IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency July 2013 ISBN 0-9786383-7-9 Message from the Chair Welcome to the IEA In 2013, we expect to approve Recommended Wind 2012 Annual Re- Practices on social acceptance of wind energy proj- port of the coopera- ects, on remote wind speed sensing using SODAR tive research, develop- and LIDAR, and on conducting wind integration ment, and deployment studies. The 12 active research tasks of IEA wind will (R,D&D) efforts of our offer members many options to multiply their na- member governments and tional research programs, and a new task on ground- organizations. IEA Wind based testing of wind turbines and components is helps advance wind en- being discussed for approval in 2013. ergy in countries repre- With market challenges and ever-changing re- senting 85% of the world's search issues to address, the IEA Wind co-operation wind generating capacity. works to make wind energy an ever better green In 2012 record ca- option for the world's energy supply. Considering pacity additions (MW) these accomplishments and the plans for the coming were seen in nine member countries, and coop- years, it is with great satisfaction and confidence that erative research produced five final technical re- I hand the Chair position to Jim Ahlgrimm of the ports as well as many journal articles and confer- United States. ence papers. The technical reports include: • IEA Wind Task 19 State-of-the Art Report off Wind Energy in Cold Climates • Design and operation of power systems with largee amounts of wind power: Final summary report, IEA Wind Task 25, Phase two 2009–2011 • The Past and Future Cost of Wind Energy, IEA Wind Task 26 Work Package 2 Report, HHannele l HHolttinen ltti • Final Report IEA Wind Task 28 on Social Accep- Chair of the Executive Committee, 2011 to 2012 tance of Wind Energy Projects 2008–2011 • Final report of IEA Wind Task 29, Mexnext (Phase 1): Analysis of MEXICO wind tunnel measurements. In 2012, we approved another IEA Wind Recommended Practice, RP 13 Wind Energy Proj- ects in Cold Climates, which contributed to reduc- ing the risks of projects in cold climates, where the wind resource is so abundant. We held Topi- cal Experts Meetings on advances in wind turbine and component testing, social acceptance of wind energy projects, and wind farm control methods. Moving forward, we approved a new research task to share results on environmental assessment and monitoring techniques for wind developments on land and offshore. Jim Ahlgrimm Chair-Elect of the Executive Committee Contents Chapter 1 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................... 4 Chapter 2 The Implementing Agreement ........................................................................................................................... 18 IEA Wind and Research Task Reports Chapter 3 Base Technology Information Exchange – Task 11 ............................................................................................23 Chapter 4 Wind Energy in Cold Climates – Task 19 ......................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 5 Design and Operation of Power Systems with Large Amounts of Wind Power – Task 25 ..................................28 Chapter 6 Cost of Wind Energy – Task 26 ........................................................................................................................ 32 Chapter 7 Development and Deployment of Small Wind Turbine Labels for Consumers (2008–2011) and Small Wind Turbines in High Turbulence Sites (2012–2016) – Task 27 .......................................................35 Chapter 8 Social Acceptance of Wind Energy Projects – Task 28 ....................................................................................... 38 Chapter 9 Mexnext: Analysis of Wind Tunnel Measurements and Improvement of Aerodynamic Models – Task 29 .......... 41 Chapter 10 Offshore Code Comparison Collabaration (OC4) Project – Task 30 .................................................................45 Chapter 11 WAKEBENCH: Benchmarking of Wind Farm Flow Models – Task 31 ............................................................ 48 Chapter 12 LIDAR: Lidar Systems for Wind Energy Deployment – Task 32 ....................................................................... 51 Chapter 13 Reliability Data: Standardizing Data Collection for Wind Turbine Reliability, Operation, and Maintenance Analyses – Task 33 ............................................................................................... 54 Chapter 14 Assessing Environmental Effects and Monitoring Efforts for Offshore and Land-Based Wind Energy System – Task 34 ...................................................................................................... 57 COUNTRY REPORTS Chapter 15 Australia ............................................................................................................................................................ 60 Chapter 16 Austria .............................................................................................................................................................. 64 Chapter 17 Canada ............................................................................................................................................................. 68 Chapter 18 Chinese Wind Energy Association (CWEA) ..................................................................................................... 74 Chapter 19 Denmark .......................................................................................................................................................... 