DOCSLIB.ORG

ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – Handbook 2018/19 1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – Handbook 2018/19 1 ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – handbook 2018/19 1 UCL, INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ARCL0162 MAKING AND MEANING IN ANCIENT GREEK ART COURSE-HANDBOOK 2018/19 15 credit optional module - MA [ARCL0163, 20 Credit version – KCL etc] Turnitin Class id: 3885651 Turnitin password: IoA1819 Module coordinator: Professor Jeremy Tanner [email protected] Office: Room 105. Tel: 0207 679 1525 Office hours: Tuesday, Wednesday 11am-12pm 1. Overview of course: This module is designed to develop in students the skills of careful looking, and detailed visual analysis, grounded in a strong awareness of the major theoretical issues, which are central to research in classical art history. It will take the form of a series of seminars addressing key themes in the historiography of classical art through detailed consideration of specific works of art in the British Museum and other London museums, where most classes will be held. Alongside traditional concerns with issues of style and iconography, a particular emphasis will be laid on questions of ‘facture’, ‘materiality’ and ‘agency’ which have been at the centre of recent discussions in archaeology, the anthropology of art and art history. Particular themes and classes may vary from year to year to reflect students’ own research interests, new publications and special exhibitions. Module schedule: Classes will be held in the British Museum, 2-4pm every Tuesday. We will meet in the Great Court at the Entrance to the Egyptian Galleries. 3/10/17: 1. Introduction to the course: some key concepts and approaches 10/10/17: 2. Geometric Greek art and the world of Homer 17/10/17: 3. Orient and orientalising: what is early ‘Greek’ art? 24/10/17: 4. Archaic art and the archaic aesthetic 31/10/17: 5. The artist: role, agency, individuality [7/11/17: Reading Week – No Class] 14/11/17: 6. Periodisation and period styles: classical and late fifth century. 21/11/17: 7. Death and commemoration in fourth century art 28/11/17: 8. The body and naturalism: gender and sexuality in Greek art 5/12/17: 9. Portraits and identities in the Hellenistic world. 12/12/17: 10. Art and materialism in Hellenistic Greece. Essay submission deadlines: The draft for your essay must be submitted to me (as word document, via email attachment) by 10pm on Wednesday 12th December. I plan to return the draft to you, with comments by Thursday 13th 10pm, so that we can meet to discuss on Friday 14th in the morning. Your revised essay for assessment (hard copy and turnitin) must be submitted by 10pm Friday 11th January (first Friday of term 2). Methods of assessment: The module will be assessed by one 3800-4200 word essay. ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – handbook 2018/19 2 Teaching methods: All classes will be taught as seminars in the British Museum. Students will be required to give two presentations in order to complete the course. Students must complete the required readings for each class before the class, and will be expected on this basis to be able to participate actively in class discussion. Workload: There will be 20 hours of seminars for this course. Students will be expected to undertake 100 hours of reading for the course, and 30 hours preparing for and producing the assessed module work. This adds up to a total workload of 150 hours for the course. Prerequisites: Students should normally have a good background in classical (Greco-Roman) art. Other students may take the course, subject to consultation with the module coordinator, but would normally be advised to sit in on the undergraduate option ARCL2007 Greek Art and Architecture. 2. AIMS, OBJECTIVES AND ASSESSMENT Aims To provide a proseminar for the study of Greek art at an advanced level, preparing students to develop dissertation research at MA level and beyond. To provide an advanced level exploration of classic and contemporary theoretical frameworks and methodologies for the understanding of Greek art. To provide a basis in skills of problem definition and visual analysis prerequisite to developing innovative research in Greek art. To offer the possibility studying at first hand some of the major monuments of Greek art through the collections of the British Museum To address a range of key problems in the history of Greek art through close engagement with collections of museums in London. Objectives Students will develop and advanced critical understanding of a range of key issues in the history and historiography of Greek Art. They will develop an active mastery of key theoretical frameworks and methods of analysis in contemporary approaches to the history of Greek art. They will develop key skills of close looking and detailed visual analysis through first hand engagement with objects from the collections of London museums. They will acquire the ability to identify significant research problems in the history of Greek art, as a preparation for developing their own independent research projects. Outcomes Students will: 1) Be able to demonstrate a good understanding of the key principles which inform the systematic and critical visual analysis of works of art 2) Be able to demonstrate a good understanding of key classical and contemporary theoretical and methodological frameworks for the understanding of Greek art 3) Be able critically to evaluate existing research in Greek art, and identify ways in which a range of research programmes might be taken forward 4) Be familiar with the range of visual, textual and archaeological sources relevant to the understanding of Greek art 5) Be able to understand and appreciate the range of problems involved in the interpretation of complex, ambiguous and often incomplete data. ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – handbook 2018/19 3 Assessment Students are required to write one essay of 3800-4200 words. Penalties will only be imposed if you exceed the upper figure in the range. There is no penalty for using fewer words than the lower figure in the range: the lower figure is simply for your guidance and to indicate the sort of length that is expected. Bibliography and captions do not count towards the total word count. Essay questions are listed at the end of each weekly seminar topic. Students are required to submit a draft of their essay, on which they will receive detailed written comment, which should inform the final revised essay which they submit for formal assessment. The draft for your essay must be submitted to me (as word document, via email attachment) by 10pm on Wednesday 12th December. I plan to return the draft to you, with comments by Thursday 13th 10pm, so that we can meet to discuss on Friday 14th December in the morning. Your revised essay for assessment (and turnitin) must be submitted by 10pm Friday 11th January. Students (e.g. from KCL, MA Reception etc) taking this module as a 20 credit option will be required to write, in addition to their standard essay, a (max) 1000 word written version of one of their presentation topics (cannot be topic from the same class as they chose for their essay). This should be submitted directly to JJT by the same date as the revised version of the standard essay. It will be marked on a pass/fail basis. Mark for the module as a whole will be that received for the standard essay, but the module cannot be completed without a pass for the short presentation report. Word-length Your essay should be between 3800 and 4200 words in length. The lower limit is a guideline for expected length; the upper limit is strict, and the standard draconian UCL penalities apply for overlength essays. The following should not be included in the word-count: bibliography, appendices, and tables, graphs and illustrations and their captions. Do feel free, within reason, to write detailed captions (not more than 100 words or so), pointing up specific features of images that play a role in the argument of your essay: quite a useful skill for an art historian, and allows a little wiggle room around the word limit. In the 2018-19 session penalties for over-length work will be as follows: For work that exceeds the specified maximum length by less than 10% the mark will be reduced by five percentage marks, but the penalised mark will not be reduced below the pass mark, assuming the work merited a Pass. For work that exceeds the specified maximum length by 10% or more the mark will be reduced by ten percentage marks, but the penalised mark will not be reduced below the pass mark, assuming the work merited a Pass. Coursework submission procedures All coursework must normally be submitted both as hard copy and electronically. (The only exceptions are bulky portfolios and lab books which are normally submitted as hard copy only.) You should staple the appropriate colour-coded IoA coversheet (available in the IoA library and outside room 411a) to the front of each piece of work and submit it to the red box at the Reception Desk (or room 411a in the case of Year 1 undergraduate work) All coursework should be uploaded to Turnitin by midnight on the day of the deadline. This will date-stamp your work. It is essential to upload all parts of your work as this is sometimes the version that will be marked. Instructions are given below. Note that Turnitin uses the term ‘class’ for what we normally call a ‘course’. 1. Ensure that your essay or other item of coursework has been saved as a Word doc., docx. or PDF document, and that you have the Class ID for the module (available from the module handbook) and enrolment password (this is IoA1819 for all courses ARCL0162 Make/Mean Gk – handbook 2018/19 4 this session - note that this is capital letter I, lower case letter o, upper case A, followed by the current academic year) 2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Full Thesis Text Only
    A DIACHRONIC EXAMINATION OF THE ERECHTHEION AND ITS RECEPTION Alexandra L. Lesk, B.A., M.St. (Oxon.), M.A. Presented to McMicken College of Arts and Sciences and the Department of Classics of the University of Cincinnati in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy 2004 Committee: C. Brian Rose (Chair) Jack L. Davis Kathleen M. Lynch J. James Coulton Abstract iii ABSTRACT “A Diachronic Examination of the Erechtheion and Its Reception” examines the social life of the Ionic temple on the Athenian Akropolis, which was built in the late 5th century B.C. to house Athens’ most sacred cults and relics. Using a contextualized diachronic approach, this study examines both the changes to the Erechtheion between its construction and the middle of the 19th century A.D., as well as the impact the temple had on the architecture and art of these successive periods. This approach allows the evidence to shed light on new areas of interest such as the Post-Antique phases of the building, in addition to affording a better understanding of problems that have plagued the study of the Erechtheion during the past two centuries. This study begins with a re-examination of all the pertinent archaeological, epigraphical, and literary evidence, and proposes a wholly new reconstruction of how the Erechtheion worked physically and ritually in ancient times. After accounting for the immediate influence of the Erechtheion on subsequent buildings of the Ionic order, an argument for a Hellenistic rather than Augustan date for the major repairs to the temple is presented.
