Archiv Für Naturgeschichte

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Archiv Für Naturgeschichte ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Archiv für Naturgeschichte Jahr/Year: 1902 Band/Volume: 68-2_3 Autor(en)/Author(s): Lucas Robert Artikel/Article: Protozoa, mit Ausschluss der Foraminifera, für 1896. 105-188 © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at Protozoa, mit Ausschluss der Foraminifera, für 1896. Von Dr. Robert Lucas in Rixdorf bei Berlin. A. Publikationen mit Referaten. Abel, R. Zur Färbung des Coccidium oviforme. Centralbl. f. Bakter. u. Paras. 20. Bd. I. p. 904—905. Die Cystenformen des Cocc. ovif. sind gross bis 40 fi 1., bis 25 // br., u. ungefärbt gut erkennbar, so dass eine Färbung überflüssig erscheint. Die vom Verf. vorgeschlagene Färbung ist aber 1. wunder- hübsch, zur Demonstration sehr geeignet u. 2. lässt sie vielleicht Rückschlüsse auf Bau u. Entwickl. der Coccidien zu. Färbung mit Carbolfuchsin unter Aufkochen, nachfolg. Entfärb, des Grundes u. der Körpergewebe mit 5 % Schwefelsäure u. 70 % Alkohol. Aivoli, Eriberto. Ricerche sui Blastomiceti nei Neoplasmi. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Parasitk. etc. 1. Abth. 20. Bd. p. 745—749. 1 kol. Taf. (V). Apstein, E. Das Süsswasserplankton. Methode und Resultate der quantitativen Untersuchung. Kiel und Leipzig (Lipsius u. Tischer) 1896. 8 0. (VI, 201 p.), 113 Abb., 5 Tab., M. 7,20. Umfasst die Resultate der Apstein'schen Untersuchungen über das Plankton des süssen "Wassers. Ebenso fasst es die Resultate der anderen Forscher zusammen. Es soll als Grundlage für weitere Studien u. als Anleitung zu weiteren selbständigen Arbeiten dienen. — Apstein's Untersuchungen erstrecken sich auf die Holsteinschen Seen der Probstei, sowie des Eider- u. Schwentinegebiets. — Auch Protozoen kommen in Betracht. — Vergl. das Ref. von F. Zschokke im: Zool.Centralbl. 3. Jhg. p. 764—769. — Auszug: Bull. Soc. Beige Micr. vol. XXII p. 199. Compt. rend. Aurivillius, C. W. S. Das Plankton des Baltischen Meeres. Bih. Svenska Akad. vol. XXI. Pt. IV. No. 8. Baccelli, G. La malaria. Policlinico. 1896. 15. maggio. Barbagallo - Rapisardi , P. siehe Casagrandi u. Barba- gallo-Rapisardi. ; © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at 106 XVin. Protozoa, mit Ausschluss der Foraminifera, für 1896. Austen, E. E. siehe B o r g e r t. Barrois, Th. Recherches sur la faune des eaux douces des A^ores. In: Mem. Soc. scienc. agric. arts Lille, ser. V, fasc. VI. 1896, 172 p. 3 cartes. — Ref. Zool. Centralbl. 3. Jhg. No. 18 p. 609—611. Der erste Hauptabschnitt, der die Fauna der Lagoas behandelt, bringt auch eine reiche Liste von Rhizopoden. — Bemerk, zur Ver- breitung etc. Berard, L. siehe Le Dantec u. Berard. Bcrgh, R. S. lieber Stützfasern in der Zellsubstanz einiger In- fusorien. Mit 1 Taf. Anat. Hefte (Merkel u. Bonnet) 1. Abth. 20. Hft. (7. Bd. l.Hft.) p. 103—112, 113. — Berichtigung, Zool. Anz. 19. Bd. No. 514, p. 425—426. Als Untersuchungsmaterial diente Spathidium spathula 0. F. Müll. Die Trichocysten (Maupas) an der Mundlippe fehlen; es handelt sich wahrscheinlich um die von Dujardin beschriebenen Pünktchen, die aber nur die Insertionsstellen von Stützfasern am Ectoplasma der Mundlippe sind. Anus u. contractile Vacuole terminal. Makronucleus lang, bandförmig; 6—9 Mikronuclei. Bewimperung allseitig, gleich- massig. Schlund fehlt. Von den Stützfasern (ganz starr, nicht con- tractu) inseriren viele an der Mundlippe, strahlen von hier bündel- weise nach hinten bis etwa an die Körpermitte u. setzen sich am Ecto- plasma an. Auch in der Gegend der contractilen Vakuole entspringen Bündel u. ziehen zum Ectoplasma der Körpermitte, wo übrigens einzelne Fasern schräg von einer Seite zur andern verlaufen. Die Lippenfasern u. die übrigen Fasern werden vom Wasser beim Zerfliessen des Thieres nicht gelöst u. durch Osmium- u. Pikrinsäure nicht zerstört letztere färbt sie nicht ; in 2 % iger Essigsäure lösen sie sich sofort. — Holophrya Emmae n. — Auch hier sind viele Fasern an der Mund- lippe befestigt, nach hinten, ein wenig divergirend. Von der Lippe geht nach hinten an der Ventralfläche ein Saum aus, von dem zahlreiche Faserbündel in's Innere hineinstrahlen. Besonders ganz vorn ent- springen die Fasern sehr dicht neben einander; ganz hinten verlaufen einige Bündel an den Seiten des Körpers. Alle Fasern erreichen höchstens V/3 der Körperlänge, nur ein Ende ders. ist am Ectoplasma befestigt, das andere endigt frei im Endoplasma. Beim Zerfhessen des Thieres im Wasser lassen sie sich gut isoliren. 