Saskatchewan Leader's Guide
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Résultats Par Circonscription Des Élections De 1999
Résultats par circonscription des élections de 1999 1. Arm River Lib : 31 % NPD : 25 % Sask : 44 % 2. Athabasca Lib : 13 % NPD : 84 % Sask: 3 % 3. Battleford-Cut Knife Lib : 18 % NPD: 36 % Sask: 46 % 4. Cannington Lib : 10 % NPD : 15 % Sask : 75 % 5. Canora-Pelly Lib : 12 % NPD : 28 % Sask: 58 % 6. Carrot River Valley Lib : 9 % NPD: 40 % Sask: 51 % 7. Cumberland Lib: 18 % NPD: 69 % Sask: 3 % 8. Cypress Hills Lib: 16 % NPD: 21 % Sask: 63 % 9. Estevan Lib: 32 % NPD: 19 % NGA: 2 % Sask: 47 % 10. Humboldt Lib: 17 % NPD: 35 % NGA: 3 % Sask: 45 % 11. Indian Head-Milestone Lib: 21 % NPD: 29 % NGA: 2 % Sask: 45 % 12. Kelvington-Wadena Lib: 6 % NPD: 28 % Sask: 66 % 13. Kindersley Lib: 16 % NPD: 20 % Sask: 63 % 14. Last Moutain-Touchwood Lib: 17 % NPD: 36 % Sask: 47 % 15. Lloydminster Lib: 8 % NPD: 39 % Sask: 53 % 16. Meadow Lake Lib: 12 % NPD: 47 % Sask: 41 % 17. Melfort-Tisdale Lib: 17 % NPD: 32 % Sask: 52 % 18. Melville Lib: 45 % NPD: 27 % Sask: 28 % 19. Moose Jaw nord Lib: 9 % NPD: 50 % Sask: 41 % 20. Moose Jaw Wakamow Lib: 11 % NPD: 54 % PC: 2 % Sask: 33 % 21. Moosomin Lib: 20 % NPD: 21 % Sask: 60 % 22. North Battleford Lib: 48 % NPD: 37 % Sask: 14 % 23. Prince Albert Carlton Lib: 16 % NPD: 54 % Sask: 30 % 24. Prince Albert Northcote Lib: 32 % NPD: 50 % PC: 3 % Sask: 15 % 25. Redberry Lake Lib: 14 % NPD: 32 % NGA: 2 % Sask: 51 % 26. Regina Centre Lib : 22 % NPD : 52 % NGA: 8 % PC: 3 % Sask : 15 % 27. Regina Coronation Park Lib: 22 % NPD: 52 % PC: 2 % Sask: 24 % 28. -
Souris R1ve.R Investigation
INTERNATIONAL JOINT COMMISSION REPORT ON THE SOURIS R1VE.R INVESTIGATION OTTAWA - WASHINGTON 1940 OTTAWA EDMOND CLOUTIER PRINTER TO THE KING'S MOST EXCELLENT MAJESTY 1941 INTERNATIONAT, JOINT COMMISSION OTTAWA - WASHINGTON CAKADA UNITEDSTATES Cllarles Stewrt, Chnirmun A. 0. Stanley, Chairman (korge 11'. Kytc Roger B. McWhorter .J. E. I'erradt R. Walton Moore Lawrence ,J. Burpee, Secretary Jesse B. Ellis, Secretary REFERENCE Under date of January 15, 1940, the following Reference was communicated by the Governments of the United States and Canada to the Commission: '' I have the honour to inform you that the Governments of Canada and the United States have agreed to refer to the International Joint Commission, underthe provisions of Article 9 of theBoundary Waters Treaty, 1909, for investigation, report, and recommendation, the following questions with respect to the waters of the Souris (Mouse) River and its tributaries whichcross the InternationalBoundary from the Province of Saskatchewanto the State of NorthDakota and from the Stat'e of NorthDakota to the Province of Manitoba:- " Question 1 In order to secure the interests of the inhabitants of Canada and the United States in the Souris (Mouse) River drainage basin, what apportion- ment shouldbe made of the waters of the Souris(Mouse) River and ita tributaries,the waters of whichcross theinternational boundary, to the Province of Saskatchewan,the State of North Dakota, and the Province of Manitoba? " Question ,$! What methods of control and operation would be feasible and desirable in -
Morning Conditions Report Assiniboine River
