IEA WIND 2014 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IEA WIND 2014 Annual Report IEA WIND 2014 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency August 2015 ISBN 978-0-9905075-1-2 Front cover photo: Tugliq Énergie Enercon 3-MW turbine at Raglan Mine, Quebec, Canada with aurora borealis (Credit: Justin Bulota) Message from the Chair By the end of 2014, more than 370 giga- watts of wind electricity were in operation worldwide, providing 5% of the world’s elec- tricity demand, and IEA Wind member coun- tries are world leaders in this wind deploy- ment. For example, Denmark gets 39.1% of its electricity from wind, China has deployed nearly 115 gigawatts of wind energy, the Unit- ed Kingdom increased offshore capacity 22% in 2014 and Germany reached half of its 2020 offshore target of 6.5 gigawatts. Over the past decade, great strides in wind energy technol- ogy development have enabled these impres- sive deployment numbers. R&D collaboration amongst the 21 countries of IEA wind has played a major role in addressing the most dif- ficult to solve wind technology challenges; and collaboration will continue to be important as future challenges are identified and addressed. The IEA Wind Annual Report documents the activities and accomplishments of the IEA Wind mem- ber countries in 2014. The report also shows the wide breadth of research being conducted world-wide, as reflected in the thirteen IEA Wind cooperative research tasks. In 2015, IEA Wind plans to add two new research tasks, to improve wind forecasting and to take a systems approach to wind turbine design. The IEA Wind agreement is strong and increasing in membership and activities. In 2014, the govern- ment of France became the newest member and Belgium and Israel plan to become members in 2015. IEA Wind welcomes and encourages the addition of new countries as members. With vast expertise in wind research and deployment, IEA Wind countries can help accelerate wind deployment in countries that are new to wind energy or can benefit from the experience of countries that are successfully oper- ating wind plants as part of their electrical systems. IEA Wind cooperative efforts advance wind energy’s role in the world's energy supply. Continued growth in wind energy deployment will depend on solving the critical technology and deployment challenges of the future. IEA Wind countries will play an important role in developing the solutions to these challenges. Jim Ahlgrimm Chair of the Executive Committee, 2013–2015 Contents Chapter 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 The Implementing Agreement ........................................................................................................................... 26 IEA Wind and Research Task Reports Chapter 3 Base Technology Information Exchange – Task 11 ............................................................................................ 32 Chapter 4 Wind Energy in Cold Climates – Task 19 ......................................................................................................... 36 Chapter 5 Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power – Task 25 .................................. 39 Chapter 6 Cost of Wind Energy – Task 26 ........................................................................................................................ 43 Chapter 7 Development and Deployment of Small Wind Turbine Labels for Consumers (2008–2011) and Small Wind Turbines in High Turbulence Sites (2012–2016) – Task 27 ....................................................... 46 Chapter 8 Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects – Task 28 ....................................................................................... 50 Chapter 9 Mexnext: Analysis of Wind Tunnel Measurements and Improvement of Aerodynamic Models – Task 29 .......... 52 Chapter 10 Offshore Code Comparison Collabaration Continued with Correlation (OC5) – Task 30................................ 57 Chapter 11 WAKEBENCH: Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models – Task 31 ............................................................ 60 Chapter 12 LIDAR: Lidar Systems for Wind Energy Deployment – Task 32 ....................................................................... 64 Chapter 13 Reliability Data: Standardizing Data Collection for Wind Turbine Reliability, Operation, and Maintenance Analyses – Task 33 ............................................................................................... 67 Chapter 14 Working Together to Resolve Environmental Effects of Wind Energy (WREN) – Task 34 ............................... 69 Chapter 15 Full-Size, Ground Testing for Wind Turbines and Their Components – Task 35................................................. 72 COUNTRY REPORTS Chapter 16 Austria .............................................................................................................................................................. 78 Chapter 17 Canada ............................................................................................................................................................. 82 Chapter 18 Chinese Wind Energy Association (CWEA) ..................................................................................................... 88 Chapter 19 Denmark .......................................................................................................................................................... 