DOCSLIB.ORG

ERTMS Programme Signalling System Engineering Process

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ERTMS Programme Signalling System Engineering Process ERTMS Programme Signalling System Engineering Process Guideline Engineering Guidelines 16E Updated document 07.04.2020 INGGJO NEDJON KJHO 15E Updated document 05.02.2020 INGGJO NEDJON KJHO 14E Updated document 05.11.2019 INGGJO NEDJON KJHO 00E First Issue 12.12.2016 JANRUN KJHO MAGHEG Revision Reason for issue Date Created by Contr. by Appr. by Title: Pages: 199 ERTMS Programme Produced by: Bane NOR Digitalisation and Technology Signalling System Engineering Process Guideline Engineering Guidelines Prod.doc.no.: Rev: Replaces: Replaced by: Project: ERTMS Programme Document number: Revision: Area: Trackside ERP-30-S-00097 16E Operator's document no.: Operator's rev.: NA NA Page: 2 of 199 ERTMS Signalling System Doc. No: ERP-30-S-00097 Programme Engineering Guidelines Rev: 16E Date: 07.04.2020 This document was created by DOORS and updated by the author with correct revision details, signatures, operator details, and other empty fields not provided by DOORS. The DOORS module name is: Signalling System Engineering Guidelines The DOORS baseline is: 0.22 The DOORS export date: 2020 04 07 Page: 3 of 199 ERTMS Signalling System Doc. No: ERP-30-S-00097 Programme Engineering Guidelines Rev: 16E Date: 07.04.2020 LIST OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 8 1.2 Purpose and scope ................................................................................................................ 9 1.3 Technical drawings in AutoCAD ............................................................................................ 9 1.4 Further work ........................................................................................................................... 9 1.5 How to use document ............................................................................................................ 9 1.6 English-Norwegian translations ........................................................................................... 11 1.7 Definitions ............................................................................................................................ 12 1.8 Change description .............................................................................................................. 13 2 MARKER BOARDS ...................................................................................................................... 17 2.1 General ................................................................................................................................ 17 2.2 Dimensions .......................................................................................................................... 17 2.3 Placing ................................................................................................................................. 18 2.3.1 Placement in tunnels ....................................................................................................... 22 2.3.2 Placement on fixed bridges ............................................................................................. 22 2.4 Boards at stations ................................................................................................................ 24 2.4.1 Signal E39: Stop for shunting board ............................................................................... 25 2.4.2 Entry marker board .......................................................................................................... 26 2.4.3 Exit marker board ............................................................................................................ 26 2.4.4 Inner marker boards ........................................................................................................ 27 2.5 Dead end tracks ................................................................................................................... 28 3 SHUNTING SIGNALS .................................................................................................................. 29 4 TRACK VACANCY PROVING ..................................................................................................... 31 4.1 Axle counter at signalling point ............................................................................................ 31 4.2 Points ................................................................................................................................... 32 4.3 Derailers ............................................................................................................................... 36 4.4 Diamond crossing ................................................................................................................ 36 4.5 Cross-over ........................................................................................................................... 37 4.6 Level crossing ...................................................................................................................... 38 4.7 Dead end tracks ................................................................................................................... 38 5 BALISES ....................................................................................................................................... 39 6 POINT MACHINES ....................................................................................................................... 40 6.1 Replacement of existing point machines ............................................................................. 40 6.2 Equipping of points .............................................................................................................. 41 6.2.1 Point with grade 1:9 ......................................................................................................... 41 6.2.2 Point with grade between 1:12 and 1:18.4 ...................................................................... 