DOCSLIB.ORG

U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Navigant Consulting, Inc. 77 Bedford Street Suite 400 Burlington, MA 01803-5154 781.270.8314 www.navigant.com February 22, 2013 U.S. Offshore Wind Manufacturing and Supply Chain Development Document Number DE-EE0005364 Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy Michael Hahn Cash Fitzpatrick Gary Norton Prepared by: Navigant Consulting, Inc. Bruce Hamilton, Principal Investigator Lindsay Battenberg Mark Bielecki Charlie Bloch Terese Decker Lisa Frantzis Aris Karcanias Birger Madsen Jay Paidipati Andy Wickless Feng Zhao Navigant Consortium member organizations Key Contributors American Wind Energy Association Jeff Anthony and Chris Long Great Lakes Wind Collaborative John Hummer and Victoria Pebbles Green Giraffe Energy Bankers Marie DeGraaf, Jérôme Guillet, and Niels Jongste National Renewable Energy Laboratory David Keyser and Eric Lantz Ocean & Coastal Consultants (a COWI company) Brent D. Cooper, P.E., Joe Marrone, P.E., and Stanley M. White, P.E., D.PE, D.CE Tetra Tech EC, Inc. Michael D. Ernst, Esq. Notice and Disclaimer This report was prepared by Navigant Consulting, Inc. for the use of the U.S. Department of Energy – who supported this effort under Award Number DE-EE0005364. The work presented in this report represents our best efforts and judgments based on the information available at the time this report was prepared. Navigant Consulting, Inc. is not responsible for the reader’s use of, or reliance upon, the report, nor any decisions based on the report. NAVIGANT CONSULTING, INC. MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS OR WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED. Readers of the report are advised that they assume all liabilities incurred by them, or third parties, as a result of their reliance on the report, or the data, information, findings and opinions contained in the report. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States government or any agency thereof. This report is being disseminated by the Department of Energy. As such, the document was prepared in compliance with Section 515 of the Treasury and General Government Appropriations Act for Fiscal Year 2001 (Public Law 106-554) and information quality guidelines issued by the Department of Energy. Though this report does not constitute “influential” information, as that term is defined in DOE’s information quality guidelines or the Office of Management and Budget's Information Quality Bulletin for Peer Review (Bulletin), the study was reviewed both internally and externally prior to publication. For purposes of external review, the study benefited from the advice and comments of a panel of offshore wind industry stakeholders. That panel included representatives from private corporations, national laboratories, and universities. Acknowledgments For their support of this report, the authors thank the entire U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Wind & Water Power Program team, and in particular Cash Fitzpatrick and Gary Norton. For reviewing elements of this report or providing key input, we also acknowledge: Walt Musial, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); and Robin Newmark, NREL. Navigant would also like to thank the following for their contributions to this report: Matt Aldeman, Illinois State University; Tim Axelsson, Fishermen’s Energy; Rick Bergman, Aquilo Wind Development; Jessica Bowling, Baltimore Helicopter Services; David Bradley, Lake Effect Energy; Randy Brown, Metal Trades, Inc.; Kyoo Sung Byun, LS Cable America, Inc.; Guy Chapman, Dominion; Fara Courtney, U.S. Offshore Wind Collaborative; Michael Crist, Moffatt & Nichol; Alexander DePillis, Wind Energy Systems Engineering, Inc.; Timothy D. Downey, Saint Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation; Heinrich Duden, ep4 offshore GmbH; Dennis Duffy, Energy Management Inc.; Juan Lopez-Doriga Escalante, Rockford Berge; Fort Felker, NREL; Patrick Fullenkamp, Global Wind Network; Alice Fuchs, Mishilsolarplus; Russ Germick, Vestas Americas; Ryan Greenfield, Schaeffler Group; Parveen Gupta, Bosch Rexroth; Kim Gyr, Green Millennium; Christopher Hardy, U.S. Offshore Wind Collaborative; Christopher Haugen, ITW WindGroup; John F. Hill, GE Energy Converteam; Matthias Hofmann, SINTEF; William L. Hurley, Jr., The Glosten Associates, Inc.; Mike Ireland, Larkin Enterprises, Inc.; Philip Jacobs, Alstom Grid Solutions USA; Andrew Jacus, Dillinger Hütte GTS; David L. Jansen P.E., Janseneering, Inc.; George Kendrick, Stantec Consulting; Paul J. Kerman MS; Bradley Kerr, Detyen’s Shipyards, Inc.; Steven Kopits, Douglas-Westwood; Kerman Consulting Services; Kenneth L Kraemer, University of California, Irvine; Doug Lindsey, Lakeshore Technical College; Hao Ling, The University of Texas at Austin; Simon Mahan, Southern Alliance for Clean Energy; Todd Main, Illinois Department of Natural Resources; Christian Mertens, Bosch Rexroth; Lawrence H. Mott, SgurrEnergy Inc.; Gary Murphy, Case Western Reserve University; Natalia Nagree, Douglas-Westwood; Dennis L. Nielson, DOSECC Exploration Services, LLC; John Nikoloff, PA Energy Resources Group, LLC; Brian O'Hara, North Carolina Offshore Wind Coalition; Kris Ohleth, Atlantic Wind Connection; Rick Palmer, Weeks Marine, Inc.; Katherine Peretick, Vestas; Raoul Raffagli, Siemens Wind Power A/S; Bonnie Ram, Ram Power LLC; Jay Robison, Arkansas Economic