Viewed As a Threat to Himself and to the Crown

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Viewed As a Threat to Himself and to the Crown ! MIAMI UNIVERSITY The Graduate School Certificate for Approving the Dissertation We hereby approve the Dissertation of Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Candidate for the Degree: Doctor of Philosophy _______________________________________ Director Dr. Judith P. Zinsser ______________________________________ Reader Dr. Renee Baernstein _______________________________________ Reader Dr. Charlotte Goldy ______________________________________ Reader Dr. Stephen Norris _______________________________________ Graduate School Representative Dr. Katharine Gillespie ! ! ABSTRACT BY NO ORDINARY PROCESS: TREASON, GENDER, AND POLITICS UNDER HENRY VIII by Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Using the treason statute of 1534 and the Pole/Courtenay treason case of 1538, I explore how the intersection of treason, gender, and personal politics subverted and then changed the gender paradigm for traitors in the sixteenth century. The Poles and Courtenays were descended from the Plantagenets, the ruling dynasty in England before the Tudors, and as such were a threat to Henry VIII and the stability of his throne. After one member of the Pole family, Cardinal Reginald Pole, was declared a traitor by the king, Henry VIII and his principal minister, Thomas Cromwell, embarked upon an investigation of his family and friends. What they found convinced them that these two families were guilty of high treason and planning to replace him on the throne. The Pole/ Courtenay case shows the instability of customary gender assumptions both in English politics and the legislation and prosecution of treason. Though the process of the investigation, prosecution, and sentencing, the state changed what it meant to be a traitor in terms of gender. ! ! BY NO ORDINARY PROCESS: TREASON, GENDER, AND POLITICS UNDER HENRY VIII A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of Miami University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History by Sarah Elizabeth Donelson Miami University Oxford, Ohio 2012 Dissertation Director: Dr. Judith P. Zinsser ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! © Sarah Elizabeth Donelson 2012 ! ! TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Historiography 12 3. The Development of Treason Laws and Earlier Treasonous Women: Elizabeth Barton, Anne Boleyn, and Margaret Cheyne 31 4. Two Noble Families of Henry VIII’s England 54 5. The Royal Hunt for Reginald Pole 71 6. The Autumn of 1538 and Case against the White Party 89 ! #$!The Aftermath: Trials, Sentences, and Executions 124 8. Conclusion 148 9. Bibliography 155 10. Appendix A: People Index 168 11. Appendix B: Interrogation Timeline 172 """! ! ! ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As with any project, this dissertation owes its existence to the help and guidance of many people. My thanks to Mary Robertson at the Huntington Library and Hilda L. Smith at the University of Cincinnati for the invaluable suggestions and advice. I am grateful to Janice Liedl at Laurentian University whose emails were both encouraging and thought-provoking, as well as for allowing me to cite her conference paper. Thank you also to Amy Erickson at the University of Cambridge for the tea and conversation. The staff at the United Kingdom National Archives, the British Library, and the Devon Record Office were so helpful and I owe them a debt of thanks for assisting an overwhelmed graduate student with guidance, locating the documents and the occasional microfilm reader and camera maintenance. Without travel grants from Miami University Department of History, this project would not have been possible and so I am grateful to the Department and Jeri Schaner, in particular, for guiding me through the intricacies of bureaucratic and administrative duties. This dissertation is a very different and much improved work than it was at its inception. This is due to the diligence and assistance from a great number of people. First, my theories were tested and enriched by supportive and helpful panels at two separate conferences, the Berkshire Conference of Women Historians in June 2008 and the Rethinking Politics in Sixteenth-Century England conference in April 2009. Second, my dissertation committee’s careful consideration and close reading made this project much stronger. I am thankful to Renée Baernstein, Katharine Gillespie, Charlotte N. Goldy, and Stephen Norris for their comments, suggestions, and edits. A very relieved thank you to my copyeditor, Abby Love Smith, whose patience, knowledge, and meticulous attention to detail saved this dissertation’s punctuation and footnotes from its author. Finally, to the group of people without whose encouragement, support, and help I would not have a dissertation, I express my deepest gratitude. A special thanks goes to my advisor, Judith P. Zinsser, for the years of encouragement, patience, and hard work. She never doubted that I would get this done and was unfailingly supportive and good humored. Along with her partner, Roger Millar, she opened their home to me and devoted much of her free and non-free time to this dissertation. Thank you to my in-laws, Jackie and Pat Ambuske, for the hours of babysitting and understanding as I disappeared at holidays to work. To my parents, Susan and David Donelson, who have supported and encouraged me my whole life, an immense debt of thanks, in particular to my mother who has given up months of her time to babysit so that I could finish. Without the support, encouragement, and love of my husband Jim Ambuske