DOCSLIB.ORG

Counter-Memorial of the Republic of Honduras

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Counter-Memorial of the Republic of Honduras INTERNATI ON AL COURT OF JUSTICE MARITIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) COUNTER-MEMORIAL OF THE REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS VOLUME 1 21 MARCH 2002 iii CONTENTS LIST OF COLOUR PLATES IN VOLUME 1.. ........................................................ vii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION .............................................................................. ! 1. Outline of the Honduran Counter-Memorial ............................................. l II. Omissions, Confusions and Contradictions in the Memorial of Nicaragua ................................................................................................... 4 A. Nicaragua Ignores the 1906 Arbitral A ward of the King of Spain and the 1960 J udgment of the International Court of Justice ................................................................................................. 4 B. Nicaragua Ignores Relevant International Conventions ..................... 6 C. Nicaragua's Memorial is Contradictory asto the Issue of the Applicable Law to be Applied by the International Court of Justice .................................................................................. 6 D. Nicaragua Misrepresents the Significance ofthe Islands, Reefs and Banks Situated North of Parallel 15 .................................. 7 E. Nicaragua Ignores the Traditional Use by Both States of Parallel 15 as a Boundary ................................................................... 8 F. Nicaragua Makes Selective Use ofHistorical Material, Particularly in Relation to the Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris .................................................................................................... 9 G. Nicaragua's Allegation of Bad Faith By Honduras Is Misconceived ................................................................................... 10 H. Nicaragua's Presentation and Translation of Certain Material is Inadequate ...................................................................... 11 CHAPTER 2: THE GEOGRAPHICAL CONTEXT OF THE DISPUTE .................... 13 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 13 1. Geography of the Maritime Areas, Including the Islands and Fishing Banks .......................................................................................... 13 II. The Importance of Delimitation Treaties in the Region .......................... 20 (1) The 1928 Nicaragua!Colombia Treaty ............................................. 21 (2) The 1986 Honduras/Colombia Treaty .............................................. 22 (3) The 1993 Colombia!Jamaica Treaty ................................................ 22 Ill. The "Nicaraguan Rise" ............................................................................ 24 IV. The Traditional Delimitation Line ofthe 15'h Paralle1.. ........................... 25 iv CHAPTER 3: THE HISTORICAL AND POLITICAL BACKGROUND TO THE PROCEEDINGS ............................................................................................ 29 1. lntroduction .............................................................................................. 29 1 Il. The History During the Colonial Period and the 19 h Century ................. 29 III. The Turtle Fishing Dispute between Nicaragua and the United Kingdom ( 1896-1905) ............................................................................. 33 IV. 1906-1960 ................................................................................................ 36 V. The Conduct ofthe Parties between 1960 and 1979 ................................ 38 VI. Practice Since 1979 .................................................................................. 39 A. The Legislation of the Parties on Maritime Areas .......................... .41 B. The Po licy of Harassment and Incidents Provoked by Nicaragua ......................................................................................... 4 7 C. The Recent Amplification of the Nicaraguan Maritime Claims .......................................................... ,................................... 52 VII. Cartographie Evidence ............................................................................. 56 CHAPTER 4: THE APPLICABLE LAW .... ., ......................................................... 59 1. The Applicability of the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea ...................................................................................................... 59 Il. The Legal Principles Applicable to the Case ........................................... 61 A. The Arguments ofNicaragua ........................................................... 61 B. The Position of Honduras ................................................................. 63 Ill. The Place and Role of Equity .................................................................. 64 IV. The Legal Definition and Treatment of Islands ....................................... 