DOCSLIB.ORG

The New York and the Josephine: Two Steamships of the Charles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The New York and the Josephine: Two Steamships of the Charles The New York and the Josephine: whose energy, "can-do" attitude, Two Steamships of the forcefulness and, sometimes, Charles Morgan Line ruthlessness came to symbolize the American spirit. Men such as Cornelius Jack B. Irion and David A. Ball Vanderbilt and Jay Gould drove the American economy and decided America's economic future. Such a man Introduction also, was Charles Morgan, whose During much of the 19th century, New influence on the process of resource Orleans, the "Queen of the South," vied allocation and economic development with northern cities such as Boston for can still be felt in the Gulf South over the spot behind New York as the second 100 years later. busiest port in the United States. It can be argued that the Crescent City rode to Charles Morgan this distinction on a cloud of steam since One of the foremost figures in the it was only after the introduction of the development of the steamship trade steamboat in Louisiana waters in 1811 along the Gulf Coast of the United States that vessels could easily stem the current was not a Southerner at all, but a New of the Mississippi to reach the city's York businessman, Charles Morgan wharves over 95 miles from the river's (Figure 1). Morgan was born in mouth. Prior to that, the major water route into the city followed shallow water passages through the Rigolets into Lake Pontchartrain and down Bayou St. John to the Mississippi River. With the introduction of the steam engine, vessels could travel directly from the Gulf of Mexico up the deep channel of the Mississippi to the very front door of the city, drastically reducing the time required by sail. In addition, freed of the vagaries of wind and tide, shipping agents could, for the first time, offer customers a regular and dependable schedule of departures and arrivals. This, in turn, encouraged the development of such things as tourism, the transshipment of fresh produce, and the expansion of settlement into frontier Figure 1 - Charles Morgan areas. Killingsworth, Connecticut, on April 21, 1795. At the tender age of 14, young In an era of American history before it Charles traveled to New York City to became the responsibility of government take a position as a grocery clerk. to undertake great transportation Opportunities abounded for ambitious projects, these fell to private individuals young men in the bustling port of New York and by age 20 Morgan was States mail. Prior to the Civil War, he proprietor of a ship chandlery and soon also ran mail service from New Orleans thereafter began importing goods from to Veracruz, Mexico. The Veracruz the southern United States and the West route originally began as part of the Indies. Mexican Ocean Mail Company, which was to provide mail service from New Morgan developed interests in merchant Orleans to San Francisco via Mexico. shipping in the 1830s. During his career, However, this venture never materialized he established the first regular steamship (Baughman 1968:92). By 1855 route between New York and Morgan’s Southern Steamship Company Charleston, started the first steamship established routes between New Orleans, business in Texas (which brought the Galveston, and Port Lavaca, and by 1860 first steamship to the Gulf of Mexico), Morgan was operating six regular routes had ties to the Pacific merchant in the Gulf (Baughman 1968:95-104). steamship trade, and also had interests in merchant shipping in Central America In addition to his vast steamship and Mexico (Dayton and Adams interests, Morgan also developed a 1970:412-418). lucrative ironworks company. The Morgan Iron Works company, located in Morgan’s first venture as a shipping New York City, became one of the magnate began with the formation of the leading producers of marine steam New York and Charleston Steam Packet engines in the United States in the mid- Company, of which he was a partial 19th century. The company provided owner. The company ran steamships steam engines for many of the Atlantic between Charleston, South Carolina, and coastal steamers. It also equipped most New York City. By the mid 1830s of the ships employed by Morgan, as Morgan bought out the other partners well as many of the American-owned and established the Southern Steam steamships operating in China. At its Packet Company. This company peak, the company employed over 1,000 prospered under the direction of Morgan men (Dayton and Adams 1970:384-386). and acquired government contracts to transport U.S. troops and supplies to During the Civil War, the Morgan Iron Florida during the Florida Indian Wars. Works supplied machinery for several Morgan’s company also secured the Union naval vessels and also constructed weekly mail contract from New York to the Union Monitor class ironclad Charleston. By the late 1830s he Onondaga. After most of his Gulf coast expanded his interests to the Gulf coast ships were commandeered by the (Pearson and Simmons 1995:57). Confederate Navy, the Southern Though Morgan lost about ten vessels in Steamship Company ceased operations the process, he established the first in 1863 (Baughman 1968:120). A few regular steamship service in Texas in the of his remaining Gulf coast steamers, late 1830s (Dayton and Adams 1970) however, operated as blockade runners during the war. Always one to profit Among the regular cargo shipped on from opportunity, Morgan arranged for Morgan’s Gulf coastline was the United the construction of five new vessels at 2 the Harlan and Hollingsworth facilities words, the modern