DOCSLIB.ORG

IOM RAF Reports Performance 2013

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IOM RAF Reports Performance 2013 AFGHANISTAN IOM RAF (RAPID ASSESSMENT FORM) REPORTS PERFORMANCE FOR YEAR 2013 Disclaimer and Source: This map is compiled by iMMAP. - Datum/Projection: WGS84/Geographic. Date created: 14/01/2015. iMMAP in Afghanistan is funded by The United States This infographic is a representation of the Rapid Assessment Form (RAF) reports approved, closed and Agency for International Development (USAID)/ Office of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). The data, boundaries and names and the designations used on this map do not cancelled per districts in the year 2013. imply official endorsement or acceptance by iMMAP or USAID/OFDA. All information is the best available at the time this map was produced. For copies or information regarding The map highlights the districts where high percentage of reports submitted have been cancelled. specific data sources and methodology: [email protected] Data source: IOM The charts provide information on the total number of reports submitted and the percentage of approved, closed and cancelled by districts and the total number of individuals and families affected. Year 2013: Number of Affected Families per Cancelled Reports Tashkan 1 Number of Number of Muqur 0 Number of Total Number Province District Approved Cancelled Qala‐I‐ Naw 32 Closed Report of Report Kishindih 0 Report Report Bamyan 29 FRH City 35 Badakhshan Argo 1 1 2 Gurziwan 5 Badakhshan Baharak 1 1 Legend Maymana 6 Badakhshan Fayzabad 2 2 Qaysar 2 Badakhshan Tashkan 3 3 Lal Wa Sarjangal 20 Badakhshan Wakhan 1 1 Taywara 150 Badakhshan Yawan 1 1 Lashkar Gah 198 Badakhshan Zebak 1 1 % of Cancelled Reports Nad Ali 67 Badghis Ab Kamari 1 1 Nawa‐I‐ Barak Zayi 116 Badghis Jawand 5 3 8 Gulran 50 Badghis Muqur 1 1 Guzara 398 Badghis Qala‐I‐ Naw 5 5 No Cancelled Reports Hirat 82 Pashtun Zarghun 150 Baghlan Puli Khumri 1 1 Paghman 31 Balkh Kishindih 1 4 5 Shakardara 0 Balkh Nahri Shahi 2 2 4 Surobi 0 Balkh Sholgara 2 15 17 < 10% Kandahar 460 Bamyan Bamyan 27 6 24 57 Mahmudi Raqi 20 Bamyan Panjab 26 1 27 Asadabad 11 Bamyan Waras 32 32 Dangam 2 Bamyan Yakawlang 17 17 Dara‐I‐Pech 178 from 10% to 25% Farah Bala Buluk 1 1 Khas Kunar 33 Farah FRH City 1 1 Narang 8 Sarkani 1 Faryab Bilchiragh 2 2 from 25% to 50% Kunduz 1 Faryab Gurziwan 3 1 4 Mihtarlam 7 Faryab Khwaja Sabz Posh 1 1 Baraki Barak 14 Faryab Maymana 2 2 Khoshi 86 Faryab Pashtun Kot 1 1 Puli Alam 23 Faryab Qaysar 1 1 from 50% to 75% Chaki Wardak 5 Ghor Chaghcharan 14 5 19 Bihsud 0 Ghor Dawlat Yar 1 1 Bagram 0 Ghor Du Layna 1 1 2 Chaharikar 4 Ghor Lal Wa Sarjangal 3 1 4 Jabalussaraj 15 from 75% to 100% Ghor Shahrak 4 4 Sayd Khel 2 Ghor Taywara 1 1 Sia Gird (Ghorbund) 31 Khuram Wa Sarbagh 13 Hilmand Kajaki 3 3 Gosfandi 145 Hilmand Lashkar Gah 2 2 4 Sangcharak 20 Hilmand Nad Ali 4 1 5 Arghandab 22 Hilmand Nahri Sarraj 1 1 Shinkay 11 Hilmand Nawa‐I‐ Barak Zayi 1 1 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Hilmand Sangin 3 3 Hirat Chishti Sharif 3 3 Year 2013: Number of Affected Individuals per Cancelled Reports Hirat Ghoryan 1 1 Hirat Gulran 1 1 Hirat Guzara 2 2 Tashkan 12 Hirat Hirat 1 1 2 Muqur 0 Hirat Injil 2 2 Qala‐I‐ Naw 232 Hirat Kohsan 1 1 Kishindih 0 Hirat Pashtun Zarghun 2 2 Bamyan 158 Hirat Zanda Jan 3 3 FRH City 245 Gurziwan 25 Jawzjan Darzab 23 23 Maymana 63 Kabul Kabul 11 11 Qaysar 14 Kabul Paghman 2 4 6 Lal Wa Sarjangal 138 Kabul Shakardara 4 2 6 Taywara 706 Kabul Surobi 14 2 16 Lashkar Gah 1502 Kandahar Daman 1 1 2 Nad Ali 562 Kandahar Dand 1 1 Nawa‐I‐ Barak Zayi 1112 Kandahar