43 6.2.3 Point with grade 1:26.1 .................................................................................................... 44 6.2.4 Single and double slip diamond crossing ........................................................................ 44 7 DERAILERS ................................................................................................................................. 45 8 MANUALLY OPERATED POINTS AND DERAILERS ................................................................. 46 9 KEY LOCK .................................................................................................................................... 47 10 LOCAL CONTROL PANEL FOR POINTS ................................................................................... 48 10.1 Criteria for local control panel for points .............................................................................. 48 11 CRANK CABINETS ...................................................................................................................... 48 12 LEVEL CROSSINGS .................................................................................................................... 49 12.1 Level crossing system ......................................................................................................... 51 12.1.1 Level crossing board ................................................................................................... 51 12.1.2 Road signal ................................................................................................................. 52 12.1.3 Acoustic signals .......................................................................................................... 53 12.1.4 Barrier ......................................................................................................................... 53 12.1.5 LX technical house ...................................................................................................... 54 Page: 4 of 199 ERTMS Signalling System Doc. No: ERP-30-S-00097 Programme Engineering Guidelines Rev: 16E Date: 07.04.2020 12.2 Warning lamp ....................................................................................................................... 54 13 AVALANCHE DETECTION .......................................................................................................... 55 14 TUNNEL GATES .......................................................................................................................... 56 15 MOVABLE BRIDGE ..................................................................................................................... 57 16 INFLUENCE ON OTHER DISCIPLINES...................................................................................... 58 17 TRAIN ROUTES ........................................................................................................................... 58 17.1 Flank protection ................................................................................................................... 60 17.1.1 Marker board for flank protection ................................................................................ 60 17.1.2 Point for flank protection ............................................................................................. 61 17.1.3 Derailer for flank protection ........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Llght Rall Translt Statlon Deslgn Guldellnes
    PORT AUTHORITY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT V.4.0 7/20/18 STATION DESIGN GUIDELINES ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Port Authority of Allegheny County (PAAC) provides public transportation throughout Pittsburgh and Allegheny County. The Authority’s 2,600 employees operate, maintain, and support bus, light rail, incline, and paratransit services for approximately 200,000 daily riders. Port Authority is currently focused on enacting several improvements to make service more efficient and easier to use. Numerous projects are either underway or in the planning stages, including implementation of smart card technology, real-time vehicle tracking, and on-street bus rapid transit. Port Authority is governed by an 11-member Board of Directors – unpaid volunteers who are appointed by the Allegheny County Executive, leaders from both parties in the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate, and the Governor of Pennsylvania. The Board holds monthly public meetings. Port Authority’s budget is funded by fare and advertising revenue, along with money from county, state, and federal sources. The Authority’s finances and operations are audited on a regular basis, both internally and by external agencies. Port Authority began serving the community in March 1964. The Authority was created in 1959 when the Pennsylvania Legislature authorized the consolidation of 33 private transit carriers, many of which were failing financially. The consolidation included the Pittsburgh Railways Company, along with 32 independent bus and inclined plane companies. By combining fare structures and centralizing operations, Port Authority established the first unified transit system in Allegheny County. Participants Port Authority of Allegheny County would like to thank agency partners for supporting the Light Rail Transportation Station Guidelines, as well as those who participated by dedicating their time and expertise.
    [Show full text]
  • Solent Connectivity May 2020
    Solent Connectivity May 2020 Continuous Modular Strategic Planning Page | 1 Page | 2 Table of Contents 1.0 Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 The Solent CMSP Study ................................................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Scope and Geography....................................................................................................................... 10 2.2 Fit with wider rail industry strategy ................................................................................................. 11 2.3 Governance and process .................................................................................................................. 12 3.0 Context and Strategic Questions ............................................................................................................ 15 3.1 Strategic Questions .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.2 Economic context ............................................................................................................................. 16 3.3 Travel patterns and changes over time ............................................................................................ 18 3.4 Dual-city region aspirations and city to city connectivity ................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Urban Rail Development Handbook
