Space Inventory Instructions

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Space Inventory Instructions STANFORD UNIVERSITY FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS PREPARED BY OFFICE OF COST AND MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS STANFORD, CALIFORNIA 94305 JUNE 2018 COPYRIGHT 2018 BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS STANFORD UNIVERSITY FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents Page Overview • Overview 1 • Certification Process 3 • Deadline 3 • If You Need Help 4 I. Changes/Key Points 5 II. Why Is a Space Inventory Required? • University Tracking of Space 7 • Recovery of Indirect Costs 7 • Other Uses/Users 8 III. Updating the Space Inventory • Update Process 9 • iSpace 10 IV. Coding the Data: Definitions and Guidelines • Occupancy 11 • The Reporting Period 11 • Shared Room Use 12 • Level of Use to Report 12 • Types of Space Codes 13 • Room Type Codes 13 • Function Codes 15 V. Function Code Definitions A. Academic Space 1. Instruction (I) 19 2. Departmental Administration (A) 20 3. Organized Research (R) 21 4. Departmental Research (L) 24 5. Other Institutional Activities (C) 25 6. Patient Care (P) 27 June 2018 Page i STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents (cont.) Page V. Function Code Definitions (cont.) B. Central Support Space 7. General & Administrative (G) 28 8. Sponsored Projects Administration (Q) 29 9. University Libraries (U) 29 10. Operation & Maintenance (M) 30 11. Student Administration & Services (S) 30 C. Auxiliaries, Hospital, and Non-Stanford Entities 12. Auxiliaries, Hospital & non-Stanford Entities (N) 31 13. Residence & Dining Enterprises (D) 32 D. Special Use Space 14. Special Service Facility – VSC (F) 32 15. SLAC (O) 33 E. Inactive or Temporarily Unassignable Space 16. Inactive (E) 33 17. Temporarily Unassignable (X) 34 F. Unassignable Space 18. Unassignable (Z) 34 V. Specific Coding Issues • Academic Departments: Office Space (Room Type Codes 300 - 399) 35 • Academic Departments: Function-Specific Space 35 • Food Facilities in Academic Buildings 35 • Lounge Areas & Departmental Libraries 36 • Fundraising 37 • Service Centers 37 1. Academic 2. Administrative • Entering Multiple Room Type / Department Codes 40 • Global Changes Assistance 41 • Private Use of Space 42 June 2018 Page ii STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS Table of Contents (cont.) Appendices A. Listing of Room Type Codes B. Functional Classifications by University Area C. Guidelines for Documentation D. Sample iSpace Room Detail Report E. Sample Floor Plan F. Sample Certification Report G. Glossary of Terms H. Research Policy Handbook Excerpt on Categories of Sponsored Projects (13.2) and Cost Sharing Definitions (15.2) Reference Documents (available separately) iSpace Reference Manual Research Policy Handbook June 2018 Page iii STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS [This page is intentionally blank.] June 2018 Page iv STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS Overview Overview Stanford University uses the iSpace1 system to track the occupancy and use of all the rooms in Stanford on campus buildings and in off campus buildings leased for Summary use by Stanford organizations. In addition to tracking the academic campus, we upload all the student housing/dining buildings and the Stanford Hospitals & Clinics buildings (due to the overlapping occupancy by the School of Medicine). Every two years Stanford conducts an official Space Inventory to update the database for new space, renovated/re-purposed space, demolished space and department moves around the campus. The inventory is a full census of every room during which each department must review and update the information related to the occupancy and use of their space during the fiscal year. This process is known as “Updating and Certifying the Space Inventory”. The data is of great importance to many groups on campus. Much of the analysis of space is for internal use. For example, the School of Medicine (a formula school) uses the data in their annual budgeting process and in space planning. And, of course, EH&S, PMO, ITS and many others depend on the accuracy of the data in accomplishing their work. Perhaps, most importantly, the data supports negotiations with the Federal Government on the Indirect Cost Rate that is applied to sponsored projects. A large portion of the indirect cost recovered by the University depends on the Space Inventory results. The Cost and Management Analysis group (CMA) utilizes the room level functional use data to allocate building related costs that will impact the recovery of millions of dollars to Stanford University As a department Space Coordinator, the information you provide during this inventory of campus space is an integral part of the process for understanding how our space is being used. Therefore, the accuracy of the coding, as updated by you, is of crucial importance. Feel free to ask questions if anything you read is unclear. This document describes the policies and procedures for coding