DOCSLIB.ORG

A True and Exa<3 LIST

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A True and Exa<3 LIST A True and Exa<3 LIST OF THE M EMBERS of both Houfcs of this prefent CONVOCATION, Summon’d to meet on the Sixteenth Day of February, A. D. 1714, in the CHAPTER-HOUSE at St. Paul’s, and from thence adjourn’d to Henry the VIIJCHAPEL at Weftminfter, to the n6th Day of the feme Month. The 1$ A M E S of the Archbifhop and Bi/hops, Members of the UPPER HOUSE* Thomas, Lord Archbiihop of Canterbury. HN, LordBifhopof London. William, Lord Bifhop of Lincoln. ,11 Jonathan, Lord Bifhop of Wincheder. John, Lord Bifhop of Landaff. g William, Lord Bifhop of Worcester. Of spring. Lord Bifhop of Exeter. J Gilbert, Lord Bifhop of Sarum. Charles, Lord Bifhop of Norwich. John, Lord Bifhop of Lichfield and Coventry. William, Lord Bifhop of St. Afaph. John, Lord Bifhop of Ely. Thomas, Lord Bifhop of Chichefler. Richard, Lord Bifhop of Peterborough. Philip, Lord Bifhop of Hereford. Edward, Lord Bifhop of Gloucefler. Adam, Lord Bifhop, of St. David's. William, Lord Bifliop of Oxford. Francis, Lord Bifhop of Rochefier. John, Lord Bifhop of Bangor. George, Lord Bifhop of Brifiol. George, Lord Bifhop of Bath and Wells. The Names of the Members of the LOWER HOUSE, Canterbury ptftrbojcugy j&bjfcricb* GEorge Stanhope, D. D. Dean of Canterbury. White Kennet, D. D. Dean of Peterborough. Humphry Prideaux, D. D. Dean of Norwich. P ROLOCU TOR. Richard Cumberland, A, M. Archd. of Northampton. John Jeffery, D.D. C Norwich. Thomas'Green, D. D. Archd. of Canterbury. Richard Reynolds, L. L* D. Prodfor for the Chapter. Robert Cannon, D.D. /Axc\\d.\Norfolk. William Higden, D. D. Prodfor for the Chapter. Edward Maynard, D. D.l ^ * c ^ ^ Humphry Prideaux, D.D. C of y Suffolk. Pr0<aors for the Cler Pro<aorsfor the Cler John Dolhex, A. M. f gy- Nicolas Clagett, D.D. A CSudbury. A. M. } sy- (Sloutelftr* George Martin, A. M. Prodfor for the Chapter. Knightly Chetwood, D, D. Dean of Gloucefter. 3tonium. John Whitefoot, A. M. X Prodtors for the Robert Parfons, A. M. Archd. of Gloucefter. Henry Godolphin, D. D. Dean of St Paul's. Samuel Crifp, A. M. > Clergy. RichardBlechinden,LiL. D. Prodfor for the Chapter. 'William Stanley, D. D. ^ London. £Ifapy Bernard Gardiner, L. L. D / Prodfors for the >William Lancafier, D. D. Middlefox. William Stanley, D.D. Dean of St. Afaph. Archd* Qhriftopher Baynes, A. M. ) Clergy. William, Ld. Bp. of St. Afaph, AxchA.oi St. Afaph 'Charles Aljlon, D. D. Ejfex._ John Davies, A. M. Prodfor for the Chapter. Jonas Warly, D. D. j of j Colchefter. George Ld Billiop of Briftol, Dean of Chrift Church. Robert Wynn, L. L. D. V Prodfors for the Lionel Gafford, D. D. j J St. Albans. Timothy Goodwin, A. M. Archd. of Oxford Maurice Vaughan, Clcr. T Clergy. .'Roger Alt ham, D. D. Prohor for the Chapter. Francis Gaftrell, D. D. Prodtor for the Chapter. William Bramflone, D. D. ? o c ^1 William Delaune, D. D. i Prodfors for the John Lord Bifhop of Landaff, Dean of Hereford. Thomas Btnnet, A. M jP^ors for the Clergy. Robert Freind, D. D. f Clergy. Thomas Fox, A. M. ? Archd. 1 Hereford. 'Bangoj* Robert Comyn, A. M. T of \ Salop. Erancis, Ld. Bp. of Rochefter, Dean of Weftminfier. John Jones, D. D. Dean of Banger. Daniel Philips, D. D. Prodfor for the Chapter. Robert South, D. D. Archdeacon of Weftminfter. y<?