DOCSLIB.ORG

A G R O S T a T I S T I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A G R O S T a T I S T I REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA Census of Agricultural Holdings in Bulgaria in 2010 Ministry of Agriculture and Food Ministry of Agriculture and With the financial support of Food the European Union No 218 – November 2012 2010 2020020052005 Agricultural Census in 2010 RUSE DISTRICT – main results General Characteristics of the district The Ruse District is situated in the North Central A Region and is one of the 28 districts in Bulgaria (level NUTS 3 of the common classification of territorial units for statistics of EU). The total area of the district is 2 G 803.4 sq. km or 2.5% of the territory of the country. The number of the settlements is 83, administered in 8 municipalities; the towns are 9, and the villages – 74. R According to the population census in 2011 the population in the district is 235 252, or 3.2% of the population in the country. The total utilized agricultural O area (UAA) is 1 688 345.5 dca or 60% of the territory of the district. STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS The number of agricultural holdings in the Ruse District is 7 945 or 2.2% of the holdings in the country. The utilized S agricultural area (UAA) is 1 688 346 dca, allocated in 7 633 holdings. The average UAA for the district is 221.2 dca or 118% above the average for the country – 101.3 dca. The holdings that do not have UAA are 312. In the Ruse Municipality are 16.2% of all holdings in the district, 70 without UAA. The remaining 1 216 holdings work 20.7% of the T UAA in the district with average UAA of 287.9 dca. 1 102 holdings in the Ivanovo Municipality utilize 15.1% of UAA with average UAA of 231.9 dca. The least number of holdings is situated in the Borovo Municipality – 7.9%, and they own 6.8% of the UAA with an average size of 191.4 dca. The holdings cultivating over 500 dca of UAA are 363 (5%), and A cover 91% (1 535 715 dca) of the UAA in the district. The agricultural holdings that work up to 10 dca are 5 233, or 69% of the holdings with UAA in the district, but they work only 1% (14 857 dca) of the UAA. T Table 1 Distribution of agricultural holdings in the Ruse District according to the size of the UAA by municipalities UAA (dca) I Total ≥ 100.0 and < = 0.0 > 0.0 and < 10.0 ≥ 10.0 and < 20.0 ≥ 20.0 and < 100.0 ≥ 500.0 500.0 Municipality Number Average Number Number Number Number Number UAA Number of UAA UAA UAA UAA UAA of size of of of of of (dca) holdings (dca) (dca) (dca) (dca) (dca) S holdings (dca) holdings holdings holdings holdings holdings BULGARIA 370 222 36 169 647.3 101.3 13 148 248 015 816 280.7 46 944 625 506.8 41 124 1 631 422.8 12 828 2 786 112.8 8 163 30 310 324.2 T Ruse District 7 945 1 688 345.5 221.2 312 5 233 14 856.5 744 9 898.7 898 39 036.2 395 88 838.9 363 1 535 715.2 Borovo 612 115 618.4 191.4 8 519 1 615.7 32 439.6 27 922.6 12 2 428.8 14 110 211.7 Byala 1 137 263 562.3 249.3 80 839 1 532.2 50 651.0 83 4 124.1 45 9 561.1 40 247 693.9 I Vetovo 845 164 826.5 202.2 30 443 1 548.7 131 1 833.3 151 6 064.0 50 10 981.9 40 144 398.6 Dve Mogili 996 199 074.6 201.5 8 785 1 756.0 73 964.6 66 2 526.1 28 6 574.4 36 187 253.5 C Ivanovo 1 150 255 559.1 231.9 48 837 2 575.4 83 1 078.6 75 3 105.2 47 9 691.3 60 239 108.6 Ruse 1 286 350 143.5 287.9 70 710 1 735.3 123 1 623.8 200 9 034.8 102 22 397.9 81 315 351.7 Slivo Pole 1 144 196 292.7 181.2 61 548 1 834.8 200 2 613.9 231 9 782.8 54 13 127.9 50 168 933.3 S Tsenovo 775 143 268.4 186.5 7 552 2 258.4 52 693.9 65 3 476.6 57 14 075.6 42 122 763.9 Results and analyses Distribution of UAA in the Ruse District UAA according to the legal status of the holdings The utilized agricultural area of 1 688 346 dca is allocated into Figure 1 7 633 agricultural holdings located on the territory of Ruse Associations District. The number of the holders that are natural persons is and others Natural Commercial 7 321 and they work 25% of the total UAA with average area of persons companies 5% 58 dca. The commercial companies are 141 and they utilize 27 % 25% of the total UAA. Their average area is 3 218.8 dca. The 27% agricultural cooperatives in the district are 51 with 29% of the UAA. The average UAA of these structures is 9 411.9 dca. 14% Sole of UAA is utilized by 97 sole traders. Their average area is traders 2 484.2 dca. The remaining 5% of UAA are worked by civil 14% associations and other structures (monasteries, schools, institutes, etc.), with an average area 3 854.8 dca. Proprietary to the holdings is 11.9% of the utilised land, and 88.1% is rented. 