Analyse Des Macro-Restes Végétaux Du Site Colonial De Ferryland (Terre-Neuve, Canada)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyse Des Macro-Restes Végétaux Du Site Colonial De Ferryland (Terre-Neuve, Canada) MARIE-ANNICK PRÉVOST ANALYSE DES MACRO-RESTES VÉGÉTAUX DU SITE COLONIAL DE FERRYLAND (TERRE-NEUVE, CANADA) Thèse présentée à la Faculté des études supérieures de l’Université Laval dans le cadre du programme de maîtrise en archéologie pour l’obtention du grade de maître ès arts (MA) DÉPARTEMENT D’HISTOIRE FACULTÉ DES LETTRES UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL QUÉBEC 2008 © Marie-Annick Prévost, 2008 Résumé La morue des bancs de Terre-Neuve (Canada) a dès le XVIe siècle attitré les Européens en Amérique, bien que ce ne soit qu’au début du siècle suivant qu’on assiste à l’installation de colonies permanentes, comme celle de Ferryland fondée par les Anglais (1621-1696). L’analyse des macro-restes végétaux (incluant les charbons de bois) prélevés lors des fouilles archéologiques effectuées sur ce site a permis de mieux comprendre les interrelations entre les habitants et leur environnement. Leur alimentation était composée d’une grande variété de fruits sauvages indigènes ainsi que de céréales, de pois, de fines herbes et de fruits séchés d’origine étrangère. On ne sait pas si l’agriculture était surtout pratiquée sur place ou si les denrées étaient principalement importées. Les habitants auraient également utilisé les ressources végétales (bois, branches de conifères, sphaigne) pour la construction et le chauffage. En outre, les activités menées par les habitants auraient pu faciliter l’introduction de nombreuses mauvaises herbes d’origine étrangère. Abstract The rich cod stocks of Newfoundland’s Grand Banks (Canada) attracted Europeans to the Americas from the sixteenth century onwards. However, the establishment of permanent colonies like that of Ferryland, founded by the English (1621-1696), date to the seventeenth century. The analysis of macro botanical remains (including wood charcoal) from this archaeological site shed light on the relationships between settlers and their environment. Their diet included a great variety of native wild berries as well as cereals, peas, herbs and dried fruits of European origin. However, we can not tell if this food grew mostly on or around the site or was imported. Settlers also used other plant resources (wood, conifer twigs, peat moss) for building and heating. Also, the activities of the settlers appear to have facilitated the introduction of many non-native weeds. Remerciements Lorsque j’ai entrepris cette maîtrise en 2003, je ne connaissais strictement rien à l’archéobotanique. Si j’en connais un peu plus aujourd’hui, c’est grâce à de nombreuses personnes qui ont eu la générosité de partager avec moi leurs connaissances. Je souhaite en premier lieu remercier ma directrice de recherche à l’Université Laval, Mme Allison Bain, qui m’a fait confiance avec ce projet et qui a su dénicher pour moi les ressources nécessaires pour le mener à terme. Je tiens également à remercier ma co-directrice de recherche, Mme Najat Bhiry, pour ses commentaires rigoureux et pour m’avoir donné accès aux ressources du Centre d’Études Nordiques de l’Université Laval. C’est à cet endroit que j’ai eu la chance de travailler avec Mme Élisabeth Robert dont la patience et les conseils judicieux furent inestimables pour l’identification des macro-restes végétaux. L’identification n’aurait pas non plus été possible sans l’aide de M. Michael Deal, professeur à la Memorial University of Newfoundland, et de M. Alayn Larouche, du laboratoire de paléophytogéographie et de palynologie de l’Université de Montréal, qui ont réussi à mettre un nom sur des pièces particulièrement difficile à identifier. Quant à l’analyse des charbons de bois, elle est l’œuvre de M. Dominique Marguerie et de Mme Nancy Marcoux de l’Université de Rennes I. J’espère que l’interprétation que j’ai faite de leurs données rend pleinement justice à leur travail. Cette maîtrise m’a également donné le privilège de travailler sur l’extraordinaire site archéologique de Ferryland. MM. James A. Tuck, alors professeur à la Memorial University of Newfoundland, et Barry Gaulton, désormais professeur dans ce même établissement, m’ont fourni toute l’aide nécessaire pour la collecte de mes échantillons. Barry a de plus répondu patiemment à mes nombreuses questions par la suite et je lui en suis très reconnaissante. Je tiens par ailleurs à souligner ici les conseils prodigués généreusement par Mme Catherine Fortin, une grande pionnière de l’archéobotanique au Québec, au sujet de