DOCSLIB.ORG

Making and Meaning in Ancient Greek

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Making and Meaning in Ancient Greek ARCL0162 UCL, INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ARCL0162 MAKING AND MEANING IN ANCIENT GREEK ART COURSE-HANDBOOK Module coordinator: Dr. Eva Mol [email protected] Office: Room 105. Tel: 0207 679 1525 Online office hours: Weekly Monday morning Chat session 12-1PM, or by appointment Please see the online IoA Student Handbook for instructions on coursework submission, IoA referencing guidelines and marking criteria, as well as UCL policies on penalties for late submission ARCL0162 1. Overview of course Introduction This module is designed to develop in students the skills of careful looking, detailed visual analysis, and critical rethinking of Greek art. The module will be grounded in a strong awareness of the major theoretical and contemporary issues central to research in classical art history. Classical Greek art is an object of study in archaeology since Winckelmann wrote his canonical book ‘Geschichte der Kunst des Altertums’ in 1764. His work has shaped art- history and classical archaeology, and left us with a particular scholarly approach and canon. The past decades this canon and approach has been seriously questioned, and Classical art history is slowly emerging out of traditional scholarship and more in sync with current art historical thinking, engaging with topics such as agency, materiality and globalisation theory. This means we live in exciting times where we need to rethink the body of objects that were deemed ‘the canon of Greek art’, as well as how we study them and this is exactly what this course attempts to do. Together we will study new ways to look at ancient art, this year’s theme will be on: the Other in Greek Art. We will deal with how the ‘other’ (as non-Greek) are depicted in visual culture and how we can study this, or how other cultures have appropriated Greek art. Also on how we can study other viewpoints giving space to different material, spirits, or other scholarly perspectives that can broaden up how we look at Greek art. The Other also resonates in today’s current society and the issues that Greek art have, and a large part of the course will be focused on how, amidst the era of Covid19 and Black Lives Matter, we make Greek art relevant. Module schedule: Seminars will be held online, 2-4pm every Tuesday Week Date topic 1 6-10 Introduction to the course: some key concepts and approaches 2 13-10 Geometric Greek art. Memory, narrative, and the world of Homer 3 20-10 Orient and orientalising: early Greek art and cultural contact 4 27-10 Archaic art, agency, and animism 5 3-11 Rethinking Greek vases I: Context and Sensoriality 10-11 Deadline reflection essay 6 No class Reading week 7 17-11 Winckelmann’s victims: Classical art in the museum and beyond 8 24-11 Rethinking Greek vases II: Making the ‘Other’ in Greek art. 9 1-12 The ideal body and naturalism: gender and sexuality in Greek art 10 8-12 Style, power, and identity in the Hellenistic world 11 15-12 Final discussion and presentations 12-1 Deadline research essay Essay submission deadlines: reflection essay- Nov 10 2020; Research paper -Jan 12, 2021. ARCL0162 Teaching methods: Seminars The seminars will be held each week, and will consist of student presentations, discussion, in-class exercises and discussions on objects and readings. They will focus on new theoretical approaches and debates in Greek art, and their application to case studies. Time in class is used as an opportunity for students to work out their own ideas and accumulate knowledge to be able to read about the topic and research by themselves. Your questions and interests will structure the seminar. Check this page for UCL online etiquette: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/students/academic-support/netiquette-good-online-behaviour-ucl Lectures Very brief 5 to 10-minute lectures introducing the topic discussions will be provided with each seminar and need to be watched beforehand. The links to these can be found on the moodle page. Moodle forum blog posts Discussion will also take place on moodle forum, where students have to submit weekly ‘blog posts’ of 200-150 words reflecting on the readings and engaging with specific questions posted beforehand. Joint reading with Hypothesis.is Occasionally, specific key literature will be integrated as an hypothesis exercise and subsequently used for seminar discussion. Students will read one article together and need to annotate and reflect. When the paper is done by Hypothes.is will be indicated. Chat sessions Additional chat-sessions on moodle of an hour are organised (not compulsory) on Monday morning 12-1PM. These are meant to ask last minute questions on the readings, course material and assignments for the seminar the day after. Workload: There will be 20 hours of seminars for this course. Students will be expected to undertake 80 hours of reading for the course, and 50 hours preparing for and producing the assessed module work. This adds up to a total workload of 150 hours for the course. 