Hydrologic Forecasting and Water Management July 22, 2020 Morning Conditions Report PROVISIONAL DATA http://www.gov.mb.ca/mit/floodinfo Assiniboine River - Tributaries Map Today's Conditions Change Today's Conditions Change ID LOCATION (Imperial) from (Metric) from Jul 21 Jul 21 FLOW LEVEL FLOW LEVEL (m) (cfs) (ft) (ft) (cms) (m) 1 Conjuring Creek near Russell 3 1,813.79 +0.03 0.1 552.84 +0.01 2 Smith Creek near Marchwell 0 1.22 -0.03 0.0 0.37 -0.01 3 Silver Creek near Binscarth 4 Cutarm Creek near Spy Hill 5 3.98 -0.01 0.1 1.21 0.00 5 Scissor Creek near Mcauley 2 2.96 +0.01 0.1 0.90 0.00 6 Birdtail Creek near Birtle 46 1,588.85 +0.22 1.3 484.28 +0.07 7 Arrow River near Arrow River 11 331.58 -0.03 0.3 101.07 -0.01 8 Gopher Creek near Virden 1 2.10 +0.06 0.0 0.64 +0.02 9 Oak River near Rivers 136 3.53 -0.05 3.8 1.08 -0.01 10 Baileys Creek near Oak Lake 0 337.50 -0.07 0.0 102.87 -0.02 11 Rolling River near Erickson 263 1,993.57 -0.11 7.4 607.64 -0.03 12 Little Saskatchewan River near Horod 102 26.76 -0.03 2.9 8.16 -0.01 13 Little Saskatchewan River near Minnedosa 512 1,715.84 -0.18 14.5 522.99 -0.05 14 Minnedosa Lake 1,682.47 +0.08 512.82 +0.02 15 Little Saskatchewan River above Rapid City Dam** 16 Rivers Reservoir* 1,538.18 -0.14 468.84 -0.04 17 Little Saskatchewan River near Rivers 1,819 1,484.00 -0.17 51.5 452.32 -0.05 18 Little Souris River near Brandon 19 4.96 -0.03 0.5 1.51 -0.01 19 Epinette Creek near Carberry 13 1.41 -0.01 0.4 0.43 0.00 20 Cypress River near Bruxelles 50 329.85 +0.64 1.4 100.54 +0.19 21 Sturgeon Creek at St. -
COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN Southwestern Manitoba Mixed
Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IBA Page 1 of 1 COMMUNITY CONSERVATION PLAN for the Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IMPORTANT BIRD AREA A Grassland Bird Initiative for Southwestern Manitoba's - • Poverty Plains • Lyleton-Pierson Prairies • Souris River Lowlands Prepared by: Cory Lindgren, Ken De Smet Manitoba IBA Program Species At Risk Biologist Oak Hammock Marsh Wildlife Branch, Manitoba Conservation Box 1160, Stonewall, Manitoba R0E 2Z0 200 Saulteaux Crescent, Winnipeg R3J 3W3 Manitoba IBA Program 10/03/01 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Southwestern Manitoba Mixed-grass Prairie IBA Page 2 of 2 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 8 1.1 The Poverty Plains.......................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Souris River Lowlands ................................................................................................................... 8 1.3 Lyleton-Pierson Prairies ................................................................................................................ 9 2.0 THE IBA PROGRAM........................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 IBA Manitoba ........................................................................................................................... -
Probing the Inclusion of First Nations in Saskatchewan's Watershed Planning Framework
The International Indigenous Policy Journal Volume 10|Issue5 November 2019 Planning Around Reserves: Probing the Inclusion of First Nations in Saskatchewan's Watershed Planning Framework Warrick Baijius University of Saskatchewan, [email protected] Robert J. Patrick University of Saskatchewan, [email protected] Recommended Citation Baijius W., & Patrick, R. J.