DOCSLIB.ORG

(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,579,227 B2 Haughey (45) Date of Patent: Jun

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,579,227 B2 Haughey (45) Date of Patent: Jun USOO6579227B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,579,227 B2 Haughey (45) Date of Patent: Jun. 17, 2003 (54) FORESKIN RESTORATION DEVICE 2,533,373 A * 12/1950 Hinckley et al. ........... 606/118 2,620,800 A 12/1952 Powers ....................... 606/118 (76) Inventor: James A. Haughey, 2421 Clark Ave., 2,646,046 A * 7/1953 Maryan ...................... 606/118 Venice, CA (US) 90291 3.802,439 A * 4/1974 Baumgarten ................ 606/118 s 3,874.389 A * 4/1975 Baumgarten ................. 25/514 ( c: ) Notice: Subject tO any disclaimer, the term of this D375,358 S 11/1996 Clark ........................ D24/133 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 * cited by examiner U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. Primary Examiner Samuel G. Gilbert (21) Appl. No.: 09/844,956 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Apr. 26, 2001 This device grips the skin of the penile shaft firmly, yet (65) Prior Publication Data atraumatically, So that, as tension is applied to the device, new skin cells are Stimulated to grow, gradually creating a US 2001/0049468 A1 Dec. 6, 2001 new foreskin. The gripping device itself consists of two O O Separate, unconnected, generally tapered gripping members. Related U.S. Application Data The larger end of the Smaller, inner, member 11 is placed (60) Provisional application No. 60/200,119, filed on Apr. 27, upon the glans penis 13, FIG. 4A. A double layer of skin 14, 2000. 15 is pulled up from the penile shaft and laid against this (51) Int. Cl." ................................................... A61F 5/00 inner member, FIG. 4B. The outer gripping member 12 is (52) U.S. Cl. ......................................................... 600/38 then placed Snugly but gently over this skin, FIG. 4C. (58) Field of Search ....................... 600/3841; 606/118. Through a novel mechanism, which utilizes the unique gliding and everting function of the foreskin, as increasing (56) References Cited tension is applied to the Strut 16 attached to the inner member FIG. 4D, the two gripping members are drawn more U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS tightly together, thus increasing the gripping preSSure, FIGS. 2,238,660 A 4/1941 Santora ...................... 606/118 3A, 3B. 2,345,639 A * 4/1944 Tibone et al...... ... 606/118 2,355.209 A * 8/1944 Dwoyer ...................... 606/118 19 Claims, 8 Drawing Sheets U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 1 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 2 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 3 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 4 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 5 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 FIG 7A FIG.7B U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 6 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 FIG. 9A U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 7 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 U.S. Patent Jun. 17, 2003 Sheet 8 of 8 US 6,579,227 B2 21 O FGOA FG.OB FIG.IOC FG. US 6,579.227 B2 1 2 FORESKIN RESTORATION DEVICE The United States is the only industrialized nation which routinely circumcises male infants for non-religious reasons. CROSS REFERENCES TO RELATED The widespread American practice of routine infant male APPLICATIONS circumcision began between 1880 and 1920. In the wide Spread anti-SeX atmosphere of that period, circumcision This application is entitled to the benefit of Provisional advocates pushed infant circumcision, claiming that it would Patent Application Serial # 60/200,119, filed Apr. 27, 2000. prevent boys from masturbating, and further claiming to believe that by preventing masturbation, then one would BACKGROUND also prevent many cases of brain tumors, epilepsy, diarrhea, 1. Field of Invention etc. Although circumcision didn't Stop masturbation, it did leave many males with a lifetime of impaired Sexual enjoy This invention relates generally to gripping or clamping ment for both them and their partners. These are some of the devices, and more particularly to devices which grip or reasons that Some men have decided to restore their fore clamp the skin. It also relates generally to Stretching devices, skins. and more particularly to devices which Stretch the Skin. It The methods of foreskin restoration presently available also relates to devices which promote expansion of skin 15 are quite limited. One method has been the creation of a