DOCSLIB.ORG

Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEST PRACTICES FOR ASKING QUESTIONS TO IDENTIFY TRANSGENDER AND OTHER GENDER MINORITY RESPONDENTS ON POPULATION-BASED SURVEYS Created by the Gender Identity in U.S. Surveillance (GenIUSS) group, a multi-disciplinary and multi-institutional collaboration SEPTEMBER 2014 UCLA, SCHOOL OF LAW BOX 951476 Los Angeles CA, 90095 www.williaminstitute.law.ucla.edu SUGGESTED CITATIONS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS FULL REPORT The GenIUSS group thanks each individual who has The GenIUSS Group. (2014). Best Practices for Asking been involved in this effort, including those who Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender participated in the studies that informed this report. Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys. We thank Ryan Nelson, Elaine Harley, Brad Sears, Matt J.L. Herman (Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Strieker, and Laura Rodriguez for their contributions. Institute. We also sincerely thank the anonymous donor who provided generous support for this multi-year effort. INDIVIDUAL CHAPTER Chapter author(s). (2014). Title of chapter. In J.L. Herman (Ed.), Best Practices for Asking Questions to Identify Transgender and Other Gender Minority Respondents on Population-Based Surveys (pages of chapter). Los Angeles, CA: The Williams Institute. DESIGNED BY: HARLEY GRAPHIC DESIGN www.harleygraphicdesign.com ABOUT THE GENIUSS GROUP AND THIS REPORT In 2011, the Williams Institute at the UCLA School of view of analytic considerations, including sample size Law convened a multi-disciplinary and multi-institu- and standard error, variable construction, and aggre- tional group of experts to increase population-based gation of data. data about transgender people and other gender minorities by advancing the development of sex and GENIUSS GROUP STEERING COMMITTEE gender-related measures (i.e., sex assigned at birth, • Kerith Conron, The Fenway Institute; Department gender identity, gender expression, transgender of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston; Heller School of Social Polity, Brandeis status) for population-based surveys, with a particu- Univeristy lar consideration for publicly-funded data collection efforts. To achieve this goal, between 2011 and 2013 • Gary J. Gates, Williams Institute, UCLA School of this group, known as the Gender Identity in U.S. Law Surveillance (GenIUSS) group, mapped the landscape of current practices to identify transgender and other • Jody L. Herman, Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law gender minority respondents in population research, assessed challenges to collecting data on gender-re- • Scout, LGBT HealthLink lated aspects of individual identity, and developed strategies for establishing consistent, scientifically rig- REPORT AUTHORS orous procedures for gathering information relevant • M.V. Lee Badgett, Center for Public Policy & to the needs and experiences of transgender people Administration, University of Massachusetts and other gender minorities. Amherst; Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law • Kellan E. Baker, Center for American Progress This report is the culmination of the work of the Ge- nIUSS group and serves as a companion to the 2009 • Kerith Conron, The Fenway Institute; Department report from the Sexual Minority Assessment Research of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Team (SMART), also coordinated by the Williams Boston; Heller School of Social Polity, Brandeis Institute, entitled Best Practices for Asking Questions Univeristy about Sexual Orientation on Surveys. In Chapter 1 of • Gary J. Gates, Williams Institute, UCLA School of this report, we review some of the largest and most Law important federally-supported surveys that are top priorities for adding sex and gender-related measures • Alison Gill, Human Rights Campaign to identify transgender and other gender minority respondents. Chapter 2 presents approaches to iden- • Emily Greytak, GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network) tifying transgender people and other gender minori- ties through surveys using measures of sex assigned • Jody L. Herman, Williams Institute, UCLA School at birth, gender identity, gender expression, and of Law transgender status. Chapter 3 describes which ques- tions may be most appropriate for different kinds of • Stewart Landers, John Snow, Inc. surveys, where in the survey to place these questions, and how different modes of survey administration • Emilia Lombardi, Department of Public Health, may affect the number and validity of responses. School of Health Sciences, Baldwin Wallace Chapter 4 provides special considerations for data col- University lection with sex and gender-related measures related to age, race and ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and • Phoenix Alicia Matthews, College of Nursing, intersex status. Finally, Chapter 5 provides an over- University of Illinois at