sheets) TERMS Cogley, J.G., R. Hock, L.A. Rasmussen, A.A. Arendt, A. Bauder, R.J. Braithwaite, P. Jansson, G. Kaser, M. Möller, L. Nicholson and M. Zemp, 2011, Glossary of Glacier Mass Balance and Related Terms, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris. Can be downloaded from: http://www.cryosphericsciences.org/mass_balance_glossary/ massbalanceglossary Glacier mass balance Mass balance is the change in the mass of a glacier, or part of the glacier, over a stated span of time: =mass budget t . • SPACE: study volume needs to be ‘mass imbalance’ ΔM = ∫ Mdt defined t1 • mass balance is often quoted for volumes other than that of the whole glacier, for example a column of unit cross section • important to report the domain ! •TIME: the time period (esp important € for comparison with model results) • mass change can be studied over any period Net gain of mass • often done over a year or winter/summer seasons --> Annual mass balance (formerly ‘Net’) Firn line Long-term ELA Accumulation area: acc > abl Net loss of mass Ablation area: acc < abl Equilibrium line: acc = abl t . ΔM = ∫ Mdt t1 t . Δmb= c+ a = ∫ (c+ a)dt t ACCUMULATION, (c, C) 1 € • Snow fall ABLATION (a, A) • Deposition of hoar, freezing rain •Melting • Windborne blowing snow/ •Sublimation drifting snow •Loss of windborne blowing • Avalanching snow/drifting snow € •Avalanching •Calving, submarine melt ... internal acc internal melt Calving Submarine melt basal freeze-on basal melt Mass balance components: It’s more than snowfall and melt Total mass budget: sum of climatic balance and frontal ablation Cogley, J.G., R. Hock, L.A. Rasmussen, A.A. Arendt, A. Bauder, R.J. Braithwaite, P. Jansson, G. Kaser, M. Möller, L. Nicholson and M. Zemp, 2011, Glossary of Glacier Mass Balance and Related Terms, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris. Mass balance components Precipitation - Surface accumulation precipitation includes rain; rain water is not accumulation; water is not considered to be part of the glacier Accumulation - Net accumulation - Net acc is a balance, acc is not Cogley, J.G., R. Hock, L.A. Rasmussen, A.A. Arendt, A. Bauder, R.J. Braithwaite, P. Jansson, G. Kaser, M. Möller, L. Nicholson and M. Zemp, 2011, Glossary of Glacier Mass Balance and Related Terms, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris. Winter balance <--> accumulation Summer balance <--> ablation What is measured in ice cores? Ba = Bw+Bs = Acc + Abl Bw= Accw Bs= Ablw Implications for comparison of field measurements with model results? C, A can be modeled, but what is measured often is Bw, Bs Mass balance components Precipitation - Surface accumulation precipitation includes rain; rain water is not accumulation; water is not considered to be part of the glacier Accumulation - Net accumulation - Net acc is a balance, acc is not Melt - meltwater runoff Melt water may refreeze and does not contribute to meltwater runoff Meltwater runoff - Runoff Runoff includes rain water Cogley, J.G., R. Hock, L.A. Rasmussen, A.A. Arendt, A. Bauder, R.J. Braithwaite, P. Jansson, G. Kaser, M. Möller, L. Nicholson and M. Zemp, 2011, Glossary of Glacier Mass Balance and Related Terms, IHP-VII Technical Documents in Hydrology No. 86, IACS Contribution No. 2, UNESCO-IHP, Paris. What is mass balance? Mass balance of a column csfc LAYERS asfc surface ρ snow? compressible? internal ρ firn? ai c h i qin qout basal cb ab !11 What is mass balance? Change of the mass over a stated span of time Mass balance of a column c = accumulation a = ablation (is negative) Δmb= csfc + asfc + ci + ai + cb + ab + qin + qout csfc Surface internal basal flux divergence