Kandahar 1 2 3 Gulran 213 Guzara 2778 Kandahar Nesh 2 2 Hirat 574 Kapisa Alasay 1 1 Pashtun Zarghun 1094 Kapisa Hisa‐i‐Awali Kohistan 1 1 Paghman 223 Kapisa Hisa‐i‐Duwumi Kohistan 1 1 Shakardara 0 Kapisa Mahmudi Raqi 1 2 1 4 Surobi 0 Kapisa Nijrab 1 1 Kandahar 3186 Kapisa Tagab 1 1 Mahmudi Raqi 130 Asadabad 78 Khost Khost(Matun) 2 2 Dangam 17 Kunar Asadabad 1 3 1 5 Dara‐I‐Pech 1197 Kunar Chawkay 3 3 Khas Kunar 93 Kunar Dangam 1 1 Narang 58 Kunar Dara‐I‐Pech 10 1 11 Sarkani 8 Kunar Khas Kunar 5 2 7 Kunduz 13 Kunar Marawara 1 1 Mihtarlam 50 Kunar Narang 1 1 2 4 Baraki Barak 119 Kunar Nurgal 1 1 Khoshi 502 Puli Alam 198 Kunar Sarkani 2 1 3 Chaki Wardak 80 Kunar Sawkay 1 1 Bihsud 0 Kunar Wata Pur 3 3 Bagram 0 Kunduz Khanabad 1 1 Chaharikar 86 Kunduz Kunduz 1 1 2 Jabalussaraj 98 Kunduz Qalay‐I‐ Zal 1 1 Sayd Khel 54 Laghman Alishing 6 6 Sia Gird (Ghorbund) 141 Laghman Mihtarlam 7 1 8 Khuram Wa Sarbagh 84 Gosfandi 843 Laghman Qarghayi 1 1 Sangcharak 144 Logar Baraki Barak 3 1 5 9 Arghandab 164 Logar Kharwar 2 1 3 Shinkay 143 Logar Khoshi 1 4 1 6 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 Logar Mohammad Agha 3 1 4 Logar Puli Alam 2 2 4 Maydan Wardak Chaki Wardak 1 3 4 Year 2013 Number of Cancelled Reports per District Nangarhar Bihsud 13 1 14 Nangarhar Chaparhar 14 14 Shinkay Nangarhar Dara‐I‐Nur 5 5 Tashkan Arghandab Muqur 6 Sangcharak Nangarhar Deh Bala 8 8 Qala‐I‐ Naw Gosfandi Nangarhar Jalalabad 7 1 8 Kishindih Khuram Wa Sarbagh Nangarhar Khogayani 3 3 Bamyan 5 Sia Gird (Ghorbund) Nangarhar Kuz Kunar 1 1 Nangarhar Surkh Rod 1 1 FRH City Sayd Khel 4 Nuristan Waygal 3 3 Gurziwan Jabalussaraj Paktika Jani Khel 1 1 Paktika Sarobi 2 2 Maymana 3 Chaharikar Paktika Sharan 4 4 Paktika Urgun 2 2 Paktika Yosuf Khel 2 2 Qaysar Bagram 2 Paktya Ali Khail (Jaji) 2 2 Paktya Chamkani 4 4 Lal Wa Sarjangal Bihsud Paktya Laja Ahmad Khail 2 2 1 Panjsher Paryan 1 1 Taywara Chaki Wardak Panjsher Rukha 1 1 0 Parwan Bagram 1 1 Lashkar Gah Puli Alam Parwan Chaharikar 7 1 8 Parwan Jabalussaraj 1 2 3 Parwan Salang 1 1 Nad Ali Khoshi Parwan Sayd Khel 3 1 4 Parwan Shinwari 3 3 Nawa‐I‐ Barak Zayi Baraki Barak Parwan Sia Gird ( Ghorbund) 3 3 Samangan Khuram Wa Sarbagh 2 2 Gulran Mihtarlam Sari Pul Balkhab 1 1 Sari Pul Gosfandi 1 1 Guzara Kunduz Sari Pul Sangcharak 1 1 Takhar Darqad 1 1 Hirat Sarkani Zabul Arghandab 6 6 Pashtun Zarghun Narang Zabul Qalat 1 3 4 Zabul Shahjoy 3 3 Paghman Khas Kunar Zabul Shahre Safa 3 3 Shakardara Dara‐I‐Pech Surobi Dangam Zabul Shinkay 4 4 Kandahar Asadabad Year 2013: % of Cancelled, Closed and Approved Reports per Districts Mahmudi Raqi 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Ali Zal Yar Jan Kot Pur Injil Nur City Rod Zayi Gah ‐ Safa Bala Khel Khel Khel Raqi ‐ Naw (Jaji) Argo Posh Pech I Khail Hirat Agha Nesh I Alam Dand Qalat Shahi ‐ ‐ Kabul Buluk Barak Sharif Sarraj Layna ‐ ‐ Kunar Kunar Kajaki Zebak Tagab Nijrab Urgun I Rukha Sarobi Waras Alasay Surobi I Salang Yawan Sangin Nurgal Khoshi Gulran Bihsud Panjab Muqur Paryan Sharan Qaysar ‐ Darzab Kamari Guzara Daman Nad ‐ Khumri Narang Kohsan Sarkani Darqad Waygal Kunduz Sawkay Jawand Bagram Shinkay Wardak Alishing Shahjoy Balkhab Shahrak Bamyan Sarbagh Baharak Tashkan Zarghun Wakhan Dangam FRH Kharwar Taywara Ghoryan Shinwari Sholgara Kohistan Kohistan Jani Deh Gosfandi Chawkay Qarghayi Kishindih Sarjangal Du Jalalabad Paghman Wata Fayzabad Puli Gurziwan Kandahar Sayd Asadabad Bilchiragh Chamkani Sabz Khanabad Maymana Kuz Khail Surkh Barak Marawara Ab Khogayani Bala Yosuf Chaparhar Zanda Mihtarlam Dara Yakawlang Dawlat Chaharikar Ghorbund) Arghandab Khas Shakardara Qalay Sangcharak Nahri Puli ‐ Dara Shahre Qala Nahri Wa Jabalussaraj Pashtun I Lashkar ( Baraki Ahmad ‐ Wa Chaghcharan Chishti Ali Chaki Khost(Matun) Mahmudi Awali ‐ i Lal ‐ Pashtun Gird Laja Duwumi Khwaja Mohammad ‐ Nawa i ‐ Khuram Sia Hisa Hisa Badakhshan Badghis Bagh Balkh Bamyan Farah Faryab Ghor Hilmand Hirat Jaw Kabul Kandahar Kapisa Kh Kunar Kunduz Laghman Logar M.W. Nangarhar Nur Paktika Paktya Panjsher Parwan Sam Sari Pul Tak Zabul Cancelled Closed Approved.