Chicago i • Sari Reisner, The Fenway Institute; Department • Paisley Currah, Department of Political Science, of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Brooklyn College, CUNY • Masen Davis, Transgender Law Center • Scout, LGBT HealthLink • Gary J. Gates, Williams Institute, UCLA School of • Anne Tamar-Mattis, Advocates for Informed Law Choice • Alison Gill, Human Rights Campaign • Hida Viloria, Organisation Intersex International • Emily Greytak, GLSEN (Gay, Lesbian & Straight Education Network) (OII) and OII-USA • Jody L. Herman, Williams Institute, UCLA School REPORT REVIEWERS of Law • Kylar Broadus, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force • JoAnne Keatley, Center of Excellence for Transgender Health, University of California, San Francisco • Paisley Currah, Department of Political Science, Brooklyn College, CUNY • Mara Keisling, National Center for Transgender Equality • Kristen Schilt, Department of Sociology, University of Chicago • Shane R. Landrum, Department of History, Florida International University REPORT EDITOR • Emilia Lombardi, Department of Public Health, • Jody L. Herman, Williams Institute, UCLA School School of Health Sciences, Baldwin Wallace of Law University GENIUSS GROUP MEMBERS APPROVING • Phoenix Alicia Matthews, College of Nursing, THIS REPORT University of Illinois at Chicago S. Bryn Austin, Social and Behavioral Sciences, • Sari Reisner, The Fenway Institute; Department Harvard School of Public Health; Pediatrics, • of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health Harvard Medical School, Division of Adolescent and Young Adult Medicine, Boston Diego M. Sanchez, PFLAG National Children’s Hospital • Kristen Schilt, Department of Sociology, M.V. Lee Badgett, Center for Public Policy & • • University of Chicago Administration, University of Massachusetts Amherst; Williams Institute, UCLA School of Law Gunner Scott, Pride Foundation • • Kellan E. Baker, Center for American Progress • Scout, LGBT HealthLink Kylar Broadus, National Gay and Lesbian • Ben Singer, Women’s Studies Department, Task Force • Kansas State University David H. Chae, Department of Epidemiology and • Susan Stryker, Gender and Women’s Studies, Biostatistics, University of Maryland, School of • University of Arizona Public Health Bali White, MA Kerith Conron, The Fenway Institute; Department • • of Health Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston; Heller School of Social Policy, Brandeis University ii TABLE OF CONTENTS iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ix GLOSSARY xii ABBREVIATIONS USED IN THIS REPORT xiv A LETTER TO GENDER MINORITY COMMUNITIES FROM THE GENIUSS GROUP CHAPTER 1 IDENTIFYING TRANSGENDER AND OTHER GENDER 01 MINORITY RESPONDENTS ON POPULATION-BASED SURVEYS: WHY ASK? CHAPTER 2 IDENTIFYING TRANSGENDER AND OTHER 09 GENDER MinoRITY RESPONDENTS ON PoPulaTion-BasED SURVEYS: APPROACHES ChapTEr 3 IdEnTIfyIng TransgEndEr and OThEr gEndEr 19 MINORITY RESPONDENTS ON POPULATION-BASED SURVEYS: HOW AND WHERE TO ASK CHAPTER 4 IDENTIFYING TRANSGENDER AND OTHER GENDER MINORITY RESPONDENTS ON POPULATION-BASED SURVEYS: 29 SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS FOR ADOLESCENTS, RACE/ETHNICITY, SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS, AND INTERSEX STATUS 44 CHAPTER 5 IDENTIFYING TRANSGENDER AND OTHER GENDER MINORITY RESPONDENTS ON POPULATION-BASED SURVEYS: CONSIDERATIONS FOR ANALYSIS iii EXECUTIVE SUmmARY WHY ASK SURVEY QUESTIONS TO the American Community Survey (ACS), the Current IDENTIFY TRANSGENDER AND OTHER Population Survey (CPS), the Survey of Income and GENDER MINORITIES IN SURVEYS? Program Participation (SIPP), the National Crime Vic- timization Survey (NCVS), the National Health Inter- Transgender and other gender minority individuals view Survey (NHIS), and the National Survey of Veter- come from a wide range of geographic and demo- ans (NSV). A few surveys (the Behavioral Risk Factor graphic backgrounds. Transgender and other gender Surveillance System (BRFSS), the Youth Risk Behavior minority people are diverse in such factors as age, Surveillance System (YRBS), and the National Inmate race, ethnicity, income, sexual orientation, socioeco- Survey (NIS)) do have measures to identity transgen- nomic status, and immigration status. Despite their der and/or other gender minority respondents, but differences, gender minority people from all back- either more consistent addition of these measures is grounds face common experiences of discrimination needed across surveys administered in the states or in a wide array of settings across the United States these surveys should consider revised measures. today. The consequences of discrimination can be severe. According to the 2011 National Healthcare WHAT ARE THE RECOMMENDED AP- Disparities Report, transgender people, particularly PROACHES FOR IDENTIFYING TRANS- those who are visibly gender non-conforming,
Recommended publications
  • Transgender Representation on American Narrative Television from 2004-2014