2 % ige Essig- säure löst nur die Lippenfasern nicht. Die bei Späth, u. Hol. von den Lippen ausgehenden Fasern sind den Schlundstäbchen von Prorodon, Nassula u. s. w. ähnlich, aber weniger stark u. gut ausgebildet, — Nach Zool. Jahresber. (Neapel) 1896 p. 28. Beyerinck, M. W. 1896. Kulturversuche mit Amöben auf festem Substrate. Mit 1 Taf. Centralbl. f. Bakteriol. etc. 1. Abth. 19. Bd. No. 8 p. 257—267. — Ausz. v. F. Schaudinn, Zool. Centralbl. 3. Jhg. No. 20. p. 678—679. Amoeba nitrophila ist eine Erdamöbe ; auf Agarplatten mit Nitrit- ferment gezogen, auf denen auch ihre Nährorganismen, Bakterien ge- diehen. — Aehnliche Methode schon von Schaudinn angewendet zur Zucht von höheren Rhizopoden z. B. Foraminiferen [vergl. Zool. © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at XVin. Protozoa, mit. A\isschluss der Foraminifera, tui' 1896. 107 Centralbl. 3. Jhg. p. 678 in Anna.]. — Grösse: 15—20 /*. Plasma sehr hyalin. Zellkern sowie 2 Vakuolen, dar. 1 pulsirende, vorhanden. Fortpflanzung durch Zweitheilung. Bei der Vermehrung soll auch die pulsirende Vakuole sich theilen, desgl. (1 —3) Dauersporen innerhalb des Plasmas bilden. Sporenwand doppelt. Beobachtung des Aus- schlüpfens der Amöbe aus der Spore (in der feuchten Kammer be- obachtet. Vermehrung innerhalb der Spore fand nicht statt). — A. zymo- phile hat eine Grösse von 10— 12 u. Kern vorhanden. Pseudopodien wie bei der vorig. Art kurz, stumpf, lobos. Pulsirende Vakuole nicht vorhanden. Plasma von ,,eigenthümlicher Netz- u. Schaumstruktur" [wohl wabig sensu Bütschli]. Zweitheilung nur selten beobachtet. — Befand sich in gährenden Weintrauben, nährt sich von Saccharomyces apiculatus u. Essigbakterien. Mit diesen Nährobjekten gelang ihre Kultur auf Malzextraktgelatine. Durch wiederholtes Impfen wurden 3 Kombinationen in Reinkulturen erzielt: 1. Amöben mit Apiculatus- hefe u. Essigbakterien. 2. Amöben mit Apiculatushefe. 3. Amöben mit Essigbakterien. Die Kulturen gelangen auch auf Nährgelatine u. Agar, Fleischwasserpepton- Gelatine u. Agar. A. zym. nährt sich nur von festen Stoffen, kann aber Nährgelatine verflüssigen. Das von ihr (wahrscli. durch die Vakuolen) entleerte Enzym ist ein bedeutungs- loses Exkretionsprodukt. Bigot, A. Les organismes precambriens du massif Breton. Bull. Soc. Normand. 1895. IX. p. 12. Vorhandensein von Radiolarien und Foraminiferen. Blanchard siehe L a v e r a n. Boas, — . Ueber Amöbenenteritis. Berliner klinische Wochen- schrift. 1896. p. 89. — Ferner Dtsche. med. Wochenschr. 1896. N. 14. — Ref. Centralbl. f. Bakt. u. Paras. 19. Bd. p. 572—573 u. 20. Bd. I. p. 33—34. Untersuchung bei 2 Frauen. Darmentleerungen (in einem Falle erbsenbreiähnlich), unter starker Gasbildung u. alkalisch. — Beschreib, des Parasiten u. Heilung. Die mikroskopische Untersuchung des Stuhles ergab zahlr. Amöben in 3 verschiedenen Formen: 1. Cysten, 2. ruhende, 3. stark in Bewegung befindliche Formen. Grösse 15 schwankend, —20 ij. Rote Blutkörperchen innerhalb des Plasmas fanden sich nicht. Lebensfähigkeit 8—10 Std., nicht mehr als 24. Unter 43 Fällen wurden 9 amöbenähnliche Gebilde gefunden, die sich aber von echten Amöben unterschieden. Du Bois Saint- Sevriii. Le diagnostic bacteriologique du palu- disme. Arch. de med. navale. 1896. No. 5. p. 335—346. Boisson, L. L'hematozoaire du paludisme. Lyon med. 1896, No. 14. p. 463—466. Boissou, — . La fievre paludeenne biHeuse hemoglobinurique. Rev. de med. 1896. No. 5. p. 360—383. Bokorny, Th. (I). Vergleichende Studien über die Giftwirkung verschiedener chemischer Substanzen bei Algen und Infusorien. Arch. Phys. Pflüger. 