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (2): Delivering Public Services in Insurgency-Affected Obeh District of Herat Province
    One Land, Two Rules (2): Delivering public services in insurgency-affected Obeh district of Herat province Author : S Reza Kazemi Published: 9 December 2018 Downloaded: 8 December 2018 Download URL: https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/wp-admin/post.php The matter of who governs the district of Obeh in the east of Herat province is complicated: control of the district is divided between the Afghan government and the Taleban, and shifts in unpredictable ways. The inhabitants of the district, usually via the mediation of elders, have had to learn how to deal with both sides. The dual nature of authority in Obeh is exemplified by public service delivery; it is always financed through and administered by the Afghan state but, in areas under Taleban control, it is the insurgents who supervise and monitor delivery. In this, the first of a series of case studies looking at the delivery of services in districts over which the Taleban have control or influence, AAN researcher Said Reza Kazemi investigates the provision of governance and security, education, health, electricity, telecommunications and development projects, and unpacks a dual form of governance. Service Delivery in Insurgent-Affected Areas is a joint research project by the Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN) and the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). For the methodology and literature review, see here. Obeh district: the context 1 / 22 Approximately 100 km to the east of Herat city, linked by mainly non-asphalted roads; mountainous, cut through by fertile Harirud River valley
    [Show full text]
  • Maah/Mrrd/Fao/Wfp National Crop Output Assessment
    FAO FAAHM/AFGHANISTAN OSRO/AFG/111/USA MAAH/MRRD/FAO/WFP NATIONAL CROP OUTPUT ASSESSMENT 10th May to 5th June 2003 Farmer met in Badghis while weeding his rain-fed wheat field, 23 May 2003. Raphy Favre, FAO/FAIT Agronomist Consultant, Mission TL Anthony Fitzherbert, FAO Consultant Javier Escobedo, FAO Emergency Agronomist Consultant 25th July 2003 Kabul TABLE OF CONTENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. METHODOLOGY 1. Estimation of Yield 1.1 Field Measurements for Yield Estimates 1.2 Crop Development Stage at the Time of the Assessment 1.3 Interviews with Farmers in the Field 1.4 Selection of Districts and Transects 1.5 Selection of Fields 2. Estimation of Land planted 3. Market Prices IV. RESULTS 4. Estimated Planted Area 4.1 Irrigated Land 4.2 Rain-fed Land 5. Estimated Wheat Yield 5.1 Irrigated Land 5.2 Rain-fed Land 6. Estimated Wheat Production 6.1 Irrigated Land 6.2 Rain-fed Land 6.3 Total Production 6.4 Agricultural Constraints in 2003 7. Estimated Barley Production at Regional Level 8. Wheat Grain Prices V. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEXES ANNEX I - Changes of the Itinerary and Teams Composition due to Security Situation in Southern Afghanistan ANNEX II - Participants ANNEX III - Mission Itinerary and Districts covered by the Survey 2 TABLES Table 1: Estimated irrigated cultivated land in 2003; Total irrigated land cultivated In 2003, irrigated Wheat cultivated and irrigated Barley cultivated in 2003. Table 2: Estimated rain-fed cultivated land in 2003; Total rain-fed land cultivated in 2003, rain-fed Wheat cultivated and rain-fed Barley cultivated in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Men, Masculinities, Conflict and Peacebuilding in Afghanistan