new through new skin growth. foreskin through Surgical techniques. Donor skin is usually 2. Description of Prior Art taken from the Scrotum and attached to the penis So as to Although the idea of restoring foreskin may seem bizarre form a Somewhat natural-appearing foreskin. This method to Some, there are many good reasons for doing SO. Human has many disadvantages, which have caused it to fall into beings show remarkable hubris in blithely cutting off some disfavor. Its use is discouraged by groups of men interested thing which it took mother nature millions of years to in restoration because of the following disadvantages. It is design. Some of the reasons for the existence of foreskin can quite expensive, costing Several thousand dollars. It has all be seen by comparing intact men with circumcised men. The the risks associated with Surgery, including Scarring, foreskin of intact males produces pheromones-Sexual infection, hemorrhage, and risk of reactions to anesthesia. 25 The transplanted skin does not have the characteristics of Stimulants-which have been proven to increase the man's normal foreskin: It is wrinkled rather than Smooth, has hair attractiveness to others. Removing the foreskin also removes growing where it doesn’t belong, and, being deprived of its natural gliding, “lubricating function. Of Women who nerves, it lackS Sensation. After Surgery, there is a period of expressed a preference, 90% favored sex with intact, rather recovery during which the man cannot engage in SeX. But than circumcised, men. Women are 40% more likely to have the greatest disadvantage is that the Surgically restored multiple orgasms with intact men. Not only his partners, but foreskin does not have the normal gliding action of the the male victim of circumcision himself also has greatly natural foreskin. reduced Sexual pleasure as the result of losing his foreskin. Organizations of men interested in foreskin restoration are Besides losing millions of Sensory nerve endings in the cut unanimous in their recommendation that restoration be off skin, his unprotected glans is converted from a moist, achieved through the application of tension to the skin of the glassy Smooth, highly Sensitive mucoid Surface into a rough, 35 penile shaft. Tension on Skin does not merely Stretch the dry, cornified Structure with greatly reduced Sensitivity. skin, but, more importantly, it actually induces growth of Although routine infant male circumcision is still new skin tissue. commonplace, its frequency is declining. This trend has Foreskin restoration through tension avoids the disadvan been hastened, in part, by positions taken recently by two tages of Surgery and produces a foreskin which is nearly prestigious medical bodies in the United States. Although it 40 normal in both appearance and function. But, as generally had been claimed in the past that circumcision prevents employed, restoration through tension is very time many deaths from penile cancer, this research has been consuming, generally taking Several years to complete. It found flawed, and the American Cancer Society website also has many other disadvantages, to be described below. currently has the following Statement: “The consensus 45 The most commonly employed method of restoration among Studies that have taken these other factors into through tension involves applying tape to the skin of the account is that circumcision is not of value in preventing shaft and pulling on it-Via either an elastic band or by Small cancer of the penis. It is important that the issue of circum weights hung from the tape. Since this method involves tape cision not distract the public's attention from avoiding left on the penis for days at a time, it causes problems with known penile cancer risk factors.” Also, "AS representatives 50 Spontaneous SeX or showers in public places. Also, Since of the American Cancer Society, we would like to discour StreSS is concentrated along the edge of the tape, Skin tears age the American Academy of Pediatrics from promoting are common. Furthermore, repeatedly applying and remov routine circumcision as preventative measure for penile or ing the tape is very irritating to the skin. The most commonly cervical cancer.” used tape configuration, called T-tape, requires that one get In 1998, the American Academy of Pediatrics issued a 55 an erection before applying the tape. Needless to Say, this new policy Statement which States, ". data are not greatly increases the inconvenience and time required for Sufficient to recommend routine neonatal circumcision. In applying the tape. circumstances in which there are potential benefits and risks, In a Search for foreskin restoration patents, the