AFGHANISTAN: Health Organizations in Districts (3W) October 2012
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar
Justice & Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar M AY 2014 Above: Behsud Bridge, Nangarhar Province (Photo by TLO) A TLO M A P P I N G R EPORT Justice and Security Practices, Perceptions, and Problems in Kabul and Nangarhar May 2014 In Cooperation with: © 2014, The Liaison Office. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, recording or otherwise without prior written permission of the publisher, The Liaison Office. Permission can be obtained by emailing [email protected] ii Acknowledgements This report was commissioned from The Liaison Office (TLO) by Cordaid’s Security and Justice Business Unit. Research was conducted via cooperation between the Afghan Women’s Resource Centre (AWRC) and TLO, under the supervision and lead of the latter. Cordaid was involved in the development of the research tools and also conducted capacity building by providing trainings to the researchers on the research methodology. While TLO makes all efforts to review and verify field data prior to publication, some factual inaccuracies may still remain. TLO and AWRC are solely responsible for possible inaccuracies in the information presented. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in the report are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Cordaid. The Liaison Office (TL0) The Liaison Office (TLO) is an independent Afghan non-governmental organization established in 2003 seeking to improve local governance, stability and security through systematic and institutionalized engagement with customary structures, local communities, and civil society groups. -
Community- Based Needs Assessment Highlights
COMMUNITY- BASED NEEDS ASSESSMENT SUMMARY RESULTS PILOT ▪ KABUL As more IDPs and returnees urbanize and flock to cities, like Kabul, in search of livelihoods and security, it puts a strain on already overstretched resources. Water levels in Kabul have dramatically decreased, MAY – JUN 2018 forcing people to wait for hours each day to gather drinking water. © IOM 2018 ABOUT DTM The Displacement Tracking Matrix (DTM) is a system that HIGHLIGHTS tracks and monitors displacement and population mobility. It is districts assessed designed to regularly and systematically capture, process and 9 disseminate information to provide a better understanding of 201settlements with largest IDP and return the movements and evolving needs of displaced populations, populations assessed whether on site or en route. 828 In coordination with the Ministry of Refugees and Repatriation key informants interviewed (MoRR), in May through June 2018, DTM in Afghanistan piloted a Community-Based Needs Assessment (CBNA), intended as an 1,744,347 integral component of DTM's Baseline Mobility Assessment to individuals reside in the assessed settlements provide a more comprehensive view of multi-sectoral needs in settlements hosting IDPs and returnees. DTM conducted 117,023 the CBNA pilot at the settlement level, prioritizing settlements residents (13%) are returnees from abroad hosting the largest numbers of returnees and IDPs, in seven target 111,700 provinces of highest displacement and return, as determined by IDPs currently in host communities the round 5 Baseline Mobility Assessments results completed in mid-May 2018. DTM’s field enumerators administered the inter- 6,748 sectoral needs survey primarily through community focus group residents fled as IDPs discussions with key informants, knowledgeable about the living conditions, economic situation, access to multi-sectoral 21,290 services, security and safety, and food and nutrition, among residents (14%) are former IDPs who returned home other subjects. -
AFGHANISTAN - Base Map KYRGYZSTAN