20 hours Staff-led teaching sessions (lectures, seminars, tutorials, discussion-board sessions) 80 hours Self-guided session preparation (reading, listening, note-taking and online activities), about 8 hours a week 10 hours Reading for, and writing, object essay 40 hours Reading for, and writing, the research essay Prerequisites: It is really important that students have a basic background in classical (Greco-Roman) art, the goal of the class is to rethink Greek art, so students need to be aware of basic literature, the ‘canon’, periodization, and stylistic categories. To brush up your knowledge, you are advised to read Richard Neer’s Greek Art and Architecture, for each session the appropriate background material will be provided. Students without the right background may take the course, subject to consultation with the module coordinator. ARCL0162 Communications: Moodle is the main hub for this course. Important information will be posted in the Announcements section of the Moodle page and you will automatically receive an email notification for these. Weekly chat session on moodle will take place during the course to ask about course content, Monday 12-1 PM For personal queries or making an appointment, please contact the co-ordinator by email. [email protected] For tips on writing, policies and other coursework related subjects consult https://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/current-students. The IoA: https://www.ucl.ac.uk/archaeology/current-students/ioa-student-handbook 2. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT Aims: To provide a seminar for the study of Greek art at an advanced level, preparing students to develop dissertation research at MA level and beyond. To provide an advanced level exploration of classic and contemporary theoretical frameworks and methodologies for the understanding of Greek art. To provide a basis in skills of problem definition and visual analysis prerequisite to developing innovative research in Greek art. To address a range of key problems in the history of Greek art through close engagement with online collections and connection to current societal issues. Objectives: Students will develop and advanced critical understanding of a range of key issues in the history and historiography of Greek Art. They will develop an active mastery of key theoretical frameworks and methods of analysis in contemporary approaches to the history of Greek art. They will develop key skills of close looking and detailed visual analysis through first hand engagement with objects from the collections of London museums. They will acquire the ability to identify significant research problems in the history of Greek art, as a preparation for developing their own independent research projects. Outcomes Students will: 1) Be able to demonstrate a good understanding of the key principles which inform the systematic and critical visual analysis of works of art 2) Be able to demonstrate a good understanding of key classical and contemporary theoretical and methodological frameworks for the understanding of Greek art 3) Be able critically to evaluate existing research in Greek art, and identify ways in which a range of research programmes might be taken forward 4) Be familiar with the range of visual, textual and archaeological sources relevant to the understanding of Greek art 5) Be able to understand and appreciate the range of problems involved in the interpretation of complex, ambiguous and often incomplete data. ARCL0162 Assignments&Assessments: The module contains weekly assignments for all students synchronous and asynchronous. Asynchronous: watching lectures, weekly readings, posting on the moodle forum and occasional hypothes.is reading. This is meant to engage with the literature individually and as a group, but also to make the seminars more fun, and stimulate your own critical thinking. Synchronous: weekly seminars in which we discuss the readings and the forum posts, one student presentation, and a variety of objects. The assessed coursework, consists of two essays: a smaller reflection essay (1000 words 25%) and a research essay of 3000 words (75%). Non-assessed coursework Readings There will be 2-3 readings a week and background reading, the number is kept low because I want you to seriously reflect on it and read it slow and carefully.1 Slow reading is the intentional reduction in the speed of reading, carried out to increase comprehension and pleasure. The background reading is meant to re-familiarise yourself with the historical framework and objects and requires less concentration. Additional literature (for your presentation, blog posts, and essays) can be found in the supplementary reading list-file on Moodle. Some of the theoretical literature will not directly relate to Greek art, this is because it is meant for you to make the connection and for all of us to expand our current ideas on Greek art.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ
    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
    [Show full text]
  • Lord Elgin and the Ottomans: the Question of Permission
    Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law LARC @ Cardozo Law Articles Faculty 2002 Lord Elgin and the Ottomans: The Question of Permission David Rudenstine Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation David Rudenstine, Lord Elgin and the Ottomans: The Question of Permission, 23 Cardozo Law Review 449 (2002). Available at: https://larc.cardozo.yu.edu/faculty-articles/167 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty at LARC @ Cardozo Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by an authorized administrator of LARC @ Cardozo Law. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. LORD ELGIN AND THE OTTOMANS: THE QUESTION OF PERMISSION David Rudenstine* In the early morning light on July 31, 1801, a ship-carpenter, five crew members, and twenty Athenian laborers "mounted the walls" of the Parthenon and with the aid of ropes and pulleys detached and lowered a sculptured marble block depicting a youth and centaur in combatJ The next day the group lowered a second sculptured marble from the magnificent templet Within months, the workers had lowered dozens of additional marble sculptures, and within a few years, most of the rest of the Parthenon's priceless marbles were removed.^ These fabulous marbles, sculptured during the age of Pericles'' under the guiding hand of Phidias' out of fine white Pentelic marble quarried ten miles from Athens and hauled by ox-cart to the Acropolis,® had remained on the Parthenon for 2,200 years before being removed.