mixed economy between 1862 and 1864. These ships evolved as a result of achievements of operated as Federal charter vessels. men such as Charles Morgan. After the Civil War, Morgan’s interests returned to the Gulf of Mexico and Remains of an Empire within four years had surpassed his pre- Of the 117 steamships owned by Charles war holdings (Baughman 1968:131). Morgan or his corporate enterprises between 1833 and 1885, the wrecks of Morgan's greatest goal after the Civil three have been discovered in the Gulf of War was to develop a unified system of Mexico or contiguous waters. One of steamship and rail lines that would these, the Mary, was recorded by connect the Gulf southwest with the archaeologists off Aransas Pass, Texas, Mississippi Valley, northern Latin in 1995 (Pearson and Simmons 1995). America, and the Atlantic and Pacific The U.S. Department of the Interior's coasts (Baughman 1968:208). Between Minerals Management Service (MMS) 1877 and 1885, Morgan realized much has documented two others, the New of his dream. The initial step was taken York and the Josephine. Taken together, by the newly elected Democratic these two vessels represent the span of legislature of 1877, which chartered steamships employed by the Morgan Morgan's Louisiana and Texas Railroad Line and document the changing and Steamship Company (M.L. & T.R. technology of steam navigation in the & S.), giving him the widest possible United States. latitude to extend rail lines throughout Louisiana and Texas, to connect to The New York: Construction and existing lines, and to own and operate Employment his ships. Built in 1837, the side-wheel steamer New York was among the first vessels of Charles Morgan died at the age of 83 in America's first coastal steam packet line, 1878 at the zenith of his company's the New York and Charleston Steam power and influence. The M.L. & T.R. Packet Company, which was run in & S. lived on briefly in the capable partnership by James P. Allaire, John hands of Morgan's son-in-law and heir, Haggerty, and Charles Morgan (Figure Charles Whitney, until his death in 1882. 2). That same year, with the fledgling Between the death of Charles Whitney and the railroad consolidation movement of the 1880s, the Morgan Line ceased to exist as a family enterprise by 1885. The mark that it left on the economic history of the Gulf South and on the United States was indelible. During the span of Morgan's lifetime, the public had come to take the existence of transportation for granted, and national and state Figure 2 - The Steamship New York. Photo governments undertook projects that had courtesy The Mariner’s Museum, Newport News, been left to private initiative. In other Virginia. 3 company hardly off the ground, the (Hogan 1942:6). Steerage passengers partners faced their first major setback, were provided with curtained off berths the loss of their flagship, the Home, for sleeping below decks and were along with 99 passengers and crew. This allowed the freedom of the awninged tragedy and the ensuing public outcry decks during the day so long as they forced a reorganization of the line with controlled their "loud discourse" and did Allaire withdrawing from the partnership not disturb the more affluent passengers and leaving Morgan the managing in the main cabin (Baughman 1968:27). partner of both the New York and the Unlike most of Morgan's later vessels, Columbia, another steamer. Partly the 365-ton New York was wooden- because of the bad publicity resulting hulled. It was built in the yard of from the loss of the Home, Morgan William H. Brown of New York and was became interested in establishing a equipped with a crosshead engine from regular trade route between New Orleans the Allaire Works, owned by Morgan's and Texas, which had only recently former partner John P. Allaire (Heyl gained its independence from Mexico. 1963:225). The registered dimensions of Both Morgan and Haggerty had invested the vessel are 160'6" by 22'6" with a in sailing packets to New Orleans for depth of hold of 10'6" (Vessel years and Haggerty was already Registration No.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Propulsion of Sea Ships – in the Past, Present and Future –
    The Propulsion of Sea Ships – in the Past, Present and Future – (Speech by Bernd Röder on the occasion of the VHT General Meeting on 11.12.2008) To prepare for today’s topic, more specifically for the topic: ship propulsion of the future, I did what every reasonable person would have done in my situation if he should have a look into the future – I dug out our VHT crystal ball. As you know, our crystal ball is a reliable and cost-efficient resource which we have been using for a long time with great suc- cess. Among other things, we’ve been using it to provide you with the repair costs or their duration or the probable claims experience of a policy, etc. or to create short-term damage statistics, as well. So, I asked the crystal ball: What does ship propulsion of the future look like? Every future and all statistics lie in the crystal ball I must, however, admit that what I saw there was somewhat irritating, and it led me to only the one conclusion – namely, that we’re taking a look into the very distant future at a time in which humanity has not only used up all of the oil reserves but also the entire wind. This time, we’re not really going to get any further with the crystal ball. Ship propulsion of the future or 'back to the roots'? But, sometimes it helps to have a look into the past to be able to say something about the fu- ture. According to the principle, draw a line connecting the distant past to today and simply extend it into the future.