    [Show full text]
  • The Parthenon Sculptures Sarah Pepin
    BRIEFING PAPER Number 02075, 9 June 2017 By John Woodhouse and Sarah Pepin The Parthenon Sculptures Contents: 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 3. Ongoing controversy 4. Further reading www.parliament.uk/commons-library | intranet.parliament.uk/commons-library | [email protected] | @commonslibrary 2 The Parthenon Sculptures Contents Summary 3 1. What are the Parthenon Sculptures? 5 1.1 Early history 5 2. How did the British Museum acquire them? 6 3. Ongoing controversy 7 3.1 Campaign groups in the UK 9 3.2 UK Government position 10 3.3 British Museum position 11 3.4 Greek Government action 14 3.5 UNESCO mediation 14 3.6 Parliamentary interest 15 4. Further reading 20 Contributing Authors: Diana Perks Attribution: Parthenon Sculptures, British Museum by Carole Radatto. Licenced under CC BY-SA 2.0 / image cropped. 3 Commons Library Briefing, 9 June 2017 Summary This paper gives an outline of the more recent history of the Parthenon sculptures, their acquisition by the British Museum and the long-running debate about suggestions they be removed from the British Museum and returned to Athens. The Parthenon sculptures consist of marble, architecture and architectural sculpture from the Parthenon in Athens, acquired by Lord Elgin between 1799 and 1810. Often referred to as both the Elgin Marbles and the Parthenon marbles, “Parthenon sculptures” is the British Museum’s preferred term.1 Lord Elgin’s authority to obtain the sculptures was the subject of a Select Committee inquiry in 1816. It found they were legitimately acquired, and Parliament then voted the funds needed for the British Museum to acquire them later that year.
    [Show full text]
  • English for Specific Purposes 1 Esercitazioni (James)
    DISPENSA A.A. 2018 – 2019 English for Specific Purposes 1 Esercitazioni (James) Risk Recreation Ethical Tourism Cultural Heritage (051-2097241; [email protected]) 1 Contents Page 1 Writing 3 Guidelines on essay assessment, writing, style, organization and structure 2 Essay writing exercises 13 3 Reading texts (including reading, listening and writing exercises) Risk Recreation: Tornado Tourism (essay assignment) 20 Ethical tourism: Canned Hunting 28 Pamplona Bull Running 36 La Tomatina 43 Museums and the Ownership of Cultural Heritage: The Rosetta Stone, The Parthenon Marbles, The Mona Lisa 45 (essay assignment) The Impact of Mass Tourism: Venice, Florence, Barcelona 68 All the copyrighted materials included in this ‘dispensa’ belong to the respective owners and, following fair use guidelines, are hereby used for educational purposes only. 2 1 Writing Guidelines on essay assessment, writing, style, organization and structure Assessing writing: criteria Exam task: 500-word argument essay 1 Task achievement (9 points) Has the student focused on the question and respected the length? Fully answers the question in depth. Answers the question in sufficient depth to cover the main points. There are some unnecessary or irrelevant ideas. There are too many minor issues or irrelevant ideas dealt with. Shorter than the required length. Does not answer the question. Much shorter than the required length. 2 Structure and organization (9 points) Does the essay have a structure? Is there an introduction and conclusion? Is the body divided into paragraphs which are linked? There is a suitable introduction and conclusion. Paragraphs and sentences link up and make the essay easy to read and the text easy to understand.