    Transgender Representation on American Narrative Television from 2004-2014

    TRANSJACKING TELEVISION: TRANSGENDER REPRESENTATION ON AMERICAN NARRATIVE TELEVISION FROM 2004-2014 A Dissertation Submitted to the Temple University Graduate Board In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY by Kelly K. Ryan May 2021 Examining Committee Members: Jan Fernback, Advisory Chair, Media and Communication Nancy Morris, Media and Communication Fabienne Darling-Wolf, Media and Communication Ron Becker, External Member, Miami University ABSTRACT This study considers the case of representation of transgender people and issues on American fictional television from 2004 to 2014, a period which represents a steady surge in transgender television characters relative to what came before, and prefigures a more recent burgeoning of transgender characters since 2014. The study thus positions the period of analysis as an historical period in the changing representation of transgender characters. A discourse analysis is employed that not only assesses the way that transgender characters have been represented, but contextualizes American fictional television depictions of transgender people within the broader sociopolitical landscape in which those depictions have emerged and which they likely inform. Television representations and the social milieu in which they are situated are considered as parallel, mutually informing discourses, including the ways in which those representations have been engaged discursively through reviews, news coverage and, in some cases, blogs. ii To Desmond, Oonagh and Eamonn For everything. And to my mother, Elaine Keisling, Who would have read the whole thing. iii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Throughout the research and writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance, and therefore offer many thanks. To my Dissertation Chair, Jan Fernback, whose feedback on my writing and continued support and encouragement were invaluable to the completion of this project.
  • Glossary: LGBTQ+ Terms