85% of the Cooperatives utilized land is property of natural persons. 29% CROPS Allocation of UAA by crops Figure 2 The arable land is 1 561 315 dca or 92% of UAA in the district Fruit allocated into 5 645 agricultural holdings. Its relative share represents Others Species 11% 5% of the total arable land in the country. Of UAA, cereals represent 1% Wheat 53%, industrial crops – 35%, fodder plants – 3%, permanent Grassland 34% grassland – 6%, and permanent crops – 1%. Wheat occupies 63% of 6% the area under cereals (34% of UAA), grain maize – 19% of the cereals (10% of UAA), and barley – 18% of the cereals (9% of UAA). Sunflower occupies 83% of the area under industrial crops (29% of UAA). 72% of the holdings with UAA have kitchen gardens. Permanent crops are 25 120 dca with 69% of them under Sunflower Barley fruit species. 29% of the area under fruit species is occupied by 29% hazelnuts, 17% with walnuts, 15% with peaches and nectarines. Grain 9% maize Vineyards are 6 837 dca. 10% LIVESTOCK Farm animals, poultry and bees are bred by 6 552 holdings in the Allocation of livestock units district. Of them, 24% breed cattle, 46% – sheep, 30% – goats, Figure 3 21% – pigs, and 77.5% – poultry. In the Ruse District are bred 14 331 heads of cattle, the average size of the herds being 9 heads. BULGARIA 41% 12% 3% 16% 20% 8% The dairy cows are 7 525. Cattle, sheep and goats are bred mainly Ruse 24% 7% 40% 23% 4% on the holdings of natural persons, 79% of the cattle, 90% of the 2% sheep, and 99.6% of the goats, respectively. On the holdings of commercial companies and sole traders are bred 92.6% of the pigs Cattle Sheep Goats Pigs Poultry Other and 76.6% of the poultry. 1 149 holdings breed 35 670 bee colonies, 98% of them on the holdings of natural persons. Livestock units are standard measuring units which allow for unification of the different categories of animals for the purpose of their comparison. WORKFORCE Number of persons employed in agriculture by gender and age group Figure 4 18 002 persons (seasonal workers excl.) were employed in agricultural holdings in 2010 and they worked 10 780 annual work units (AWU). 14 over 65 years 2 877 1 971 790 or 82% of those employed in agriculture in the district were family labour force.. The non-family labour (employees) accounted for 3 212, from 55 to 64 years 2 641 2 022 forming 18% of those employed in agriculture who worked a total of 3 020 AWU. The seasonal workers worked 95.6 thousand man-days, 2 340 from 45 to 54 years 1 588 which represents 412 AWU. 40% of those employed were women and 60% - men. The pensioners above 64 working in agricultural holdings from 35 to 44 years 1 731 1 021 accounted for 27% of employees while the workers up to 34 were 10%. from 25 to 34 years. 860 495 84% of 7 945 managers of holdings (including natural persons) were men, and 16% were women. The managers worked a total of 4 715 under 24 years 305 151 AWU. 7% of them were aged up to 34 while 37% of them were over Male Female 64 years of age. TYPOLOGY OF AGRICULTURAL HOLDINGS In the Ruse District predominate the holdings with mixed crops and stock-breeding, and with mixed stock-breeding – 23.3% and 20.6%, respectively. More than ¾ of the standard output is formed by the holdings specialized in field crops (52.8%) and in breeding of pigs and poultry (24.7%). 