LAYERS asfc surface ρ € snow? compressible? internal ρ firn? ai Surface c h i qin qout internal qin qout basal !12 cb ab basal Terminology ‘mess’ Mass balance of a column c = accumulation a = ablation Δmb= csfc + asfc + ci + ai + cb + ab + qin + qout Surface internal basal flux divergence Continuity equation € Mass balance ? SMB ? Surface . → q internal q h = b− ∇Q in out Thickness change basal € What is mass balance? Mass balance of a column c = accumulation a = ablation Δmb= csfc + asfc + ci + ai + cb + ab + qin + qout surface Surface internal basal flux divergence q internal q Climatic balance, bclim in € out Climatic-basal balance, b basal (Total) mass balance, Δm . → h = b− ∇Q € What do you measure with GPS vs with a stake? Δmb= csfc + asfc + ci + ai + cb + ab + qin + qout Surface internal basal flux divergence Climatic balance Climatic-basal balance € (Total) mass balance GPS Stake . → h = b− ∇Q € What do you measure with GPS vs with a stake? Δmb= csfc + asfc + ci + ai + cb + ab + qin + qout Surface internal basal flux divergence Climatic balance Climatic-basal balance € (Total) mass balance GPS Stake •GPS --> total mass balance (but partitioning in components unknown) •Stake --> only surface mass balance, measurement relative to top of the stake What do you measure with GPS vs with a stake? GPS Point/part of glacier Glacier-wide Interpolating point data over entire glacier •GPS --> total mass •total mass balance balance --> geodetic balance Stake •Stake --> only surface •total mass balance mass balance, (for land-terminating non- measurement relative to calving glaciers) top of the stake Why does the geodetic method work? Surface - Does not need any ice velocity measurements internal q qout Over an entire glacier (no ice in flowing into another ice mass) the flux divergence is zero, i.e. height changes equal the climatic-basal basal mass balance (accounting for density); assuming no changes at the glacier bed Does an elevation change at point always indicate a change in mass? • changes in elevation dVh dMm dSL can occur without ≠ ≠ changes in mass or dt dt dt visa versa Calving flux • only includes mass loss due to calving •BUT: >50% of the mass loss at the glacier front can be due to submarine melting (even if grounded) ---> frontal ablation • mass loss at the glacier front (includes calving, submarine melting, arial melt/ sublimation ...) What is ice discharge? Mass flux or volumetric flux of ice through a glacier cross- section or “gate”. The gate can be anywhere on the glacier, but is often at the glacier terminus. Time systems: Annual mass balance, i.e. balance over (roughly) one year • stratigraphic system • fixed-date system • floating-date system • combined system Ablation area Accumulation areaAccumulation area Ablation fixed-date fixed-date fixed-date system system system Summer Summer Winter Winter stratigraphic system • End winter snow probing: What system? • Stratigraphic system: dates are unknown !21 Time Systems of Annual Measurements of Mass Balance Reported to World Glacier Monitoring System WGMS (Cumulative to 2008) No information provided 1519 Fixed-date system 917 Stratigraphic system 931 Combined system 265 Other 188 Total of reported annual measurements 3820 --> comparing observations with model results problematic if time system not known What is specific mass balance ? 1. The mass balance at a specific location ? 2. The mass balance of the entire glacier ? 