Welcome to Miami!

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Welcome to Miami! Welcome to Miami! It is our pleasure to welcome you to beautiful Miami Beach! The next few days will be packed with opportunities to enjoy cutting-edge social neuroscience in a stunning environment. While you’re in town, we hope you will have the opportunity to visit some of South Florida’s famous sites, which you will find illustrated throughout the program. Enjoy! SANS 2019 Organizers Aaron Heller & Lucina Uddin With special thanks to Program Committee co-chairs: Johanna Jarcho and Dominic Fareri and Program Committee members: Dylan Gee, Brent Hughes, Amy Krosch, Maital Neta, Candance Raio, Kyle Ratner, Robb Rutledge, Greg Samanez-Larkin, Ajay Satpute, Diana Tamir and Dylan Wagner and Courtney Rogers and Bryce Dirks The New World Center is a concert hall in South Beach designed by Frank Gehry. new center Thursday May 2, Afternoon 3:00pm Welcome and Introductory Remarks Aaron Heller & Lucina Uddin 3:15pm Early Career Award Winner Jamil Zaki abstract 3:30pm Distinguished Scholar Address Nancy Kanwisher The Cortical Organization of Social Cognition Social perception and cognition have witnessed enormous progress over the last 20 years. We now know that that social cognition engages cortical regions quite distinct from those engaged in nonsocial aspects of cognition. Further, many cortical regions have been identified that conduct highly specific aspects of social cognition, from face perception, to language understanding, to theory of mind. This highly systematic cortical machinery is strikingly similar from one individual to the next, resulting in a richly detailed new map of social cognition in the brain. But while these discoveries constitute major progress, they are also the barest beginning, and reveal a vast landscape of new questions. What exactly is represented in each of these cortical regions, and how do the computations that produce those representations unfold over time? How are these regions structurally connected to each other and to the rest of the brain, and how do they interact with each other to produce real-world social cognition? And finally, how does the cortical organization of social cognition arise, both developmentally and evolutionarily? These questions will be harder to answer with current methods, but are well worth the effort. Vizcaya Museum is a villa and estate featuring extensive Italian Renaissance gardens. Thursday May 2, Afternoon 4:30pm Presidential Address Michael Tomasello Becoming Human: A Theory of Ontogeny Over the past two decades, my colleagues and I have documented many differences in the cognitive and social abilities of human children and their nearest great ape relatives. In this talk, I attempt to bring these studies together into a coherent theory of the ontogeny of uniquely human psychology. For each of eight uniquely human developmental pathways - four cognitive and four sociomoral – there are two key transitions: one at 9 months and one at 3 years. The hypothesis is that these transitions result from the maturation of new capacities for cooperation and social coordination with others - first joint intentionality with particular others and then collective intentionality with the group - which make possible new kinds of sociocultural experience and social self-regulation. 6:00pm Poster Session A & Welcome Reception at New World Center Miami Beach features radiant sun, surf and sand in close proximity to Art Deco architecture, nightclubs, and restaurants. Friday May 3, Morning 8:00am- 9:00am Breakfast 9:00am Symposium 1 Social Neuroscience Meets Network Neuroscience Avram Holmes: The functional connectomics of affective and psychotic pathology Converging evidence indicates that groups of patients with nominally distinct psychiatric diagnoses are not separated by sharp or discontinuous neurobiological boundaries. In healthy populations, individual differences in behavior are reflected in variability across the collective set of functional brain connections (functional connectome). These data suggest that the spectra of transdiagnostic symptom profiles observed in psychiatric patients may map onto detectable patterns of network function. To examine the manner through which neurobiological variation might underlie clinical presentation, we obtained functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from