DOCSLIB.ORG

IEA WIND 2013 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
IEA WIND 2013 Annual Report IEA WIND 2013 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency August 2014 ISBN 0-9786383-9-5 Message from the Chair elcome to the IEA Wind 2013 Annual Report of the coop- Werative research, development, and deployment (R, D&D) efforts of our mem- ber governments and organizations. IEA Wind helps advance wind energy in member coun- tries, which together represent nearly 85% of the world's wind generating capacity. In 2013, the members voted to continue this successful co- operation for another five-year term. To support this extension, they worked to report the accom- plishments of the last term and developed a stra- tegic plan for the coming period. Data from the IEA Wind member countries in 2013 illustrate key effects of improved wind plant design. Wind capacity (in gigawatts) in- creased a modest 12% but electrical production from wind (in terawatt-hours) increased a full 21%. The 270 gigawatts of wind capacity met 3.86% of the total electrical demand represented by these countries, up from 3.3% in 2012. In 2013, IEA Wind held Topical Experts Meetings focused on advances in forecasting techniques and on overcoming the challenges of deploying wind projects in hilly or forested environments. Both of these topics are important to continued expansion of wind energy. The IEA Wind members also approved Recommended Practices about social acceptance of wind energy projects, remote sensing for wind resource assessment, and on conducting wind integration studies. Looking forward, IEA Wind approved a new research task to develop recommended procedures for ground-based testing of full-size wind turbines and their components. Supporting the increased use of ground-based testing will reduce the costs of developing advanced technologies ready for the expanding market on land and offshore. The 13 co-operative research tasks of IEA wind offer members many options to gain access to research results many times greater than could be accomplished in any one country. With market challenges and ever-evolving research issues to address, IEA Wind co-operative efforts con- tinue to advance wind energy’s role in the world's energy supply. Jim Ahlgrimm Chair of the Executive Committee, 2013–2014 Contents Chapter 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 The Implementing Agreement ........................................................................................................................... 22 IEA Wind and Research Task Reports Chapter 3 Base Technology Information Exchange – Task 11 ............................................................................................ 29 Chapter 4 Wind Energy in Cold Climates – Task 19 ......................................................................................................... 33 Chapter 5 Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power – Task 25 .................................. 35 Chapter 6 Cost of Wind Energy – Task 26 ........................................................................................................................ 39 Chapter 7 Development and Deployment of Small Wind Turbine Labels for Consumers (2008–2011) and Small Wind Turbines in High Turbulence Sites (2012–2016) – Task 27 ....................................................... 41 Chapter 8 Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects – Task 28 ....................................................................................... 44 Chapter 9 Mexnext: Analysis of Wind Tunnel Measurements and Improvement of Aerodynamic Models – Task 29 .......... 46 Chapter 10 Offshore Code Comparison Collabaration (OC4) Project – Task 30 ................................................................. 49 Chapter 11 WAKEBENCH: Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models – Task 31 ............................................................ 52 Chapter 12 LIDAR: Lidar Systems for Wind Energy Deployment – Task 32 ....................................................................... 55 Chapter 13 Reliability Data: Standardizing Data Collection for Wind Turbine Reliability, Operation, and Maintenance Analyses – Task 33 ............................................................................................... 58 Chapter 14 Assessing Environmental Effects and Monitoring Efforts for Offshore and Land-Based Wind Energy System – Task 34 ...................................................................................................... 61 Chapter 15 Full-Size, Ground Testing for Wind Turbines and Their Components – Task 35................................................. 63 COUNTRY REPORTS Chapter 16 Austria .............................................................................................................................................................. 66 Chapter 17 Canada ............................................................................................................................................................. 70 Chapter 18 Chinese Wind Energy Association (CWEA) ..................................................................................................... 76 Chapter 19 Denmark .......................................................................................................................................................... 82 Chapter 20 The European Union/European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) ................................................................. 