The Members of the European Economic Advisory Group at Cesifo

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Members of the European Economic Advisory Group at Cesifo Authors THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ADVISORY GROUP AT CESIFO Giuseppe Bertola John Driffill (Ph.D., Massachusetts Insti­ (Ph.D., Princeton Univer­ tute of Technology, 1988) is sity, 1977) is a Professor of Professor of Economics at Economics at Birkbeck Col­- EDHEC Business School, lege, University of Lon don, on extended leave without and a Fellow of the Centre pay from his position at for Economic Policy Re­ Università di Torino where search. He has previously he has been Professore worked at the University of Associato (since 1993) and Southampton, Tilburg Uni­ Ordinario (since 1996) di Economia Politica. In 1997– ver sity, and Queen Mary and Westfield College, 2003 he was full­time Professor at the European University of London, and held visiting positions at University Institute; in 1989–93 he was Assistant Queen’s University (Kingston, Canada), in Stockholm, Professor and Assistant Director of the International Aarhus, Tokyo, and Paris. From 2004 to 2010 he was Finance Section, Princeton University. He has served as the Director of the UK Economic and Social Research a Managing Editor of Economic Policy (2001–08), Council’s programme on World Economy and Condirettore of Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Finance. From 2000 to 2004 he was on the Council Economia (1996–2011), and a Programme Director of and Executive Committee of the Royal Economic CEPR’s Labour Economics programme (2009–2013). Society. He has advised the House of Lords Select He has performed scientific advisory work for the Committee on the European Union (Sub­Committee European Commission, the European Central Bank, A: Economic and Financial Affairs) in enquiries into and other organizations. His research currently focuses the euro and the Stability and Growth Pact. Most of on the structural and institutional aspects of labour and his research has been on macroeconomics and mone­ financial markets, from an international comparative tary policy, and he has published in many scholarly perspective, particularly as regards their distributional journals, including the American Economic Review, impact and interaction with the European process of the Review of Economic Studies, the Journal of economic and monetary unification. He has applied sim­ Monetary Economics, and the European Economic ilar methods to exchange rate and money­market poli­ Review. He has published two edited volumes, one on cies, interactions between growth and distribution, A Currency for Europe, another on The Role of households’ durable consumption and borrowing, and Financial Markets in the Transition Process, and an in­ educational systems. He has also published widely in the troductory textbook, Economics with Joseph E. Review of Economic Studies, the American Economic Stiglitz (W. W. Norton and Co, 2000). Review, the European Economic Review, other academic journals and books, also authoring chapters in Handbook John Driffill of Labor Economics and Handbook of Income Birkbeck College Distribution (North­Holland), co­authoring Models for Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom Dynamic Macroeconomics (Oxford University Press) [email protected] and Income Distribution in Macroeconomic Models (Princeton University Press), and co­editing Welfare and Employment in a United Europe and The Economics of Consumer Credit (MIT Press). Giuseppe Bertola EDHEC Business School 393 promenade des Anglais, BP 3116, 06200 Nice Cedex 3, France [email protected] 99 EEAG Report 2015 Authors Harold James Hans-Werner Sinn (Ph.D. Cambridge Universi­ is Professor of Economics ty, 1982) is Claude and Lore and Public Finance at the Kelly Professor in European Uni versity of Munich Studies and a Professor of (LMU) and President of the History at Princeton Uni­ CESifo Group. He has been versity, a Professor of Inter­ a member of the Council of national Affairs in the Economic Advisors to the Woodrow Wilson School, as German Ministry of Eco­ well as an Adjunct Professor nomics since 1989 and is a at BI Norwegian Business School. He is Director of the fellow of a number of learned societies. From 1997–2000 Program in Contemporary European Politics and he was President of the German Economic Association Society and serves on the editorial committee of the (Verein für Socialpolitik) and from 2006–2009 of the journal World Politics and is Chairman of the Academic International Institute of Public Finance. He holds hon­ Council of The European Association for Banking and orary doctorates from the Universities of Magdeburg Financial History (EABH). Before coming to the (1999) and Helsinki (2011), as well as the HHL Leipzig United States in 1986, he was a Fellow of Peterhouse for (2013), and an honorary professorship from the eight years. He was awarded with the Ellen MacArthur University of Vienna. He has taught at the University of Prize for Economic History at the University of Western Ontario, and held visiting fellowships at the Cambridge in 1982, the Helmut Schmidt Prize in London School of