^,Ld.Bp.of Bangor,Archd. of Bangor & Anglefey Nicolas Only, D. D. Prodfor for the Chapter. Lancelot Bulkeley, B. D. Archd. of Merioneth. IdmoxTykrl D.' D. fPro£lors for the ClerS-v- ?Sltttcf)elfer. Robert Foulkes, A. M. Prodfor for the Chapter. Ctjtcbelfcr. Jbhn Wickart, D. D. Dean of Winchefter.- Robert Wynne, A* M* ^ Prodfors for the William Hay ley, D. D. Dean of Chichefter. (Ralph Brideoak, A. M. * 7 Archd. ^TWinton John Ell'u, A. M. J Clergy. James Barker, A. M- 7 Archd. J Chichefter. Edmond Gibfon, D. D. J of y Surry. f3aff) and Richard Bowchier, B. D- j of Lewes* Thomas Newey, D* D. Prodtor for the Chapter. Matthew *Rrailsford, D. D. Dean of Wells. John Wright) A. M Prodfor for the Chapter. Anthony Aljop, B. D. J Prodtors far the Samuel Hill, A. M. ") , Wells. John forandorge, D.’ D. -j Prodfors for the Samuel Edgley, A. M. [ Clergy. Edmond Archer, D. D. > Archd. Taunton. William Whit ear. A. MS Clergy. William Hunt, A. Ns. J ' jBath. iDabto’s. "William Lord Bifhop ol Oxford, Dean of Worcefter. Henry Layng,X>. D. Prodfor- for the Chapter. Hugh Powell, A. M. Precentor. William Worth, B. D. Archdeacon of Worcefter. Thomas Coney, D. D. ) Prodfors for the John Medley, A. M. ^ f St. David's. Edward Chandler, D. D. Prodfor for the Chapter. Thomas Naifh, A. M. L Clergy. Edward Tenifon, L. L. V>.[ . , , fSCaermarthei William Lloyd, D. D. / Prodtors for the Eltncoln. r yLardigan. James Stillingfleet, A. M. j Clergy. Richard Willis, D. D. Dean ot^Lincoln. Jdfhua Stephens, A- M> j ( Brecknock. Salisbury John Mandevile, D. D. '-'Lincoln. William Needham, B.D. Chancellour. 1 ^ro<^ors John Tounger, D. D. Dean of Salisbury. John Geery, L. L. D. I \Bucks. Alexander Ford, D. D. > Richard Weft, D. D. , , p Berks. 0 Lawrence Echard, A. M. \Archd. JStow. Edward Cut biert, S rjUy. Cornelius Jeate, A. M. C A rend. CeFilts. White Kennet, D. D. f of \Huntingdon. Edward Gwin, A. M. -1 Prodtors for the John Hoadly, A. M. j °f jSalisbury. John Rogers, A. M. \ j Leicefter. Rice Howell, A>M. -> Clergy. Thomas Coker, A. M. Prodtor for the Chapter. Thomas Frank. A. M. J ^-Bedford. Horbcfttr. Edward Jones, A. M. / D /x r John Inett, D. D. \ Prodfors for the Chapter, Samuel Prat, D. D. Dean of Rochefter. r0iaorsfor the CIer Bohun Fox, L. L. B. r gy- ' John Mandevile, D. D.J jointly and feverally. Thomas Sprat, A. M. Archd. of Rochefter. and Cobentrr* Richard Knowles, A. M. :> Prodtors for the' Richard Bletchinden, L. L. D. Prodfors for th Jonathan Kimberly, D. D. Dean of Lichfield. John Laughton, A. M. > Clergy. ' And Chapter, jointl Nathanael El if on, D. D. A C Stafford. Lantaff. Thomas Sprat, A- M. and feverally. Thomas Goodwyn, D. D. f Archd. j Derby. John, Ld. Bp. of Landaff, Dean of Landaff. William Savage, B. DA 7_ Prodtors for th William Wilfon, A. M. C of J Coventry. WilliamWatts, B.D. Archd. of Landaff. Harrington Bag/haw, A. M. j Clergy. Griffith Vaughan, A. IA. J (- Salop. Thomas Willis, A. M. Prodtor for the Chapter. S&tftoL Edward Maynard, D. D. Precentor, !^r ^ James Harris, B'D' Xr, o r t. The Hon. Rob. Booth, D. D. Dean of Briftol. William Lewis, /Pro^ors ^ the Clergy. Robert Cow per, A. M. Archd. of Dorfet. Edmond Ryves, D. D. J Prodfors for the Prefer. Charles Livefay, ^4. Af. Prodtor for the Chapter. Henry Felton, D. D. y Clergy. Lancelot Blackburns, A. M. Dean of Exeter. John StevenJon, A. M.