88 Chapter 21 Finland ............................................................................................................................................................. 94 Chapter 22 Germany .........................................................................................................................................................100 Chapter 23 Greece .............................................................................................................................................................106 Chapter 24 Ireland .............................................................................................................................................................108 Chapter 25 Italy .................................................................................................................................................................114 Chapter 26 Japan ................................................................................................................................................................120 Chapter 27 Republic of Korea ...........................................................................................................................................124 Chapter 28 México ............................................................................................................................................................128 Chapter 29 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................132 Chapter 30 Norway ...........................................................................................................................................................138 Chapter 31 Portugal ...........................................................................................................................................................142 Chapter 32 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................148 Chapter 33 Sweden ............................................................................................................................................................154 Chapter 34 Switzerland ......................................................................................................................................................158 Chapter 35 The United Kingdom ......................................................................................................................................162 Chapter 36 The United States ............................................................................................................................................168 APPENDICES Appendix A The Executive Committee (photo) ................................................................................................................174 Appendix B List of Executive Committee Members, Alternate Members, and Operating Agents .......................................175 Appendix C Currency Conversion Rates 2013 ..................................................................................................................178 Appendix D Abbreviations and Terminology ......................................................................................................................179 IEA Wind 3 1 Executive Summary Table 1. Key Statistics of IEA Wind Member While wind power Countries 2013 installed capacity Total installed capacity 268.84 GW Total offshore wind capacity* 6.59 GW increased 12% over Total (net) new wind capacity installed 2013 Total new 29.21 GW On land 27.20 GW the 2012 level, Offshore 2.01 GW Total annual output from wind 541.7 TWh electricity production Wind generation as a percent of IEA Wind 3.86% members’ national
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Wind Energy Resources for Electricity Generation Using WECS in North-Central Region, Nigeria
    Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 15 (2011) 1968–1976 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE Contents lists available at ScienceDirect provided by Covenant University Repository Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rser Assessment of wind energy resources for electricity generation using WECS in North-Central region, Nigeria Olayinka S. Ohunakin Mechanical Engineering Department, Covenant University, P.M.B 1023, Ota, Ogun State, Nigeria article info abstract Article history: This paper presents a statistical analysis of wind characteristics of five locations covering the North- Received 1 October 2010 Central (NC) geo-political zone, Nigeria, namely Bida, Minna, Makurdi, Ilorin and Lokoja using Weibull Accepted 4 January 2011 distribution functions on a 36-year (1971–2007) wind speed data at 10 m height collected by the mete- orological stations of NIMET in the region. The monthly, seasonal and annual variations were examined Keywords: while wind speeds at different hub heights were got by extrapolating the 10 m data using the power law. Weibull distribution The results from this investigation showed that all the five sites will only be adequate for non-connected Wind energy conversion systems electrical and mechanical applications with consideration to their respective annual mean wind speeds Mean wind speeds Wind energy of 2.747, 4.289, 4.570, 4.386 and 3.158 m/s and annual average power densities of 16.569, 94.113, 76.399, 2 Nigeria 71.823 and 26.089 W/m for Bida, Minna, Makurdi, Ilorin and Lokoja in that order.
    [Show full text]
  • Portugal 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY
    Portugal 2021 Energy Policy Review INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY The IEA examines the IEA member IEA association full spectrum countries: countries: of energy issues including oil, gas and Australia Brazil coal supply and Austria China demand, renewable Belgium India energy technologies, Canada Indonesia electricity markets, Czech Republic Morocco energy efficiency, Denmark Singapore access to energy, Estonia South Africa demand side Finland Thailand management and France much more. Through Germany its work, the IEA Greece advocates policies Hungary that will enhance the reliability, affordability Ireland and sustainability of Italy energy in its Japan 30 member countries, Korea 8 association Luxembourg countries and beyond. Mexico Netherlands New Zealand Norway Poland Portugal Please note that this Slovak Republic publication is subject to Spain specific restrictions that limit Sweden its use and distribution. The terms and conditions are Switzerland available online at Turkey www.iea.org/t&c/ United Kingdom United States This publication and any The European map included herein are without prejudice to the Commission also status of or sovereignty over participates in the any territory, to the work of the IEA delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. Source: IEA. All rights reserved. International Energy Agency Website: www.iea.org Foreword The International Energy Agency (IEA) has conducted energy policy reviews of its member countries since 1976. This peer review process supports energy policy development and encourages the exchange of international best practices. By seeing what has worked – or not – in the “real world”, these reviews help to identify policies that deliver concrete results.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Renewables: Offshore
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES: OFFSHORE OFFSHORE AN ACTION AGENDA FOR DEPLOYMENT RENEWABLES An action agenda for deployment OFFSHORE RENEWABLES A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY An action agenda for deployment A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY www.irena.org 2021 © IRENA 2021 © IRENA 2021 Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of IRENA as the source and copyright holder. Material in this publication that is attributed to third parties may be subject to separate terms of use and restrictions, and appropriate permissions from these third parties may need to be secured before any use of such material. Citation: IRENA (2021), Offshore renewables: An action agenda for deployment, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-349-6 About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) serves as the principal platform for international co-operation, a centre of excellence, a repository of policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge, and a driver of action on the ground to advance the transformation of the global energy system. An intergovernmental organisation established in 2011, IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org Acknowledgements IRENA is grateful for the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (Directorate-General for Global Affairs, DGMO) contribution that enabled the preparation of this report in the context of the Italian G20 Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report
    IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency July 2013 ISBN 0-9786383-7-9 Message from the Chair Welcome to the IEA In 2013, we expect to approve Recommended Wind 2012 Annual Re- Practices on social acceptance of wind energy proj- port of the coopera- ects, on remote wind speed sensing using SODAR tive research, develop- and LIDAR, and on conducting wind integration ment, and deployment studies. The 12 active research tasks of IEA wind will (R,D&D) efforts of our offer members many options to multiply their na- member governments and tional research programs, and a new task on ground- organizations. IEA Wind based testing of wind turbines and components is helps advance wind en- being discussed for approval in 2013. ergy in countries repre- With market challenges and ever-changing re- senting 85% of the world's search issues to address, the IEA Wind co-operation wind generating capacity. works to make wind energy an ever better green In 2012 record ca- option for the world's energy supply. Considering pacity additions (MW) these accomplishments and the plans for the coming were seen in nine member countries, and coop- years, it is with great satisfaction and confidence that erative research produced five final technical re- I hand the Chair position to Jim Ahlgrimm of the ports as well as many journal articles and confer- United States. ence papers. The technical reports include: • IEA
    [Show full text]
  • Potential Offshore Wind Energy Areas in California: an Assessment of Locations, Technology, and Costs Walter Musial, Philipp Beiter, Suzanne Tegen, and Aaron Smith
    Potential Offshore Wind Energy Areas in California: An Assessment of Locations, Technology, and Costs Walter Musial, Philipp Beiter, Suzanne Tegen, and Aaron Smith National Renewable Energy Laboratory This report is available from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2016-074. The report may be downloaded from BOEM’s Recently Completed Environmental Studies –Pacific web page at http://www.boem.gov/Pacific-Completed-Studies/. This study was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the AlliaAlliancence for Sustainable Energy, LLCLLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Technical Report NREL/TP-5000-67414 December 2016 Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Potential Offshore Wind Energy Areas in California: An Assessment of Locations, Technology, and Costs Walter Musial, Philipp Beiter, Suzanne Tegen and Aaron Smith National Renewable Energy Laboratory Prepared under IAG No. M14PG00038; task number WFHA.1005 This report is available from the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management by referencing OCS Study BOEM 2016-074. The report may be downloaded from BOEM’s Recently Completed Environmental Studies – Pacific webpage at http://www.boem.gov/Pacific-Completed-Studies/ This study was funded by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Resource Assessment Using the Wasp Software
