DOCSLIB.ORG

Code of Rules and Regulations for the Doctoral School of Health Sciences

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Code of Rules and Regulations for the Doctoral School of Health Sciences CODE OF RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES THE FACULTY OF HEALTH SCIENCES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF PÉCS PÉCS 2017 Doctoral Code of the Doctoral School of Health Sciences Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pécs The present Code is comprised by nine Chapters (ix) and 21 Sections (§) and is supplemented by 7 Appendices CONTENTS I. GENERAL RULES ...................................................................................................................... 3 II. THE COUNCIL OF THE DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND THE DOCTORAL AND HABILITATION BOARD .............................................................................. 4 III. THE DOCTORAL AND HABILITATION OFFICE ............................................................... 7 IV. LEADERS AND INSTRUCTORS OF THE PHD TRAINING ............................................... 8 V. THE DOCTORAL STUDENTS OF THE PHD TRAINING .................................................... 9 VI. THE PHD TRAINING ............................................................................................................ 12 VII. THE PROCEDURE OF EARNING THE PHD DEGREE .................................................... 20 VIII. SPECIAL REGULATIONS ................................................................................................. 26 IX. CLOSING REGULATIONS AND THE FORCE OF THE PRESENT CODE ...................... 27 APPENDICIES 1. KNOWLEDGE OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES ........................................................................ 28 2. CONDITIONS OF AWARDING THE DEGREE RELATED TO PUBLISHING .................. 29 3.THE PROCEDURE OF ADMITTANCE .................................................................................. 34 4. FEES TO BE PAID BY THOSE APPLYING AND ADMITTED TO THE DOCTORAL PROGRAMME ............................................................................................................................. 36 5.REMUNERATION OF THOSE PARTICIPATING IN THE INSTURCTION, THE PROCEDURE OF DEGREE AWARDING AND IN THE ORGANIZATION ........................... 38 6. THE CREDIT SYSTEM IN THE DOCTORAL INSTRUCTION ........................................... 39 7. SUBMITTING THE THESES AND DECLARATION OF ORIGINALITY .......................... 41 2 I. GENERAL RULES Section 1 (1) The legal source of the doctoral Code of the Doctoral School of Health Sciences at the Faculty of Health Sciences (hereinafter: the Faculty) of the University of Pécs (hereinafter: the University) is Act CCIV. of 2011 on the National Higher Education (hereinafter: NHE) and also Government Decree 387/2012. (XII.19.) on Doctoral Schools, Doctoral Procedures and Habilitation and Appendix 13 of the Rules and Regulation of the University of Pécs. Section 2 (1) The doctoral (PhD) degree (hereinafter: the PhD degree) as the highest qualification attainable at the university is awarded by the University to those who give evidence of knowledge and practical skills of high quality independent scientific research, on the basis of which have published novel research findings. (2) The doctoral (PhD) programme (hereinafter: the (PhD) programme) is a basic function of the Faculty aiming to prepare those having been admitted there to earn a PhD degree. (3) The Faculty in accordance with the decision made by the National Board for Accreditations in Higher Education (hereinafter: National Board for Accreditations, NBA) conducts organised doctoral instruction and degree awarding procedures in the field of medicine, focusing on health sciences. The PhD instruction is conducted in the Doctoral School of Health Sciences (hereinafter: The Doctoral Shool). Section 3 (1) The PhD degree can be earned: a.) in organised instruction b.) by recognising previously earned degrees (PhD degree earned abroad, Candidate of Sciences degree earned abroad, etc.) proving eligibility for high quality independent scientific research c.) in individual preparation starting with the academic year 2016/2017. (2) The organised form of PhD insturction is a fulltime training (fulltime instruction). (3) Individuals admitted to the organised doctoral training (hereinafter: the doctoral student) shall have students status at the University. The student status comes into force with registration for the training. (4) The doctoral student participating in the training can be: a) subsidised by the state or holding a Hungarian state scholarship (hereinafter: state scholarship holder) b) holder of another scholarship c) fee paying or self-supporting (hereinafter: self-supporting) 3 (5) Foreign citizens who are not under the force of Article 21 (1) of the Code of Studies and Examinations of the University may conduct their studies in self-supporting form excusively. (6) The length of the doctoral training shall be 36 months which can be broken down to periods of accountability (hereinafter: semesters). The schedule of semesters is adjusted to the schedule determined by the Faculty, based on Article 34 (4) of the Code of Studies and Examinations of the University. (7) In the case of students who enrol to their studies in or after the academic year 2016/2017, the length of the doctoral training shall be 48 months which can be broken down to periods of accountability (hereinafter: semesters). The schedule of semesters is adjusted to the schedule determined by the Faculty, based on Article 34 (4) of the Code of Studies and Examinations of the University. II. THE COUNCIL OF THE DOCTORAL SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES AND THE DOCTORAL AND HABILITATION BOARD Section 4 (1) The general regulation of the doctoral training and the procedure of awarding the PhD degree is the competence of the Doctoral and Habilitation Council of Health