over 1,000 individuals, including 210 diagnosed with a primary psychotic disorder or affective psychosis (bipolar disorder with psychosis and schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder), 192 presenting with a primary affective disorder without psychosis (unipolar depression, bipolar disorder without psychosis), and 608 demographically matched healthy comparison participants recruited through a large-scale study of brain imaging and genetics. Here, we examine variation in functional connectomes across psychiatric diagnoses, finding striking evidence for disease connectomic “fingerprints” that are commonly disrupted across distinct forms of pathology and appear to scale as a function of illness severity. The presence of affective and psychotic illnesses was associated with graded disruptions in frontoparietal network connectivity (encompassing aspects of dorsolateral prefrontal, dorsomedial prefrontal, lateral parietal, and posterior temporal cortices). Conversely, other properties of network connectivity, including default network integrity, were preferentially disrupted in patients with psychotic illness, but not patients without psychotic symptoms. This work allows us to establish key biological and clinical features of the functional connectomes of severe mental disease. Nathan Spreng: Loneliness and meaning in life are reflected in the intrinsic network architecture of the brain Social relationships imbue life with meaning, whereas loneliness diminishes the sense of meaning in life. Yet the extent of interdependence between these psychological constructs remains poorly understood. Loneliness and meaning are associated with different patterns of functional connectivity; however, no studies have investigated this directly. We took a multivariate network approach to examine resting-state fMRI functional connectivity’s association with loneliness and meaning in a large cohort of adults (N=942). Loneliness and meaning in life were negatively correlated with one another. Functional brain regions were individually parcellated. Whole-brain measures of functional connectivity were then related to meaning and loneliness and a significant and reliable pattern was observed. Greater loneliness was associated with dense, and less modular, connections between default, frontoparietal and externally-directed attention and perceptual networks. A greater sense of life meaning was associated with increased, and more modular, connectivity between default and limbic networks. Low loneliness was associated with more modular brain connectivity, and lower life meaning was associated with higher between-network connectivity. These findings advance our understanding of loneliness and life meaning as distinct, yet interdependent, features of sociality. The results highlight a potential role of the default network as a central hub, providing a putative neural mechanism for shifting between feelings of isolation and purpose. Meghan Meyer: Social by Default: Characterizing the Social Functions of the Resting Brain Social neuroscience research has identified a set of medial frontoparietal brain regions that reliably engage during social cognition. At the same time, cognitive neuroscience research has shown that these regions comprise part of the default network, so named because they reliably activate during mental breaks ‘by default.’ While the anatomical similarity between the social brain and the default brain is well-documented, why this overlap exists remains a mystery. Does the tendency to engage these regions by default during rest play particular social functions and if so, what might these be? Here it is suggested that the default network performs two critical social functions during rest: social priming and social consolidation. These constructs will be defined, recently published empirical findings that support them will be reviewed, and directions for future research on the topic will be proposed. Emily Falk: Brain and Social Network Dynamics Associated with Susceptibility to Social Influence Brain dynamics shape learning and behavior, and social context shapes brain structure and function. In this talk, I will present evidence from a series of studies in adolescents linking brain network dynamics to individual differences in social network structure. Specifically, I will focus on how brain systems implicated in processing social rewards, social