individual room usage in the Space Inventory. In addition to department occupancy and type of room, we need to know how the room is being used and track that usage with Function Codes. Although not all Function Codes are relevant to all users, everyone should understand which codes apply to your department. If you have any questions about which sections of the Space Inventory Instructions are relevant to your area, please contact CMA (see page 3). The Space Inventory has several steps to be completed by the Space Coordinator: (1) Reviewing and updating the room data (2) Providing for documentation as needed (3) Certifying completion of the inventory 1 Stanford University’s Space Management database system June 2018 Page 1 STANFORD UNIVERSITY - FY 2018 SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS Overview (cont.) Review and All space coding must be reviewed and updated as required. Changes may have Updating occurred in your rooms that affect room coding in iSpace for the current inventory process. See page 10 for a detailed outline of the process. CMA has increased its participation in space coding now and in the future to ensure the highest possible level of accuracy. This participation will differ depending on the type of your department: academic vs. administrative (including auxiliaries and non-Stanford entities). Academic CMA will focus its review of departmental entries primarily on the following items (versus a full census review of each department). 1. Space coded in iSpace2 to Organized Research. 2. PIs with Sponsored research and cost sharing accounts with expenditures as of June 2018. All Departments Prior to the archive of the iSpace data, CMA will perform reviews of the functional coding reported by departments to ensure its appropriateness. Once all updates are made, each department is required to certify per the instructions on page 3. Documentation Sufficient documentation to support the coding of your space must be maintained, primarily for space coded to Organized Research (OR). Documentation is important to support OR functional coding decisions in the event of audit by Internal Audit, external auditors, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA), and/or sponsoring agencies. In FY18 we will document the use of this space as estimated by the responsible PIs through the use of the OR Documentation Form or a PI Email Interview. Written documentation is no longer optional; at a minimum, one OR Doc Form or PI Email is required for each PI with lab space coded to OR. This documentation will assist CMA in its review of each department’s space. And during the IDC proposal DCAA audit, this form will reduce the impact on a department’s faculty and staff by providing written documentation. See Appendix C: Organized Research Documentation for detailed guidance on requirements and forms. 2 Stanford University’s Space Management database system June 2018 Page 2 APPENDIX C STANFORD UNIVERSITY SPACE INVENTORY INSTRUCTIONS GUIDELINES FOR DOCUMENTATION Background The objective of documentation is to allow an independent person to review a department's space and to understand the basis for its coding. Documentation is critical because the space inventory is subject to government and internal audits and often these audits take place many months after the space inventory has been completed and certified. The documentation maintained by each department must be sufficient to allow for this subsequent review. Properly completed forms or PI email assist both your department staff and CMA in responding to the Government auditors from the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) during the audit of the Indirect Cost Rate Proposal by providing standardized, written documentation from the inventory year. Documentation for Space Coded to Organized Research (OR) The primary focus is on non-office space (labs and lab support, etc.) coded to OR; this space requires supporting documentation on the methodology used to determine the functional use(s) coded in iSpace. The best way of determining the functional use in the lab space is from an estimate made by the responsible PI on the activities in the lab. In FY18 we will continue to document the use of lab space as estimated by the responsible PIs through the use of the OR Documentation Form or a PI Email Interview. Written documentation is required—at a minimum, one OR Doc Form or PI Email must be completed for each PI with lab space coded to OR. The documentation should clarify the following: • Which rooms the Primary Investigator (PI) was using. • The PI’s estimated Percentage of Use for each functional activity in the space • What research was done, e.g., “Award #: xxxxx” or "Dr. Smith's NSF grant for…" • If not the PI, the name of other person(s) familiar with how the space was used. • If source other than the PI, how the Functional Use coding was determined. A vital aspect of documentation for OR is identification of the research. You can use Award number(s), Sponsor, Title of research project(s), or other definitive description of the research.