l’échantillonnage et de la flottation. Mon séjour à Terre-Neuve a également été grandement facilité grâce à la collaboration de Mme Cathy Mathias, conservatrice à la Memorial University of Newfoundland. J’en profite pour remercier tout spécialement les gens de la communauté de Ferryland qui m’ont offert un si chaleureux accueil. iv Mes remerciements s’adressent également aux étudiants de premier cycle qui m’ont aidée lors du tri : Mélissa Burns, Véronique Forbes et Michael Long. Merci pour votre patience, votre enthousiasme et vos encouragements. Merci également à Mme Andrée Héroux qui a effectué la numérisation des figures 2-1 et 2-11. Par ailleurs, si je suis en train d’écrire ces lignes, c’est beaucoup grâce à Étienne Taschereau qui a cru en moi. Merci pour tout. Évidemment, la recherche n’existerait pas sans la participation de nombreux organismes qui ont à cœur de subventionner la recherche en archéologie. J’ai notamment eu la chance de bénéficier d’une bourse du Conseil de Recherche en Science Humaines du Canada. Le groupe de recherche en archéométrie, le fond d’enseignement et de recherche de la faculté des Lettres de l’Université Laval et le département d’histoire de l’Université Laval m’ont également fourni les ressources financières nécessaires pour participer à un colloque et pour mener à bien mes recherches sur le terrain. Finalement, je remercie tous les professeurs et tous les employeurs qui m’ont fourni du travail durant mes études. Table des matières RÉSUMÉ ........................................................................................................................................................... I ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................................................II REMERCIEMENTS ..................................................................................................................................... III TABLE DES MATIÈRES............................................................................................................................... V LISTE DES TABLEAUX...............................................................................................................................IX LISTE DES FIGURES .................................................................................................................................... X INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................ 1 DOMAINE DE RECHERCHE................................................................................................................. 1 CONTEXTE À L’ÉTUDE ET PROBLÉMATIQUE.................................................................................... 2 OBJECTIFS ET HYPOTHÈSES DE RECHERCHE................................................................................... 4 Objectifs .................................................................................................................................................... 4 Hypothèses ................................................................................................................................................ 7 SOURCES DE DONNÉES....................................................................................................................... 8 PLAN DU MÉMOIRE ............................................................................................................................ 9 1 ÉTAT DE LA QUESTION................................................................................................................... 12 1.1 L’ARCHÉOBOTANIQUE............................................................................................................... 12 1.1.1 Définition........................................................................................................................................ 12 1.1.2 Historique....................................................................................................................................... 15 1.1.2.1 La pratique européenne ............................................................................................................................15 1.1.2.2 La pratique nord-américaine ....................................................................................................................16 1.1.3. Axes de recherche.......................................................................................................................... 17 1.1.3.1 Reconstitutions paléo-environnementales ................................................................................................17 1.1.3.2 Origines et diffusion de l’agriculture .......................................................................................................18 1.1.3.3 Pratiques agricoles ...................................................................................................................................19 1.1.3.4 Paléonutrition et pratiques alimentaires ...................................................................................................19