AFGHANISTAN - Base map KYRGYZSTAN CHINA ± UZBEKISTAN Darwaz !( !( Darwaz-e-balla Shaki !( Kof Ab !( Khwahan TAJIKISTAN !( Yangi Shighnan Khamyab Yawan!( !( !( Shor Khwaja Qala !( TURKMENISTAN Qarqin !( Chah Ab !( Kohestan !( Tepa Bahwddin!( !( !( Emam !( Shahr-e-buzorg Hayratan Darqad Yaftal-e-sufla!( !( !( !( Saheb Mingajik Mardyan Dawlat !( Dasht-e-archi!( Faiz Abad Andkhoy Kaldar !( !( Argo !( Qaram (1) (1) Abad Qala-e-zal Khwaja Ghar !( Rostaq !( Khash Aryan!( (1) (2)!( !( !( Fayz !( (1) !( !( !( Wakhan !( Khan-e-char Char !( Baharak (1) !( LEGEND Qol!( !( !( Jorm !( Bagh Khanaqa !( Abad Bulak Char Baharak Kishim!( !( Teer Qorghan !( Aqcha!( !( Taloqan !( Khwaja Balkh!( !( Mazar-e-sharif Darah !( BADAKHSHAN Garan Eshkashem )"" !( Kunduz!( !( Capital Do Koh Deh !(Dadi !( !( Baba Yadgar Khulm !( !( Kalafgan !( Shiberghan KUNDUZ Ali Khan Bangi Chal!( Zebak Marmol !( !( Farkhar Yamgan !( Admin 1 capital BALKH Hazrat-e-!( Abad (2) !( Abad (2) !( !( Shirin !( !( Dowlatabad !( Sholgareh!( Char Sultan !( !( TAKHAR Mir Kan Admin 2 capital Tagab !( Sar-e-pul Kent Samangan (aybak) Burka Khwaja!( Dahi Warsaj Tawakuli Keshendeh (1) Baghlan-e-jadid !( !( !( Koran Wa International boundary Sabzposh !( Sozma !( Yahya Mussa !( Sayad !( !( Nahrin !( Monjan !( !( Awlad Darah Khuram Wa Sarbagh !( !( Jammu Kashmir Almar Maymana Qala Zari !( Pul-e- Khumri !( Murad Shahr !( !( (darz !( Sang(san)charak!( !( !( Suf-e- (2) !( Dahana-e-ghory Khowst Wa Fereng !( !( Ab) Gosfandi Way Payin Deh Line of control Ghormach Bil Kohestanat BAGHLAN Bala !( Qaysar !( Balaq -
Contamination Status of Districts in Afghanistan
C O N T A M I N A T I O N S T A T U S O F D I S T R I C T S I N A F G H A N I S T A N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? As of 31st March 2019 ? ? ? ? ? T A J I K I S T A N ? ? ? ? ? ? ? U Z B E K I S T A N ? Shaki Darwazbala Darwaz ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? K? uf Ab N Khwahan A Raghistan Shighnan ? T Darqad Yawan ? Yangi Shahri Qala Kohistan ? S ? Buzurg ? Khwaja Chah Ab Bahawuddin Kham Shortepa Yaftal Sufla Wakhan I Qarqin ? Dashti ? ? Arghanj ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Ab ? ? ? Qala ? ? ? ? ? Khani ? ? Fayzabad Khaw ? Imam Sahib ? ? ? N Mangajek Kaldar ? ? Chahar !. ? ? ? ? ? Shahada ? ? ? ? ? ? Khwaja Du Koh ? ? Dawlatabad Argo Faizabad ? Mardyan Dashte ? ? ? Bagh ? ? ? ? ? ? ? C H I N A Qurghan ? Takhar E ? Khwaja ? ? Baharak ? Rustaq ? Archi ? ? ? Hazar ? ? Badakhs han Nahri ? Aqcha Ghar ? Andkhoy ? Kunduz ? ? Sumu? ch Khash ? ? Shahi ? ? ? ? ? Balkh ? Baharak M ? Jawzjan Qalay-I- Zal ? ? Darayim Chahar Khulm Is hkashiem ? ? ? ? Kunduz ? Kalfagan Qaramqol Khaniqa ? ? ? ? ? ? Bolak ? Kishim ? Warduj ? Jurm ? ? ? !. ? Mazar-e Sharif ? !. ? ? ? ? ? ? K ? ? ? ? ? ? Taloqa? n ? ? Taluqan She be rg han ? !. ? ? ? ? ? ? Tashkan ? ? ? ? !. ? ? ? ? ? ? Dihdadi ? ? ? Marmul ? ? ? Chahar Dara ? ? ? Fayzabad ? ? Kunduz ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? R ? Bangi Khanabad ? ? Tagab Namak ? Aliabad ? Chimtal ? Dawlatabad ? ? (Kishmi Feroz ? Hazrati ? ? Chal Shibirghan ? ? Ab ? Farkhar Yamgan ? ? ? ? ? U Sari Pul Balkh Nakhchir Su? ltan Bala) Zebak ? ? Chahar ? (Girwan) ? Baghlani ? Ishkamish ? ? ? ? ? ? Kint ? ? ? ? ? ? Sholgara ? ? ? ? ? -
AFGHANISTAN: Humanitarian Operational Presence (3W) Western Region (October to December 2018)
AFGHANISTAN: Humanitarian Operational Presence (3W) Western Region (October to December 2018) All Clusters Ghormach 1 Number of organisations reported Bala per district Murghab 4 1 - 2 Gulran Kushk-e-Kuhna 1 3 - 10 2 Muqur Badghis Ab Charsadra Kushk 6 11 - 20 Kamari 7 > 20 Kohsan 5 5 Jawand 9 Qadis 2 No organisation reported Qala-e-Naw 3 Injil 15 Feroz Koh Karukh Lal Wa 25 5 Dawlatyar 8 Sarjangal Hirat Hirat 5 Obe Chisht-e-Sharif 5 28 2 Ghoryan Pashtun 2 Shahrak 3 Guzara Zarghun Zindajan 5 Ghor 7 11 2 Tolak DoLayna 4 6 Farsi Adraskan 2 3 Saghar Pasaband 1 1 Taywarah 2 Shindand 1 Pur Chaman Khak-e-Safed 1 1 Anar Dara Bala Buluk 2 2 Qala-e-Kah Pushtrod Farah Gulistan 1 1 1 Farah Kabul Shibkoh 9 Bakwa 2 1 Lash-e-Juwayn 2 46 organisations Delivering humanitarian services in October, November and December 2018. Emergency Shelter and Non-Food Items Food Security Health 1 2 2 1 1 3 1 1 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 2 3 5 2 2 1 3 1 1 1 3 1 8 5 4 2 3 1 3 2 2 3 3 4 1 1 1 8 2 4 8 2 1 1 6 1 2 3 1 5 1 2 4 5 1 2 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 3 2 2 1 2 13 organisations 19 organisations 6 organisations Nutrition Protection Water, Sanitation and Hygiene 1 1 1 1 4 1 2 2 2 4 7 1 1 2 1 1 6 1 6 9 3 1 4 1 3 1 1 1 1 16 2 1 3 3 2 1 2 2 2 5 1 20 1 1 1 2 6 2 1 1 1 1 5 3 10 organisations 26 organisations 10 organisations Operational Presence is defined as: Organisations with a physical presence on the ground and active in delivering humanitarian assistance in the districts during October, November and December 2018. -
ERM Household Assessment Report
