DOCSLIB.ORG

Real Faith and Reason Vol 3

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Real Faith and Reason Vol 3 Real Faith & Reason Absolute Proof of the Bible and the God of the Bible Volume Three Petros B. Scientia Real Reality Books Portage, Wisconsin Copyright © 2015, 2018 by Petros B. Scientia All rights reserved. Please reproduce, distribute, and transmit this book intact in every form and by every means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods. Use quotations as permitted by copyright law. Email this eBook to everyone you love. Use messenger or text. Send out this link: http://RealReality.org/downloads to everyone you know. The use of a quotation doesn’t necessarily imply endorsement of the person or source of the quotation or the information in the quotation. Library of Congress Control Number:2019917815 Publisher’s Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Scientia, Petros B., author. Title: Real Faith & Reason : Absolute Proof of the Bible and the God of the Bible / Petros B. Scientia. Series: The Real Faith & Reason Library Description: [Volumes 1-3] | Poynette, WI: Real Reality Books, 2020 Identifiers: LCCN 2019917815 | ISBN 978-0-9860972-0-1 (vol. 1, color) | 978-0-9860972-1-8 (vol. 1, b+w) | 978-0-9860972-2-5 (vol. 2, color) | 978-0-9860972-4-9 (vol. 2, b+w) | 978-0-9860972-3-2 (vol. 3, color) | 978-0-9860972-5-6 (vol. 3, b+w) Subjects: LCSH God--Proof, Ontological. | God (Christianity). | Theism. | Apologetics. | BISAC RELIGION / Christian Living / Spiritual Growth | SELF-HELP / Spiritual | YOUNG ADULT NONFICTION / Inspirational & Personal Growth Classification: LCC BT102 .S384 2020 | DDC 212--dc23 REAL FAITH & REASON VOLUME THREE TABLE OF CONTENTS Trip 12: God Speaks The Nature of Faith How God Speaks Through the Bible Personal Leading Through His People Through His Creation God Doesn’t Need Human Ideas Through Angels Trip 13: Discerning Truth The Problem Hope Confidence and Boldness Five Necessary Elements for Discernment By Grace through Faith Our Identity Testing Focus Action Trip 14: Warnings about Divine Revelation False Teachings Scripture on False Teaching Detecting Error Trip 15: Arguments of Skeptics Trip 16: Skeptical Arguments to Rationalize Basing Reason on Made- up Stuff Ignore-It Argument Summary-Dismissal Argument Hide-It Argument Ridicule Argument Everybody’s-Doing-It Argument Agreed-On-Premises Argument Best-Interpretation Argument Assumptions-Come-from-Past-Experiences Argument Wisdom-Consists-of-Past-Experiences Argument Sneaky-Christian Argument Multiple-Lines-of-Evidence Argument I-Can-Make-a-True-Statement Argument Pragmatic-Science Argument We-Don’t-Live-Life-that-Way Argument Science-Proves Argument Success-Equals-Sound-Reasoning Argument Inconsistent-Thinking Argument Self-Supporting Argument Defending-Circular-Reasoning Argument Defending-Infinite-Regression Argument Defending-Axioms Argument Axioms-are-Needed Argument Axioms-Are-Self-Evident Argument Misplaced-Credit Argument Right-Assumptions Argument Many-Assumptions Argument Proximate-Knowledge Argument Memorized-Rationalization Argument Rationalism Argument Circular-Proof-of-Human-Reason Argument Last-Word Argument Double-Down-Maneuver Argument Religious-Justification Argument Work-Hard-at-Interpretation Argument Mind-of-Christ Argument Trip 17: Skeptical Arguments against Divine Revelation The Infallible Argument Lost-Contrast Argument Argumentum-Ad-Fidentia Argument False-Dichotomy Argument Other-Gods Argument Prove-It Argument Impossibility-of-Knowing Argument Inconsistent-Revelations Argument You’re-Making-Up-Stuff Argument God-Didn’t-Do-It Argument Absurdity Argument Formal-Logic Argument Weakness-of-the-Human-Mind Argument Coercion Argument Simplistic Argument Circular-Reasoning-Phantom-Fallacy Argument Inflation-of-Conflict Argument Anti-Concreteness-Mindset Argument Phantom-Presupposition Argument Science-Must-be-Ungodly Argument Personal-Conversion Argument Special-Pleading Argument Deceitful-Mind Argument The Open-Minded Argument Christians-Get-It-Wrong Argument Unsatisfactory-Answer Argument Scriptural-Error Argument Ontic-Fallacy Argument Omniscience Argument Vacuous Argument Lofty-Language Argument Autistic-Certainty-Circular Argument You-Could-Be-Wrong Argument Disbelieving-God Argument Double-Down Maneuver Highly-Doubtful Argument Mysticism Argument Tradition Argument No-One-Can-Know-Jesus Argument Bibliolatry Argument Mindlessness Argument The-Mind-is-the-Brain Argument Deism Argument Compartmentalization Argument Theology-is-the-Key Argument Extra-Biblical-Revelation Argument