    [Show full text]
  • Winckelmann, Greek Masterpieces, and Architectural Sculpture
    Winckelmann, Greek masterpieces, and architectural sculpture. Prolegomena to a history of classical archaeology in museums Book or Report Section Accepted Version Smith, A. C. (2017) Winckelmann, Greek masterpieces, and architectural sculpture. Prolegomena to a history of classical archaeology in museums. In: Lichtenberger, A. and Raja, R. (eds.) The Diversity of Classical Archaeology. Studies in Classical Archaeology, 1. Brepols. ISBN 9782503574936 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/70169/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Published version at: http://www.brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503574936-1 Publisher: Brepols All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online Winckelmann, Greek Masterpieces, and Architectural Sculpture Prolegomena to a History of Classical Archaeology in Museums∗ Amy C. Smith ‘Much that we might imagine as ideal was natural for them [the ancient Greeks].’1 ♣ Just as Johann Joachim Winckelmann mourned the loss of antiquity, so have subsequent generations mourned his passing at the age of fifty, in 1768, as he was planning his first journey to Greece. His deification through — not least — the placement of his profile head, as if carved out of a gemstone, on the title page of the first volume of his Geschichte der Kunst des Alterthums (‘History of Ancient Art’) in 1776 (the second edition, published posthumously) made him the poster boy for the study of classical art history and its related branches, Altertumswissenschaft or classical studies, history of art, and classical 2 archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Revista Brasileira De Estudos Clássicos C L a S S L C a CLASSICA
    revista brasileira de estudos clássicos C l a s s l C a CLASSICA. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Clássicos [ISSN 0103-4316 / e-ISSN 2176-6436] Caixa Postal 905, 30161-970, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE ESTUDOS CLÁSSICOS Diretoria (2018-2019) Filomena Yoshie Hirata, USP (Presidente de Honra) Tatiana Oliveira Ribeiro, UFRJ (Presidente) Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda, PUC-Rio (Vice-Presidente) Beatriz Cristina de Paoli Correia, UFRJ (Secretária Geral) Juliana Bastos Marques, UNIRIO (Secretária Adjunta) Charlene Martins Miotti, UFJF (Tesoureira) Fernanda Cunha Sousa, UFJF (Tesoureira Adjunta) EditorES Tatiana Oliveira Ribeiro (UFRJ) Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda (PUC-Rio) CONSELHO EDITORIAL Luisa Severo Buarque de Holanda, Presidente, PUC-Rio (2018-2019) Adriane da Silva Duarte, USP (2016-2019) Alessandro Rolin de Moura, UFPR (2013-2019) Fábio Faversani, UFOP (2016-2019) Fábio Vergara Cerqueira, UFPel (2013-2019) Gabriele Cornelli, UnB (2013-2019) Henrique Fortuna Cairus, UFRJ (2016-2019) José Geraldo Costa Grillo, UNIFESP (2013-2019) Kátia Maria Paim Pozzer, UFRGS (2016-2019) Maria Cecília de Miranda N. Coelho, UFMG (2013-2019) Paulo Martins, USP (2013-2019) Paulo Sérgio de Vasconcellos, UNICAMP (2016-2019) Renata Senna Garraffoni, UFPR (2013-2019) Teodoro Rennó Assunção, UFMG (2016-2019) CONSULTORES INTERNACIONAIS Airton Brazil Pollini (Université de Haute Alsace, Mulhouse, França) Aloys Winterling (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Alemanha) Ana María González de Tobia (UNLP, Argentina) Anastasia Bakogianni (Massey
    [Show full text]
  • The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass Bonnie Jean Roche Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Repository Citation Roche, Bonnie Jean, "Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass" (2011). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1049. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1049 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MUSEUMS AND RESTITUTION: THE ACTIONS AND EFFECTS OF DR. ZAHI HAWASS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Humanities By BONNIE JEAN ROCHE Bachelors of Liberal Arts Bowling Green State University, 2008 2011 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 10, 2011 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Bonnie Jean Roche ENTITLED Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Humanities. _________________________________ Donovan Miyasaki, Ph.D. Project Director _________________________________ Ava Chamberlain, Ph.D. Director, Master of Humanities Program Committee on Final Examination: __________________________________ Dawne Dewey, MA. __________________________________ Karla Huebner, Ph.D. __________________________________ Andrew Hsu, Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Roche, Bonnie Jean.