(2019). Planning around reserves: Probing the inclusion of First Nations in Saskatchewan's watershed planning framework. The International Indigenous Policy Journal, 10(5). doi: https://10.18584/iipj.2019.10.5.8502 Planning Around Reserves: Probing the Inclusion of First Nations in Saskatchewan's Watershed Planning Framework Abstract Watershed-based planning in Saskatchewan began in earnest after 2006 under the auspices of the Saskatchewan Watershed Authority. Within a decade, a dozen watershed plans were produced following a planning framework that included technical and watershed resident committees. First Nation communities, or "reserves," exist within these watershed areas. This article probes the inclusion of First Nations in those plans. Using document analysis and keyword search, our analysis explores any spatial relationship that may exist between First Nation inclusion and the amount of reserve land in a watershed. The results of this research show that First Nation inclusion is limited in watershed planning in Saskatchewan. We see opportunity for more effective watershed planning through greater collaboration with First Nations. Keywords watershed planning, First Nations, Indigenous, Saskatchewan, Canada Acknowledgments Funding for this research was provided from the Canadian Pacific Railway Partnership Program in Aboriginal Development Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 4.0License. -
International Souris River Board
International Souris River Board Presentation to the Water Topics Overview Committee August 14, 2018 Minot, ND Outline 1. Basin Characteristic 2. International Souris River Board 3. International Souris River Study Board International Souris River Board 2 Souris River Basin International Souris River Board 3 International Souris River Board Administration Board Structure 9 Members for Canada - agency and public 9 Members for the United States - agency and public Hydrology Committee Flow Forecasting Liaison Committee Aquatic Ecosystem Health Committee Observer status for Interested Parties International Souris River Board 4 Membership Canada United States Manitoba Sustainable Development - North Dakota State Water Commission Quantity North Dakota Department of Health Manitoba Sustainable Development - North Dakota Game and Fish Quality Department Saskatchewan Water Security Agency - United States Army Corps of Engineers Quality United States Geological Survey Saskatchewan Water Security Agency - United States Fish and Wildlife Service Quantity Basin Representation Environment Canada – Quality and Quantity Ward County Commissioner Retired Federal Civil Servant Natural Resources Conservation Service Local Representative Basin Representation Upper Souris Watershed Association Assiniboine River Basin Initiative Reeve, Manitoba Canadian and United States Co-Secretaries International Souris River Board 5 International Souris River Board January 2007 Directive: 1. Oversee the implementation of compliance with the 2000 Interim Measures as Modified 1. Saskatchewan has the right to divert, store, and use waters that originate in Saskatchewan provided the annual flow of the Souris River at the Sherwood Crossing is not diminished by more than 50 percent. 2. North Dakota will deliver 20 cfs to Manitoba from June to October 2. Assist the Commission with the Joint Water Quality Monitoring Program 3. -
2019 Annual Report
ANNUAL REPORT 2019 MANAGEMENT The Buffalo Pound Water Treatment Plant management staff may TEAM Plant is located approximately be reached by e-mail at the thirty kilometres northeast of the following addresses: City of Moose Jaw, Saskatchewan, Ryan Johnson on Highway No. 301, seventeen General Manager kilometres north of the [email protected] intersection with Highway No. 1. Blair Kardash The Plant’s mailing address is Laboratory and Research Manager PO Box 944, Moose Jaw, [email protected] Saskatchewan, S6H 2V2. Keith Guillaume The telephone number is Operations and Safety Manager 306-694-1377. [email protected] Information about the Buffalo Harry Gahra Pound Water Treatment Plant is also Maintenance and Engineering