    Navigating norms and insecurity: Men, masculinities, conflict and peacebuilding in Afghanistan WORKING PAPER | NOVEMBER 2018 Henri Myrttinen European Union initiative CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ........................................................................................................................... 1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 2 GENDER, CONFLICT AND PEACEBUILDING .............................................................................................. 3 Why masculinities? ............................................................................................................................. 4 BACKGROUND ......................................................................................................................................... 5 Project background ............................................................................................................................. 5 Women, peace and security in Afghanistan ....................................................................................... 6 Background to the target provinces ................................................................................................... 7 RESEARCH FINDINGS ............................................................................................................................. 11 Gender norms ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Update on Firing Ranges (Frs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (Frs) Background
    State Ministry for Disaster Management and Humanitarian Affairs Directorate of Mine Action Coordination (DMAC) Mine Action Programme of Afghanistan (MAPA) Update On Firing Ranges (FRs), June 2021 Firing Ranges (FRs) Background Total # # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs # of FRs Countries Remarks of FRs Surveyed Completed Cancelled Released Remaining United 85 85 62 0 62 23 UK also have contribution in some State (US) US FRs in Helmand Province German 6 3 2 0 2 4 Fortunately Germany also contracted its one FR in Balkh. Status of 3 FRs is not clear yet. New 5 5 0 1 1 4 Four FRs is ongoing and will be Zealand completed by November 2021 (NZ) Different 16 16 2 2 4 12 Two FRs cleared and two were Countries cancelled Grand 112 109 66 3 69 43 Total Firing Ranges (FRs) Geographical Locations & Status Map Graphical Representation – FRs Status 1,400 1,235 1,200 1,000 800 679.5 600 540 400 200 15.6 - Released Worked on Open Total Achievements (LR and PDIA) § 69 FRs , covering 540 sq. km area released. § Over 184,000 items of EO destroyed § Post Demining Impact Assessment (PDIA) conducted on 21 released FRs. After FR clearance the land is used for agriculture Released/Closed FRs Location Map 69 FRs Released/Closed- 540 Sq Km FRs Remaining Contamination Location Map 39 FRs Open - 679.5 Sq Km 4 FRs Worked on – 15.6 Sq Km Remaining Open FRs-Details Region Province District Village Contaminated By Status Hazard ID Hazard Name Longitude Latitude Hazard Area FR Belongs To Remarks Central Kapisa Tagab Tagab ANSF/NATO/ISAF Open Hz-ID-22430 AF/0205/00827/FR0001B
    [Show full text]
  • Länderinformationen Afghanistan Country