\ Prodtors for the Cly Edward Drew, A. M. Archd. of Cornwall. Thomas Diblen, A. M.^ Clergy. Robert Mofs, D. D. Dean of Ely.! Nicolas Kendall, A.M. Archd. of Totnefs. SISUnDfo? ant) S2tooltJerl;am|;tcn. Richard BentleyfD.D. Archd. of Ely. Thomas Linford, D.D. Archd. of Barnftaple. The Right Hon. George, Ld. Willoughby de Broo Charles Afbton, D. D. Prodtor for the Chapter. Peter Foulkes, D.D. Prodtor for the Chapter. D. D. Dean of Windfor.» John Cory, B. D. Prodtors for the Carolus Pole, L LB. s Prodtors for the John P Urn ley, A. M. Prodtor for the Chapter. William Lunn, A. M. Clergy. William Roberts, A. M. J Clergy. THO. ROUS, Cler. Dom, Infer. Convoca London, Printed by W. S. for Richard Wilkin, at the Kings Head in St. Vauh Church-Tard. MDDCXIV. (Price Four Pence.) A Vindication of the Church of England from the Afperfions of a late Libel, intitutled, Prieftcraft in PerfeEiicn, 8rc. Wherein the"controverted CJaufe of the Church’s Fewer in 1 X torted the upon XXth, their Article,^ Accufers. is /hewnWith to a bePreface of Equal containing Authority fome with Remarks all the uponreft of the the Reflexions Articles on: and that the Pamphlet. Fraud and ByForgery a Prieft charg’d of the upon Church the ofClergy England. on the Account of that Ciaufe are re- *** An Anfwer to J. O-’s Arguments for Ordination by Presbyters without Biftiops, By Jo. Thomas, A* M. Redtor of PcucgiPewgoes in Montgomery ft ire. Rccc amended by the Re- verend Dr. George Hicks. Both Printed for Riehard Wilkin. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Download 1 File
    GHT tie 17, United States Code) r reproductions of copyrighted Ttain conditions. In addition, the works by means of various ents, and proclamations. iw, libraries and archives are reproduction. One of these 3r reproduction is not to be "used :holarship, or research." If a user opy or reproduction for purposes able for copyright infringement. to accept a copying order if, in its involve violation of copyright law. CTbc Minivers U^ of Cbicatjo Hibrcmes LIGHTFOOT OF DURHAM LONDON Cambridge University Press FETTER LANE NEW YORK TORONTO BOMBAY CALCUTTA MADRAS Macmillan TOKYO Maruzen Company Ltd All rights reserved Phot. Russell BISHOP LIGHTFOOT IN 1879 LIGHTFOOT OF DURHAM Memories and Appreciations Collected and Edited by GEORGE R. D.D. EDEN,M Fellow Pembroke Honorary of College, Cambridge formerly Bishop of Wakefield and F. C. MACDONALD, M.A., O.B.E. Honorary Canon of Durham Cathedral Rector of Ptirleigb CAMBRIDGE AT THE UNIVERSITY PRESS 1933 First edition, September 1932 Reprinted December 1932 February PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN 1037999 IN PIAM MEMORIAM PATRIS IN DEO HONORATISSIMI AMANTISSIMI DESIDERATISSIMI SCHEDULAS HAS QUALESCUNQUE ANNOS POST QUADRAGINTA FILII QUOS VOCITABAT DOMUS SUAE IMPAR TRIBUTUM DD BISHOP LIGHTFOOT S BOOKPLATE This shews the Bishop's own coat of arms impaled^ with those of the See, and the Mitre set in a Coronet, indicating the Palatinate dignity of Durham. Though the Bookplate is not the Episcopal seal its shape recalls the following extract from Fuller's Church 5 : ense History (iv. 103) 'Dunelmia sola, judicat et stola. "The Bishop whereof was a Palatine, or Secular Prince, and his seal in form resembleth Royalty in the roundness thereof and is not oval, the badge of plain Episcopacy." CONTENTS .