64. Bd. p. 262—306. © Biodiversity Heritage Library, http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/; www.zobodat.at 108 XVin. Protozoa, mit Ausschluss der Poraminifera, für 1896. Als "Wegweiser zur richtigen Beurtheilung der Beziehungen der Konstitution der Giftigkeit diente 0. L o e w „Natürliches System der Giftwirkungen" München. 1893. I. Basen u. Säuren unorganischer Natur (p. 263—270). — IL Salze (p. 270—273). — III. Oxydations- gifte (p. 273—277). — IV. Phosphor (p. 277—278). — V. Organische Säuren (p. 278—283). — VI. Kohlenwasserstoffe (p. 283). — VII. Alkohol (p. 284—286). — VIII. Halogenderivate (p. 286—288). — IX. Aldehyde (p. 288—289). Es kommt sehr auf den Labilitätsgrad an, ob die Aldehyde giftig wirken oder nicht. — X. Nitroderivate (p. 289 —290). Der Eintritt von Nitrogruppen (N O2) in das Molekül orga- nischer Substanzen scheint die Giftigkeit ders. zu steigern oder erst hervorzurufen. Durch Einführung der Sulfo- Gruppe in das Phenol- Molekül wird keine Steigerung der Giftigkeit herbeigeführt. — XL Cyan-Verbindungen (p. 290—294). Aus den Versuchen geht hervor, dass nur wenige Cyanverbindungen für Algen u. Infusorien giftig sind Dicyan ist ein starkes Gift, Cyankalium u. Blausäure ein weit schwächeres aber immer noch erhebliches Gift, Cyanessigsäure (neutra- lisirt), Benzonitril, Ferrocyankalium, Schwefelcyankalium, Cyanur- säure (neutralisirt) sind nicht oder nur als schwache Gifte zu
Recommended publications
  • Protistology an International Journal Vol
    Protistology An International Journal Vol. 10, Number 2, 2016 ___________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS INTERNATIONAL SCIENTIFIC FORUM «PROTIST–2016» Yuri Mazei (Vice-Chairman) Welcome Address 2 Organizing Committee 3 Organizers and Sponsors 4 Abstracts 5 Author Index 94 Forum “PROTIST-2016” June 6–10, 2016 Moscow, Russia Website: http://onlinereg.ru/protist-2016 WELCOME ADDRESS Dear colleagues! Republic) entitled “Diplonemids – new kids on the block”. The third lecture will be given by Alexey The Forum “PROTIST–2016” aims at gathering Smirnov (Saint Petersburg State University, Russia): the researchers in all protistological fields, from “Phylogeny, diversity, and evolution of Amoebozoa: molecular biology to ecology, to stimulate cross- new findings and new problems”. Then Sandra disciplinary interactions and establish long-term Baldauf (Uppsala University, Sweden) will make a international scientific cooperation. The conference plenary presentation “The search for the eukaryote will cover a wide range of fundamental and applied root, now you see it now you don’t”, and the fifth topics in Protistology, with the major focus on plenary lecture “Protist-based methods for assessing evolution and phylogeny, taxonomy, systematics and marine water quality” will be made by Alan Warren DNA barcoding, genomics and molecular biology, (Natural History Museum, United Kingdom). cell biology, organismal biology, parasitology, diversity and biogeography, ecology of soil and There will be two symposia sponsored by ISoP: aquatic protists, bioindicators and palaeoecology. “Integrative co-evolution between mitochondria and their hosts” organized by Sergio A. Muñoz- The Forum is organized jointly by the International Gómez, Claudio H. Slamovits, and Andrew J. Society of Protistologists (ISoP), International Roger, and “Protists of Marine Sediments” orga- Society for Evolutionary Protistology (ISEP), nized by Jun Gong and Virginia Edgcomb.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Marine Fungi 20130420 151718.Pdf
    Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology Series Editors Werner E.G. Mu¨ller Philippe Jeanteur, Robert E. Rhoads, Ðurðica Ugarkovic´, Ma´rcio Reis Custo´dio 53 Volumes Published in the Series Progress in Molecular Subseries: and Subcellular Biology Marine Molecular Biotechnology Volume 36 Volume 37 Viruses and Apoptosis Sponges (Porifera) C. Alonso (Ed.) W.E.G. Mu¨ller (Ed.) Volume 38 Volume 39 Epigenetics and Chromatin Echinodermata Ph. Jeanteur (Ed.) V. Matranga (Ed.) Volume 40 Volume 42 Developmental Biology of Neoplastic Antifouling Compounds Growth N. Fusetani and A.S. Clare (Eds.) A. Macieira-Coelho (Ed.) Volume 43 Volume 41 Molluscs Molecular Basis of Symbiosis G. Cimino and M. Gavagnin (Eds.) J. Overmann (Ed.) Volume 46 Volume 44 Marine Toxins as Research Tools Alternative Splicing and Disease N. Fusetani and W. Kem (Eds.) Ph. Jeanlevr (Ed.) Volume 47 Volume 45 Biosilica in Evolution, Morphogenesis, Asymmetric Cell Division and Nanobiotechnology A. Macieira Coelho (Ed.) W.E.G. Mu¨ller and M.A. Grachev (Eds.) Volume 48 Volume 52 Centromere Molecular Biomineralization Ðurdica- Ugarkovic´ (Ed.) W.E.G. Mu¨ller (Ed.) Volume 49 Volume 53 Aestivation Biology of Marine Fungi C.A. Navas and J.E. Carvalho (Eds.) C. Raghukumar (Ed.) Volume 50 miRNA Regulation of the Translational Machinery R.E. Rhoads (Ed.) Volume 51 Long Non-Coding RNAs Ðurdica- Ugarkovic (Ed.) Chandralata Raghukumar Editor Biology of Marine Fungi Editor Dr. Chandralata Raghukumar National Institute of Oceanography Marine Biotechnology Laboratory Dona Paula 403004 Panjim India [email protected] ISSN 0079-6484 ISBN 978-3-642-23341-8 e-ISBN 978-3-642-23342-5 DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-23342-5 Springer Heidelberg Dordrecht London New York Library of Congress Control Number: 2011943185 # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012 This work is subject to copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of Protozoan Parasites Recorded in Australia Peter J. O
    1 CATALOGUE OF PROTOZOAN PARASITES RECORDED IN AUSTRALIA PETER J. O’DONOGHUE & ROBERT D. ADLARD O’Donoghue, P.J. & Adlard, R.D. 2000 02 29: Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Memoirs of the Queensland Museum 45(1):1-164. Brisbane. ISSN 0079-8835. Published reports of protozoan species from Australian animals have been compiled into a host- parasite checklist, a parasite-host checklist and a cross-referenced bibliography. Protozoa listed include parasites, commensals and symbionts but free-living species have been excluded. Over 590 protozoan species are listed including amoebae, flagellates, ciliates and ‘sporozoa’ (the latter comprising apicomplexans, microsporans, myxozoans, haplosporidians and paramyxeans). Organisms are recorded in association with some 520 hosts including mammals, marsupials, birds, reptiles, amphibians, fish and invertebrates. Information has been abstracted from over 1,270 scientific publications predating 1999 and all records include taxonomic authorities, synonyms, common names, sites of infection within hosts and geographic locations. Protozoa, parasite checklist, host checklist, bibliography, Australia. Peter J. O’Donoghue, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, The University of Queensland, St Lucia 4072, Australia; Robert D. Adlard, Protozoa Section, Queensland Museum, PO Box 3300, South Brisbane 4101, Australia; 31 January 2000. CONTENTS the literature for reports relevant to contemporary studies. Such problems could be avoided if all previous HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST 5 records were consolidated into a single database. Most Mammals 5 researchers currently avail themselves of various Reptiles 21 electronic database and abstracting services but none Amphibians 26 include literature published earlier than 1985 and not all Birds 34 journal titles are covered in their databases. Fish 44 Invertebrates 54 Several catalogues of parasites in Australian PARASITE-HOST CHECKLIST 63 hosts have previously been published.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S1 18Jan 2021