available from the Plant’s website. Manager This may be accessed by going to: [email protected] http://www.buffalopoundwtp.ca Laurie Wilkinson Office and Board Support Manager [email protected] BUFFALO POUND WATER 2 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 2019 ANNUAL REPORT BUFFALO POUND WATER 3 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 5 BOARD CHAIRPERSON’S LETTER 6 GENERAL MANAGER’S LETTER 7 MANDATE, MISSION, GOALS AND VALUES 9 STRATEGIC PLAN 10 THE YEAR IN REVIEW RESOURCES 12 PLANT OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE 16 CAPITAL PLAN 20 PLANT SAFETY 24 RISK REVIEW 25 KPIs 27 REGULATORY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS 30 HUMAN RESOURCES 31 RESEARCH 34 BUDGET 37 APPENDICES APPENDIX 1 WATER QUALITY ANALYTICAL DATA - 2019 41 APPENDIX 2 AUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - 2019 54 BUFFALO POUND WATER 4 ANNUAL REPORT 2019 INTRODUCTION ABOUT THIS BUFFALO POUND WATER REPORT BOARD OF DIRECTORS This report summarizes the The Buffalo Pound Water Board activities and major events of the of Directors (the “Board”) was Buffalo Pound Water Treatment created in 2016 by the Unanimous Corporation (the “Corporation”) for Membership Agreement (UMA), the operations of the Buffalo Pound which replaced the previous Buffalo Water Treatment Plant (the “Plant”) Pound Water Administration during 2019. -
Prepared For
Application Submitted to the NEB Appendix 6 106°0'0"W 104°0'0"W 102°0'0"W 28 28 Imperial 27 27 Springside UV369 27 Govan 27 Roblin Davidson 26 Yorkton 44 26 UV5 26UV November 2014 ¯ 26 UV15 52 UV 16A 31 30 UV 02 25 32 Ituna 06 05 04 03 12 25 09 08 07 FIGURE 3 11 SHEET 2 OF 2 25 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 25 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 Last 381 24 UV 83 WATER CROSSINGS SK-WC44 Mountain Strasbourg 24 UV SASKATCHEWAN 24 Lake Saltcoats 24 L Craik 51°0'0"N o 23 ENBRIDGE PIPELINES INC. Craik 20 o UV n 310 23 LINE 3 REPLACEMENT PROGRAM C UV 51°0'0"N 220 r Melville Bredenbury 80 !. UV 23 Southey ee Cupar UV 23 k A 10427 !( SK-WC46 22 s SKP 600 s i 22 Langenburg n Churchbridge i Water Crossing 22 b 322 22 10 o UV UV 21 16 i Russell SK-WC47 UV n !. Station Kilometre Post Fort Balcarres 45 21 e 354 UV UV R 21 A Regina 21 Qu'appelle !( r 210 i Existing Pump Station m UV v Ri Beach Lemberg 20 e ve r r 20 UV22 K ") Existing Terminal Station 20 Bethune apo 20 sv 56 Esterhazy a Line 3 Replacement Pipeline Route 11 Lumsden UV 19 r UV42 UV 19 C SASKATCHEWAN re Existing Line 3 Pipeline 19 !( 19 364 e 19A k UV Qu MANITOBA Indian Ap19A UV247 SK-WC52 pe 892 Highway Qu'appelle ll 18 UV 18 Head e River 18 SK-WC48 Pilot 18 1 Road T SK-WC53 Butte Balgonie UV Sintaluta hu Moose SK-WC49 8 n Regina 17 UV Railway d UV41 17 er !. -
Geomorphic and Sedimentological History of the Central Lake Agassiz Basin
Electronic Capture, 2008 The PDF file from which this document was printed was generated by scanning an original copy of the publication. Because the capture method used was 'Searchable Image (Exact)', it was not possible to proofread the resulting file to remove errors resulting from the capture process. Users should therefore verify critical information in an original copy of the publication. Recommended citation: J.T. Teller, L.H. Thorleifson, G. Matile and W.C. Brisbin, 1996. Sedimentology, Geomorphology and History of the Central Lake Agassiz Basin Field Trip Guidebook B2; Geological Association of CanadalMineralogical Association of Canada Annual Meeting, Winnipeg, Manitoba, May 27-29, 1996. © 1996: This book, orportions ofit, may not be reproduced in any form without written permission ofthe Geological Association ofCanada, Winnipeg Section. Additional copies can be purchased from the Geological Association of Canada, Winnipeg Section. Details are given on the back cover. SEDIMENTOLOGY, GEOMORPHOLOGY, AND HISTORY OF THE CENTRAL LAKE AGASSIZ BASIN TABLE OF CONTENTS The Winnipeg Area 1 General Introduction to Lake Agassiz 4 DAY 1: Winnipeg to Delta Marsh Field Station 6 STOP 1: Delta Marsh Field Station. ...................... .. 