3. The mass balance expressed in m w.e. ? Definition: Mass balance expressed per unit area, that is, with dimension [M L–2] or as a rate [M L–2 T–1] often kg m–2 or m w.e. The prefix “specific” is not necessary. The units make clear whether or not it is specific. Specific mass balance may be reported for a point on the surface (if it is a surface mass balance), a column of unit cross-section, or a larger volume such as the entire glacier. Balances reported for a point are always specific. Mass-balance units • Mass [M] kg, Gt (=109 kg, 1 billion tonnes) • mass change per unit area [M L-2] --> kg m-2 (specific unit) • m or mm water equivalent (w.e.): -> 1 kg of water (density 1000 kg m-3) has thickness of 1 mm when distributed over 1 m2 -> kg m-2 and mm are numerically identical -> 1 m w.e. = 1000 kg m-2 / density of water • m3 w.e. or km3 w.e. (1 km3 w.e. = 1 Gt) --> important to add w.e. or i.e. (ice equiv.) • Sea-level equivalent: kg m-2 x glacier area /-(density of water x area of the ocean) (362x106 km2) Often not included: • changes in ocean area; any delay and storage in transport of water in the terrestrial water cycle • isostatic adjustment of the land surface, tectonic movements • differentiate between grounded and floating ice (floating ice does not contribute to sea-level; grounded ice contributes only to a small fraction since the ice already displaces water) Mass balance time series look different in different units Black Rapids Glacier -1 -1 Gt a by Christian Kienholz a m w.e. PART II Concept of conventional and reference surface balance Claridenfirn, Switzerland, 1916 1914 Mass balance as climate indicator ? Stable climate Step change in Stable climate Ba = 0 climate Ba = 0 Steady-state Ba < 0 Steady-state Glacier retreat Glaciers are indicators of climate change ? B=V / A • conventional mass balance glacier area/hypsometry is updated annually • reference surface balance glacier area/hypsometry is kept constant Harrison, W., Elsberg, Cox and March, 2005.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Calving Processes and the Dynamics of Calving Glaciers ⁎ Douglas I
    Earth-Science Reviews 82 (2007) 143–179 www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Calving processes and the dynamics of calving glaciers ⁎ Douglas I. Benn a,b, , Charles R. Warren a, Ruth H. Mottram a a School of Geography and Geosciences, University of St Andrews, KY16 9AL, UK b The University Centre in Svalbard, PO Box 156, N-9171 Longyearbyen, Norway Received 26 October 2006; accepted 13 February 2007 Available online 27 February 2007 Abstract Calving of icebergs is an important component of mass loss from the polar ice sheets and glaciers in many parts of the world. Calving rates can increase dramatically in response to increases in velocity and/or retreat of the glacier margin, with important implications for sea level change. Despite their importance, calving and related dynamic processes are poorly represented in the current generation of ice sheet models. This is largely because understanding the ‘calving problem’ involves several other long-standing problems in glaciology, combined with the difficulties and dangers of field data collection. In this paper, we systematically review different aspects of the calving problem, and outline a new framework for representing calving processes in ice sheet models. We define a hierarchy of calving processes, to distinguish those that exert a fundamental control on the position of the ice margin from more localised processes responsible for individual calving events. The first-order control on calving is the strain rate arising from spatial variations in velocity (particularly sliding speed), which determines the location and depth of surface crevasses. Superimposed on this first-order process are second-order processes that can further erode the ice margin.