2 MAIN RESULTS Table 2 Numbers of holdings and area with main crops, number of livestock and workforce in the Ruse District BULGARIA Ruse District Agricultural area and crops Holdings Area Holdings Area (number) (dca) (number) (dca) Utilised Agricultural Area 357 074 36 169 647.3 7 633 1 688 345.5 Arable land 250 728 31 249 279.8 5 645 1 561 314.8 Cereals 119 640 17 961 479.9 3 905 902 464.6 - Wheat 49 436 11 497 374.0 1 244 573 056.0 - Barley 19 759 2 523 437.0 756 158 161.3 - Grain maize 68 381 3 151 539.5 3 135 167 310.8 Sunflower 16 873 7 325 024.3 1 058 496 897.4 Fodder plants 75 332 1 061 335.4 2 936 49 966.4 Kitchen gardens 227 930 103 646.5 5 503 2 780.6 Permanent grassland 107 267 3 820 229.9 310 99 129.8 Permanent crops 118 610 996 491.1 3 026 25 120.3 - Vineyards 87 002 523 356.7 2 463 6 836.8 - Fruit species 42 827 455 048.5 772 17 209.6 Apples 19 138 58 509.8 250 1 143.6 Peaches and nectarines 9 369 48 701.7 268 2 646.8 Cherries and sour cherries 10 702 106 319.8 119 1 493.3 Walnuts 2 938 62 212.2 136 3 002.3 Hazelnuts 542 16 468.8 52 4 991.1 BULGARIA Ruse District Types and categories of livestock Holdings Number of Holdings Number of animals* (number) animals* (number) Cattle 95 357 576 339 1 591 14 331 - Cows 86 210 347 291 1 202 7 564 Sheep 91 793 1 415 181 3 026 32 639 Goats 84 582 388 866 1 942 9 975 Pigs 82 265 670 469 1 374 83 482 - Sows 15 235 73 547 367 10 275 Total equidae 92 806 112 632 2 370 2 589 Poultry 185 455 17 491 187 5 080 843 616 - Laying hens and pullets 180 253 7 875 278 4 942 496 746 - Chickens for fattening 19 457 7 564 578 679 276 089 - Ducks 7 907 1 543 763 199 6 841 Bee colonies 23 982 588 694 1 149 35 670 *Except for the bees included in the number of the bee colonies.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Annex REPORT for 2019 UNDER the “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY of the REPUBLIC of BULGAR
    Annex REPORT FOR 2019 UNDER THE “HEALTH CARE” PRIORITY of the NATIONAL ROMA INTEGRATION STRATEGY OF THE REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA 2012 - 2020 Operational objective: A national monitoring progress report has been prepared for implementation of Measure 1.1.2. “Performing obstetric and gynaecological examinations with mobile offices in settlements with compact Roma population”. During the period 01.07—20.11.2019, a total of 2,261 prophylactic medical examinations were carried out with the four mobile gynaecological offices to uninsured persons of Roma origin and to persons with difficult access to medical facilities, as 951 women were diagnosed with diseases. The implementation of the activity for each Regional Health Inspectorate is in accordance with an order of the Minister of Health to carry out not less than 500 examinations with each mobile gynaecological office. Financial resources of BGN 12,500 were allocated for each mobile unit, totalling BGN 50,000 for the four units. During the reporting period, the mobile gynecological offices were divided into four areas: Varna (the city of Varna, the village of Kamenar, the town of Ignatievo, the village of Staro Oryahovo, the village of Sindel, the village of Dubravino, the town of Provadia, the town of Devnya, the town of Suvorovo, the village of Chernevo, the town of Valchi Dol); Silistra (Tutrakan Municipality– the town of Tutrakan, the village of Tsar Samuel, the village of Nova Cherna, the village of Staro Selo, the village of Belitsa, the village of Preslavtsi, the village of Tarnovtsi,
    [Show full text]
  • Public Consultation on the Regulatory and Administrative Framework Affecting Tourism
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Service Industries Tourism Policy Public consultation on the regulatory and administrative framework affecting tourism 1. INTRODUCTION The consultation was carried out between 12 December 2013 and 21 March 2014. The objective was to identify EU, national, regional and local policy initiatives (legislative or not) and administrative practices, where there may still be scope for further reduction of the burden for SMEs, and in particular for micro businesses, as well as for EU tourism destinations, public administrations and tourists visiting EU Member States from within or outside Europe. It equally aimed at identifying good practices and success stories at all administrative levels. It is important to underline that the consultation was not part of the Commission’s formal Regulatory Fitness (REFIT) exercise. Its questions were concerning general regulatory and administrative areas without referring to specific measures or practices. This was necessary in order to be able to incorporate various regulatory and administrative levels (i.e. EU, national, regional and local) in its scope. The consultation pointed out to 12 policy areas, each of which divided in sub-areas. The complete list is provided in Annex 1. For each sub-area, respondents were asked to indicate the nature of the burden (at EU, national, regional and local) picking among the different options (Too costly – Unnecessary - Too restrictive - Too excessive - Too complex - Lacks transparency - Lacks protection – Others). The analysis of the outcome of this consultation is intended to remain factual and to provide general information to the Commission as well as to public and private stakeholders, without any concrete follow-up measure in sight for the time being.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex 2 PES-Bulgaria