ERM Household Assessment Report Kunduz Province- Sar i Dawra, Rustaq Abad, Bandar Imam Sahib, Bandar Assessment Location: Kabul, Bandar Khan Abad, Zakhil, Say Darak, Char Taq, Naw Abad Andarabi Ha, Chil Dukhtaran, Type of crises: Conflict Kunduz Province, Dashti Archi, Qala i Zall, Ali Abad, Kunduz around Crisis Location: districts, and Kunar province Ghazi Abad district Assessment Team: ACTED, DACAAR, ADA, CTG/WFP, HI, and Local DoRR Crisis date: 09 November 2018 Date of Notification: 11 November 2018 Date of Assessment: From 15 November to 03 December 2018 HHs: Families: Individuals: Affected Population: 115 115 782 Electronic Hardcopy Data collection method X 1. Findings And Recommendations In Brief On 09 Nov 2018, Taliban groups launched operations in Kunduz province, AOGs attacked in Dashti Archi, and Qala e Zall, as well in Char Dara, Ali Abad and in Kunduz center around villages. As a consequence, a large number of families have been displaced from their places of origin to Kunduz city. These families are currently living primarily with relatives and in rental houses with many unmet humanitarian needs. Surprisingly, families from Kunar province, Ghazi Abad district also reached Kunduz centre as a result of conflict between ISIS and ANSF – a quite unusual displacement pattern. An OCT meeting was organized on 13 November 2018 with NGO, Government and UN partners in ACTED office Kunduz province. Five Joint Assessment Teams (JATs) were formed, with staff from ACTED, WFP, DACAAR, ADA, HI and the local DoRR in order to assess Internally Displaced People (IDPs) families. Most Households in this caseload are primarily from Dashti Archi and Qala I Zall district, 63 households are belong to Dashti Archi district, 31 households are belong to Qala I Zall district, 6 households belong to Ali Abad district, 5 households belong to Char dara district, one household belong to Imam Sahib district, 3 households belong to Kunduz around districts and 6 households belong to Ghazi Abad district of Kunar province. -
(2): Delivering Public Services in Insurgency-Affected Obeh District of Herat Province
One Land, Two Rules (2): Delivering public services in insurgency-affected Obeh district of Herat province Author : S Reza Kazemi Published: 9 December 2018 Downloaded: 8 December 2018 Download URL: https://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/wp-admin/post.php The matter of who governs the district of Obeh in the east of Herat province is complicated: control of the district is divided between the Afghan government and the Taleban, and shifts in unpredictable ways. The inhabitants of the district, usually via the mediation of elders, have had to learn how to deal with both sides. The dual nature of authority in Obeh is exemplified by public service delivery; it is always financed through and administered by the Afghan state but, in areas under Taleban control, it is the insurgents who supervise and monitor delivery. In this, the first of a series of case studies looking at the delivery of services in districts over which the Taleban have control or influence, AAN researcher Said Reza Kazemi investigates the provision of governance and security, education, health, electricity, telecommunications and development projects, and unpacks a dual form of governance. Service Delivery in Insurgent-Affected Areas is a joint research project by the Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN) and the United States Institute of Peace (USIP). For the methodology and literature review, see here. Obeh district: the context 1 / 22 Approximately 100 km to the east of Herat city, linked by mainly non-asphalted roads; mountainous, cut through by fertile Harirud River valley -
Left in the Dark
LEFT IN THE DARK FAILURES OF ACCOUNTABILITY FOR CIVILIAN CASUALTIES CAUSED BY INTERNATIONAL MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFGHANISTAN Amnesty International is a global movement of more than 3 million supporters, members and activists in more than 150 countries and territories who campaign to end grave abuses of human rights. Our vision is for every person to enjoy all the rights enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other international human rights standards. We are independent of any government, political ideology, economic interest or religion and are funded mainly by our membership and public donations. First published in 2014 by Amnesty International Ltd Peter Benenson House 1 Easton Street London WC1X 0DW United Kingdom © Amnesty International 2014 Index: ASA 11/006/2014 