threats, and more general understanding of others’ mental states are associated with different types of social network properties, and in turn how these differences relate to adolescent susceptibility to social influence. The Everglades National Park provides a habitat for rare and endangered species like the crocodile. Friday May 3, Morning 10:30am Data Blitz 1. Kevin Tan: Mentalizing about the self and others: a human intracranial electrophysiology study 2. Eliska Prochazkova: Body-to-body synchrony: real-life dating experiment 3. Arjun Ramakrishnan: Determining biomarkers for anxiety by studying the neural basis of foraging behavior 4. KM Sharika: Acetaminophen reduces the sensitivity of macaque anterior cingulate gyrus neurons to the valence of decision outcomes for self and other 5. Anita Tusche: Individual differences in mentalizing are associated
Recommended publications
  • 2010 Program Meeting Schedule
    Vision Sciences Society 10th Annual Meeting, May 7-12, 2010 Naples Grande Resort & Club, Naples, Florida Program Contents Board, Review Committee & Staff . 2 Satellite Events. 22 Keynote Address . 3 Club Vision Dance Party. 22 Meeting Schedule . 4 Open House . 23 Schedule-at-a-Glance . 6 Member-Initiated Symposia . 24 Poster Schedule . 8 Friday Sessions . 29 Talk Schedule . 10 Saturday Sessions . 33 Young Investigator Award . 11 Sunday Sessions . 43 Abstract Numbering System. 11 Monday Sessions . 53 VSS Dinner and Demo Night . 12 Tuesday Sessions . 58 VSS Public Lecture . 15 Wednesday Sessions . 68 VSS at ARVO . 15 Topic Index. 71 Attendee Resources . 16 Author Index . 74 Exhibitors . 19 Hotel Floorplan . 86 Travel Awards . 21 Advertisements. 89 Board, Review Committee & Staff Board of Directors Abstract Review Committee Tony Movshon (2011), President David Alais Laurence Maloney New York University Marty Banks Ennio Mingolla Pascal Mamassian (2012), President Elect Irving Biederman Cathleen Moore CNRS & Université Paris 5 Geoff Boynton Shin’ya Nishida Eli Brenner Tony Norcia Bill Geisler (2010), Past President Angela Brown Aude Oliva University of Texas, Austin David Burr Alice O’Toole Marisa Carrasco (2012), Treasurer Patrick Cavanagh John Reynolds New York University Marvin Chun Anna Roe Barbara Dosher (2013) Jody Culham Brian Rogers University of California, Irvine Greg DeAngelis Jeff Schall James Elder Brian Scholl Karl Gegenfurtner (2013) Steve Engel David Sheinberg Justus-Liebig Universität Giessen, Germany Jim Enns Daniel Simons
    [Show full text]
  • Consciousness, Accessibility, and the Mesh Between Psychology and Neuroscience
    BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES (2007) 30, 481–548 Printed in the United States of America doi: 10.1017/S0140525X07002786 Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience Ned Block Department of Philosophy, New York University, New York, NY 10003 [email protected] Abstract: How can we disentangle the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness from the neural machinery of the cognitive access that underlies reports of phenomenal consciousness? We see the problem in stark form if we ask how we can tell whether representations inside a Fodorian module are phenomenally conscious. The methodology would seem straightforward: Find the neural natural kinds that are the basis of phenomenal consciousness in clear cases – when subjects are completely confident and we have no reason to doubt their authority – and look to see whether those neural natural kinds exist within Fodorian modules. But a puzzle arises: Do we include the machinery underlying reportability within the neural natural kinds of the clear cases? If the answer is “Yes,” then there can be no phenomenally conscious representations in Fodorian modules. But how can we know if the answer is “Yes”? The suggested methodology requires an answer to the question it was supposed to answer! This target article argues for an abstract solution to the problem and exhibits a source of empirical data that is relevant, data that show that in a certain sense phenomenal consciousness overflows cognitive accessibility. I argue that we can find a neural realizer of this overflow if we assume that the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness does not include the neural basis of cognitive accessibility and that this assumption is justified (other things being equal) by the explanations it allows.
