Third-Winchester-Dri

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Third-Winchester-Dri Battlefield Winchester Driving Tour 1864 Timeline AREA AT WAR Third Battle August 7 Union Gen. Philip H. Sheridan of Winchester assumes command of the Federal Army of the Shenandoah, opposing Confederate Gen. Jubal A. Early’s 1864: The Year of Decision Army of the Valley. For the Shenandoah Valley, the Civil War reached its turning point in 1864, the Valley’s “Year of Decision.” August – Early For nearly three years, the pain and misery of war had visited the Shenandoah as Union and Confederate 3 September Winchester armies marched and fought through the Valley’s fields and villages, with the Confederacy holding a Sheridan and Early alternately 2 advance and retreat in the tenuous grasp on the bountiful land. Finally, after continuous military losses and frustration, Federal Kernstown northern Valley, occasionally leaders determined in 1864 to conquer, occupy or destroy the military forces and provisions of the 6 engaging one another, and reconfiguring their forces, a time Valley once and for all. Spring brought Union frustration with a defeat at New Market in May, Strasburg 1 Front Royal some refer to as “mimic war.” then a victory on the rolling landscape at Piedmont in June. The Confederate high mark 4 5 came when Gen. Jubal Early marched north into Maryland and threatened fortress August 16 Elements of the two armies Washington, causing consternation in the Federal capital. After more losses in meet near Front Royal in the the Shenandoah Valley, desperate Federal leaders turned to a new commander, inconclusive Battle of Guard Hill. Guard Hill 1 Gen. Philip Sheridan. By early fall Sheridan delivered several stinging Berryville 2 defeats, dashing Confederate hopes. Federal forces then embarked September 3 – 4 Third Winchester 3 The armies fight another on a “scorched earth” campaign that burned and Fisher’s Hill 4 inconclusive engagement at laid waste to much of the Valley’s agricultural Tom’s Brook 5 Harrisonburg the Battle of Berryville; Early bounty. After one final attempt to destroy Cedar Creek 6 withdraws behind Opequon Creek. Sheridan’s army, Early met a smashing defeat at McDowell Cedar Creek on October 19, 1864. Thereafter, September 19 the Confederacy had lost control of the Sheridan attacks Early’s divided Staunton army at the Third Battle of Shenandoah Valley. Winchester, winning a victory that sends Early’s army south to VIRGINIA Fisher’s Hill. The Waltz: September 21 – 22 Early’s army is defeated again August and September 1864 at the Battle of Fisher’s Hill and retreats south through the From the time Sheridan assumed command on August 7 through mid-September, the two foes maneuvered about the northern Valley. Valley, probing, deploying, marching, matching and mirroring each other’s moves but rarely fighting. After contacting a Unionist Sept. 23 – Oct. 8 Quaker in Winchester named Rebecca Wright, Sheridan learned that Early had sent a portion of his army east to reinforce Sheridan’s army moves south Gen. Robert E. Lee at Petersburg. Early had also split his army of some 15,000 soldiers to raid and harass the enemy north of all the way to Staunton, then Winchester. This was the opportunity that Sheridan had been awaiting. moves north and embarks on “The Burning,” systematically confiscating or destroying barns, mills, crops, and livestock Battle Summary throughout the central Valley. Early on the morning of September 19, Sheridan’s cavalry divisions crossed the Opequon Creek at three different points—the October 9 Confederate cavalry is routed vanguard of some 39,000 Union soldiers. Behind the cavalry marched three infantry corps advancing through the narrow but at the Battle of Tom’s Brook by direct approach to Winchester along the Berryville Pike and canyon. Sheridan’s plan was to surprise and overwhelm Early’s Union cavalry; the Burning ends. scattered forces with a powerful attack. However, on September 18, Early had realized Sheridan’s intentions and correctly Mid-October assumed that an attack was imminent. He quickly consolidated his forces, just in time for the Federal onslaught. Sheridan’s Federals encamp along the advance through the Berryville Canyon was confused and tangled with men and supply wagons, which gave Early time to meet banks of Cedar Creek, between the Federal attack. Union Gen. Horatio Wright’s VI Corps and Gen. William Emory’s XIX Corps were severely mauled attacking Strasburg and Middletown. across the plain near the Berryville Pike, through the forested First Woods, across the Middle Field, and then on the Second October 19 Woods north of the Pike. Confederate