    Glossary: LGBTQ+ Terms

    Glossary: LGBTQ+ terms * This list is neither comprehensive nor inviolable, but a continual work in progress. With identity terms, trust the person who is using the term and their definition of it above any dictionary. 1. Agender: a person with no (or very little) connection to the ​ traditional system of gender, no personal alignment with the concepts of either man or woman, and/or someone who sees themselves as existing without gender. Sometimes called gender neutrois, gender neutral, or genderless. 2. Ally: person who supports and respects members of the LGBTQ community. Sometimes re-framed as a verb: “How ​ am I allying myself with x or y community?” 3. Androgynous: a gender expression that has elements of both masculinity and femininity. ​ 4. Asexual: a person who does not have significant sexual attractions. Romantic, emotional, and physical attractions, as ​ well as partnered relationships, may or may not be present. 5. Bisexual: a person who has significant romantic, emotional, physical and sexual attractions to both women and men. ​ May also be framed as attractions to two or more genders. The frequency, intensity, or quality of attraction is not necessarily directed toward both/all genders equally. 6. Cisgender: /“siss-jendur”/ a gender description for when someone’s sex assigned at birth and gender identity ​ ​ ​ ​ correspond in the expected way (e.g., someone who was assigned male at birth, and identifies as a man). A simple way to think about it is if a person is not transgender, they are cisgender. The word cisgender can also be shortened to “cis.” 7. Demisexual: little or no capacity to experience sexual attraction until a strong romantic connection is formed with ​ someone, often within a romantic relationship.
  • Serving LGBTQ Youth in Libraries Regina Demauro Teen Services Librarian Tompkins County Public Library 101 E

    Serving LGBTQ Youth in Libraries Regina Demauro Teen Services Librarian Tompkins County Public Library 101 E

    Serving LGBTQ Youth In Libraries Regina DeMauro Teen Services Librarian Tompkins County Public Library 101 E. Green Street Ithaca, NY 14850 (607) 272-4557 x 274 [email protected] Additional Statistics Resources Center for Disease Control Portal for LGBT Youth Health: https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/youth.htm CDC LGBTQ Youth Programs-at-a-Glance https://www.cdc.gov/lgbthealth/youth-programs.htm CDC Study of Sexual Identity, Sex of Sexual Contacts, and Health-Related Behaviors Among Students in Grades 9–12 (large pdf file) https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/65/ss/pdfs/ss6509.pdf GLSEN School Climate Survey https://www.glsen.org/article/2015-national-school-climate-survey LGBTQIA+ Vocabulary and definitions Compiled from The Teaching Transgender Toolkit and itspronouncedmetrosexual.com agender : A person who does not identify as having a gender identity that can be categorized as male or female, and sometimes indicates identifying as not having a gender identity. aromantic : experiencing little or no romantic attraction to others and/or has a lack of interest in romantic relationships/behavior. Aromanticism exists on a continuum from people who experience no romantic attraction or have any desire for romantic activities, to those who experience low levels, or romantic attraction only under specific conditions, and many of these different places on the continuum have their own identity labels (see demiromantic). Sometimes abbreviated to “aro” (pronounced like “arrow”). asexual : experiencing little or no sexual attraction to others and/or a lack of interest in sexual relationships/behavior. Asexuality exists on a continuum from people who experience no sexual attraction or have any desire for sex, to those who experience low levels, or sexual attraction only under specific conditions, and many of these different places on the continuum have their own identity labels (see demisexual).
  • FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR

    FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR

    Southern California Public Radio- FCC Quarterly Programming Report Jan 1-March 31, 2017 KPCC-KUOR-KJAI-KVLA START TIME Duration min:sec Public Affairs Issue 1 Public Affairs Issue 2 Show & Narrative 1/2/2017 TAKE TWO: The Binge– 2016 was a terrible year - except for all the awesome new content that was Entertainment Industry available to stream. Mark Jordan Legan goes through the best that 2016 had to 9:42 8:30 offer with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: The Ride 2017– 2017 is here and our motor critic, Sue Carpenter, Transportation puts on her prognosticator hat to predict some of the automotive stories we'll be talking about in the new year 9:51 6:00 with Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Presidents and the Press– Presidential historian Barbara Perry says contention between a President Politics Media and the news media is nothing new. She talks with Alex Cohen about her advice for journalists covering the 10:07 10:30 Trump White House. TAKE TWO: The Wall– Political scientist Peter Andreas says building Trump's Immigration Politics wall might be easier than one thinks because hundreds of miles of the border are already lined with barriers. 10:18 12:30 He joins Alex Cohen. TAKE TWO: Prison Podcast– A podcast Law & is being produced out of San Quentin Media Order/Courts/Police State Prison called Ear Hustle. We hear some excerpts and A Martinez talks to 10:22 9:30 one of the producers, Nigel Poor. TAKE TWO: The Distance Between Us– Reyna Grande grew up in poverty in Books/ Literature/ Iguala, Mexico, left behind by her Immigration Authors parents who had gone north looking for a better life and she's written a memoir for young readers.
  • Download the Playbook