    ‘Complementary financing for Environment in the context of Accession - Innovative sources’ National level analysis Country: Bulgaria Authors: Maya Todorova Yuliya Grigorova and Yanka Kazakova August 2007 Citation and disclaimer This report should be quoted as follows: Todorova, M., Grigorova, Y. & Kazakova Y. 2007. Complementary Financing for Environment in the Context of Accession – Innovative Resources: National Report Bulgaria. A project for the European Commission (contract 070201/2006/443879/MAR/E3). WWF Danube Carpathian Programme. 35 pp + Annexes. The contents and views contained in this report are those of the authors, and do not necessarily represent those of the European Commission. WWF is the world largest and most effective conservation organization. The mission of WWF is to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment, and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature, by: conserving the world’s biological diversity, ensuring that the use of the renewable natural resources is sustainable and promoting the reduction of pollution and wasteful consumption. WWF Danube Carpathian Programme (WWF DCP) is responsible for leading and to a significant extent implementing WWF’s efforts to preserve, restore and sustainably manage the natural values of the Danube-Carpathian ecoregions. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CHARACTERISTICS OF THE CASE STUDY AREA......................................... 4 2 SWOT ANALYSIS......................................................................................18 3 DEVELOPMENTS AND
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Bulgaria
    Translation from Bulgarian REPUBLIC OF BULGARIA MINISTRY OF ENVIRONMENT AND WATER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT DECISION No. 6-4/2013 Subject to Article 99 (2) of the Environmental Protection Act (EPA), Article 19 (1) of the Ordinance on the terms and conditions of environmental impact assessment (the EIA Ordinance) and in conjunction with Article 31 of the Biological Diversity Act (BDA) and Article 39 (12), in conjunction with Article 39 (13) of the Ordinance on the terms and conditions of compatibility assessment of plans, programs, projects and investment proposals with the scope and purpose of conservation of protected areas (CA Ordinance), I hereby APPROVE The implementation of the investment proposal for: Extraction of sand and gravel from alluvial deposits in the bed of the Danube River, Kama Section (from 510.5 km to 508.0 km) in the vicinity of the Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Municipality, Ruse Region. Contracting Authority: Gravel and Sand Quarries –Bulgaria EAD, Sofia Registered Office: 6 Poruchik Nedelcho Bonchev Str., Iskar District, 1528 Sofia Short description of the investment proposal: Based on the conducted studies and the sand and gravel deposits in the Kama Section (from 510.5 km to 508.0 km) in the vicinity of the Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Municipality, Gravel and Sand Quarries –Bulgaria EAD, Sofia has coordinated the section for the extraction of aggregates from the bed of the Danube River with the Executive Agency for Exploration and Maintenance of the Danube River (EAEMDR), with the initially specified length of the section from 512.0 km to 508.0 km being reduced to preserve the sand deposits over the “head” of the Kama Island, which could otherwise lead to the need of shifting the fairway from the navigable channel, currently between the Kama Island and the Romanian bank, to the channel between the island and the Bulgarian bank which will result in termination of the permission to extract in the whole section.