10 DAY2: Delta Marsh Field Station to Brandon to Bruxelles, Return En Route to Next Stop 14 STOP 2: Campbell Beach Ridge at Arden 14 En Route to Next Stop 18 STOP 3: Distal Sediments of Assiniboine Fan-Delta 18 En Route to Next Stop 19 STOP 4: Flood Gravels at Head of Assiniboine Fan-Delta 24 En Route to Next Stop 24 STOP 5: Stott Buffalo Jump and Assiniboine Spillway - LUNCH 28 En Route to Next Stop 28 STOP 6: Spruce Woods 29 En Route to Next Stop 31 STOP 7: Bruxelles Glaciotectonic Cut 34 STOP 8: Pembina Spillway View 34 DAY 3: Delta Marsh Field Station to Latimer Gully to Winnipeg En Route to Next Stop 36 STOP 9: Distal Fan Sediment , 36 STOP 10: Valley Fill Sediments (Latimer Gully) 36 STOP 11: Deep Basin Landforms of Lake Agassiz 42 References Cited 49 Appendix "Review of Lake Agassiz history" (L.H. -
Canada's Rivers at Risk
Canada’s Rivers at Risk Environmental Flows and Canada’s Freshwater Future Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Canada’s River’s at Risk WWF-Canada acknowledges the valuable Cover page Rivers contributions of the river scientists, advocates, Large photo © Garth Lenz / WWF-Canada Skeena © Mike Ambach / WWF-Canada and managers from across Canada who lent Dam © Ontario Power Generation Mackenzie © Tessa Macintosh / WWF-Canada their time and insights to this report. Special Sunset © Becky Swainson Fraser © Michel Roggo / WWF-Canon 2 Summary thanks to Becky Swainson for synthesizing vast Irrigation © Photodisc Athabasca © Jiri Rezac / WWF-UK volumes of information into the technical study Parliament © Jupiter Images Nipigon © Gord Ellis on which Canada’s Rivers at Risk is based, and Dry earth © Photodisc Grand © GRCA photo by Carl Hiebert 4 Introduction Ottawa © Alex Indigo to Brian Richter, Oliver Brandes, Tim Morris, Table of contents South Saskatchewan © Rob Huntley David Schindler, Tom Le Quesne and Allan Locke © Garth Lenz / WWF-Canada for their thoughtful reviews. WWF-Canada also St. Lawrence © Dave Finger wishes to acknowledge Sarah Weber of Lightning Summary Saint John © Gilbert Van Ryckevorsel / WWF-Canada 6 Environmental Flows: Threats and Impacts © Garth Lenz / WWF-Canada Editorial and the staff at Mystique Creative for Conclusion their work on the final product. Introduction © Garth Lenz / WWF-Canada © Greg Stott / WWF-Canada Finally, WWF-Canada gratefully acknowledges Back cover 8 Skeena River John McCutcheon for his long-standing commit- Environmental Flows © Garth Lenz / WWF-Canada ment to freshwater protection in Canada. We also Large photo © Frank Parhizgar / WWF-Canada thank the Pat and John McCutcheon Charitable Dam © Patricia Buckley / WWF-Canada 10 Mackenzie River Foundation and Ted Hogarth for providing financial Irrigation © Patricia Buckley / WWF-Canada support to this project. -
Water Quality Report