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • The Vascular Flora of Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge and False Cape State Park, Virginia
    Medical Research Archives The Vascular Flora of Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge and False Cape State Park, Virginia The Vascular Flora of Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge and False Cape State Park, Virginia Richard Stalter* and Eric E. Lamont ** Department of Biological Sciences, St. John's University, Jamaica, NY 11439 New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY 10458 *Corresponding Author Dr. Richard Stalter ( [email protected] ) Copyright 2015 KEI Journals. All rights reserved. Medical Research Archives The Vascular Flora of Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge and False Cape State Park, Virginia ABSTRACT The vascular flora of Bay National Wildlife Refuge and False Cape State Park, Virginia consists of 602 species within 343 genera and 123 families. Of these 519 are native (86%) while 83 are not native to the region. Thirty two species are listed as rare or endangered in Virginia including two small populations of Bartonia verna at False Cape State Park found nowhere else in the state. Several species with southern affinities reach their northern range limit on the Back Bay region, whereas only two northern taxa, Hudsonia tomentosa and Myrica pensylvania are near their southern limit. Non-native varieties of Phragmites australis are a major component of the natural vegetation and pose a threat to native taxa. Each taxonomic entry in the checklist is accompanied by an annotation which includes the locality and habitat in which each taxon occurs, frequence of occurrence, range extensions, rarity status, and pertinent synonyms. Key words : flora, distribution, biodiversity, Back Bay National Wildlife Refuge, False Cape State Park, Virginia. Copyright 2015 KEI Journals.
    [Show full text]
  • D 1KB LI 1^1
    .« p..^—»«=.».^»,— » ~-pppf^l^J^P^ :d 1KB LI 1^1 c?-/? mlTeraiiir Cakntrar, /(,'/; uiB y:i:Ai!. 19 06-19 7 Vol. II m. :i,(Mjin:«, FJOiAis, and co,, i,n:,, i;i;Ai' L0>'1>0X. XEW YUEK, AN D 1' • - 1907, ^-'V?^'c«-a?or. vw. ~jun^>c<x-.oiEMMueHlBCdaB9 tiB I tyjwmmwpp Large 8vo, C/ofh. pp. xxvi + 606. Price 70/6 net CATALOGUE MANUSCRIPTS Hibrarp of €rinitp College, SDublin TO WHICH IS ADOKD A LIST OF THE FAGEL COLLECTION OF MAPS IN THE SAME LIBRARY COMPILKD BY T. K. ABBOTT, B.D., D.Litt. (librarian) DUBLIN: HODGES, FIGGIS, AND CO., Limited. LONDON : LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO. ['] THE BOOK OF TRINITY COLLEGE, DUBLIN, 1591—1891- Descriptive and Historical Account of the College from its Foundation, with 22 Full-page Plates, and 50 Illustra- tions in the Text, consisting of Views, Plans, and Portraits of Famous Members. CONTENTS. CHAPS. i.-iv. —From the Foundation to the close of the Eighteenth Century. By the Eev. J. P. Mahaffy, d.d. v.— During the Nineteenth Century. By the Eev. J. W. Stubbs, d.d. VI. —The Observatory, Dunsink. By Sir Eobeut Ball, ll.d. VII. —The Library. By the Eev. T. K.Abbott, b.d., litt.d.. Librarian, VIII. —The Early Buildings. By Ulick E. Burke, m.a. IX.—Distinguished Graduates. By "W. M'Neile Dixon, ll.r. X.— The College Plate. By the Eev. J. P. Mahaffy, d.d. XI. —The Botanical Gardens and Herbarium. By E. Perceval Wbioht, M.D. XII. —The University and College Officers, 1892. Ode for the Tercentenary Festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetlands of Delaware
    SE M3ER 985 U.s. - artm nt of h - n erior S ate of D lawa FiSh and Wildlife Service Department of Natural Resourc and Enviro mental Con ra I WETLANDS OF DELAWARE by Ralph W. Tiner, Jr. Regional Wetland Coordinator Habitat Resources U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 5 Newton Corner, MA 02158 SEPTEMBER 1985 Project Officer David L. Hardin Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Wetlands Section State of Delaware 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 Cooperative Publication U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Delaware Department of Natural Region 5 Resources and Environmental Habitat Resources Control One Gateway Center Division of Environmental Control Newton Corner, MA 02158 89 Kings Highway Dover, DE 19903 This report should be cited as follows: Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, National Wetlands Inventory, Newton Corner, MA and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section, Dover, DE. Cooperative Publication. 