and daughter Eleanor, none of this would be possible. From library errands to helping me work out problems with research and argument, to cooking dinner so I could spend time with our daughter who has never known a time when she did not have to share me with a dissertation, Jim has helped me in innumerable ways. I will always be deeply grateful to Jim and Eleanor both and it is to them that I dedicate this dissertation. "%! ! ! Chapter One: Introduction In May of 1541, Henry VIII was planning to go north with his retinue to quell unrest and manage some of the after effects of the Pilgrimage of Grace, the northern rebellion of 1536-1537. It was a trip he had been delaying for four years, but in 1541 the king felt secure enough in his authority in the south to leave London and travel north. To that end, he had determined that any threat in the Tower of London must be eradicated. Charles de Marillac, Francis I’s representative in England, wrote to the French king and informed him that before Henry left, he had ordered the Tower to be cleared of prisoners either by execution or absolution.1 Given his proposed absence from London and his purpose for traveling north, Henry VIII wanted to prevent any of the prisoners from serving as inspiration for another insurrection. On May 27, Margaret Pole, the countess of Salisbury awoke early in the morning to the news that she would be executed for treason that day. She had been imprisoned for two and a half years since November 1538, first in a private manor, then in the Tower beginning in the spring of 1539, and she had become accustomed to her surroundings and daily routine. Expecting to be in the Tower for at least another year, she had recently asked the Privy Council for, and had received, a new “furred” nightgown and twelve other items of warm clothing from Queen Catherine’s own tailor. That they acquiesced to her request the month before her execution indicates that this decision to execute her was a hasty one.2 The two long years of imprisonment had not prepared the countess of Salisbury for such an abrupt decision. She was sixty-seven years old and frail after years in the drafty Tower lodgings and having survived her own attainder, imprisonment, and the execution of her son, friends, and servants. She had lived in the Lieutenant’s house surrounded by his family and servants and shared their daily lives despite her official status as a prisoner. One can imagine the scene. It was late May in London, early in the morning. It was usually overcast with a breeze coming off the Thames; not yet muggy and probably still cool as she left her quarters in the lieutenant’s house and walked the short distance to the block on the Tower green where she was to be killed. In a state of shock, the countess was likely escorted by Sir Edmund Walsingham, the Tower lieutenant who had been in charge of her care since 1539. The Tower was home to hundreds of people: officials, guards and their families, servants, the proprietors of the Tower tavern, and the priests at St. Peter Ad Vincula, the Tower church. Even early in the morning, there would have been a steady hum of noise and whirling of activity as these people went about their daily lives. A state execution was exceptional and worthy of interest and perhaps many stopped to watch the proceedings. Eustace Chapuys, ambassador for Henry VIII’s archenemy Holy Roman Emperor Charles V wrote to Mary of Hungary3 that over one hundred and fifty people were witness to her execution, though Marrilac, perhaps referring !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! &!Charles de Marillac to Francis I quoted in Calendar of Letters and Papers Foreign and Domestic of the Reign of Henry VIII. Volumes 1-21. ed. J.S. Brewer, J. Gairdner, and R.H. Brodie (London: Vaduz Kraus Reprint: 1965), Volume XVI, no. 868. (Hereafter L&P)! '!British Library (hereafter BL) Arundel MS 97 f. 185; Sir Harris Nicholas, editor, Proceedings and Ordinances of the Privy Council of England Volume (London: Record Commission, 1837), 147; The National Archives of the UK SP1/140 ff. 219. (!Mary
Recommended publications
  • The Arms on the Chaucer Tomb at Ewelme with a Note on the Early Manorial History
    The Arms on the Chaucer Tomb at Ewelme with a note on the early manorial history . of the parish by E. A. GREENING LAMBORN ALTHOUGH representing one of the largest and most interesting collec­ ..r-\. tions of mediaeval coats to be found on any tomb in England, the arms on the Chaucer tomb at Ewelme have never been competently examined, so that the persons represented by them have been only partially, and sometimes incorrectly, identified. The most recent account of them, in the otherwise admirable notes on the church compiled by a late rector, is of little genealogical or heraldic value; and the account in the first volume of the Oxford Journal of Monumental Brasses is of no value at all : , Others to some faint meaning make pretence But Shadwell never deviates into sense.' its author's competence may be judged by his description of ' time-honoured Lancaster' as ' the Duke of Gaunt.' Sir Harris Nicolas, who wrote the Memoir prefixed to the Aldine Chaucer of 1845, realised that the solution of the problem was the construction of a pedigree; but the tree he drew up was quite inade­ quate for the purpose. The earliest record of the coats is in the notebook of Richard Lee, Port­ cullis, who sketched them for his Gatherings of Oxfordshire on his Visitation of the County in 1574. It is now in the Bodleian (Wood MS. D. 14), and a page of it, showing some of the shields on the Ewelme tombs, was reproduced in facsimile in the Harleian Society'S volume of the Visitations of Oxfordshire.
