Decision No. 2013 Nzenvc 59 of Resource Consent. Applications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Decision No. 2013 Nzenvc 59 of Resource Consent. Applications BEFORE THE ENVIRONMENT COURT Decision No. 2013 NZEnvC 59 of resource consent. applications IN THE MATTER directly referred to the Court under Section 8.7C(1) of the Resource Management Act 1991 MERIDIAN ENERGY LIMITED BY (ENV -2011-CHC-000090) Applicant Hearing dates: 27, 28 August, 2012; 3-7, 10- 14, 24-28 September, 2012; 1-5, 15-17, 23 October, 2012. Site visits: 29 August, 19 September (Te Uku), 14 & 24 October, 2012 Court: Judge M Harland Commissioner MP Oliver Deputy Commissioner B Gollop Date: 15 Apri12013 INTERIM DECISION A. The applications for resource consent are granted subject to amended conditions. B. We record for the ·avoidance of doubt, that this decision is final in respect of the confirmation of the grant of the resource consents (on amended conditions) but is interim in respect of the precise wording of the conditions, and in particular the details relating to the Community Fund condition(s). C. We direct the Hurunui District Council and the Canterbury Regional Council to submit to the Court amended conditions of consent giving effect to this decision by 17 May 2013. In preparing the amended conditions the Councils are to consult with the other parties, particularly in relation to the condition(s) relating to the Community Fund. D. If any party wishes to make submissions in relation to the Community Fund conditions, these are to be filed by 17 May 2013. E. Costs are reserved. Hurunui District Council Respondent Canterbury Regional Council Respondent Appearances: Mr A Beatson, Ms N Garvan and Ms E Taffs for Meridian Energy Ltd Mr K Smith and Ms J Silcock for the Hurunui District Council Ms M Dysart for the Canterbury Regional Council Mr E Pyle for Wind Energy Association Mr H Turnbull for himself Mr M Wallace for Glenmark Community Against Wind Turbines Incorporated Mr M Archbold for himself Mr A Baxter Mr J Carr for Tipapa Limited Mr G Higginson for himself Mrs K Fitzimmons for herself Mrs A Marr for herself Mrs K McLauchlan for herself Mr G and Mrs M McLean for themselves Ms B Meares for herself Mr D Meares for himself and Mrs V Meares Mrs E Messervy for herself Mr M Messervy for himself Mrs H Pankhurst for herself Mrs J Symonds for herself Mr G Thomas for himself Ms P Vincent for herself Contents Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 5 The proposal ........................................................................................................................ 6 What is proposed? ........................................................................................................ 6 Where is the wind farm to be situated? ........................................................................ 8 What is the extent of opposition to the proposal? .................................... ;................. 10 Legal framework ............................................................................................................... 14 Consents sought .......................................................................................................... 14 The RMA and relevant statutory instruments ............................................................ 15 The actual and potential effects of the proposal on the environment ............................... 23 What are the potentially positive effects on the environment? ...................................... 24 Renewable energy ..................................................................................... :................ 24 The demand for electricity and the need for security of supply ................................. 28 Economic benefits ...................................................................................................... 31 Conservation initiatives and other technologies ......................................................... 33 What are the potentially adverse effects on the environment? ...................................... 33 Landscape and visual amenity .................................................................................... 34 Noise ........................................................................................................................... 52 Health .......................................................................................................................... 69 Traffic and access ....................................................................................................... 