67 V. The Nicaraguan Geomorphological Argument.. ...................................... 68 CHAPTER 5: THE UTI POSSIDETIS JURIS ......................................................... 71 1. The Significance of Uti Possidetis Juris for the Present Proceedings .............................................................................................. 71 II. The Application of the Uti Possidetis Juris in the Region Concemed: the Existence of an Effective Boundary Inherited from the Colonization .............................................................................. 71 III. The Fonction of the Uti Possidetis Juris in the Present Case: Establishment of an Initial Legal Title ..................................................... 78 IV. Conclusion ............................................................................................... 86 v CHAPTER 6: EFFECTIVITÉS AND THE EXERCISE OF HONDURAN SOVEREIGNTY AND JURISDICTION OVER THE ISLANDS AND SURROUNDING WATERS NORTH OF THE 15TH PARALLEL .............................. 87 I. Introduction .............................................................................................. 87 Il. The Indicia of Honduran Exercise of Sovereignty ................................... 89 A. Honduras Exercises Administrative Control Over, and Applies Honduran Public and Administrative Legislation and Laws to, the A rea ....................................................................... 91 B. Honduras Applies and Enforces Its Criminal and Civil Laws in the Area North ofParallel15 ............................................. 95 (1) Criminal Law ............................................................................ 96 (2) Civil Law .................................................................................. 97 C. Honduras Regulates the Exploration and Exploitation ofOil and Gas Activities in the Area ......................................................... 98 D. Honduras Regulates Fisheries Activities in the Area ..................... 102 E. Honduras Regulates Immigration in the Area ................................ 118 F. Honduras Carries Out Military and Naval Patrols in the A rea, As Weil As Search and Rescue Operations .......................... 121 G. Honduras Engages in Public Works and Scientific Surveys in the A rea ...................................................................................... 125 H. Third Parties Recognise Honduran Sovereignty and Jurisdiction in the Area .................................................................. 126 I. Honduras Has Consistently Objected To Any Claims by Nicaragua To the Area North ofParallel 15 .................................. 130 III. Conclusions ............................................................................................ 130 CHAPTER 7: THE APPLICATl ON OF THE RELEVANT CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE COURSE OF THE SINGLE MARITIME BOUNDARY ...................................................................................................... 133 1. Introduction ............................................................................................ 133 II. The Circumstances lnvoked by Nicaragua Which Are Irrelevant or Misconceived ..................................................................................... 134 A. The Bathymetrie Feature, the Nicaraguan Rise ............................. 134 B. The Alleged Security Need ............................................................ 134 C. The Argument That "the Bisector" Would Give to Nicaragua an Equitable Share ofthe Resources of the Area .......... l35 D. The Instability of the Mouth ofthe River Coco ............................. l36 VI III. The Relevant Circumstances Ignored by Nicaragua .............................. l37 A. The Conduct ofthe Parties ............................................................. l37 (1) Oil and Gas Concessions ........................................................ 138 (2) Fishing Activities ................................................................... 138 (3) Naval and Aerial Patrols ......................................................... l39 B. The Presence oflslands .................................................................. 140 C. Boundary and Other Treaties Circumscribing the Relevant Area ................................................................................................ l41 (1) The 1928 Nicaragua!Colombia Treaty ................................... 142 (2) The 1986 Honduras/Colombia Treaty ...................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Court of Justice
