DOCSLIB.ORG

Ekotan Eood Assesment of Compatibility of Investment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ekotan Eood Assesment of Compatibility of Investment EKOTAN EOOD [email protected] mobile: 0889 855 869 mobile: 0889 895 805 Chief University Assistant D. Zahariev, Chief University Assistant N. Kodzabashev, Assistant Professor T. Michev, Prof. M. Stoyneva ASSESMENT OF COMPATIBILITY OF INVESTMENT PROPOSAL on gravel and sand extraction from alluvial sediments in the bed of the Danube River Kama Section (510.5 km. – 508.0 km.) In the area of Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Munucipality With Natura 2000 sites BGSPA0002024 Mechka fisheries ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei-Saica-Slobozia September 2012 Ecotan EOOD 1 CONTENTS 1. ANNOTATION OF THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 1.1. Basic technical and technological characteristics of the investment site Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2. Used raw materials, natural raw materials and resources and energy sources Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3. Necessity of permits, linked with the investment proposal Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4. Type and quantity of the expected wastes and emissions during the realization of the investment proposal Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.5. Characteristics of water sources and sources for water use for the site Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.6. Quantity and composition of waste water by flows – industrial, domestic and rain water. Treatment facilities Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.7. Closeness to protected territories and protected zones in Bulgaria Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. OTHER PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS/INVESTMENT PROPOSALS, EXISTING AND/OR IN PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT OR APPROVAL, WHICH IN COMBINATION WITH THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL CAN HAVE UNFAVORABLE IMPACT ON THE PROTECTED ZONES IN THE REGION ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 3. DESCRIPTION OF THE ELEMENTS OF IP, WHICH INDEPENDENTLY OR IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS/INVESTMENT PROPOSALS COULD HAVE SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON THE REVIEWED PROTECTED ZONES OR THEIR ELEMENTS 23 4. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROTECTED ZONES, HABITATS, SPECIES AND OBJECTIVES OF MANAGEMENT ON NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL LEVEL AND THEIR REFLECTION DURING THE PREPARATION OF THE PLAN FOR THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL 23 4.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 23 4.1.1. Description 24 4.1.2. Subject of conservation 25 4.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 26 4.2.1. Description 26 4.2.2.Subject of conservation 27 4.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 27 4.3.1. The conservation aims of the protected zone are the following: 28 4.3.2. Subject of conservation 28 2 5. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS OF THE LIKELIHOOD AND RATE OF IMPACT OF THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL ON THE SUBJECT OF CONSERVATION OF THE REVIEWED PROTECTED ZONES 29 5.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 29 5.1.1. On the types of habitats 29 5.1.2. On the species, subject to protection 29 5.1.3. Description and analysis of the impact of the investment proposal on the wholeness of the protected zone, considering its structure, functions and nature protection objectives (loss of habitats, fragmentation, disturbance of species, disturbance of the species composition , chemical, hydrological and geological changes and etc.), as well as during the realisation and explo itation of IP 45 5.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 46 5.2.1. On the types of natural habitats 46 5.2.2. On the species, subject to protection 46 5.2.3. Description and analysis of the impact of the investment proposal on the wholeness of the protected zone, considering its structure, functions and nature conservation aims (loss of habitats, fragmentation, disturbance of species, disturbance of the species composition, chemical, hydrological and geological changes and etc.), as well as during the reali sation and exploitation of IP 55 5.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 56 5.3.1. On the types of natural habit ats 56 5.3.2. On the species, subject to protection 57 5.3.3. Description and analysis of the impact of the investment proposal on t he wholeness of the protected zone, considering its structure, functions and nature conservation aims (loss of habitats, fragmentation, disturbance of species, disturbance of the species composition, chemical, hydrological and geological changes and etc.), as well as during the realisation and exploitation of IP 60 5.3.3.2. Functions and nature protection aims 61 6. MITIGATING MEASURES 63 6.1. Protected zone BGSPA000002024 Fisheries Mechka 63 6.1.1. During design 63 6.1.2. During construction 63 6.1.3. During exploitation 63 6.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 64 6.