85 Construction, Erosion, Sediment Control and Groundwater, and Fire ...................... 96 Ecology ..................................................................................................................... 100 Recreation and Tourism ........................................................................................... 122 Property values ......................................................................................................... 130 Proposed conditions of consent ...................................................................................... 139 Part 2 matters- Exercise of discretion ........................................................................... 146 Result .............................................................................................................................. 147 s INTRODUCTION [1] Centre Hill and its surrounding ridgelines in. the Hurunui District in North Canterbury are landmarks of some significance to those who live locally, particularly at Glenmark, Greta Valley, Omihi and Scargill. They also attract a world-class wind resource, which makes the area attractive for wind energy generation, a form of electricity generation favoured by national policy because it is renewable. Recognising this, and after a number of years of investigation, Meridian Energy Limited ("Meridian") has applied to construct, operate and maintain a 33 turbine wind farm in the area near to the recently consented (but not yet co:nstructed) Mt Cass wind farm, but to do so, it requires a number of resource consents from the Hurunui District Council ("the HDC") and the Canterbury Regional Council ("the CRC"). Meridian successfully applied to directly refer the applications for resource consent to the Environment Court for hearing. 1 Accordingly there were no first instance hearings before the HDC and CRC. As a result, there was a high level of direct local community and resident involvement at this hearing. Many of the parties were self-represented, and many issues were raised. [2] The local opposition to Meridian's proposal was largely coordinated through the Glenmark Community Against Wind Turbines Incorporated ("the Society"). A number of the members of the Society, however, also appeared as individual submitters during the hearing to advance matters specific to their individual interests. The other main opposition came from Tipapa Limited ("Tipapa"), represented by Mr John Carr, its director and shareholder. As well as owning land which is grazed, Tipapa's renovated. homestead, gardens and woolshed at Greta Valley operate as a high-end tourist destination and functions centre, and it is increasingly popular as a wedding venue. All of those in opposition asked the Court to decline Meridian's applications for resource consent. [3] It was common ground that Meridian's proposal should be assessed as a discretionary activity under s104 of the Resource Management Act 1991 ("the RMA"). Broadly speaking, we are required to consider any actual and potential effects on the environment of allowing the activity and any relevant provisions of a number of listed statutory planning documents. Overall we must assess whether the proposal will meet the purpose of the Act, which is to promote the sustainable management of natural and .,..,.. .... ~---..,~.,)2hysical resources. ~/cx_!\L OF ).~ · ( '~~~~~~~~rs ant to s87C (1)ofthe Resource Management Act 1991 . i I ~~·~~ 1·~~kl/.!.~fJ ~ o ' rr, \ /-•·J ~: (\ ... ,·'' r···• ~~ .. ...,.,, ,-..,.c; s;, f., I .,..• .,. ~ " •.. ~~,~·t_~'·.' 1:'~ 1 ~ ?. .J .':\\1Afti\r1iMetid~anJ-Interim Decision \ ..-'1J ..... }.,,&·":.(· 1'-i •.-'J.I'r-, ~'· l_\ (:? \ ·-.::r~';{tl~'·~~--.s:~~;w;;i'' 1 , ~J ,_~ ~t-:-~ '-... '"'7fH:_:_:J.:,.l-''' ·• / \,. ,. ~ "· ·/l~~ '-. /<"' ··~:-~ tl '\.. '<(~)/- ____.. _ '<;_~·'/ . -....,:... ~7 CO\J?.\ ~/ ·~"'-"-'l•~• ., . ....,....,...-r# . I 6 [4] Those opposed to the wind farm referred to it as an industrial activity that did not fit within the local rural environment, which they described as tranquil, peaceful and quiet. They were concerned that their amenity values would be adversely affected and their property values diminished should the wind farm proceed. Specifically, they were concerned that the wind farm would generate adverse effects relating to landscape and visual amenity, noise, health, traffic and ecological values. Tipapa was concerned that its business activities would be adversely affected and others were concerned that recreation and tourism activities nearby would also be adversely affected. The cumulative effect of having two wind farms (Hurunui and Mt Cass) nearby was a particular focus for some. It was contended that these potentially adv_erse effects would all be unable to be avoided, remedied or properly mitigated. [5] Meridian highlighted the positive benefits to the local, regional and national economies arising from the proposal, including the fact that the energy sought to be generated is from a renewable source. Whilst aclmowledging there might be some adverse effects,