    Download the Playbook

    A Guide for Reporting SOUTHERN on LGBT People in STORIES South Carolina WE ARE A PROUD SPONSOR OF THE GLAAD SOUTHERN STORIES PROGRAM 800.789.5401 MGBWHOME.COM GLAAD Southern Stories A Guide for Reporting on LGBT People in South Carolina Getting Started 4 Terms and Definitions 5 South Carolina’s LGBT History 6 When GLAAD’s Accelerating Acceptance report revealed that levels of discomfort towards the LGBT community are as high as 43% in Terms to Avoid 10 America—and spike to 61% in the South—we knew we had to act. To accelerate LGBT acceptance in the U.S. South, GLAAD is telling the stories of LGBT people from across the region through our Southern Stories program. We are amplifying stories of LGBT people who are resilient in the face of inequality and Defamatory Language 11 adversity, and building a culture in which they are able not only to survive, but also to thrive. These are impactful stories with the power to change hearts and minds, but they are too often missed or ignored altogether. In South Carolina, the LGBT community is Best Practices in Media Coverage 12 making sure and steady progress, but the work to achieve full equality and acceptance is far from done. More and more, South Carolina sees communities of faith opening their arms to LGBT people; public officials listening to families, workers, and tax payers Pitfalls to Avoid as they voice their need for equal protections; 13 students creating supportive, inclusive spaces; and allies standing up for their LGBT friends, family members, and neighbors.
  • 1. Introduction

    1. Introduction

    1. Introduction ‘Intersex’ has always been a contested category, and hence providing a definition of the term and the concept is a challenging task. Intersex activist Michelle O’Brien contends that when speaking or writing about intersex, “the first thing that has to be understood is that the definition of intersex has changed and has become increasingly policed by people with medical, activist and academic careers” (O’Brien 2009). Morgan Holmes, intersex activist and scholar, likewise argues that “intersex is not one but many sites of contested being [that] is hailed by specific and competing interests, and is a sign constantly under erasure, whose significance always carries the trace of an agenda from somewhere else” (Holmes 2009: 2). The shifting processes of signification and resignification of ‘intersex’ that have occurred throughout the centuries, but most considerably in the last two decades, need to be taken into account and are indispensable for an adequate understanding of intersex. Yet in order for intersex individuals and (an) intersex collective(s) to become recognizable, to be socioculturally acknowledged, and to act as a political agent, intersex organizations have developed a working definition of intersex. The Organization Intersex International (OII)1 provides the following definition that is currently in use and widely accepted by global intersex activists, NGOs, and generally by other medical and political agents involved in intersex debates (although their own respective definitions of intersex may differ): “Intersex people are born with physical, hormonal or genetic features that are neither wholly female nor wholly male; or a combination of female and male; or neither female nor male” (OII Australia 2013).2 Implied in this definition is the acknowledgment that various forms of intersex exist, hence intersex is to be understood as comprising a spectrum of 1 The Organization Intersex International (OII) is currently the largest global network of intersex organizations with branches in a dozen countries on five continents.
  • Nonbinary Gender Identities in Media: an Annotated Bibliography