    [Show full text]
  • Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2019 Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone Rosemary C. Leone University of Montana, Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Glaciology Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Leone, Rosemary C., "Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland's Percolation Zone" (2019). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 11474. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/11474 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ICE FLOW IMPACTS THE FIRN STRUCTURE OF GREENLAND’S PERCOLATION ZONE By ROSEMARY CLAIRE LEONE Bachelor of Science, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 2015 Thesis presented in partial fulfillMent of the requireMents for the degree of Master of Science in Geosciences The University of Montana Missoula, MT DeceMber 2019 Approved by: Scott Whittenburg, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Joel T. Harper, Chair DepartMent of Geosciences Dr. Toby W. Meierbachtol DepartMent of Geosciences Dr. Jesse V. Johnson DepartMent of Computer Science i Leone, RoseMary, M.S, Fall 2019 Geosciences Ice Flow Impacts the Firn Structure of Greenland’s Percolation Zone Chairperson: Dr. Joel T. Harper One diMensional siMulations of firn evolution neglect horizontal transport as the firn column Moves down slope during burial.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparison of Remote Sensing Extraction Methods for Glacier Firn Line- Considering Urumqi Glacier No.1 As the Experimental Area
    E3S Web of Conferences 218, 04024 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202021804024 ISEESE 2020 Comparison of remote sensing extraction methods for glacier firn line- considering Urumqi Glacier No.1 as the experimental area YANJUN ZHAO1, JUN ZHAO1, XIAOYING YUE2and YANQIANG WANG1 1College of Geography and Environmental Science, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, China 2State Key Laboratory of Cryospheric Sciences, Northwest Institute of Eco-Environment and Resources/Tien Shan Glaciological Station, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China Abstract. In mid-latitude glaciers, the altitude of the snowline at the end of the ablating season can be used to indicate the equilibrium line, which can be used as an approximation for it. In this paper, Urumqi Glacier No.1 was selected as the experimental area while Landsat TM/ETM+/OLI images were used to analyze and compare the accuracy as well as applicability of the visual interpretation, Normalized Difference Snow Index, single-band threshold and albedo remote sensing inversion methods for the extraction of the firn lines. The results show that the visual interpretation and the albedo remote sensing inversion methods have strong adaptability, alonger with the high accuracy of the extracted firn line while it is followed by the Normalized Difference Snow Index and the single-band threshold methods. In the year with extremely negative mass balance, the altitude deviation of the firn line extracted by different methods is increased. Except for the years with extremely negative mass balance, the altitude of the firn line at the end of the ablating season has a good indication for the altitude of the balance line.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier (And Ice Sheet) Mass Balance
    Glacier (and ice sheet) Mass Balance The long-term average position of the highest (late summer) firn line ! is termed the Equilibrium Line Altitude (ELA) Firn is old snow How an ice sheet works (roughly): Accumulation zone ablation zone ice land ocean • Net accumulation creates surface slope Why is the NH insolation important for global ice• sheetSurface advance slope causes (Milankovitch ice to flow towards theory)? edges • Accumulation (and mass flow) is balanced by ablation and/or calving Why focus on summertime? Ice sheets are very sensitive to Normal summertime temperatures! • Ice sheet has parabolic shape. • line represents melt zone • small warming increases melt zone (horizontal area) a lot because of shape! Slightly warmer Influence of shape Warmer climate freezing line Normal freezing line ground Furthermore temperature has a powerful influence on melting rate Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Summer Temperature main factor determining ice growth e.g., a warming will Expand ablation area, lengthen melt season, increase the melt rate, and increase proportion of precip falling as rain It may also bring more precip to the region Since ablation rate increases rapidly with increasing temperature – Summer melting controls ice sheet fate* – Orbital timescales - Summer insolation must control ice sheet growth *Not true for Antarctica in near term though, where it ʼs too cold to melt much at surface Temperature and Ice Mass Balance Rule of thumb is that 1C warming causes an additional 1m of melt (see slope of ablation curve at right)
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Editor and Reviewers
    Dear Editor and Reviewers, We are grateful for your constructive review of our manuscript. We made our best to address all the suggestions and provide an improved and fully revised manuscript. A response to each of the reviewers’ comments is given below but we would like to highlight the most important updates of manuscript: - We now present a research article with improved visuals and more in-depth discussion. - We compare our FAC dataset and maps to three regional climate models. - The construction of empirical functions is slightly updated, simplified and presented in the main text. We thank the reviewers for improving significantly the study. Sincerely, Baptiste Vandecrux on behalf of the co-authors Review #1 by Sergey Marchenko Reviewer’s comment Authors’ response General comments Physical geography. Authors use the mean annual air temperature and net surface accumulation as arguments in functions describing the spatial distribution of FAC10. The functions are fitted to minimize the misfit with empirical estimates of FAC10 from cores. One important thing that is missing in the text is a detailed description of the physical (or may be practical) motivation for the choice of the above mentioned arguments. Both characteristics (net annual surface accumulation and mean annual air temperature) integrate the effects of processes occurring during the cold and warm parts of a year. Net annual surface accumulation is the result of mass accumulation in winter and surface melt in In our study 풃̅̇ is defined as “net snow summer. While the first one can be expected to be positively linked with FAC (more accumulation in accumulation” (snowfall + deposition – sublimation) and is not “Net annual surface winter -> more pores), the second one can be expected to be negatively linked with FAC (more melt accumulation”.