    [Show full text]
  • Arcl0017 Greek Art and Architecture Ucl - Institute of Archaeology
    ARCL0017 GREEK ART AND ARCHITECTURE UCL - INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY Coordinator: Dr. Eva Mol Office hours: weekly chat sessions Wed 12-1pm or by appointment between Mon-Wed 9-17pm. Email: [email protected]; Year 2/3 BA Module, 15 credits Please see the online IoA Student Handbook for instructions on coursework submission, IoA referencing guidelines and marking criteria, as well as UCL policies on penalties for late submission. ARCL0017 1. OVERVIEW&SCHEDULE Introduction This module introduces Greek art and architecture in the period 2500-50 BC. In the context of a broad chronological survey, the focus is on three main themes: (1) the relationship between Greek art and society (2) addressing current problems in Greek art history and contemporary society, and (3) extensive training in visual analysis and the different lenses to look at Greek art. This year, as the course will be taught remotely, it will consist of different modes of online teaching that contain individual creativity, group fun, and lively discussions using famous objects and buildings belonging to the so-called ‘Greek canon’, and lesser known or even excluded object categories that will expand our idea of what Greek art is. Normally, we would go to the British Museum together, and look at all the incredible objects up close. This is not possible for the semester, but that does not mean we cannot discuss or study them. In fact, teaching the module online will provide us with the great opportunity to look beyond the British Museum (or any museum for that matter) and the Classical canon, and discuss together what Greek Art is right now, and how make it more relevant in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Sculptures Sarah Pepin
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 02075, 9 June 2017 By John Woodhouse and Sarah Pepin The Parthenon Sculptures Contents: 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 3. Ongoing controversy 4. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Parthenon Sculptures Contents Summary 3 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 5 1.1 Early history 5 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 6 3. Ongoing controversy 7 3.1 Campaign groups in the UK 9 3.2 UK Government position 10 3.3 British Museum position 11 3.4 Greek Government action 14 3.5 UNESCO mediation 14 3.6 Parliamentary interest 15 4. Further reading 20 Contributing Authors: Diana Perks Attribution: Parthenon Sculptures, British Museum by Carole Radatto. Licenced under CC BY-SA 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 9 June 2017 Summary This paper gives an outline of the more recent history of the Parthenon sculptures, their acquisition by the British Museum and the long-running debate about suggestions they be removed from the British Museum and returned to Athens. The Parthenon sculptures consist of marble, architecture and architectural sculpture from the Parthenon in Athens, acquired by Lord Elgin between 1799 and 1810. Often referred to as both the Elgin Marbles and the Parthenon marbles, “Parthenon sculptures” is the British Museum’s preferred term.1 Lord Elgin’s authority to obtain the sculptures was the subject of a Select Committee inquiry in 1816. It found they were legitimately acquired, and Parliament then voted the funds needed for the British Museum to acquire them later that year.