    [Show full text]
  • Bread Connects
    Online International Conference Sharing beyond borders – New ways for care, communication and cooperation of older people along the Danube and in Europe in times of COVID-19 10-11h July, 2020, Ulm, Germany Assoc. Prof. Emiliya VELIKOVA, PhD University of Ruse, Bulgaria; DANET e.V., Germany [email protected] Aims to connect countries in the Danube Region by sharing their intangible cultural heritage to foster awareness of some common cultural roots to preserve the traditions and customs, the cultural and historical heritage of the Danube region and to pass them on to the next generations to connect people on an intellectual and on an emotional level. Participants from Germany, Bulgaria, Slovenia, Romania, Croatia, Slovakia, Hungary, Serbia, Ukraine, Bosnia and Hercegovina 14 Unions of Pensioners with 76 Clubs and 13 000 members 12 11 NGO’s Structure of Municipalities 12 Others Associations the cluster of Partners of the University partner of Ruse 32 Local 21 Cultural business Communities organizations organizations 13 Schools, 12 Centers Methods used in organizing the BREAD CONNECTS activities by the Ruse team International Competition Educational Theatre Action – oriented Learning Social Theatre Creative Task Regional Competition Quiz Research - based Learning Re-enactments Exhibitions Activities of the BREAD CONNECTS project 1. “The Power of Bread” discussion 2. “Bread and Traditions” exhibition 3. “Bread Binds Us” culinary competition 4. “Easter Traditions” educational theatre 5. “Bread of the Ethnic Groups” competition 6. “Bread Connects Europe – Create & Bake “Your” Europe!” competition 7. Activities of the High School of Tourism 8. Activities of the Union of Pensioners of Slivo Pole Municipality 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruse and Giurgiu County Council
    Crossing the borders. Studies on cross-border cooperation within the Danube Region Case Study of Ruse-Giurgiu Contents 1. Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 2 2. Cross-border cooperation development .............................................................................. 3 2.1 Cross-border cooperation between Bulgaria and Romania - Ruse district and Giurgiu County ................................................................................................................ 3 3. Determination of geographical confines ............................................................................ 17 3.1 Ruse District and Giurgiu County - geographical confines ......................................... 17 3.2 Ruse District and Giurgiu County as part of the Romania - Bulgaria Cross-Border Cooperation Program ................................................................................................... 22 4. CBC Bulgaria and Romania - good practices ....................................................................... 26 4.1 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 1: ‘’Accessibility‘’ .............................. 26 4.2 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 2: ‘’Environment‘’ ............................. 30 4.3 Projects implemented under the Priority Axis 3: ‘’Economic and Social Development‘’ .............................................................................................................. 37 4.4 Best practices
    [Show full text]
  • PAYMENT SCHEME for AESTHETIC and BIODIVERSITY VALUES of RUSENSKI LOM NATURE PARK Author: Maya Bankova-Todorova, WWF DCP Bulgaria
    WORKING TOGETHER TO INSPIRE SUSTAINABLE SOLUTIONS TECHNICAL REPORT PAYMENT SCHEME FOR AESTHETIC AND BIODIVERSITY VALUES OF RUSENSKI LOM NATURE PARK Author: Maya Bankova-Todorova, WWF DCP Bulgaria Co-authors: Yulia Grigorova and Raina Popova, WWF DCP Bulgaria Technical adviser: Julio Tresierra, PhD, independent consultant With the contribution of: Milko Belberov, Tzonka Hristova and Georgi Georgiev, Directorate of Rusenski Lom Nature Park, Mariana Tzvetanova, freelancer, Milan Jousten, Intern, Monia Martini, WWF DCP Romania Graphic design: Boyan Petkov Cover photo: © Veselina Kavrakova Back cover photo: © Alexander Ivanov Published by WWF Bulgaria, Sofia © 2013 WWF Bulgaria. All rights reserved. WWF is one of the world's leading independent environmental organizations with 5 million volunteers and a global network, which operates in more than 100 countries. WWF's team in the Danube-Carpathian region is responsible for leading and implementing WWF's efforts to preserve, restore and sustainably manage the natural values of the Danube-Carpathian ecoregions. The team works across political borders developing model projects, influencing policy, capacity building, raising awareness and seeking solutions to the challenges that the region faces in order to ensure prosperity, sustainability and biodiversity conservation. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be produced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit WWF Bulgaria as the copyright owners. The designations of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of WWF or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Output 4.3.2 E-Mobility Strategy
