DOCSLIB.ORG

State of Arizona Official Canvass 2000 General Election

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
State of Arizona Official Canvass 2000 General Election Report Date/Time: 11/27/2000 11:13 AM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 1 2000 General Election - November 7, 2000 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State $SDFKH &RFKLVH &RFRQLQR *LOD *UDKDP *UHHQOHH /DÃ3D] 0DULFRSD 0RKDYH 1DYDMR 3LPD 3LQDO 6DQWDÃ&UX] <DYDSDL <XPD 727$/ Total Eligible Registration 39,103 54,500 66,731 29,368 14,902 5,143 7,136 1,226,317 75,257 50,150 371,696 73,968 16,514 93,291 49,046 2,173,122 Total Ballots Cast 19,634 34,548 42,320 18,612 9,767 3,083 4,688 914,952 45,558 26,625 289,193 42,665 9,445 68,682 29,748 1,559,520 Total Voter Turnout Percent 50.21 63.39 63.42 63.38 65.54 59.95 65.70 74.61 60.54 53.09 77.80 57.68 57.19 73.62 60.65 71.76 PRECINCTS 44 62 75 40 18 10 10 1,004 70 69 402 62 23 100 38 2,027 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTORS Democratic (Al Gore, President Joe Lieberman, Vice-President) 13,025 13,360 20,280 7,700 3,355 1,216 1,769 386,683 17,470 11,794 147,688 19,650 5,233 24,063 12,055 685,341 Elspeth Anderson Arthur M. Hamilton Charles Huggins Jewell M. Lewis Jim McNulty Pete Rios Alberta C. Tippeconnic Carolyn Warner Green (Ralph Nader, President Winona Laduke, Vice-President) 245 1,113 2,478 497 144 68 91 22,465 1,323 517 12,355 904 217 2,733 495 45,645 Mary (Katie) Bolger James Burkholder Carolyn Campbell Ari Eason Michael Green Theresa Martin Celeste Minzíkah Margaret Silk Libertarian (L. Neil Smith, President Vin Suprynowicz, Vice-President) 66 199 252 129 20 12 24 2,985 291 156 1,046 136 41 261 157 5,775 James Eric Andreasen Mike Dugger Michael T. Haggard Ernest Hancock Jennifer Horning Mark Horning Mike Renzulli Paul L. Schauble * Elected Report Date/Time: 11/27/2000 11:13 AM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 2 2000 General Election - November 7, 2000 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State $SDFKH &RFKLVH &RFRQLQR *LOD *UDKDP *UHHQOHH /DÃ3D] 0DULFRSD 0RKDYH 1DYDMR 3LPD 3LQDO 6DQWDÃ&UX] <DYDSDL <XPD 727$/ Natural Law (John Hagelin, President Nat Goldhaber, Vice-President) 15 34 66 25 7 3 3 494 44 28 205 36 14 125 21 1,120 Preston Gibson Sidney Gibson Kathleen Ruth Hansen Keith Edward Hansen Elizabeth C. Lessard Evelyn Romaine James Romaine William Romaine Reform (Pat Buchanan, President Ezola Foster, Vice-President) 135 315 244 227 131 42 53 7,156 622 266 1,731 442 44 749 216 12,373 John Gilbert Sandra Gilbert J. Lynne Kelly Eugene J. Kerkman Rosella E. Quinn Dorothy E. Roush Margot Wittenberg Russ Wittenberg Republican * (George W. Bush, President Dick Cheney, Vice-President) 5,947 18,180 17,562 9,158 6,007 1,619 2,543 479,967 24,386 12,386 124,579 20,122 3,344 40,144 15,708 781,652 Joe Arpaio Linda Barber Dennis Booth Webb Crockett Paul Robert Fannin LaVelle McCoy Susan D. Minnaugh Frank Straka * Elected Report Date/Time: 11/27/2000 11:13 AM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 3 2000 General Election - November 7, 2000 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State $SDFKH &RFKLVH &RFRQLQR *LOD *UDKDP *UHHQOHH /DÃ3D] 0DULFRSD 0RKDYH 1DYDMR 3LPD 3LQDO 6DQWDÃ&UX] <DYDSDL <XPD 727$/ Write-In (Howard Phillips [Write-In], President J. Curtis Frazier, Vice-President) 03100005850360070 110 Paul Bartley Mark Hanna Margaret A. "Peggy" Haymin William F. "Bill" Haymin Theresa Kivatinos Neil Lora John Pfeiffer Frank Quackenbush U.S. SENATOR (GRN) Vance Hansen 1,890 2,255 6,189 819 328 93 190 49,107 1,980 1,627 35,081 2,145 707 5,334 1,181 108,926 (IND) William Toel 2,376 2,128 3,297 1,384 585 256 342 68,387 4,309 2,070 12,687 3,716 853 4,647 2,193 109,230 (LBT) Barry J. Hess, II 2,011 1,752 2,887 941 375 143 228 36,847 1,972 1,835 15,280 2,183 563 2,541 1,166 70,724 (REP) Jon Kyl * 9,857 24,766 25,512 13,549 7,520 2,135 3,484 663,756 32,686 18,671 198,266 30,134 5,753 50,815 21,292 1,108,196 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 1 (DEM) David Mendoza --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 97,455 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 