    DEVELOPMENT THE “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook offers both planners and political decision makers a comprehensive view of one of the largest, if not the largest, investment a city can undertake: an urban rail system. The handbook properly recognizes that urban rail is only one part of a hierarchically integrated transport system, and it provides practical guidance on how urban rail projects can be implemented and operated RAIL URBAN THE URBAN RAIL in a multimodal way that maximizes benefits far beyond mobility. The handbook is a must-read for any person involved in the planning and decision making for an urban rail line.” —Arturo Ardila-Gómez, Global Lead, Urban Mobility and Lead Transport Economist, World Bank DEVELOPMENT “ The Urban Rail Development Handbook tackles the social and technical challenges of planning, designing, financing, procuring, constructing, and operating rail projects in urban areas. It is a great complement HANDBOOK to more technical publications on rail technology, infrastructure, and project delivery. This handbook provides practical advice for delivering urban megaprojects, taking account of their social, institutional, and economic context.” —Martha Lawrence, Lead, Railway Community of Practice and Senior Railway Specialist, World Bank HANDBOOK “ Among the many options a city can consider to improve access to opportunities and mobility, urban rail stands out by its potential impact, as well as its high cost. Getting it right is a complex and multifaceted challenge that this handbook addresses beautifully through an in-depth and practical sharing of hard lessons learned in planning, implementing, and operating such urban rail lines, while ensuring their transformational role for urban development.” —Gerald Ollivier, Lead, Transit-Oriented Development Community of Practice, World Bank “ Public transport, as the backbone of mobility in cities, supports more inclusive communities, economic development, higher standards of living and health, and active lifestyles of inhabitants, while improving air quality and liveability.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, the Republic of the Philippines
    Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014 Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines Final Report February 2015 Prepared for: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry Ernst & Young ShinNihon LLC Japan External Trade Organization Prepared by: TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. Japan Transportation Planning Association Reproduction Prohibited Preface This report shows the result of “Study on Economic Partnership Projects in Developing Countries in FY2014” prepared by the study group of TOSTEMS, Inc., Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd., Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Japan Transportation Planning Association for Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. This study “Study on Medium Capacity Transit System Project in Metro Manila, The Republic of The Philippines” was conducted to examine the feasibility of the project which construct the medium capacity transit system to approximately 18km route from Sta. Mesa area through Mandaluyong City, Ortigas CBD and reach to Taytay City with project cost of 150 billion Yen. The project aim to reduce traffic congestion, strengthen the east-west axis by installing track-guided transport system and form the railway network with connecting existing and planning lines. We hope this study will contribute to the project implementation, and will become helpful for the relevant parties. February 2015 TOSTEMS, Inc. Oriental Consultants Global Co., Ltd. Mitsubishi Heavy
    [Show full text]
  • Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01
    Division / Business Unit: Corporate Services & Safety Function: Signalling Document Type: Catalogue Approved Signalling Items for the ARTC Network ESA-00-01 Applicability ARTC Network Wide SMS Publication Requirement Internal / External Primary Source Existing ARTC Type Approvals Document Status Version # Date Reviewed Prepared by Reviewed by Endorsed Approved 1.3 03 May 2021 Standards Stakeholders Manager General Manager Signalling Technical Standards Standards 03/05/2021 Amendment Record Amendment Date Reviewed Clause Description of Amendment Version # 1.0 23 Mar 20 First issue of catalogue that lists signalling items and communication items related to signalling systems approved for use on the ARTC network. 1.1 26 Jun 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification 1.2 24 Nov 20 New approved items added based on type approval and compliance to ARTC specification © Australian Rail Track Corporation Limited (ARTC) Disclaimer This document has been prepared by ARTC for internal use and may not be relied on by any other party without ARTC’s prior written consent. Use of this document shall be subject to the terms of the relevant contract with ARTC. ARTC and its employees shall have no liability to unauthorised users of the information for any loss, damage, cost or expense incurred or arising by reason of an unauthorised user using or relying upon the information in this document, whether caused by error, negligence, omission or misrepresentation in this document. This document is uncontrolled when printed. Authorised users of this document should visit ARTC’s extranet (www.artc.com.au) to access the latest version of this document.