Scripture-Says-there’s-No-More-Revelation Argument Revelation-No-Longer-Happens Argument General-Revelation-Special-Revelation Argument Bible-is-the-Only-Source-of-Revelation Argument Canon-of-Scripture-is-Closed Argument God-Only-Reveals-Through-Scripture Argument Poor-Presentation Argument Demonizing-Divine-Revelation Argument God-No-Longer-Moves-in-Power Argument No-True-Christian Argument Accusing-the-Holy-Spirit Argument Lessons of the Journey What Did You Think of this Book? Acknowledgments About this Book Free Stuff Book Club, Small Group Study or Homeschool Questions The Foundation of Real Faith & Reason Library Further Study Scripture References About the Author This Book is Part of the Real Faith & Reason Library FREE as eBooks The three-volume set of Real Faith & Reason is a journey of spiritual growth and discernment. Real Faith & Reason Volume One Real Faith & Reason Volume Two Real Faith & Reason Volume Three This is a listing of the Bible verses used in Real Faith & Reason. Real Faith & Reason Scripture References Exposing the REAL Creation-Evolution Debate points the way to knowing Christ through the example of a debate between two men over the topic of Creation versus Evolution. (Print version available on Amazon) Exposing the REAL Creation-Evolution Debate The Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies details over 700 fallacies and logic terms with examples. Encyclopedia of Logical Fallacies The Nuts and Bolts of Being Rational goes into the nitty-gritty of the elements of rational thought and how to keep yourself from irrational traps in thinking. The Nuts and Bolts of Being Rational You can download FREE Ebooks in Epub, Mobi, and PDF formats from: http://RealReality.org/downloads/. Trip 12: God Speaks During the trips we took in reason so far in Real Faith & Reason Volume One and Real Faith & Reason Volume Two, we traveled a long way. What a journey it has been so far! Just look at all this truth from the first two volumes: We discovered the importance of truth even though it’s painful whenever truth destroys our current paradigms and preconceptions. If we don’t have the truth, we’re subsisting in a world of illusion and delusion. Unless reasoning BEGINS with truth, reasoning can’t lead to truth. Sound reasoning must always be based on truth. We can’t base reason on untruth or we deceive ourselves regardless of how well the untruth is presented. The more convincingly a persuader presents an untruth, the more hurtful and dangerous the lie. We define sanity as knowing the difference between reality and make-believe. And we define insanity as not being able to tell the difference. Without truth, we can’t tell the difference between truth and error or reality and make- believe. Christ is the Light Who shines His light on everyone whether born again or not born again. His rain falls on the just and the unjust. He reveals reality to anyone who will receive it. Jesus is real and knowable, and everyone who wants to find Christ finds Christ. Whoever sincerely loves truth finds Christ. Those who love deception don’t find Christ. We know that Jesus is real because we know Him. We know that God exists because we know God through Jesus. We know that Jesus is God because Jesus reveals that fact to us. We know that the Bible is true because Jesus reveals that fact to us and He speaks to us through the Bible. Real faith isn’t pretending or making ourselves believe (make-believe). Real faith comes by hearing the utterance (rhema) of God, and Jesus Christ Authors our faith, which is the faith of God. That’s why real faith is substance. It’s reality rather than a concept. And real faith is evidence. It’s absolutely certain proof of what we haven’t yet observed. Without real faith, we can’t be certain of any truth. Therefore, without real faith, there can be no sound reasoning. Jesus directs, instructs, and transforms all who follow Him. We don’t always listen. And our discernment improves as we mature in Christ. However, God knows how to give the Holy Spirit to those who sincerely want the Holy Spirit and who are willing to die to their own fleshly natures. Christ speaks to every person. He speaks through Scripture and every method of divine revelation that He mentions in Scripture. His revelation isn’t any form of made-up stuff. Christ is real and knowable. He knows how to communicate with His created beings. Without knowing Christ and listening to His voice, we have no way to be rational. We desire to grow in Christ to the biblical promise of being transformed into His same image. We grow by grace, which is through faith. God speaks; we hear; faith