    Downloaded from orbit.dtu.dk on: Oct 06, 2021 Wind resource assessment using the WAsP software Mortensen, Niels Gylling Publication date: 2018 Document Version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Link back to DTU Orbit Citation (APA): Mortensen, N. G. (2018). Wind resource assessment using the WAsP software. DTU Wind Energy. DTU Wind Energy E No. 174 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. 46200 Planning and Development of Wind Farms: Wind resource assessment using WAsP software Wind Energy E Report 2019 Department of Niels G. Mortensen DTU Wind Energy E-0174 December 2018 Authors: Niels G. Mortensen DTU Wind Energy E-0174 Title: Wind resource assessment using WAsP software December 2018 Department: Wind Energy Summary (max 2000 characters): These course notes are intended for the three-week course 46200 Planning and Development of Wind Farms given each year at the Technical University of Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy
    Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy March 2020 Udo Zillmann Kristian Petrick Stefanie Thoms www.airbornewindeurope.org 1 § Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy Agenda § Airborne Wind Energy – principle and concepts § Advantages § Challenges § Airborne Wind Europe § Meeting with DG RTD www.airbornewindeurope.org 2 § AWE principle and concepts Overview § Principles § Ground generation § On-board generation § Different types § Soft wing § Rigid wing § Semi-rigid wing § Other forms www.airbornewindeurope.org 3 § AWE principle Ground generation (“ground gen”) or yo-yo principle Kite flies out in a spiral and creates a tractive pull force to the tether, the winch generates electricity as it is being reeled out. Kite Tether Winch Tether is retracted back as kite flies directly back to the starting point. Return phase consumes a few % of Generator power generated, requires < 10 % of total cycle time. www.airbornewindeurope.org 4 § AWE principle On-board generation (“fly-gen”) Kite flies constantly cross-wind, power is produced in the on-board generators and evacuated through the tether www.airbornewindeurope.org 5 § AWE principle The general idea: Emulating the movement of a blade tip but at higher altitudes Source: Erc Highwind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UmN3MiR65E Makani www.airbornewindeurope.org 6 § AWE principle Fundamental idea of AWE systems • With a conventional wind turbine, the outer 20 % of the blades (the fastest moving part) generates about 60% of the power • AWE is the logical step to use only a fast flying device that emulates the blade tip. www.airbornewindeurope.org 7 § AWE concepts Concepts of our members – soft, semi-rigid and rigid wings www.airbornewindeurope.org 8 § AWE Concept Overview of technological concepts Aerostatic concepts are not in scope of this presentation Source: Ecorys 2018 www.airbornewindeurope.org 9 § AWE Concept Rigid kite with Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme
    IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme 2017 Annual Report A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Wind energy continued its strong forward momentum during the past term, with many countries setting records in cost reduction, deployment, and grid integration. In 2017, new records were set for hourly, daily, and annual wind–generated electricity, as well as share of energy from wind. For example, Portugal covered 110% of national consumption with wind-generated electricity during three hours while China’s wind energy production increased 26% to 305.7 TWh. In Denmark, wind achieved a 43% share of the energy mix—the largest share of any IEA Wind TCP member countries. From 2010-2017, land-based wind energy auction prices dropped an average of 25%, and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) fell by 21%. In fact, the average, globally-weighted LCOE for land-based wind was 60 USD/ MWh in 2017, second only to hydropower among renewable generation sources. As a result, new countries are adopting wind energy. Offshore wind energy costs have also significantly decreased during the last few years. In Germany and the Netherlands, offshore bids were awarded at a zero premium, while a Contract for Differences auction round in the United Kingdom included two offshore wind farms with record strike prices as low as 76 USD/MWh. On top of the previous achievements, repowering and life extension of wind farms are creating new opportunities in mature markets. However, other challenges still need to be addressed. Wind energy continues to suffer from long permitting procedures, which may hinder deployment in many countries. The rate of wind energy deployment is also uncertain after 2020 due to lack of policies; for example, only eight out of the 28 EU member states have wind power policies in place beyond 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment Report on Technical, Legal, Institutional and Policy Conditions