    [Show full text]
  • AS 7651 Axle Counters
    AS 7651:2020 Axle Counters Train Control Systems Standard Please note this is a RISSB Australian Standard® draft Document content exists for RISSB product development purposes only and should not be relied upon or considered as final published content. Any questions in relation to this document or RISSB’s accredited development process should be referred to RISSB. AS 7651:2020 RISSB Office Phone: AxleEmail: Counters Web: (07) 3724 0000 [email protected] www.rissb.com.au Overseas: +61 7 3724 0000 AS 7651 Assigned Standard Development Manager Name: Cris Fitzhardinge Phone: 0419 916 693 Email: [email protected] Draft for Public Comment AS 7651:2020 Axle Counters This Australian Standard® AS 7651 Axle Counters was prepared by a Rail Industry Safety and Standards Board (RISSB) Development Group consisting of representatives from the following organisations: Sydney Trains United Goninian Limited Queensland Rail Aldridge Transport for NSW Metro Trains Melbourne ARC Infrastructure Mott MacDonald Frauscher Australia Thales PTV Siemens PTA WA NJT Rail Services The Standard was approved by the Development Group and the Enter Standing Committee Standing Committee in Select SC approval date. On Select Board approval date the RISSB Board approved the Standard for release. Choose the type of review Development of the Standard was undertaken in accordance with RISSB’s accredited process. As part of the approval process, the Standing Committee verified that proper process was followed in developing the Standard RISSB wishes to acknowledge the positive contribution of subject matter experts in the development of this Standard. Their efforts ranged from membership of the Development Group through to individuals providing comment on a draft of the Standard during the open review.
    [Show full text]
  • COUNTINGWORLD the Customer Magazine for Axle Counter Systems 09.2018
    COUNTINGWORLD The Customer Magazine for Axle Counter Systems 09.2018 www.thalesgroup.com/germany CHALLENGING THE STATUS QUO LITECE™ PAVING THE WAY FOR SMART SENSING TECHNOLOGIES A RAILWAY ACROSS THE DESERT MOBILITY SOLUTIONS FOR THE TOUGHEST ENVIRONMENT ON THE PLANET THE “WARRIORS” CHOOSE THALES THALES FLAGSHIP AXLE COUNTER SYSTEM DEBUTS IN SAN FRANCISCO maintenance multiply? Is an increase in train In addition, finite element calculations and density justifiable when the operational cost simulation of environmental conditions are rises, but the number of passengers does not? suitable methodical instruments to get the basic It is, after all, the minimum level of safety required design right from the beginning. and affordable costs, i.e. the expected life cycle costs or investment costs, that determine Nothing replaces real life a supplier’s selection of signalling system or experience to confirm resilience product. and reliability Availability and punctuality become With the new Lite4ce™ smart sensor, Thales measurable decision criteria is introducing an entirely new concept of wheel sensing for Axle Counting Systems: an Neglected in contract award decisions in the unprecedented challenge for a track-based past due to a lack of success criteria, both signalling system – innovative and fascinating punctuality and availability are slowly becoming – but with limited ability to rely on decades of the evaluation pillars for performance-based operational experience. contracts. Fully redundant “2 out of 3” signalling system concepts have been on the signalling Lite4ce™ – at the forefront of Dear Readers, market for many years and have drastically sensor technology reduced if not mitigated the effects of single points RELIABILITY BY DESIGN of failures.
    [Show full text]
  • West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive Summary 9 1
    November 2010 West Midlands and Chilterns Route Utilisation Strategy Draft for Consultation Contents 3 Foreword 4 Executive summary 9 1. Background 11 2. Dimensions 20 3. Current capacity, demand, and delivery 59 4. Planned changes to infrastructure and services 72 5. Planning context and future demand 90 6. Gaps and options 149 7. Emerging strategy and longer-term vision 156 8. Stakeholder consultation 157 Appendix A 172 Appendix B 178 Glossary Foreword Regional economies rely on investment in transport infrastructure to sustain economic growth. With the nation’s finances severely constrained, between Birmingham and London Marylebone, as any future investment in transport infrastructure well as new journey opportunities between Oxford will have to demonstrate that it can deliver real and London. benefits for the economy, people’s quality of life, This RUS predicts that overall passenger demand in and the environment. the region will increase by 32 per cent over the next 10 This draft Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) sets years. While Network Rail’s Delivery Plan for Control out the priorities for rail investment in the West Period 4 will accommodate much of this demand up Midlands area and the Chiltern route between to 2019, this RUS does identify gaps and recommends Birmingham and London Marylebone for the next measures to address these. 30 years. We believe that the options recommended Where the RUS has identified requirements for can meet the increased demand forecast by this interventions to be made, it seeks to do so by making RUS for both passenger and freight markets and the most efficient use of capacity.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Route Strategic Plan Version 8.0: Delivery Plan Submission March 2019