78 Chapter 20 The European Union/European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) .................................................................84 Chapter 21 Finland ............................................................................................................................................................. 90 Chapter 22 Germany .......................................................................................................................................................... 96 Chapter 23 Greece .............................................................................................................................................................102 Chapter 24 Ireland .............................................................................................................................................................104 Chapter 25 Italy .................................................................................................................................................................108 Chapter 26 Japan ................................................................................................................................................................114 Chapter 27 Republic of Korea ...........................................................................................................................................118 Chapter 28 Mexico ............................................................................................................................................................122 Chapter 29 The Netherlands ..............................................................................................................................................126 Chapter 30 Norway ...........................................................................................................................................................132 Chapter 31 Portugal ...........................................................................................................................................................136 Chapter 32 Spain ...............................................................................................................................................................140 Chapter 33 Sweden ............................................................................................................................................................146 Chapter 34 Switzerland ......................................................................................................................................................150 Chapter 35 The United Kingdom ......................................................................................................................................154 Chapter 36 The United States ............................................................................................................................................160 APPENDICES Appendix A The Executive Committee (photo) ................................................................................................................166 Appendix B List of Executive Committee Members, Alternate Members, and Operating Agents .......................................167 Appendix C Currency Conversion Rates 2012 ..................................................................................................................170 Appendix D Abbreviations and Terminology ......................................................................................................................171 IEA Wind 3 1 Executive Summary Source: PWT Communications
Recommended publications
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Renewables: Offshore
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES: OFFSHORE OFFSHORE AN ACTION AGENDA FOR DEPLOYMENT RENEWABLES An action agenda for deployment OFFSHORE RENEWABLES A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY An action agenda for deployment A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY www.irena.org 2021 © IRENA 2021 © IRENA 2021 Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of IRENA as the source and copyright holder. Material in this publication that is attributed to third parties may be subject to separate terms of use and restrictions, and appropriate permissions from these third parties may need to be secured before any use of such material. Citation: IRENA (2021), Offshore renewables: An action agenda for deployment, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-349-6 About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) serves as the principal platform for international co-operation, a centre of excellence, a repository of policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge, and a driver of action on the ground to advance the transformation of the global energy system. An intergovernmental organisation established in 2011, IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org Acknowledgements IRENA is grateful for the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (Directorate-General for Global Affairs, DGMO) contribution that enabled the preparation of this report in the context of the Italian G20 Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy
    Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy March 2020 Udo Zillmann Kristian Petrick Stefanie Thoms www.airbornewindeurope.org 1 § Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy Agenda § Airborne Wind Energy – principle and concepts § Advantages § Challenges § Airborne Wind Europe § Meeting with DG RTD www.airbornewindeurope.org 2 § AWE principle and concepts Overview § Principles § Ground generation § On-board generation § Different types § Soft wing § Rigid wing § Semi-rigid wing § Other forms www.airbornewindeurope.org 3 § AWE principle Ground generation (“ground gen”) or yo-yo principle Kite flies out in a spiral and creates a tractive pull force to the tether, the winch generates electricity as it is being reeled out. Kite Tether Winch Tether is retracted back as kite flies directly back to the starting point. Return phase consumes a few % of Generator power generated, requires < 10 % of total cycle time. www.airbornewindeurope.org 4 § AWE principle On-board generation (“fly-gen”) Kite flies constantly cross-wind, power is produced in the on-board generators and evacuated through the tether www.airbornewindeurope.org 5 § AWE principle The general idea: Emulating the movement of a blade tip but at higher altitudes Source: Erc Highwind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UmN3MiR65E Makani www.airbornewindeurope.org 6 § AWE principle Fundamental idea of AWE systems • With a conventional wind turbine, the outer 20 % of the blades (the fastest moving part) generates about 60% of the power • AWE is the logical step to use only a fast flying device that emulates the blade tip. www.airbornewindeurope.org 7 § AWE concepts Concepts of our members – soft, semi-rigid and rigid wings www.airbornewindeurope.org 8 § AWE Concept Overview of technological concepts Aerostatic concepts are not in scope of this presentation Source: Ecorys 2018 www.airbornewindeurope.org 9 § AWE Concept Rigid kite with Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme
    IEA Wind Technology Collaboration Programme 2017 Annual Report A MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Wind energy continued its strong forward momentum during the past term, with many countries setting records in cost reduction, deployment, and grid integration. In 2017, new records were set for hourly, daily, and annual wind–generated electricity, as well as share of energy from wind. For example, Portugal covered 110% of national consumption with wind-generated electricity during three hours while China’s wind energy production increased 26% to 305.7 TWh. In Denmark, wind achieved a 43% share of the energy mix—the largest share of any IEA Wind TCP member countries. From 2010-2017, land-based wind energy auction prices dropped an average of 25%, and levelized cost of energy (LCOE) fell by 21%. In fact, the average, globally-weighted LCOE for land-based wind was 60 USD/ MWh in 2017, second only to hydropower among renewable generation sources. As a result, new countries are adopting wind energy. Offshore wind energy costs have also significantly decreased during the last few years. In Germany and the Netherlands, offshore bids were awarded at a zero premium, while a Contract for Differences auction round in the United Kingdom included two offshore wind farms with record strike prices as low as 76 USD/MWh. On top of the previous achievements, repowering and life extension of wind farms are creating new opportunities in mature markets. However, other challenges still need to be addressed. Wind energy continues to suffer from long permitting procedures, which may hinder deployment in many countries. The rate of wind energy deployment is also uncertain after 2020 due to lack of policies; for example, only eight out of the 28 EU member states have wind power policies in place beyond 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Challenges for the Commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems
    first save date Wednesday, November 14, 2018 - total pages 53 Reaction Paper to the Recent Ecorys Study KI0118188ENN.en.pdf1 Challenges for the commercialization of Airborne Wind Energy Systems Draft V0.2.2 of Massimo Ippolito released the 30/1/2019 Comments to [email protected] Table of contents Table of contents Abstract Executive Summary Differences Between AWES and KiteGen Evidence 1: Tether Drag - a Non-Issue Evidence 2: KiteGen Carousel Carousel Addendum Hypothesis for Explanation: Evidence 3: TPL vs TRL Matrix - KiteGen Stem TPL Glass-Ceiling/Threshold/Barrier and Scalability Issues Evidence 4: Tethered Airfoils and the Power Wing Tethered Airfoil in General KiteGen’s Giant Power Wing Inflatable Kites Flat Rigid Wing Drones and Propellers Evidence 5: Best Concept System Architecture KiteGen Carousel 1 Ecorys AWE report available at: https://publications.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a874f843-c137-11e8-9893-01aa75ed 71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-76863616 or ​ https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329044800_Study_on_challenges_in_the_commercialisatio n_of_airborne_wind_energy_systems 1 FlyGen and GroundGen KiteGen remarks about the AWEC conference Illogical Accusation in the Report towards the developers. The dilemma: Demonstrate or be Committed to Design and Improve the Specifications Continuous Operation as a Requirement Other Methodological Errors of the Ecorys Report Auto-Breeding Concept Missing EroEI Energy Quality Concept Missing Why KiteGen Claims to be the Last Energy Reservoir Left to Humankind
    [Show full text]
  • Airborne Wind Energy