97,455 (LBT) Jon Burroughs --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 9,227 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 9,227 (REP) Jeff Flake * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 123,289 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 123,289 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 2 (DEM) Ed Pastor * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 29,846 --- --- 34,636 95 6,105 --- 13,352 84,034 (LBT) Geoffrey Weber --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 959 --- --- 1,479 5 221 --- 505 3,169 (NLP) Barbara Shelor --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 768 --- --- 1,039 3 183 --- 419 2,412 (REP) Bill Barenholtz --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 8,416 --- --- 8,431 4 2,204 --- 13,935 32,990 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 3 (DEM) Gene Scharer --- --- 4,467 --- --- --- 1,304 56,769 13,502 418 --- --- --- 18,216 --- 94,676 (LBT) Edward R. Carlson --- --- 566 --- --- --- 118 4,267 1,595 16 --- --- --- 2,365 --- 8,927 (REP) Bob Stump * --- --- 8,375 --- --- --- 2,973 114,927 27,322 216 --- --- --- 44,554 --- 198,367 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 4 (DEM) Ben Jankowski --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 71,803 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 71,803 (LBT) Ernest Hancock --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 7,298 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 7,298 * Elected Report Date/Time: 11/27/2000 11:13 AM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 4 2000 General Election - November 7, 2000 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State $SDFKH &RFKLVH &RFRQLQR *LOD *UDKDP *UHHQOHH /DÃ3D] 0DULFRSD 0RKDYH 1DYDMR 3LPD 3LQDO 6DQWDÃ&UX] <DYDSDL <XPD 727$/ (REP) John Shadegg * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 140,396 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 140,396 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 5 (DEM) George Cunningham --- 11,472 --- --- 3,158 --- --- --- --- --- 83,461 3,473 --- --- --- 101,564 (GRN) Michael Jay Green --- 816 --- --- 127 --- --- --- --- --- 7,808 259 --- --- --- 9,010 (LBT) Aage Nost --- 599 --- --- 147 --- --- --- --- --- 3,160 143 --- --- --- 4,049 (REP) Jim Kolbe * --- 20,231 --- --- 5,242 --- --- --- --- --- 140,273 7,240 --- --- --- 172,986 U.S. REPRESENTATIVE IN CONGRESS - DISTRICT NO. 6 (DEM) Larry Nelson 10,964 --- 12,827 6,245 426 1,088 --- 55,495 --- 9,173 --- 12,099 --- --- --- 108,317 (LBT) Richard Duncan 530 --- 1,287 593 12 88 --- 4,819 --- 717 --- 954 --- --- --- 9,000 (REP) J.D. Hayworth * 7,584 --- 12,056 10,784 270 1,718 --- 123,080 --- 14,932 --- 16,263 --- --- --- 186,687 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 1 (DEM) Dawn Knight --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 9,430 --- --- --- --- 21,111 --- 30,541 (REP) Ken Bennett * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 12,829 --- --- --- --- 30,485 --- 43,314 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 2 (DEM) Rita Johnson --- --- 15,843 475 --- --- --- --- 5,722 277 --- --- --- 4,890 --- 27,207 (REP) John Verkamp * --- --- 14,769 976 --- --- --- --- 8,087 129 --- --- --- 6,609 --- 30,570 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 3 (DEM) Jack C. Jackson * 13,131 --- 7,631 --- --- --- --- --- 3,097 5,917 --- --- --- --- --- 29,776 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 4 (DEM) Jack A. Brown * 3,761 --- --- 9,860 2,153 453 --- 0 --- 11,285 --- 5,866 --- --- --- 33,378 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 5 (DEM) Herb Guenther * --- --- --- --- --- --- 2,875 --- 19 --- --- --- --- 304 19,367 22,565 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 6 (DEM) Jim McCarthy --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 29,225 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 29,225 (REP) Lori Daniels * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 38,871 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 38,871 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 7 * Elected Report Date/Time: 11/27/2000 11:13 AM STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICIAL CANVASS Page Number 5 2000 General Election - November 7, 2000 Compiled and Issued by the Arizona Secretary of State $SDFKH &RFKLVH &RFRQLQR *LOD *UDKDP *UHHQOHH /DÃ3D] 0DULFRSD 0RKDYH 1DYDMR 3LPD 3LQDO 6DQWDÃ&UX] <DYDSDL <XPD 727$/ (DEM) Pete Rios * --- --- --- 311 --- --- --- 5,669 --- --- --- 14,431 --- --- --- 20,411 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 8 (DEM) Marsha Arzberger * --- 9,803 --- --- 3,310 1,267 --- --- --- --- --- --- 2,950 --- --- 17,330 (REP) Gail Griffin --- 9,313 --- --- 3,296 1,028 --- --- --- --- --- --- 1,187 --- --- 14,824 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 9 (DEM) Kathy Ramage-White --- 4,494 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 20,390 --- 564 --- --- 25,448 (LBT) John Jason Auvenshine --- 293 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1,136 --- 26 --- --- 1,455 (REP) Tim Bee * --- 8,458 --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 26,470 --- 802 --- --- 35,730 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 10 (DEM) Ramon Valadez * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 20,513 --- --- --- --- 20,513 (LBT) Dale Gorney --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 3,883 --- --- --- --- 3,883 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 11 (DEM) Elaine Richardson * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 56 --- --- 23,809 92 2,129 --- --- 26,086 (GRN) Daniel Patterson --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 9 --- --- 2,972 2 211 --- --- 3,194 (LBT) John T. Schmid --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 10 --- --- 2,998 12 316 --- --- 3,336 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 12 (DEM) Mark Osterloh --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 34,133 574 --- --- --- 34,707 (REP) Toni Hellon * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 36,301 649 --- --- --- 36,950 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 13 (DEM) Andy Nichols * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 27,714 --- --- --- --- 27,714 (LBT) Wayne Sunne --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 1,655 --- --- --- --- 1,655 (REP) Kathleen Dunbar --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 25,845 --- --- --- --- 25,845 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 14 (DEM) Ruth Solomon * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 30,108 --- --- --- --- 30,108 (LBT) Ed Kahn --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 9,161 --- --- --- --- 9,161 STATE SENATOR - DISTRICT NO. 15 (REP) Edward J. Cirillo * --- --- --- --- --- --- --- 47,400 --- --- --- 716 --- --- --- 48,116 * Elected Report Date/Time:
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Contemporary Voices Teacher Guide
    Teacher Guide for High School for use with the educational DVD Contemporary Voices along the Lewis & Clark Trail First Edition The Regional Learning Project collaborates with tribal educators to produce top quality, primary resource materials about Native Americans, Montana, and regional history. Bob Boyer, Kim Lugthart, Elizabeth Sperry, Sally Thompson © 2008 Regional Learning Project, The University of Montana, Center for Continuing Education Regional Learning Project at the University of Montana–Missoula grants teachers permission to photocopy the activity pages from this book for classroom use. No other part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. For more information regarding permission, write to Regional Learning Project, UM Continuing Education, Missoula, MT 59812. Acknowledgements Regional Learning Project extends grateful acknowledgement to the tribal representatives contributing to this project. The following is a list of those appearing in the DVD, from interviews conducted by Sally Thompson, Ph.D. Lewis Malatare (Yakama) Lee Bourgeau (Nez Perce) Allen Pinkham (Nez Perce) Julie Cajune (Salish) Pat Courtney Gold (Wasco) Maria Pascua (Makah) Armand Minthorn (Cayuse/Nez Perce) Cecelia Bearchum (Walla Walla/Yakama) Vernon Finley (Kootenai) Otis Halfmoon (Nez Perce) Louis Adams (Salish) Kathleen Gordon (Cayuse/Walla Walla) Felix