Recommended publications
  • Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand, Tokyo, Japan
    APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Renewable Energy Grid Integration in New Zealand Workshop on Grid Interconnection Issues for Renewable Energy 12 October, 2010 Tokyo, Japan RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Coverage Electricity Generation in New Zealand, The Electricity Market, Grid Connection Issues, Technical Solutions, Market Solutions, Problems Encountered Key Points. RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity in New Zealand 7 Major Generators, 1 Transmission Grid owner – the System Operator, 29 Distributors, 610 km HVDC link between North and South Islands, Installed Capacity 8,911 MW, System Generation Peak about 7,000 MW, Electricity Generated 42,000 GWh, Electricity Consumed, 2009, 38,875 GWh, Losses, 2009, 346 GWh, 8.9% Annual Demand growth of 2.4% since 1974 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Installed Electricity Capacity, 2009 (MW) Renew able Hydro 5,378 60.4% Generation Geothermal 627 7.0% Wind 496 5.6% Wood 18 0.2% Biogas 9 0.1% Total 6,528 73.3% Non-Renew able Gas 1,228 13.8% Generation Coal 1,000 11.2% Diesel 155 1.7% Total 2,383 26.7% Total Generation 8,91 1 100.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity Generation, 2009 (GWh) Renew able Hydro 23,962 57.0% Generation Geothermal 4,542 10.8% Wind 1,456 3.5% Wood 323 0.8% Biogas 195 0.5% Total 30,478 72.6% Non-Renew able Gas 8,385 20.0% Generation Coal 3,079 7.3% Oil 8 0.0% Waste Heat 58 0.1% Total 11,530 27.4% Total Generation 42,008 1 00.0% RDL APEC EGNRET Grid Integration Workshop, 2010 Electricity from Renewable Energy New Zealand has a high usage of Renewable Energy • Penetration 67% , • Market Share 64% Renewable Energy Penetration Profile is Changing, • Hydroelectricity 57% (decreasing but seasonal), • Geothermal 11% (increasing), • 3.5% Wind Power (increasing).
    [Show full text]
  • NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS
    Newsletter of the New Zealand Issue 69 Geotechnical Society Inc. 1SSN 0111–6851 NZ Geomechanics News June 2005 NEW ZEALAND GEOMECHANICS NEWS JUNE 2005, ISSUE 69 CONTENTS Chairman’s Corner . 2 Editorial Good Reasons to be Good - P Glassey . 3 Letters to the Editor . 4 Editorial Policy. 4 Report from the Secretary . 6 International Society Reports ISSMGE . 7 IAEG . 8 ISRM . 10 ISRM - Rocha Medal . 11 ISRM - National Group website . 12 NZGS Branch Activities . 13 Conference Adverts . 20 Reviews Degrees of Belief. 23 Mapping in Engineering Geology . 24 Geotechnical Engineering Education . 25 Project News Banda Aceh - 8 Weeks After Disaster Struck . 26 Strengthening Ngaio Gorge Road Walls . 34 Te Apiti Wind Farm: Megawatt-class Machines aided by Geotechnical Expertise. 37 Geotechnical Investigations and Testing for Wellington Inner City Bypass . 40 Standards, Law and Industry News Why doesn’t New Zealand have a Geotechnical Database? . 42 Breaking News 18 May rainstorm Damage, Bay of Plenty . 43 Technical Articles Numerical Analysis in Geotechnical Engineering Final Part . 44 The Bob Wallace Column . 49 Company Profiles Keith Gillepsie Associates . 50 Boart Longyear Drillwell . 52 Member Profiles Merrick Taylor . 54 Ann Williams . 55 Events Diary . 57 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Information . 60 New Zealand Geotechnical Society Inc Publications 2005 . 63 Advertising Information . 64 Cover photo: Landslide debris, Tauranga as a result of the 18 May 2005 rainstorm Photo Credit: Mauri McSaveney, GNS New Zealand Geomechanics News CHAIRMAN’S
    [Show full text]
  • Meridian Energy ERU 03-06 PDD Stage 2 Final
    Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously the Lower North Island Wind Project) Project Design Document ERUPT 3 Project: Te Apiti Wind Farm Project (Previously Lower North Island Wind Project) Reference: ERU 03/06 Document: Baseline Study Version: 2 Programme: ERUPT 3 Stage 2 Date: August 2003 1 PROJECT DETAILS 1.1 Project characteristics Supplier Company name Meridian Energy Limited Address 15 Allen Street Zip Code & City Address Wellington Postal Address PO Box 10-840 Zip Code & City Postal Address Wellington Country New Zealand Contact Person Ms Tracy Dyson Job Title Sustainable Energy and Climate Change Advisor Tele phone Number +64 4 381 1271 Fax Number +64 4 381 1201 E-mail [email protected] Bank/Giro Number Upon Request Bank WestpacTrust No. of Employees 202 Company’s Main Activity Electricity Generation, Retailing, Trading CPV Number WN/938552 Registration Number Professional or Trade Not Applicable Register Date of Registration 17th March 1999 Local contacts and other parties involved The local contact will be Meridian Energy Ltd who will be the project owner, project manager and project developer. Te Apiti Wind Farm Project Design Document 2003 Page 2 of 67 Confidential 20th August 2003 1.2 Project Abstract Project Title Te Apiti Wind Farm Host country New Zealand Abstract Meridian Energy, New Zealand’s largest generator of electricity from renewable resources and a state owned enterprise would like to develop a wind generation project in the lower North Island of New Zealand. This project is called the Te Apiti Wind Farm and will have a capacity of between 82.5-96.25 MW.
    [Show full text]
  • Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report
    Castle Hill Wind Farm: Electricity-Related Effects Report Prepared for Genesis Energy July 2011 Concept Consulting Group Limited Level 6, Featherston House 119-121 Featherston St PO Box 10-045, Wellington, NZ www.concept.co.nz Contents 1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................6 1.1 Purpose..................................................................................................................................6 1.2 Information sources ..............................................................................................................6 1.3 Concept Consulting Group.....................................................................................................6 2 The Castle Hill Wind Farm Project....................................................................................7 2.1 Project Outline.......................................................................................................................7 2.2 Key Electrical Parameters for CHWF......................................................................................7 3 Electricity in the New Zealand Economy..........................................................................8 3.1 Electricity and Consumer Energy...........................................................................................8 3.2 Electricity consumption and supply in New Zealand.............................................................9 3.3 Historical Electricity Demand
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape & Visual Impact Part 5
    Perception and Public Consultation SECTION 14 14.1 Perception People’s perception of wind farms is an important issue to consider as the attitude or opinion of individuals adds significant weight to the level of potential visual impact. The opinions and perception of individuals from the local community and broader area were sought and provided through a range of consultation activities. These included: • Community Open House Events; • Community Engagement Research (Telephone Survey); and • Individual stakeholder meetings. The attitudes or opinions of individuals toward wind farms can be shaped or formed through a multitude of complex social and cultural values. Whilst some people would accept and support wind farms in response to global or local environmental issues, others would find the concept of wind farms completely unacceptable. Some would support the environmental ideals of wind farm development as part of a broader renewable energy strategy but do not consider them appropriate for their regional or local area. It is unlikely that wind farm projects would ever conform or be acceptable to all points of view; however, research within Australia as well as overseas consistently suggests that the majority of people who have been canvassed do support the development of wind farms. Wind farms are generally easy to recognise in the landscape and to take advantage of available wind resources are more often located in elevated and exposed locations. The geometrical form of a wind turbine is a relatively simple one and can be visible for some distance beyond a wind farm, and the level of visibility can be accentuated by the repetitive or repeating pattern of multiple wind turbines within a local area.