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei-Saica-Slobozia 65 7. ALTERNATIVE SOLUTIONS AND ASSESSMENT OF THEIR IMPACT 65 8. MAP MATERIAL 67 9. CONCLUSION ON THE TYPE AND RATE OF IMPACT ON BOTH PROTECTED ZONES 9.1. Characteristics of the investment proposal 67 9.2. Characteristics of other plans, programs and projects/investment proposals , existing or in process of development or approval, which in combination with the assessed investment proposal can have unfavorable impact on the reviewed protected zones 68 9.3. Characteristics of the protected zones 68 3 9.4. Area of impact 69 9.4.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 69 9.4.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 69 9.4.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 69 9.5. Rate of impact on the types of natural habitats 69 9.5.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 69 9.5.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 69 9.5.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 69 9.6. Rate of impact on the habitats and populations of species, subject to conservation 70 9.6.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 70 9.6.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 70 9.6.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 70 9.7. Impacts on the nature conservation aims and on the wholeness of the protected zones 70 9.8. Likely mitigating and/or recuperation measures 70 9.8.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 70 9.8.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 70 9.8.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 71 9.9. Availability of alternative solutions 71 9.10. Availability of reasons of primary public interest in the realization of the investment proposal or considerations in connection with human health , public security or positive impacts on the environment. 71 9.11. Proposed compensation measures 71 9.12. General conclusion 71 9.12.1. Protected zone BGSPA0002024 Fisheries Mechka 71 9.12.2. Protected zone ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare 72 9.12.3. Protected zone ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei -Saica-Slobozia 72 10. INFORMATION ON THE USED METHODS OF RESEARCH, METHODS FOR PROGNOSTICATION AND ASSESMENT OF THE IMPACT AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION 72 11. METHODOLOGY FOR QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF THE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON THE SPECIES OF BIRDS-SUBJECT TO PROTECTION 73 12. SOURCES 76 13. ANNEXES 80 13.1. Scheme of island Каmа with location of IP 80 13.2. REFERENCE FOR PPP/IP ALONG RIVER DANUBE, submitted by RIEW-Ruse with decision №343/1.08.2012 (in bege color are marked the sites close to the region of t he reviewed IP) 81 13.3. Documents of Prof. Dr. Маya Stoyneva 85 4 This Investment Proposal was drawn up on the grounds of Article 31, para 4 of the Biological Diversity Act and Ordinance on the conditions and procedures for assessing the compatibility of plans, programs, projects and investment proposals with the objects and purposes of the conservation of protected areas (State Gazette issue 73/2007). The guidelines contained in the letters of the Ministry of Environment and Waters with ref. No OVOSU 8862 and OVOSU 8863 dated 30.06.2011, and letter ref. No OVOSU - 8862, letter ref. No 8863/02.12.2011, the opinion expressed in letter ref. No OVOSU-8862/11.06.2012, and part of the recommendations made during the workshop in July 2012, presided by Deputy Minister Mrs. Evdokia Maneva were also taken into account. In determining the cumulative effect of the realization of this investment proposal (IP) information provided by the Ministry, IAPPD and RIEW Rouse was used. The following sources were used as scientific basis for the preparation of the current assessment: Golemanski and others. (ed.). 2 011. Red Book of Bulgaria. Volume 2. Animals. IBER-BAS & MEW, Sofia, p. 383 Paspalev-Antonova, M. 1961b. Studying ornithology of the Bulgarian Danube bank. S. (dissertation candidate). Yankov, P. (ed.). 2007. Atlas of Breeding Birds in Bulgaria, Bulgarian Society for the Protection of Birds, Conservation serie s, book 10, p. 679 (in Bulgarian and English), p. 679 Lorenz-Liburnau, L., 1893. Ornithologische Bruchstucke aus dem Gebiete der Unteren Donau. - Orn. Jahrbuch 4: 12-23. Munteanu, D. 2005. Cartea rosie a vertebratelor din Romania. Muzeul national de istor ie naturala “G. Antipa”, Bucresti, 260 pp, ISBN 973 -0-03943-7. Reiser, O. 1894. Materalien zu einer Ornis balcanica. II. Bulgarien. Wien. In Commission bei Carl Gerold's Sohn: 204 pp. Shurulinkov, P., I. Nikolov, D. Demerdzhiev, K. Bedev, H. Dinkov, G. Da skalova, S. Stoychev, I. Hristov & A. Ralev. 2008. On the actual breeding distribution and numbers of colonially nesting herons and cormorants in Bulgaria. - Orn. Mitteilungen 59 (11): 370—378 [PDF]. 5 1. Summary of the proposal The Investment Proposal is located on Bulgarian territory near the Romanian islands of Dinu and Kama between the 510.5 and 508.0 river kilometre. This compatibility assessment was drafted for a broader range - from km 512.0 to km 508.0. 1.1. General technical and technological characteristics of the investment site Extraction of alluvium (sand and gravel) from the Danube River will be done by using floating multi-bucket dredger. Alluvium from the buckets will be transferred to a drying sieve and from there to self-propelled barges for transport to a wharf for unloading.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation on the Regulatory and Administrative Framework Affecting Tourism