Development Commission; Tim Ryan, Apex Offshore Wind, LLC; Stephane Sanchez, Consulate-General Kingdom of the Netherlands; Hans-Christian Schimmelmann, ABB; Philipp Schmid, SKF; Bob Schubert, Siemens; Stephan Schwab, Siemens Energy, Inc.; Geoff Sharples, CPE; Steve Sheik, Baltimore Helicopter Services; Robert Sherwin, EAPC Wind Energy; Benjamin B. Smith, Stevens Towing, Inc.; Larry Shirley, NC Department of Commerce; Duncan Sokolowski, Global Marine Energy, Inc.; Larry Viterna, Nautica Windpower LLC; Andreas Wagner , German Offshore Wind Energy Foundation; Lorry Wagner, LeedCo; Carl F. Wegener, Signal International, Inc.; Dale Williamson, Alstom Power; Chris Wissemann, Freshwater Wind; Thomas Zirngibl, TUV SUD America Inc. Table of Contents Abbreviations .......................................................................................................................................................... vii Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................ viii Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................. x Chapter 1. Offshore Wind Plant Costs and Anticipated Technology Advancements ........................ xi Chapter 2. Potential Supply Chain Requirements and Opportunities ................................................ xiii Chapter 3. Strategy for Future Development ......................................................................................... xvii Chapter 4. Analysis of Market Entry Pathways ...................................................................................... xx 1. Offshore Wind Plant Costs and Technology Advancements ........................................................ 1 1.1 Offshore Wind Plant Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................. 2 1.1.1 Methodology ......................................................................................................................... 2 1.1.2 Plant Capital Cost Breakdown ............................................................................................ 3 1.2 Technical Trends and Anticipated Advancements ........................................................................ 4 2. Supply Chain Needs to Support U.S. Offshore Industry ............................................................. 17 2.1 Overarching Considerations ............................................................................................................ 18 2.1.1 U.S. Suppliers’ Role in the Global Wind Market ............................................................ 18 2.1.2 Regional Considerations for Offshore Wind Plant Design and Supply ...................... 20 2.2 Assumptions for Estimating Supply Chain Requirements ......................................................... 24 2.2.1 Regional Deployment Scenarios ....................................................................................... 24 2.2.2 Component and Material Requirement Assumptions ................................................... 29 2.2.3 Market Value Assumptions ............................................................................................... 30 2.3 Component-level Requirements and Opportunities .................................................................... 30 2.3.1 Framing the Potential Opportunities ............................................................................... 31 2.3.2 Offshore Wind Turbine Generators.................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Multibrand Service – No Matter the Make High
    Turn to one-of-a-kind service for all kinds of turbines Multibrand Service – no matter the make High The wind industry is going through a critical period of change, and although in OEM: Cost-out OEM: our fast-paced industry change is nothing new, this shake-up is more Bare-bones Driven Engi- Agnostic Ser- Where there’s wind, fundamental than most – with the challenges to match. Inefficient repair loops, ISPs neering some vice Focused unexpected and unbudgeted failures well outside of the warranty period, poorly self performers Engineering monitored equipment with a limited supply chain and even turbine manufac- turers who pull out of markets altogether. Things go wrong when things don’t ISPs redefining there’s a way OEM: Service themselves Some self- turn. So providers and owners must quickly learn to adapt. Which above all else Focused and some self- performers requires one thing: innovative, cost-effective engineering. Engineering Our Multibrand Services stand out – performers With more than 20 years of multibrand OEM service experience, Siemens OEM Prod- for cost and quality Cost Competitiveness Costly Gamesa puts unparalleled assets to work on your behalf. We harness a strong Expensive ISPs uct Focused low value engineering workforce, third-party experts, vast engineering know-how and without value- Engineering: engineering proposition engineering deep market knowledge to improve your LCoE and maximize availability – focused firms no matter the market, no matter the make. focused firms Low Engineering / Innovation Focus In the multibrand service market, the combination of cost efficiency and strong, innovative engineering is rare. But one provider delivers both: Siemens Gamesa Made by our competitors, serviced like our own Your OEM is our USP Turbines and wind make for high-yield assets, but when the time comes for cost-effective service solutions, people are our most valued resource.