Economics, as well as at Bergen, Economic History at the German Historical Institute in Hebrew, Oslo, Princeton and Stanford Universities. He Washington, D.C. in 2004 and the Ludwig Erhard Prize received awards from the University of Mannheim for for writing about economics in 2005. His research fo­ his dissertation and habilitation theses, and a number of cuses on European economic history, and German his­ other prizes and awards from various institutions includ­ tory in particular. He has published and co­authored ing the Corine Award (2004) for his bestseller Ist several books analysing Germany’s financial history in Deutschland noch zu retten? (Can Germany be Saved?), the interwar era, the changing character of national the Ludwig­Erhard­Prize for Economic Journalism identity in Germany and detailed studies about the (2013), and the Gustav­Schmoller­Medal (2014). He fea­ Deutsche Bundesbank. His latest book, Making the tures in the worldwide list of the Top 100 Thought European Monetary Union published by the Harvard Leaders for his work on the bazaar economy. He was University Press in 2012, deals with the role of the awarded the Officer’s Cross of the Order of Merit of the Committee of Central Bank Governors and the origins Federal Republic of Germany in 2005 and the Bavarian of the European Central Bank, giving us a deeper un­ Maximilian Order in 2008. In 1999 he gave the Yrjö derstanding of the European monetary crisis by tracing Jahnsson Lectures, in 2000 the Stevenson Lectures, in the decade­long process of implementing the idea of a 2004 the Tinbergen Lectures, in 2005 the World Economy Europe­wide monetary union and common currency, Annual Lecture, in 2007 the Thünen Lecture, in 2010 the which finally morphed into the European Central Bank. D.B. Doran Lecture, in 2011 the European Economy Lecture, in 2012 the Van Lanschot and the Egon Sohmen Harold James Lectures, and in 2013 the Whitman, the Julian Hodge Princeton University and the Booth Lectures. Sinn has published in the History Department American Economic Review, the Quarterly Journal of 129 Dickinson Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544­1017, USA Economics, the European Economic Review, the Journal [email protected] of Public Economics and many other journals. He has published 11 major and 17 smaller monographs in six languages including Economic Decisions under Uncer­ tainty, Capital Income Taxation and Resource Allocation, Jumpstart – The Economic Unification of Germany, The New Systems Competition, Casino Capitalism, The Green Paradox, and The Euro Trap. Hans­Werner Sinn Ifo Institute Poschingerstr. 5, 81679 Munich, Germany [email protected] EEAG Report 2015 100 Authors Jan-Egbert Sturm Ákos Valentinyi (Ph.D. University of Gro­ (Ph.D. European Univer­ ningen, 1997) is Professor of sity Institute, 1997) is a Applied Macroeconomics, Professor of Economics at Director of the KOF Swiss Cardiff Business School, a Economic Institute at the Fellow of CEPR and a ETH Zurich, President of Senior Research Fellow at the Centre for International the Institute of Economics Research on Economic Ten­ of the Hungarian Academy dency Surveys (CIRET) and of Sciences. He was previ­ Editor of the European Journal of Political Economy. He ously Professor at the University of Southampton and was a researcher at the University of Groningen, The Head of Research at the National Bank of Hungary. Netherlands, until 2001, and taught as Visiting Professor He has also been a Visiting Professor at the Central at the School of Business, Bond University, Gold Coast, European University in Budapest and Universidad Australia, in 2000 and 2005. As Head of the Department Carlos III in Madrid. His research focuses on macro­ for Economic Forecasting and Financial Markets at the economics, economic growth, productivity differences Ifo Institute for Economic Research, he was also and structural change. He has published in leading in­ Professor of Economics at the University of Munich ternational journals including the American Economic (LMU) at the Center for Economic Studies (CES), Review, Review of Economic Studies, the Review of 2001–2003. He held the Chair of Monetary Economics Economic Dynamics, and the Journal of the European in Open Economies at the University of Konstanz, Economic Association. Germany, which was coupled with the position of Director of the Thurgau Institute of Economics (TWI) Ákos Valentinyi in Kreuzlingen, Switzerland, 2003–2005. In his research, Cardiff Business School Jan­Egbert Sturm relies heavily on empirical methods Aberconway Building and statistics, concentrating on monetary economics, Colum Drive, Cardiff CF10 3EU, United Kingdom macroeconomics as well as political economy. His ap­ [email protected] plied studies have focused on, for example, economic growth and central bank policy. He has published sev­ eral books, contributed articles to various anthologies and international journals including the American Economic Review, the European Economic Review, the European Journal of Political Economy, the Journal of Banking and Finance, the Journal of Development Economics, the Oxford Economic Papers, Public Choice, and the Scandinavian Journal of Economics.