    [Show full text]
  • War of Roses: a House Divided
    Stanford Model United Nations Conference 2014 War of Roses: A House Divided Chairs: Teo Lamiot, Gabrielle Rhoades Assistant Chair: Alyssa Liew Crisis Director: Sofia Filippa Table of Contents Letters from the Chairs………………………………………………………………… 2 Letter from the Crisis Director………………………………………………………… 4 Introduction to the Committee…………………………………………………………. 5 History and Context……………………………………………………………………. 5 Characters……………………………………………………………………………….. 7 Topics on General Conference Agenda…………………………………..……………. 9 Family Tree ………………………………………………………………..……………. 12 Special Committee Rules……………………………………………………………….. 13 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………. 14 Letters from the Chairs Dear Delegates, My name is Gabrielle Rhoades, and it is my distinct pleasure to welcome you to the Stanford Model United Nations Conference (SMUNC) 2014 as members of the The Wars of the Roses: A House Divided Joint Crisis Committee! As your Wars of the Roses chairs, Teo Lamiot and I have been working hard with our crisis director, Sofia Filippa, and SMUNC Secretariat members to make this conference the best yet. If you have attended SMUNC before, I promise that this year will be even more full of surprise and intrigue than your last conference; if you are a newcomer, let me warn you of how intensely fun and challenging this conference will assuredly be. Regardless of how you arrive, you will all leave better delegates and hopefully with a reinvigorated love for Model UN. My own love for Model United Nations began when I co-chaired a committee for SMUNC (The Arab Spring), which was one of my very first experiences as a member of the Society for International Affairs at Stanford (the umbrella organization for the MUN team), and I thoroughly enjoyed it. Later that year, I joined the intercollegiate Model United Nations team.
    [Show full text]
  • Chertsey Abbey
    Chertsey Abbey Additional Resources This resource pack has been created for and by Chertsey Museum in partnership with Royal Holloway, University of London and The National Archives, funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council and the National Lottery Heritage Fund. Key to Slides Key Information and Terminology Resources and Activities Primary Sources Key Words • Monastery - An enclosed community of monks who lived and worked together. • Monk - A man who has given up all worldly possessions and devoted his life to serving God. • Abbey – the building/s occupied by a community of monks (or nuns). • Abbot – The man in charge of a community of monks. • Benedictine – A particular group of monks who followed the rule of St Benedict which was established in the 6th century. They wore black robes. Key Words • Dissolution – The act of formally ending or closing something. • Relic – The physical remains or personal belongings of a saint. Relics are believed to have mystical powers which allow for miracles. • Rule – The rules that govern the way of life for monks. • Commissioner – A senior official who is responsible for a certain task/investigation. • Hide – a unit of land measurement. • Villain – a person who is completely reliant on their lord. They have to seek permission to do anything and are required to give up part of their labour to their lord. Important Figures • St Erkenwold – Founder of Chertsey Abbey in 666. • John de Usk – abbot in the late 14th century. • John Cowdry – abbot in the 1530s. • Thomas Cromwell – Henry VIII’s key advisor in the lead up to the English Reformation and the Dissolution of the Monasteries.