    Nonbinary Gender Identities in Media: an Annotated Bibliography

    Nonbinary Gender Identities in Media: An Annotated Bibliography Table of Contents Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1 Glossary------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2 Adult and Young Adult Materials----------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Nonfiction-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------6 Articles (Scholarly and Popular)------------------------------------------------------------------------14 Fiction---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------19 Comics (Print and Web)----------------------------------------------------------------------------------28 Film and Television----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------31 Web Resources---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------37 Children’s Materials-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41 Nonfiction----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41 Fiction---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------41 Film and Television----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------42
  • Transgender Terminology

    Transgender Terminology

    Transgender Terminology Agender Individuals: People who identify as genderless or gender-neutral. Cisgender Individuals: People who identify with the gender that was assigned to them at birth (i.e., people who are not transgender). Cisgender Privilege: The set of conscious and unconscious advantages and/or immunities that people who are or who are perceived as gender conforming benefit from on a daily basis. Crossdressers: Individuals who, regardless of motivation, wear clothing, makeup, etc. that are considered by the culture to be appropriate for another gender but not one’s own (preferred term to “transvestites”). Drag or In Drag: Wearing clothing considered appropriate for someone of another gender. Drag Kings and Drag Queens: Female-bodied crossdressers (typically lesbians) and male-bodied crossdressers (typically gay men), respectively, who present in public, often for entertainment purposes. FTM Individuals: Female-to-male transsexual people, transsexual men, transmen, or transguys— individuals assigned female at birth who identify as male. Some transmen reject being seen as “FTM,” arguing that they have always been male and are only making this identity visible to other people (instead, they may call themselves “MTM”). Gender: The beliefs, feelings, and behaviors that a specific culture attributes to individuals based on their perceived sex. It involves gender assignment (the gender designation of someone at birth), gender roles (the expectations imposed on someone based on their gender), gender attribution (how others perceive someone’s gender), and gender identity (how someone defines their own gender). Gender Affirming Surgery: Surgical procedures that change one’s body to conform to one’s gender identity. These procedures may include “top surgery” (breast augmentation or removal) and “bottom surgery” (altering genitals).
  • Providing Affirmative Care for Patients with Non-Binary Gender Identities

    Providing Affirmative Care for Patients with Non-Binary Gender Identities

    Providing Affirmative Care for Patients with Non-binary Gender Identities Case Scenario: Talking about Gender Identity Hunter is visiting his primary care provider, Dr. Kim, whom he has been seeing since he was very young. Now, at age 18, Hunter is beginning to question his gender identity. When he filled out an intake form in the waiting room, under “gender identity,” Hunter wrote in “Don’t Know.” During the visit, Dr. Kim opens up a conversation with Hunter about his gender identity. Dr. Kim: Hunter, I noticed that on your intake form Hunter: One of my transgender friends takes today you expressed that you might not know about hormones. I didn’t know that was something you your gender identity. We don’t have to talk about could do if you didn’t identify as a man or a woman. this today, but would you like to? Dr. Kim: You certainly can! Just like transgender Hunter: I guess so. I feel kind of silly talking about people who identify as men or women, non-bina- it sometimes. I know a lot of transgender people at ry people can have gender-affirming surgeries or school, and I feel like they’ve known who they are hormones to make their bodies fit their gender since they were kids! identities. Transitioning isn’t just about moving from one end of a spectrum to the other. If you decided Dr. Kim: It’s true, some transgender people do at any point that you wanted to make any changes, express that they’ve known they were transgender we could have a conversation about your individual from a very young age.
  • LGBTQ+ for Youth Librarians