Recommended publications
  • 2013-14 Arts Report (Pdf)
    2013-14 Arts Explosion Rocks Stanford 1 A Private Art Collection Becomes a Stanford Collection 2-3 Curricular Innovation 4-5 Interdisciplinary Dexterity 6-7 Anatomy of an Exhibition 8 Visual Thinkers 9 Renaissance Man 10-11 Festival Jérôme Bel 12 The Next Bing Thing 13 Sound Pioneer 14 Politicians, Producers & Directors 15 Theater Innovators 16 Museums & Performance Organizations 17 Looking Ahead 17 Academic Arts Departments & Programs 18-19 “Arts Explosion Rocks Stanford.” Arts Centers, Institutes & Resources 20-21 Student Arts Groups 22-23 That was the headline of a May 2014 article in the San Francisco Chronicle – and it’s a great descrip- Fashion at Stanford 24 tion of the experience of the arts at Stanford in 2013-14. Honors in the Arts: The Inaugural Year 25 Support for Stanford Arts 26 It was a year of firsts: the first full season in Bing Concert Hall, the first year of two innovative curric- 2013-14 Arts Advisory Council 27 ular programs – ITALIC and Honors in the Arts - and the first year of the new “Creative Expression” Faculty & Staff 27 breadth requirement (see p. 4). Stanford Arts District 28 BING CONCERT HALL’S It was also – perhaps most prominently – a year of planning and breathless anticipation of the opening GUNN ATRIUM of the Anderson Collection at Stanford University, which took place to great fanfare in September 2014. In the midst of it all there were exciting multidisciplinary exhibitions at the Cantor Arts Center, amaz- ing student projects and performances throughout campus, and a host of visits by artists including Carrie Mae Weems, Tony Kushner, and Annie Leibovitz.
    [Show full text]
  • The Stanford Daily an Independent Newspaper
    The Stanford Daily An Independent Newspaper VOLUME 199, NUMBER 36 99th YEAR MONDAY, APRIL 15, 1991 Electronic mail message may be bylaws violation By Howard Libit Staff writer Greek issues Over the weekend, campaign violations seemed to be the theme of the Council of Presidents and addressed in ASSU Senate races. Hearings offi- cer Jason Moore COP debate said the elec- By MirandaDoyle tions commis- Staff writer sion will look into vio- possible Three Council of Presi- lations by Peo- dents slates debated at the pie's Platform Sigma house last candidatesand their supporters of Kappa night, answering questions several election bylaws that ranging from policies revolve around campaigning toward Greek organizations through electronic mail. to the scope ofASSU Senate Students First also complained debate. about the defacing and removing Beth of their fliers. The elec- Morgan, a Students of some First COP said will be held Wednesday and candidate, tion her slate plans to "fight for Thursday. new houses to be built" for Senate candidate Nawwar Kas- senate fraternities and work on giv- rawi, currently a associate, ing the Interfraternity sent messages yesterday morning Council and the Intersoror- to more than 2,000 students via ity Council more input in electronic urging support for mail, decisions concerning frater- the People's Platform COP Rajiv Chandrasekaran — Daily "Stand and Deliver" senate nities and sororities. First lady Barbara Bush was one of many celebrities attending this weekend's opening ceremonies for the Lucile Salter Packard Chil- slate, member ofthe candidates and several special fee MaeLee, a dren's Hospital. She took time out from a tour of the hospital to meet two patients, Joshua Evans, 9, and Shannon Brace, 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Tape Collection ARS.0112
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt8x0nf8dx No online items Guide to the Stanford Tape Collection ARS.0112 Finding aid prepared by Franz Kunst Archive of Recorded Sound Braun Music Center 541 Lasuen Mall Stanford University Stanford, California, 94305-3076 650-723-9312 [email protected] © 2011 The Board of Trustees of Stanford University. All rights reserved. Guide to the Stanford Tape ARS.0112 1 Collection ARS.0112 Descriptive Summary Title: Stanford Tape Collection Dates: 1940-2007 Date (bulk): Bulk, 1960-1980 Collection number: ARS.0112 Repository: Archive of Recorded Sound Collection size: 14 boxes: 317 open reel tapes (37 5" reels ; 200 7" reels ; 80 10.5" reels) ; 5 videocassettes ; 7 video reels ; 1 film (8mm) ; 2 compact discs ; one binder Abstract: Historic music and speech recordings on open reel tape, made on the campus of Stanford University. Language of Material: English Access Open for research; material must be requested at least two business days in advance of intended use. Contact the Archive for assistance. Publication Rights Property rights reside with repository. Publication and reproduction rights reside with the creators or their heirs. To obtain permission to publish or reproduce, please contact the Head Librarian of the Archive of Recorded Sound. Preferred Citation Stanford Tape Collection, ARS-0112. Courtesy of the Stanford Archive of Recorded Sound, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, Calif. Sponsor This finding aid was produced with generous financial support from the National Historical Publications and Records Commission. Scope and Contents The Stanford Tape Collection consists of historic music and speech recordings made on the campus of Stanford University.