    [Show full text]
  • Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Review Gravity-Based Foundations in the Offshore Wind Sector M. Dolores Esteban *, José-Santos López-Gutiérrez and Vicente Negro Research Group on Marine, Coastal and Port Environment and other Sensitive Areas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E28040 Madrid, Spain; [email protected] (J.-S.L.-G.); [email protected] (V.N.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 12 March 2019 Abstract: In recent years, the offshore wind industry has seen an important boost that is expected to continue in the coming years. In order for the offshore wind industry to achieve adequate development, it is essential to solve some existing uncertainties, some of which relate to foundations. These foundations are important for this type of project. As foundations represent approximately 35% of the total cost of an offshore wind project, it is essential that they receive special attention. There are different types of foundations that are used in the offshore wind industry. The most common types are steel monopiles, gravity-based structures (GBS), tripods, and jackets. However, there are some other types, such as suction caissons, tripiles, etc. For high water depths, the alternative to the previously mentioned foundations is the use of floating supports. Some offshore wind installations currently in operation have GBS-type foundations (also known as GBF: Gravity-based foundation). Although this typology has not been widely used until now, there is research that has highlighted its advantages over other types of foundation for both small and large water depth sites. There are no doubts over the importance of GBS.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldwind Brochure-1.5-Web.Indd
    www.goldwindamerica.com E-mail: [email protected] Goldwind USA, Inc. 200 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois, USA Tel: +1 312-948-8050 Fax: +1 312-948-8051 PC: 60601 Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd 107 Shanghai Road, Economic & Technological Development Zone, Urumqi, Xinjiang Tel: +86-(0)991-3767999 PMDD WIND TURBINE Fax: +86-(0)991-3762039 PC: 830026 Beijing Goldwind Science & Creation Windpower Equipment Co., Ltd. No. 19 Kangding Road, Economic & Technological 1.5MW Development Zone, Beijing (I) Tel: +86-(0)10-87857500 Fax: +86-(0)10-87857529 PC: 100176 No. 8 Boxing 1st Road, Economic & Technological Development Zone, Beijing (II) Tel: +86-(0)10-67511888 Fax: +86-(0)10-67511983 PC: 100176 www.goldwindamerica.com E-mail: [email protected] Goldwind USA, Inc. 200 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois, USA Tel: +1 312-948-8050 Fax: +1 312-948-8051 PC: 60601 Xinjiang Goldwind Science & Technology Co., Ltd 107 Shanghai Road, Economic & Technological Development Zone, Urumqi, Xinjiang Tel: +86-(0)991-3767999 PMDD WIND TURBINE Fax: +86-(0)991-3762039 PC: 830026 Beijing Goldwind Science & Creation Windpower Equipment Co., Ltd. No. 19 Kangding Road, Economic & Technological 1.5MW Development Zone, Beijing (I) Tel: +86-(0)10-87857500 Fax: +86-(0)10-87857529 PC: 100176 No. 8 Boxing 1st Road, Economic & Technological Development Zone, Beijing (II) Tel: +86-(0)10-67511888 Fax: +86-(0)10-67511983 PC: 100176 GOLDWIND 1.5MW PMDD WIND TURBINE SERIES DYNAMIC POWER CURVE GENERAL TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Government of India Wind Energy Division
    Ministry of New and Renewable Energy Government of India Wind Energy Division Wind Turbine Models included in the RLMM after declaration of new procedure (i.e 01 November 2018) As on 28.09.2020 S. No Manufacturing Company with contact Company Incorporation Details License/ Model Name Rotor Dia (RD) Hub Height Tower Type Capacity (kW) Type Certificate Manufacturing system Certificate / ISO Certificate details Collaboration/ (m) (HH) (m) Joint Venture Date Document According to Any Outstanding Validity till Document According to Validity till Document Issues 1 M/s. Regen Powertech Private Limited 27-12-2006 Regen CoI VENSYS VENSYS 116 116.1 90 Tubular Steel 2000 ($$) S-Class/Turbulance No 07-11-2021 Vensys 116 TC ISO: 9001 : 2015 29-04-2023 Regen ISO Sivanandam, 1st Floor, New No. 1, Pulla Energy AG, B-Class (GL Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu - Germany 2010/IEC 61400- 600030 1:1999) Phone:044-42966200 2 Fax :044-42966298/99 VENSYS 87 86.6 85 Tubular Steel 1500 IEC Class III B (GL No 26-01-2022 Vensys 87 TC Email: [email protected] 2010) 3 M/s Envision Wind Power Technologies India 12-07-2016 Envision CoI Envision EN 115 2.3 MW 115.9 90.32 Tubular Steel 2300 IEC Class III A No 09-11-2021 Envision EN 115 ISO: 9001: 2015 01-05-2021 Envision ISO (Pvt.) Ltd., Energy(JIANG IEC IIIA (GL/ IEC 61400- TC Level 9, Platina, C-59, G Block, BKC, Bandra SU) Co., Ltd., 22:2010) East, Mumbai-400051 China Tel: 022-67000988 / 080-61296200, Fax: 022-67000600 4 Envision EN2.5-131 131 100 / 120 Tubular Steel 2500 IEC 61400-22:2010 No 11-07-2023 Envision EN 131 Email: [email protected], 50Hz IEC S HH120 [email protected] TC 5 M/s.