    Deliverable 2.1 ASSESSMENT REPORT ON TECHNICAL, LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY CONDITIONS This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 953040. The sole responsibility for the content of this document lies with the COME RES project and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Union. Public SUMMARY WP: 2 Name of the WP: Starting conditions, potentials, barriers and drivers for the uptake of RES based community energy Dissemination Public Due delivery date: 28 February 2021 level: Type: Report Actual delivery date: 26 February 2021 Lead beneficiary: CICERO – Center for International Climate Research Contributing beneficiaries: FUB, VITO, BBH, RESCoop.eu, ECOAZIONI, ENEA, LEIF, TU/e, KAPE, INEGI, ECORYS Lead authors: Lead authors: Karina Standal and Stine Aakre Contributing authors: Irene Alonso (ECORYS); Isabel Azevedo (INEGI); Massimo Bastiani (Ecoazioni); Nicoletta del Bufalo (ECORYS); Martina Caliano (ENEA); Sarah Delvaux (VITO); Rosaria Di Nucci (FUB); Dörte Fouquet (BBH); Vincenzo Gatta (FUB); Xenia Gimenez (ACER); Gaidis Klāvs (IPE); Michael Krug (FUB); Ivars Kudreņickis (IPE); Erik Laes (TU/e); Kristin Linnerud (CICERO); Elena De Luca (ENEA), Pouyan Maleki (ECORYS); Erika Meynaerts (VITO); Piotr Nowakowski (KAPE); Maria Grazia Oteri (ENEA); Stavroula Pappa (REScoop.eu); Roland Schumann (ACER); Dirk Vansintjan (REScoop.eu); Virna Venerucci (Ecoazioni); Ryszard Wnuk (KAPE); Aija Zučika (LEIF); Solveig Aamodt (CICERO) Document history Submitted Version Date Reviewed/approved by Date for review by V0 Karina 18.02.2021 Kristin Linnerud, CICERO 19.02.2021 Standal, CICERO V1 Stine Aakre, 19.02.2021 Pouyan Maleki, ECORYS 22.02.2021 CICERO Rosaria Di Nucci FUB-FFU 24.02.2021 V2 Karina 26.02.2021 Rosaria Di Nucci FUB-FFU 26.02.2021 Standal, CICERO i COME RES 953040 - D2.1: ASSESSMENT REPORT ON TECHNICAL, LEGAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND POLICY CONDITIONS Public ABOUT COME RES COME RES - Community Energy for the uptake of renewables in the electricity sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for the Commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems
    first save date Wednesday, November 14, 2018 - total pages 53 Reaction Paper to the Recent Ecorys Study KI0118188ENN.en.pdf1 Challenges for the commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems Draft V0.2.2 of Massimo Ippolito released the 30/1/2019 Comments to [email protected] Table of contents Table of contents Abstract Executive Summary Differences Between AWES and KiteGen Evidence 1: Tether Drag - a Non-Issue Evidence 2: KiteGen Carousel Carousel Addendum Hypothesis for Explanation: Evidence 3: TPL vs TRL Matrix - KiteGen Stem TPL Glass-Ceiling/Threshold/Barrier and Scalability Issues Evidence 4: Tethered Airfoils and the Power Wing Tethered Airfoil in General KiteGen’s Giant Power Wing Inflatable Kites Flat Rigid Wing Drones and Propellers Evidence 5: Best Concept System Architecture KiteGen Carousel 1 Ecorys AWE report available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a874f843-c137-11e8-9893-01aa75ed 71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-76863616 or ​ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329044800_Study_on_challenges_in_the_commercialisatio n_of_airborne_wind_energy_systems 1 FlyGen and GroundGen KiteGen remarks about the AWEC conference Illogical Accusation in the Report towards the developers. The dilemma: Demonstrate or be Committed to Design and Improve the Specifications Continuous Operation as a Requirement Other Methodological Errors of the Ecorys Report Auto-Breeding Concept Missing EroEI Energy Quality Concept Missing Why KiteGen Claims to be the Last Energy Reservoir Left to Humankind
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study in the Social and Historical Context of Wind Energy Development in Southern Mexico
    enticed by the wind A Case Study in the Social and Historical Context of Wind Energy Development in Southern Mexico 1 WILSON CENTER LEADERSHIP The Honorable Jane Harman, Director, President, and CEO BOARD OF TRUSTEES The Honorable Thomas R. Nides, Chairman Public members: The Honorable James H. Billington, Librarian of Congress The Honorable John F. Kerry, Secretary, U.S. Department of State David Skorton, Secretary, The Smithsonian Institution The Honorable Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education The Honorable David Ferriero, Archivist of the United States William Adams, Chairman, National Endowment for the Humanities The Honorable Sylvia Mathews Burwell, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Designated Appointee of the President from within the Federal Government The Honorable Fred P. Hochberg, Chairman and President, Export-Import Bank of the United States Private Citizen members: Peter Beshar, John T. Casteen III, Thelma Duggin, Lt. Gen. Susan Helms, USAF (Ret.), The Honorable Barry S. Jackson, Nathalie Rayes, Earl W. Stafford, Jane Watson Stetson WILSON NATIONAL CABINET The Honorable Joseph Gildenhorn and Willem Kooyker Mrs. Alma Gildenhorn, Co-Chairs The Honorable Raymond Learsy and Eddie and Sylvia Brown *Ms. Melva Bucksbaum Dr. Armeane and Mrs. Mary Choksi Linda B. and Tobia G. Mercuro The Honorable Sue Cobb and The Honorable Thomas R. Nides The Honorable Chuck Cobb Nathalie Rayes Lester Crown Wayne Rogers Thelma Duggin B. Francis Saul II Judi Flom Ginny and L.E. Simmons Sander R. Gerber Diana Davis Spencer Harman Family Foundation Jane Watson Stetson Susan Hutchison Leo Zickler Frank F. Islam *Deceased The Winds of History In 1946, Basil Nikiforoff et al.
    [Show full text]