    [Show full text]
  • Choral Evensong with the the Installation of the Revd Rosie Austin the Revd James Grier and the Revd Deborah Parsons As Prebendaries
    Choral Evensong with the The Installation of The Revd Rosie Austin The Revd James Grier and The Revd Deborah Parsons as Prebendaries Sunday 11 October 2020 4pm The Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity Robert Bishop of Exeter Welcome to the Cathedral We at Exeter Cathedral are delighted to host this service of installation for Rosie Austin, James Grier and Deborah Parsons. We welcome them and their families. As members of the College of Canons, they will contribute to the life of the Cathedral and its governance, and promote the mission and service of the Church in the Diocese. As members of the College of Canons, they receive the Cathedral’s annual report and accounts, discuss matters concerning the Cathedral, and give advice or counsel as requested by the Bishop or Chapter. The Cathedral Church of St. Peter in Exeter, founded in 1050, has been the seat (cathedra) of the bishop of Exeter, the symbol of his spiritual and teaching authority, for nearly 1000 years. As such the Cathedral is a centre of worship and mission for the whole of Devon. A centuries-old pattern of daily worship continues, sustained by the best of the Anglican choral tradition. The cathedral is a place of outreach, learning, and spirituality, inviting people into a richer and more engaged discipleship. The Cathedral is a destination for many pilgrims and visitors who come from near and far, drawn by the physical and spiritual heritage of this place. Exeter Cathedral belongs to all the people of Devon, and we warmly welcome you here. COVID-19: Infection Control Face Coverings in the cathedral As of 8 August 2020, wearing face coverings in places of worship is now mandatory.
    [Show full text]
  • The Forgotten Origins of the Ecumenical Movement in England: the Grindelwald Conferences, 1892-95
    Wright State University CORE Scholar History Faculty Publications History 3-2001 The orF gotten Origins of the Ecumenical Movement in England: The Grindelwald Conferences, 1892-95 Christopher Oldstone-Moore Wright State University - Main Campus, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history Part of the History Commons Repository Citation Oldstone-Moore, C. (2001). The orF gotten Origins of the Ecumenical Movement in England: The Grindelwald Conferences, 1892-95. Church History: Studies in Christianity and Culture, 70 (1), 73-97. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/history/250 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], library- [email protected]. The Forgotten Origins of the Ecumenical Movement in England: The Grindelwald Conferences, 1892-95 CHRISTOPHER 0LDSTONE-MOORE Ruth Rouse, wntmg in A History of the Ecumenical Movement, made an extraordinary claim about the origins of modern ecumenism. She identified two factors in the 1890s that, m her words, "changed the course of Church history and made possible tht· modern ecumenical movement."1 One was the Student Christian Movement, established m 1895 by the American Methodist layman, John R. Mott. The other factor was the Grmdelwald (Switzerland) Reunion Conferences, an assembly
    [Show full text]
  • Founder and First Organising Secretary of the Workers' Educational Association; 1893-1952, N.D
    British Library: Western Manuscripts MANSBRIDGE PAPERS Correspondence and papers of Albert Mansbridge (b.1876, d.1952), founder and first organising secretary of the Workers' Educational Association; 1893-1952, n.d. Partly copies. Partly... (1893-1952) (Add MS 65195-65368) Table of Contents MANSBRIDGE PAPERS Correspondence and papers of Albert Mansbridge (b.1876, d.1952), founder and first organising secretary of the Workers' Educational Association; 1893–1952, n.d. Partly copies. Partly... (1893–1952) Key Details........................................................................................................................................ 1 Provenance........................................................................................................................................ 1 Add MS 65195–65251 A. PAPERS OF INSTITUTIONS, ORGANISATIONS AND COMMITTEES. ([1903–196 2 Add MS 65252–65263 B. SPECIAL CORRESPONDENCE. 65252–65263. MANSBRIDGE PAPERS. Vols. LVIII–LXIX. Letters from (mostly prominent)........................................................................................ 33 Add MS 65264–65287 C. GENERAL CORRESPONDENCE. 65264–65287. MANSBRIDGE PAPERS. Vols. LXX–XCIII. General correspondence; 1894–1952,................................................................................. 56 Add MS 65288–65303 D. FAMILY PAPERS. ([1902–1955]).................................................................... 65 Add MS 65304–65362 E. SCRAPBOOKS, NOTEBOOKS AND COLLECTIONS RELATING TO PUBLICATIONS AND LECTURES, ETC. ([1894–1955]).........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • DISPENSATION and ECONOMY in the Law Governing the Church Of
    DISPENSATION AND ECONOMY in the law governing the Church of England William Adam Dissertation submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy of the University of Wales Cardiff Law School 2009 UMI Number: U585252 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U585252 Published by ProQuest LLC 2013. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 CONTENTS SUMMARY............................................................................................................................................................IV ACKNOWLEDGMENTS..................................................................................................................................VI ABBREVIATIONS............................................................................................................................................VII TABLE OF STATUTES AND MEASURES............................................................................................ VIII U K A c t s o f P a r l i a m e n