Sciences (hereinafter: DHCHS). (2) The DHCHS shall delegate from among its members a number of individulas equal to the number of accredited Doctoral Schools to the University Doctoral Board (hereinafter: UDB) as internal members. The DHCHS shall appoint deputies for cases of the internal members’ incapacitation. Deputies can only be selected from the group of founding members of the incapacitated internal members’ Doctoral School. (3) The doctoral training shall be conducted in the Doctoral School. Matters concerning the training conducted in the Doctoral School are managed by the Council of the Doctoral School (hereinafter: CDS). (4) Doctoral matters within the scope of the Faculty are within the competence of the Doctoral Code of the Doctoral School at the Faculty of the Health Sciences of the University of Pécs (hereinafter: Doctoral Code). Adopting and amending the Doctoral Code shall fall under the competence of the Faculty Council. (5) Decisions adopted by the CDS shall become effective upon the approval of the DHCHS. In cases of disapproval, the CDS is to rediscuss the matter in question; the new decision is to be made with the arguments for the disapproval of the previous decision in mind. (6) Over the DHCHS and the CDS, the supervisory rights are exercised by the Dean of the Faculty. Section 5 Doctoral and Habilitation Council of Health Sciences 4 (1) The DHCHS operates as a standing committee of the Faculty Council. Its Chair and members are delegated by the Doctoral School, elected by the Faculty Council and appointed by the Dean of the Faculty. (2) The DHCHS: a) the number of members including the Chair is minimum 7; b) the Chair shall be a recognised and reputable professor of the Faculty; c) the Chair and the internal members are selected from the founding members named in the accreditation procedudre of the Doctoral School; d.) shall have two external members with voting rights. They are recommended for election by the Doctoral School. (An external member is an individual with a scientific degree, who is not employed by the University and who meets the criteria for founding membership.) e) one member of the DHCHS with the right of voting is delegated by the Doctoral Student Council of the University of Pécs; f) The Dean is allowed to participate in the sessions of the DHCHS with the right of consultation. (3) Those who are dependent on or has family relationship with the applicant and those who cannot be expected to make objective decisions for any other reasons are not to participate in the work of the DHCHS in the particular matter. Family relations shall be interpreted as defined in Article 8:1 (1) 1. of Act V of 2013 on the Civil Code of Hungary. (4) The appointment of the Chair and members of the DHCHS is for 3 years and can be prolonged several times. (5) Rights and obligations of the DHCHS: a) elaboration of the Doctoral Code of the PhD degree awarding and PhD training and its modified versions and the appendices and submitting it to the Faculty Council for approval. b) submitting proposals for accrediting, modifying and terminating the Doctoral School to the UDB. c) proposal for admissions opportunities. d) decision about the principles of allocation of state scholarship holders’ posts within the Faculty e) decision about the admission to the doctoral training, exemption, application for awarding of the PhD degree, disciplines of the doctoral final examination, decision about the Chairs and members of admission, final and referees’ committees. f) proposal for awarding the PhD degree, for nostrification of foreign scientific degrees and awarding doctoral degrees with honour. g) the coordination of the operation of the CDS and also the approval of its decisions. h) proposal for setting the fees of the PhD training and the procedural fees awarding of the PhD degree and the
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IQAS International Education Guide
    International Education Guide FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF EDUCATION FROM THE FORMER USSR AND THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION Welcome to the Alberta Government’s International Education Guides The International Qualifications Assessment Service (IQAS) developed the International Education Guides for educational institutions, employers and professional licensing bodies to help facilitate and streamline their decisions regarding the recognition of international credentials. These guides compare educational systems from around the world to educational standards in Canada. The assessment recommendations contained in the guides are based on extensive research and well documented standards and criteria. This research project, a first in Canada, is based on a broad range of international resources and considerable expertise within the IQAS program. Organizations can use these guides to make accurate and efficient decisions regarding the recognition of international credentials. The International Education Guides serve as a resource comparing Alberta standards with those of other countries, and will assist all those who need to make informed decisions, including: • employers who need to know whether an applicant with international credentials meets the educational requirements for a job, and how to obtain information comparing the applicant’s credentials to educational standards in Alberta and Canada • educational institutions that need to make a decision about whether a prospective student meets the education requirements for admission, and who need to find accurate and reliable information about the educational system of another country • professional licensing bodies that need to know whether an applicant meets the educational standards for licensing bodies The guides include a country overview, a historical educational overview, and descriptions of school education, higher education, professional/technical/vocational education, teacher education, grading scales, documentation for educational credentials and a bibliography.