    Supplementary Table S1. Accurate scientific names of plant pathogenic fungi and secondary barcodes. Below is a list of the most important plant pathogenic fungi including Oomycetes with their accurate scientific names and synonyms. These scientific names include the results of the change to one scientific name for fungi. For additional information including plant hosts and localities worldwide as well as references consult the USDA-ARS U.S. National Fungus Collections (http://nt.ars- grin.gov/fungaldatabases/). Secondary barcodes, where available, are listed in superscript between round parentheses after generic names. The secondary barcodes listed here do not represent all known available loci for a given genus. Always consult recent literature for which primers and loci are required to resolve your species of interest. Also keep in mind that not all barcodes are available for all species of a genus and that not all species/genera listed below are known from sequence data. GENERA AND SPECIES NAME AND SYNONYMYS DISEASE SECONDARY BARCODES1 Kingdom Fungi Ascomycota Dothideomycetes Asterinales Asterinaceae Thyrinula(CHS-1, TEF1, TUB2) Thyrinula eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) H.J. Swart 1988 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Leptostromella eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1891 Thyrinula eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Target spot or corky spot of Eucalyptus Lembosiopsis eucalyptina Petr. & Syd. 1924 Aulographum eucalypti Cooke & Massee 1889 Aulographina eucalypti (Cooke & Massee) Arx & E. Müll. 1960 Lembosiopsis australiensis Hansf. 1954 Botryosphaeriales Botryosphaeriaceae Botryosphaeria(TEF1, TUB2) Botryosphaeria dothidea (Moug.) Ces. & De Not. 1863 Canker, stem blight, dieback, fruit rot on Fusicoccum Sphaeria dothidea Moug. 1823 diverse hosts Fusicoccum aesculi Corda 1829 Phyllosticta divergens Sacc. 1891 Sphaeria coronillae Desm.
    [Show full text]
  • Relationship Between the Flagellates Andthe Ciliates
    MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Dec. 1992, p. 529-542 Vol. 56, No. 4 0146-0749/92/040529-14$02.00/0 Copyright © 1992, American Society for Microbiology Relationship between the Flagellates and the Ciliates ROBERT EDWARD LEE'* AND PAUL KUGRENS2 Department ofAnatomy and Neurobiologyl* and Department ofBiology, 2 Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................... 529 COMPARISONS BASED ON MORPHOLOGICAL AND CYTOLOGICAL STRUCTURES .................529 Dinoflagellates and Ciliates ....................................................................... 529 Comparison of dinoflagellates and ciliates ....................................................................... 531 (i) Cortical alveoli ....................................................................... 531 (ii) Mitochondrial cristae ........................................................................ 531 (iii) Structures of cilia, flagella, and associated structures .....................................................532 (a) Grouping and number of cilia and flagela....................................................................532 (b) Surface and subsurface of cilia and flagela ........................................ ...................532 (c) Basal body structure ....................................................................... 533 (d) Type of ciliaryn ecklace .......................................................................533 (e) Type of ciliary and flagelar roots ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Classification of Lower Organisms
    The Classification of Lower Organisms Ernst Hkinrich Haickei, in 1874 From Rolschc (1906). By permission of Macrae Smith Company. C f3 The Classification of LOWER ORGANISMS By HERBERT FAULKNER COPELAND \ PACIFIC ^.,^,kfi^..