77 pp. Acknowledgements Many individuals have contributed to the successful completion of the wetlands inventory in Delaware and to the preparation of this report. The Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section contributed funds for wetland mapping and database construction and printed this report. David Hardin served as project officer for this work and offered invaluable assistance throughout the project, especially in coor­ dinating technical review of the draft report and during field investigations. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District also provided funds for map production. William Zinni and Anthony Davis performed wetland photo interpretation and quality control of draft maps, and reviewed portions of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey Has Been
    INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey has been compiled by updating and integrating the catalogs prepared by such authors as Nathaniel Lord Britton (1881 and 1889), Witmer Stone (1911), and Norman Taylor (1915) with such other sources as recently-published local lists, field trip reports of the Torrey Botanical Society and the Philadelphia Botanical Club, the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program’s list of threatened and endangered plants, personal observations in the field and the herbarium, and observations by other competent field botanists. The Check List includes 2,758 species, a botanical diversity that is rather unexpected in a small state like New Jersey. Of these, 1,944 are plants that are (or were) native to the state - still a large number, and one that reflects New Jersey's habitat diversity. The balance are plants that have been introduced from other countries or from other parts of North America. The list could be lengthened by hundreds of species by including non-persistent garden escapes and obscure waifs and ballast plants, many of which have not been seen in New Jersey since the nineteenth century, but it would be misleading to do so. The Check List should include all the plants that are truly native to New Jersey, plus all the introduced species that are naturalized here or for which there are relatively recent records, as well as many introduced plants of very limited occurrence. But no claims are made for the absolute perfection of the list. Plant nomenclature is constantly being revised. Single old species may be split into several new species, or multiple old species may be combined into one.
    [Show full text]
  • Avalon and Maryland: a Comparative Historical Archaeology of the Seventeenth­ Century New World Provinces of the Lords Baltimore (1621-1644)
    AVALON AND MARYLAND: A COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY OF THE SEVENTEENTH­ CENTURY NEW WORLD PROVINCES OF THE LORDS BALTIMORE (1621-1644) by Aaron F. Miller A thesis submitted to the School of Graduate Studies in partial fu lfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Archaeology Memorial University ofNewfoundland February 2013 St. John' s Newfoundland Abstract The Calverts, a seventeenth-century English family headed by the first and second Lords Baltimore left a remarkable colonial legacy in North America. The Lords Baltimore established not one but two colonies in the 1620s and 1630s, the first becoming the Province of A val on in Newfoundland and the second the Province of Maryland. Avalon and Maryland examines the defining aspects of these two colonial ventures in order to better comprehend the history and archaeology of each as well as the differences in the two works and how the experiences at the first influenced the implementation of the second. The individuals who designed and applied those proposals at the two colonies are key to understanding the decisions made. George Calvert's governmental career and economic pursuits propelled his Newfoundland colony but his evolving settlement goals would change the nature of that work and come to define Maryland. His young heir Cecil took on this design and it would prove to be his life ' s work. The appointed leaders of the two colonies also played a crucial role in the on-the-ground decisions and based on George Calvert' s perceived problems at Newfoundland there was a shift from the leadership of military men to a trusted fami ly member at Maryland.