Recommended publications
  • Whose Brain Drain? Immigrant Scholars and American Views of Germany
    Harry & Helen Gray Humanities Program Series Volume 9 WHOSE BRAIN DRAI N? IMMIGRANT SCHOLARS AND AMERICAN VIEWS OF GERMANY Edited by Peter Uwe Hohendahl Cornell University American Institute for Contemporary German Studies The Johns Hopkins University Harry & Helen Gray Humanities Program Series Volume 9 WHOSE BRAIN DRAIN? IMMIGRANT SCHOLARS AND AMERICAN VIEWS OF GERMANY Edited by Peter Uwe Hohendahl Cornell University The American Institute for Contemporary German Studies (AICGS) is a center for advanced research, study and discussion on the politics, culture and society of the Federal Republic of Germany. Established in 1983 and affiliated with The Johns Hopkins University but governed by its own Board of Trustees, AICGS is a privately incorporated institute dedicated to independent, critical and comprehensive analysis and assessment of current German issues. Its goals are to help develop a new generation of American scholars with a thorough understanding of contemporary Germany, deepen American knowledge and understanding of current German developments, contribute to American policy analysis of problems relating to Germany, and promote interdisciplinary and comparative research on Germany. Executive Director: Jackson Janes Board of Trustees, Cochair: Fred H. Langhammer Board of Trustees, Cochair: Dr. Eugene A. Sekulow The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) alone. They do not necessarily reflect the views of the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies. ©2001 by the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies ISBN 0-941441-55-5 This Humanities Program Volume is made possible by the Harry & Helen Gray Humanities Program. Additional copies are available for $5.00 to cover postage and handling from the American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Suite 420, 1400 16th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Beijing's Bismarckian Ghosts: How Great Powers Compete Economically
    Markus Brunnermeier and Rush Doshi and Harold James Beijing’s Bismarckian Ghosts: How Great Powers Compete Economically Great power competition is back. As China and the United States ramp up their strategic rivalry, the search is on for a vision of what their evolving great power competition will look like in a globalized and interconnected world. The looming trade war and ongoing technology competition between Washington and Beijing suggest that economics may now be the central battlefield in the bilat- eral contest. Much of the abundant literature on great power competition and grand strategy focuses on military affairs, and little of it prepares us for what eco- nomic and technological competition among great powers looks like, let alone how it will be waged.1 But great power economic competition is nothing new. Indeed, the rivalry between China and the United States in the twenty-first century holds an uncanny resemblance to the one between Germany and Great Britain in the nine- teenth. Both rivalries take place amidst the emergence of economic globalization and explosive technological innovation. Both feature a rising autocracy with a state-protected economic system challenging an established democracy with a free-market economic system. And both rivalries feature countries enmeshed in profound interdependence wielding tariff threats, standard-setting, technology theft, financial power, and infrastructure investment for advantage. Indeed, for these very reasons, the Anglo-German duel can serve as a useful guide for policy- makers seeking to understand the dynamics of the emerging Sino-American Markus Brunnermeier is the Edwards S. Sanford Professor of Economics at Princeton University, and can be found on Twitter (@MarkusEconomist).
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons from the Weimar Constitution
    Markets and Constitutions: Lessons from Weimar Germany Harold James EUI and Princeton University Paper for EUI conference on “Constitutions and Markets”, June 14-15, 2007 This is a paper about failure. Bad constitutions will lead not only to political malaise but also to market collapses. In turn big economic catastrophes destroy polities and tear constitutions apart. What do I mean by bad? When a constitution departs from general and universally applicable principles, and starts to announce partial and limited laws, exemptions or privileges, that are intended to distort economic and social relations, it carries the seed of its own demise. The Weimar Republic was and also continues to be the testing place of social and legal theories: not only of constitutional design, but also of a concept of legally enforceable social rights, as well as of the question of whether a “third way” was possible between market capitalism and the planned economy. Weimar was a pioneering experiment. The makers of the constitution included Germany’s most distinguished social scientists, Max Weber and Hugo Preuss. They set out to make a framework that went well beyond traditional constitutional theory, and which included a blueprint for a better society. It was intended to be the world’s best constitution, and some of the jurists who worked with it, including makers of the Israeli constitution, held onto the conviction of its role as a universal model. But by that time, after the tragedies of the Nazi dictatorship and the Second World War, the debate about Weimar and its legacy had produced a contrasting and possibly even more influential interpretation: that Weimar was and is a model of what a constitution should not try to do.