only patent yet the procedure is not essential to the child's current found was U.S. Pat. No. 5,344,396, “Device for stretching well-being, parents should determine what is in the best 60 the foreskin of the penis.” This device has many disadvan interest of the child. tages compared to this current application because: At present, there is no medical organization anywhere in 1. It uses adhesive tape to Secure the foreskin to the the World which recommends routine male circumcision. device, with all the above-mentioned problems with Although female circumcision has long been viewed with tape. alarm as being a form of genital mutilation, the correspond 65 2. The device is essentially a large, cumberSome metal ing male genital mutilation of circumcision is often consid weight which would Swing around while one walked, ered inconsequential, or even desirable.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IS CIRCUMCISION a FRAUD? FRAUD? a IS CIRCUMCISION Peter W
    cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No. 27 Side A 11/12/2020 09:05:36 \\jciprod01\productn\C\CJP\30-1\CJP102.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-NOV-20 14:50 IS CIRCUMCISION A FRAUD? Peter W. Adler, Robert Van Howe, Travis Wisdom & Felix Daase* This Article suggests that non-therapeutic male circumcision or male genital cutting (MGC), the irreversible removal of the foreskin from the penises of healthy boys, is not only unlawful in the United States but also fraudulent. As a German court held in 2012 before its ruling was effectively overturned by a special statute under political pressure, cir- cumcision for religious or non-medical reasons is harmful, violates the child’s rights to bodily integrity and self-determination (which super- sedes competing parental rights), and constitutes criminal assault. MGC also violates the child’s rights under U.S. law, and it constitutes a bat- tery, a tort and a crime, and statutory child abuse. Building upon a 2016 case in the United Kingdom, we make the novel suggestion that when performed by a physician, MGC is a breach of trust or fiduciary duty, and hence constructive fraud, where courts impute fraud even if intent to defraud is absent. We reprise and build upon the argument that it is unlawful and Medicaid fraud for physicians and hospitals to bill Medi- caid for unnecessary genital surgery. Finally, we suggest that MGC con- stitutes intentional fraud by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and most physicians who perform circumcisions in the United States. They have long portrayed MGC as medicine when it is violence, and as a parental right when males have the right to keep their penile foreskin, and physicians are not allowed to take orders from parents to perform cjp_30-1_42664 Sheet No.
    [Show full text]
  • “I'm Not Missing Anything by Being Circumcised; Why Should I Restore
    “I’m not missing anything by being Pleasure. The foreskin is a unique structure filled with which they had always believed was irreversible. circumcised; why should I restore?” delicate nerves and a rich blood supply. The foreskin enhances sexual pleasure, especially as it glides over the Resentment. A 1991 survey of 301 males seeking corona (ridge of the glans) during sexual activity. restoration information showed that almost 70% of those With no accurate means of comparison, the typical circumcised as infants or children resent their parents for circumcised man does not know what he is missing. A Sensitivity. The foreskin is a highly nerve-laden structure, their circumcision. Regaining power over their bodies man, colorblind from birth and thinking his sight is containing approximately 10,000 nerve endings. It is this reduces resentment. normal, might also never question his condition. structure that gives the man his most pleasurable However, as a man ages, he loses sensitivity of the penis. sensations. It also helps to retain glans sensitivity. Empowerment. Victims of rape, crime and child or Many men have difficulty achieving sufficient Circumcision removed this structure and over time spousal abuse typically report a deep sense of stimulation to reach orgasm. The foreskin is a definite sensitivity decreases, making it more difficult to achieve helplessness and vulnerability. Who is more helpless and asset in maintaining this sensitivity. satisfactory stimulation. vulnerable than a restrained newborn having part of his penis amputated? Men restore to take back control of Foreskin restoration is a logical process of returning the Lubrication. Much as the way your eyelid lubricates and their bodies from the damage done by parents, their penis to as close to its original condition as possible.