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona Constitution Article I ARTICLE II
    Preamble We the people of the State of Arizona, grateful to Almighty God for our liberties, do ordain this Constitution. ARTICLE I. STATE BOUNDARIES 1. Designation of boundaries The boundaries of the State of Arizona shall be as follows, namely: Beginning at a point on the Colorado River twenty English miles below the junction of the Gila and Colorado Rivers, as fixed by the Gadsden Treaty between the United States and Mexico, being in latitude thirty-two degrees, twenty-nine minutes, forty-four and forty-five one- hundredths seconds north and longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, forty-eight minutes, forty-four and fifty-three one -hundredths seconds west of Greenwich; thence along and with the international boundary line between the United States and Mexico in a southeastern direction to Monument Number 127 on said boundary line in latitude thirty- one degrees, twenty minutes north; thence east along and with said parallel of latitude, continuing on said boundary line to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred nine degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one-hundredths seconds west, being identical with the southwestern corner of New Mexico; thence north along and with said meridian of longitude and the west boundary of New Mexico to an intersection with the parallel of latitude thirty-seven degrees north, being the common corner of Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico; thence west along and with said parallel of latitude and the south boundary of Utah to an intersection with the meridian of longitude one hundred fourteen degrees, two minutes, fifty-nine and twenty-five one- hundredths seconds west, being on the east boundary line of the State of Nevada; thence south along and with said meridian of longitude and the east boundary of said State of Nevada, to the center of the Colorado River; thence down the mid-channel of said Colorado River in a southern direction along and with the east boundaries of Nevada, California, and the Mexican Territory of Lower California, successively, to the place of beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • Wiring the Rez: Innovative Strategies for Business Development Via E-Commerce CLE Conference Carl Artman
    Wiring the Rez: Innovative Strategies for Business Development via E-Commerce CLE Conference February 1 – February 2, 2018 Indian Legal Program | Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law | Arizona State University Speaker Biographies Carl Artman Carl Artman is an attorney who represents Indian tribes seeking new ways to develop their on-reservation and near-reservation economies. He is also a Faculty Associate with the Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law at Arizona State University who teaches a Washington, D.C. based Indian law class entitled Federal Advocacy for the Tribal Client, for the Indian Legal Program, after serving as Professor of Practice for the ASU Law’s Indian Legal Program from 2008-2010. Carl Artman served as Assistant Secretary of the Interior for Indian Affairs under President George W. Bush. His office had jurisdiction over the Office of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Indian Education from 2007 to 2008. He served as the Associate Solicitor for Indian Affairs at the Department of the Interior from 2005 to 2007. An enrolled member of the Oneida Tribe of Indians of Wisconsin, Artman has worked for his tribe as Director of Federal Affairs, Chief Legal Counsel, and as Chief Operating Officer of an Oneida Tribe-owned telecommunications venture. Carl Artman served on the Board of Directors for the Library of Congress’s American Folk Life Center, Oneida Nation Electronics, Airadigm Communications, Inc., and the Personal Communications Industry Association. He served on the Board of the Presidential Board of Advisors on Tribal Colleges and Universities. Professor Artman was the Chairman of the Tribal Management Advisory Committee and the Tribal Budget Advisory Committee during his tenure as Assistant Secretary.