    [Show full text]
  • 01 Why Did the United States Enter World War I
    DBQ Why did the United States Enter World War I? DIRECTIONS: Read all the following documents and answer the questions in full sentences on a separate sheet of paper. Label each set of questions with the title and number of the document first. Be sure that your answers include specific outside information, details, and analysis. You may consult your class notes, homework, or textbook for help with any question. Whatever you do not finish in class you will have for homework. Document 1 The Lusitania, The Arabic Pledge, The Sussex Pledge and Unrestricted Submarine Warfare On May 7, 1915, a German U-boat sank the British ship Lusitania off the coast of Ireland. The Germans attacked the Lusitania without warning, leading to the deaths of 1,198 people, including 128 Americans. President Woodrow Wilson, outraged at Germany’s violation of the United States’ neutral rights, threatened to end diplomacy with Germany. Still, many Americans opposed war, and a large number of German-Americans favored the Central Powers. Germany continued submarine warfare. In August of 1915, another U-boat torpedoed the British passenger liner Arabic, killing approximately forty passengers and crew, including two Americans. Afraid that the U.S. might now enter the war on the side of the Allied Powers, the German government issued the Arabic Pledge in 1915. Germany promised that it would warn non-military ships thirty minutes before it sank them. This would allow passengers and crew time to escape safely on lifeboats. Germany, though, broke the Arabic Pledge in March of 1916, when a U-boat torpedoed the French ship Sussex.
    [Show full text]
  • S.S. Badger Engines and Boilers
    S.S. BADGER ENGINES AND BOILERS Historic Mechanical Engineering Landmark Ludington, Michigan September 7, 1996 The American Society of Mechanical Engineers THE HISTORY AND HERITAGE PROGRAM OF ASME The ASME History and Heritage Recognition Program began in September 1971. To implement and achieve its goals, ASME formed a History and Heritage Committee, composed of mechanical engineers, historians of technology, and the Curator Emeritus of Mechanical and Civil Engineering at the Smithsonian Institution. The Committee provides a public service by examining, noting, recording, and acknowledging mechanical engineering achievements of particular significance. The History and Heritage Committee is part of the ASME Council on Public Affairs and Board on Public Information. For further information, please contact Public Information, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017- 2392, 212-705-7740, fax 212-705-7143. An ASME landmark represents a progressive step in the evolution of mechanical engineering. Site designations note an event of development of clear historical importance to mechanical engineers. Collections mark the contributions of several objects with special significance to the historical development of mechanical engineering. The ASME Historic Mechanical Engineering Recognition Program illuminates our technological heritage and serves to encourage the preservation of the physical remains of historically important works. It provides an annotated roster for engineers, students, educators, historians, and travelers, and helps establish persistent reminders of where we have been and where we are going along the divergent paths of discovery. HISTORIC MECHANICAL ENGINEERING LANDMARK S.S. BADGER ENGINES AND BOILERS 1952 THE TWO 3,500-HP STEEPLE COMPOUND UNAFLOW STEAM ENGINES POWERING THE S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of the Meeting of the Woods Hole, Martha's
    SUMMARY OF THE MEETING OF THE WOODS HOLE, MARTHA’S VINEYARD AND NANTUCKET STEAMSHIP AUTHORITY January 16, 2018 The Members of the Woods Hole, Martha's Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority (“SSA”) held their monthly meeting at 10:00 a.m. on January 16, 2018, in the Cultural Center of the Falmouth Historical Society’s Museums on the Green, located at 55 Palmer Avenue, Falmouth, Massachusetts. All five Board Members were in attendance: Chairman Robert F. Ranney (Nantucket); Vice Chairman Robert R. Jones (Barnstable); Secretary Marc N. Hanover (Martha's Vineyard) (who participated remotely by telephone conference call); Elizabeth H. Gladfelter (Falmouth); and Moira E. Tierney (New Bedford). 1. SSA General Manager Robert B. Davis reported that the SSA has been addressing some open items with respect to the temporary Woods Hole terminal building since it opened for use on December 4th. Indoor/outdoor carpeting has been installed on the decking in order to keep it from being slippery and, based upon how it works over the winter, the SSA will determine next spring whether the carpeting is only going to be a temporary measure or a permanent solution. In addition, the contractor has finished installing the air curtains for both sets of doors to the lobby. Mr. Davis recounted how, on Christmas Day, a storm had knocked a string of lights down so that they were hanging in front of the north lobby door, causing the door to open and close constantly. The open doors allowed the wind to blow into the lobby, which then blew the south doors off of their tracks.