    [Show full text]
  • Great War Memorial Window
    St James the Less Parish Church West Teignmouth Great War Memorial Window - 2 - Contents Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 3 Preface......................................................................................................................................... 5 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 7 From the Teignmouth Post 1920................................................................................................. 8 THE FALLEN (1914-1918) ..................................................................................................... 13 Some Individual Accounts........................................................................................................ 25 William Barge of Teignmouth (O/N J124(Dev)).................................................................. 25 The Hamlyn Family.............................................................................................................. 27 The West Family in 1915...................................................................................................... 28 Charles Young ...................................................................................................................... 30 100 years on - Memorial Service 2014..................................................................................... 31 The Memorial
    [Show full text]
  • The Anglophone Toponyms Associated with John Smith's <I
    names, Vol. 57 No. 4, December, 2009, 189–207 The Anglophone Toponyms Associated with John Smith’s Description and Map of New England Matthew H Edney University of Southern Maine, USA This article clarifies a well-known but hitherto unexamined phenomenon: the Anglophone toponyms imposed on Captain John Smith’s map, New England ([1617]). It explains names that are otherwise obscure to modern historians and geographers, it considers the pattern of the new toponyms, and it allocates responsibility for the names not only to the future Charles I but also to Smith himself. It also lists the indigenous place and polity names recorded by Smith in his Description of New England (1616). It concludes with a cautionary tale concerning historiographic presumptions about the map’s efficacy in shaping the adoption of toponyms by subsequent English colonists. keywords Captain John Smith, Charles I (Great Britain), New England, Cartography, Colonization, Promotional propaganda Introduction Captain John Smith’s map New England (Figure 1) has long been famous for the manner in which its Anglophone toponyms were selected by the then fourteen-year- old future Charles I (Edney, 2010). Smith had developed the idea of a colony in 1614 when he had voyaged quickly down the east coast of northern Virginia from Mt Desert Island to Cape Cod; he called this putative colony New England by analogy to the Nova Albion previously declared by Sir Francis Drake on the west coast of North America. To promote this colony, he prepared both New England and a letterpress pamphlet, A Description of New England (Smith, 1616: 3).
    [Show full text]
  • The Norwich School of Lithotomy
    THE NORWICH SCHOOL OF LITHOTOMY by A. BATTY SHAW A NOTABLE cHAPTER in the long history of human bladder stone has been contributed from Norwich and its county of Norfolk and this came about for several reasons. The main reason was that Norfolk enjoyed the unenviable reputation during the latter part of the eighteenth and throughout the nineteenth centuries of having the highest incidence of bladder stone among its inhabitants of any county in Great Britain. As a result of thishigh prevalence ofbladderstone a local tradition of surgical skill in the art of lithotomy emerged and when the first general hospital in Norfolk, the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital was founded in 1771-2 there were appointed to its surgical staff local surgeons who were most experienced lithotomists. Their skill was passed on to those who followed them and earned for the hospital a European reputation for its standards of lithotomy. Sir Astley Cooper" when at the height of his professional fame and influence in 1835 spoke of these standards as follows, 'the degree of success which is considered most correct [for lithotomy] is that taken from the results of the cases at the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital'.2 There were not only able lithotomists on the early staff of the Norfolk and Norwich Hospital but also physicians who wrote on the medical aspects of bladder stone with special reference to the problems of incidence and chemical analysis. These writings were based on the registers of admissions to the hospital which were kept from the hospital's inception. The keeping of a hospital register was an uncommon practice at the turn of the eighteenth century as is revealed by Alexander Marcet3 in a mono- graph on calculous disease of the urinary tract which he published in 1817.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-October-Cathedral-News-1.Pdf