artillery and counter-attacks from Gen. John Gordon’s and Gen. Robert Rodes’ divisions Early attacks Sheridan’s Union stopped the attacks. By mid-afternoon, Federal Gen. George Crook’s Army of West Virginia (VIII Corps), Sheridan’s reserve, army at the Battle of Cedar fell upon Early’s weakened left line from the north forcing it to fold back into Winchester. Simultaneously, two Union cavalry Creek, winning much of the battlefield by early afternoon divisions—6,000 mounted soldiers—attacked along the Valley Pike, engulfing all resistance in their path. The Confederate left before Federals launch a flank collapsed under the tremendous force, causing a panic. Early ordered a retreat which turned into a rout through the streets counterattack that all but destroys Early’s army for the of Winchester. remainder of the war. Shenandoah Valley Battlefields National Historic District Tour Starting Point ~ US 7 crosses Opequon Creek 8 miles east of Winchester There is a pull-off area on the north side of the highway. Exploring the Old C harlestown Rd M Old Ch cC 5 arlestown Rd an 81 n’s Third Battle of Winchester Rd 11 Jo 6 Battlefield rd a Stop 1 ~ Federal army crosses Opequon Creek at n Sp Spout Spring (Sept 19, 1864) 2-9am r i n d g Exit 317 R s Area of the R At this location most of Sheridan’s Army of the Shenandoah crossed Opequon Creek, led n 7 r d u b by Gen. James Wilson’s 3rd Cavalry Division. Following was Wright’s VI Corps, Emory’s l i Third Battle of small XIX Corps of two divisions, and farther back in support was Crook’s corps. Wilson M 11 Winchester began crossing here at 2am, with the infantry filing into Berryville Canyon, and forced the R k 522 e e d e Confederate picket lines back. d R b Cr ud ll 9 n R i M uo (There are Virginia state markers in this area. To the left, south of US 7, is Millbank, a d q 37 s e d o Op house and mill in operation at the time of the battle.) o Martinsburg Pike W Following the tour: Drive west towards Winchester on US 7. Past the entrance of Millbrook Middle Field High School, the road rises. Stop at a safe pull-off along the road near the top of the hill. rnt Rd 8 Bu ry 4 cto Fa 50 West Woods 2 Stop 2 ~ Federal Deployment – 6-9am 11 First 7Woods (Mouth of Berryville Canyon) Exit 315 3 Wilson’s cavalry quickly and easily secured the plains beyond Berryville Canyon and met 10 little resistance. Wright’s VI Corps followed through the canyon but ignored orders to 1 d leave the train of wagons behind. The many wagons soon caused a huge jam in Berryville R y Canyon for Emory’s corps following behind. Sheridan established his Headquarters at le 37 l 12 Va the Eversole farm, just to the south of this location and the road. Realizing the serious- t n a 11 s ness of the traffic jam in the canyon, Sheridan’s famous anger boiled as his army met stiff e Senseny Rd v lea 81 A resistance. Still, he directed the deployment of his army effectively. But by then Confeder- P y e l ate reinforcements were en route—Sheridan lost his opportunity to destroy Early’s army. l de a Gra V Exit 313 On the morning of September 19, Early had only Gen. Stephen Ramseur’s division and ae k r C re small division under Gen. Gabriel Wharton available to meet the Federal juggernaut.Ceda As 50 Early consolidated his scattered forces through the morning, Ramseur’s division deployed Visitor Information a few hundred yards to the west straddling modern-day US 7 and was the only Confeder- d ate force to meet the Union advance from Berryville Canyon. Ramseur’s division stopped R le d Civil War site brochures, lodging and restaurant information, the Federal attack as Union brigades and regiments were thrown back. id M plus group tour information are available at: Following the tour: Continue west on US 7 and pull into the Winchester Mall parking lot on the right, just before the Interstate 81 interchange. 522 Winchester-Frederick County Visitor Center and Civil War Orientation Center Stop 3 ~ Ramseur’s Defense – 6am-12noon (South of West Woods; Junction I-81 & US 7) 1400 S. Pleasant Valley Rd., Winchester - 877-871-1326 In this area of east Winchester, Ramseur’s Confederate division was able to block37 the Federal advance, first Wilson’s cavalry division, and then Wright’s VI Corps. The Open daily - 9:00am to 5:00pm situation was desperate on both sides: Federal forces were stacking up in the canyon and being slaughtered as they reached the plain out of the mouth of the canyon; www.visitwinchesterva.com 81 Ramseur’s division was being driven back gradually and needed reinforcements. Eventually Confederate Gen. Rodes’ division arrived and deployed north and to the rear in an area called the West Woods.