    [Show full text]
  • Steamship Authority's 2019 Annual Report
    WOODS HOLE, MARTHA’S VINEYARD AND NANTUCKET STEAMSHIP AUTHORITY 2019 ANNUAL REPORT To: His Excellency, the Governor To: The Members of the General Court The 2019 Annual Report of the Woods Hole, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket Steamship Authority is respectfully submitted in accordance with Section 13 of Chapter 701 of the Acts of 1960, as amended by Chapter 276 of the Acts of 1962. Sincerely, James M. Malkin Dukes County Chairman, 2020 AUTHORITY MEMBERS – 2019 Robert R. Jones Marc N. Hanover Kathryn Wilson Moira E. Tierney Robert F. Ranney CHAIRMAN VICE CHAIRMAN SECRETARY MEMBER MEMBER BARNSTABLE DUKES COUNTY FALMOUTH NEW BEDFORD NANTUCKET (FEBRUARY – DECEMBER) Port Council Members – 2019 George J. Balco - Tisbury, Chairman Edward C. Anthes-Washburn - New Bedford, Vice Chairman Robert V. Huss - Oak Bluffs, Secretary Eric W. Shufelt - Barnstable Frank J. Rezendes - Fairhaven (January – February) Mark H. Rees - Fairhaven (March – December) Robert S. C. Munier - Falmouth Nathaniel E. Lowell - Nantucket General Manager Treasurer/Comptroller General Counsel Robert B. Davis Robert B. Davis (January – June) Terence G. Kenneally Mark K. Rozum (July – December) 2 THE STEAMSHIP AUTHORITY 2019 ANNUAL REPORT WOODS HOLE, MARTHA’S VINEYARD AND NANTUCKET STEAMSHIP AUTHORITY 2019 ANNUAL REPORT • TABLE OF CONTENTS 2019 Overview 4-21 Traffic Statistics 22-25 Independent Auditors’ Report 28-29 Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 30-43 Financial Statements as of and for the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: Statements of Net Position
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Shipwrecks of the Gulf of Mexico: a Teacher's Resource
    INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES FOR THE SIDEWHEEL STEAMSHIP JOSEPHINE The sidewheel steamship Josephine (Photo courtesy of the Mariner’s Museum, Newport News, Va.). A STEAMER FROM HAVANA GOES TO PIECES NEAR THE MISSISSIPPI COAST—NO LIVES LOST! This was the headline from a New Orleans newspaper on the morning of February 9, 1881. The steamer was the sidewheel merchant ship Josephine. She was sailing from Havana, Cuba, to New Orleans, Louisiana, when she FOUNDERED during a severe winter storm. Though all of her 65 passengers and crew survived, the shipwreck may still hold clues to the lives of people who endured this perilous journey. In 1997 the shipwreck was identified off the coast of Biloxi, Mississippi, by marine archaeologists with the Department of the Interior’s Minerals Management Service (MMS). Research conducted on this important shipwreck has also identified clues about the merchant shipping industry, and the development of IRON-HULLED steamship technology of the nineteenth century. i NOTE TO TEACHERS This Teacher’s Resource accompanies the Minerals Management Service’s (MMS) educational poster “Historic Shipwrecks of the Gulf of Mexico.” The resource is an introduction to the sidewheel steamship Josephine as an example of the types of shipwrecks found in the Gulf of Mexico. The resource is not meant to include everything about marine archaeology and we recommend that teachers use other resources to expand on this introduction. The materials presented can be adapted to levels 7-12. WHERE TO GET THE POSTER AND TEACHER’S RESOURCE Copies of the Poster and Teacher’s Resource may be obtained from the Public Information Office at the following address: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting Here from There: Steamboat Travel to Mount Desert Island