    Airborne Wind Energy Technology Review and Feasibility in Germany Seminar Paper for Sustainable Energy Systems Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Technical University of Munich Supervisors Johne, Philipp Hetterich, Barbara Chair of Energy Systems Authors Drexler, Christoph Hofmann, Alexander Kiss, Balínt Handed in Munich, 05. July 2017 Abstract As a new generation of wind energy systems, AWESs (Airborne Wind Energy Systems) have the potential to grow competitive to their conventional ancestors within the upcoming decade. An overview of the state of the art of AWESs has been presented. For the feasibility ana- lysis of AWESs in Germany, a detailed wind analysis of a three dimensional grid of 80 data points above Germany has been conducted. Long-term NWM (Numerical Weather Model) data over 38 years provided by the NCEP (National Centers for Environmental Prediction) has been analysed to determine the wind probability distributions at elevated altitudes. Besides other data, these distributions and available performance curves have been used to calcu- late the evaluation criteria AEEY (Annual Electrical Energy Yield) and CF (Capacity Factor). Together with the additional criteria LCOE (Levelised Costs of Electricity), MP (Material Per- formance), and REP (Rated Electrical Power) a quantitative cost utility analysis according to Zangemeister has been conducted. This analysis has shown that AWESs look promising and could become an attractive alternative to traditional wind energy systems. 2 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Global Wind Turbine Technology Trends
    Analyst PRESENTATION Global Wind Turbine Technology Trends 26 April 2017 Andy Li [email protected] Introduction A few words about MAKE Summary ▪ MAKE is one of the global wind industry's premier strategic consulting and research firms, serving the world’s leading wind companies from all parts of the value chain from raw material suppliers to IPPs and utilities. ▪ MAKE is based in Aarhus (DK) and has offices in Hamburg (D), Chicago, Boston (U.S.) & Shanghai (China). Andy Li Business Analyst ▪ Publish industry leading wind energy research reports, analysis and databases ▪ Leads the execution of MAKE’s China advisory projects ▪ Consult on wind farm investments, market ▪ Solid background in the Chinese wind industry including assessment, supply chain dynamics, technology, product development at Envision Energy operations & maintenance, M&A advisory, ▪ Extensive knowledge of wind turbine, wind farm business & market modelling and offshore wind solutions, and big data platform development ▪ B.Eng – Mechanical Engineering ▪ Due-diligence partner for European and international PE and industrial investors ▪ M.Eng – Industrial and Financial Engineering Japan offshore wind market overview March 2017 2 Introduction A sample of our industrial clients Japan offshore wind market overview 3 March 2017 Introduction A sample of our financial clients Japan offshore wind market overview 4 March 2017 Contents ▪ Executive summary ▪ Global wind turbine technology trends ▪ Sources of innovation and ‘breakthrough’ technology 5 Delivering renewable Executive summary
    [Show full text]
  • Statistical Characteristics and Mapping of Near-Surface and Elevated Wind Resources in the Middle East
    Statistical characteristics and mapping of near-surface and elevated wind resources in the Middle East Dissertation by Chak Man Andrew Yip In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy King Abdullah University of Science and Technology Thuwal, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia November, 2018 2 EXAMINATION COMMITTEE PAGE The dissertation of Chak Man Andrew Yip is approved by the examination committee Committee Chairperson: Georgiy L. Stenchikov Committee Members: Marc G. Genton, Gerard T. Schuster, Kristopher B. Kar- nauskas 3 ©November, 2018 Chak Man Andrew Yip All Rights Reserved 4 ABSTRACT Statistical characteristics and mapping of near-surface and elevated wind resources in the Middle East Chak Man Andrew Yip Wind energy is expected to contribute to alleviating the rise in energy demand in the Middle East that is driven by population growth and industrial development. However, variability and intermittency in the wind resource present significant chal- lenges to grid integration of wind energy systems. The first chapter addresses the issues in current wind resource assessment in the Middle East due to sparse meteorological observations with varying record lengths. The wind field with consistent space-time resolution for over three decades at three hub heights over the whole Arabian Peninsula is constructed using the Modern Era Retrospective-Analysis for Research and Applications (MERRA) dataset. The wind resource is assessed at a higher spatial resolution with metrics of temporal variations in the wind than in prior studies. Previously unrecognized locations of interest with high wind abundance and low variability and intermittency have been identified in this study and confirmed by recent on-site observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiwigen” Project
    TREN-2 “KiWiGen”_Project PRIORITY 6.1 “Sustainable Energy Systems” Call FP6-2003 -TREN-2 SPECIFIC TARGETED RESEARCH PROJECTS (STREP) Project Acronym: “KiWiGen” Project full title: “Kite Wind Generator, smart control of power kites for renewable energy production” Date of preparation: 16-Dec-03 List of participants: Sequoia automation Srl IT (Co-ordinator) Fidia S.p.A. IT Ce.S.I. IT FATRONIK ES Institute of Electric Technology ES Delft University of Technology NL Utrecht University NL Co-ordinating person: Massimo Ippolito Co-ordinator organisation: Sequoia Automation E-mail: [email protected] Tel: +39 011 9415745 Fax: +39 011 9402168 Part_B Page_1_of_55 Date:16-Dec-03 TREN-2 “KiWiGen”_Project Contents Contents...............................................................................................................2 Proposal summary ...............................................................................................4 Proposal abstract.................................................................................................4 B1 Scientific and technological objectives of the project and state of the art.......5 Project S&T Objectives .........................................................................................................5 The Demonstrator Prototype .................................................................................................................... 5 The first phase – human control ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • KITE GEN STEM MASSIMO IPPOLITO Via 25 APRILE N°8 CAP 10023 Città CHIERI Prov.TO [email protected] KITE GEN R