    Staatendokumentation Country of Origin Information Afghanistan Country Report Security Situation (EN) from the COI-CMS Country of Origin Information – Content Management System Compiled on: 17.12.2020, version 3 This project was co-financed by the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund Disclaimer This product of the Country of Origin Information Department of the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum was prepared in conformity with the standards adopted by the Advisory Council of the COI Department and the methodology developed by the COI Department. A Country of Origin Information - Content Management System (COI-CMS) entry is a COI product drawn up in conformity with COI standards to satisfy the requirements of immigration and asylum procedures (regional directorates, initial reception centres, Federal Administrative Court) based on research of existing, credible and primarily publicly accessible information. The content of the COI-CMS provides a general view of the situation with respect to relevant facts in countries of origin or in EU Member States, independent of any given individual case. The content of the COI-CMS includes working translations of foreign-language sources. The content of the COI-CMS is intended for use by the target audience in the institutions tasked with asylum and immigration matters. Section 5, para 5, last sentence of the Act on the Federal Office for Immigration and Asylum (BFA-G) applies to them, i.e. it is as such not part of the country of origin information accessible to the general public. However, it becomes accessible to the party in question by being used in proceedings (party’s right to be heard, use in the decision letter) and to the general public by being used in the decision.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Region CP 2012.Pdf (English)
    Central Region Contingency Plan Humanitarian Regional Team Multi-Hazard Contingency Plan Central Region (Kabul, Kapisa, Logar, Wardak, Panjshir and Parwan Provinces) Period Covered March – December 2012 Last updated 19 Mar 2012 Central Region Contingency Plan Central Region Contingency Plan Table of Contents 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 4 1.1 Regional Context by Hazards .................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Hazards and Risk Analysis .................................................................. 6 1.1.2 Cross-cutting Risks ........................................................................... 7 2 Coordination Arrangements ............................................................................ 8 2.1 National / Local Authorities’ responsibilities ................................................. 8 2.1.1 Disaster occurrence ......................................................................... 8 2.1.2 Operational procedures ..................................................................... 8 2.2 Humanitarian community: UN AFPs, INGOs and NNGOs ..................................... 9 2.2.1 The cluster approach ........................................................................ 9 2.3 Overview of Emergency Preparedness and Response Partners .... Error! Bookmark not defined. 2.4 Response Matrix................................................................................... 10 ANNEXES (see separate
    [Show full text]
  • Country Profiles