    [Show full text]
  • Greek Cities & Islands of Asia Minor
    MASTER NEGATIVE NO. 93-81605- Y MICROFILMED 1 993 COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES/NEW YORK / as part of the "Foundations of Western Civilization Preservation Project'' Funded by the NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE HUMANITIES Reproductions may not be made without permission from Columbia University Library COPYRIGHT STATEMENT The copyright law of the United States - Title 17, United photocopies or States Code - concerns the making of other reproductions of copyrighted material. and Under certain conditions specified in the law, libraries or other archives are authorized to furnish a photocopy the reproduction. One of these specified conditions is that for any photocopy or other reproduction is not to be "used purpose other than private study, scholarship, or for, or later uses, a research." If a user makes a request photocopy or reproduction for purposes in excess of fair infringement. use," that user may be liable for copyright a This institution reserves the right to refuse to accept fulfillment of the order copy order if, in its judgement, would involve violation of the copyright law. AUTHOR: VAUX, WILLIAM SANDYS WRIGHT TITLE: GREEK CITIES ISLANDS OF ASIA MINOR PLACE: LONDON DA TE: 1877 ' Master Negative # COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES PRESERVATION DEPARTMENT BIBLIOGRAPHIC MTCROFORM TAR^FT Original Material as Filmed - Existing Bibliographic Record m^m i» 884.7 !! V46 Vaux, V7aiion Sandys Wright, 1818-1885. ' Ancient history from the monuments. Greek cities I i and islands of Asia Minor, by W. S. W. Vaux... ' ,' London, Society for promoting Christian knowledce." ! 1877. 188. p. plate illus. 17 cm. ^iH2n KJ Restrictions on Use: TECHNICAL MICROFORM DATA i? FILM SIZE: 3 S'^y^/"^ REDUCTION IMAGE RATIO: J^/ PLACEMENT: lA UA) iB .
    [Show full text]
  • And KEEPING up with the PERSIANS Some Reflections on Cultural Links in the Persian Empire
    Working draft, not for distribution without permission of the author 1 ‘MANNERS MAKYTH MAN’ and KEEPING UP WITH THE PERSIANS Some reflections on cultural links in the Persian Empire Christopher Tuplin (University of Liverpool) Revised version: 9 June 2008 The purpose of the meeting (according to the web site) is to explore how ancient peoples expressed their identities by establishing, constructing, or inventing links with other societies that crossed traditional ethnic and geographic lines. These cross-cultural links complicates, undermine, or give nuance to conventional dichotomies such as self/other, Greek/barbarian, and Jew/gentile In the Achaemenid imperial context this offers a fairly wide remit. But it is a remit limited – or distorted – by the evidence. For in this, as in all aspects of Achaemenid history, we face a set of sources that spreads unevenly across the temporal, spatial and analytical space of the empire. For what might count as an unmediated means of access to a specifically Persian viewpoint we are pretty much confined to iconographically decorated monuments and associated royal inscriptions at Behistun, Persepolis and Susa (which are at least, on the face of it, intended to broach ideological topics) and the Persepolis Fortification and Treasury archives (which emphatically are not). This material is not formally or (to a large extent) chronologically commensurate with the voluminous, but unevenly distributed, Greek discourse that provides so much of the narrative of Achaemenid imperial history. Some of it may appear more commensurate with the substantial body of iconographically decorated monuments (most not associated with inscriptions) derived from western Anatolia that provides much of the material in the two papers under discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • American Journal of Contemporary Hellenic Issues
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF Volume 11 Spring 2020 CONTEMPORARY HELLENIC ISSUES Unifying the Parthenon Sculptures George Vardas Still it survives Ruin’d but in its ruins beautiful William Haygarth.1 The English Romantic poet John Keats first encountered the Parthenon Sculptures in 1817 and through them saw a vision of a lost Hellenic world. In “awe-struck deference,” Keats proceeded to pen a sonnet, On Seeing the Elgin Marbles, his mind dizzy with swirling ideas and an “indescribable feud” within his soul as he wrestled with the “dim-conceived glories of the brain.” Keats contrasted his own mortality to "each imagined pinnacle and steep/Of godlike hardship", the great artistic achievement of immortal "Grecian grandeur" and a certain "magnitude" projected by the sculptures. In Ode on a Grecian Urn Keats’ sylvan historian could but only inquire, “What men or gods are these?" Commencing in 1801 workers engaged by the British Ambassador to Constantinople, the 7th Earl of Elgin, Thomas Bruce, by a combination of bribery of local Ottoman authorities in Athens and a dubious authorization (“firman”), began stripping more than one hundred sculptures and significant fragments consisting of pedimental figures, metope reliefs, and panels from the frieze from the Parthenon temple atop the Acropolis. Originally intended for his own private collection, Lord Elgin was forced under financial pressure to sell the sculptures to the British government, and in 1816 the Elgin Collection of Parthenon Sculptures became an exhibit at the British Museum in London where