    KITE GEN STEM MASSIMO IPPOLITO KITE GEN RESEARCH SRL Via 25 APRILE n°8 CAP 10023 Città CHIERI Prov.TO 011 941 57 45 [email protected] www.kitegen.com SEQUOIA AUTOMATION SRL Via 25 APRILE n°8 CAP 10023 Città CHIERI Prov.TO 011 941 57 45 [email protected] www.sequoiaonline.com MARCELLO CORONGIU SEQUOIA AUTOMATION 011 941 57 45 [email protected] MARCELLO CORONGIU SEQUOIA AUTOMATION 011 941 57 45 [email protected] KiteGen STEM is an on ground energy generator that transform high altitude wind power into electricity. KiteGen® Stem is a fully automatic, light, cost-effective, technologically advanced high altitude generator that aims at adding a new perspective to the ways humanity produces the energy necessary to sustain itself. The KiteGen® Stem is a new renewable energy technology, which also introduces a new renewable energy field. After having tested a small (40 kW) prototype in 2006, the pre-industrial 3MW prototype is currently under completion and first flight and generation tests are expected in a few months. Usually when we think about renewable energies we think mainly about solar PV technologies, traditional wind farms or hydroelectric plants. From tomorrow we will include energy production technologies based on an, up to now, unexploited resource: the altitude winds. The issues related with energy , the direct link between energy and our life-style, the changes that energy has brought to our lives in the last 100 years and the perspectives for the next 100, the challenges of sustainability etc.. are all fundamental aspects of the same subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Supply Value Only in the Queue of the Wind Speed Distribution, (I.E
    FEATURES THE LARGEST RENEWABLE, EASILY EXPLOITABLE, AND ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABLE ENERGY RESOURCE 1 2 l Giancarlo Abbate and Eugenio Saraceno – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epn/2018101 l 1 Universita` di Napoli “Federico II” – Naples, Italy – [email protected] — 2 KiteGen Venture S.p.a. – Caselle (Turin), Italy Sun, the ultimate energy resource of our planet, transfers energy to the Earth at an average power of 23,000 TW. Earth surface can be regarded as a huge panel transforming solar energy into a more convenient mechanical form, the wind. Since millennia wind is recognized as an exploitable form of energy and it is common knowledge that the higher you go, the stronger the winds flow. To go high is difficult; however Bill Gates cites high wind among possible energy miracles in the near future. Public awareness of this possible miracle is still missing, but today's technology is ready for it. 16 EPN 49/1 sustainable ENERGY RESOURCE FEATURES ropospheric Wind Energy or High Altitude Wind Energy (HAWE), also known as high- wind energy, is a vast and well-known kinetic Tenergy resource. The atmospheric stationary regime is powered by a percentage of the total mean solar radiation (230 W/m2 after reflection to space) around 2%. Gustavson in 1979 [1] estimated the power needed to maintain the stationary regime of the atmosphere as huge as 3,600 TW. Of the 3,600 TW figure, the near-surface wind resources available to wind turbines are in the range 25-70 TW, see figure 1. Near-surface wind and solar technologies also deal with low capacity factors.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA WIND 2014 Annual Report
    IEA WIND 2014 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency August 2015 ISBN 978-0-9905075-1-2 Front cover photo: Tugliq Énergie Enercon 3-MW turbine at Raglan Mine, Quebec, Canada with aurora borealis (Credit: Justin Bulota) Message from the Chair By the end of 2014, more than 370 giga- watts of wind electricity were in operation worldwide, providing 5% of the world’s elec- tricity demand, and IEA Wind member coun- tries are world leaders in this wind deploy- ment. For example, Denmark gets 39.1% of its electricity from wind, China has deployed nearly 115 gigawatts of wind energy, the Unit- ed Kingdom increased offshore capacity 22% in 2014 and Germany reached half of its 2020 offshore target of 6.5 gigawatts. Over the past decade, great strides in wind energy technol- ogy development have enabled these impres- sive deployment numbers. R&D collaboration amongst the 21 countries of IEA wind has played a major role in addressing the most dif- ficult to solve wind technology challenges; and collaboration will continue to be important as future challenges are identified and addressed. The IEA Wind Annual Report documents the activities and accomplishments of the IEA Wind mem- ber countries in 2014. The report also shows the wide breadth of research being conducted world-wide, as reflected in the thirteen IEA Wind cooperative research tasks. In 2015, IEA Wind plans to add two new research tasks, to improve wind forecasting and to take a systems approach to wind turbine design.
    [Show full text]