    LGBTQ+ for Youth Librarians

    LGBTQ+ 101 For Youth Librarians Blake Bonkowski, Coordinator for LGBTQ+ Programs and Initiatives, University of Michigan-Dearborn Comfort and Knowledge Comfort Knowledge Larkin, M.E. (2017). Eastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI Discussion Small groups Define sexual orientation Define gender identity List as many sexual orientations as you can List as many gender identities as you can Definitions and Labels Definitions are not concrete, and are different for each individual. Labels help individuals to find people who are similar to them, and help one communicate the general idea of approximately what their identity is. It is important to allow each individual to choose a label that they are comfortable with, and allow them to define it however they are comfortable. Acronyms There is no one “correct” acronym. Different acronyms are used for a number of reasons. I recommend LGBTQ+ as it is becoming the most common. 1. Personal preference 2. Local/regional/institutional culture 3. Bureaucracy 4. To be intentionally specific The + was added to acknowledge that there are many individuals with many labels who consider themselves a part of the LGBTQ+ community, but who do not identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer. Sexual Orientation Sexual orientation: an identity category which describes who we’re attracted to. Identities in this category include: heterosexual/straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, pansexual, queer, asexual, and more. You might hear people talk about romantic attraction, physical/aesthetic attraction, and sexual attraction separately. Queer Used four ways: 1. As an individual identity 2. As an umbrella term instead of LGBTQ+ or another acronym 3. As a slur 4.
  • Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation

    Gender Identity, and Sexual Orientation

    sparks & honey culture forecast THE NEW LANGUAGE OF GENDER BINARY TO BLURRED “People need to be willing to let go of what they think they know about what it means to be a man and what it means to be a woman.” – LAVERNE COX THE NEW LANGUAGE OF GENDER THE NEW LANGUAGE OF GENDER III BINARY TO BLURRED Language matters Gender used to be viewed through binary terms: male and female, masculine and feminine. The To be culturally new language of gender breaks out of that binary system in favor of blurred, fluid identities across literate means a gender spectrum. To be culturally literate knowing how to now demands knowing how to speak the new language of gender and knowing the difference speak the new between terms like sex, gender, gender identity, and sexual orientation. language of gender Transgender and genderqueer people have shifted culture away from the idea of rigid binary This report is a guide through the new language genders, and the implications are massive. Almost of gender, showing you how to demonstrate that everything is gendered somehow. How will the you’re an ally of these gender revolutionaries. worlds of law, politics, media, tech, marketing We pinpoint ways this cultural shift is already and advertising, fashion, design, art, architecture, impacting culture – through memes, viral videos, music, beauty, healthcare, and sports change if the trends, products, and cultural signals that indicate categories of man and woman are deconstructed that the gender revolution has arrived. And we’ll or eliminated altogether? show who’s doing it right – and who isn’t.
  • Pregnant People?

    Pregnant People?

    COLUMBIA LAW REVIEW FORUM VOL. 119 OCTOBER 11, 2019 PAGES 173–199 PREGNANT PEOPLE? Jessica Clarke* In their article Unsexing Pregnancy, David Fontana and Naomi Schoenbaum undertake the important project of disentangling the social aspects of pregnancy from those that relate to a pregnant woman’s body. They argue that the law should stop treating the types of work either parent can do—such as purchasing a carseat, finding a pediatrician, or choosing a daycare—as exclusively the domain of the pregnant wom- an. The project’s primary aim is to undermine legal rules that assume a gendered division of labor in which men are breadwinners and women are caretakers. But Fontana and Schoenbaum argue their project will also have benefits in terms of equality for expectant LGBTQ parents. To further this project, this Response asks what unsexing pregnancy might look like for different types of pregnant people: (1) pregnant individuals who do not identify as women, (2) expectant couples in which one partner is pregnant, (3) expectant parents engaging a surrogate or pur- suing adoption, and (4) pregnant people who rely on networks of family and friends for support and caregiving. It argues that, in each of these contexts, the extension of pregnancy benefits raises a unique set of ques- tions. But across all of these contexts, it will take more than simply making existing pregnancy rules gender neutral to achieve equality. INTRODUCTION In Unsexing Pregnancy, David Fontana and Naomi Schoenbaum make a compelling case against laws premised on the assumption that the caregiving tasks associated with pregnancy should be assigned exclusively to the pregnant woman.1 They argue that pregnancy requires labor in addition to that entailed in childbirth, gestation, and related changes to the pregnant body.