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE Peace Palace, Carnegieplein 2, 2517 KJ The Hague, Netherlands Tel.: +31 (0)70 302 2323 Fax: +31 (0)70 364 9928 Website: www.icj-cij.org Summary Not an official document Summary 2007/4 8 October 2007 Territorial and Maritime Dispute between Nicaragua and Honduras in the Caribbean Sea (Nicaragua v. Honduras) Summary of the Judgment of 8 October 2007 Chronology of the procedure and submissions of the Parties (paras. 1-19) On 8 December 1999 Nicaragua filed an Application instituting proceedings against Honduras in respect of a dispute relating to the delimitation of the maritime areas appertaining to each of those States in the Caribbean Sea. In its Application, Nicaragua sought to found the jurisdiction of the Court on the provisions of Article XXXI of the American Treaty on Pacific Settlement (officially known as the “Pact of Bogotá”), as well as on the declarations accepting the jurisdiction of the Court made by the Parties, as provided for in Article 36, paragraph 2, of the Statute of the Court. Since the Court included upon the Bench no judge of the nationality of either of the Parties, each Party proceeded to exercise its right conferred by Article 31, paragraph 3, of the Statute to choose a judge ad hoc to sit in the case. Nicaragua chose Mr. Giorgio Gaja and Honduras first chose Mr. Julio González Campos, who resigned on 17 August 2006, and subsequently Mr. Santiago Torres Bernárdez. By an Order dated 21 March 2000 the President of the Court fixed 21 March 2001 and 21 March 2002, respectively, as the time-limits for the filing of the Memorial of Nicaragua and the Counter-Memorial of Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • OGC-98-5 U.S. Insular Areas: Application of the U.S. Constitution
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Chairman, Committee on GAO Resources, House of Representatives November 1997 U.S. INSULAR AREAS Application of the U.S. Constitution GAO/OGC-98-5 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Office of the General Counsel B-271897 November 7, 1997 The Honorable Don Young Chairman Committee on Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: More than 4 million U.S. citizens and nationals live in insular areas1 under the jurisdiction of the United States. The Territorial Clause of the Constitution authorizes the Congress to “make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property” of the United States.2 Relying on the Territorial Clause, the Congress has enacted legislation making some provisions of the Constitution explicitly applicable in the insular areas. In addition to this congressional action, courts from time to time have ruled on the application of constitutional provisions to one or more of the insular areas. You asked us to update our 1991 report to you on the applicability of provisions of the Constitution to five insular areas: Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands (the CNMI), American Samoa, and Guam. You asked specifically about significant judicial and legislative developments concerning the political or tax status of these areas, as well as court decisions since our earlier report involving the applicability of constitutional provisions to these areas. We have included this information in appendix I. 1As we did in our 1991 report on this issue, Applicability of Relevant Provisions of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Report of the OAS Electoral Observation Mission in Honduras
    Preliminary Report of the OAS Electoral Observation Mission in Honduras The Electoral Observation Mission of the Organization of American States (EOM/OAS) in Honduras, headed by former President of Bolivia Jorge “Tuto” Quiroga, deployed a team of 82 experts and observers from 25 countries to cover the general elections held on November 26. The Mission began by dispatching an advance technical team to the country on October 30 to observe the preparation of the electoral cases (maletas electorales, containing election materials), the training being given to members of the polling stations, and the delivery of their credentials, along with other aspects relating to the transmission and dissemination of results, including demonstrations and the test run drill on November 12. On November 6 that team was joined by the mobile group observers, who traveled to the different departments in the country to observe in situ the progress being made with preparations for the elections and to meet the actors involved in the electoral process. The Mission completed its deployment with the arrival of the experts, regional coordinators, and international observers, together with the Head of Mission and the Special Advisor to the EOM, former President of Guatemala Álvaro Colom. During its stay in Honduras, the Mission met with government and electoral authorities, political parties and coalitions, the Supreme Court of Justice, representatives of civil society, the electricity company (Empresa de Energía de Honduras), and the diplomatic community, as well as other actors. The experts conducted a substantive analysis of the electoral process in terms of its organization, the technology used, campaign financing, gender perspective, electoral justice, and facilities for voting abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from the Government of Honduras on Actions Taken