    [Show full text]
  • Function Follows Form: How Connectivity Patterns Govern Neural Responses by David Eugene Osher B.Sc
    Function Follows Form: How Connectivity Patterns Govern Neural Responses by David Eugene Osher B.Sc. Psychology The Ohio State University 2006 SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF BRAIN AND COGNITIVE SCIENCES IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN NEUROSCIENCE AT THE MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2013 © David E. Osher, MMXIII. All rights reserved The author hereby grants to MIT permission to reproduce and distribute publicly paper and electronic copies of this thesis document in whole or in part in any medium now known or hereafter created. Author.......................................................................................................................... David E. Osher Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences May 3, 2013 Certified by.................................................................................................................. John D. E. Gabrieli Grover Hermann Professor in Health Sciences, Technology and Cognitive Neuroscience Thesis Supervisor Accepted by................................................................................................................. Matthew A. Wilson Sherman Fairchild Professor of Neuroscience Director of Graduate Education for Brain and Cognitive Sciences Page 1 of 129 Function Follows Form: How Connectivity Patterns Govern Neural Responses by David Eugene Osher Submitted to the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences on May 3 2013, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy
    [Show full text]
  • Human Brain Mapping Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping
    edited by Stephen José Hanson and Martin Bunzl FOUNDATIONAL ISSUES IN Human Brain Mapping Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping Foundational Issues in Human Brain Mapping edited by Stephen Jose´ Hanson and Martin Bunzl A Bradford Book The MIT Press Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England ( 2010 Massachusetts Institute of Technology All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying, recording, or information storage and retrieval) without permission in writing from the publisher. MIT Press books may be purchased at special quantity discounts for business or sales promotional use. For information, please email [email protected] or write to Special Sales Depart- ment, The MIT Press, 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. This book was set in Stone Serif and Stone Sans on 3B2 by Asco Typesetters, Hong Kong. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Foundational issues in human brain mapping / edited by Stephen Jose´ Hanson and Martin Bunzl. p. ; cm. ‘‘A Bradford Book.’’ Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-262-01402-1 (hardcover : alk. paper)—ISBN 978-0-262-51394-4 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Brain mapping. 2. Brain—Magnetic resonance imaging. I. Hanson, Stephen Jose´. II. Bunzl, Martin. [DNLM: 1. Brain Mapping. 2. Brain—physiology. 3. Data Interpretation, Statistical. 4. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 5. Research Design. WL 335 F771 2010] QP385.F68 2010 612.8'2—dc22 2009036078 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Contents Acknowledgments vii Introduction ix I Location and Representation 1 1 A Critique of Functional Localizers 3 Karl J.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgment for Reviewers 2008
    The Journal of Neuroscience, January 2009, 29(1) Acknowledgment For Reviewers 2008 The Editors depend heavily on outside reviewers in forming opinions about papers submitted to the Journal and would like to formally thank the following individuals for their help during the past year. Fox Aaron David G. Amaral Alberto Bacci Philip A. Barker Lawrence Abbott Emilio Ambrosio Dominik Bachevalier Roger A. Barker Ted Abel Amir Amedi Jocelyne Bachevalier Carol A. Barnes Moshe Abeles Stephanie A. Amici Stephen A. Back Steven Barnes Asa Abeliovich Shimon Amir Aldo Badiani Susan C. Barnett Anissa Abi-Dargham Katrin M. Amunts David Badre Colin J. Barnstable Wickliffe C. Abraham Beau Ances Wolfgang Baehr Scott Barnum Jacques Abraini Anders H. Andersen Mathias Bahr Deborah J. Baro Andrey Abramov Richard A. Andersen Brian Bai Anne Baron-Van Evercooren Nora Abrous Adam Anderson Herwig Baier Maureen Barr Mildred Acevedo-Duncan Aileen J. Anderson Michael Baier Paula Q. Barrett Barry Ache Lloyd L. Anderson Yannick J. Bailly Luis F. Barros Paul Adams Michael C. Anderson Richard Baines Lawrence Barsalou Roger A. H. Adan Patrick N. Anderson Jaideep S. Bains Alison Barth R. Alison Adcock Rodrigo Andrade Wyeth Bair Daniel S. Barth John P. Adelman Katrin Andreasson Georgy Bakalkin Perry F. Bartlett Ralph Adolphs Michael C. Andresen Chris I. Baker Jason J. Barton Joelle Adrien S. Brian Andrews Gary Baker Raymond Bartus Patrick Aebischer Tim Andrews Harriet Baker Allan I. Basbaum Salvatore M. Aglioti Dora E. Angelaki Mark D Baker Susan Baserga Aric Agmon Alessandra Angelucci Vaishali P. Bakshi Greg J. Bashaw Norberto Aguirre Robert Anholt Evan Balaban Radhika Basheer Adriano Aguzzi Lucio Annunziato Fausto G.