    Output 4.3.2 E-mobility strategy E bike charging station planed, E bike charging station planed, National Park Persina, PP1 - Belene, BG Rusenski Lom Nature Park, PP2 - Ivanovo, BG E bike charging station ; GOLEM Summer lounge at the Danube PP7 - City of Tuttlingen, DE E-bike charging station, Ciocănești fish farm, E-rickshaw, stationed at Triglav Park, PP11 - BSC Kranj, SLO PP10 - WWF, RO The Project LENA - Local Economy and Nature Conservation in the Danube Region is co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance II (IPA II) and the European Neighborhood Instrument (ENI). List of contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Description of project ............................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Purpose and content of this document .................................................................................................... 8 2. General .................................................................................................................................. 10 2.1 Overview e-mobility-market ................................................................................................................... 10 2.1.1 Europe in general ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The List Below Is Divided in 2 Parts: 1
    The list below is divided in 2 parts: 1. Validated PICs 2. Temporary PICs Please note that all temporary PICs still require to be validated by the Central Validation Team. It is therefore preferable that you first search for your PIC within the validated ones. Last update: 08/08/2008 VALIDATED PICs GEOGRAPHICAL CITY LEGAL NAME PIC CODE AL TIRANA CIVET 2000 SH.P.K 999784239 AL TIRANA MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND SCIENCE 999811205 SPITALI UNIVERSITAR I SEMUNDJEVE TE AL TIRANA MUSHKERIVE "SHEFQET NDROQI" 999558035 AL TIRANA UNIVERSITETI POLITEKNIK I TIRANES 999847774 AM YEREVAN CENTER OF IDEAS AND TECHNOLOGIES 999917323 INSTITUTE FOR INFORMATICS AND AUTOMATION PROBLEMS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE REPUBLIC AM YEREVAN OF ARMENIA 999639903 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE AM YEREVAN REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA 999586553 YEREVAN PHYSICS INSTITUTE AFTER A.I. AM YEREVAN ALIKHANYAN 999637672 ADMINISTRACION NACIONAL DE LABORATORIOS E INSTITUTOS DE SALUD DR. AR BUENOS AIRES CARLOS G. MALBRAN 999830217 CAMARA ARGENTINA DE ENERGIAS AR BUENOS AIRES RENOVABLES ASOCIACION 998639445 AR BUENOS AIRES COMISION NACIONAL DE ENERGIA ATOMICA 999431450 CONSEJO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIONES AR BUENOS AIRES CIENTIFICAS Y TECNICAS 998619754 AR BUENOS AIRES FUNDACION ISALUD 999613616 INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AR BUENOS AIRES AGROPECUARIA 999525055 AR BUENOS AIRES INSTITUTO TORCUATO DI TELLA 999551439 AR BUENOS AIRES PALLIUM LATINOAMERICA ASOCIACION CIVIL 998806091 AR BUENOS AIRES PIXART SRL 999681031 SECRETARIA PARA LA TECNOLOGIA, LA AR BUENOS AIRES CIENCIA Y LA INNOVACION PRODUCTIVA 999829150 SECRETARIAT OF SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AR BUENOS AIRES AND INNOVATIVE PRODUCTION 999828762 SOCIEDAD ITALIANA DE BENEFICENCIA EN AR BUENOS AIRES BUENOS AIRES 999444060 AR BUENOS AIRES UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES 999881336 FUNDACION PARA LA LUCHA CONTRA LAS ENFERMEDADES NEUROLOGICAS DE LA AR BUENOS AIRES.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Heritage Laws Database As the Source (© UNESCO)
    DISCLAIMER: As Member States provide national legislations, hyperlinks and explanatory notes (if any), UNESCO does not guarantee their accuracy, nor their up-dating on this web site, and is not liable for any incorrect information. COPYRIGHT: All rights reserved.This information may be used only for research, educational, legal and non- commercial purposes, with acknowledgement of UNESCO Cultural Heritage Laws Database as the source (© UNESCO). Cultural Heritage Act Promulgated, SG, No. 19/13.03.2009, effective 10.04.2009, amended - Judgment No. 7/29.09.2009 of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Bulgaria - SG No. 80/9.10.2009, amended and supplemented, SG No. 92/20.11.2009, effective 20.11.2009, amended, SG No. 93/24.11.2009, effective 25.12.2009, SG No. 101/28.12.2010, amended and