comes; faith gives us access to grace; grace does the righteousness of God through us; we’re changed in the process. God is asking us to say only His words and to do only His acts. That’s walking in the Spirit. Our part is yielding. To yield is to stop fighting against God, to stop resisting Him. The reason we have to allow God to work His righteousness in us is that God won’t force us. We must be willing. As we submit to the Holy Spirit, we stop resisting Him and we sense that He’s moving within us and through us. In His light, the darkness of the flesh dies to some degree every time we keep in step with the Holy Spirit. Scripture says the Holy Spirit is transfiguring us from glory to glory into the image and likeness of Christ. The biblical pattern of the church is absolutely necessary to complete God’s work of transformation.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 4: INFORMAL FALLACIES I
    Essential Logic Ronald C. Pine Chapter 4: INFORMAL FALLACIES I All effective propaganda must be confined to a few bare necessities and then must be expressed in a few stereotyped formulas. Adolf Hitler Until the habit of thinking is well formed, facing the situation to discover the facts requires an effort. For the mind tends to dislike what is unpleasant and so to sheer off from an adequate notice of that which is especially annoying. John Dewey, How We Think Introduction In everyday speech you may have heard someone refer to a commonly accepted belief as a fallacy. What is usually meant is that the belief is false, although widely accepted. In logic, a fallacy refers to logically weak argument appeal (not a belief or statement) that is widely used and successful. Here is our definition: A logical fallacy is an argument that is usually psychologically persuasive but logically weak. By this definition we mean that fallacious arguments work in getting many people to accept conclusions, that they make bad arguments appear good even though a little commonsense reflection will reveal that people ought not to accept the conclusions of these arguments as strongly supported. Although logicians distinguish between formal and informal fallacies, our focus in this chapter and the next one will be on traditional informal fallacies.1 For our purposes, we can think of these fallacies as "informal" because they are most often found in the everyday exchanges of ideas, such as newspaper editorials, letters to the editor, political speeches, advertisements, conversational disagreements between people in social networking sites and Internet discussion boards, and so on.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death Preppers Guide Book the Fine Art of Stating the Obvious
    The Death Preppers Guide Book The Fine Art of Stating the Obvious 1 ©By :Peter-James :Mitchell 20201207 CONTENTS Ponder – 0 - Intro Ponder – 1 - Dissapointment Ponder – 2 – Fool to Phool Ponder – 3 – Star Lore of our Species Ponder – 4 – Astrology = Star Lore Ponder – 5 – Brief Astrology Overview Ponder – 6 – Astrology as a Logic Puzzle Ponder – 7 - Philosophy Ponder – 8 – Separated-ego and Soul Centred Ego Ponder – 9 – Power Corrupts Absolute Power Corrups Absolutely Ponder – 10 – Pretensional Logic Puzzle Game Ponder – 11 – Gender Ponder Ponder – 12 – Psyche and Psychology Ponder – 13 – Pisces Grace Ponder – 14 – Attitude of Grace Ponder – 15 – Phool Astrology Ponder – 16 – Only a Phool Ponder – 17 - Namaste Ponder – 18 – Chiromancy the fine art of Divination Ponder – 19 – Testimony to our arrival to the Age of Aquarius Ponder – 20 – Back to Pisces Ponder – 21 - Kabal Ponder – 22 – Resolution of Conflict Ponder – 23 – For those not familiar with Astrology Ponder – 24 – Only Dead Ponder – 25 – Cannabis Contortions Ponder – 26 – Quantum Language Ponder – 27 – Token Gesture of the Phools Militia 2 ©By :Peter-James :Mitchell 20201207 Ponder – 28 – Courtesy Notice for Public Servants Ponder – 29 – NOTICE-OF-UNDERSTANDING-AND-INTENT-MANDATE-COUNTER-CLAIM-CONDITIONAL-ACCEPTANCE Ponder – 30 – FOR THE QUANTUM NOTICE All Jester Images in this book are from Rumpel the Worldly Fool of Comedy 3 ©By :Peter-James :Mitchell 20201207 Ponder Zero F Hello Everyone! I welcome you all, as fellow members of my jolly big, beautiful, human family... to this Phoolosophy Adventure. This adventure is like a side show of divine and utter madness... exploring totally ridiculous, optimistic notions of where we are at, as a collective body of fellow individuating cells, of an organism we call humanity guided by the star lore of white fella dreaming, the ancient wisdom of Western Astrology and Tarot.