    [Show full text]
  • London Top Attractions
    LONDON TOP ATTRACTIONS Westminster Abbey Steeped in history, the pillars of this great vaulted hall stand on the final resting place of the men and women who built Britain. Its great Gothic hall continues to play a part in the formation of the kingdom, having hosted nearly every coronation since 1308. Buckingham Palace Not the prettiest royal residence, but a must-see for the glimpse it affords of the modern life of the monarchy. The opulence of the state rooms open to the public provides plenty of wow factor, and don’t forget the collection of china and carriages at the Queen’s Gallery and Royal Mews next door. St. Paul’s Cathedral No matter how many times you have been before, the scale and elegance of Sir Christopher Wren’s masterpiece never fail to take the breath away. Climb the enormous dome, one of the world’s largest, to experience the freaky acoustics of the Whispering Gallery, and higher still for fantastic views across London. Tower of London The Tower is London at its majestic, idiosyncratic best. This is truly the heart of the kingdom—with foundations dating back nine centuries, every brick tells a story, and the ax-blows and fortunes that have risen and fallen within this turreted mini-city provide an inexhaustible supply of intrigue. British Museum If you want to journey through time and space without leaving the confines of Bloomsbury, a visit to the British Museum holds hours of eye-catching artifacts from the world’s greatest civilizations, including the Elgin Marbles, the Rosetta Stone, and the Sutton Hoo treasure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon and Its Sculptures
    P1: FCH/J-SPH P2: FCH/J-SPH QC: FCH/J-SPH T1: FCH CB720-FM CB720-Cosmopoulos-v1 July 2, 2004 15:49 The Parthenon and its Sculptures Edited by Michael B. Cosmopoulos University of Missouri–St. Louis iii P1: FCH/J-SPH P2: FCH/J-SPH QC: FCH/J-SPH T1: FCH CB720-FM CB720-Cosmopoulos-v1 July 2, 2004 15:49 published by the press syndicate of the university of cambridge The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom cambridge university press The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge cb2 2ru, uk 40 West 20th Street, New York, ny 10011-4211, usa 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, vic 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcon´ 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org C Cambridge University Press 2004 This book is in copyright. Subject to statutory exception and to the provisions of relevant collective licensing agreements, no reproduction of any part may take place without the written permission of Cambridge University Press. First published 2004 Printed in the United Kingdom at the University Press, Cambridge Typefaces Adobe Garamond 11.25/15 pt. and Lithos System LATEX 2ε [tb] A catalog record for this book is available from the British Library. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data is available. isbn 0 521 83673 5 hardback iv P1: FCH/J-SPH P2: FCH/J-SPH QC: FCH/J-SPH T1: FCH CB720-FM CB720-Cosmopoulos-v1 July 2, 2004 15:49 Contents List of Figures page vii On Abbreviations and Transliteration xiii List of Contributors xv Introduction: The Methodological Framework of Parthenon Studies 1 Michael B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Un Vers Ty Pr
    THE UNVERS TY PR NTS 19 IS S UE NO V. 1 . 10 S UP E R S E D I N G A L L P RE VI O US C ATALOGUE S BU R E A U O F UNI VE R S I T ' Y T R AVE L I N B M C H U E T TR ITY P LAC E O STO N. ASSA S T S P oints to be noted in ordering The University P rints P LEASE READ C AREFULLY T his cat al ogue contains a complete list of all the reproductions we T he price of the p rints is one c ent each or eighty cents per hundred. i t ith t he acc an in hand Complete set s of 5 00 pr n s w omp y g book, ' S cial disc nt ofiered sch s or H andbooks separately, pe ou to ool it cl ubs ordering in qu ant y. E ach rie is ish d in nd f r sam st as O lin s and se s publ e bou o m, e yle ut e H and for li rar use. P ric er l the sa as for book, b y e p vo ume, me i unbound ser es. No order for less t han t wenty-five prints will be sent u nless with other goods. A n rd r l an is ncl d it h er a u o e b k e ose w ev y catal ogue .