    [Show full text]
  • ASIDES 1.5, SIX, Queens of the Castle Date: May 26, 2020 Featuring: Regina Buccola, Sara B.T
    ASIDES 1.5, SIX, Queens of the Castle Date: May 26, 2020 Featuring: Regina Buccola, Sara B.T. Thiel, Adrianna Hicks, Andrea Macasaet, Abby Mueller, Brittney Mack, Samantha Pauly, Anna Uzele The Ladies in Waiting: Julia Schade (Assistant Music Director, Conductor, Keyboard); Kimi Hayes (Guitars); Stacy McMichael (Electric Bass); Sarah Allen (Drums) Regina Buccola: Henry VIII had six wives. And if that weren’t astounding enough, he was married to the first one (at a time when we think of, you know, like very low life expectancy, dragons, etc.) — Catherine of Aragon — they were married for 24 years, and he went through the remaining five of his wives over the course of just eleven years, from 1536 until his death in 1547. Sara B.T. Thiel: Hello and welcome back to ASIDES from Chicago Shakespeare Theater. I’m Sara B.T. Thiel, Public Humanities Manager at CST. In the final episode in our first season of ASIDES—CST Scholar-in-Residence Dr. Regina Buccola takes a closer look at the true stories of Henry VIII’s six wives. This talk was recorded on May 21, 2019 as part of the Theater’s annual Scholar Luncheon. Gina Buccola is Professor of English and Chair of Humanities at Roosevelt University in Chicago, where she specializes in Shakespeare, non-Shakespearean early modern drama, and Women's and Gender Studies. When Gina was a PhD student at the University of Illinois, Chicago, she interned with the Education Department at Chicago Shakespeare, and has been a mainstay of CST adult education and teachers’ professional development programs ever since.
    [Show full text]
  • HENRY VII M.Elizabeth of York (R.1485–1509)
    Historic Royal Places – Descriptors Small Use Width 74mm Wide and less Minimum width to be used 50mm Depth 16.5mm (TOL ) Others Various Icon 7mm Wide Dotted line for scaling Rules 0.25pt and minimum size establishment only. Does not print. HENRY VII m.Elizabeth of York (r.1485–1509) Arthur, m. Katherine HENRY VIII m.(1) Katherine m.(2) Anne m.(3) Jane m.(4) Anne of Cleves Edmund (1) James IV, m Margaret m (2) Archibald Douglas, Elizabeth Mary Catherine Prince of Wales of Aragon* (r.1509–47) Boleyn Seymour (5) Catherine Howard King of Earl of Angus (d. 1502) (6) Kateryn Parr Scotland Frances Philip II, m. MARY I ELIZABETH I EDWARD VI Mary of m. James V, Margaret m. Matthew Stewart, Lady Jane Grey King of Spain (r.1553–58) (r.1558–1603) (r.1547–53) Lorraine King of Earl of Lennox (r.1553 for 9 days) Scotland (1) Francis II, m . Mary Queen of Scots m. (2) Henry, Charles, Earl of Lennox King of France Lord Darnley Arbella James I m. Anne of Denmark (VI Scotland r.1567–1625) (I England r.1603–1625) Henry (d.1612) CHARLES I (r.1625–49) Elizabeth m. Frederick, Elector Palatine m. Henrietta Maria CHARLES II (r.1660–85) Mary m. William II, (1) Anne Hyde m. JAMES II m. (2) Mary Beatrice of Modena Sophia m. Ernest Augustus, Elector of Hanover m.Catherine of Braganza Prince of Orange (r.1685–88) WILLIAM III m. MARY II (r.1689–94) ANNE (r.1702–14) James Edward, GEORGE I (r.1714–27) Other issue Prince of Orange m.
    [Show full text]
  • Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic Duane L
    Campbell Law Review Volume 32 Article 3 Issue 2 Winter 2010 January 2010 Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic Duane L. Ostler Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.campbell.edu/clr Part of the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Duane L. Ostler, Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic, 32 Campbell L. Rev. 227 (2010). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Campbell Law Review by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Repository @ Campbell University School of Law. Ostler: Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clau Bills of Attainder and the Formation of the American Takings Clause at the Founding of the Republic DUANE L. OSTLER* I. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 228 II. TAKINGS IN AMERICA PRIOR TO 1787 ....................... 228 A. Takings in the Colonies Prior to Independence ....... 228 B. The American Revolution and the Resulting State Constitutions ................................... 231 III. THE HISTORY BEHIND THE BAN ON BILLS OF ATTAINDER AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TAKINGS CLAUSE ................... 236 A. Events Leading to the Fifth Amendment .............. 236 B. Madison's Negative Opinion of a Bill of Rights ....... 239 C. Madison's Views on the Best Way to Protect Property Righ ts ................................................ 242 IV. SPECIFIED PROPERTY PROTECTIONS IN THE BODY OF THE CONSTITUTION .......................................... 246 A. Limits Specified in Article 1, Section 10 .............. 246 B. The Ban on Bills of Attainder .................... 248 V.