    [Show full text]
  • [This Letter Is Closed Now, Accepting No More Signatures]
    March 31st, 2017 To: H.E. Réka Szemerkényi, Ambassador of Hungary to the United States of America Zoltán Balog, Minister of Human Capacities, Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary László Palkovics, Minister of State for Education, Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary Dear Ambassador Szemerkényi, Minister Balog, and Minister Palkovics, We are writing to express our dismay about the proposed legislation that would effectively end a 25-year history of scientific excellence in Budapest. As an international body of psychologists, neuroscientists, and cognitive scientists, we can tell you that our colleagues at Central European University are among the most respected in the world. Their intellectual legacy has had a global impact. We believe any city should count itself fortunate to have such a renowned center of academic excellence in its midst. The proposed legislation will make it effectively impossible for CEU to continue to occupy its current position as one of the foremost scientific institutions internationally. We respectfully ask that you preserve CEU’s ability to act as a center of leadership and innovation in Hungary and the world by withdrawing this legislation. [This letter is closed now, accepting no more signatures] Sincerely, 1. Laura Schulz, Professor of Cognitive Science, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT 2. Rebecca Saxe, Professor of Cognitive Science, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, MIT 3. John E. Richards, Carolina Distinguished Professor, Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina. 4. Michael Tomasello, Duke University, Durham, NC, and Max Planck for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany. 5. Philippe G. Schyns, Professor of Visual Cognition, Director of the Institute of Neuroscience and Psychology, university of Glasgow, UK 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Ise En Page 1 17/06/10 16:41 Page 1 09
    COUV_EXE+TRANCHES_QUADRI+SPE:Mise en page 1 17/06/10 16:41 Page 1 09 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS HFSPO is grateful for the support of the following organizations: Australia (AU) National Health and Medical Research Council ANNUAL REPORT 20 (NHMRC) Canada (CA) Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR) Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) European Union (EU) 09 European Commission – Directorate General Research (DG RESEARCH) European Commission – Directorate General APRIL 2009 - MARCH 2010 Information Society (DG INFSO) France (FR) Ministère des Affaires Étrangères et Européennes (MAEE) ANNUAL REPORT Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche (MESR) Communauté Urbaine de Strasbourg (CUS) Région Alsace Human Germany (DE) Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) Frontier India (IN) Science Department of Biotechnology (DBT), Ministry of Science and Technology Program Italy (IT) Ministry of Education, University and Research Japan (JP) Ministry for Economy, Trade and Industry (METI) Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) Republic of Korea (KR) Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST) New Zealand (NZ) Health Research Council (HRC) Norway (NO) The Research Council of Norway (RCN) Switzerland (CH) State Secretariat for Education and Research (SER) The International Human Frontier Science Program Organization (HFSPO) United Kingdom (UK) 12 quai Saint-Jean - BP 10034 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) 67080 Strasbourg CEDEX - France Medical Research Council (MRC) Fax. +33 (0)3 88 32 88 97 e-mail: [email protected] United States of America (US) Website: www.hfsp.org National Institutes of Health (NIH) HUMAN FRONTIER SCIENCE PROGRAM National Science Foundation (NSF) Japanese Website: http://jhfsp.jsf.or.jp HUMAN FRONTIER SCIENCE PROGRAM The Human Frontier Science Program is a unique program funding basic research of the highest quality at the frontier of the life sciences that is 09 innovative, risky and requires international collaboration.