    [Show full text]
  • Owners Manual
    Penisownersinstructionmanual INTRODUCTION Welcome to the world-wide family of penis owners. We trust that you will enjoy many years of trouble-free service from yours. To help ensure that you will, we encourage you to familiarise yourself with the following equipment descriptions, operating instructions and maintenance requirements. BODY AND INTERIOR SPECIFICATIONS (all model years) PENIS Average length and diameter (flaccid) 3.5 x 1.25 inches Average length and diameter (erect) 5.1 x 1.6 inches Average percent increase in volume, flaccid to erect 300% (wow!) Longest medically recorded erection 12 inches Amount of blood in erect penis 8 to 10 x normal Average erections per night (while sleeping) 5 Average duration of each nocturnal erection 20 to 30 minutes Estimated replacement value (good condition model) £50,000 CAUTION! The following can shrink a relaxed penis by two inches or more:- Cold weather, chilly baths or showers, sexual activity, exhaustion, excitement (non sexual), illness and Richard Branson. TESTICLES Average length and width 1.4 x 1 inch Average weight 0.875 x 1.75 ounces Temperature 94.6 degrees Fahrenheit Compartments within each 400 SPERM Average body's production 50,000 per minute/72 million per day (and remember lads, it only takes 1!) Days to maturity 84 Number in ejaculate of average fertile 200 to 600 million man Number of ejaculate of infertile man less than 50 million Percentage of total ejaculate 3% Average swimming speed 1 to 4 millimetres per minute Average life span once mature 1 month in you, 1 to 2 days in woman, 2 minutes on sheets CAUTION! The testicles need to be slightly cooler than normal body temperature for optimum sperm production.
    [Show full text]
  • European Urology Today Official Newsletter of the European Association of Urology Vol
    European Urology Today Official newsletter of the European Association of Urology Vol. 25 No.6/Vol. 26 No.1 - Dec. 2013/Jan. 2014 What to expect in Stockholm 9th SEEM in Greece From max to mini Get a preview of what’s on during the From ‘country debates’ to research awards, Needlescopic surgery is back and the interest is 4/5 EAU Congress in Stockholm 14 the SEEM takes a new turn 30 growing Urologists, medical and radiation oncologists come together 5th EMUC in Marseille gathers delegates from 61 countries By Loek Keizer Over the course of three days, three separate but intrinsically linked disciplines attended a scientific meeting and exchanged views on the treatment of radiotherapists approach tumours with probabilities urological cancers. The 5th edition of the European and sigmoid curves. I’m convinced that by learning Multidisciplinary Meeting on Urological Cancers each other’s language and working together in (EMUC) was organised by the EAU, the European multidisciplinary teams is the future for the treatment Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) and the European of urological cancers.” Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO). On the current state of urological cancer treatment: The meeting took place at in Marseille from 15-17 “We shouldn’t be working as separate, sometimes November, at the capable facilities of the Palais des opposing columns within medicine: collaboration is Congrès at the Parc Chanot. The congress centre was a vital to receive funding and improve care for the brief boulevard stroll away from the Mediterranean patient. We are starting to see multidisciplinary coast, with a temperate breeze being a warm clinics in the United States, where urologists buy their welcome to visitors from Northern Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Surgical Foreskin Restoration
    February 2016 Non-surgical Foreskin Restoration A publication of Doctors Opposing Circumcision www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org Seattle, Washington Foreskin restoration cannot truly replicate what was stolen, but it can and does provide a vast improvement on the circumcised state. Re-covering my glans improved my sexual function, my body image, and my sense of well-being. There was also a sense of alchemy, of personal victory over something that had seemed hopeless. ‒ J.L., Vancouver, B.C., born 1954 A significant number of circumcised men – in the U.S. and around the world – feel loss, resentment, betrayal, and anger over the violation of their bodies at birth. It takes only a minimal understanding of normal anatomy and function of the normal penis, and of the tawdry social history of circumcision in English language medicine, to understand these feelings of regret and the motivation these men have to restore. Doctors Opposing Circumcision heartily recommends foreskin restoration for those who feel drawn to restore. We estimate that more than 100,000 North American men have completed or are currently engaged in non-surgical foreskin restoration. We are available to advise those of our medical colleagues who encounter patients interested in non-surgical foreskin restoration. We will also gladly counsel men who have questions about restoration, or refer them to a knowledgeable medical professional in their region. Restoration, a safe and proven technique, does not require medical monitoring; however, a restorer may seek medical reassurance. D.O.C. is not alone in recommending against surgical foreskin restoration,[1] which may, we believe, lead to further scar tissue and nerve damage.
