Chapter 9: Renewables 1. BWK: Erneuerbare Energien – Stand 2013 (Auszug) (2014) 2. Scientific American: A Path to Sustainable Energy by 2030 (2009) 3. Vattenfall: Wind Energy in Europe (2011) 4. NREL: 2010 Cost of Wind Energy Review – Synopsis (2012) 5. Alstom Wind Turbines for Onshore and Offshore Operation (2014) 6. Analysis of the Conversion of Ocean Wind Power into Hydrogen (2013) 7. Design and Experimental Characterization of a Pumping Kite Power System 8. MPC for airborne wind energy generation (2013) 9. Laddermill sail – a new concept in sailing (2007) 10. BWK: Effizienter Strom aus der Sonne (2011) 11. Concentrated Solar Power Solutions by Alstom 12. Design and implementation of an innovative 190ºC solar ORC pilot plant at the PSA (2011) 13. Tidal Power Solutions by Alstom 14. Performance Analysis of OTEC Plants With Multilevel Organic Rankine Cycle and Solar Hybridization (2013) 15. Wege zur nachhaltigen Energieversorgung – Herausforderungen an Speicher und thermische Kraftwerke (2012) 16. BWK: Energiespeicher (2015) 17. Wasserstoff – Das Speichermedium für erneuerbare Energien (2012) 18. Neuer Entwicklungsansatz bei Druckluftspeichern (2013) 19. Druckluftspeicherkraftwerk mit Dampfkreislauf (2016) 20. Wirtschaftliche Bewertung von Stromspeichertechnologien (2012) ENERGY A PATH TO SUSTAINABLE ENERGY BY 2030 Wind, water and n December leaders from around the world for at least a decade, analyzing various pieces of will meet in Copenhagen to try to agree on the challenge. Most recently, a 2009 Stanford solar technologies Icutting back greenhouse gas emissions for University study ranked energy systems accord- can provide decades to come. The most effective step to im- ing to their impacts on global warming, pollu- 100 percent of the plement that goal would be a massive shift away tion, water supply, land use, wildlife and other from fossil fuels to clean, renewable energy concerns. The very best options were wind, so- ) dam world’s energy, sources. If leaders can have confi dence that such lar, geothermal, tidal and hydroelectric pow- ( eliminating all a transformation is possible, they might commit er—all of which are driven by wind, water or to an historic agreement. We think they can. sunlight (referred to as WWS). Nuclear power, fossil fuels. A year ago former vice president Al Gore coal with carbon capture, and ethanol were all Photos Aurora HERE’S HOW threw down a gauntlet: to repower America poorer options, as were oil and natural gas. The with 100 percent carbon-free electricity within study also found that battery-electric vehicles 10 years. As the two of us started to evaluate the and hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles recharged by HEINSOHN BILL ); feasibility of such a change, we took on an even WWS options would largely eliminate pollution wind farm wind larger challenge: to determine how 100 percent from the transportation sector. ( of the world’s energy, for all purposes, could be Our plan calls for millions of wind turbines, supplied by wind, water and solar resources, by water machines and solar installations. The By Mark Z. Jacobson Photos Aurora as early as 2030. Our plan is presented here. numbers are large , but the scale is not an insur- and Mark A. Delucchi Scientists have been building to this moment mountable hurdle; society has achieved massive LEE JOHN 58 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 2009 transformations before. During World War II, tion, operation and decommissioning. For ex- the U.S. retooled automobile factories to pro- ample, when burned in vehicles, even the most KEY CONCEPTS duce 300,000 aircraft, and other countries pro- ecologically acceptable sources of ethanol create duced 486,000 more. In 1956 the U.S. began air pollution that will cause the same mortality ■ Supplies of wind and solar building the Interstate Highway System, which level as when gasoline is burned. Nuclear power energy on accessible land after 35 years extended for 47,000 miles, chang- results in up to 25 times more carbon emissions dwarf the energy con- sumed by people around ing commerce and society. than wind energy, when reactor construction the globe. Is it feasible to transform the world’s energy and uranium refi ning and transport are consid- systems? Could it be accomplished in two de- ered. Carbon capture and sequestration technol- ■ The authors’ plan calls cades? The answers depend on the technologies ogy can reduce carbon dioxide emissions from for 3.8 million large wind chosen, the availability of critical materials, and coal-fi red power plants but will increase air pol- turbines, 90,000 solar plants, and numerous economic and political factors. lutants and will extend all the other deleterious geothermal, tidal and effects of coal mining, transport and processing, rooftop photovoltaic Clean Technologies Only because more coal must be burned to power the installations worldwide. Renewable energy comes from enticing sources: capture and storage steps. Similarly, we consider ■ wind, which also produces waves; water, which only technologies that do not present signifi cant The cost of generating and transmitting power includes hydroelectric, tidal and geothermal ener- waste disposal or terrorism risks. would be less than the gy (water heated by hot underground rock); and In our plan, WWS will supply electric power projected cost per sun, which includes photovoltaics and solar pow- for heating and transportation—industries that kilowatt-hour for fossil- er plants that focus sunlight to heat a fl uid that will have to revamp if the world has any hope of fuel and nuclear power. drives a turbine to generate electricity. Our plan slowing climate change. We have assumed that ■ Shortages of a few ) includes only technologies that work or are close most fossil-fuel heating (as well as ovens and specialty materials, to working today on a large scale, rather than stoves) can be replaced by electric systems and along with lack of solar panels solar those that may exist 20 or 30 years from now. that most fossil-fuel transportation can be re- political will, loom as To ensure that our system remains clean, we placed by battery and fuel-cell vehicles. Hydro- the greatest obstacles. consider only technologies that have near-zero gen, produced by using WWS electricity to split emissions of greenhouse gases and air pollutants water (electrolysis), would power fuel cells and —The Editors HO/REUTERS/CORBIS ( HO/REUTERS/CORBIS over their entire life cycle, including construc- be burned in airplanes and by industry. www.ScientificAmerican.com SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN 59 RENEWABLE POWER AVAILABLE POWER NEEDED IN READILY ACCESSIBLE LOCATIONS WORLDWIDE IN 2030 Plenty of Supply Today the maximum power consumed world- WATER 2 TW wide at any given moment is about 12.5 trillion watts (terawatts, or TW), according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. The agen- cy projects that in 2030 the world will require WIND 40–85 TW 16.9 T W of power as global population and liv- IF CONVENTIONAL SUPPLY 16.9 TW ing standards rise, with about 2.8 TW in the U.S. The mix of sources is similar to today’s, heavily dependent on fossil fuels. If, however, the planet were powered entirely by WWS, with no fossil-fuel or biomass combustion, an intrigu- OR ing savings would occur. Global power demand would be only 11.5 TW, and U.S. demand would be 1.8 TW. That decline occurs because, in most cases, electrifi cation is a more effi cient way to use energy. For example, only 17 to 20 percent of the energy in gasoline is used to move a vehi- cle (the rest is wasted as heat), whereas 75 to 86 IF RENEWABLE percent of the electricity delivered to an electric SUPPLY (MORE vehicle goes into motion. EFFICIENT) Even if demand did rise to 16.9 TW, WWS 11.5 TW sources could provide far more power. Detailed studies by us and others indicate that energy from the wind, worldwide, is about 1,700 TW. Solar, alone, offers 6,500 TW. Of course, wind and sun out in the open seas, over high moun- tains and across protected regions would not be available. If we subtract these and low-wind ar- eas not likely to be developed, we are still left with 40 to 85 TW for wind and 580 TW for so- lar, each far beyond future human demand. Yet currently we generate only 0.02 TW of wind power and 0.008 TW of solar. These sources hold an incredible amount of untapped potential. The other WWS technologies will help create a fl exible range of options. Although all the sources can expand greatly, for practical rea- sons, wave power can be extracted only near coastal areas. Many geothermal sources are too deep to be tapped economically. And even though hydroelectric power now exceeds all other WWS sources, most of the suitable large reservoirs are already in use. MW – MEGAWATT = 1 MILLION WATTS GW – GIGAWATT = 1 BILLION WATTS TW – TERAWATT = 1 TRILLION WATTS SOLAR 580 TW ➥ The Editors welcome responses to this article. To comment and to see more detailed calculations, go to www.Scientifi cAmerican.com/sustainable-energy 60 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN November 2009 RENEWABLE INSTALLATIONS REQUIRED WORLDWIDE WATER 1.1 TW (9% OF SUPPLY) 490,000 TIDAL TURBINES – 1 MW* – < 1% IN PLACE *size of unit 5,350 GEOTHERMAL PLANTS – 100 MW – 2% IN PLACE The Plan: Power Plants Required Clearly, enough renewable energy exists. How, 900 then, would we transition to a new infrastruc- HYDROELECTRIC PLANTS – 1,300 MW – 70% IN PLACE ture to provide the world with 11.5 TW? We have chosen a mix of technologies emphasizing wind and solar, with about 9 percent of demand met by mature water-related methods. (Other 3,800,000 combinations of wind and solar could be as WIND TURBINES – 5 MW – 1% IN PLACE successful .) Wind supplies 51 percent of the demand, pro- vided by 3.8 million large wind turbines (each WIND 5.8 TW rated at fi ve megawatts) worldwide.