    Appendix 13 – Letter from the Government of Honduras on actions taken OFFICIAL LETTER No.1077-DGPE/DSM-10 Tegucigalpa, June 4, 2010 Excellency, It is my honor to present my compliments and to say that the purpose of this letter in follow- up to the two notes sent to the international community in April 2010 is to express our desire for genuine understanding of the situation in our country and that the international community be suitably and correctly informed of the efforts of the Government of Honduras to implement a real process of national unity and reconciliation. I should begin by drawing attention to the fact that our president, Mr. Porfirio Lobo Sosa, has set about the task of leading the country with the strength afforded him by the legitimacy of a transparent election extensively observed by the international community, in which the majority of the people of Honduras clearly, lawfully, and unmistakably expressed their will in the search for peace, stability, and restored unity. This electoral process, called by the Supreme Electoral Tribunal under the administration of former President Zelaya Rosales, was preceded by the primary elections in which all legally registered political parties chose their candidates to the National Congress, Municipalities, and the Presidency of the Republic, a process monitored by international observers—including those from the Organization of American States (OAS)—who noted the transparency and success thereof. I am at pains to draw your attention to the fact that Article 51 of the Constitution of Honduras defines the Supreme Electoral Tribunal as an autonomous and independent entity responsible for the convocation, organization, direction, and supervision of electoral processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of the Northern Nicaragua Rise During the Oligocene–Miocene: Drowning by Environmental Factors
    Sedimentary Geology 175 (2005) 237–258 www.elsevier.com/locate/sedgeo Research paper Evolution of the Northern Nicaragua Rise during the Oligocene–Miocene: Drowning by environmental factors Maria Muttia,T, Andre´ W. Droxlerb, Andrew D. Cunninghamc aInstitut fu¨r Geowissenschaften, Universita¨t Potsdam, Postfach 60 15 53, Potsdam D-14415, Germany bRice University, Department of Earth Science, P.O. Box 1892, Houston, TX 77251-1892, USA cBP Amoco, 501 Westlake Park Boulevard, Houston, TX 77253-3092, USA Received 16 June 2004; received in revised form 14 December 2004; accepted 20 December 2004 Abstract Possible causes to explain platform drowning have been hotly debated by carbonate sedimentologists for more than a decade now. In this paper, we present multiple evidence to explain the drowning of a carbonate megabank that covered most of the modern Northern Nicaragua Rise (NNR) during an interval spanning from late Oligocene to early Miocene by the interaction of several environmental factors. The recovery during ODP Leg 165 of late Oligocene to middle Miocene sedimentary sequences in the sub-seafloor of the modern channels and basin, Pedro Channel and Walton Basin, respectively, that dissect the NNR (Site 1000) and south of the rise in the Colombian Basin (Site 999), combined with information from dredged rock samples, allows us to explore in more detail the timing and possible mechanisms responsible for the drowning of the megabank and its relationship to Miocene climate change. The modern system of isolated banks and shelves dissected by a series of intervening seaways and basins on the NNR has evolved from a continuous, shallow-water carbonate bmegabankQ that extended from the Honduras/Nicaraguan mainland to the modern island of Jamaica.
    [Show full text]
  • Rejoinder of The~ Republic of Honduras
    INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE MARJTIME DELIMITATION BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) REJOINDER OF THE~ REPUBLIC OF HONDURAS VOLUMEI 13 AUGUST 2003 v CHAPTER 6: GEOGRAPHIC FACTORS .................................................... 107 A. Cabo Gracias a Dios: Where the Land Boundary Meets the Sea ................................................................................................. 108 B. The Coasts of the Parties that Face the Maritime Area to be Delimited ....................................................................................... 111 C. The Islands and Rocks oflmportance to This Case which Lie in Front ofthe Land Boundary Terminus ...................................... 113 D. The Non-Relevance of Shallow Geomorphological Sea-Floor Features ......................................................................................... 116 CHAPTER 7: OBSERVATIONS ON THE NICARAGUAN LINE ................... 119 A. The Technical Characteristics ofthe Nicaraguan Line .................. 119 B. The Nicaraguan Line Runs on the Wrong Side of the Honduran Islands Situated between 15° N. Latitude and 15°15' N. Latitude ......................................................................... 120 C. The Nicaraguan Line Gives No Weight to Honduran Islands North of 15°15' N. Latitude .......................................................... 121 D. The Bisector of Coastal Fronts Presented by Nicaragua Is Based upon a Flawed Assessment of Coastal Fronts and Delimitation Methods ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Honduras SIGI 2019 Category Low SIGI Value 2019 22%