    The steamer Cimbria at So mesvi lle. Stereopticon view courtesy oft he M aine Historic Preservation Commission Getting Here from There: Steamboat Travel to Mount Desert Island David W. Granston III For the first hundred and fifty years after Mount Desert Island was permanently settled, the preferred highway was the ocean. While coasting vessels and pinky schooners reigned supreme in the eighteenth century, by the turn of the nineteen th, change was afoot. Following European advances in steam technology and the work of Robert Fulton in America, a new mode of passenger transportation was introduced to the United States, one that revolutionized access to Mount Desert Island. In May 1824, the Kennebec Steam Navigation Company unveiled Maine's first steamship at Bath. Costing $13,000, the steamer Maine was created by joining two eighty-foot schooner hulls together by means of a central paddle wheel. Leaving Bath, the Maine connected with the Patent, which ran to Boston, providing passengers with easy access to distant cities. From Bath, the Maine stopped at many coastal communities, including Boothbay Harbor, Owls Head, Camden, Belfast, Sedgwick, the Cranberry Isles, and points Down East. The Maine was soon joined by other steamers, all of which shared a similar weakness: while sailing vessels were afforded large deck space for cargo, early steamboats such as the Maine and the Patent also required space for their fuel, cordwood, which was far more abundant in Maine than coal. One early steamboat, the Bangor, which was launched in 1834 to run between Bangor and Boston, is said to have consumed twenty-five cords of wood per trip, requiring 3,200 cubic feet of space for fuel storage alone.
    [Show full text]
  • World War II Shipwrecks and Submarine Attacks in NSW Waters
    detonated against the boat’s side. The steel screw steamer weighed 287 tons and was 39.6 metres long. These incidents confirmed that Axis vessels were laying minefields around the Australian coast. German commerce raiders including WORLD WAR TWO Pinguin, Orion and Passat (ex-Storstad) laid a succession of minefields off New South Wales, SHIPWRECKS AND Tasmania, Victioria, South and Western SUBMARINE ATTACKS Australia. These are credited with also claiming the IN NSW WATERS steamers’ Cambridge and City of Rayville off 1940-1944 the Victorian coast from November 1940, and damage to the Hertford off South Australia in December. The raider Kormoran famously sank Information Sheet - Heritage Branch the cruiser HMAS Sydney off Western Australia on 19 November 1941. German raiders had been active in NSW waters during the First World War with the raider Wolf laying a minefield off Gabo Island that claimed the British freighter Cumberland in 1917. That wreck site has been located. IJN submarine I-15, namesake of the B-1 class of long range scouting submarines. I-21, I-27 and I-29 were of this 1942: Start of the Australian east type. Image courtesy: Stille, 2007. coast submarine offensive Introduction Wartime secrecy meant that the public knew During 1942, Japanese submarines I-11, I-21, I­ little of the impact on merchant vessels by 22, I-24, I-27, I-29, and I-175 conducted enemy submarines during WWII. But Japanese operations in NSW’s waters. The submarines submarines, even a German U-boat and to a accountered for nine (9) vessels sunk and four lesser extent minelayers, had significant (4) damaged.