    [Show full text]
  • ANNUAL REPORT No. 14
    GENE RAL USE P E RMI T 2000 ANNUAL REPORT No. 14 ST ANFO RD U NIVER SITY COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA PLANNING OFFICE June 2015 STANFORD UNIVERSITY | GENERAL USE PERMIT 2000 | ANNUAL REPORT No. 14 Contents Prologue P-1 Section I: Introduction 1 Glossary of Terms 4 Section II: Development Overview 5 GUP Building Area Cap 5 Other Space Caps 8 Housing 9 Parking 12 Section III: Overview of monitoring During Thirteenth Year 15 GUP Condition A: Building Area 15 GUP Condition B: Framework 15 GUP Condition C: Monitoring, Reporting, and Implementation 15 GUP Condition D: Permitting and Environmental Review 16 GUP Condition E: Academic Building Area Review 16 GUP Condition F: Housing 16 GUP Condition G: Transportation 17 GUP Condition H: Parking 18 GUP Condition I: Parks and Recreation Facilities 18 GUP Condition J: California Tiger Salamander 19 GUP Condition K: Biological Resources 19 GUP Condition L: Visual Resources 19 GUP Condition M: Hazardous Materials 19 GUP Condition N: Geology and Hydrology 20 GUP Condition O: Cultural Resources 20 GUP Condition P: Utilities and Public Services 20 GUP Condition Q: Air Quality 20 GUP Condition R: Noise 20 GUP Condition S: Additional GUP Conditions 20 Section IV: Project Summaries 21 File No. 10447: Manzanita Park Residence Hall 26 File No. 10478: Science Teaching & Learning Center – Old Chemistry Project 27 File No. 10600: Graduate School of Business Residences 28 Section V: Anticipated Future Development 29 Section VI: Other Significant Activities 32 Section VII: Other Information 33 References 35 County of Santa Clara Report Project Manager 35 Stanford University Data Providers 35 Annual Report 14 i June 2015 Annual Report 14 Tables TABLE 1 Annual Report 14 Distribution of GUP-Allowed Academic and Academic Support Development ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliographic Automation of Large Library Operations Using a Time-Sharing System: Phase I
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 049 786 LI 002 759 AUTHOR Epstein, A. H.; And Cthers TITLE Bibliographic Automation of Large Library Operations Using a Time-Sharing System: Phase I. Final Report. INSTITUTION Stanford Univ., Calif. Libraries. SPONS AGENCY Bureau of Libraries and Educational Technology (DHEW/OE), Washington, D. C. BUREAU NO BR-7-1145 PUB DATE Apr 71 GRANT OEG-1-7-071145-4428 NOTE 334p. EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.65 HC-$13.16 DESCRIPTORS *Automation, Information Processing, *Information Retrieval, *Information Systems, Library Cooperation, Library Networks, *Library Research, *Library Technical Prdcesses, an Machine Systems, Time Sharing, University Libraries IDENTIFIERS BALLOTS, Bibliographic Automation Large Library Operations, *Library Automation AESTRACT The first phase of an ongoing library automation project at Stanford University is described. Project BALLOTS (Bibliographic Automation of Large Library Operations Using a Time-Sharing System) seeks to automate the acquisition and cataloging functions of a large library using an on-line time-sharing computer. The main objectives are to control rising technical processing costs and at the same t2me tc provide improved levels of service. Phase I produced a prototype system that operated in the library using typewriter terminals. Data preparation and data control units were established; regular library staff were trained in on-line input and searching. Aiter a nine month period of operation, the entire system was evaluated. The requirements of a production library automation system were then defined. Findings are presented on shared facilities, economy and file integrity, the performance of on-line searching, terminal performance, staff and resource commitments, transferability, and the human aspects of system development.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford Cardinal (4-3 • 2-2 Pac-12) Oregon State Beavers (4-2 • 1-2 Pac-12) October 25, 2014 • 12:30 P.M. (PT) Stanford S