^ BOOKS PALO ALTO, CALIFORNIA Copyright 1956 by Herbert F. Copeland Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 56-7944 Published by PACIFIC BOOKS Palo Alto, California Printed and bound in the United States of America CONTENTS Chapter Page I. Introduction 1 II. An Essay on Nomenclature 6 III. Kingdom Mychota 12 Phylum Archezoa 17 Class 1. Schizophyta 18 Order 1. Schizosporea 18 Order 2. Actinomycetalea 24 Order 3. Caulobacterialea 25 Class 2. Myxoschizomycetes 27 Order 1. Myxobactralea 27 Order 2. Spirochaetalea 28 Class 3. Archiplastidea 29 Order 1. Rhodobacteria 31 Order 2. Sphaerotilalea 33 Order 3. Coccogonea 33 Order 4. Gloiophycea 33 IV. Kingdom Protoctista 37 V. Phylum Rhodophyta 40 Class 1. Bangialea 41 Order Bangiacea 41 Class 2. Heterocarpea 44 Order 1. Cryptospermea 47 Order 2. Sphaerococcoidea 47 Order 3. Gelidialea 49 Order 4. Furccllariea 50 Order 5. Coeloblastea 51 Order 6. Floridea 51 VI. Phylum Phaeophyta 53 Class 1. Heterokonta 55 Order 1. Ochromonadalea 57 Order 2. Silicoflagellata 61 Order 3. Vaucheriacea 63 Order 4. Choanoflagellata 67 Order 5. Hyphochytrialea 69 Class 2. Bacillariacea 69 Order 1. Disciformia 73 Order 2. Diatomea 74 Class 3. Oomycetes 76 Order 1. Saprolegnina 77 Order 2. Peronosporina 80 Order 3. Lagenidialea 81 Class 4. Melanophycea 82 Order 1 . Phaeozoosporea 86 Order 2. Sphacelarialea 86 Order 3. Dictyotea 86 Order 4. Sporochnoidea 87 V ly Chapter Page Orders. Cutlerialea 88 Order 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett .F Edgerton James Cook University, [email protected]
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Laboratory of Parasitology 3-2002 Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett .F Edgerton James Cook University, [email protected] Louis H. Evans Curtin University of Technology Frances J. Stephens Curtin University of Technology Robin M. Overstreet Gulf Coast Research Laboratory, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs Part of the Aquaculture and Fisheries Commons, and the Parasitology Commons Edgerton, Brett .;F Evans, Louis H.; Stephens, Frances J.; and Overstreet, Robin M., "Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms" (2002). Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology. 884. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/parasitologyfacpubs/884 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Parasitology, Harold W. Manter Laboratory of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications from the Harold W. Manter Laboratory of Parasitology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in Aquaculture 206:1–2 (March 2002), pp. 57–135; doi: 10.1016/S0044-8486(01)00865-1 Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science. Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Deriva- tives License. Accepted October 18, 2001; published online November 30, 2001. Synopsis of Freshwater Crayfish Diseases and Commensal Organisms Brett F. Edgerton,1 Louis H. Evans,2 Frances J. Stephens,2 and Robin M. Overstreet3 1. Department of Microbiology and Immunology, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4810, Australia 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Microtubules and Associated Microfilaments in the Tentacles of the Suctorian Heliophrya Erhardi Matthes M. Hauser and Helga
    J . Cell Sci. 20, 589-617 (1976) 589 Printed in Great Britain MICROTUBULES AND ASSOCIATED MICROFILAMENTS IN THE TENTACLES OF THE SUCTORIAN HELIOPHRYA ERHARDI MATTHES M. HAUSER AND HELGA VAN EYS Lehrstuhlfdr Zdlmorphologie der Ruhr-Universitat Bochum, D - 463 Bockum, Postfach 2148 (F.R. Germany) SUMMARY At the ultrastructural level length changes accompanying linear movements of resting (non- feeding) tentacles of the suctorian Heliophrya involve not only altered microtubule numbers, but also marked changes in the specific microtubule pattern of cross-sectioned tentacles. These changes in number and pattern indicate a sliding between axonemal microrubules. The visualiza- tion of microfilaments in the cytoplasm at the tentacle base and in the knob region could shed new light on the problem of whether microrubular sliding is an active or passive process. At the tentacle base, microfilaments are either arranged in a ring-shaped configuration around the axoneme, or they run parallel to the axonemal microtubules, whereas at the tentacle tip during the resting state, microfilaments are closely associated with the plasma membrane of the knob. They form a