    [Show full text]
  • Did Impact Assessment Influence the Decision Makers? IAIA'12
    Did Impact Assessment influence the decision makers? The Turitea wind farm proposal in New Zealand IAIA’12 – Porto,,g Portugal Theme Forum: Even renewables may not be acceptable: Negotiating community responses to wind energy through impact assessment The setting Wind farms near the city of Palmerston North: existing (3), permitted (1) and proposed (1) Te Apiti wind farm as seen from near the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm as seen from the village of Ashhurst Tararua wind farm – stage 1 – lattice towers. Sheep farming continues. Tararua wind farm (3-bladed, 2MW) and Te Rere Hau wind farm (2-bladed, 500kW) City of Palmerston North from Te Rere Hau wind farm Te Rere Hau wind farm from Palmerston North City Which communities? 1st wind farm: built by Palmerston North lines company to supply Palmerston North Now: all wind farms supply the national (grid) community Rural-residential communities closest to the windfarms? The next proposal – wider community context The next proposal – localised community context The next proposal – localised community context SIA activities: Multiple-method approach Surveys (226 & 212 respondents) •Random survey of city residents (Citizen Panel) •Spatially targeted survey of people living within 5km of an existing turbine (ex-post survey) Focus groups (41 participants) •1 for landowners with turbines; •4 for near neighbours without turbines Interviews (34) •Recreation groups, tourism sector, wind farm companies, construction/servicing companies, regional economic development interests, iwi Declining levels
    [Show full text]
  • BOT News Hurunui Primary Schools Writing Competition Results for 2019
    Confident, Respectful, Curious Kids Tuesday 20th August 2019 Community Issue: Term3 —Week 5 23 Princes Street Principal: Yvonne Blair Waikari 7420 Ph: 03 3144250 Ph: 03 3144250 Email: [email protected] Fax: 03 3144350 Board Chair: Jenny Cholmondeley Email: [email protected] Webpage: waikari.school.nz Tena Koutou Katoa Hurunui Primary Schools Ski Trip—THIS FRIDAY Writing Competition Ski Trip: Please see the attached equipment list. We have 16 children and 10 adults going skiing. Let’s all Results for 2019 hope for good weather. We will be leaving at 8 a.m. This year the judges said that the narratives were ex- sharp. Please be at school by 7:45. I will let you know as early as possible if this trip is cancelled and everyone is tremely well written with excellent descriptive language. skating It would speed things up if children know their Congratulations to the following students who placed. shoe size. I will be the teacher in charge of the ski trip. Year 1—2 1st Jens Grove Hurunui College Skate Trip—This FRIDAY 2nd Mason Rodgers Hurunui College Remember to bring a warm jacket, gloves, warm long 3rd = Max Beach Waikari School socks and a bike helmet. (They can supply if you haven’t got one) I would also include a change of socks and a 3rd= Patrick Frame Hurunui College towel. Skaters will be leaving at 9:15. There are 16 chil- Year 3—4 dren and 8 adults going skating. Please make sure your 1st Amelia Saric Hanmer Springs School children know their shoe size as this will also speed 2nd Eva Roberts Rotherham School things up.