    Athletic Communications • Arrillaga Family Sports Center • 641 Campus Drive • Stanford, Calif. • 94305 • GoStanford.com Senior Assistant Athletic Director • Kurt Svoboda [head coach, support staff] • c. 650.223.5809 • [email protected] • @ksvoboda Assistant Director • Alan George [student-athletes, assistant coaches] • c. 574.340.3977 • [email protected] • @treeSIDjorge Assistant Director • Brett Moore [statistics, credentials, web site] • c. 309.212.6367 • [email protected] • @moorebrett Stanford Cardinal (4-3 • 2-2 Pac-12) Stanford Schedule and Results 4-3 overall • 2-2 Pac-12 Oregon State Beavers (4-2 • 1-2 Pac-12) October 25, 2014 • 12:30 p.m. (PT) Date Opponent Time • Result 8.30 UC Davis [Pac-12 Network] .......................... W, 45-0 Stanford Stadium (50,424) • Stanford, Calif. 9.6 No. 14/14 USC [ABC] .................................. L, 10-13 9.13 Army [Pac-12 Network] ................................ W, 35-0 9.27 at Washington [FOX] ............................... W, 20-13 Television • Live national broadcast on ESPN2 with Bob Wischusen (play-by-play), Matt Millen (analyst) 10.4 at No. 9/8 Notre Dame [NBC] .................... L, 14-17 and Jeannine Edwards (sideline). 10.10 Washington State [ESPN] ......................... W, 34-17 10.18 at No. 17/18 Arizona State [ESPN] ............ L, 10-26 Radio • Live coverage on Stanford’s flagship station – KNBR 1050 AM – with Scott Reiss ’93 (play-by-play), 10.25 Oregon State [ESPN2] ........................... 12:30 p.m. Todd Husak ’00 (analyst) and John Platz ’84 (sideline). The broadcast begins one hour before kickoff with 11.1 at Oregon [FOX] ...................................... 4:30 p.m. the Cardinal Tailgate Show and conclude with the post-game Cardinal Locker Room Report.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016-2017 Directory Map with Index 09292016
    S AN M AT EO DR M R BRYANT ST D A Y L RAMONA ST TASSO ST W E URBAN LN HERMOSA WY O R O U MELVILLE AV D A L L BUILDING GRID Poplar F-5 Oval, The F/G-8 N Y NeuroscienceQUARRY RD 30 Alta Road K-3 Post Office I-8 PAC 12 Plaza E-12 A B Health Center 08 Panama Mall: Housing Assignments Office H-7 Press Building I-7 Papua New Guinea Sculpture Garden I-6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Advanced Medicine Center: ASC, Cancer Center C-5/6 Psychiatry B-8 Rehnquist Courtyard J-9 COWPER Anderson Collection D-8 Puichon G-2 Roble Field (on Roble Field Garage) H-5/6 WAVERLEY ST Hoover Sheraton PALO RD Arrillaga Alumni Center F-10 Recycling Center G-13 Rodin Sculpture Garden E-7/8 N Neuroscience Hoover William R. KELLOGG AV Art Gallery G-9 Red Barn I-2 Serra Grove G-7 SANTA RITA AV L Pavilion Hotel VIA PUEBLO Serra Shriram Center Artist's Studio K-3 Redwood Hall F-5 SEQ Courtyard G-6 BRYANT ST Pavilion Hewlett D Health Center L-1A Automotive Innovation Facility F-2 Rogers: The Bridge Peer Counseling Center J-7 Taylor Grove, Chuck E-11/12 EL CAMINO REAL EVERETT HIGH ST Downtown Grove SERRA MALL R Garage Bioengineering & U Teaching Bambi H-5/6 Science Teaching and Learning Center (Old Chemistry Building) F-7 Terman Site H-6 (see INSET 1 W A O Sequoia Barnum Center I-8/9 Sequoia Hall G-7 Toyon Grove D-10/11 LYTTON AVE Palo Alto Westin Chemical Engineering SpilkerHIGH ST E H Center B Barnes G-2 Serra (589 Capistrano Way) J-7 West Oval Grove F/G-8 RAMONA ST at upper left) L EMERSON ST S A C Hotel Hall Bechtel International Center J-7 SHC-LPCH Steam Plant