    Global Coalition EDUCATION UNDER ATTACK 2020 GCPEA to Protect Education from Attack COUNTRY PROFILES AFGHANISTAN Attacks on education accelerated in Afghanistan during the reporting period. In 2018, a dramatic rise in attacks on schools occurred, almost half of which were associated with the use of educational facilities for voter registration and polling; polling-related attacks also occurred throughout the 2019 presidential elections process. Threats and attacks against students and education personnel also increased, particularly in areas of the country controlled by non-state armed groups. Context The 2017-2019 reporting period saw increased fighting between theAfghan government, international forces, and non- state armed groups, including the Taliban and the “Islamic State of Khorasan Province” (ISKP) in Afghanistan. In 2019, multiple peace talks between the United States and the Taliban took place in Qatar amidst ongoing fighting, however no peace deal was reached during the reporting period.238 Fighting between armed parties, along with targeted attacks by the Taliban and “ISKP”, caused substantial numbers of civilian casualties.239 In 2019, the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA) recorded 3,403 civilian deaths and 6,989 civilian injuries – the lowest level of civilian casualties recorded since 2013.240 However, significant periods of violence occurred during the year; between July and September 2019, UNAMA recorded the highest number of civilian casualties in a single quarter since 2009.241 Violence particularly impacted young people in 2019, when the UN reported that children comprised 30 percent of all civilian causalities and 78 percent of all casualties from explosive remnants of war (ERW) and landmines.242 Rising insecurity appeared to have a negative effect on school attendance.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taliban Beyond the Pashtuns Antonio Giustozzi
    The Afghanistan Papers | No. 5, July 2010 The Taliban Beyond the Pashtuns Antonio Giustozzi Addressing International Governance Challenges The Centre for International Governance Innovation The Afghanistan Papers ABSTRACT About The Afghanistan Papers Although the Taliban remain a largely Pashtun movement in terms of their composition, they have started making significant inroads among other ethnic groups. In many The Afghanistan Papers, produced by The Centre cases, the Taliban have co-opted, in addition to bandits, for International Governance Innovation disgruntled militia commanders previously linked to other (CIGI), are a signature product of CIGI’s major organizations, and the relationship between them is far research program on Afghanistan. CIGI is from solid. There is also, however, emerging evidence of an independent, nonpartisan think tank that grassroots recruitment of small groups of ideologically addresses international governance challenges. committed Uzbek, Turkmen and Tajik Taliban. While Led by a group of experienced practitioners and even in northern Afghanistan the bulk of the insurgency distinguished academics, CIGI supports research, is still Pashtun, the emerging trend should not be forms networks, advances policy debate, builds underestimated. capacity and generates ideas for multilateral governance improvements. Conducting an active agenda of research, events and publications, CIGI’s interdisciplinary work includes collaboration with policy, business and academic communities around the world. The Afghanistan Papers are essays authored by prominent academics, policy makers, practitioners and informed observers that seek to challenge existing ideas, contribute to ongoing debates and influence international policy on issues related to Afghanistan’s transition. A forward-looking series, the papers combine analysis of current problems and challenges with explorations of future issues and threats.