94 Chapter 20 The European Union/European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) ................................................................100 Chapter 21 Finland ............................................................................................................................................................108 Chapter 22 France ..............................................................................................................................................................114 Chapter 23 Germany .........................................................................................................................................................120 Chapter 24 Greece .............................................................................................................................................................126 Chapter 25 Ireland .............................................................................................................................................................128 Chapter 26 Italy .................................................................................................................................................................134 Chapter 27 Japan ................................................................................................................................................................140 Chapter 28 Republic of Korea ...........................................................................................................................................144 Chapter 29 México ............................................................................................................................................................148 Chapter 30 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................150 Chapter 31 Norway ...........................................................................................................................................................156 Chapter 32 Portugal ...........................................................................................................................................................160 Chapter 33 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................166 Chapter 34 Sweden ............................................................................................................................................................172 Chapter 35 Switzerland ......................................................................................................................................................176 Chapter 36 The United Kingdom ......................................................................................................................................180 Chapter 37 The United States ............................................................................................................................................186 APPENDICES Appendix A The Executive Committee (photo) ................................................................................................................192 Appendix B List of Executive Committee Members, Alternate Members, and Operating Agents .......................................193 Appendix C Currency Conversion Rates 2014 ..................................................................................................................196 Appendix D Abbreviations and Terminology ......................................................................................................................197 IEA Wind 3 1 Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction This IEA Wind 2014 Annual Report documents (IEA Wind 1995–2013), are Wind generation met close to 5% of the contains chapters from
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • SRI: Wind Power Generation Project Main Report
    Environment Impact Assessment (Draft) May 2017 SRI: Wind Power Generation Project Main Report Prepared by Ceylon Electricity Board, Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy, Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 17 May 2017) Currency unit – Sri Lankan rupee/s(SLRe/SLRs) SLRe 1.00 = $0.00655 $1.00 = SLRs 152.70 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CCD – Coast Conservation and Coastal Resource Management Department CEA – Central Environmental Authority CEB – Ceylon Electricity Board DoF – Department of Forest DS – District Secretary DSD – District Secretaries Division DWC – Department of Wildlife Conservation EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMoP – environmental monitoring plan EMP – environmental management plan EPC – engineering,procurement and construction GND – Grama Niladhari GoSL – Government of Sri Lanka GRM – grievance redress mechanism IA – implementing agency IEE – initial environmental examination LA – Local Authority LARC – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Committee MPRE – Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy MSL – mean sea level NARA – National Aquatic Resources Research & Development Agency NEA – National Environmental Act PIU – project implementation unit PRDA – Provincial Road Development Authority PUCSL – Public Utility Commission of Sri Lanka RDA – Road Development Authority RE – Rural Electrification RoW – right of way SLSEA – Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority WT – wind turbine WEIGHTS AND MEASURES GWh – 1 gigawatt hour = 1,000 Megawatt hour 1 ha – 1 hectare=10,000 square meters km – 1 kilometre = 1,000 meters kV – 1 kilovolt =1,000 volts MW – 1 megawatt = 1,000 Kilowatt NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • News Release No. 8/2011 from Vestas Northern Europe