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean-Driven Thinning Enhances Iceberg Calving and Retreat of Antarctic Ice Shelves
    Ocean-driven thinning enhances iceberg calving and retreat of Antarctic ice shelves Yan Liua,b, John C. Moorea,b,c,d,1, Xiao Chenga,b,1, Rupert M. Gladstonee,f, Jeremy N. Bassisg, Hongxing Liuh, Jiahong Weni, and Fengming Huia,b aState Key Laboratory of Remote Sensing Science, College of Global Change and Earth System Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; bJoint Center for Global Change Studies, Beijing 100875, China; cArctic Centre, University of Lapland, 96100 Rovaniemi, Finland; dDepartment of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala 75236, Sweden; eAntarctic Climate and Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia; fVersuchsanstalt für Wasserbau, Hydrologie und Glaziologie, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland; gDepartment of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2143; hDepartment of Geography, McMicken College of Arts & Sciences, University of Cincinnati, OH 45221-0131; and iDepartment of Geography, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China Edited by Anny Cazenave, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales, Toulouse, France, and approved February 10, 2015 (received for review August 7, 2014) Iceberg calving from all Antarctic ice shelves has never been defined as the calving flux necessary to maintain a steady-state directly measured, despite playing a crucial role in ice sheet mass calving front for a given set of ice thicknesses and velocities along balance. Rapid changes to iceberg calving naturally arise from the the ice front gate (2, 3). Estimating the mass balance of ice sporadic detachment of large tabular bergs but can also be shelves out of steady state, however, requires additional in- triggered by climate forcing.
    [Show full text]
  • A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers
    COVER PHOTOGRAPH: Glaciers near Mount Shuksan and Nooksack Cirque, Washington. Photograph 86R1-054, taken on September 5, 1986, by the U.S. Geological Survey. A Strategy for Monitoring Glaciers By Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimme I, and Dennis C. Trabant U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 1132 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Gordon P. Eaton, Director The use of firm, trade, and brand names in this report is for identification purposes only and does not constitute endorsement by the U.S. Government U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE : 1997 Free on application to the U.S. Geological Survey Branch of Information Services Box 25286 Denver, CO 80225-0286 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publications Data Fountain, Andrew G. A strategy for monitoring glaciers / by Andrew G. Fountain, Robert M. Krimmel, and Dennis C. Trabant. P. cm. -- (U.S. Geological Survey circular ; 1132) Includes bibliographical references (p. - ). Supt. of Docs. no.: I 19.4/2: 1132 1. Glaciers--United States. I. Krimmel, Robert M. II. Trabant, Dennis. III. Title. IV. Series. GB2415.F68 1997 551.31’2 --dc21 96-51837 CIP ISBN 0-607-86638-l CONTENTS Abstract . ...*..... 1 Introduction . ...* . 1 Goals ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Previous Efforts of the U.S. Geological Survey ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changes in Glacier Facies Zonation on Devon Ice Cap, Nunavut, Detected
    The Cryosphere Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-2018-250 Manuscript under review for journal The Cryosphere Discussion started: 26 November 2018 c Author(s) 2018. CC BY 4.0 License. 1 Changes in glacier facies zonation on Devon Ice Cap, Nunavut, detected from SAR imagery 2 and field observations 3 4 Tyler de Jong1, Luke Copland1, David Burgess2 5 1 Department of Geography, Environment and Geomatics, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario 6 K1N 6N5, Canada 7 2 Natural Resources Canada, 601 Booth St., Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0E8, Canada 8 9 Abstract 10 Envisat ASAR WS images, verified against mass balance, ice core, ground-penetrating radar and 11 air temperature measurements, are used to map changes in the distribution of glacier facies zones 12 across Devon Ice Cap between 2004 and 2011. Glacier ice, saturation/percolation and pseudo dry 13 snow zones are readily distinguishable in the satellite imagery, and the superimposed ice zone can 14 be mapped after comparison with ground measurements. Over the study period there has been a 15 clear upglacier migration of glacier facies, resulting in regions close to the firn line switching from 16 being part of the accumulation area with high backscatter to being part of the ablation area with 17 relatively low backscatter. This has coincided with a rapid increase in positive degree days near 18 the ice cap summit, and an increase in the glacier ice zone from 71% of the ice cap in 2005 to 92% 19 of the ice cap in 2011. This has significant implications for the area of the ice cap subject to 20 meltwater runoff.