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012
    AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012 Darwaz AKDN Darwazbala AKDN 2 3 DRAFT Shaki 2 AKDN Kuf Ab AKDN WORK IN PROGRESS 2 Khw2ahan TA J I K I S T A N CAF, Medair Raghistan 3 CAF, Kinder Berg Shighnan Note: WHO supports government in national coverage U Z B E K I S TA N AKDN 5 Darqad Chah Ab CAF 2 Yangi CAF Yawan Kohistan 3 Q3ala 5 Shahri Buzurg CAF CAF, Merlin 1 CAF Qarqin Khwaja BahCaAwF uddin BDN, MOVE 2 CAF, Turkish 4 Yaftal Sufla 2 2 Shortepa Foundation CAF, 6Kinder 3 CHA Berg, Merlin Fayzabad Kham Ab Dashti 1 Sharak Hairatan 2 AKDN1,4 ARCS, Arghanj BDN, MOVE Imam Sahib Qala CAF, ICRC, Shahada Khaw Khani Chahar Mangajek Kaldar ARCS, Merlin CAF Kinder CAF, SHDP 5 Khwaja Du 3 Berg, MoPH CAF Qurghan Bagh 1 MOVE, SAF CHA 13 9 4 3 AADA Koh Mardyan C H I N A AADA 2 2 8 Dashte Archi Rustaq Argo 1 SAF BDN Dawlatabad Khwaja Baha3rak Kinder Berg, 4 CAF, CDAP CAF Kinder Berg, Jawzjan CHA Ghar 5 Merlin Hazar Merlin, SHDP 1 2 Aqcha Qalay-I- Zal CAF Sum1uch Khash 2 Khulm Kunduz Andkhoy BDN Chahar Bolak Balkh Merlin SHDP Kishim Darayim SHDP 2 CA4F, Kinder 3 Qaramqol Khaniqa 7 ARCS, 4 Nahri CHA Kunduz Baharak 3 CAF, AADA Fayzabad ARCS, CHA 12 7 5 23 Berg, Merlin Jurm Warduj AADA 1 BDN, MOVE BDN, CHA, Mazari ShSahraifhi ARCS, Kinder Taluqan Kinder Berg 2 BDN Kinder Berg, SHDP ARCS, Kinder 3 Kinder Berg, AFGA, ARCS, CHA, IAM, Berg, Merlin, Kalfagan 7 Tashkan 3 JACK CHA MoPH, 1B5erg, MoPH, Merlin, 5 AKDN, Shibirghan LEPCO, MoPH, MSI, Chahar Dara SHDP 22 Marmul Spinzar SHDP, Turkish CAF, Kinder Berg, Ishkashiem Afghan turk, Merlin
    [Show full text]
  • AFGHANISTAN Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry FAAHM Food, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Information Management and Policy Unit
    AFGHANISTAN Ministry of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry FAAHM Food, Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Information Management and Policy Unit Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PRODUCTION IN POST-WAR AFGHANISTAN A REPORT ON THE WINTER AGRICULTURAL SURVEY 2002-2003 Hector Maletta - Raphy Favre Kabul, August 2003 With technical support provided by FAO íthrough the Agriculture and Economic Develop- ment Division (ESA) and Emergency Operations and Rehabilitation Division (TCE)í and financial support provided by the United States of America (OSRO/AFG/111/USA), Germany (GCP/AFG/026/GER), and the World Food Programme (Afghanistan Country Office). Executive summary Four fifths of the Afghan population live in rural areas, and most are farmers or farm labourers. The Winter Survey provides an account of the structure of the farming sector and the rural farming population in Afghanistan, with an emphasis on food security. The 2002-2003 crop season in Afghanistan was the first one planted and harvested in relative peace, after the end of a long period of domestic and international strife and political instability, and also the first one after the long drought that afflicted the country since 1999, a plight that in many parts of the country ended only with the Autumn rains in late 2002. After staging a healthy recovery in 2002, but still with many areas under the effects of the drought, agriculture in Afghanistan continued its recovery in the 2002-2003 crop year with a significant increase in areas planted, and an very good harvest. This report is mainly based on a nationwide survey, the Winter Survey (December 2002-January 2003), which covered all the agro-ecological zones and relevant watersheds, interviewing nearly 5000 farmers in more than 500 rural communities.