    [Show full text]
  • Chronology of the Key Historical Events on the Eastern Seas of the Russian Arctic (The Laptev Sea, the East Siberian Sea, the Chukchi Sea)
    Chronology of the Key Historical Events on the Eastern Seas of the Russian Arctic (the Laptev Sea, the East Siberian Sea, the Chukchi Sea) Seventeenth century 1629 At the Yenisei Voivodes’ House “The Inventory of the Lena, the Great River” was compiled and it reads that “the Lena River flows into the sea with its mouth.” 1633 The armed forces of Yenisei Cossacks, headed by Postnik, Ivanov, Gubar, and M. Stadukhin, arrived at the lower reaches of the Lena River. The Tobolsk Cossack, Ivan Rebrov, was the first to reach the mouth of Lena, departing from Yakutsk. He discovered the Olenekskiy Zaliv. 1638 The first Russian march toward the Pacific Ocean from the upper reaches of the Aldan River with the departure from the Butalskiy stockade fort was headed by Ivan Yuriev Moskvitin, a Cossack from Tomsk. Ivan Rebrov discovered the Yana Bay. He Departed from the Yana River, reached the Indigirka River by sea, and built two stockade forts there. 1641 The Cossack foreman, Mikhail Stadukhin, was sent to the Kolyma River. 1642 The Krasnoyarsk Cossack, Ivan Erastov, went down the Indigirka River up to its mouth and by sea reached the mouth of the Alazeya River, being the first one at this river and the first one to deliver the information about the Chukchi. 1643 Cossacks F. Chukichev, T. Alekseev, I. Erastov, and others accomplished the sea crossing from the mouth of the Alazeya River to the Lena. M. Stadukhin and D. Yarila (Zyryan) arrived at the Kolyma River and founded the Nizhnekolymskiy stockade fort on its bank.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inman Steamship Company Limited: Innovation and Competition on the North Atlantic, 1850-1886
    The Inman Steamship Company Limited: Innovation and Competition on the North Atlantic, 1850-1886 William Henry Flayhart III De J 850 à 1886, la compagnie de navires à vapeur de Liverpool, New York et Philadelphie (Inman Line) fut l'une des entreprises maritimes les plus importantes de l'Atlantique Nord. Elle demeure à ce jour l'une des plus célèbres des grandes lignes de navires à vapeur du XIX siècle. Les principales voies desservies liaient Liverpool à Philadelphie et New York. La contribution la plus révolutionnaire de l Inman Line aux échanges de l'Atlantique Nordfut le transport régulier de passagers immigrants à bord de navires de première classe. Auparavant, les immigrants désireux de traverser l Atlantique étaientforcés de réserver leur place sur des voiliers. L Inman mit en vogue le concept du transport d'immigrants sur navires à vapeur et transforma l'industrie. In the 1860s and 1870s the Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steam Ship Company, universally known by its nickname, the "Inman Line," was one of the premier maritime enterprises on the North Atlantic. It remains one of the most famous and celebrated of all the great nineteenth century steamship lines carrying on the trade between Europe and America. While the primary routes served were from Liverpool to Philadelphia and New York, feeder services were developed from the Continent, such as the port of Antwerp, which resulted in a wider casting of the net for cargo and passengers. The origin of the Inman Line lies with William Inman of Leicester, England, who was born on 6 April 1825.1 Inman was the fourth son of Charles Inman, a partner in the freight distribution firm of Pickford and Company, and his wife, Jane Clay Inman.
    [Show full text]
  • THE Ss GREAT BRITAIN
    THE LIFE, DEATH AND RESURRECTION OF THE ss GREAT BRITAIN By Ken McNaughton This is the story of two men and a ship. Isambard Kingdom Brunel was chief engineer for the great Western Railway from London to Bristol, and designer of the Clifton Suspension Bridge and the ss Great Britain (Fig. 1). The ship had a long and productive career, was scuttled in the Falkland Islands in 1937, towed back to Bristol in 1970 and has since won a string of awards as an outstanding museum. I visited the ship in June 2008. John Ross McNaughton was a working-class Scot who left for Australia with his wife and one-year old daughter in 1838, started a dynasty in Melbourne, and returned to the United Kingdom with his wife and 14-year old son on board the ss Great Britain in 1874. He was my great great grandfather. Figure 1. The ss Great Britain, with six masts and one funnel, on 26 June 2008 in the dry dock where she was launched by Prince Albert on 19 July 1843. ISAMBARD KINGDOM BRUNEL Isambard Kingdom Brunel (Fig. 2) was born 9 April 1806 to Sophia Kingdom and Sir Marc Isambard Brunel [1]. At age 20 he was appointed chief assistant engineer of the Thames Tunnel—his father’s greatest achievement—which still runs beneath the river from Rotherhithe to Wapping. In 1830, when he was only 23, Brunel’s design was adopted for the Clifton Bridge, to span the deep gorge of the Avon River and unite Bristol in the east with the country to the west (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Continuation Sheet
    MARITIME HERITAGE OF THE UNITED STATES NHL THEME STUDIES—LARGE VESSELS NFS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. ft-86) United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property_________________________________________________ historic name SS Clipper other names/site number 2. Location street & number Navv Pier. Lake Michigan I I not for publication city, town Chicago I I vicinity state Illinois code 17 County Cook Cnnnt-y code 31 zip code 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property PH private ID building(s) Contributing Noncontributing I I public-local _] district ____ ____ buildings I I public-State site ____ ______ sites I I public-Federal "xl structure 1 ____ structures I object ____ ____ objects ____ _____ Total Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously listed in the National Register 0_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this I I nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]