    [Show full text]
  • Cogsci 2020 Virtual Program Booklet
    CogSci 2020 Virtual Program Booklet Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines INVITED SPEAKERS INVITED PANELS Cecilia Heyes Deep Integration of Development and Cognitive Science Geoffrey Hinton Social, Cultural, and Linguistic Constraints on Development Janet Werker Statistical Learning and Development Co-Chairs: Stephanie Denison | Michael Mack | Yang Xu | Blair C. Armstrong Program for the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society 29 July – 1 August 2020 Developing a Mind: Learning in Humans, Animals, and Machines Program Chairs: Stephanie Denison, Michael Mack, Yang Xu, Blair C. Armstrong http://www.cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-2020 Dear Colleagues, Welcome to the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society and our first ever virtual meeting! This year’s conference brings together the latest research across all of Cognitive Science and also highlights the theme Developing a mind: Learning in humans, animals, and machines. In addition to the Rumelhart Prize keynote presentation by Stanislas Dehaene (Collège de France), the program features three plenary speakers: Janet Werker (University of British Columbia), Geoffrey Hinton (Google Research & Vector Institute), and Cecilia Heyes (University of Oxford), as well as three invited symposia. Further, the program includes a symposium to celebrate the inaugural winner of the Elman Prize: Jenny Saffran, and a symposium for the Robert J. Glushko Dissertation Awards. The keynotes and invited symposia showcase the broad spectrum of ideas that encompass the conference theme of development. The program committee for CogSci 2020 received 1,174 submissions, including 841 full papers, 302 member abstracts, 12 publication-based talks, as well as 9 proposals for symposia, and 9 for workshops and tutorials.
    [Show full text]
  • Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2019
    Acknowledgment of Reviewers, 2019 PNAS would like to thank all the individuals who dedicated their considerable time and expertise to the journal by serving as reviewers in 2019. Their generous contribution is deeply appreciated. A Dean C. Adams Bahareh Ajami Karen Alim Jorge Alvarez-Solas Mu A Michael W. W. Adams Michael Akam Dan Alistarh James C. Alwine Rolf Aalto Michael Adams Masaki Akaogi Kari Alitalo Teresa Amabile Duur K. Aanen Philip Adams Schahram Akbarian Jennifer M. Alix-Garcia Rudolf Amann Maria Abascal Russell Adams Erol Akçay Saed Alizamir Katrin Amann-Winkel Adam R. Abate Mokhtar Adda-Bedia Seun Akeju Richard Alkire Susan G. Amara Cory Abate-Shen Louigi Addario-Berry Mark Akeson Eric Allan Luis A. Nunes Amaral Abul K. Abbas Donna Rose Addis Huda Akil David Alland Gaya K. Amarasinghe Jon Abbatt Zach N. Adelman Modupe Akinola Hunt Allcott Kapil Amarnath Patrick Abbot Hillel Adesnik Masashi Akiyama Benjamin L. Allen Richard Ambinder Karen C. Abbott William Neil Adger Takahiko Akiyama David T. Allen Sandro Ambuehl Larry Abbott Achyuta Adhvaryu Michael Aklin Eric E. Allen Ken-ichi Amemori Nicholas L. Abbott Claire L. Adida Georgiy Akopov Jenny Allen Jan Amend Zakia Abdelhamed Jess F. Adkins Klaus Aktories Karen N. Allen Seth A. Ament Mohamed H. Frederick R. Adler Alessandro Alabastri Micah Allen Stefano Amente Abdel-Rahman Nancy E. Adler Petri Ala-Laurila Nicola J. Allen Manuel R. Amieva Omar Abdel-Wahab Ralph Adolphs Richard Alba Paul M. Allen Sebastian Amigorena Ikuro Abe Tobias Adrian Joseph Albanesi Stefano Allesina Ariel Amir Guy J. Abel Markus Aebi Umberto Albarella Heidi Alleway Ido Amit Laurent Abel Shuchin Aeron Jawdat Al-Bassam David B.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Specificity in the Human Brain: a Window Into The
    Functional specificity in the human brain: A window INAUGURAL ARTICLE into the functional architecture of the mind Nancy Kanwisher1 McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 This contribution is part of the special series of Inaugural Articles by members of the National Academy of Sciences elected in 2005. Contributed by Nancy Kanwisher, April 16, 2010 (sent for review February 22, 2010) Is the human mind/brain composed of a set of highly specialized The second ongoing controversy concerns the question of components, each carrying out a specific aspect of human cognition, whether only basic sensory and motor functions are carried out or is it more of a general-purpose device, in which each component in functionally specialized regions, or whether the same might be participates in a wide variety of cognitive processes? For nearly two true even for higher-level cognitive functions. Although one might centuries, proponents of specialized organs or modules of the think that Broca settled this matter with his demonstration that the mind and brain—from the phrenologists to Broca to Chomsky and left frontal lobe is specialized for aspects of language, the current Fodor—have jousted with the proponents of distributed cognitive status of this debate is far from clear. Indeed, a recent authorita- and neural processing—from Flourens to Lashley to McClelland and tive review of the brain-imaging literature on language concludes Rumelhart. I argue here that research using functional MRI is begin- that “areas of the brain that have been associated with language ning to answer this long-standing question with new clarity and processing appear to be recruited across other cognitive domains” precision by indicating that at least a few specific aspects of cogni- (2).