    Cathedral News October 2017 – No. 667 From the Acting Dean On the 31 October 1517, Martin Luther published his 95 theses in the German town of Wittenberg. His action is regarded as the start of the Reformation period across Europe. During the early part of the 15th century, many in the Catholic Church began criticising its activities. Luther was a leader of that movement, insisting that every Christian had a direct relationship with God. There was no need of the large superstructure of the Catholic Church to administer the grace of God; it was wrong to think that salvation was achieved through good works or the buying of ‘indulgences’. Salvation was God’s to give freely to those who accepted, and put their faith, in Jesus Christ. An understanding of God comes directly from the Bible, not the institutional church, so the Bible should be accessible to everyone by translating it into their native language. The ripple effect of the changes started by this debate, initiated by Luther continues to this day. The Reformation removed much of the role of the church as an autonomous and secular power. Many areas of welfare provision were taken over by the secular state. The Bible in England was translated from Latin, and the Prayer Book created. There was considerable resistance to the requirement to use English in worship. In the West Country, some Cornish and Devonians rose up in protest. They were brutally repressed. Luther’s theses, written in Latin, were quickly translated into German. Then, thanks to the invention of the printing press, they were widely distributed, and a social movement for radical change based on the Bible began, which has lasted in different forms ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • 258 SOCIAL STATUS of the OLE ROT in the April the Social Status
    258 SOCIAL STATUS OF THE OLE ROT IN THE April The Social Status of the Clergy in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries THBBE has already been much discussion of the passage in which Lord Macaulay some seventy years ago described the social position occupied by the clergy of the church of England in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. He wrote that when the Downloaded from church lost its old wealth and splendour at the Reformation, the sacerdotal office lost its attraction for the higher classes. During the century which followed the accession of Elizabeth scarce a single person of noble descent took Orders. At the close of the reign of Charles II two sons of peers were bishops ; four or five sons of peers were priests, and held http://ehr.oxfordjournals.org/ valuable preferments; but these rare exceptions did not take away the reproach which lay on the body. The clergy were regarded, on the whole, as a plebeian class ; and, indeed, for one who made the figure of a gentle- man, ten were mere menial servants.1 It was of this passage that Mr. Gladstone wrote: Few portions of his brilliant work have achieved a more successful notoriety. It may perhaps be said to have been stereotyped in the common English at University of California, San Francisco on March 6, 2015 mind. It is, in its general result, highly disparaging, and yet that genera- tion of clergy was, as we conceive, the most powerful and famous in the annals of the English Church. If we do not include yet earlier times, it is from want of record, rather than from fear of comparison.2 Recent historians 8 of the church of England have concurred in Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses The constitution and the clergy op Beverley minster in the middle ages McDermid, R. T. W. How to cite: McDermid, R. T. W. (1980) The constitution and the clergy op Beverley minster in the middle ages, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/7616/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk II BEVERIEY MINSTER FROM THE SOUTH Three main phases of building are visible: from the East End up to, and including, the main transepts, thirteenth century (commenced c.1230); the nave, fourteenth century (commenced 1308); the West Front, first half of the fifteenth century. The whole was thus complete by 1450. iPBE CONSTIOOTION AED THE CLERGY OP BEVERLEY MINSTER IN THE MIDDLE AGES. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. No quotation from it should be pubHshed without his prior written consent and information derived from it should be acknowledged.
    [Show full text]
  • William Peckitt's Great West Window at Exeter Cathedral
    WILLIAM PECKITT’S GREAT WEST WINDOW AT EXETER CATHEDRAL C S Atkinson A thesis submitted to the University of Plymouth In partial fulfilment for the degree of MASTER OF PHILOSOPHY October 2011 i Copyright This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. All photographs are by the author, unless otherwise stated All quotations, pictures and images have been utilised under the Fair Dealing for review principle of the UK Copyright, Design and Patents Act 1988. Additionally, every attempt has been made to identify and obtain direct permission to use pictures and images that are not my own property. ii Abstract This thesis examines the Great West Window at Exeter Cathedral designed by William Peckitt of York (1731-95). Peckitt was arguably the most important glass designer of the eighteenth century and undertook prestigious commissions at York, Oxford and elsewhere. In 1764 he was contracted by the Dean of Exeter, Jeremiah Milles, to supply glass to complete the restoration of the Cathedral’s glazing and to make the new window, which has often been considered to be his masterpiece. Peckitt’s Great West Window is no longer extant (although portions of it have been salvaged), having been replaced in 1904 with a window, designed by Messrs Burlison and Grylls, which was itself destroyed by enemy action in 1942. The Burlison and Grylls window was more in keeping with the Gothic revival aesthetic typical of the later nineteenth century and its proponents had argued forcefully that Peckitt’s Great West Window was an aberration that needed to be removed.
    [Show full text]