Recommended publications
  • United Confederate Veterans Association Records
    UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS (Mss. 1357) Inventory Compiled by Luana Henderson 1996 Louisiana and Lower Mississippi Valley Collections Special Collections, Hill Memorial Library Louisiana State University Libraries Baton Rouge, Louisiana Revised 2009 UNITED CONFEDERATE VETERANS ASSOCIATION RECORDS Mss. 1357 1861-1944 Special Collections, LSU Libraries CONTENTS OF INVENTORY SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 3 BIOGRAPHICAL/HISTORICAL NOTE ...................................................................................... 4 SCOPE AND CONTENT NOTE ................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF SUBGROUPS AND SERIES ......................................................................................... 7 SUBGROUPS AND SERIES DESCRIPTIONS ............................................................................ 8 INDEX TERMS ............................................................................................................................ 13 CONTAINER LIST ...................................................................................................................... 15 APPENDIX A ............................................................................................................................... 22 APPENDIX B .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapel Rural Historic District Other Nameslsite Number: VDHR File No
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "NIA" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property LISTED ON: Historic name: Chapel Rural Historic District Other nameslsite number: VDHR File No. 021-5025 121121201 3 Name of related multiple property listing: NIA NRHP 02/14/2014 (Enter "NIA" if property is not part of a multiple property listing 2. Location Street & number: Generallv centered along Lord Fairfax Hwy. from Millwood (south) to Harry Byrd Hw. (north); from Salem Church Rd. (west) to Chilly Hollow Rd. (east City or town: Millwood, Boyce, Berryville State: Virginia County: Clarke Not For Publication: /N/A Vicinity: 3. StatelFederal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination -request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property X meets -does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national -statewide X local Glicable National Register Criteria: 1 Virginia Department of Historic Resources I 1 State or Federal agencylbureau or Tribal Government I In my opinion, the property -meets -does not meet the National Register criteria.
    [Show full text]
  • Music and the American Civil War
    “LIBERTY’S GREAT AUXILIARY”: MUSIC AND THE AMERICAN CIVIL WAR by CHRISTIAN MCWHIRTER A DISSERTATION Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History in the Graduate School of The University of Alabama TUSCALOOSA, ALABAMA 2009 Copyright Christian McWhirter 2009 ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ABSTRACT Music was almost omnipresent during the American Civil War. Soldiers, civilians, and slaves listened to and performed popular songs almost constantly. The heightened political and emotional climate of the war created a need for Americans to express themselves in a variety of ways, and music was one of the best. It did not require a high level of literacy and it could be performed in groups to ensure that the ideas embedded in each song immediately reached a large audience. Previous studies of Civil War music have focused on the music itself. Historians and musicologists have examined the types of songs published during the war and considered how they reflected the popular mood of northerners and southerners. This study utilizes the letters, diaries, memoirs, and