    [Show full text]
  • SRI: Wind Power Generation Project Main Report
    Environment Impact Assessment (Draft) May 2017 SRI: Wind Power Generation Project Main Report Prepared by Ceylon Electricity Board, Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy, Democratic Socialist Republic of Sri Lanka for the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 17 May 2017) Currency unit – Sri Lankan rupee/s(SLRe/SLRs) SLRe 1.00 = $0.00655 $1.00 = SLRs 152.70 ABBREVIATIONS ADB – Asian Development Bank CCD – Coast Conservation and Coastal Resource Management Department CEA – Central Environmental Authority CEB – Ceylon Electricity Board DoF – Department of Forest DS – District Secretary DSD – District Secretaries Division DWC – Department of Wildlife Conservation EA – executing agency EIA – environmental impact assessment EMoP – environmental monitoring plan EMP – environmental management plan EPC – engineering,procurement and construction GND – Grama Niladhari GoSL – Government of Sri Lanka GRM – grievance redress mechanism IA – implementing agency IEE – initial environmental examination LA – Local Authority LARC – Land Acquisition and Resettlement Committee MPRE – Ministry of Power and Renewable Energy MSL – mean sea level NARA – National Aquatic Resources Research & Development Agency NEA – National Environmental Act PIU – project implementation unit PRDA – Provincial Road Development Authority PUCSL – Public Utility Commission of Sri Lanka RDA – Road Development Authority RE – Rural Electrification RoW – right of way SLSEA – Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority WT – wind turbine WEIGHTS AND MEASURES GWh – 1 gigawatt hour = 1,000 Megawatt hour 1 ha – 1 hectare=10,000 square meters km – 1 kilometre = 1,000 meters kV – 1 kilovolt =1,000 volts MW – 1 megawatt = 1,000 Kilowatt NOTE In this report, “$” refers to US dollars This environmental impact assessment is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Systems Usa
    Renewable Energy Systems Usa Which Lamar impugns so motherly that Chevalier sleighs her guernseys? Behaviorist Hagen pagings histhat demagnetization! misfeature shrivel protectively and minimised alarmedly. Zirconic and diatonic Griffin never blahs Citizenship information on material in the financing and energy comes next time of backup capacity, for reward center. Energy Systems Engineering Rutgers University School of. Optimization algorithms are ways of computing maximum or minimum of mathematical functions. Please just a valid email. Renewable Energy Degrees FULL LIST & Green Energy Job. Payment options all while installing monitoring and maintaining your solar energy systems. Units can be provided by renewable systems could prevent automated spam filtering or system. Graduates with a Masters in Renewable Energy and Sustainable Systems Engineering and. Learn laugh about renewable resources such the solar, wind, geothermal, and hydroelectricity. Creating good decisions. The renewable systems can now to satisfy these can decrease. In recent years there that been high investment in solar PV, due to favourable subsidies and incentives. Renewable Energy Research developing the renewable carbon-free technologies required to mesh a sustainable future energy system where solar cell. Solar energy systems is renewable power system, and the grid rural electrification in cold water pumped uphill by. Apex Clean Energy develops constructs and operates utility-scale wire and medicine power facilities for the. International Renewable Energy Agency IRENA. The limitation of fossil fuels has challenged scientists and engineers to vocabulary for alternative energy resources that can represent future energy demand. Our solar panels are thus for capturing peak power without our winters, in shade, and, of cellar, full sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Turbine Write Up