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Service Industries Tourism Policy Public consultation on the regulatory and administrative framework affecting tourism 1. INTRODUCTION The consultation was carried out between 12 December 2013 and 21 March 2014. The objective was to identify EU, national, regional and local policy initiatives (legislative or not) and administrative practices, where there may still be scope for further reduction of the burden for SMEs, and in particular for micro businesses, as well as for EU tourism destinations, public administrations and tourists visiting EU Member States from within or outside Europe. It equally aimed at identifying good practices and success stories at all administrative levels. It is important to underline that the consultation was not part of the Commission’s formal Regulatory Fitness (REFIT) exercise. Its questions were concerning general regulatory and administrative areas without referring to specific measures or practices. This was necessary in order to be able to incorporate various regulatory and administrative levels (i.e. EU, national, regional and local) in its scope. The consultation pointed out to 12 policy areas, each of which divided in sub-areas. The complete list is provided in Annex 1. For each sub-area, respondents were asked to indicate the nature of the burden (at EU, national, regional and local) picking among the different options (Too costly – Unnecessary - Too restrictive - Too excessive - Too complex - Lacks transparency - Lacks protection – Others). The analysis of the outcome of this consultation is intended to remain factual and to provide general information to the Commission as well as to public and private stakeholders, without any concrete follow-up measure in sight for the time being.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2 PES-Bulgaria
    ‘Complementary financing for Environment in the context of Accession - Innovative sources’ National level analysis Country: Bulgaria Authors: Maya Todorova Yuliya Grigorova and Yanka Kazakova August 2007 Citation and disclaimer This report should be quoted as follows: Todorova, M., Grigorova, Y. & Kazakova Y. 2007. Complementary Financing for Environment in the Context of Accession – Innovative Resources: National Report Bulgaria. A project for the European Commission (contract 070201/2006/443879/MAR/E3). WWF Danube Carpathian Programme. 35 pp + Annexes. The contents and views contained in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. WWF is the world largest and most effective conservation organization. The mission of WWF is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment, and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of the renewable natural resources is sustainable and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. WWF Danube Carpathian Programme (WWF DCP) is responsible for leading and to a significant extent implementing WWF’s efforts to preserve, restore and sustainably manage the natural values of the Danube-Carpathian ecoregions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CASE STUDY AREA......................................... 4 2 SWOT ANALYSIS......................................................................................18 3 DEVELOPMENTS AND
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria
    Translation from Bulgarian REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DECISION No. 6-4/2013 Subject to Article 99 (2) of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA), Article 19 (1) of the Ordinance on the terms and conditions of environmental impact assessment (the EIA Ordinance) and in conjunction with Article 31 of the Biological Diversity Act (BDA) and Article 39 (12), in conjunction with Article 39 (13) of the Ordinance on the terms and conditions of compatibility assessment of plans, programs, projects and investment proposals with the scope and purpose of conservation of protected areas (CA Ordinance), I hereby APPROVE The implementation of the investment proposal for: Extraction of sand and gravel from alluvial deposits in the bed of the Danube River, Kama Section (from 510.5 km to 508.0 km) in the vicinity of the Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Municipality, Ruse Region. Contracting Authority: Gravel and Sand Quarries –Bulgaria EAD, Sofia Registered Office: 6 Poruchik Nedelcho Bonchev Str., Iskar District, 1528 Sofia Short description of the investment proposal: Based on the conducted studies and the sand and gravel deposits in the Kama Section (from 510.5 km to 508.0 km) in the vicinity of the Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Municipality, Gravel and Sand Quarries –Bulgaria EAD, Sofia has coordinated the section for the extraction of aggregates from the bed of the Danube River with the Executive Agency for Exploration and Maintenance of the Danube River (EAEMDR), with the initially specified length of the section from 512.0 km to 508.0 km being reduced to preserve the sand deposits over the “head” of the Kama Island, which could otherwise lead to the need of shifting the fairway from the navigable channel, currently between the Kama Island and the Romanian bank, to the channel between the island and the Bulgarian bank which will result in termination of the permission to extract in the whole section.