newspapers of the 1860s to delve deeper and determine what roles music played in Civil War America. This study begins by examining the explosion of professional and amateur music that accompanied the onset of the Civil War. Of the songs produced by this explosion, the most popular and resonant were those that addressed the political causes of the war and were adopted as the rallying cries of northerners and southerners. All classes of Americans used songs in a variety of ways, and this study specifically examines the role of music on the home-front, in the armies, and among African Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Appomattox Court House Is on the Crest of a 770-Foot High Ridge
    NFS Form 1MOO OWB No. 1024-O01S United States Department of the Interior National Park Service I 9 /98g National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations of eligibility for individual properties or districts. See instructions in Guidelines for Completing National Register Forms (National Register Bulletin 16). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the requested information. If an item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, styles, materials, and areas of significance, enter only the categories and subcategories listed in the instructions. For additional space use continuation sheets (Form 10-900a). Type all entries. 1. Name of Property historic name APPnMATTnY rnriPT unn^F other names/site number APPOM ATTnY ^HITBT HHTTC;P MATTDMAT HISTOPICAT. PARK 2. Location , : _ | not for publication street & nurnberAPPOMATTOX COUPT" HOUSE NATIONAL HISTO RICAL PAR city, town APPOMATTOX v| vicinity code " ~ "* state TrrnrrxTTA code CH county APPnMATTnY Q I T_ zip code 2^579 3. Classification Ownership of Property Category of Property Number of Resources within Property a private n building(s) Contributing Noncontributing public-local B district 31 3 buildings 1 1 public-State site Q sites f_xl public-Federal 1 1 structure lit 1 fl structures CH object 1 objects Name of related multiple property listing: Number of contributing resources previously None_________ listed in the National Register 0_____ 4. State/Federal Agency Certification Asjhe designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this Sd nomination I I request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Staff Officers of the Confederate States Army. 1861-1865
    QJurttell itttiuetsity Hibrary Stliaca, xV'cni tUu-k THE JAMES VERNER SCAIFE COLLECTION CIVIL WAR LITERATURE THE GIFT OF JAMES VERNER SCAIFE CLASS OF 1889 1919 Cornell University Library E545 .U58 List of staff officers of the Confederat 3 1924 030 921 096 olin The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030921096 LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE STATES ARMY 1861-1865. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE. 1891. LIST OF STAFF OFFICERS OF THE CONFEDERATE ARMY. Abercrombie, R. S., lieut., A. D. C. to Gen. J. H. Olanton, November 16, 1863. Abercrombie, Wiley, lieut., A. D. C. to Brig. Gen. S. G. French, August 11, 1864. Abernathy, John T., special volunteer commissary in department com- manded by Brig. Gen. G. J. Pillow, November 22, 1861. Abrams, W. D., capt., I. F. T. to Lieut. Gen. Lee, June 11, 1864. Adair, Walter T., surg. 2d Cherokee Begt., staff of Col. Wm. P. Adair. Adams, , lieut., to Gen. Gauo, 1862. Adams, B. C, capt., A. G. S., April 27, 1862; maj., 0. S., staff General Bodes, July, 1863 ; ordered to report to Lieut. Col. R. G. Cole, June 15, 1864. Adams, C, lieut., O. O. to Gen. R. V. Richardson, March, 1864. Adams, Carter, maj., C. S., staff Gen. Bryan Grimes, 1865. Adams, Charles W., col., A. I. G. to Maj. Gen. T. C. Hiudman, Octo- ber 6, 1862, to March 4, 1863. Adams, James M., capt., A.