    [Show full text]
  • Explaining Germany's Exceptional Recovery
    May 2018 What explains Germany’s exceptional recovery from the ‘sick man of Exceptional Recovery Explaining Germany’s Europe’ in the 1990s to the powerhouse of today? Explaining Germany’s Based on research of leading economists and political scientist in Europe and the US, this eBook explores the conditions leading to Germany’s rise. The book finds that the opening up of Eastern Europe after the Exceptional Recovery fall communism led to profound changes in how firms and workers operated. In particular, the book argues that trade liberalisation with Eastern Europe led to decentralised wage bargaining; to a decentralised, less hierarchical management style in firms; and to the expansion of production networks to Eastern Europe. These changes in the labour Edited by Dalia Marin market institutions and in firms’ business models explain Germany’s exceptional export performance. They also explain why Germany absorbed the China shock more easily than other countries and why globalisation did not contribute to the rise in voting for the far right in Germany. ISBN 978-1-912179-13-8 Centre for Economic Policy Research A VoxEU.org Book 33 Great Sutton Street London EC1V 0DX CEPR Press Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 CEPR Press Email: [email protected] www.cepr.org 9 781912 179138 Explaining Germany’s Exceptional Recovery CEPR Press Centre for Economic Policy Research 33 Great Sutton Street London, EC1V 0DX UK Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801 Email: [email protected] Web: www.cepr.org ISBN: 978-1-912179-13-8 Copyright © CEPR Press, 2018. Explaining Germany’s Exceptional Recovery Edited by Dalia Marin A VoxEU.org eBook CEPR Press Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) The Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR) is a network of over 1,000 research economists based mostly in European universities.
    [Show full text]
  • SUERF Policy Note, Issue No 178 (0.44
    SUERF Policy Note Issue No 178, June 2020 Covalization: Europe on the Rack Between Globalization and Covid A Historian’s Perspective on the European Union: Europe and Globalization By Harold James Princeton University JEL-codes: F02, F45, N14, N24, N44. Keywords: European integration, monetary union, globalization, federalism. The European Union is often thought of as a Globalization has often been strained. We can manifestation of the phenomenon of globalization trace this history of questioning globalization in (understood as the mobility of capital, goods, phases: people, but also as a demonstration of the limits of the nation-state). Populist critics often simply • In the 1930s, there was a complete collapse lump the European Union and globalization of globalization with the Great Depression together as eroders of national sovereignty; while (what I termed “The End of Globalization” in defenders of the integration project emphasize the a 2001 book).1 way in which the EU can harness or tame globalization, and Europe’s population from its • In the 1970s, oil price shocks, the perception wildest and most dangerous excesses. At a that the geography of power in the world moment when the corona virus is thrusting was shifting, and inflationary pressures led globalization into reverse, the EU might be to a discussion of a New International particularly vulnerable. Economic Order. 1 Harold James, The End of Globalization: Lessons from the Great Depression, Cambridge Mass.: Harvard University Press, 2001. www.suerf.org/policynotes SUERF Policy Note No 178 1 Covalization: Europe on the Rack Between Globalization and Covid • In the 1990s, in the wake of the collapse of constitution of a European union, exposed as they are communism in central Europe, and with very to the temptation of measuring themselves on the large capital flows threatening financial and scale of their own past rather than on that economic stability, the question of global constituted by the realities of the present and governance in a post-Cold War world gave rise predictions of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Monetary and Financial Reform in Two Eras of Globalization
    This PDF is a selection from a published volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: Globalization in Historical Perspective Volume Author/Editor: Michael D. Bordo, Alan M. Taylor and Jeffrey G. Williamson, editors Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-06598-7 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/bord03-1 Conference Date: May 3-6, 2001 Publication Date: January 2003 Title: Monetary and Financial Reform in Two Eras of Globalization Author: Barry Eichengreen, Harold James URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c9597 11 Monetary and Financial Reform in Two Eras of Globalization Barry Eichengreen and Harold James This paper reviews the history of successes and failures in international monetary and financial reform in two eras of globalization, the late nine- teenth century and the late twentieth century, and in the period in between. That history is rich, varied, and difficult to summarize compactly. We there- fore organize our narrative around a specific hypothesis. That hypothesis is that a consensus on the need for monetary and finan- cial reform is likely to develop when such reform is seen as essential for the defense of the global trading system. Typically the international monetary and financial system evolves in a gradual and decentralized manner in re- sponse to market forces. The shift toward greater exchange rate flexibility and capital account convertibility since 1973 is the most recent and there- fore obvious illustration of what is a more general point. Large-scale and discontinuous reform at a more centralized level—that is, reforms agreed to and implemented by groups of governments—tend to occur only when problems in the monetary and financial system are seen as placing the global trading system at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • 14469-9781462367689.Pdf