    News release No. 8/2011 from Vestas Northern Europe Malmö, 19 October 2011 News release No. 8/2011 Page 1 of 2 Vestas continues expansion in Finland Vestas has received the second order from TuuliWatti Oy for delivery of 8 units of the V112-3.0 MW wind turbine for the Ii-Olhava project. The first order for 6 similar units was announced on 7 June 2011. The new order has a total capacity of 24 MW and the turbines will be installed in Olhava, Finland. Delivery of the turbines is scheduled to be completed by the end of 2012. The contract includes supply, installation and commissioning of the turbines and a 6-year full-scope active output management agreement. “We are very pleased that TuuliWatti Oy has shown confidence in the Vestas product and chooses Vestas as a partner for their wind power plant expansions. This second project in Finland is an important step for us to build a leading position in the Finnish market for renewable energy,” says Klaus Steen Mortensen, President of Vestas Northern Europe. Finland has recently taken steps to enhance the development of renewable energy. A feed-in tariff system for renewable energy was launched earlier this year, and Finland has a renewable energy target to produce 6 TWh from wind power by 2020. This requires a capacity of approx 2,500 MW. “TuuliWatti Oy has proven that they are a frontrunner in developing wind power in Finland and their partnership and trust means a lot to us. We look forward to a continued close cooperation on the coming project.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power in Finland up to the Year 2025
    ARTICLE IN PRESS Energy Policy 33 (2005) 1930–1947 Wind power in Finland up to the year 2025—‘soft’ scenarios based on expert views Vilja Varhoa,*, Petri Tapiob a Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, P.O. Box 27, University of Helsinki, Fin-00014 Helsinki, Finland b Finland Futures Research Centre, Korkeavuorenkatu 25 A 6, Fin-00130 Helsinki, Finland Abstract In this article we present a method of constructing ‘soft’ scenarios applied to the wind power development in Finland up to the year 2025. We asked 14 experts to describe probable and preferable futures using a quantitative questionnaire and qualitative interviews. Wind power production grows in all scenarios but there were differences in the order of magnitude of 10. The growth rate of electricity consumption slows down in all scenarios. Qualitative arguments varied even within clusters, with wind power policy emerging as the main dividing factor. The differences revealed diverse values and political objectives, as well as great uncertainties in assumptions about future developments. These influence wind power policy and were also believed to have contributed to the slow development of wind power in Finland. Re-thinking of the Finnish wind power policy is recommended. The ‘soft’ scenario method is considered valuable in finding diverse views, constructing transparent scenarios and assisting energy policy making. r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Keywords: Wind power; Scenario; Expert interview 1. Introduction This has inspired Finnish policy makers and Finnish industries that produce components and materials for Wind power made a remarkable entry to the energy the wind turbines. So far, the growth of domestic sector during the 1990s.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Renewables: Offshore
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES: OFFSHORE OFFSHORE AN ACTION AGENDA FOR DEPLOYMENT RENEWABLES An action agenda for deployment OFFSHORE RENEWABLES A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY An action agenda for deployment A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY www.irena.org 2021 © IRENA 2021 © IRENA 2021 Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of IRENA as the source and copyright holder. Material in this publication that is attributed to third parties may be subject to separate terms of use and restrictions, and appropriate permissions from these third parties may need to be secured before any use of such material. Citation: IRENA (2021), Offshore renewables: An action agenda for deployment, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-349-6 About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) serves as the principal platform for international co-operation, a centre of excellence, a repository of policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge, and a driver of action on the ground to advance the transformation of the global energy system. An intergovernmental organisation established in 2011, IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org Acknowledgements IRENA is grateful for the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (Directorate-General for Global Affairs, DGMO) contribution that enabled the preparation of this report in the context of the Italian G20 Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report
    IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency July 2013 ISBN 0-9786383-7-9 Message from the Chair Welcome to the IEA In 2013, we expect to approve Recommended Wind 2012 Annual Re- Practices on social acceptance of wind energy proj- port of the coopera- ects, on remote wind speed sensing using SODAR tive research, develop- and LIDAR, and on conducting wind integration ment, and deployment studies. The 12 active research tasks of IEA wind will (R,D&D) efforts of our offer members many options to multiply their na- member governments and tional research programs, and a new task on ground- organizations. IEA Wind based testing of wind turbines and components is helps advance wind en- being discussed for approval in 2013. ergy in countries repre- With market challenges and ever-changing re- senting 85% of the world's search issues to address, the IEA Wind co-operation wind generating capacity. works to make wind energy an ever better green In 2012 record ca- option for the world's energy supply. Considering pacity additions (MW) these accomplishments and the plans for the coming were seen in nine member countries, and coop- years, it is with great satisfaction and confidence that erative research produced five final technical re- I hand the Chair position to Jim Ahlgrimm of the ports as well as many journal articles and confer- United States. ence papers. The technical reports include: • IEA
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit 11R Drawings and Specifications of Gamesa Eolica
    Exhibit 11R Drawings and Specifications of Gamesa Eolica Wind Turbines The Applicant plans to use Gamesa G90 Wind Turbines at the Marble River Wind Farm (see enclosure #1, press announcement of purchase of Gamesa turbines). Gamesa is a leading company in the design, manufacturing, installation, operation and maintenance of wind turbines. In 2004, Gamesa was ranked second worldwide in a ranking of the Top 10 wind turbine manufacturers by BTM Consult, with a market share of 18.1%. In Spain, Gamesa Eólica is the leading manufacturer and supplier of wind turbines, with a market share of 56.8% in 2004. One of the partners in the Marble River Wind Farm, Acciona, has had a significant and successful history with Gamesa turbines. Gamesa has used the experience gained in its home market to develop a robust, adaptable wind turbine suitable for most wind conditions in the USA. Gamesa Wind US will carry out a major portion of the manufacturing of the wind turbines planned for Marble River in the Mid-Atlantic region, where Gamesa is already active in development and construction of wind energy projects. Gamesa G90 The Gamesa G90 is a 2-MW, three-bladed, upwind pitch regulated and active yaw wind turbine. The G90 has a blade length of 44m which, when added to the diameter of the hub, gives a total diameter of 90m and a swept area of 6362m2. The turbine blades are bolted to a hub at the low speed end of a 1:120 ratio gear box. Enclosure #2, G90-2.0MW, contains a picture of the G90 with a summary of the technical data.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy
    Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy March 2020 Udo Zillmann Kristian Petrick Stefanie Thoms www.airbornewindeurope.org 1 § Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy Agenda § Airborne Wind Energy – principle and concepts § Advantages § Challenges § Airborne Wind Europe § Meeting with DG RTD www.airbornewindeurope.org 2 § AWE principle and concepts Overview § Principles § Ground generation § On-board generation § Different types § Soft wing § Rigid wing § Semi-rigid wing § Other forms www.airbornewindeurope.org 3 § AWE principle Ground generation (“ground gen”) or yo-yo principle Kite flies out in a spiral and creates a tractive pull force to the tether, the winch generates electricity as it is being reeled out. Kite Tether Winch Tether is retracted back as kite flies directly back to the starting point. Return phase consumes a few % of Generator power generated, requires < 10 % of total cycle time. www.airbornewindeurope.org 4 § AWE principle On-board generation (“fly-gen”) Kite flies constantly cross-wind, power is produced in the on-board generators and evacuated through the tether www.airbornewindeurope.org 5 § AWE principle The general idea: Emulating the movement of a blade tip but at higher altitudes Source: Erc Highwind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UmN3MiR65E Makani www.airbornewindeurope.org 6 § AWE principle Fundamental idea of AWE systems • With a conventional wind turbine, the outer 20 % of the blades (the fastest moving part) generates about 60% of the power • AWE is the logical step to use only a fast flying device that emulates the blade tip. www.airbornewindeurope.org 7 § AWE concepts Concepts of our members – soft, semi-rigid and rigid wings www.airbornewindeurope.org 8 § AWE Concept Overview of technological concepts Aerostatic concepts are not in scope of this presentation Source: Ecorys 2018 www.airbornewindeurope.org 9 § AWE Concept Rigid kite with Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme
    IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme 2017 Annual Report A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Wind energy continued its strong forward momentum during the past term, with many countries setting records in cost reduction, deployment, and grid integration. In 2017, new records were set for hourly, daily, and annual wind–generated electricity, as well as share of energy from wind. For example, Portugal covered 110% of national consumption with wind-generated electricity during three hours while China’s wind energy production increased 26% to 305.7 TWh. In Denmark, wind achieved a 43% share of the energy mix—the largest share of any IEA Wind TCP member countries. From 2010-2017, land-based wind energy auction prices dropped an average of 25%, and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) fell by 21%. In fact, the average, globally-weighted LCOE for land-based wind was 60 USD/ MWh in 2017, second only to hydropower among renewable generation sources. As a result, new countries are adopting wind energy. Offshore wind energy costs have also significantly decreased during the last few years. In Germany and the Netherlands, offshore bids were awarded at a zero premium, while a Contract for Differences auction round in the United Kingdom included two offshore wind farms with record strike prices as low as 76 USD/MWh. On top of the previous achievements, repowering and life extension of wind farms are creating new opportunities in mature markets. However, other challenges still need to be addressed. Wind energy continues to suffer from long permitting procedures, which may hinder deployment in many countries. The rate of wind energy deployment is also uncertain after 2020 due to lack of policies; for example, only eight out of the 28 EU member states have wind power policies in place beyond 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development
    U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Document Number DE-EE0005364 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Cash Fitzpatrick Gary Norton Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Bruce Hamilton, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Lisa Frantzis Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium member organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Keyser and Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005364. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report. NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. Readers of the report are advised that they assume all liabilities incurred by them, or third parties, as a result of their reliance on the report, or the data, information, findings and opinions contained in the report.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power Technology Knowledge Sharing, Provided by SKF 28
    EVOLUTION A SELECTION OF ARTICLES PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED IN EVOLUTION, A BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY MAGAZINE FROM SKF WIND POWER TECHNOLOGY KNOWLEDGE SHARING, PROVIDED BY SKF 28 30 ContentsA selection of articles previously published in Evolution, a business and technology magazine issued by SKF. 03 Robust measures Premature bearing failures in wind gearboxes 32 14 and white etching cracks. 14 Dark forces How black oxide-coated bearings can make an impact on cutting O&M costs for wind turbines. 20 A flexibile choice SKF’s high-capacity cylindrical roller bearings are specifically designed for wind turbine gearbox applications. 23 Marble arts Developments in ceramic bearing balls for high- performance applications. 28 Wind powering the US The United States is increasingly looking to the skies to find new energy. 30 Spin doctors Engineering company Sincro Mecánica helps to make sure ageing turbines stay productive at Spain’s leading wind farms. 32 Improved efficiency A successfull cooperation of companies within the SKF Group has led to the development of an improved pump unit for centralized lubrication 20 systems. 2 evolution.skf.com 3 PHOTO: ISTOCKPHOTO Premature bearing failures in wind gearboxes and white etching cracks (WEC) Wind turbine gearboxes are subjected to a wide variety of operating conditions, some of which may push the bearings beyond their limits. Damage may be done to the bearings, resulting in a specific premature failure mode known as white etching cracks (WEC), sometimes called brittle, short-life, early, abnormal or white structured flaking (WSF). Measures to make the bearings more robust in these operating conditions are discussed in this article.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for the Commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems
    first save date Wednesday, November 14, 2018 - total pages 53 Reaction Paper to the Recent Ecorys Study KI0118188ENN.en.pdf1 Challenges for the commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems Draft V0.2.2 of Massimo Ippolito released the 30/1/2019 Comments to [email protected] Table of contents Table of contents Abstract Executive Summary Differences Between AWES and KiteGen Evidence 1: Tether Drag - a Non-Issue Evidence 2: KiteGen Carousel Carousel Addendum Hypothesis for Explanation: Evidence 3: TPL vs TRL Matrix - KiteGen Stem TPL Glass-Ceiling/Threshold/Barrier and Scalability Issues Evidence 4: Tethered Airfoils and the Power Wing Tethered Airfoil in General KiteGen’s Giant Power Wing Inflatable Kites Flat Rigid Wing Drones and Propellers Evidence 5: Best Concept System Architecture KiteGen Carousel 1 Ecorys AWE report available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a874f843-c137-11e8-9893-01aa75ed 71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-76863616 or ​ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329044800_Study_on_challenges_in_the_commercialisatio n_of_airborne_wind_energy_systems 1 FlyGen and GroundGen KiteGen remarks about the AWEC conference Illogical Accusation in the Report towards the developers. The dilemma: Demonstrate or be Committed to Design and Improve the Specifications Continuous Operation as a Requirement Other Methodological Errors of the Ecorys Report Auto-Breeding Concept Missing EroEI Energy Quality Concept Missing Why KiteGen Claims to be the Last Energy Reservoir Left to Humankind
    [Show full text]