    [Show full text]
  • What Ladies and Gentlemen Ate for Dinner: the Analysis of Faunal Materials Recovered from a Seventeenth-Century High-Status English Household, Ferryland, Newfoundland
    Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-57470-6 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-57470-6 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant a la Bibliotheque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduce, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par telecommunication ou par I'lnternet, preter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des theses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, a des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non­ support microforme, papier, electronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L'auteur conserve la propriete du droit d'auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protege cette these. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la these ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent etre imprimes ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author's permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformement a la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privee, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont ete enleves de thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India
    RESEARCH Vol. 21, Issue 68, 2020 RESEARCH ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik1, Lal Ji Singh1, Ganeshaiah KN2 1Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India 2Dept of Forestry and Environmental Sciences, School of Ecology and Conservation, G.K.V.K, UASB, Bangalore-560065, India Corresponding author: Botanical Survey of India, Andaman & Nicobar Regional Centre, Port Blair-744102, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India Email: [email protected] Article History Received: 01 October 2020 Accepted: 17 November 2020 Published: November 2020 Citation Mudavath Chennakesavulu Naik, Lal Ji Singh, Ganeshaiah KN. Floristic Diversity and Analysis of South Andaman Islands (South Andaman District), Andaman & Nicobar Islands, India. Species, 2020, 21(68), 343-409 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT After 7 years of intensive explorations during 2013-2020 in South Andaman Islands, we recorded a total of 1376 wild and naturalized vascular plant taxa representing 1364 species belonging to 701 genera and 153 families, of which 95% of the taxa are based on primary collections. Of the 319 endemic species of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, 111 species are located in South Andaman Islands and 35 of them strict endemics to this region. 343 Page Key words: Vascular Plant Diversity, Floristic Analysis, Endemcity. © 2020 Discovery Publication. All Rights Reserved. www.discoveryjournals.org OPEN ACCESS RESEARCH ARTICLE 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador
    AD ...;; "" . .. l · ·~·· / . •, \ : 'I I; .... .;.~ \ 'f' Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador Editor in Chief Joseph R. S111llllwood P.C. , D.C .L. , LL.D., D . Litt. Managing Editor Robert D. W Pitt H.A.,M.A. Volume One NEWFOUNDLAND BOOK PUBLISHERS (1967) LIMITED @Newfoundland Book Publishers (I 967) Limited First Edition 1981 Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Encyclopedia of Newfoundland and Labrador Contents: v.l. A-E. ISBN 0-920508-13-8 (set). -ISBN 0-920508-14-6 (v.1) 1. Newfoundland- Dictionaries and encyclopedias. 2. Labrador- Dictionaries and encyclopedias. I. Smallwood, Joseph R., 1900- II. Pitt, Robert D.W. 1953- FC2154.E52 971.8'003'21 C81-095040-5 F1121.4.E52 Front Endpapers: Giacamo GastaJdi Map, originally engraved from a single wood block that was destroyed by fire in 1557. The map shown was later re-engraved on copper with minor changes from the woodcut. Back Endpapers: J.N. Bellin Map, originally published in 1745, was the official French version of the outline of Newfoundland at that time. Published by Newfoundland Book Publishers (1967) Limited St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Cover and Text design by Vivant Studio Limited (Sheila Cotton) Rose Bay, Nova Scotia, Canada The Economy design by Wayne C. Stockwood and David Tuck St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Production co-ordination by B. Dale Russell FitzPatrick St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Typesetting by General Printers Division of Consolidated Graphics Limited Oshawa, Ontario, Canada Typesetting (The Economy) by Collins Graphics Services Limited St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada Printed and bound by John Deyell Company Lindsay, Ontario, Canada All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Newfoundland Plantation in the Seventeenth Century Peter E
    Fish into Wine Fish the newfoundland plantation in the seventeenth century peter e. pope Published for the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, Williamsburg, Virginia, by the University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill and London into Wine The Omohundro © 2004 The University of North Carolina Press Institute of Early All rights reserved Set in Monticello type American History by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Manufactured in the United States of America and Culture is sponsored jointly Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data by the College of Pope, Peter Edward, 1946– Fish into wine : the Newfoundland plantation in the William and Mary seventeenth century / Peter E. Pope. p. cm. and the Colonial Includes bibliographical references and index. isbn 0-8078-2910-2 (alk. paper) — Williamsburg isbn 0-8078-5576-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Newfoundland and Labrador—Social life and customs— Foundation. On 17th century. 2. Newfoundland and Labrador—Economic conditions—17th century. 3. Plantation life—Newfoundland November 15, 1996, and Labrador—History—17th century. 4. Frontier and the Institute adopted pioneer life—Newfoundland and Labrador. 5. English— Newfoundland and Labrador—History—17th century. the present name in 6. Cod fisheries—Newfoundland and Labrador—History— 17th century. 7. Land settlement—Newfoundland and honor of a bequest Labrador—History—17th century. 8. Newfoundland and Labrador—Emigration and immigration—History—17th from Malvern H. century. 9. England—Emigration and immigration— History—17th century. I. Omohundro Institute of Early Omohundro, Jr. American History & Culture. II. Title. f1123.p66 2004 971.8'01—dc22 2004002521 The paper in this book meets the guidelines for permanence and durability of the Committee on Production Guidelines for Book Longevity of the Council on Library Resources.