Original language: English Printed by Amnesty International, International Secretariat, United Kingdom All rights reserved. This publication is copyright, but may be reproduced by any method without fee for advocacy, campaigning and teaching purposes, but not for resale. The copyright holders request that all such use be registered with them for impact assessment purposes. For copying in any other circumstances, or for reuse in other publications, or for translation or adaptation, prior written permission must be obtained from the publishers, and a fee may be payable. To request permission, or for any other inquiries, please contact [email protected] Cover photo: Bodies of women who were killed in a September 2012 US airstrike are brought to a hospital in the Alingar district of Laghman province. © ASSOCIATED PRESS/Khalid Khan amnesty.org CONTENTS MAP OF AFGHANISTAN .......................................................................................... 6 1. SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... 7 Methodology .......................................................................................................... -
A Long Way Home: Obstacles and Opportunities for IDP Return In
A long way home: obstacles and opportunities for IDP return in Afghanistan December 2019 This report was written for ADSP by Samuel Hall, a social enterprise providing research and analysis in countries affected by issues of migration and displacement. Samuel Hall would like to thank the ADSP project team, in particular Anna Stein, for their support and feedback. Most crucially, thank you to all of the displaced families, returnees, and community members who participated in this research and agreed to share their stories in spite of the difficulties they have faced. To protect their anonymity all names in this report have been changed. Key informant interviewees are identified as representatives of the organisation they work for. This research was led by Dr. Nassim Majidi and Camille Kasavan, with the support of Jawid Hassanzai, Abdul Basir Mohmand, Ibrahim Ramazani, Saida Azimi, Hakimullah Atiqee and Melad Kakar. ADSP | 2019 2 A LONG WAY HOME: OBSTACLES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR IDP RETURN IN AFGHANISTAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Glossary and abbreviations 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SYNTHESIS REPORT 9 CASE STUDIES 27 Nangarhar case study 27 Badghis case study 35 Helmand case study 43 Badakhshan case study 51 Kunduz case study 58 Samangan case study 66 Date of production December 2019 Acknowledgements The study was commissioned using funding from DANIDA and the European Union’s Civil Protection and Humanitarian Aid department. The views set out in this report are those of the authors and do not reflect the official opinion of DANIDA, the EU, ADSP or its -
Maah/Mrrd/Fao/Wfp National Crop Output Assessment
FAO FAAHM/AFGHANISTAN OSRO/AFG/111/USA MAAH/MRRD/FAO/WFP NATIONAL CROP OUTPUT ASSESSMENT 10th May to 5th June 2003 Farmer met in Badghis while weeding his rain-fed wheat field, 23 May 2003. Raphy Favre, FAO/FAIT Agronomist Consultant, Mission TL Anthony Fitzherbert, FAO Consultant Javier Escobedo, FAO Emergency Agronomist Consultant 25th July 2003 Kabul TABLE OF CONTENT I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. INTRODUCTION III. METHODOLOGY 1. Estimation of Yield 1.1 Field Measurements for Yield Estimates 1.2 Crop Development Stage at the Time of the Assessment 1.3 Interviews with Farmers in the Field 1.4 Selection of Districts and Transects 1.5 Selection of Fields 2. Estimation of Land planted 3. Market Prices IV. RESULTS 4. Estimated Planted Area 4.1 Irrigated Land 4.2 Rain-fed Land 5. Estimated Wheat Yield 5.1 Irrigated Land 5.2 Rain-fed Land 6. Estimated Wheat Production 6.1 Irrigated Land 6.2 Rain-fed Land 6.3 Total Production 6.4 Agricultural Constraints in 2003 7. Estimated Barley Production at Regional Level 8. Wheat Grain Prices V. CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS ANNEXES ANNEX I - Changes of the Itinerary and Teams Composition due to Security Situation in Southern Afghanistan ANNEX II - Participants ANNEX III - Mission Itinerary and Districts covered by the Survey 2 TABLES Table 1: Estimated irrigated cultivated land in 2003; Total irrigated land cultivated In 2003, irrigated Wheat cultivated and irrigated Barley cultivated in 2003. Table 2: Estimated rain-fed cultivated land in 2003; Total rain-fed land cultivated in 2003, rain-fed Wheat cultivated and rain-fed Barley cultivated in 2003. -