    [Show full text]
  • II~I6 866 ~II~II~II C - -- ~,~,- - --:- -- - 11 I E14c I· ------~--.~~ ~ ---~~ -- ~-~~~ = 'I
    Date Printed: 04/22/2009 JTS Box Number: 1FES 67 Tab Number: 123 Document Title: Your Guide to Voting in the 1996 General Election Document Date: 1996 Document Country: New Zealand Document Language: English 1FES 10: CE01221 E II~I6 866 ~II~II~II C - -- ~,~,- - --:- -- - 11 I E14c I· --- ---~--.~~ ~ ---~~ -- ~-~~~ = 'I 1 : l!lG,IJfi~;m~ I 1 I II I 'DURGUIDE : . !I TOVOTING ! "'I IN l'HE 1998 .. i1, , i II 1 GENERAl, - iI - !! ... ... '. ..' I: IElJIECTlON II I i i ! !: !I 11 II !i Authorised by the Chief Electoral Officer, Ministry of Justice, Wellington 1 ,, __ ~ __ -=-==_.=_~~~~ --=----==-=-_ Ji Know your Electorate and General Electoral Districts , North Island • • Hamilton East Hamilton West -----\i}::::::::::!c.4J Taranaki-King Country No,", Every tffort Iws b«n mude co etlSull' tilt' accuracy of pr'rty iiI{ C<llldidate., (pases 10-13) alld rlec/oralt' pollillg piau locations (past's 14-38). CarloJmpllr by Tt'rmlilJk NZ Ltd. Crown Copyr(~"t Reserved. 2 Polling booths are open from gam your nearest Polling Place ~Okernu Maori Electoral Districts ~ lil1qpCli1~~ Ilfhtg II! ili em g} !i'1l!:[jDCli1&:!m1Ib ~ lDIID~ nfhliuli ili im {) 6m !.I:l:qjxDJGmll~ ~(kD~ Te Tai Tonga Gl (Indudes South Island. Gl IIlllx!I:i!I (kD ~ Chatham Islands and Stewart Island) G\ 1D!m'llD~- ill Il".ilmlIllltJu:t!ml amOOvm!m~ Q) .mm:ro 00iTIP West Coast lID ~!Ytn:l -Tasman Kaikoura 00 ~~',!!61'1 W 1\<t!funn General Electoral Districts -----------IEl fl!rIJlmmD South Island l1:ilwWj'@ Dunedin m No,," &FJ 'lb'iJrfl'llil:rtlJD __ Clutha-Southland ------- ---~--- to 7pm on Saturday-12 October 1996 3 ELECTl~NS Everything you need to know to _.""iii·lli,n_iU"· , This guide to voting contains everything For more information you need to know about how to have your call tollfree on say on polling day.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydroelectricity Or Wild Rivers? Climate Change Versus Natural Heritage
    1 Hydroelectricity or wild rivers? Climate change versus natural heritage May 2012 2 Acknowledgements The Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment would like to express her gratitude to those who assisted with the research and preparation of this report, with special thanks to her staff who worked so tirelessly to bring it to completion. Photography Cover: Mike Walen - Aratiatia Rapids This document may be copied provided that the source is acknowledged. This report and other publications by the Parliamentary Commissioner for the Environment are available at: www.pce.parliament.nz 3 Contents Contents 2 1 Introduction 7 3 1.1 The purpose of this report 8 1.2 Structure of report 9 1.3 What this report does not cover 9 2 Harnessing the power of water – hydroelectricity in New Zealand 11 2.1 Early hydroelectricity 13 2.2 The big dam era 15 2.3 Hydroelectricity in the twenty-first century 21 3 Wild and scenic rivers - a short history 23 3.1 Rivers were first protected in national parks 24 3.2 Legislation to protect wild and scenic rivers 25 3.3 Developing a national inventory 26 3.4 Water bodies of national importance 28 4 How wild and scenic rivers are protected 29 4.1 Protecting rivers using water conservation orders 29 4.2 Protecting rivers through conservation land 37 5 The electricity or the river – how the choice is made 43 5.1 Obtaining resource consents 44 5.2 Getting agreement to build on conservation land 47 6 Environment versus environment 49 6.1 What are the environmental benefits? 49 6.2 Comparing the two – a different approach
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Feasibility Analysis of Renewable Energy Supply Systems in a Small Grid Connected Resort
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 5-2009 Case study: Feasibility analysis of renewable energy supply systems in a small grid connected resort Jody Robins University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Hospitality Administration and Management Commons, Oil, Gas, and Energy Commons, Sustainability Commons, and the Technology and Innovation Commons Repository Citation Robins, Jody, "Case study: Feasibility analysis of renewable energy supply systems in a small grid connected resort" (2009). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 633. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/1754532 This Professional Paper is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Professional Paper in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Professional Paper has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Case Study Feasibility Analysis of Renewable Energy Supply Systems in a Small Grid Connected Resort By Jody Robins Master of Science in Hotel Administration University of Nevada Las Vegas 2009 Master of Science in Hotel Administration William F. Harrah College of Hotel Administration Graduate College University of Nevada, Las Vegas May 2009 2 Table of Contents Table of Contents ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • If You Are Thinking of Buying, Selling Or Renting, Call Your Local Harcourts Hanmer Springs Ofice Today!