    [Show full text]
  • Afghanistansalam Watandar Provincial Radio Network Coverage
    AFGHANISTAN Salam Watandar Provincial Radio Network Coverage Area Darwaz 20,516,133 Shiki Population Connected Kuf Ab Disclaimer and Source: This map is compiled by iMMAP and Salam Watandar data of Radio Network Coverage in 2014. Datum/Projection:WGS84/Geographic Khwahan Date created:Sunday, 10/26/2014. iMMAP in Afghanistan is funded byThe United States Agency for International Development (USAID)/ Office Radio Network of U.S. Foreign Disaster Assistance (OFDA). The data, boundaries and names and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by iMMAP or USAID/OFDA. Coverage All information is the best available at the time this map was produced. For copies or information regarding Ragh specific data sources and methodology: [email protected] Khamyab Shighnan Coverage Data Source : Salam Watandar Radio Network Yangi Qala Kohistan Qarqin Population Data Source: Salam Watandar Radio Network Darqad Chah Ab Arghanj Khwa Shortepa Yaftali Sufla Hayratan Kaldar Imam Sahib Dashti Qala Rustaq Badakhshan Archi B a d a k h s h a n Shuhada Argo Khani Chahar Bagh Mardyan Dawlatabad Qala-I-Zal Darayim Qurghan J a w z j a n Aqcha Wakhan Hazar Sumuch Tishkan Warduj Qaramqol Khaniqa Jurm Khwaja Du Koh Fayzabad K u n d u z Baharak Kishim Balkh Takhar Dihdadi Khulm Chahar Dara Khan Abad Ishkashim Jawzjan Chimtal Bangi Ta k h a r B a l k h Tagab (Kishmi Bala) Marmul Farkhar Feroz Nakhchir Chal Zebak Aliabad Hazrati Sultan Dawlatabad Chahar Kint Yamgan (Girwan) Ishkamish Sholgara Shirin Tagab Samangan Sari Pul Burka Guzargahi
    [Show full text]
  • Livelihood Trajectories in Afghanistan: Evidence from Three Villages in Herat Province
    Researching livelihoods and services affected by conflict Livelihood trajectories in Afghanistan: evidence from three villages in Herat Province Working Paper 54 Danielle Huot, Adam Pain and Ihsanullah Ghafoori December 2016 Funded by the EC About us Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) aims to generate a stronger evidence base on how people make a living, educate their children, deal with illness and access other basic services in conflict-affected situations. Providing better access to basic services, social protection and support to livelihoods matters for the human welfare of people affected by conflict, the achievement of development targets such as the Sustainable Development Goals and international efforts at peace- and state-building. At the centre of SLRC’s research are three core themes, developed over the course of an intensive one- year inception phase: § State legitimacy: experiences, perceptions and expectations of the state and local governance in conflict-affected situations § State capacity: building effective states that deliver services and social protection in conflict- affected situations § Livelihood trajectories and economic activity under conflict The Overseas Development Institute (ODI) is the lead organisation. SLRC partners include the Centre for Poverty Analysis (CEPA) in Sri Lanka, Feinstein International Center (FIC, Tufts University), the Afghanistan Research and Evaluation Unit (AREU), the Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) in Pakistan, Disaster Studies of Wageningen University (WUR) in the Netherlands, the Nepal Centre for Contemporary Research (NCCR), and the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium SLRC Working Papers present information, analysis and key policy Overseas Development Institute recommendations on issues relating to livelihoods, basic services 203 Blackfriars Road and social protection in conflict affected situations.
    [Show full text]