Daily Situation Report 31 October 2010 Safety and Security Issues Relevant to Sssi Personnel and Clients
Strategic SSI - Afghanistan DAILY SITUATION REPORT 31 OCTOBER 2010 SAFETY AND SECURITY ISSUES RELEVANT TO SSSI PERSONNEL AND CLIENTS STANDING THREAT ASSESSMENT (KABUL): Threat reports continue to indicate that insurgents aspire to conduct coordinated attacks in Kabul City, as such the threat remains extant. Recent threat reporting has also indicated likely reconnaissance of areas and businesses frequented by members of the international community. Although no significant attacks were carried out in Kabul during the recent parliamentary election, or indeed after the event, the recent reduction in physical security in the city may provide insurgents with exploitable opportunities to carry out attacks. Suicide and complex attacks remain the preferred choice for insurgents in order to gain maximum casualties figures and the associated high degree of media attention. It remains possible that insurgents will still seek to undermine the democratic process by conducting high profile attacks when the final results are announced at the end of October. It remains prudent for international agencies in the Kabul area to maintain a high degree of security vigilance. Sporadic IDF attacks in the city centre are to be expected. Any attacks are likely to consist of between one and four 107 mm rockets launched towards the city centre. Incidents of intimidation, executions by insurgents and targeting of government officials are increasing throughout the country. It seems to be a form of revenge by insurgents as they have lost more than 300 insurgent commanders over the past few months due to successful IM/ANSF operations. MAJOR COUNTRY WIDE EVENTS Herat: Influencial local Tribal Leader killed by insurgents Nangarhar: Five attacks against Border Police OPs Helmand: Five local residents murdered Privileged and Confidential This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. -
19 October 2020 "Generated on Refers to the Date on Which the User Accessed the List and Not the Last Date of Substantive Update to the List
Res. 1988 (2011) List The List established and maintained pursuant to Security Council res. 1988 (2011) Generated on: 19 October 2020 "Generated on refers to the date on which the user accessed the list and not the last date of substantive update to the list. Information on the substantive list updates are provided on the Council / Committee’s website." Composition of the List The list consists of the two sections specified below: A. Individuals B. Entities and other groups Information about de-listing may be found at: https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/ombudsperson (for res. 1267) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/sanctions/delisting (for other Committees) https://www.un.org/securitycouncil/content/2231/list (for res. 2231) A. Individuals TAi.155 Name: 1: ABDUL AZIZ 2: ABBASIN 3: na 4: na ﻋﺒﺪ اﻟﻌﺰﻳﺰ ﻋﺒﺎﺳﯿﻦ :(Name (original script Title: na Designation: na DOB: 1969 POB: Sheykhan Village, Pirkowti Area, Orgun District, Paktika Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: Abdul Aziz Mahsud Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: na Passport no: na National identification no: na Address: na Listed on: 4 Oct. 2011 (amended on 22 Apr. 2013) Other information: Key commander in the Haqqani Network (TAe.012) under Sirajuddin Jallaloudine Haqqani (TAi.144). Taliban Shadow Governor for Orgun District, Paktika Province as of early 2010. Operated a training camp for non- Afghan fighters in Paktika Province. Has been involved in the transport of weapons to Afghanistan. INTERPOL- UN Security Council Special Notice web link: https://www.interpol.int/en/How-we-work/Notices/View-UN-Notices- Individuals click here TAi.121 Name: 1: AZIZIRAHMAN 2: ABDUL AHAD 3: na 4: na ﻋﺰﯾﺰ اﻟﺮﺣﻤﺎن ﻋﺒﺪ اﻻﺣﺪ :(Name (original script Title: Mr Designation: Third Secretary, Taliban Embassy, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates DOB: 1972 POB: Shega District, Kandahar Province, Afghanistan Good quality a.k.a.: na Low quality a.k.a.: na Nationality: Afghanistan Passport no: na National identification no: Afghan national identification card (tazkira) number 44323 na Address: na Listed on: 25 Jan.