    [Show full text]
  • 02 How Do Glaciers Form.Pdf
    Changing Landscapes: Glaciated Landscapes How do glaciers form? What you need to know The glacial system including inputs, outputs, stores and transfers of energy and materials Change in the inputs to and outputs from a glacier over short and long-time scales The glacial budget including glacier mass balance and equilibrium Positive and negative feedback in the glacier system Seasonal changes and their impact on the glacier budget GLACIER ICE FORMATION Glacier ice is derived mainly through compacted snow This can only happen if snow survives all year round – snow that survives summer melting is called firn or névé A key factor is the number of positive degree-days – fewer leads to less melting so snow, then ice can accumulate As snow is compacted trapped air is expelled, density increases and ice forms at the bottom (the process is called diagenesis) Some summer melting creates meltwater and this fills the gaps between the grains of ice helping to increase the density still further GLACIER ICE FORMATION Density comparisons (pure water = 1gcm-3): • snow = 0.06gcm-3 • firn/névé = 0.4gcm-3 • glacier ice = 0.83 to 0.91gcm-3 (pure ice = 0.92gcm-3) As ice is compacted it becomes granular Despite the cold, there’s usually a thin intergranular film around each grain of ice (caused by a solution of salts that lowers the freezing point of water) This is a lubricant that aids ice movement GLACIER ICE Air pockets in névé give it a white-ish colour... ...whilst glacier ice is a blue or glassy-green GLACIER ICE FORMATION In areas of high snowfall and temperatures that fluctuate about 0°C (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Laser Altimetry Reveals Complex Pattern of Greenland Ice Sheet Dynamics
    Laser altimetry reveals complex pattern of Greenland Ice Sheet dynamics Beata M. Csathoa,1, Anton F. Schenka, Cornelis J. van der Veenb, Gregory Babonisa, Kyle Duncana, Soroush Rezvanbehbahanic, Michiel R. van den Broeked, Sebastian B. Simonsene, Sudhagar Nagarajanf, and Jan H. van Angelend aDepartment of Geology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260; Departments of bGeography and cGeology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045; dInstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, 3584 CC Utrecht, The Netherlands; eDivision of Geodynamics, DTU Space, National Space institute, DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark; and fDepartment of Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering, Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL 33431 Edited* by Ellen S. Mosley-Thompson, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, and approved November 17, 2014 (received for review June 23, 2014) We present a new record of ice thickness change, reconstructed at response is scaled up to all Greenland outlet glaciers (9–11). nearly 100,000 sites on the Greenland Ice Sheet (GrIS) from laser There are two concerns with this approach. First, understanding altimetry measurements spanning the period 1993–2012, parti- the dynamic response of marine-terminating outlet glaciers to tioned into changes due to surface mass balance (SMB) and ice a warming climate—a prerequisite for deriving reliable mass dynamics. We estimate a mean annual GrIS mass loss of 243 ± balance projections—remains a major challenge (12–14). Sec- 18 Gt·y−1, equivalent to 0.68 mm·y−1 sea level rise (SLR) for 2003– ond, considering the complexity of recent behavior of outlet 2009. Dynamic thinning contributed 48%, with the largest rates glaciers (15, 16), it is far from clear how four well-studied glaciers occurring in 2004–2006, followed by a gradual decrease balanced represent all of Greenland’s outlet glaciers and whether their by accelerating SMB loss.