    [Show full text]
  • Women and the Presidency
    Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • An Open Letter to President Biden and Vice President Harris
    An Open Letter to President Biden and Vice President Harris Dear President Biden and Vice President Harris, We, the undersigned, are writing to urge your administration to reconsider the United States Army Corps of Engineers’ use of Nationwide Permit 12 (NWP12) to construct large fossil fuel pipelines. In Memphis, Tennessee, this “fast-tracked” permitting process has given the green light to the Byhalia pipeline, despite the process wholly ignoring significant environmental justice issues and the threat the project potentially poses to a local aquifer which provides drinking water to one million people. The pipeline route cuts through a resilient, low-wealth Black community, which has already been burdened by seventeen toxic release inventory facilities. The community suffers cancer rates four times higher than the national average. Subjecting this Black community to the possible health effects of more environmental degradation is wrong. Because your administration has prioritized the creation of environmental justice, we knew knowledge of this project would resonate with you. The pipeline would also cross through a municipal well field that provides the communities drinking water. To add insult to injury, this area poses the highest seismic hazard in the Southeastern United States. The Corps purports to have satisfied all public participation obligations for use of NWP 12 on the Byhalia pipeline in 2016 – years before the pipeline was proposed. We must provide forums where communities in the path of industrial projects across the country can be heard. Neighborhoods like Boxtown and Westwood in Memphis have a right to participate in the creation of their own destinies and should never be ignored.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • A Current Listing of Contents
    WOMEN'S SruDIES LIBRARIAN The University ofWisconsin System EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS VOLUME 17, NUMBER 4 WINTER 1998 Published by Phyllis Holman Weisbard Women's Studies Librarian University of Wisconsin System 430 Memorial Library / 728 State Street Madison, Wisconsin 53706 (608) 263-5754 EMINIST ERIODICALS A CURRENT LISTING OF CONTENTS Volume 17, Number 4 Winter 1998 Periodical literature is the cutting edge ofwomen's scholarship, feminist theory, and much ofwomen's culture. Feminist Periodicals: A Current Listing ofContents is published by the Office of the University of Wisconsin System Women's Studies Librarian on a quarterly basis with the intent of increasing public awareness of feminist periodicals. It is our hope that Feminisf Periodicals will serve several purposes: to keep the reader abreast of current topics in feminist literature; to increase readers' familiarity with a wide spectrum of feminist periodicals; and to provide the requisite bibliographic information should a reader wish to subscribe to a journal or to obtain a particular article at her library or through interlibrary loan. (Users will need to be aware of the limitations of the new copyright law with regard to photocopying of copyrighted materials.) Table ofcontents pages from currentissues ofmajorfeministjournalsare reproduced in each issue ofFeminist Periodicals, preceded by a comprehensive annotated listing of all journals we have selected. As publication schedules vary enormously, not every periodical will have table of contents pages reproduced in each issue of FP. The annotated listing provides the following information on each journal: 1. Year of first publication. 2. Frequency of publication. 3. U.S. SUbscription price(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 Robert P
    Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 8 | Issue 1 Article 1 Nov-2006 Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 Robert P. Watson Follow this and additional works at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws Part of the Women's Studies Commons Recommended Citation Watson, Robert P. (2006). Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008. Journal of International Women's Studies, 8(1), 1-20. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol8/iss1/1 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2006 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 By Robert P. Watson1 Abstract Women have made great progress in electoral politics both in the United States and around the world, and at all levels of public office. However, although a number of women have led their countries in the modern era and a growing number of women are winning gubernatorial, senatorial, and congressional races, the United States has yet to elect a female president, nor has anyone come close. This paper considers the prospects for electing a woman president in 2008 and the challenges facing Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice–potential frontrunners from both major parties–given the historical experiences of women who pursued the nation’s highest office.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Union Theological Seminary Towards a Liberative Ethic Against Environmental Destruction: Watching White Earth from Harlem A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Divinity at Union Theological Seminary 2021 April 19, 2021 By Davis Ogima Logan ii! Abstract Here, I demonstrate how it is that liberative ethics can be used to convince Chris- tians and U.S. Americans more broadly that it is worthwhile to protect the envi- ronment. Even if someone in the U.S. does not hold a worldview that assumes the value and sacredness of the life of non-human beings, they may still be convinced of the merits of climate protection as a necessary aspect of human liberation from oppression and undue suffering. Using the lens of Traci C. West’s disruptive Christian ethic, I look to the struggles of the White Earth Anishinaabe against En- bridge Inc.’s Line 3 Pipeline construction as is described by activist Winona LaDuke along with other Anishinaabe insights as sources of ethical knowledge that can teach the West what it means to protect the Earth. This ethical knowledge shows us that both the neoclassical and market fundamentalist models of “water protection” are left wanting under a liberationist ethical paradigm which requires that the West respect the experiences of indigenous peoples. !iii Contents Part I: Introduction .........................................................................................1 A Problem of Epic Proportions ...............................................................................3
    [Show full text]
  • From the on Inal Document. What Can I Write About?