    [Show full text]
  • Bread Connects
    Online International Conference Sharing beyond borders – New ways for care, communication and cooperation of older people along the Danube and in Europe in times of COVID-19 10-11h July, 2020, Ulm, Germany Assoc. Prof. Emiliya VELIKOVA, PhD University of Ruse, Bulgaria; DANET e.V., Germany [email protected] Aims to connect countries in the Danube Region by sharing their intangible cultural heritage to foster awareness of some common cultural roots to preserve the traditions and customs, the cultural and historical heritage of the Danube region and to pass them on to the next generations to connect people on an intellectual and on an emotional level. Participants from Germany, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Romania, Croatia, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Ukraine, Bosnia and Hercegovina 14 Unions of Pensioners with 76 Clubs and 13 000 members 12 11 NGO’s Structure of Municipalities 12 Others Associations the cluster of Partners of the University partner of Ruse 32 Local 21 Cultural business Communities organizations organizations 13 Schools, 12 Centers Methods used in organizing the BREAD CONNECTS activities by the Ruse team International Competition Educational Theatre Action – oriented Learning Social Theatre Creative Task Regional Competition Quiz Research - based Learning Re-enactments Exhibitions Activities of the BREAD CONNECTS project 1. “The Power of Bread” discussion 2. “Bread and Traditions” exhibition 3. “Bread Binds Us” culinary competition 4. “Easter Traditions” educational theatre 5. “Bread of the Ethnic Groups” competition 6. “Bread Connects Europe – Create & Bake “Your” Europe!” competition 7. Activities of the High School of Tourism 8. Activities of the Union of Pensioners of Slivo Pole Municipality 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruse and Giurgiu County Council
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of Ruse-Giurgiu Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Cross-border cooperation development .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Cross-border cooperation between Bulgaria and Romania - Ruse district and Giurgiu County ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 17 3.1 Ruse District and Giurgiu County - geographical confines ......................................... 17 3.2 Ruse District and Giurgiu County as part of the Romania - Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Program ................................................................................................... 22 4. CBC Bulgaria and Romania - good practices ....................................................................... 26 4.1 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 1: ‘’Accessibility‘’ .............................. 26 4.2 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 2: ‘’Environment‘’ ............................. 30 4.3 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 3: ‘’Economic and Social Development‘’ .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Best practices
    [Show full text]
  • PAYMENT SCHEME for AESTHETIC and BIODIVERSITY VALUES of RUSENSKI LOM NATURE PARK Author: Maya Bankova-Todorova, WWF DCP Bulgaria
    WORKING TOGETHER TO INSPIRE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS TECHNICAL REPORT PAYMENT SCHEME FOR AESTHETIC AND BIODIVERSITY VALUES OF RUSENSKI LOM NATURE PARK Author: Maya Bankova-Todorova, WWF DCP Bulgaria Co-authors: Yulia Grigorova and Raina Popova, WWF DCP Bulgaria Technical adviser: Julio Tresierra, PhD, independent consultant With the contribution of: Milko Belberov, Tzonka Hristova and Georgi Georgiev, Directorate of Rusenski Lom Nature Park, Mariana Tzvetanova, freelancer, Milan Jousten, Intern, Monia Martini, WWF DCP Romania Graphic design: Boyan Petkov Cover photo: © Veselina Kavrakova Back cover photo: © Alexander Ivanov Published by WWF Bulgaria, Sofia © 2013 WWF Bulgaria. All rights reserved. WWF is one of the world's leading independent environmental organizations with 5 million volunteers and a global network, which operates in more than 100 countries. WWF's team in the Danube-Carpathian region is responsible for leading and implementing WWF's efforts to preserve, restore and sustainably manage the natural values of the Danube-Carpathian ecoregions. The team works across political borders developing model projects, influencing policy, capacity building, raising awareness and seeking solutions to the challenges that the region faces in order to ensure prosperity, sustainability and biodiversity conservation. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be produced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit WWF Bulgaria as the copyright owners. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Output 4.3.2 E-Mobility Strategy
    Output 4.3.2 E-mobility strategy E bike charging station planed, E bike charging station planed, National Park Persina, PP1 - Belene, BG Rusenski Lom Nature Park, PP2 - Ivanovo, BG E bike charging station ; GOLEM Summer lounge at the Danube PP7 - City of Tuttlingen, DE E-bike charging station, Ciocănești fish farm, E-rickshaw, stationed at Triglav Park, PP11 - BSC Kranj, SLO PP10 - WWF, RO The Project LENA - Local Economy and Nature Conservation in the Danube Region is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) and the European Neighborhood Instrument (ENI). List of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Description of project ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Purpose and content of this document .................................................................................................... 8 2. General .................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Overview e-mobility-market ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Europe in general ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The List Below Is Divided in 2 Parts: 1
    The list below is divided in 2 parts: 1. Validated PICs 2. Temporary PICs Please note that all temporary PICs still require to be validated by the Central Validation Team. It is therefore preferable that you first search for your PIC within the validated ones. Last update: 08/08/2008 VALIDATED PICs GEOGRAPHICAL CITY LEGAL NAME PIC CODE AL TIRANA CIVET 2000 SH.P.K 999784239 AL TIRANA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE 999811205 SPITALI UNIVERSITAR I SEMUNDJEVE TE AL TIRANA MUSHKERIVE "SHEFQET NDROQI" 999558035 AL TIRANA UNIVERSITETI POLITEKNIK I TIRANES 999847774 AM YEREVAN CENTER OF IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGIES 999917323 INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS AND AUTOMATION PROBLEMS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC AM YEREVAN OF ARMENIA 999639903 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE AM YEREVAN REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA 999586553 YEREVAN PHYSICS INSTITUTE AFTER A.I. AM YEREVAN ALIKHANYAN 999637672 ADMINISTRACION NACIONAL DE LABORATORIOS E INSTITUTOS DE SALUD DR. AR BUENOS AIRES CARLOS G. MALBRAN 999830217 CAMARA ARGENTINA DE ENERGIAS AR BUENOS AIRES RENOVABLES ASOCIACION 998639445 AR BUENOS AIRES COMISION NACIONAL DE ENERGIA ATOMICA 999431450 CONSEJO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES AR BUENOS AIRES CIENTIFICAS Y TECNICAS 998619754 AR BUENOS AIRES FUNDACION ISALUD 999613616 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AR BUENOS AIRES AGROPECUARIA 999525055 AR BUENOS AIRES INSTITUTO TORCUATO DI TELLA 999551439 AR BUENOS AIRES PALLIUM LATINOAMERICA ASOCIACION CIVIL 998806091 AR BUENOS AIRES PIXART SRL 999681031 SECRETARIA PARA LA TECNOLOGIA, LA AR BUENOS AIRES CIENCIA Y LA INNOVACION PRODUCTIVA 999829150 SECRETARIAT OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AR BUENOS AIRES AND INNOVATIVE PRODUCTION 999828762 SOCIEDAD ITALIANA DE BENEFICENCIA EN AR BUENOS AIRES BUENOS AIRES 999444060 AR BUENOS AIRES UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES 999881336 FUNDACION PARA LA LUCHA CONTRA LAS ENFERMEDADES NEUROLOGICAS DE LA AR BUENOS AIRES.