    [Show full text]
  • Quiz 1 Answer Key Following Is Information to Help You Assess Your
    Quiz 1 Answer Key Following is information to help you assess your success in answering the questions in Quiz 1. Each answer is worth 5 points for a total of 75 points. Usually, it can be considered that each important piece of information within an answer is worth 1 point. If you omitted some of the points below in your answers but made other important and relevant points instead, you would not necessarily have lost points. Following is the grading scale: 67 points and above: A 60–66 points: B 52–59 points: C 45–51 points: D Below 45 points: F 1. What culture(s) and historical era does classical antiquity refer to? What are some of the important values that this/these culture(s) promoted? Comment [AB1]: Note to self: Make all questions match the quiz. To have fully answered this question you should have, at some point, mentioned the time period spreading from approximately 500 BC to 400 AD. Also included in your answer should be the fact that when we refer to the cultures of classical antiquity we refer to those of ancient Greece and Rome. Some of the values that were promoted by these cultures and that you could have mentioned are: humanism, reason, beauty, and civic involvement. It would have been good to briefly explain the values you chose in their ancient context. 2. What is the Geometric period of Greek art? Situate this period on a timeline, and explain its title and its style. What periods came before and after it? The Geometric period of Greek art spanned the 9th and 8th centuries BC.
    [Show full text]
  • Bronze Work of the Geometric Period and Its Relation to Later Art Author(S): S
    Bronze Work of the Geometric Period and Its Relation to Later Art Author(s): S. Casson Source: The Journal of Hellenic Studies, Vol. 42, Part 2 (1922), pp. 207-219 Published by: The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/625903 . Accessed: 08/01/2015 16:28 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The Society for the Promotion of Hellenic Studies is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Hellenic Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 128.235.251.160 on Thu, 8 Jan 2015 16:28:00 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions BRONZE WORK OF THE GEOMETRIC PERIOD AND ITS RELATION TO LATER ART 'IN the pottery of the Geometric style,' says Dr. Buschor in his Greek Vase Painting,1 'are latent the forces which we see afterwards expanding in contact with the East as well as the oldest beginnings that we can trace of that brilliant continuous development which led to the proud heights of Klitias, Euphronios and Meidias. Its producers may be unreservedly described as Greeks.' The statement.
    [Show full text]
  • Drawing After the Antique at the British Museum
    Drawing after the Antique at the British Museum Supplementary Materials: Biographies of Students Admitted to Draw in the Townley Gallery, British Museum, with Facsimiles of the Gallery Register Pages (1809 – 1817) Essay by Martin Myrone Contents Facsimile, Transcription and Biographies • Page 1 • Page 2 • Page 3 • Page 4 • Page 5 • Page 6 • Page 7 Sources and Abbreviations • Manuscript Sources • Abbreviations for Online Resources • Further Online Resources • Abbreviations for Printed Sources • Further Printed Sources 1 of 120 Jan. 14 Mr Ralph Irvine, no.8 Gt. Howland St. [recommended by] Mr Planta/ 6 months This is probably intended for the Scottish landscape painter Hugh Irvine (1782– 1829), who exhibited from 8 Howland Street in 1809. “This young gentleman, at an early period of life, manifested a strong inclination for the study of art, and for several years his application has been unremitting. For some time he was a pupil of Mr Reinagle of London, whose merit as an artist is well known; and he has long been a close student in landscape afer Nature” (Thom, History of Aberdeen, 1: 198). He was the third son of Alexander Irvine, 18th laird of Drum, Aberdeenshire (1754–1844), and his wife Jean (Forbes; d.1786). His uncle was the artist and art dealer James Irvine (1757–1831). Alexander Irvine had four sons and a daughter; Alexander (b.1777), Charles (b.1780), Hugh, Francis, and daughter Christian. There is no record of a Ralph Irvine among the Irvines of Drum (Wimberley, Short Account), nor was there a Royal Academy student or exhibiting or listed artist of this name, so this was surely a clerical error or misunderstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Bieber, Margarete Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; Proquest Pg