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 470 655 CS 511 615 TITLE What Can I Write about? 7,000 Topics for High School Students. Second Edition, Revised and Updated. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-5654-1 PUB DATE 2002-00-00 NOTE 153p.; Based on the original edition by David Powell (ED 204 814). AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock no. 56541-1659: $17.95, members; $23.95, nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site: http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Classroom Learner (051) Guides Classroom Teacher (052) EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS High Schools; *Writing (Composition); Writing Assignments; *Writing Instruction; *Writing Strategies IDENTIFIERS Genre Approach; *Writing Topics ABSTRACT Substantially updated for today's world, this second edition offers chapters on 12 different categories of writing, each of which is briefly introduced with a definition, notes on appropriate writing strategies, and suggestions for using the book to locate topics. Types of writing covered include description, comparison/contrast, process, narrative, classification/division, cause-and-effect writing, exposition, argumentation, definition, research-and-report writing, creative writing, and critical writing. Ideas in the book range from the profound to the everyday to the topical--e.g., describe a terrible beauty; write a narrative about the ultimate eccentric; classify kinds of body alterations. With hundreds of new topics, the book is intended to be a resource for teachers and students alike. (NKA) Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the on inal document.
    [Show full text]
  • Report to the Arizona State Legislature
    . STATE OF ARIZONA OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT of THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM MARCH 1980 A REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 OFFICE OF THE DOUGLAS R. NORTON. CPA AUDITOR GENERAL AUDITOR GENERAL March 28, 1980 The Honorable Bruce Babbitt, Governor Members of the Arizona Legislature Mr. Joe T. Fallini, State Land Commissioner Transmitted herewith is a report of the Auditor General, A Performance Audit of the Arizona Resources Information System. This report is in response to a July 19, 1979, resolution of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee. A summary of this report is found on the blue pages at the front of the report. A response to this report by the State Land Commissioner is found on the yellow pages preceding the appendices of the report. My staff and I will be happy to meet with the appropriate legislative committees, individual legislators or other state officials to discuss or clarify any items in the report or to facilitate the implementation of the recommendations. Respectfully submitted, Douglas R. Norton Auditor General Staff: Gerald A. Silva Coni R. Good Brian C. Dalton James A. Sexton I12 NORTH CENTRAL AVENUE SUITE 600 PHOENIX, ARIZONA 85004 255-4385 OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL A PERFORMANCE AUDIT OF THE ARIZONA RESOURCES INFORMATION SYSTEM REPORT TO THE ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE REPORT 80-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS SUMMARY INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND FINDINGS FINDING I The history of the Arizona Resources Information System (ARIS) is replete with improper or nonexistent planning and unclear purpose. As a result, as of March 1, 1980, ARIS represents a $1.5 million investment in aerial photographs and maps and a relatively sophisticated computer system which performs only rudimentary record-keeping tasks.
    [Show full text]
  • Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 Robert P
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Virtual Commons - Bridgewater State University Journal of International Women's Studies Volume 8 | Issue 1 Article 1 Nov-2006 Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 Robert P. Watson Recommended Citation Watson, Robert P. (2006). Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008. Journal of International Women's Studies, 8(1), 1-20. Available at: http://vc.bridgew.edu/jiws/vol8/iss1/1 This item is available as part of Virtual Commons, the open-access institutional repository of Bridgewater State University, Bridgewater, Massachusetts. This journal and its contents may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden. ©2006 Journal of International Women’s Studies. Madam President: Progress, Problems, and Prospects for 2008 By Robert P. Watson1 Abstract Women have made great progress in electoral politics both in the United States and around the world, and at all levels of public office. However, although a number of women have led their countries in the modern era and a growing number of women are winning gubernatorial, senatorial, and congressional races, the United States has yet to elect a female president, nor has anyone come close. This paper considers the prospects for electing a woman president in 2008 and the challenges facing Hillary Clinton and Condoleezza Rice–potential frontrunners from both major parties–given the historical experiences of women who pursued the nation’s highest office.
    [Show full text]