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Stanford Football at a Glance
    INTRODUCTION SEASON OUTLOOK COACHING STAFF PROFILES PLAYER 2007 REVIEW 2008 OPPONENTS RECORDS HISTORY UNIVERSITY Introduction 2007 Review History Stanford Football at a Glance ......................................... 26 2007 Final Statistics and Results ................................... 94 Year-By-Year Records .................................................. 148 Future Football Schedules ............................................. 27 Individual Statistics .................................................. 95-97 Coaching Records ........................................................ 149 Media Information .......................................................... 28 Game-By-Game Team & Individual Statistics ........ 98-104 Best Seasons/Bowl Appearances by Coach ................. 149 Bay Area Media Directory .............................................. 29 2007 Pacific-10 Conference Review ........................... 105 Year-By-Year Results ............................................ 150-156 2007 Game Reviews ............................................ 106-111 Records vs. Conferences ............................................. 156 Season Outlook 2007 Team Awards ...................................................... 112 All-Time Series Records .......................................157-160 Season Outlook ........................................................ 32-35 All-Time Records vs. Opponents .................................. 161 Roster/Pronunciation ................................................ 36-37 2008 Opponents
    [Show full text]
  • Hoover Digest
    HOOVER DIGEST RESEARCH + OPINION ON PUBLIC POLICY SUMMER 2020 NO. 3 HOOVER DIGEST SUMMER 2020 NO. 3 | SUMMER 2020 DIGEST HOOVER THE PANDEMIC Recovery: The Long Road Back What’s Next for the Global Economy? Crossroads in US-China Relations A Stress Test for Democracy China Health Care The Economy Foreign Policy Iran Education Law and Justice Land Use and the Environment California Interviews » Amity Shlaes » Clint Eastwood Values History and Culture Hoover Archives THE HOOVER INSTITUTION • STANFORD UNIVERSITY The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace was established at Stanford University in 1919 by Herbert Hoover, a member of Stanford’s pioneer graduating class of 1895 and the thirty-first president of the United States. Created as a library and repository of documents, the Institution approaches its centennial with a dual identity: an active public policy research center and an internationally recognized library and archives. The Institution’s overarching goals are to: » Understand the causes and consequences of economic, political, and social change The Hoover Institution gratefully » Analyze the effects of government actions and public policies acknowledges gifts of support » Use reasoned argument and intellectual rigor to generate ideas that for the Hoover Digest from: nurture the formation of public policy and benefit society Bertha and John Garabedian Charitable Foundation Herbert Hoover’s 1959 statement to the Board of Trustees of Stanford University continues to guide and define the Institution’s mission in the u u u twenty-first century: This Institution supports the Constitution of the United States, The Hoover Institution is supported by donations from individuals, its Bill of Rights, and its method of representative government.