    Jankowski 1 Wind Turbine Write up By: Matt Jankowski EDSGN 100 Sec 014 Windmill Background Wind turbines are an essential tool for capturing natural energy and are very simple to understand the mechanisms behind. It’s as simple as instead of using electricity to create wind, such as a fan or an AC unit, wind turbines use wind to create electricity. Humans have used wind to power mechanisms and toys for decades, such as setting sail on a sailboat to flying a kite on a windy day. Then we took those ideas and turned it into a way to create energy. The rotor blades on windmills act as the blades on a helicopter and are set at 20 degree angles, which will produce the most rotor rotation. When the wind blows, it catches on the blades and causes the rotor to spin. The rotor is either directly connected to or connected through a series of gears to a generator. The generator runs, produces electricity and stores it to be used. My Windmill My solidworks model consists of eight different parts, assembled together to make a free-standing horizontal windmill. First, I started by connecting the base and the lower mast with three mates: concentric, coincident and front plane-front plane coincident. I then added the upper mast and swivel shaft, using three mates to add them to the assembly. Next, three blades, the hub and the main shaft were added. To assemble the blades into the hub, I had to make three mates: concentric, coincident, and a 20 degree angle between the right plane and the flat surface of the blade.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment
    U.S. Offshore Wind Power Economic Impact Assessment Issue Date | March 2020 Prepared By American Wind Energy Association Table of Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Current Status of U.S. Offshore Wind .......................................................................................................................................................... 2 Lessons from Land-based Wind ...................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Announced Investments in Domestic Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................ 5 Methodology ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Input Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Modeling Tool ........................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Access Statement April 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN and ACCESS STATEMENT
    Energiekontor UK Ltd Design and Access Statement April 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Site Selection 3 3. Design Influences 7 4. Design Evolution, Amount, Layout and Scale 9 5. Development Description, Appearance and Design 14 6. Access 16 Figures Page 2.1 Site Location 3 2.2 Landscape character areas 4 2.3 1945 RAF Fulbeck site plan 5 2.4 Site selection criteria 6 4.1 First Iteration 10 4.2 Second Iteration 11 4.3 Third Iteration 12 4.4 Fourth Iteration 13 5.1 First Iteration looking SW from the southern edge of Stragglethorpe 14 5.2 Fourth Iteration looking SW from the southern edge of 14 Stragglethorpe 5.3 First Iteration looking east from Sutton Road south of Rectory Lane 15 5.4 Fourth Iteration looking east from Sutton Road south of Rectory Lane 15 6.1 Details of temporary access for turbine deliveries 16 EnergieKontor UK Ltd 1 May 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 1 Introduction The Application 1.8 The Fulbeck Airfield Wind Farm planning application is Context 1.6 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process also submitted in full and in addition to this Design and Access exploits opportunities for positive design, rather than merely Statement is accompanied by the following documents 1.1 This Design and Access Statement has been prepared by seeking to avoid adverse environmental effects. The Design which should be read together: Energiekontor UK Ltd (“EK”) to accompany a planning and Access Statement is seen as having an important role application for the construction, 25 year operation and in contributing to the design process through the clear Environmental Statement Vol 1; subsequent decommissioning of a wind farm consisting of documentation of design evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Suzlon Group: Fact Sheet