Central Assiniboine Watershed Integrated Watershed Management Plan - Water Quality Report October 2010 Central Assiniboine Watershed – Water Quality Report Water Quality Investigations and Routine Monitoring: This report provides an overview of the studies and routine monitoring which have been undertaken by Manitoba Water Stewardship’s Water Quality Management Section within the Central Assiniboine watershed. There are six long term water quality monitoring stations (1965 – 2009) within the Central Assiniboine Watershed. These include the Assiniboine, Souris and Cypress Rivers. There are also ten stations not part of the long term water quality monitoring program in which some data are available for alternate locations on the Assiniboine, Souris, and Little Saskatchewan Rivers. The Central Assiniboine River watershed area is characterized primarily by agricultural crop land, industry, urban and rural centres. All these land uses have the potential to negatively impact water quality, if not managed appropriately. Cropland can present water quality concerns in terms of fertilizer and pesticide runoff entering surface water. There are a number of large industrial operations in the Central Assiniboine Watershed, these present water quality concerns in terms of wastewater effluent and industrial runoff. Large centers and rural municipalities present water quality concerns in terms of wastewater treatment and effluent. The tributary of most concern in the Central Assiniboine watershed is the Assiniboine River, as it is the largest river in the watershed. The area surrounding the Assiniboine River is primarily agricultural production yielding a high potential for nutrient and bacteria loading. The Assiniboine River serves as the main drinking water source for many residents in this watershed. In addition, the Assiniboine River drains into Lake Winnipeg, and as such has been listed as a vulnerable water body in the Nutrient Management Regulation under the Water Protection Act. -
Manitoba's Flood of 2011
Manitoba’s Flood of 2011 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Steve Topping, P. Eng Executive Director, Regulatory and Operational Services Manitoba Water Stewardship September 13 , 2011 why was there so much water this year? why this flood was so different than 1997? was this a record-breaking year? Why was there so much water? • Antecedent Soil Moisture – April-October 2010 • Snow Moisture, Density and Depth •2010 was the 5th wettest September through February on record following the first wettest on record (2009) and 3rd wettest (2010). October 26-28th 2010 Why was there so much water? • Antecedent Soil Moisture – April-October 2010 • Snow Moisture, Density and Depth • Geography Snow Pack 2011 •Snowfall totals 75 to 90 inches, nearly double the climatological average. Newdale: 6-7 ft snow depth Why was there so much water? • Antecedent Soil Moisture – April-October 2010 • Snow Moisture, Density and Depth • Geography • Precipitation this Spring Why was there so much water? • Antecedent Soil Moisture – April-October 2010 • Snow Moisture, Density and Depth • Geography • Precipitation this Spring • Storm events at the wrong time •15th year of current wet cycle, resulting in very little storage in the soils Why was there so much water? • Antecedent Soil Moisture – April-October 2010 • Snow Moisture, Density and Depth • Geography • Precipitation this Spring • Storm events at the wrong time • Many watersheds flooding simultaneously May Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Pre-Flood Preparation • Supplies and Equipment • 3 amphibex icebreakers • 7 ice cutting machines • 3 amphibious ATVs • 3 million sandbags • 30,000 super sandbags • 3 sandbagging units (total of 6) • 24 heavy duty steamers (total of 61) • 43 km of cage barriers • 21 mobile pumps (total of 26) • 72 km of water filled barriers • and much more...