    [Show full text]
  • Male and Female Circumcision
    Male and Female Circumcision Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice Male and Female Circumcision Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice Edited by George C. Denniston. University of Wmhington Seanle, Washington Frederick Mansfield Hodges Wellcome Unitfor the History of Medicine University of O.$onl Oxford, England and Marilyn Fayre Milos National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers San Anselmo, California Kluwer Academic /Plenum Publishers New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow Llbrary of Congress Cataloglng-in-Publication Data Male and fenale circumcision : medical, legal. and ethical considerations in pediatric practice / edited by George C. Oenniston. Frederick Mansfield Hodges. andMarilyn Fayre Milos. p. cn.. "Proceedings of the Fifth International Synposiua onSexual Mutilations: Medlcal. Legal. andEthical Considerations in Pediatric Practice, held August 1998. in Oxford, Eng1and""T.p. verso. 5-7. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-306-46131-5 1. Circumcision Congresses. 2. Fenale clrcumclsion Congresses. 3. Circumcision--Moral and ethical aspects Congresses. 4. Fenale circuncision--Moral and ethical aspects Congresses. I. Denniston. George C. 11. Hodges. Frederick Mansfield. 111. Milos, Marilyn IV. Fayre. International Symposium on Sexual Mutilations (5th : Oxford. England) l998 : GN484.H35 1999 172'.2--dc21 99-37490 CIP Proceedings of the FiInternational Symposium on Sexual Mutilations: Medical, Legal, and Ethical Considerations in Pediatric Practice, held August 5-7.1998, in Oxford, England ISBN. 0-306-46131-5 0 1999 Kluwer Academiclplenum Publishers 233 Spring Street, New York, N.Y. 10013 l0987654321 A CAP. record for this book is available fromthe Library of Congress. All rights reserved No part of this book may be reprodud, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying.
    [Show full text]
  • Is Circumcision for Everyone?
    Is Circumcision for Everyone? by J.K. McKee A commonly quoted Scripture in the Messianic movement, in relation to Torah observance, has become Exodus 12:49: “The same law shall apply to the native as to the stranger who sojourns among you.” This Scripture is touted as meaning that all, both Jew and non-Jew, who follow the God of Israel, are applicable to torah echad or “one law.” This is used as a support to mean that all who follow the Holy One of Israel, are to follow the Torah or the Law of Moses. We most certainly agree with this conclusion and strongly believe that all Believers are to follow the “The same teaching” (CJB). However, if we place Exodus 12:49 in context, we will see that this specific instruction relates to Passover, and more specifically to the rite of circumcision: “But if a stranger sojourns with you, and celebrates the Passover to the L ORD , let all his males be circumcised, and then let him come near to celebrate it; and he shall be like a native of the land. But no uncircumcised person may eat of it” (Exodus 12:48). The issue of circumcision is one of the most hotly debated and discussed in the Messianic community today, with extremes on both the Left and the Right. On the Left, you have Messianic liberals who believe that physical circumcision is unimportant by any means, and then on the Right there are some Messianic extremists who believe that physical circumcision is required for salvation. There has to be a fair-minded perspective of this issue that seeks to be Biblical, not looking for loopholes in regard to Torah observance, but at the same time recognizes that circumcision of the flesh is not a salvation issue .