    Western Route Strategic Plan Version 8.0: Delivery Plan submission March 2019 Western Route Strategic Plan Contents Foreword and summary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Route objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 10 Safety ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 14 Train performance .................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 19 Locally driven measures ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 24 Sustainability & asset management capability ....................................................................................................................................................................... 27 Financial performance ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Exposition Corridor Transit Project Phase 2 Final Environmental Impact Report Technical Background Report
    Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority Exposition Corridor Transit Project Phase 2 Final Environmental Impact Report Technical Background Report FINAL Hazards and Hazardous Materials December 2009 Prepared for: Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority By: ERRATA The Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (Expo Authority) has determined that the bike path and Second Street Santa Monica Terminus are no longer under consideration as part of the Expo Phase 2 Light-Rail Transit project. This Technical Background Report was drafted prior to the final definition of the LRT Alternatives that was presented in the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR). Accordingly, discussion of the bike path and Second Street Santa Monica Terminus still remain in this report but no longer apply and should be disregarded. Exposition Corridor Transit Project Phase 2 FINAL Hazards and Hazardous Materials Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Overview ............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Summary ................................................................................................ 1 1.2.1 No-Build Alternative ................................................................................. 1 1.2.2 Transportation Systems Management (TSM) Alternative ......................... 2 1.2.3 Light-Rail Transit (LRT) Alternatives .......................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Central West System Information Pack
    Queensland Rail does not warrant the fitness for purpose or accuracy of this information Central West System Information Pack Central West System Information Pack Version Information Version 3.0: 05/10/2016 • Removed Winton to Hughenden sections • Removed Clermont to Blair Athol Junction sections • Removed Nogoa to Springsure sections • Updated References Queensland Rail Network to Queensland Rail • Updated References Queensland Transport to DTMR • Removed reference 2005 Access Undertaking • EPA changed to Department • Updated Standards references • Updated Line Diagrams • Updated Climate Information • Updated Rail System Electrification • Updated Track Grade • Updated Network Control Regions & Singalling Centres • Updated Safeworking Systems • Update Noise Management System Issue 3.0 – October 2016 Page 1 of 85 Queensland Rail does not warrant the fitness for purpose or accuracy of this information Central West System Information Pack Table of Contents Introduction ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 General Information ......................................................................................................................................... 5 General Climate - Queensland Wide ............................................................................................................... 6 Cyclones ...............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Signalling Circuit Design Standards SDS 25
    Discipline Engineering Standard –NSW Category Signalling Title Signalling Circuit Design Standards Reference Number SDS 25 –(RIC Standard: SC 00 14 00 00 SP) Document Control Status Date Prepared Reviewed Endorsed Approved GM Standards and Standards Infrastructure Safety Systems Engineer Strategy & Committee Issue 1 Mar 05 Performance Revision 2 Refer to Refer to minutes Reference H Olsen M Owens of meeting Number 12/08/04 Engineering Standard –NSW Signalling SDS 25 Signalling Circuit Design Standards DISCLAIMER Australian Rail Track Corporation has used its best endeavors to ensure that the content, layout and text of this document is accurate, complete and suitable for its stated purpose. It makes no warranties, express or implied, that compliance with the contents of this document shall be sufficient to ensure safe systems of work or operation. Australian Rail Track Corporation will not be liable to pay compensation in respect of the content or subsequent use of this document for any other purpose than its stated purpose or for any purpose other than that for which it was prepared except where it can be shown to have acted in bad faith or there has been willful default. DOCUMENT APPROVAL The technical content of this document has been approved by the relevant ARTC engineering authority and has also been endorsed by the ARTC Safety Committee. DOCUMENT SUPPLY and CONTROL The Primary Version of this document is the electronic version that is available and accessible on the Australian Rail Track Corporation Internet and Intranet website. It is the document user’s sole responsibility to ensure that copies are checked for currency against the Primary Version prior to its use.
    [Show full text]