filamentous reticular layer, which is continuous at the anchorage site of axonemal microtubules with the dense epiplasmic layer of the tentacle shaft. Obviously, this filamentous layer is engaged in positioning the haptocysts at the plasma membrane and in holding the membrane itself under tension. The putative contractile nature of microfilaments and the epiplasmic layer is argued from ATP-sensitive glycerol models of tentacles and from the results of halothane treatment of native tentacles. Halothane treatment of resting tentacles also gave indications of the presence of differentially stable intermicrotubule-bridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Protista (PDF)
    1 = Astasiopsis distortum (Dujardin,1841) Bütschli,1885 South Scandinavian Marine Protoctista ? Dingensia Patterson & Zölffel,1992, in Patterson & Larsen (™ Heteromita angusta Dujardin,1841) Provisional Check-list compiled at the Tjärnö Marine Biological * Taxon incertae sedis. Very similar to Cryptaulax Skuja Laboratory by: Dinomonas Kent,1880 TJÄRNÖLAB. / Hans G. Hansson - 1991-07 - 1997-04-02 * Taxon incertae sedis. Species found in South Scandinavia, as well as from neighbouring areas, chiefly the British Isles, have been considered, as some of them may show to have a slightly more northern distribution, than what is known today. However, species with a typical Lusitanian distribution, with their northern Diphylleia Massart,1920 distribution limit around France or Southern British Isles, have as a rule been omitted here, albeit a few species with probable norhern limits around * Marine? Incertae sedis. the British Isles are listed here until distribution patterns are better known. The compiler would be very grateful for every correction of presumptive lapses and omittances an initiated reader could make. Diplocalium Grassé & Deflandre,1952 (™ Bicosoeca inopinatum ??,1???) * Marine? Incertae sedis. Denotations: (™) = Genotype @ = Associated to * = General note Diplomita Fromentel,1874 (™ Diplomita insignis Fromentel,1874) P.S. This list is a very unfinished manuscript. Chiefly flagellated organisms have yet been considered. This * Marine? Incertae sedis. provisional PDF-file is so far only published as an Intranet file within TMBL:s domain. Diplonema Griessmann,1913, non Berendt,1845 (Diptera), nec Greene,1857 (Coel.) = Isonema ??,1???, non Meek & Worthen,1865 (Mollusca), nec Maas,1909 (Coel.) PROTOCTISTA = Flagellamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lackeymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Lowymonas Skvortzow,19?? = Milaneziamonas Skvortzow,19?? = Spira Skvortzow,19?? = Teixeiromonas Skvortzow,19?? = PROTISTA = Kolbeana Skvortzow,19?? * Genus incertae sedis.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of PROTOZOA RECORDED in AUSTRALASIA O'donoghue P.J. 1986
    1 PROTOZOAN PARASITES IN ANIMALS Abbreviations KINGDOM PHYLUM CLASS ORDER CODE Protista Sarcomastigophora Phytomastigophorea Dinoflagellida PHY:din Euglenida PHY:eug Zoomastigophorea Kinetoplastida ZOO:kin Proteromonadida ZOO:pro Retortamonadida ZOO:ret Diplomonadida ZOO:dip Pyrsonymphida ZOO:pyr Trichomonadida ZOO:tri Hypermastigida ZOO:hyp Opalinatea Opalinida OPA:opa Lobosea Amoebida LOB:amo Acanthopodida LOB:aca Leptomyxida LOB:lep Heterolobosea Schizopyrenida HET:sch Apicomplexa Gregarinia Neogregarinida GRE:neo Eugregarinida GRE:eug Coccidia Adeleida COC:ade Eimeriida COC:eim Haematozoa Haemosporida HEM:hae Piroplasmida HEM:pir Microspora Microsporea Microsporida MIC:mic Myxozoa Myxosporea Bivalvulida MYX:biv Multivalvulida MYX:mul Actinosporea Actinomyxida ACT:act Haplosporidia Haplosporea Haplosporida HAP:hap Paramyxea Marteilidea Marteilida MAR:mar Ciliophora Spirotrichea Clevelandellida SPI:cle Litostomatea Pleurostomatida LIT:ple Vestibulifera LIT:ves Entodiniomorphida LIT:ent Phyllopharyngea Cyrtophorida PHY:cyr Endogenida PHY:end Exogenida PHY:exo Oligohymenophorea Hymenostomatida OLI:hym Scuticociliatida OLI:scu Sessilida OLI:ses Mobilida OLI:mob Apostomatia OLI:apo Uncertain status UNC:sta References O’Donoghue P.J. & Adlard R.D. 2000. Catalogue of protozoan parasites recorded in Australia. Mem. Qld. Mus. 45:1-163. 2 HOST-PARASITE CHECKLIST Class: MAMMALIA [mammals] Subclass: EUTHERIA [placental mammals] Order: PRIMATES [prosimians and simians] Suborder: SIMIAE [monkeys, apes, man] Family: HOMINIDAE [man] Homo sapiens Linnaeus,