supplemented, SG No. 54/15.07.2011, amended, SG No. 15/21.02.2012, SG No. 38/18.05.2012, effective 1.07.2012, SG No. 45/15.06.2012, effective 1.09.2012, SG No. 77/9.10.2012, amended and supplemented, SG No. 82/26.10.2012, effective 26.11.2012 Text in Bulgarian: Закон за културното наследство Chapter One GENERAL PROVISIONS Article 1. (1) This Act shall regulate the preservation and protection of the cultural heritage of the Republic of Bulgaria. (2) The State shall provide for the protection of the cultural heritage, regardless of its location. Article 2. (1) The cultural heritage shall include the non-tangible and tangible immovable and movable heritage as an aggregate of cultural values which bear the historical memory and national identity, and have scientific or cultural importance.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekotan Eood Assesment of Compatibility of Investment
    EKOTAN EOOD [email protected] mobile: 0889 855 869 mobile: 0889 895 805 Chief University Assistant D. Zahariev, Chief University Assistant N. Kodzabashev, Assistant Professor T. Michev, Prof. M. Stoyneva ASSESMENT OF COMPATIBILITY OF INVESTMENT PROPOSAL on gravel and sand extraction from alluvial sediments in the bed of the Danube River Kama Section (510.5 km. – 508.0 km.) In the area of Pirgovo Village, Ivanovo Munucipality With Natura 2000 sites BGSPA0002024 Mechka fisheries ROSPA0108 Vedea Dunare ROSCI0088 Gura Vedei-Saica-Slobozia September 2012 Ecotan EOOD 1 CONTENTS 1. ANNOTATION OF THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 1.1. Basic technical and technological characteristics of the investment site Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.2. Used raw materials, natural raw materials and resources and energy sources Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.3. Necessity of permits, linked with the investment proposal Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4. Type and quantity of the expected wastes and emissions during the realization of the investment proposal Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.5. Characteristics of water sources and sources for water use for the site Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.6. Quantity and composition of waste water by flows – industrial, domestic and rain water. Treatment facilities Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.7. Closeness to protected territories and protected zones in Bulgaria Error! Bookmark not defined. 2. OTHER PLANS, PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS/INVESTMENT PROPOSALS, EXISTING AND/OR IN PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT OR APPROVAL, WHICH IN COMBINATION WITH THE INVESTMENT PROPOSAL CAN HAVE UNFAVORABLE IMPACT ON THE PROTECTED ZONES IN THE REGION ERROR! BOOKMARK NOT DEFINED. 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Ruse Investment Profile 210X297 EN Web.Pdf
    Ruse Municipality 7000 Ruse, 6 Svoboda Square www.ruse-bg.eu CONTENTS: LOCATION AND CONNECTIVITY . 4 MACROECONOMIC PROFILE . 7 SECTORAL STRUCTURE OF THE LOCAL ECONOMY . 7 ECONOMIC ACTIVITY . 8 INVESTMENTS . 10 SMART SPECIALISATION . .11 EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE . 12 DEMOGRAPHY . 12 EDUCATION . 13 LABOUR MARKET . 16 BUSINESS CONDITIONS . 18 LOCAL TAXES AND FEES . 18 UTILITIES . 21 BUSINESS SUPPORT POLICIES . 23 INDUSTRIAL AND BUSINESS ZONES ON THE TERRITORY OF RUSE MUNICIPALITY . 25 INDUSTRIAL PARK – RUSE . .25 FREE ZONE – RUSE . 26 DANUBE INDUSTRIAL ZONE TEGRA . 27 INDUSTRIAL ZONES . 27 BUSINESS PARK – RUSE . 28 LOGISTICS PARK – BPD RUSE . 29 PORTS . 31 BIG INVESTORS AND EMPLOYERS IN RUSE MUNICIPALITY . 33 INVESTMENTS IN PERSPECTIVE . 34 IT&ICT INDUSTRY . 34 AUTOMOTIVE INDUSTRY . 34 RUSE AIRPORT . 36 INVESTMENT PROJECT FOR INTERMODAL TERMINAL . 36 ARENA RUSE . 37 CULTURE AND TOURISM . 38 RECREATION AND ENTERTAINMENT . .39 1 2 We Welcome you to Ruse – the FRee spiRit city! In the last few years, we have implemented key and long-awaited projects, through which we have revived Ruse as a city-leader, an economic and industrial centre in the region! The excellent prerequisites for receiving a good education in combination with the strategic geographic location, the secure business environment and the dynamic growth of sectors with high added value for society change the appearance of Ruse in a tangible way and make it a good place to live! The municipality works actively to provide an attractive city brand and a favourable investment climate through the implementation of an Investment and City Marketing Strategy. Ruse is also one of the two Bulgarian municipalities with its own Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation, which sets new and ambitious long-term goals.
    [Show full text]