    Country Honduras SIGI 2019 Category Low SIGI Value 2019 22% Discrimination in the family 25% Legal framework on child marriage 50% Percentage of girls under 18 married 27% Legal framework on household responsibilities 50% Proportion of the population declaring that children will suffer if mothers are working outside home for a pay - Female to male ratio of time spent on unpaid care work 3.1 Legal framework on inheritance 0% Legal framework on divorce 0% Restricted physical integrity 25% Legal framework on violence against women 25% Proportion of the female population justifying domestic violence 12% Prevalence of domestic violence against women (lifetime) 22% Sex ratio at birth (natural =105) 105 Legal framework on reproductive rights 100% Female population with unmet needs for family planning 11% Restricted access to productive and financial resources 24% Legal framework on working rights 100% Proportion of the population declaring this is not acceptable for a woman in their family to work outside home for a pay 7% Share of managers (male) 53% Legal framework on access to non-land assets 0% Share of house owners (male) 69% Legal framework on access to land assets 25% Share of agricultural land holders (male) - Legal framework on access to financial services 25% Share of account holders (male) 54% Restricted civil liberties 15% Legal framework on civil rights 0% Legal framework on freedom of movement 0% Percentage of women in the total number of persons not feeling safe walking alone at night 66% Legal framework on political participation 0% Share of the population that believes men are better political leaders than women - Percentage of male MP’s 79% Legal framework on access to justice 0% Share of women declaring lack of confidence in the justice system 58% Note: Higher values indicate higher inequality.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations HCNSO Student Work 4-30-2019 The edimeS ntology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform Luis Ramirez [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd Part of the Geology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Oceanography and Atmospheric Sciences and Meteorology Commons Share Feedback About This Item NSUWorks Citation Luis Ramirez. 2019. The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank - an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform. Master's thesis. Nova Southeastern University. Retrieved from NSUWorks, . (503) https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/503. This Thesis is brought to you by the HCNSO Student Work at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in HCNSO Student Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thesis of Luis Ramirez Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science M.S. Marine Environmental Sciences Nova Southeastern University Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography April 2019 Approved: Thesis Committee Major Professor: Sam Purkis, Ph.D Committee Member: Bernhard Riegl, Ph.D Committee Member: Robert Madden, Ph.D This thesis is available at NSUWorks: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/occ_stuetd/503 HALMOS COLLEGE OF NATURAL SCIENCES AND OCEANOGRAPHY The Sedimentology of Cay Sal Bank, an Incipiently Drowned Carbonate Platform By Luis F. Ramirez Submitted to the Faculty of Halmos College of Natural Sciences and Oceanography in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science with a specialty in: Marine Environmental Science Nova Southeastern University May 2019 Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Masters of Science: Marine Environmental Science Luis F.
    [Show full text]
  • (Strombus Gigas) in Colombia
    NDF WORKSHOP CASE STUDIES WG 9 – Aquatic Invertebrates CASE STUDY 3 Strombus gigas Country – COLOMBIA Original language – English NON-DETRIMENTAL FINDINGS FOR THE QUEEN CONCH (STROMBUS GIGAS) IN COLOMBIA AUTHORS: Martha Prada1 Erick Castro2 Elizabeth Taylor1 Vladimir Puentes3 Richard Appeldoorn4 Nancy Daves5 1 CORALINA 2 Secretaria de Agricultura y Pesca 3 Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Vivienda y Desarrollo Territorial 4 Universidad Puerto Rico – Caribbean Coral Reef Institute 5 NOAA Fisheries I. BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE TAXA The queen conch (Strombus gigas) has been a highly prized species since pre-Columbian times, dating the period of the Arawak and Carib Indians. Early human civilizations utilized the shell as a horn for reli- gious ceremonies, for trade and ornamentation such as bracelets, hair- pins, and necklaces. Archeologists have also found remnants of conch shell pieces that were used as tools, possibly to hollow out large trees once used as canoes (Brownell and Stevely 1981). The earliest record of commercial harvest and inter-island trade extend from the mid 18th century, when dried conch meat was shipped from the Turks and Caicos Islands to the neighboring island of Hispaniola (Ninnes 1984). In Colombia, queen conch constitutes one of the most important Caribbean fisheries, it is second in value, after the spiny lobster. The oceanic archipelago of San Andrés, Providence and Santa Catalina pro- duces more than 95% country’s total production of this species. This fishery began in the 1970´s when the continental-shelf archipelagos of San Bernardo and Rosario, following full exploitation were quickly depleted due to a lack of effective management (Mora 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL and MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA and HONDURAS in the CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA V