    [Show full text]
  • So You Say: Demonstrated Facts V. Unsupported Assertions
    So You Say: Demonstrated Facts v. Unsupported Assertions Prepared by: Toni Boone, Administrative Law Judge (retired) Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles and W. Michael Gillette, Associate Justice (retired) Oregon Supreme Court Shareholder: Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt Prepared for: 2017 National Association of Hearing Officials Professional Development Conference Copyright © 2017 Ipse Dixit Publications Wilsonville, Oregon So You Say: Demonstrated Facts v. Unsupported Assertions © 2017 Ipse Dixit Publications 2017 National Association of Hearing Officials Professional Development Conference Page 1 So You Say: Demonstrated Facts v. Unsupported Assertions Toni Boone, Administrative Law Judge (retired) W. Michael Gillette, Association Justice, Oregon Supreme Court (retired) I. Burdens of Proof A. “Burden of Proof” Defined: 1. Duty placed upon a party to a civil or criminal action to prove or disprove a disputed fact. 2. “Burden of Proof” is also used as a synonym for “Burden of Persuasion” which is the quantum of proof by which the party with the burden of proof must establish or refute a disputed fact. B. Preponderance of the Evidence Defined: 1. Evidence, as a whole, shows fact to be proved is more probable than not. 2. The existence of the fact at issue is more likely than not. 3. The greater weight of the credible evidence. 4. More evidence or more credible evidence than evidence offered in opposition to it. C. Clear and Convincing Evidence Defined: The existence of a particular fact is highly probable or reasonably certain. This standard may be used in some jurisdictions when the issue is whether a person was guilty of deceit or fraud—a matter that had to be proved at common law by clear and convincing evidence, rather than by a mere preponderance.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 a Great Big List of Fallacies
    Why Brilliant People Believe Nonsense Appendix 1 A Great Big List of Fallacies To avoid falling for the "Intrinsic Value of Senseless Hard Work Fallacy" (see also "Reinventing the Wheel"), I began with Wikipedia's helpful divisions, list, and descriptions as a base (since Wikipedia articles aren't subject to copyright restrictions), but felt free to add new fallacies, and tweak a bit here and there if I felt further explanation was needed. If you don't understand a fallacy from the brief description below, consider Googling the name of the fallacy, or finding an article dedicated to the fallacy in Wikipedia. Consider the list representative rather than exhaustive. Informal fallacies These arguments are fallacious for reasons other than their structure or form (formal = the "form" of the argument). Thus, informal fallacies typically require an examination of the argument's content. • Argument from (personal) incredulity (aka - divine fallacy, appeal to common sense) – I cannot imagine how this could be true, therefore it must be false. • Argument from repetition (argumentum ad nauseam) – signifies that it has been discussed so extensively that nobody cares to discuss it anymore. • Argument from silence (argumentum e silentio) – the conclusion is based on the absence of evidence, rather than the existence of evidence. • Argument to moderation (false compromise, middle ground, fallacy of the mean, argumentum ad temperantiam) – assuming that the compromise between two positions is always correct. • Argumentum verbosium – See proof by verbosity, below. • (Shifting the) burden of proof (see – onus probandi) – I need not prove my claim, you must prove it is false. • Circular reasoning (circulus in demonstrando) – when the reasoner begins with (or assumes) what he or she is trying to end up with; sometimes called assuming the conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Latin Phrases (Full) 1 List of Latin Phrases (Full)