    [Show full text]
  • Module 5 the Land
    UNIVERSITY OF THE ARCTIC Module 5 The Land Developed by Alec E. Aitken, Associate Professor, Department of Geography, University of Saskatchewan Key Terms and Concepts • endogenic processes • exogenic processes Glaciers and Glaciology • alpine (valley) glaciers • cirque glaciers • continental glaciers • firn • glacier ice • glacier mass balance – accumulation and accumulation zone – ablation and ablation zone – equilibrium line • glacier motion – internal deformation and Glen’s Flow Law – basal sliding – soft sediment deformation – extending flow – compressive flow • glacial erosion – abrasion – plucking – hydrolysis – carbonation – oxidation Bachelor of Circumpolar Studies 311 1 UNIVERSITY OF THE ARCTIC • glacial transport – traction – regelation – supraglacial – englacial – subglacial • glacial deposition – ablation (melt out) – lodgement Alpine Landforms • erosional landforms – striations – roches moutonnées – cirques – glacial troughs – fiords • depositional landforms – lateral moraines – end moraines – hummocky moraine – ground moraine • glaciofluvial sediments and landforms – eskers – braided stream channels and sandbars Permafrost and Periglacial Landscapes • permafrost – permafrost table – active layer – level of zero amplitude – talik – continuous permafrost – discontinuous permafrost 2 Land and Environment I UNIVERSITY OF THE ARCTIC – sporadic permafrost Periglacial Processes and Landforms • frost shattering – block fields – felsenmeer – grus • ground ice – patterned ground – segregated ice - frost heave - cryoturbation - non-sorted
    [Show full text]
  • © Cambridge University Press Cambridge
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-80620-6 - Creep and Fracture of Ice Erland M. Schulson and Paul Duval Index More information Index 100-year wave force, 336 friction and fracture, 289, 376 60° dislocations, 17, 82, 88 indentation failure, 345 microstructure, 45, 70, 237, 255, 273 abrasion, 337 multiscale fracture and frictional accommodation processes of basal slip, 165 sliding, 386 acoustic emission, 78, 90, 108 nested envelopes, 377 across-column cleavage cracks, 278 pressure–area relationship, 349, 352 across-column confinement, 282 S2 growth texture, 246, 273 across-column cracks, 282, 306, SHEBA faults, 371 across-column loading, 275 SHEBA stress states, 377 across-column strength, 246, 249, 275 Arctic Ocean, 1, 45, 190, 361 activation energy, 71, 84, 95, 111, 118, 131 aspect ratio, 344 activation volume, 114, 182 atmospheric ice, 219, 221, 241, 243 activity of pyramidal slip systems, 158 atmospheric icing, 31 activity of slip systems, 168 atmospheric impurities, 113 adiabatic heating, 291, 348 atomic packing factor, 9 adiabatic softening, 291 audible report, 240 affine self-consistent model, 160 avalanches, 206 air bubbles, 38 air-hydrate crystals, 37 bands, 89 albedo, 363 basal activity, 162 aligned first-year sea ice, 246 basal dislocations, 77 along-column confinement, 282 basal planes, 214, along-column confining stress, 282, basal screw dislocations, 77, 87 along-column strength, 244, 275 basal shear bands, 163 ammonia dihydrate, 181 basal slip, 18, 77, 127, 228 ammonia–water system, 186 basal slip lines, 77 amorphous forms
    [Show full text]