    [Show full text]
  • Stanford University Architectural Collection SC1043
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/kt9g5041mg Online items available Guide to the Stanford University Architectural Collection SC1043 compiled by University Archives staff Department of Special Collections and University Archives October 2010 Green Library 557 Escondido Mall Stanford 94305-6064 [email protected] URL: http://library.stanford.edu/spc Note This encoded finding aid is compliant with Stanford EAD Best Practice Guidelines, Version 1.0. Guide to the Stanford University SC1043 1 Architectural Collection SC1043 Language of Material: English Contributing Institution: Department of Special Collections and University Archives Title: Stanford University Architectural Collection creator: Stanford University Identifier/Call Number: SC1043 Physical Description: 2800 item(s) Date (inclusive): 1889-2015 Abstract: The materials consist of architectural drawings of Stanford University buildings and grounds. Conditions Governing Access The materials are open for research use; materials must be requested at least 48 hours in advance of intended use. Audio-visual materials are not available in original format, and must be reformatted to a digital use copy. Scope and Contents The materials consist of architectural drawings of Stanford University buildings and grounds. Arrangement The materials are arranged by building or drawing name. Conditions Governing Use All requests to reproduce, publish, quote from, or otherwise use collection materials must be submitted in writing to the Head of Special Collections and University Archives, Stanford University Libraries, Stanford, California 94304-6064. Consent is given on behalf of Special Collections as the owner of the physical items and is not intended to include or imply permission from the copyright owner. Such permission must be obtained from the copyright owner, heir(s) or assigns.
    [Show full text]
  • Sidney D. Drell Professional Biography
    Sidney D. Drell Professional Biography Present Position Professor Emeritus, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University (Deputy Director before retiring in 1998) Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution since 1998 Present Activities Member, JASON, The MITRE Corporation Member, Board of Governors, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel Professional and Honorary Societies American Physical Society (Fellow) - President, 1986 National Academy of Sciences American Academy of Arts and Sciences American Philosophical Society Academia Europaea Awards and Honors Prize Fellowship of the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation, November (1984-1989) Ernest Orlando Lawrence Memorial Award (1972) for research in Theoretical Physics (Atomic Energy Commission) University of Illinois Alumni Award for Distinguished Service in Engineering (1973); Alumni Achievement Award (1988) Guggenheim Fellowship, (1961-1962) and (1971-1972) Richtmyer Memorial Lecturer to the American Association of Physics Teachers, San Francisco, California (1978) Leo Szilard Award for Physics in the Public Interest (1980) presented by the American Physical Society Honorary Doctors Degrees: University of Illinois (1981); Tel Aviv University (2001), Weizmann Institute of Science (2001) 1983 Honoree of the Natural Resources Defense Council for work in arms control Lewis M. Terman Professor and Fellow, Stanford University (1979-1984) 1993 Hilliard Roderick Prize of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in Science, Arms Control, and International Security 1994 Woodrow Wilson Award, Princeton University, for “Distinguished Achievement in the Nation's Service” 1994 Co-recipient of the 1989 “Ettore Majorana - Erice - Science for Peace Prize” 1995 John P. McGovern Science and Society Medalist of Sigma Xi 1996 Gian Carlo Wick Commemorative Medal Award, ICSC–World Laboratory 1997 Distinguished Associate Award of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Vice President Biden's Economic Agenda
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION STUDY An Analysis of Vice President Biden’s Economic Agenda: The Long Run Impacts of Its Regulation, Taxes, and Spending* Institution Hoover TIMOTHY FITZGERALD, KEVIN HASSETT, CODY KALLEN, AND CASEY B. MULLIGAN We estimate possible effects of Joe Biden’s tax and regulatory agenda. We find that transportation and electricity will require more inputs to produce the same outputs due to ambitious plans to further cut the nation’s carbon emissions, resulting in one or two percent less total factor productivity nationally. Second, we find that proposed changes to regulation as well as to the ACA increase labor wedges. Third, Biden’s agenda increases average marginal tax rates on capital income. Assuming that the supply of capital is elastic in the long run to its after-tax return and that the substitution effect of wages on labor supply is nontrivial, we conclude that, in the long run, Biden’s full agenda reduces full- time equivalent employment per person by about 3 percent, the capital stock per person by about 15 percent, real GDP per capita by more than 8 percent, and real consumption per household by about 7 percent. I. Introduction Advancing equality, environmental protection and other social goals involves tradeoffs. The purpose of this paper is to quantify possible economic effects of the Biden agenda. Vice President Biden proposes to • reverse some of the 2017 tax cuts as well as increase the taxation of corporations and high-income households and pass through entities; • reverse much of the regulatory reform of the past three years as well as setting new environmental standards; and • create or expand subsidies for, especially, health insurance and renewable energy.
    [Show full text]