    List of Latin phrases (full) 1 List of Latin phrases (full) This page lists direct English translations of common Latin phrases. Some of the phrases are themselves translations of Greek phrases, as Greek rhetoric and literature reached its peak centuries before that of ancient Rome. This list is a combination of the twenty divided "List of Latin phrases" pages, for users who have no trouble loading large pages and prefer a single page to scroll or search through. The content of the list cannot be edited here, and is kept automatically in sync with the separate lists through the use of transclusion. A B C D E F G H I L M N O P Q R S T U V References A Latin Translation Notes a bene placito from one well Or "at will", "at one's pleasure". This phrase, and its Italian (beneplacito) and Spanish (beneplácito) pleased derivatives, are synonymous with the more common ad libitum (at pleasure). a caelo usque ad from the sky to the Or "from heaven all the way to the center of the earth". In law, can refer to the obsolete cuius est solum centrum center eius est usque ad coelum et ad inferos maxim of property ownership ("for whoever owns the soil, it is theirs up to the sky and down to the depths"). a capite ad calcem from head to heel From top to bottom; all the way through (colloquially "from head to toe"). Equally a pedibus usque ad caput. a contrario from the opposite Equivalent to "on the contrary" or "au contraire".
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Reasoning in Constructing a Persuasive Argument
    THE ROLE OF REASONING IN CONSTRUCTING A PERSUASIVE ARGUMENT RICHARD R. ORSINGER [email protected] http://www.orsinger.com McCurley, Orsinger, McCurley, Nelson & Downing, L.L.P. San Antonio Office: 1717 Tower Life Building San Antonio, Texas 78205 (210) 225-5567 http://www.orsinger.com and Dallas Office: 5950 Sherry Lane, Suite 800 Dallas, Texas 75225 (214) 273-2400 http://www.momnd.com State Bar of Texas 37TH ANNUAL ADVANCED FAMILY LAW COURSE August 1-4, 2011 San Antonio CHAPTER 11 The Role of Reasoning in Constructing a Persuasive Argument Chapter 11 Table of Contents I. THE IMPORTANCE OF PERSUASION.. 1 II. PERSUASION IN ARGUMENTATION.. 1 III. BACKGROUND.. 2 IV. USER’S GUIDE FOR THIS ARTICLE.. 2 V. ARISTOTLE’S THREE COMPONENTS OF A PERSUASIVE SPEECH.. 3 A. ETHOS.. 3 B. PATHOS.. 4 C. LOGOS.. 4 1. Syllogism.. 4 2. Implication.. 4 3. Enthymeme.. 4 (a) Advantages and Disadvantages of Commonplaces... 5 (b) Selection of Commonplaces.. 5 VI. ARGUMENT MODELS (OVERVIEW)... 5 A. LOGIC-BASED ARGUMENTS. 5 1. Deductive Logic.. 5 2. Inductive Logic.. 6 3. Reasoning by Analogy.. 7 B. DEFEASIBLE ARGUMENTS... 7 C. THE TOULMIN ARGUMENTATION MODEL... 7 D. FALLACIOUS ARGUMENTS.. 8 E. ARGUMENTATION SCHEMES.. 8 VII. LOGICAL REASONING (DETAILED ANALYSIS).. 8 A. DEDUCTIVE REASONING.. 8 1. The Categorical Syllogism... 8 a. Graphically Depicting the Simple Categorical Syllogism... 9 b. A Legal Dispute as a Simple Syllogism.. 9 c. Disputed Facts; Disputed Law.. 9 2. The Hypothetical Syllogism... 10 a. The Conditional Syllogism.. 10 b. The Conjunctive Syllogism... 10 c. The Disjunctive Syllogism.. 10 3. The Dilemma.. 10 4.