    RUL-30 INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE REPORTS OF JUDGMENTS, ADVISORY OPINIONS AND ORDERS CASE CONCERNING TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) JUDGMENT OF 8 OCTOBER 2007 2007 COUR INTERNATIONALE DE JUSTICE RECUEIL DES ARRE|TS, AVIS CONSULTATIFS ET ORDONNANCES AFFAIRE DU DIFFEuREND TERRITORIAL ET MARITIME ENTRE LE NICARAGUA ET LE HONDURAS DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. HONDURAS) ARRE|T DU 8 OCTOBRE 2007 RUL-30 8 OCTOBER 2007 JUDGMENT TERRITORIAL AND MARITIME DISPUTE BETWEEN NICARAGUA AND HONDURAS IN THE CARIBBEAN SEA (NICARAGUA v. HONDURAS) DIFFEuREND TERRITORIAL ET MARITIME ENTRE LE NICARAGUA ET LE HONDURAS DANS LA MER DES CARAÏBES (NICARAGUA c. HONDURAS) 8 OCTOBRE 2007 ARRÊT RUL-30 659 TABLE OF CONTENTS Paragraphs 1. CHRONOLOGY OF THE PROCEDURE 1-19 2. GEOGRAPHY 20-32 2.1. Configuration of the Nicaraguan and Honduran coasts 20-30 2.2. Geomorphology of the mouth of the River Coco 31-32 3. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND 33-71 4. POSITIONS OF THE PARTIES :AGENERAL OVERVIEW 72-103 4.1. Subject-matter of the dispute 72-73 4.2. Sovereignty over the islands in the area in dispute 74-82 4.3. Maritime delimitation beyond the territorial sea 83-98 4.3.1. Nicaragua’s line: bisector method 83-85 4.3.2. Honduras’s line: “traditional boundary” along the par- allel 14° 59.8′ North latitude (“the 15th parallel”) 86-98 4.4. Starting-point of the maritime boundary 99-101 4.5. Delimitation of the territorial sea 102-103 5. ADMISSIBILITY OF THE NEW CLAIM RELATING TO SOVEREIGNTY OVER THE ISLANDS IN THE AREA IN DISPUTE 104-116 6.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Fishing in British Honduras and Adjacent Coastal Areas
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1966 The Geography of Fishing in British Honduras and Adjacent Coastal Areas. Alan Knowlton Craig Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Recommended Citation Craig, Alan Knowlton, "The Geography of Fishing in British Honduras and Adjacent Coastal Areas." (1966). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 1117. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/1117 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This dissertation has been „ . „ i i>i j ■ m 66—6437 microfilmed exactly as received CRAIG, Alan Knowlton, 1930— THE GEOGRAPHY OF FISHING IN BRITISH HONDURAS AND ADJACENT COASTAL AREAS. Louisiana State University, Ph.D., 1966 G eo g rap h y University Microfilms, Inc., Ann Arbor, Michigan THE GEOGRAPHY OP FISHING IN BRITISH HONDURAS AND ADJACENT COASTAL AREAS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State university and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Geography and Anthropology by Alan Knowlton Craig B.S., Louisiana State university, 1958 January, 1966 PLEASE NOTE* Map pages and Plate pages are not original copy. They tend to "curl". Filmed in the best way possible. University Microfilms, Inc. AC KNQWLEDGMENTS The extent to which the objectives of this study have been acomplished is due in large part to the faithful work of Tiburcio Badillo, fisherman and carpenter of Cay Caulker Village, British Honduras.
    [Show full text]
  • Charter Cities
    William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal Volume 27 (2018-2019) Issue 3 Symposium: Rights Protection in Article 6 International Criminal Law and Beyond March 2019 Charter Cities Lan Cao Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj Part of the International Law Commons, and the International Trade Law Commons Repository Citation Lan Cao, Charter Cities, 27 Wm. & Mary Bill Rts. J. 717 (2019), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/ wmborj/vol27/iss3/6 Copyright c 2019 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmborj CHARTER CITIES Lan Cao* INTRODUCTION Globalization has produced a mongrelized, hybrid, and heterogeneous reality that transcends national territory. For example, in today’s globalized world, corporate products are frequently globally sourced and produced. “A Pontiac Le Mans, osten- sibly a General Motors product of American nationality, is in fact a globally com- posite product involving South Korean assembly; Japanese engines, transaxles and electronics; German design and style engineering; Taiwanese, Singaporean, and Japanese small components; British advertising and marketing; and Irish and Bar- badian data processing.”1 Is this an American product or not? “Products appear to be made everywhere and also nowhere in particular, as shown on the following com- puter circuit label: ‘Made in one or more of the following countries: Korea, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan, Mauritius, Thailand, Indonesia, Mexico, Philip- pines. The exact country of origin is unknown.’”2 Even national governance has become more hybridized under the influence of the forces of globalization.3 The domestic autonomy of states must now contend * Professor Cao is the Betty Hutton Williams Professor of International Economic Law at the Fowler School of Law.
    [Show full text]