    STAFF PAPERS PETER HOLE Chair, Editorial Committee lAN S. McDoNALD Editor and Deputy Chair MARINA PRIMORAC Assistant Editor Editorial Committee F. Charles Adams Malcolm D. Knight Mario I. Blejer Pau 1 R. Masson David Burton Donald J. Mathieson Daniel A. Citrin Susan M. Schadler David J. Goldsbrough Subhash M. Thakur Peter Isard Howell H. Zee G. Russell Kincaid Among the responsibilities of the International Monetary Fund, as set fonh in its Anicles of Agreement, is the obligation to "act as a centre for the collection and exchange of information on monetary and financial problems." Staff Papers makes available to a wider audience papers prepared by the members of the Fund staff. The views presented in the papers are those of the authors and are not to be interpreted as necessarily indicating the position of the Executive Board or of the Fund. To facilitate electronic storage and retrieval of bibliographic data. StaffPapers has adopted the subject classification scheme developed by the Journal of Economic Literature. Subscription: US$54.00a volume or the approximate equivalent in the currencies of most countries. Four numbers constitute a volume. Single copies may be purchased at $18.00. Individual academic rate to full-time professors and students of universities and colleges: $27 a volume. Subscriptions and orders should be sent to: International Monetary Fund Publication Services 700 19th Street. N.W. Washington, D.C. 20431, U.S.A. Telephone: (202) 623-7430 Telefax: (202) 623-7201 Internet: [email protected] ©International Monetary Fund. Not for Redistribution INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND STAFF PAPERS Vol. 42 No. 4 DECEMBER 1995 ©International Monetary Fund.
    [Show full text]
  • "Northern" EU Enlargement: 47Th Economics Conference 2020 of the Oenb in Cooperation with SUERF
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Ed.) Proceedings 25 years of "Northern" EU enlargement: 47th Economics Conference 2020 of the OeNB in cooperation with SUERF SUERF Conference Proceedings, No. 2020/2 Provided in Cooperation with: SUERF – The European Money and Finance Forum, Vienna Suggested Citation: Oesterreichische Nationalbank (Ed.) (2020) : 25 years of "Northern" EU enlargement: 47th Economics Conference 2020 of the OeNB in cooperation with SUERF, SUERF Conference Proceedings, No. 2020/2, SUERF - The European Money and Finance Forum, Vienna This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/234534 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available
    [Show full text]
  • Deglobalization As a Global Challenge
    CIGI Papers No. 135 — June 2017 Deglobalization as a Global Challenge Harold James CIGI Papers No. 135 — June 2017 Deglobalization as a Global Challenge Harold James CIGI Masthead Executive President Rohinton P. Medhora Director of Finance Shelley Boettger Director of the International Law Research Program Oonagh Fitzgerald Director of the Global Security & Politics Program Fen Osler Hampson Director of Human Resources Susan Hirst Director of the Global Economy Program Domenico Lombardi Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel Aaron Shull Director of Communications and Digital Media Spencer Tripp Publications Publisher Carol Bonnett Senior Publications Editor Jennifer Goyder Publications Editor Patricia Holmes Publications Editor Nicole Langlois Publications Editor Sharon McCartney Publications Editor Lynn Schellenberg Graphic Designer Melodie Wakefield For publications enquiries, please contact [email protected]. Communications For media enquiries, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2017 by the Centre for International Governance Innovation The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre for International Governance Innovation or its Board of Directors. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution — Non-commercial — No Derivatives License. To view this license, visit (www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). For re-use or distribution, please include this copyright notice. Printed in Canada on paper containing
    [Show full text]
  • Beijing's Bismarckian Ghosts: How Great Powers Compete Economically