    [Show full text]
  • Program for the 41St Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society
    Program for the 41st Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society Montreal, QB 24 – 27 July 2019 Creativity + Cognition + Computation Program Chairs: Ashok Goel, Colleen Seifert, Christian Freksa http://www.cognitivesciencesociety.org/cogsci-2019 1 Dear Cognitive Science Colleagues, Welcome to the 41st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society in Montreal, Canada! Our meeting brings together some of the most innovative and exciting research in Cognitive Science today, and highlights the conference theme of Creativity + Cognition + Computation. In addition to the Rumelhart Prize presentation by Michelene Chi and the Carvalho-Heineken Prize presentation by Nancy Kanwisher, the program features three plenary speakers: Elizabeth Churchill (Google Research), Mary Lou Maher (University of North Carolina), and Takeshi Okada (University of Tokyo). Further, the program includes the Jacobs Foundation Symposium, How Curious? The Need for Exploration and Discovery, as well as an invited symposium on Creativity in the Arts in addition to the Rumelhart Symposium on Translation Research in STEM Learning and the Glushko Ph.D. Dissertation Awards Symposium. These invited symposia and talks showcase the conference theme. The program committee for CogSci 2019 received 1110 submissions, including 810 full papers, 256 member abstracts, 13 publication-based short papers, as well as 14 proposals for symposia, 10 for workshops, and 8 for tutorials. After a rigorous review process, the committee selected 202 papers for oral presentation and inclusion in the conference proceedings (25%), 306 papers for poster presentation and inclusion in the proceedings (38%), and 163 papers for poster presentation with inclusion of abstracts in the proceedings (20%). We also selected 204 submitted member abstracts and accepted another 19 abstracts from full paper submissions as invited member abstracts.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Right Movesa Practical Guide to Scientifıc Management for P
    A Practical Guide to Scientifıc Management for Postdocs and New Faculty and New Postdocs for Management A Practical Guide to Scientifıc Making the Right Moves Making the Right Moves Faculty and New Postdocs for Management A Practical Guide to Scientifıc Making the Right Moves A Practical Guide to Scientifıc Management Making the Right Moves for Postdocs and New Faculty Beginning academic scientists face a variety of challenges in setting up their A Practical Guide to laboratories. Good research skills are only one part of the formula for success. Scientifıc Management for They have to hire and lead a research team, find grant support, publish, teach, mentor—and all the while work toward tenure. This book helps new Postdocs and New Faculty investigators think strategically and “make the right moves.” Making the Right Moves is a collection of practical advice, experiences, and opinions from seasoned biomedical investigators Burroughs Wellcome Fund and other professionals. Based on presentations and discussions from a course developed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute Burroughs Wellcome Fund and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, it is a valuable resource on scientific management for any tenure-track laboratory researcher at a university or medical center, as well as for scientists pursuing other career tracks. BWF HHMI 1-04-001-5K Making the Right Moves A Practical Guide to Scientifıc Management for Postdocs and New Faculty Based on the BWF-HHMI Course in Scientifıc Management for the Beginning Academic Investigator Burroughs Wellcome Fund Howard Hughes Medical Institute Research Triangle Park, North Carolina Chevy Chase, Maryland © 2004 by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Burroughs Wellcome Fund All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]