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Brasileira De Estudos Clássicos C L a S S L C a CLASSICA
    revista brasileira de estudos clássicos C l a s s l C a CLASSICA. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos [ISSN 0103-4316 / e-ISSN 2176-6436] Caixa Postal 905, 30161-970, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ESTUDOS CLÁSSICOS Diretoria (2018-2019) Filomena Yoshie Hirata, USP (Presidente de Honra) Tatiana Oliveira Ribeiro, UFRJ (Presidente) Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda, PUC-Rio (Vice-Presidente) Beatriz Cristina de Paoli Correia, UFRJ (Secretária Geral) Juliana Bastos Marques, UNIRIO (Secretária Adjunta) Charlene Martins Miotti, UFJF (Tesoureira) Fernanda Cunha Sousa, UFJF (Tesoureira Adjunta) EditorES Tatiana Oliveira Ribeiro (UFRJ) Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda (PUC-Rio) CONSELHO EDITORIAL Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda, Presidente, PUC-Rio (2018-2019) Adriane da Silva Duarte, USP (2016-2019) Alessandro Rolin de Moura, UFPR (2013-2019) Fábio Faversani, UFOP (2016-2019) Fábio Vergara Cerqueira, UFPel (2013-2019) Gabriele Cornelli, UnB (2013-2019) Henrique Fortuna Cairus, UFRJ (2016-2019) José Geraldo Costa Grillo, UNIFESP (2013-2019) Kátia Maria Paim Pozzer, UFRGS (2016-2019) Maria Cecília de Miranda N. Coelho, UFMG (2013-2019) Paulo Martins, USP (2013-2019) Paulo Sérgio de Vasconcellos, UNICAMP (2016-2019) Renata Senna Garraffoni, UFPR (2013-2019) Teodoro Rennó Assunção, UFMG (2016-2019) CONSULTORES INTERNACIONAIS Airton Brazil Pollini (Université de Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, França) Aloys Winterling (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Alemanha) Ana María González de Tobia (UNLP, Argentina) Anastasia Bakogianni (Massey
    [Show full text]
  • TH[MKSTOK<L[AN
    HESPERIA 68.4, I999 PAINTING FRM THE ll\v\ TH[MKSTOK<L[ANWALL A RECONSTRUCTION 1. The principaltreatments of the The Neilonides base, now in the Athens EpigraphicalMuseum (EM 12870, Neilonides base are Philadelpheus Figs. 1 and 2), was discovered in 1922 by the Greek archaeologist Alexan- 1922a, 1922b, and 1923; Casson 1925; dros Philadelpheus built into the lowest courses of the Themistoklean wall Rumpf 1938; Raubitschek1939, cols. 62-68; Jeffery 1962, p. 127, no. 19; and south of the Piraeus gate in Athens.' The base consists of a single rectan- Viviers 1992, pp. 67-77. gular block smoothed on three sides; in shape it is a tall, slightly irregular I would like to thank the director, rectangle longer on the front and back sides than on the flanks.2The ob- CharalambosKritzas, and staff of the long plinth cavity on the top surface of the base reveals that it originally EpigraphicalMuseum in Athens for supported a marble statue of the Archaic kouros type. A shallow, rectan- granting me permissionto study EM 12870. Chara Karapa-Molisaniin gular mortise on its underside shows that it was in turn supported by a particularprovided me with daily help rectangularpillar, now lost. and hospitalityduring the summersof Previously,interest in the Neilonides base has focused on its inscrip- 1996 and 1997. Guy Cobolet provided tions and on the circumstances of its discovery. Two inscriptions, both access to the archivesof the Ecole written in the Attic alphabet, appear on the base's front face. The longer francaised'Athenes, and Martin Schafer inscription, first deciphered by A. E.
    [Show full text]