    [Show full text]
  • A Checklist of Vascular Plants from Scatarie Island, Nova Scotia
    Proceedings of the Nova Scotian Institute of Science (2010) Volume 45, Part 1, pp. 45-68 A CHECKLIST OF VASCULAR PLANTS FROM SCATARIE ISLAND, NOVA SCOTIA JONATHAN FERRIER1*, A. ANDREW M. MACDONALD2 AND BARRY R. TAYLOR1 1Department of Biology St. Francis Xavier University Antigonish, Nova Scotia B2G 2W5 2Department of Biology Cape Breton University Sydney, Nova Scotia B1P 6L2 A vascular plant survey of Scatarie Island, Nova Scotia was conducted from 8 to 11 August 2005. Our expedition gathered 77 vascular plant collections that were deposited in the Saint Francis Xavier (STFX) and Cape Breton University (CBUH) herbaria. A Scatarie Island Vascular Plant Checklist was compiled, combining our survey and three previous vascular plant surveys for a total of 309 species extending the checklist by 15 species. There are now 203 species on the checklist represented by voucher specimens and 106 species not represented by voucher specimens which remain on the list. The island supports a number of plant species that are of special interest because of their rarity in the region, especially those with an arctic or alpine affiliation. Une étude des plantes vasculaires de l’île Scatarie, en Nouvelle-Écosse, a été effectuée du 8 au 11 août 2005. L’expédition a permis de recueillir 77 collections de plantes vasculaires qui ont été déposées dans les herbiers de l’Université Saint Francis Xavier et de la Cape Breton University. Une liste des plantes vasculaires de l’île Scatarie a été dressée, à partir de notre étude et de trois études précédentes menées sur les plantes vasculaires. La liste s’est enrichie de 15 espèces supplémentaires et compte au total 309 espèces.
    [Show full text]
  • Karl Anderson 2009 Plant List INTRODUCTION This Check List Of
    Karl Anderson 2009 Plant List INTRODUCTION This Check List of the Plants of New Jersey has been compiled by updating and integrating the catalogs prepared by such authors as Nathaniel Lord Britton (1881 and 1889), Witmer Stone (1911), and Norman Taylor (1915) with such other sources as recently-published local lists, field trip reports of the Torrey Botanical Society and the Philadelphia Botanical Club, the New Jersey Natural Heritage Program’s list of threatened and endangered plants, personal observations in the field and the herbarium, and observations by other competent field botanists. The Check List includes 2,790 species and hybrids, a botanical diversity that is rather unexpected in a small state like New Jersey. Of these, 1,976 are plants that are (or were) native to the state - still a large number, and one that reflects New Jersey's habitat diversity. The balance are plants that have been introduced from other countries or from other parts of North America. The list could be lengthened by several hundred species by including non-persistent garden escapes and obscure waifs and ballast plants that have not been seen in New Jersey since the nineteenth century, but it would be misleading to do so. The Check List should include all the plants that are truly native to New Jersey, plus all the introduced species that are naturalized here or for which there are relatively recent records, as well as many introduced plants of very limited occurrence. But no claims are made for the absolute perfection of the list. Plant nomenclature is constantly being revised.
    [Show full text]