    [Show full text]
  • James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg
    “Such a night is seldom experienced…” James Longstreet and the Retreat from Gettysburg Karlton Smith, Gettysburg NMP After the repulse of Lt. Gen. James Longstreet’s Assault on July 3, 1863, Gen. Robert E. Lee, commanding the Army of Northern Virginia, knew that the only option left for him at Gettysburg was to try to disengage from his lines and return with his army to Virginia. Longstreet, commander of the army’s First Corps and Lee’s chief lieutenant, would play a significant role in this retrograde movement. As a preliminary to the general withdrawal, Longstreet decided to pull his troops back from the forward positions gained during the fighting on July 2. Lt. Col. G. Moxley Sorrel, Longstreet’s adjutant general, delivered the necessary orders to Maj. Gen. Lafayette McLaws, commanding one of Longstreet’s divisions. Sorrel offered to carry the order to Brig. Gen. Evander M. Law, commanding John B. Hood’s division, on McLaws’s right. McLaws raised objections to this order. He felt that his advanced position was important and “had been won after a deadly struggle; that the order was given no doubt because of [George] Pickett’s repulse, but as there was no pursuit there was no necessity of it.” Sorrel interrupted saying: “General, there is no discretion allowed, the order is for you to retire at once.” Gen. James Longstreet, C.S.A. (LOC) As McLaws’s forward line was withdrawing to Warfield and Seminary ridges, the Federal batteries on Little Round Top opened fire, “but by quickening the pace the aim was so disturbed that no damage was done.” McLaws’s line was followed by “clouds of skirmishers” from the Federal Army of the Potomac; however, after reinforcing his own skirmish line they were driven back from the Peach Orchard area.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Discoveries at Pritchard's Hill Cemetery
    Summer 2021 • Newsletter of the KernstownKernstown Battlefi eldeld AssociationAssociation •• PP.O..O. BoxBox 13271327 •• WWinchester,inchester, VVirginiairginia 2260422604 •• wwwwww.kernstownbattle.org.kernstownbattle.org Great Discoveries at Pritchard’s Hill Cemetery With only one headstone visible, it’s always been a guess as to how many graves are in the cemetery on Pritchard’s Hill, and where they are located. On Thursday, April 8th GeoModel, a company from Leesburg, Virginia specializing in Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR), was hired by the KBA Board of Dirctors to survey our cemetery to help us deter- mine the number and exact location of the graves. Matt Turner from GeoModel laid out a grid around the existing cemetery and surveyed the entire area. He located 14 gravesites, Pushing his GPR equipment, Matt Turner of GeoModel all located fairly close together, laid east to west. While we have some idea who is buried surveys the Pritchard cemetery. Susan Baldwin’s head- stone stands in the foreground. in the cemetery we will never know who is buried in which grave. However, now when we give tours we can say with certainty that there are at least 14 graves on the hillside. In addition to the one headstone, marked as the grave of Susan (Pritchard) Baldwin, records show the following individuals are also buried on the hill: Susan’s grandfather, Reese Pritchard Jr. (1710 – 1760); her father, Stephen Pritchard I (1745 – 1819); her brother, Stephen Pritchard II (1776 – 1858); and her sister, Margaret (1772 – 1819). We know at least five other family mem- SUSAN JAMES BALDWIN bers are in the cemetery, including two-year- Third wife and widow of old Margaret, daughter of Samuel and Helen CORNELIUS BALDWIN Pritchard who occupied Brightside during the war.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's Role in the Gettysburg Campaign
    LINCOLN'S ROLE IN THE GETTYSBURG CAMPAIGN By EDWIN B. CODDINGTON* MOST of you need not be reminded that the battle of Gettys- burg was fought on the first three days of July, 1863, just when Grant's siege of Vicksburg was coming to a successful con- clusion. On July 4. even as Lee's and Meade's men lay panting from their exertions on the slopes of Seminary and Cemetery Ridges, the defenders of the mighty fortress on the Mississippi were laying down their arms. Independence Day, 1863, was, for the Union, truly a Glorious Fourth. But the occurrence of these two great victories at almost the same time raised a question then which has persisted up to the present: If the triumph at Vicksburg was decisive, why was not the one at Gettysburg equally so? Lincoln maintained that it should have been, and this paper is concerned with the soundness of his supposition. The Gettysburg Campaign was the direct outcome of the battle of Chancellorsville, which took place the first week in May. There General Robert E. Lee won a victory which, according to the bookmaker's odds, should have belonged to Major General "Fight- ing Joe" Hooker, if only because Hooker's army outnumbered the Confederates two to one and was better equipped. The story of the Chancel'orsville Campaign is too long and complicated to be told here. It is enough to say that Hooker's initial moves sur- prised his opponent, General Lee, but when Lee refused to react to his strategy in the way he anticipated, Hooker lost his nerve and from then on did everything wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • Confederate Forces at the Same Time