    New Trends in the New Books on Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Bieber, Margarete Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies; Summer 1965; 6, 2; ProQuest pg. 75 New Trends in the New Books on Ancient Art, 1958-1964 Margarete Bieber TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD Page I PRE-GREEK ART 76 1. Oriental Art 76 2. Crete and Mycenae 77 II GREECE 78 1. Archaic Period 78 2. Vase Painting 79 3. Handbooks 82 4. Architecture 88 III REPRINTS 89 IV ETRURIA 93 V ROMAN ART 96 1. Comprehensive Books 96 2. Roman Provinces 100 3. Architecture 107 4. Sculpture 115 5. Painting and Mosaic 116 VI CATALOGUES OF MUSEUMS AND EXHIBITIONS 120 CONCLUSION 141 Foreword HERE HAS BEEN AN ENORMOUS OUTPUT of books on ancient art Tsince I reported on publications appearing between 1952-1957.1 Librarians, classicists, historians, and art lovers have asked me from time to time which of this flood of books they ought to buy for their libraries or their private reading. I thought it desirable, therefore, 1 CW 52 (1958) 72-75. 75 76 NEW TRENDS IN THE NEW BOOKS ON ANCIENT ART, 1958-1964 to compile a kind of critical bibliography of the best books which have appeared in the last six years. In the following survey, I have included those which I consider most important among works available to me, and I have mentioned a few of which I have at least seen a favourable review. I have arranged these books according to subject, giving pre­ ference to good surveys of larger fields. I have excluded encyclopedias, articles in periodicals, and reports on excavations.
    [Show full text]
  • Knowledge Organiser-Year 4 Art-Summer Term
    Art and Design Technology-Year 4 – Ancient Greece Linked to the term’s topic on Ancient Greece children will learn about the different types of ancient Greek art with a focus on ceramics. Pupils will create their own vase out of clay and create their own patterns on their vases. In this unit children will: Key Vocabulary Learn about the different sorts of Greek art. Decorative – some vases were for practical reasons and They will know what geometric art, black figure others were to look good for wealthy Greek homes. These potter and red figure pottery is. were purely decorative. Pupils will understand that some pottery was Geometric art – Geometric art is a phase of Greek art decorative whilst others were practical. characterized larelgy by eometric motif in vase paintings. They will know the name of some different types of You will see patterns rather than people on these vases. Greek pottery. Pupils will collect images of Greek pottery and Black figure pottery – black figures wlll be found on these geometric patterns in their sketch books and vases. annotate them. Red figure pottery – red figure will be found on these vases. They will sketch out their own designs and patterns Clay – a 3D material used to make the vases. analysing and evaluating them in their sketchbooks. Clay slip – watered down clay used to stick down the clay. Pupils will explore clay as a medium. Hermonax – a famous Greek vase painter. Pupils will create a clay vase. Evaluate – something artists and designers do at the end of a Pupils will evaluate their vase in their sketchbook.
    [Show full text]
  • Excavating Freytag's Pyramid Narrative, Identity and the Museum
    EXCAVATING FREYTAG’S PYRAMID NARRATIVE, IDENTITY AND THE MUSEUM VISITOR EXPERIENCE David William Francis 2019 UCL Research Degree: Institute of Archaeology Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 I, David William Francis, confirm that the work presented in this thesis is my own. Where information has been derived from other sources, I confirm that this has been indicated in the thesis. 2 Abstract In this thesis, I attempt to trace the thread that links the theoretical concept of narrative to the museum blockbuster exhibition. I adopt a qualitative dialogic approach, exploring the topic of narrative from the perspective of both exhibition makers and museum visitors. Semi-structured interviews with museum professionals provide an insight into the strategies and practices involved in the encoding of narrative in museum exhibitions. Interviews with members of the public reveal how visitors decode exhibition narratives, while also illustrating the role museums play in the stories people tell about themselves. Narrative is a term that is often used in reference to museums but is frequently under-theorised. My case studies – three blockbuster exhibitions held at the British Museum from 2013 to 2015 – each approach the question of how is narrative as a concept relevant in helping us understand the critical issue of the museum from different perspectives. Drawing on the work of the Roland Barthes and the Mikhail Bakhtin, I investigate how concepts taken from literary theory such as plot structure and narratorial perspective might manifests themselves in the space of a museum exhibition. Using the concept of cultural capital taken from the work of the French Sociologist Pierre Bourdieu, I also explore the role a visitor’s social background and familiarity with museums plays in their decision to follow a narrative or reject it.
    [Show full text]