    [Show full text]
  • 42 Fallacies for Free
    42 FALLACIES Dr. Michael C. LaBossiere For Free Forty Two Fallacies (For Free) By Dr. Michael C. LaBossiere, [email protected] Legal Information This book is copyright 2002‐2010 by Dr. Michael C. LaBossiere. It may be freely distributed for personal or educational use provided that it is not modified and no fee above the normal cost of distribution is charged for it. Fallacies and Arguments In order to understand what a fallacy is, one must understand what an argument is. Very briefly an argument consists of one or more premises and one conclusion. A premise is a statement (a sentence that is either true or false) that is offered in support of the claim being made, which is the conclusion (which is also a sentence that is either true or false). There are two main types of arguments: deductive and inductive. A deductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) complete support for the conclusion. An inductive argument is an argument such that the premises provide (or appear to provide) some degree of support (but less than complete support) for the conclusion. If the premises actually provide the required degree of support for the conclusion, then the argument is a good one. A good deductive argument is known as a valid argument and is such that if all its premises are true, then its conclusion must be true. If all the argument is valid and actually has all true premises, then it is known as a sound argument. If it is invalid or has one or more false premises, it will be unsound.
    [Show full text]
  • Spies in Academic Clothing: the Untold History of MKULTRA and the Counterculture – and How the Intelligence Community Misleads the 99%
    Articles Spies in Academic Clothing: The Untold History of MKULTRA and the Counterculture – And How the Intelligence Community Misleads the 99% May 13, 2015 • 31 Comments Share 0 1 0 Spies in Academic Clothing The Untold History of MKULTRA and the Counterculture – And How the Intelligence Community Misleads the 99% by Jan Irvin May 13, 2015 Articles in this series: 1) R. Gordon Wasson: The Man, the Legend, the Myth. Beginning a New History of Magic Mushrooms, Ethnomycology,and the Psychedelic Revolution. By Jan Irvin, May 13, 2012 2) How Darwin, Huxley, and the Esalen Institute launched the 2012 and psychedelic revolutions – and began one of the largest mind control operations in history. Some brief notes. By Jan Irvin, August 28, 2012 3) Manufacturing the Deadhead: A Product of Social Engineering, by Joe Atwill and Jan Irvin, May 13, 2013 4) Entheogens: What’s in a Name? The Untold History of Psychedelic Spirituality, Social Control, and the CIA, by Jan Irvin, November 11, 2014 5) Spies in Academic Clothing: The Untold History of MKULTRA and the Counterculture – And How the Intelligence Community Misleads the 99%, by Jan Irvin, May 13, 2015 ‘Books differ from all other propaganda media,’ wrote a chief of the CIA’s Covert Action Staff, ‘primarily because one single book can significantly change the reader’s attitude and action to an extent unmatched by the impact of any other single medium [such as to] make books the most important weapon of strategic (long-range) propaganda.’ The CIA’s clandestine books programme was run, according to the same source, with the following aims in mind: ‘Get books published or distributed abroad without revealing any U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Bentham Studies
    Journal of Bentham Studies Article Jeremy Bentham on Organised Religion Peter Lythe1,* How to cite: Lythe, P. ‘Jeremy Bentham on Organised Religion’. Journal of Bentham Studies, 2021, 19(1), pp. 1–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.2045-757X.049. Submission date: 17 December 2020; Acceptance date: 11 March 2021; Publication date: 17 June 2021 Peer Review: This article has been peer reviewed through the journal’s standard double-blind peer-review, where both the reviewers and authors are anonymized during review. Copyright: © 2021, The Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY) 4.0 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited • DOI: https://doi.org/10.14324/111.2045-757X.049. Open Access: Journal of Bentham Studies is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. *Correspondence: [email protected] 1UCL, UK Jeremy Bentham on Organised Religion Peter Lythe Abstract Bentham’s attack on organised religion was principally an attack on the ‘Church-of-Englandist’ ruling few, and, in particular, the ecclesiastical establishment. This article will examine Bentham’s argument that the ecclesiastical establishment fostered and exploited religious belief, as well as the hopes and fears associated with popular religiosity, in the pursuit of ‘sinister interest’. Bentham recognised a senior clergy that extorted enor- mous sums of money from the population, instituted a fraudulent educa- tion system that subjugated the children committed to its charge, and took advantage of the corrupt alliance of Church and state in order to advance and protect its worldly power and riches.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Fallacies