    Suzlon Group: Fact Sheet Suzlon Group Suzlon Group, consisting of Suzlon Energy Limited (SEL) and its global subsidiaries, is India’s largest renewable energy solutions provider with presence in 18 countries across six continents. Suzlon has a strong presence across the entire wind value chain with a comprehensive range of services to build and maintain the projects, which include design, supply, installation, commissioning of the project and dedicated life cycle asset management services. Suzlon Group is a market leader in India with over 11.9 GW of installed capacity and global installation of ~ 17.9 GW spread across 17 countries in Asia, Australia, Europe, Africa and Americas. Suzlon’s Global wind installations help in reducing ~38 million tonnes of CO2 emissions every year. The company has an installed manufacturing capacity of 4,200 MW wind turbine generators spread across three Nacelle units in India and one unit in China (Joint venture). Suzlon boasts of a wide range within its 2.1 MW suite of products with varying rotor blade and tower heights suitable for all wind regimes. o The S111-120m (120 meter hub height), lattice-tubular tower prototype turbine commissioned in Gujarat in March 2016 achieved ~42% plant load factor (PLF). It received Type Certification in June, 2016. o The S111-140m (140 meter hub height), is the tallest lattice-tubular tower in the country. The prototype set up in August 2017 at Kutch, Gujarat, has received its Type Certification. It is expected to deliver 44% plant load factor (PLF) than earlier products on the same site location and wind conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm
    The Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm A Popular Initiative 1 Middelgrunden Offshore Wind Farm Number of turbines............. 20 x 2 MW Installed Power.................... 40 MW Hub height......................... 64 metres Rotor diameter................... 76 metres Total height........................ 102 metres Foundation depth................ 4 to 8 metres Foundation weight (dry)........ 1,800 tonnes Wind speed at 50-m height... 7.2 m/s Expected production............ 100 GWh/y Production 2002................. 100 GWh (wind 97% of normal) Park efficiency.................... 93% Construction year................ 2000 Investment......................... 48 mill. EUR Kastrup Airport The Middelgrunden Wind Farm is situated a few kilometres away from the centre of Copenhagen. The offshore turbines are connected by cable to the transformer at the Amager power plant 3.5 km away. Kongedybet Hollænderdybet Middelgrunden Saltholm Flak 2 From Idea to Reality The idea of the Middelgrunden wind project was born in a group of visionary people in Copenhagen already in 1993. However it took seven years and a lot of work before the first cooperatively owned offshore wind farm became a reality. Today the 40 MW wind farm with twenty modern 2 MW wind turbines developed by the Middelgrunden Wind Turbine Cooperative and Copenhagen Energy Wind is producing electricity for more than 40,000 households in Copenhagen. In 1996 the local association Copenhagen Environment and Energy Office took the initiative of forming a working group for placing turbines on the Middelgrunden shoal and a proposal with 27 turbines was presented to the public. At that time the Danish Energy Authority had mapped the Middelgrunden shoal as a potential site for wind development, but it was not given high priority by the civil servants and the power utility.
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Highlights
    G NER Y SE E CU O R T I A T Y N NATO ENERGY SECURITY C E CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE E C N T N R E E LL OF EXCE ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS 1 Content 7 Introduction 11 Chapter 1 – Wind Energy Systems and Technologies 25 Chapter 2 – Radar Systems and Wind Farms 36 Chapter 3 – Wind Farms Interference Mitigation 46 Chapter 4 – Environmental and societal impacts of wind energy 58 Chapter 5 – Wind Farms and Noise 67 Chapter 6 – Energy Storage and Wind Power 74 Chapter 7 – Case Studies 84 Conclusions 86 A Way Forward 87 Bibliography This is a product of the NATO Energy Security Centre of Excellence (NATO ENSEC COE). It is produced for NATO, NATO member countries, NATO partners, related private and public institutions and related individuals. It does not represent the opinions or policies of NATO or NATO ENSEC COE. The views presented in the articles are those of the authors alone. © All rights reserved by the NATO ENSEC COE. Articles may not be copied, reproduced, distributed or publicly displayed without reference to the NATO ENSEC COE and the respective publication. 2 ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS ENERGY HIGHLIGHTS 3 Role of windfarms for national grids – challenges, risks, and chances for energy security by Ms Marju Kõrts ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AND KEY have arisen in other countries wher wind power RECOMMENDATIONS The author would like to acknowledge the work and insights of the people who contributed to this is expanding. study either via the conducted interviews or their fellowship at the NATO Energy Security Center of apid growth of wind energy worldwide Excellence in summer and autumn 2020.
    [Show full text]