    [Show full text]
  • High Performance Stallions Standing Abroad
    High Performance Stallions Standing Abroad High Performance Stallions Standing Abroad An extract from the Irish Sport Horse Studbook Stallion Book The Irish Sport Horse Studbook is maintained by Horse Sport Ireland and the Northern Ireland Horse Board Horse Sport Ireland First Floor, Beech House, Millennium Park, Osberstown, Naas, Co. Kildare, Ireland Telephone: 045 850800. Int: +353 45 850800 Fax: 045 850850. Int: +353 45 850850 Email: [email protected] Website: www.horsesportireland.ie Northern Ireland Horse Board Office Suite, Meadows Equestrian Centre Embankment Road, Lurgan Co. Armagh, BT66 6NE, Northern Ireland Telephone: 028 38 343355 Fax: 028 38 325332 Email: [email protected] Website: www.nihorseboard.org Copyright © Horse Sport Ireland 2015 HIGH PERFORMANCE STALLIONS STANDING ABROAD INDEX OF APPROVED STALLIONS BY BREED HIGH PERFORMANCE RECOGNISED FOREIGN BREED STALLIONS & STALLIONS STALLIONS STANDING ABROAD & ACANTUS GK....................................4 APPROVED THROUGH AI ACTION BREAKER.............................4 BALLOON [GBR] .............................10 KROONGRAAF............................... 62 AIR JORDAN Z.................................. 5 CANABIS Z......................................18 LAGON DE L'ABBAYE..................... 63 ALLIGATOR FONTAINE..................... 6 CANTURO.......................................19 LANDJUWEEL ST. HUBERT ............ 64 AMARETTO DARCO ......................... 7 CASALL LA SILLA.............................22 LARINO.......................................... 66
    [Show full text]
  • Patriarchal Dynamics in Politics: How Anne Boleyn's Femininity Brought Her Power and Death
    John Carroll University Carroll Collected Senior Honors Projects Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects Spring 2018 Patriarchal Dynamics in Politics: How Anne Boleyn’s Femininity Brought her Power and Death Rebecca Ries-Roncalli John Carroll University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://collected.jcu.edu/honorspapers Part of the European History Commons Recommended Citation Ries-Roncalli, Rebecca, "Patriarchal Dynamics in Politics: How Anne Boleyn’s Femininity Brought her Power and Death" (2018). Senior Honors Projects. 111. https://collected.jcu.edu/honorspapers/111 This Honors Paper/Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Essays, and Senior Honors Projects at Carroll Collected. It has been accepted for inclusion in Senior Honors Projects by an authorized administrator of Carroll Collected. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Patriarchal Dynamics in Politics: How Anne Boleyn’s Femininity Brought her Power and Death Rebecca Ries-Roncalli Senior Honors Project May 2, 2018 Ries-Roncalli 1 I. Adding Dimension to an Elusive Character The figure of Anne Boleyn is one that looms large in history, controversial in her time and today. The second wife of King Henry VIII, she is most well-known for precipitating his break with the Catholic Church in order to marry her. Despite the tremendous efforts King Henry went to in order to marry Anne, a mere three years into their marriage, he sentenced her to death and immediately married another woman. Popular representations of her continue to exist, though most Anne Boleyns in modern depictions are figments of a cultural imagination.1 What is most telling about the way Anne is seen is not that there are so many opinions, but that throughout over 400 years of study, she remains an elusive character to pin down.
    [Show full text]
  • Toy (With) Animals Anna Noel Segner Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2019 Toy (with) animals Anna Noel Segner Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the Fine Arts Commons Recommended Citation Segner, Anna Noel, "Toy (with) animals" (2019). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 17098. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/17098 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Toy (with) animals by Anna Segner A thesis submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ARTS Major: Integrated Visual Arts Program of Study Committee: Barbara Walton, Major Professor Barbara Haas Emily Morgan Kim Moss The student author, whose presentation of the scholarship herein was approved by the program of study committee, is solely responsible for the content of this thesis. The Graduate College will ensure this thesis is globally accessible and will not permit alterations after a degree is conferred. Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2019 Copyright © Anna Segner, 2019. All rights reserved. ii Dedication To my mother, Patricia iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv ABSTRACT v CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. RESEARCH 6 CHAPTER 3. ART REVIEW 19 CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPMENT OF WORK 26 CHAPTER 5. CONCLUSION 49 CHAPTER 6. MFA THESIS EXHIBITION INSTALL 50 WORKS CITED 63 ADDENDIX.