    If you are thinking of buying, selling or renting, call your local Harcourts Hanmer Springs Ofice today! 03 315 7084 [email protected] Your home for local property Shop 3, 12a Conical Hill Road Four Seasons Realty 2017 Ltd | Licensed Agent REAA 2008 Four Seasons Realty Family Violence – It’s Not OK – get help on 0800 456 450 Women’s Refuge 0800 REFUGE (733 843) For emergencies ring 111, North Canterbury Police 105 Lifeline 0800 543 354, Youthline 0800 376 633 or text HELP (4357) for free, 24/7, confidenOal support . Hanmer 0274 337 985 Christchurch, Hanmer Springs, Kaikoura, Cheviot, Waiau, Rotherham, Waikari, Waipara Amberley, Rangiora, Greta Valley, Culverden [email protected] ! Peter Moody Phone 021 927 037 E: [email protected] For all your flooring needs. OPINION Ah, the joys of doing the Pinkie. The subject of Covid and the anti-vaxxers has brought something out of the woodwork, although I am none too sure what it is that came out. Electronic Version I haven’t had so much fun since someone left a turd in my letter box when I was living in Woodbank Road and Each week we will send you a constantly carping about the dirt the developers were reminder to click on raising at the expense of the street’s clean washing. Someone has taken it upon themself to keep me informed h\p://thepinkie.co.nz/ of anti-vax disinformation and has been doing a regular drop in my letterbox of a pamphlet produced by an organisation calling themselves Voices for Freedom.
    [Show full text]
  • Waipara School Being the Best W E Can Be Ekea Ka Tiritiri O Te Moana
    22 July 2019 Waipara School 2 Loffhagen Drive, P.O. Box 11, Waipara 7447.Phone (03) 3146814 Fax (03) 3146815 Email: [email protected] Website: www.waipara.school.nz o te moana ONE HUNDRED DAYS AT SCHOOL FOR 2019 On Thursday 4 July, Harakeke celebrated having been at school for 100 days this year and above are one hundred lollies that we divided amongst all of the children present in the school on that day! Ekea ka tiritiri o te moana te o tiritiri ka Ekea beingthebestwe can be ekeakatiritiri BOT Meeting The next meeting of the Waipara School BOT will be on Thursday 25 July, 6.30pm in Kanuka – all parents are welcome to attend. The Board of Trustees members are: Victoria McGuckin, Nathn Trethowen, Deb Dellaway-Curtis, Karen Duncan, Matt Ford, Scott Holland and Di Officer. A CHALLENGE FOR YOU Play a board game as a family The kindly donated by the PTA Chocolate Fish have been awarded to: Noah Trethowen – trying hard at adding tens and ones Will Ford – great work in adding two digit numbers Aria Holland – creative artwork and ideas Henri Morgan – working hard in Maths, especially place value Noah van der Lee – conscientious milk and ICT monitor Haidee Ottaway – having a positive attitude and being the best she can be Alice Hoban – challenging herself with trying new things Mielah MacGregor – being the best she can be Kyla Trethowen – super effort in reading Savannah Hammond – super worker, giving 100% effort in all subject areas Rowan Morgan – first to complete the cryptic crossword this week Riley Girdlestone – working well at Maths, especially with problem solving Isobel and Tony Whyte – thanks for allowing the school green rubbish to be dumped on your property Val Thompson – thanks for cleaning our school in Megan Hardacre’s absence Congratulations and well done to you all.
    [Show full text]