    [Show full text]
  • A G R O S T a T I S T I
    REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Census of Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria in 2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of Agriculture and With the financial support of Food the European Union No 218 – November 2012 2010 2020020052005 Agricultural Census in 2010 RUSE DISTRICT – main results General Characteristics of the district The Ruse District is situated in the North Central A Region and is one of the 28 districts in Bulgaria (level NUTS 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics of EU). The total area of the district is 2 G 803.4 sq. km or 2.5% of the territory of the country. The number of the settlements is 83, administered in 8 municipalities; the towns are 9, and the villages – 74. R According to the population census in 2011 the population in the district is 235 252, or 3.2% of the population in the country. The total utilized agricultural O area (UAA) is 1 688 345.5 dca or 60% of the territory of the district. STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS The number of agricultural holdings in the Ruse District is 7 945 or 2.2% of the holdings in the country. The utilized S agricultural area (UAA) is 1 688 346 dca, allocated in 7 633 holdings. The average UAA for the district is 221.2 dca or 118% above the average for the country – 101.3 dca. The holdings that do not have UAA are 312. In the Ruse Municipality are 16.2% of all holdings in the district, 70 without UAA. The remaining 1 216 holdings work 20.7% of the T UAA in the district with average UAA of 287.9 dca.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Laws Database As the Source (© UNESCO)
    DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). Cultural Heritage Act Promulgated, SG, No. 19/13.03.2009, effective 10.04.2009, amended - Judgment No. 7/29.09.2009 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria - SG No. 80/9.10.2009, amended and supplemented, SG No. 92/20.11.2009, effective 20.11.2009, amended, SG No. 93/24.11.2009, effective 25.12.2009, SG No. 101/28.12.2010, amended and supplemented, SG No. 54/15.07.2011, amended, SG No. 15/21.02.2012, SG No. 38/18.05.2012, effective 1.07.2012, SG No. 45/15.06.2012, effective 1.09.2012, SG No. 77/9.10.2012, amended and supplemented, SG No. 82/26.10.2012, effective 26.11.2012 Text in Bulgarian: Закон за културното наследство Chapter One GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. (1) This Act shall regulate the preservation and protection of the cultural heritage of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2) The State shall provide for the protection of the cultural heritage, regardless of its location. Article 2. (1) The cultural heritage shall include the non-tangible and tangible immovable and movable heritage as an aggregate of cultural values which bear the historical memory and national identity, and have scientific or cultural importance.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Ruse Investment Profile 210X297 EN Web.Pdf
    Ruse Municipality 7000 Ruse, 6 Svoboda Square www.ruse-bg.eu CONTENTS: LOCATION AND CONNECTIVITY . 4 MACROECONOMIC PROFILE . 7 SECTORAL STRUCTURE OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY . 7 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY . 8 INVESTMENTS . 10 SMART SPECIALISATION . .11 EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE . 12 DEMOGRAPHY . 12 EDUCATION . 13 LABOUR MARKET . 16 BUSINESS CONDITIONS . 18 LOCAL TAXES AND FEES . 18 UTILITIES . 21 BUSINESS SUPPORT POLICIES . 23 INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ZONES ON THE TERRITORY OF RUSE MUNICIPALITY . 25 INDUSTRIAL PARK – RUSE . .25 FREE ZONE – RUSE . 26 DANUBE INDUSTRIAL ZONE TEGRA . 27 INDUSTRIAL ZONES . 27 BUSINESS PARK – RUSE . 28 LOGISTICS PARK – BPD RUSE . 29 PORTS . 31 BIG INVESTORS AND EMPLOYERS IN RUSE MUNICIPALITY . 33 INVESTMENTS IN PERSPECTIVE . 34 IT&ICT INDUSTRY . 34 AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY . 34 RUSE AIRPORT . 36 INVESTMENT PROJECT FOR INTERMODAL TERMINAL . 36 ARENA RUSE . 37 CULTURE AND TOURISM . 38 RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT . .39 1 2 We Welcome you to Ruse – the FRee spiRit city! In the last few years, we have implemented key and long-awaited projects, through which we have revived Ruse as a city-leader, an economic and industrial centre in the region! The excellent prerequisites for receiving a good education in combination with the strategic geographic location, the secure business environment and the dynamic growth of sectors with high added value for society change the appearance of Ruse in a tangible way and make it a good place to live! The municipality works actively to provide an attractive city brand and a favourable investment climate through the implementation of an Investment and City Marketing Strategy. Ruse is also one of the two Bulgarian municipalities with its own Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation, which sets new and ambitious long-term goals.
    [Show full text]