    List of fallacies For specific popular misconceptions, see List of common if>). The following fallacies involve inferences whose misconceptions. correctness is not guaranteed by the behavior of those log- ical connectives, and hence, which are not logically guar- A fallacy is an incorrect argument in logic and rhetoric anteed to yield true conclusions. Types of propositional fallacies: which undermines an argument’s logical validity or more generally an argument’s logical soundness. Fallacies are either formal fallacies or informal fallacies. • Affirming a disjunct – concluding that one disjunct of a logical disjunction must be false because the These are commonly used styles of argument in convinc- other disjunct is true; A or B; A, therefore not B.[8] ing people, where the focus is on communication and re- sults rather than the correctness of the logic, and may be • Affirming the consequent – the antecedent in an in- used whether the point being advanced is correct or not. dicative conditional is claimed to be true because the consequent is true; if A, then B; B, therefore A.[8] 1 Formal fallacies • Denying the antecedent – the consequent in an indicative conditional is claimed to be false because the antecedent is false; if A, then B; not A, therefore Main article: Formal fallacy not B.[8] A formal fallacy is an error in logic that can be seen in the argument’s form.[1] All formal fallacies are specific types 1.2 Quantification fallacies of non sequiturs. A quantification fallacy is an error in logic where the • Appeal to probability – is a statement that takes quantifiers of the premises are in contradiction to the something for granted because it would probably be quantifier of the conclusion.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The Rhetorical Construction of Performance Appraisal: Argument and Persuasion in the Talk of Appraisees and Appraisers JAMAL, WARDA,NAJEEB How to cite: JAMAL, WARDA,NAJEEB (2017) The Rhetorical Construction of Performance Appraisal: Argument and Persuasion in the Talk of Appraisees and Appraisers, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/12289/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk 2 Durham University The Rhetorical Construction of Performance Appraisal: Argument and Persuasion in the Talk of Appraisees and Appraisers A thesis by Warda Najeeb Jamal Submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirement for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Durham University Business School Durham University United Kingdom August, 2017 Abstract In view of the potential for controversy associated with performance appraisal (PA), the study considers it as the object of controversy worthy of rhetorical attention.
    [Show full text]
  • The CIA's Terence Mckenna FOIA Request Response
    URGENT RELEASE: The CIA's Terence McKenna FOIA reque... http://www.gnosticmedia.com/urgent-release-the-cias-terence-... Home Store Donate The Pharmacratic Inquisition, DVD Forum Gallery Reading Links� Contact Search & Hit Enter Media Categories Podcast Trivium Study Podcast Archive Recent Interviews Videos Articles Peace Revolution User Login Username Password Remember Me Log In Register Lost your password Media Archives December 2012 (3) November 2012 (3) October 2012 (5) September 2012 (5) August 2012 (5) July 2012 (3) June 2012 (1) May 2012 (3) 1 of 30 1/6/13 9:16 AM URGENT RELEASE: The CIA's Terence McKenna FOIA reque... http://www.gnosticmedia.com/urgent-release-the-cias-terence-... March 2012 (3) February 2012 (4) January 2012 (5) December 2011 (5) November 2011 (10) October 2011 (4) September 2011 (2) August 2011 (3) July 2011 (8) June 2011 (6) May 2011 (4) April 2011 (4) March 2011 (5) February 2011 (3) January 2011 (8) December 2010 (3) November 2010 (5) October 2010 (5) September 2010 (5) August 2010 (7) July 2010 (7) June 2010 (4) May 2010 (5) April 2010 (4) March 2010 (5) February 2010 (5) January 2010 (6) December 2009 (5) November 2009 (5) October 2009 (4) September 2009 (4) August 2009 (5) June 2009 (3) May 2009 (4) April 2009 (3) March 2009 (6) February 2009 (4) January 2009 (4) December 2008 (4) November 2008 (4) October 2008 (2) March 2008 (1) December 2006 (1) March 2006 (1) November 1999 (2) November 1997 (1) Links GM on YouTube Trivium Education JohnAllegro.org PopUp Fallacies Hemp 4 Fuel Related: Holotropic Breathwork | Peyote Stitch | 2 of 30 1/6/13 9:16 AM URGENT RELEASE: The CIA's Terence McKenna FOIA reque..
    [Show full text]