    [Show full text]
  • The Studies That Launched a Thousand Snips
    Early release, published at www.cmaj.ca on December 12, 2011. Subject to revision. CMAJ News December 6, 2011 The studies that launched a thousand snips Medical researchers may hope their work will eventually give rise to large-scale, well- funded health programs, but those dreams rarely come true. Though it can happen and indeed did happen to three sets of researchers who conducted clinical trials in Africa several years ago. Their research, which linked circumcision to lower rates of HIV transmission, drew support from high-profile luminaries, donations from well-heeled philanthropists and resulted in mass circumcision programs in several African countries. Opponents of circumcision, however, claim those much-praised trials aren’t all they were cracked up to be. “For the past 100 years, advocates for circumcision have been coming up with ideas of why to circumcise boys,” says Dr. George Denniston, founder of Doctors Opposing Circumcision, based in Seattle, Washington. “There was cancer of the penis, and then it was cancer of the cervix for their partners, and on and on. Now they have HIV. But the HIV studies are extremely flawed.” The first trial, published in 2005, was conducted on 3271 uncircumsized men in South Africa, and found that circumcision can reduce HIV transmission in heterosexual men by up to 61% (PLoS Med 2: e298. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020298). “The first and obvious consequence of this study is that MC [male circumcision] should be recognized as an important means to reduce the risk of males becoming infected by HIV,” the study states. “As shown by our study, MC is useful and feasible even among sexually experienced men living in an area with high HIV prevalence.” The second clinical trial was conducted in Rakai, Uganda, on 4996 uncircumcised men and found a reduction in HIV transmission of about 50% (Lancet 2007;369:643-56).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Foreskin Question Circumcision and Psychoanalysis
    On the Foreskin Question Circumcision and Psychoanalysis Jordan Harold Osserman 2017 A thesis presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University College London Centre for Multidisciplinary and Intercultural Inquiry I, Jordan Harold Osserman, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. Signed, ______________________ Abstract Male circumcision is a potent receptacle for fantasy. Whatever its medical benefits or harms, the significance of the practice has always extended to questions beyond the purely organic. By placing specific moments in the history of circumcision into dialogue with psychoanalytic theory, this dissertation demonstrates how circumcision is an inherently ambivalent procedure that enables multitudinous and contradictory responses to the constitutive encounter with lack to be played out on the site of the penis. Through circumcision – whether actual or spectral – the penis is put into relation with the symbolic phallus, allowing the organ to function as an image upon which fundamental questions of subjectivity may be posed. The dissertation begins with an introduction to the relevant psychoanalytic theory on castration, sexual difference, and the phallus, and then examines the extant historical, critical, and psychoanalytic literature relating to circumcision. Subsequently, three case studies are explored, over the course of four chapters: First, St. Paul’s abrogation of Jewish circumcision and its undertheorized role in debates surrounding “Pauline” universalism, considered from the divergent perspectives of Alain Badiou and Daniel Boyarin. Second, the nineteenth-century Anglo-American medicalization of circumcision (promoted as a cure for nervous illness), and the relationship between the “talking cure” and the “circumcision cure.” Finally, the libidinal undertones of contemporary political discourse, activism, and popular sentiment on circumcision.