    CHICAGO CIVIL WAR ROUNDTABLE SHENANDOAH VALLEY – 1864 Shenandoah Valley Map 1864 CHICAGO CIVIL WAR ROUNDTABLE SHENANDOAH VALLEY – 1864 Page 1 of 83 Table of Contents Shenandoah Valley Map 1864 ...................................................................................................................... 0 Shenandoah 1864 by Jonathan Sebastian .................................................................................................... 3 Lower Shenandoah Valley ............................................................................................................................. 9 Army of the Shenandoah ............................................................................................................................ 10 Army of the Valley....................................................................................................................................... 11 Maps ........................................................................................................................................................... 12 Overview Shenandoah Valley Campaigns May-June 1864 ..................................................................... 12 Battle of New Market Map 1 .................................................................................................................. 13 Battle of New Market Map 2 .................................................................................................................. 14 Battle of New Market Map 3 .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th West Virginia Infantry
    5th West Virginia Infantry Battle and Service History of the 5th West Virginia Infantry, U.S. Volunteers Service and Battle History of the 5th West Virginia Infantry, U.S. Volunteers, from Frederick Dyer's, A Compendium of the War of the Rebellion. Organized at Ceredo, W. Va., September 2, 1861, and mustered in October 18, 1861. Served Unattached, District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, to March, 1862. District of Cumberland, Md., Mountain Department, to April, 1862. Milroy's Independent Brigade, Mountain Department, to June, 1862. Milroy's Independent Brigade, 1st Army Corps, Army of Virginia, to September, 1862. Defenses of Washington, D. C., to October, 1862. District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, Dept. Ohio, to January, 1863. Unattached, District of the Kanawha, West Virginia, to March, 1863. 1st Brigade, 3rd Division, 8th Army Corps, Middle Department, to June, 1863. 1st Brigade, Scammon's Division, Dept. of West Virginia, to December, 1863. 1st Brigade, 3rd Division, West Virginia, to April, 1864. 1st Brigade, 2nd Infantry Division, West Virginia, to November, 1864. SERVICE.-Duty at Ceredo and in the Kanawha Valley, W. Va., to December 10, 1861. Moved to Parkersburg, W. Va., December 10, thence to New Creek, W. Va., February, 1862. Linn Creek, Logan County, February 8. Duty at New Creek till May. Joined Milroy's Brigade May 2. Battle of McDowell May 8. Near Franklin May 10-12 and May 26. Battle of Cross Keys June 8. At Strasburg June 20-July 5. Advance to Luray July 5-11. Moved to Sperryville July 11, thence to Woodville July 22, and duty there till August 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil War Fought for the Union Which Represent 52% of the Sons of Harvard Killed in Action During This Conflict
    Advocates for Harvard ROTC . H CRIMSON UNION ARMY VETERANS Total served Died in service Killed in action Died by disease Harvard College grads 475 73 69 26 Harvard College- non grads 114 22 Harvard Graduate schools 349 22 NA NA Total 938 117 69 26 The above total of Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union included 5 major generals, 3 Brigadier Generals, 6 colonels, 19 LT Colonels and majors, 17 junior officers in the Army, 3 sergeants plus 3 Naval officers, including 2 Medical doctors. 72% of all Harvard alumni who served in the Civil War fought for the Union which represent 52% of the sons of Harvard killed in action during this conflict. As result among Harvard alumni, Union military losses were 10% compared with a 21% casualty rate for the Confederate Army. The battle of Gettysburg (PA) had the highest amount of Harvard alumni serving in the Union Army who were killed in action (i.e. 11), in addition 3 Harvard alumni Confederates also died in this battle. Secondly, seven Crimson warriors made the supreme sacrifice for the Union at Antietam (MD) with 5 more were killed in the battles of Cedar Mountain (VA) and Fredericksburg (VA). As expected, most of the Harvard alumni who died in the service of the Union were born and raised in the Northeastern states (e.g. 74% from Massachusetts). However, 9 Harvard alumni Union casualties were from the Mid West including one from the border state of Missouri. None of these Harvard men were from southern states. The below men who made the supreme sacrifice for their country to preserve the union which also resulted in the abolition of slavery.
    [Show full text]