    [Show full text]
  • The Northern Clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace Keith Altazin Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Altazin, Keith, "The northern clergy and the Pilgrimage of Grace" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 543. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/543 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. THE NORTHERN CLERGY AND THE PILGRIMAGE OF GRACE A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Keith Altazin B.S., Louisiana State University, 1978 M.A., Southeastern Louisiana University, 2003 August 2011 Acknowledgments The completion of this dissertation would have not been possible without the support, assistance, and encouragement of a number of people. First, I would like to thank the members of my doctoral committee who offered me great encouragement and support throughout the six years I spent in the graduate program. I would especially like thank Dr. Victor Stater for his support throughout my journey in the PhD program at LSU. From the moment I approached him with my ideas on the Pilgrimage of Grace, he has offered extremely helpful advice and constructive criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Catherine Howard, Henry's Fifth Wife, and How, After Ordering Her
    book 1, chapter 43 Of Catherine Howard, Henry’s Fifth Wife, and How, after Ordering Her Put to Death, He Married Katherine Parr1 Within eight days, the king married Catherine Howard, the duke of Norfolk’s niece (his brother’s daughter).2 But though the king was pleased beyond mea- sure with his new bride, that did not stop him from inflicting his cruelty on Catholics. Thus, on July 30, he put to death three saintly doctors of theology for having defended the cause of Queen Doña Catherine and for now denying the king’s pontifical power. Alongside them he condemned three Zwinglian heretics, ordering that they be paraded two by two, a Catholic together with a heretic, as a blacker mockery of religion and a worse torment to the Catholics, who received more pain from this awful company than from their own deaths. When a knight of the king’s household saw them borne off to death, com- panioned in this manner, and learned that some were condemned for being Catholics and the others for not being so, he said, “On this account I will take care henceforth to be of the king’s religion—that is to say, none at all!”3 Then, on August 2, he also dispatched the prior of Doncaster with three other monks and two laymen, on the same grounds, as well as for refusing to acknowledge the royal supremacy.4 1 Sander, De origine ac progressu, 214–19. 2 Henry and Catherine were married on June 28, 1540, several weeks after the finalization of the divorce from Anne.
    [Show full text]
  • Bessie Blount: Mistress to Henry VIII Free Ebook
    FREEBESSIE BLOUNT: MISTRESS TO HENRY VIII EBOOK Elizabeth Norton | 368 pages | 30 Nov 2013 | Amberley Publishing | 9781445613857 | English | Chalford, United Kingdom The Mistresses of Henry VIII Bessie Blount during the masque for the betrothal of Princess Mary to the dauphin of France () Mary, Henry VIII's first child, was not the desired male heir, she was still a valuable asset in the dynastic marriage and diplomatic power game. Who was Bessie Blount? Elizabeth, or ‘Bessie’, is the first woman who is known, with any certainty, to have been Henry’s mistress. She was born at Kinlet in Shropshire in around , making her just a teenager at the time she arrived at Henry’s court. Elizabeth Blount, known as Bessie, was Henry VIII’s mistress and mother of his illegitimate son, Henry Fitzroy. She is a subject of Elizabeth Norton’s meticulously researched biography Bessie Blount: The King's Mistress kindly sent to me by Amberley Publishing. Elizabeth ‘Bessie’ Blount – Mother of the King’s son Bessie Blount during the masque for the betrothal of Princess Mary to the dauphin of France () Mary, Henry VIII's first child, was not the desired male heir, she was still a valuable asset in the dynastic marriage and diplomatic power game. Elizabeth Blount (c. / c. / c. – /), commonly known during her lifetime as Bessie Blount, was a mistress of Henry VIII of England. King Henry VIII (ex-lover) Aragon and mistress of King Henry VIII, and the mother of his longed-for son Henry FitzRoy. Bessie is first seen in the first episode of the series, "In Cold Blood", and we see very clearly that she is Henry's mistress.
    [Show full text]