    Beijing’s Bismarckian Ghosts: How Great Powers Compete Economically Markus Brunnermeier, Professor of Economics, Princeton University Rush Doshi, Brookings-Yale Postdoctoral Research Fellow Harold James, Professor of History and International Affairs, Princeton University Forthcoming: The Washington Quarterly, Fall 2018, pp. 161-176 Abstract: The economic and technological rivalry between China and the United States in the twenty-first century holds an uncanny resemblance to that between Bismarck’s Imperial Germany and a preeminent Great Britain in the nineteenth and early twentieth. Both rivalries feature competing states enmeshed in profound interdependence at a time of explosive technological innovation. Both feature an established democracy with a free-market system feeling cheated by a rising autocracy with a state-protected economic system, and choosing to lash out with counterproductive unilateral tariffs. Finally, both rivalries reveal that such competition is about much more than tariffs: it is also about sophisticated instruments like standard-setting, technology acquisition and theft, financial power, and infrastructure investment. We argue that, like Great Britain a century ago, the United States is ignoring these more sophisticated instruments of competition with its narrow focus on ineffective blunt force tariffs that alienate allies (as the recent G-7 breakdown suggests) without weakening adversaries. As the Anglo-German rivalry demonstrates, a truly competitive American approach requires a fuller range of instruments combined with robust efforts to harness network power in economic and technological domains, especially through multilateralism. Unfortunately, Washington’s limited and unilateral approach risks being confrontational without being competitive. 1 Introduction Great power competition is back. As China and the United States ramp up their strategic rivalry, the search is on for a vision of what their evolving great power competition will look like in a globalized and interconnected world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Members of the European Economic Advisory Group
    AUTHORS THE MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ADVISORY GROUP Torben M. Andersen Giuseppe Bertola (Ph.D., CORE, Université Catholique, (Ph.D., Massachusetts Institute of Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium, 1986) is Technology, 1988) is Professor of Professor of Economics at Aarhus Political Economy at the University University, Denmark and a Fellow of of Turin (Associato since 1993 and CESifo, Centre for Economic Policy Ordinario since 1996). He was on Research and IZA. He has served as leave in 2011–15 as Professor of department head and member of Economics at EDHEC Business various university committees. He has had various School and in 1997–2003 as full-time Professor at the short-term visiting positions at other universities, European University Institute. In 1989–93 he was served as editor of the Scandinavian Journal of Assistant Professor and Assistant Director of the Economics (1991–1997), and as member of several edi- International Finance Section, Princeton University. He torial boards. He has been extensively involved in policy has served as a Managing Editor of Economic Policy advice in Denmark and abroad. In Denmark among oth- (2001–2008), Condirettore of Giornale degli Economisti e er as chairman of the Economic Council (1993–1996 and Annali di Economia (1996–2011), and a Programme 2001–2003), the Welfare Commission (2003–2006), and Director of CEPR’s Labour Economics programme the Pension Commission (2014–2015) and as member of (2009–2013). He has performed scientific advisory work the Systemic Risk Council (since 2013). Abroad his advi- for the European Commission, the European Central sory activities include the EU Commission, member of Bank, and other organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the History of East Germany Through the Literature of Christa Wolf
    NACHDENKEN ÜBER OSTDEUTSCHLAND: UNDERSTANDING THE HISTORY OF EAST GERMANY THROUGH THE LITERATURE OF CHRISTA WOLF Kristen Oviatt A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS August 2013 Committee: Kristie Foell, Co-Advisor Beth Ann Griech-Polelle, Co-Advisor Christina Guenther Douglas Forsyth © 2013 Kristen Oviatt All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Kristie Foell and Beth Ann Griechn Polelle, Advisors The Purpose of this thesis is to contextualizeCo- Christa Wolf’s works Der geteilte Himmel, Nachdenken über Christa T., Medea, and Stadt der Engel oder The Overcoat of Dr. Freud in their historical setting, and to discuss their contemporary impact on society. Wolf’s writings follow a pattern of her own influence within East German society and history, as she first acts on history, with Der geteilte Himmel, then becomes acted upon in Nachdenken über Christa T., and finally, she reflects on her personal history through Medea and Stadt der Engel. Contrasting these specific works with other novels and diaries of hers provides background information essential to those four novels. Then, placing these works in their greater historical context shows Wolf’s impact on the society around her. Wolf consistently provides a dual analysis of events through use of flashback and memory in her texts, giving the reader a unique frame of reference in reflecting on the works. Expanding on one of Wolf’s own terms, I call this literary use of multiple time frames and memories dual subjective authenticity. This literary device is significant in Wolf’s writings because through these dual perspectives, Wolf is able to address problems in East German society, while still showing support for the GDR government.
    [Show full text]