    [Show full text]
  • Wo 2007/087452 A2
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (43) International Publication Date (10) International Publication Number 2 August 2007 (02.08.2007) PCT WO 2007/087452 A2 (51) International Patent Classification: GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IS, A61K 8/20 (2006.01) JP, KE, KG, KM, KN, KP, KR, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LT, LU, LV,LY,MA, MD, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, (21) International Application Number: MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PG, PH, PL, PT, RO, RS, PCT/US2007/002378 RU, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, SV, SY, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW. (22) International Filing Date: 29 January 2007 (29.01.2007) (84) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (25) Filing Language: English kind of regional protection available): ARIPO (BW, GH, GM, KE, LS, MW, MZ, NA, SD, SL, SZ, TZ, UG, ZM, (26) Publication Language: English ZW), Eurasian (AM, AZ, BY, KG, KZ, MD, RU, TJ, TM), European (AT,BE, BG, CH, CY, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, (30) Priority Data: FR, GB, GR, HU, IE, IS, IT, LT, LU, LV,MC, NL, PL, PT, 60/762,489 27 January 2006 (27.01.2006) US RO, SE, SI, SK, TR), OAPI (BF, BJ, CF, CG, CI, CM, GA, GN, GQ, GW, ML, MR, NE, SN, TD, TG). (71) Applicant (for all designated States except US): THER- AQUEST BIOSCIENCES, LLC [US/US]; 146 Medinah Declarations under Rule 4.17: Drive, Blue Bell, PA 19422-3212 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Female Genital Mutilation and Male Circumcision: Toward an Autonomy-Basedethical Framework’ (2015) 5(1) Medicolegal and Bioethics 89
    Almenn hegningarlög (bann við umskurði drengja) 114. mál, 148. lögg'afarþing 2017-2018. Dear Esteemed Madam or Sir, I have read with interest about the proposed circumcision ban in Iceland. The law, ethics, and policy of male and female genital cutting are my main academic areas of expertise, and I thought I might provide a few resources that may be helpful in your governmental deliberations. I am Research Fellow at the Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics at the University of Oxford and Associate Director of the Yale-Hastings Program in Ethics and Health Policy at Yale University and The Hastings Center. First, I am attaching an analysis of a recent court decision in England, in the matter of B and G, which classified male circumcision as a 'significant harm' but then tried to rescue the distinciton between it and female genital cutting by appealing to alleged health benefits and a distinction between religion and 'mere' culture. Since this will be a common objection to the proposed Icelandic law, I hope you will find this analysis especially helpful. In the essay, recently published in the Medical Law Review by Oxford University Press, I argue that the supposed distinctions concerning health and religion are not grounded in fact, but rather stereotypes about the two forms of genital cutting. That therefore, I conclude, if non-therapeutic female genital cutting is unlawful, then so must be non- therapeutic male genital cutting. This argument is explored further in the attached second essay, "In Defence of Genital Autonomy for Children," published by the Journal of Medical Ethics.
    [Show full text]
  • Fine-Touch Pressure Thresholds in the Adult Penis Sorrells
    Sexual Medicine FINE-TOUCH PRESSURE THRESHOLDS IN THE ADULT PENIS SORRELLS Fine-touch et al. pressure thresholds in the adult penis Morris L. Sorrells, James L. Snyder, Mark D. Reiss, Christopher Eden*, Marilyn F. Milos†, Norma Wilcox and Robert S. Van Howe‡ Retired, *HIV/AIDS researcher, San Francisco, CA, †National Organization of Circumcision Information Resource Centers, ‡Department of Paediatrics and Human Development, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, MI, USA Accepted for publication 22 October 2006 OBJECTIVE last ejaculation, ethnicity, country of birth, circumcision had lower pressure thresholds and level of education. than the ventral scar of the circumcised penis. To map the fine-touch pressure thresholds of the adult penis in circumcised and CONCLUSIONS uncircumcised men, and to compare the two RESULTS populations. The glans of the circumcised penis is less The glans of the uncircumcised men had sensitive to fine touch than the glans of the significantly lower mean (SEM) pressure uncircumcised penis. The transitional region SUBJECTS AND METHODS thresholds than that of the circumcised men, from the external to the internal prepuce at 0.161 (0.078) g (P = 0.040) when controlled is the most sensitive region of the Adult male volunteers with no history of for age, location of measurement, type of uncircumcised penis and more sensitive than penile pathology or diabetes were evaluated underwear worn, and ethnicity. There were the most sensitive region of the circumcised with a Semmes-Weinstein monofilament significant differences in pressure thresholds penis. Circumcision ablates the most sensitive touch-test to map the fine-touch pressure by location on the penis (P < 0.001).
    [Show full text]