    [Show full text]
  • Current State and Development Directions Of
    A D A L T A JOURNAL OF INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH CURRENT STATE AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTIONS OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION’S INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION WITH THE CIS COUNTRIES IN THE FIELD OF TRAINING OF POST GRADUATE STUDENTS aANNA MALTSEVA, bNATALYA BARSUKOVA, cMARIA GUSEVA, dALEXANDR BIRUKOV, eYULIYA If the economic and political cooperation of the CIS countries is ALEKSAKHINA, fELENA GORSHKOVA, gIGOR RYZHOV mostly based on institutional interaction, then educational and scientific integration is based primarily on personal communications (Skakovskaya et al., 2018). It is personal aLurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School professional contacts in the scientific and educational Innovative Activity, Tver State University, Tver, Russian community that most often turn into institutional channels of Federation interstate cooperation, where joint research is made, educational bLurye Scientific and Methodological Center for Higher School programs are implemented, highly qualified personnel are Innovative Activity, Tver State University, Tver, Russian trained, scientists and scientific information are exchanged, and Federation promising directions for the development of modern science and cProject management Department, State University of education are discussed (Khoperskaya, 2016). management, Moscow, Russian Federation dProject management Department, State University of The development of international cooperation among the CIS management, Moscow, Russian Federation countries concerns not only the joint acquisition and use of new
    [Show full text]
  • 2014-2015 UNDERGRADUATE Catalog Working.Pub
    1 ……………………………………… …………………. ONE HUNDRED AND TWENTY FIVE YEARS OF EXCELLENCE Undergraduate Catalog 2014-2015 2 The Undergraduate Program………………………………28 Table of Contents Applying for Admission…………………………………….29 General Admission Information……………………………..3 Home Schooled Students……………………………………29‐30 Academic Calendar……………………………………………4 Transfer Students……………………………………………..30‐31, 50 Degrees Offered………………………………………………..5 International Students……………………………………….31 Equal Opportunity Policy…………………………………….6 Special (Non‐Degree) Students……………………………..32 Terms and Abbreviations……………………………….…….7‐10 Dual Credit Program………………………………………...32‐33 Readmission…………………………………………………..33 The University Math Placement………………………………………………34 An Overview of New Mexico Tech………………………….11 Advanced Placement Credit………………………………...35 The Campus……………………………………………………11 New Mexico Higher Education Articulation……………...36‐37 Brief History……………………………………………………11 Financial Aid for Undergraduate Students………………..38‐44 Mission, Vision, & Values…………………………………12‐13 Accreditation…………………………………………………...13 Expenses……………………………………………………....45 Research at New Mexico Tech Tuition & Fees………………………………………………...45‐46 Center for Energetic Materials & Devices…………………...14 Refunds………………………………………………………..47 Energetic Materials Research & Testing Center…………….14 Payment of Fees………………………………………………47‐48 Institute for Complex Additive Systems Analysis………….15 Definition of Fees……………………………………………..48‐49 IRIS/PASSCAL Instrument Center…………………………...15 Langmuir Lab for Atmospheric Research…………………...16 Undergraduate Student Status…………………………......50
    [Show full text]
  • Darwin Skeptics a Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who Are Skeptical of Darwinism
    7/23/2016 Darwin Skeptics A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who are Skeptical of Darwinism Compiled by Jerry Bergman PhD. It is commonly claimed that no scientist rejects macroevolution or Darwinism (by which is meant evolutionary naturalism, or the view that variation caused by mutations plus natural selection accounts for all life forms). For example, Dr. Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College of London, wrote that “no scientist denies the central truth of The Origin, the idea of descent with modification... plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Jones, 2000, pp. xvii, xxiii). Other writers avoid the words “all” or “no scientist” and claim instead that “almost no scientist” rejects Darwinism as defined above. In an article refuting “wiccan creationism,” the author claimed that evolutionary theory has been confirmed to such a high degree and has such great explanatory power that it is the central organizing principle of the biological sciences today. Modern biology is basically unthinkable outside of the context of evolution and that is why it is accepted without reservations by pretty much every working scientists [sic] in the life sciences. It also isn’t really questioned in the other natural sciences, either, like physics or chemistry. The author then makes the following absolutist statement: Evolution is taken as a fact—and while there might be disagreements about some of the details of how evolution proceeds, there are no disagreements about the idea that it does occur and that it is the explanation for the diversity of life on our planet.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctorate 1 Doctorate
    Doctorate 1 Doctorate A doctorate is an academic degree or professional degree that, in most countries, qualifies the holder to teach at the university level in the specific field of his or her degree, or to work in a specific profession. The research doctorate, or the Doctor of Philosophy (Ph.D.) and its equivalent titles, represents the highest academic qualification. While the structure of U.S. doctoral programs is more formal and complex than in some other systems, the research doctorate is not awarded for the preliminary advanced study that leads to doctoral candidacy, but rather for successfully completing and defending the independent research presented in the form of the doctoral dissertation (thesis). Several first-professional degrees use the term “doctor” in their title, such as the Juris Doctor and the US version of the Doctor of Medicine, but these degrees do not universally contain an independent research component or always require a dissertation (thesis) and should not be confused with PhD degrees or other research doctorates.[1] In fact many universities offer Ph.D followed by a professional doctorate degree or joint Ph.D. with the professional degree (most often Ph.D. work comes sequential to the professional degree): eg. Ph.D. in law after J.D. or equivalent [2][3][4][5] in physical therapy after DPT,[6][7] in pharmacy after DPharm.[8][9] Often such professional degrees are refereed as entry level doctorate program [10][11][12] and Ph.D as postprofessional doctorate. In some countries, the highest degree in a given field is called a terminal degree, although this is by no means universal (the term is not in general use in the UK, for example), practice varies from country to country.
    [Show full text]
  • Prof. Dr. Andrey Nikolaevich Dmitriev
    A curriculum vitae Prof. Dr. Andrey Nikolaevich Dmitriev 1950 (September, 11). Was Born in Village Elovo of the Perm Region (Russia). 1957-1966. Training in High School in Urban Village Cheremukhovo (Russia). 1967. Has Left High School in the City Severouralsk, Sverdlovsk Region (Russia), with a Silver Medal. My father Nikolay V. Dmitriev since 1948 for 2001 Worked on Joint-Stock Company “Severouralsk Bauxite Mines”, Obtaining Bauxite on the World's Largest Deposit. 1973. Has Ended Metallurgical Faculty of the Ural Polytechnical Institute (nowadays Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia). It is Awarded with the Honourable Diploma of a Student's Scientific Organization. 1973-1979. The engineer, the Younger Scientific Employee, the Post-Graduate Student of the Ural Polytechnical Institute (nowadays Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russia). 1979. Defence of the Dissertation on Competition of a Scientific Degree of Candidate of Technical Science (Ph.D. thesis; Ekaterinburg, Russia). 1979 – 2008. The Senior Scientific Employee, Head of laboratory for Pyrometallurgy of the Process Reductions (1998), Institute of Metallurgy of the Ural Branch (UB) of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS; Ekaterinburg, Russia). 1997. Defence of the Dissertation on Competition of a Scientific Degree of Doctor of Technical Science (thesis for a Doctor's degree; Institute of Metallurgy of UB of RUS, Ekaterinburg, Russia). 1999 – Present time. A Member of the Academic Council of Institute of Metallurgy of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. 1999 – 2004. The Judge “Ural Exhibitions”, Ekaterinburg, Russia. 2000 – Present time. The Head of Branch of faculty “Thermophysics and Computer Science in Metallurgy” of the Ural State Technical University - Ural Polytechnical Institute in Institute of Metallurgy of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Ekaterinburg, Russia).