    [Show full text]
  • The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists
    J. Eukaryot. Microbiol., 52(5), 2005 pp. 399–451 r 2005 by the International Society of Protistologists DOI: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2005.00053.x The New Higher Level Classification of Eukaryotes with Emphasis on the Taxonomy of Protists SINA M. ADL,a ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,a MARK A. FARMER,b ROBERT A. ANDERSEN,c O. ROGER ANDERSON,d JOHN R. BARTA,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f GUY BRUGEROLLE,g ROBERT A. FENSOME,h SUZANNE FREDERICQ,i TIMOTHY Y. JAMES,j SERGEI KARPOV,k PAUL KUGRENS,1 JOHN KRUG,m CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,n LOUISE A. LEWIS,o JEAN LODGE,p DENIS H. LYNN,q DAVID G. MANN,r RICHARD M. MCCOURT,s LEONEL MENDOZA,t ØJVIND MOESTRUP,u SHARON E. MOZLEY-STANDRIDGE,v THOMAS A. NERAD,w CAROL A. SHEARER,x ALEXEY V. SMIRNOV,y FREDERICK W. SPIEGELz and MAX F. J. R. TAYLORaa aDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4J1, Canada, and bCenter for Ultrastructural Research, Department of Cellular Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia 30602, USA, and cBigelow Laboratory for Ocean Sciences, West Boothbay Harbor, ME 04575, USA, and dLamont-Dogherty Earth Observatory, Palisades, New York 10964, USA, and eDepartment of Pathobiology, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada, and fWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York 12201, USA, and gBiologie des Protistes, Universite´ Blaise Pascal de Clermont-Ferrand, F63177 Aubiere cedex, France, and hNatural Resources Canada, Geological Survey of Canada (Atlantic), Bedford Institute of Oceanography, PO Box 1006 Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada, and iDepartment of Biology, University of Louisiana at Lafayette, Lafayette, Louisiana 70504, USA, and jDepartment of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708-0338, USA, and kBiological Faculty, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, St.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes
    Published in Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 59, issue 5, 429-514, 2012 which should be used for any reference to this work 1 The Revised Classification of Eukaryotes SINA M. ADL,a,b ALASTAIR G. B. SIMPSON,b CHRISTOPHER E. LANE,c JULIUS LUKESˇ,d DAVID BASS,e SAMUEL S. BOWSER,f MATTHEW W. BROWN,g FABIEN BURKI,h MICAH DUNTHORN,i VLADIMIR HAMPL,j AARON HEISS,b MONA HOPPENRATH,k ENRIQUE LARA,l LINE LE GALL,m DENIS H. LYNN,n,1 HILARY MCMANUS,o EDWARD A. D. MITCHELL,l SHARON E. MOZLEY-STANRIDGE,p LAURA W. PARFREY,q JAN PAWLOWSKI,r SONJA RUECKERT,s LAURA SHADWICK,t CONRAD L. SCHOCH,u ALEXEY SMIRNOVv and FREDERICK W. SPIEGELt aDepartment of Soil Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 5A8, Canada, and bDepartment of Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and cDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, USA, and dBiology Center and Faculty of Sciences, Institute of Parasitology, University of South Bohemia, Cˇeske´ Budeˇjovice, Czech Republic, and eZoology Department, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, United Kingdom, and fWadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, New York, 12201, USA, and gDepartment of Biochemistry, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2, Canada, and hDepartment of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada, and iDepartment of Ecology, University of Kaiserslautern, 67663, Kaiserslautern, Germany, and jDepartment of Parasitology, Charles University, Prague, 128 43, Praha 2, Czech
    [Show full text]