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Degrees As a Status Characteristic of Russian University Teachers
    International Education Studies; Vol. 8, No. 5; 2015 ISSN 1913-9020 E-ISSN 1913-9039 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education Scientific Degrees as a Status Characteristic of Russian University Teachers Irina Yurievna Ilina1, Elena Mihajlovna Kryukova1, Alexandra Ivanovna Zotova1, Maxim Georgiyevich Chardymskiy1 & Nelli Zinnurovna Skudareva1 1 Russian State Social University, Moscow, Russia Correspondence: Elena Mihajlovna Kryukova, Russian State Social University, Moscow 129226, Russia. Received: November 14, 2014 Accepted: January 5, 2015 Online Published: April 28, 2015 doi:10.5539/ies.v8n5p165 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n5p165 Abstract This paper gives an assessment of the social and motivational value of scientific degrees of Russian university teachers. The author analyzes the historical experience and current trends in the transformation of the system of degrees. The paper shows the dynamics and structural characteristics of teachers with different professional and qualification status in the context of modernization of higher education. An assessment of salary level according to scientific degree is given. Based on the results of a sociological survey, behavior strategies in respect of earning a degree of candidate and doctor of sciences are identified. The principal status advantages of degree holders are described. Reasons for the discredit of the Russian system of scientific degrees are identified. Keywords: university teachers (professors), scientific degree, social status, modernization of higher education 1. Introduction Modernization of the system of higher education is a priority direction of the reforms currently under way in Russia. Today, the reasons for many negative trends typical for the Russian higher education, specifically, significant deterioration in the quality of the teaching profession, are widely discussed.
    [Show full text]
  • Employment of Phd Program Graduates in Russia
    Mironos et al. SpringerPlus (2015) 4:230 DOI 10.1186/s40064-015-1003-x a SpringerOpen Journal RESEARCH Open Access Employment of PhD program graduates in Russia: a study of the University of Nizhni Novgorod graduates’ careers Alexei A Mironos1*, Boris I Bednyi2 and Larisa A Ostapenko2 Abstract An analysis is presented of the employment of PhD program graduates of the State University of Nizhni Novgorod, one of Russia’s leading universities, from 2009 to 2013. We have studied the features of the career paths of graduates in different disciplines who specialized in natural sciences, social sciences and humanities. The lines of research are proposed for the further study of the issues of highly intellectual labor market development in Russia and employment of PhD program graduates. Keywords: Employment; Market of highly intellectual labor; PhD program; Surveys Introduction not all the problems have received equal attention. Al- One of the most visible expressions of globalization though the formation of the ideology of a new type of doc- processes taking place in the field of education is the toral education in the course of the Bologna process has Common European Higher Education Area (CEHEA) been the major focus of attention over the last decade, the that has been formed in Europe. The changes in the issues of adaptation in Russian universities of European higher education system are very extensive and multifa- models for organization of postgraduate training have not ceted. They affect not only the educational systems of been adequately explored (hereinafter in this text we will the leading European states, which initiated the Bologna consider the terms “postgraduate education”, “doctoral process in 1999, but also a much wider range of states education”, “level 6 of Tertiary education” used in Europe with significant specific features in the development of and the US as synonymous to the Russian term “post- their national educational systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Ages of The
    COMMENT DESIGN Evolution of CONSERVATION A history of the FILM Isabella OBITUARY Jurg Tschopp, conservation practice traced WWF at 50 makes sobering Rossellini on animal immunologist who in charity logos p.287 reading p.290 behaviour p.294 changed patients’ lives p.296 ILLUSTRATION BY OLIVER MUNDAY BY ILLUSTRATION Seven ages of the PhD Scientists share memories of doing doctorates in different decades, disciplines and locations, from the hunt for the structure of DNA to deciphering the human genome. studies of the sodium salt of DNA. One of Randall was exceptional because he found RAYMOND GOSLING the highlights of my PhD was the now iconic financial backing for all the members of his photo 51, a diffraction photograph I took, lab. The only other comparable example that 1950s: The age which clearly showed the helical structure I have experienced is the work at Cold Spring of the molecule (see image). I will always Harbour Laboratory in New York directed of formality remember the moment I first saw that beau- by James Watson. These days, students are tiful double diamond pattern. not always so fortunate and have to spend Emeritus professor, University of Of my two mentors, Maurice was friendly time and energy seeking funding. London and determined but very shy. Rosalind had a My advice to would-be doctoral students more combative style and taught me the value is to seek out a dynamic, flourishing research PhD in structural analysis of DNA (King’s of being a devil’s advocate, so challenging and group. Do not start until you have agreed College London, 1954).
    [Show full text]
  • Sara Buzadzhi ACADEMIC TERMS from RUSSIAN to ENGLISH As the World Becomes Smaller, More and More Students Are Doing Degrees Or
    Статья опубликована на сайте о переводе и для переводчиков «Думать вслух» http://www.thinkaloud.ru/featureak.html Sara Buzadzhi ACADEMIC TERMS FROM RUSSIAN TO ENGLISH As the world becomes smaller, more and more students are doing degrees or study programs outside their native countries, and more graduates are seeking employment in foreign countries. For those moving between Russia and the US, there are key differences in the educational systems, and therefore educational terminology, which can create confusion. Here translators from Russian to English face a difficulty; on the one hand, they want to be understood by foreign readers. On the other hand, our educational systems, while similar in many areas, are not identical, and translators feel rightly cautious of blurring the cultural differences between Russia and America, the UK, etc. This article will examine the most common academic terms and titles. As someone who went to school and college in the US, I will be providing primarily American terminology, and only offering British variants when I am confident of their validity. Universities and university structures Some general terminology in both languages is similar; you can talk about higher education (высшее образование) in Russian and English, as well as an institution/establishment of higher education, высшее учебное заведение. But there are some areas for confusion when it comes to specific names for the purveyors of this higher education. In America, these are split between colleges and universities, but the distinction is minimal and often unclear. Generally, universities are larger, and may contain different “schools” and “colleges,” while colleges tend to be smaller, and consist of departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Download the EPS MAPS Study
    MAPPING PHYSICS STUDENTS IN EUROPE Report prepared by Guillaume Troendle with guidance by David Lee, EPS Secretary General and Martin C.E. Huber, EPS President This report can also be downloaded from www.eps.org MARCH 2004 European Physical Society 34 rue Marc Seguin, BP 2136 F-68060 Mulhouse Cedex, France tel: +33 389 32 94 40 fax: +33 389 32 94 49 web: www.eps.org A general impression in most European countries is that the number of physics students, at all levels, is decreasing. Yet, no Europe-wide statistical study has been conducted to determine whether this is the case. In order to implement the ERA, an additional half a million scientists in all fields will be necessary. To gage the efforts needed to reach the objectives of the ERA (by 2010), it is necessary to have an accurate assessment of the situation regarding students in degree courses in science. The EPS, as Europe’s most comprehensive physics organization proposes to analyze the situation in physics in an overall perspective by mapping physics students in Europe. The purposes of the MAPS project are: - To provide information on the number of students entering physics degree courses over a five year period - To provide information on the number of students obtaining a physics degree over the same period - To compare the number of students studying and obtaining a degree in physics to the overall population of university students - to compare the number of students studying and obtaining a degree in physics with one other natural science (life science) and one social science (economics) Without being a political or social analysis, the MAPS Project includes facts, data and additional information needed to reach a better comprehension of the educational environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Phd Program in Kazakhstan: Prolonged Transit Or a Catching up Development?
    PhD Program in Kazakhstan: Prolonged Transit or a Catching up Development? “Kazakhstan, having based its quality assessment of scientific work on Western standards of assessment (Indexes), did not take into account the fact that its science finds itself on the periphery of contemporary Big Science. This situation severely limits, for example, the possibilities for Kazakh researchers being published in Western journals”, – Irina Chernykh, specially for cabar.asia, identifies problems and specificities of implementation of PhD programs in Kazakhstan. Follow us on LinkedIn! Higher and postgraduate education system in Kazakhstan has undergone systemic reforming over the years of independence, which was shaped by a dynamic socio-economic development of the country and its entry into the global market, and thus by the need to improve competitiveness of its human capital. For a period of more than twenty years, new conceptual approaches have been formulated and are being promoted (life-long education), pursuant to which a drastic change of educational model of the higher education has been made. Republic of Kazakhstan is one of the first countries in the former Soviet Union to have introduced a credit system of education (according to the Bologna Convention) and adopted a three-cycle academic system (higher basic education (Bachelor’s degree), higher specialized / academic and pedagogical education (Master’s degree) and Doctorate – PhD). A key element in the framework of a three-cycle higher education system is a program for preparing PhDs, as it is they, who are expected in accordance with their status to set a general benchmark in scientific and academic development, promote innovative projects and, on the whole, work towards qualitative modernization of the country in all spheres.
    [Show full text]