Francis H. Pierpont 34

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Francis H. Pierpont 34 Francis H. Pierpont Courtesy of The U niversity of North Carolina Press 34 The City of Alexandria - One Time Capital of Virginia By ROBERT NELSON A NDERSON* Any article dealing with the existence of the City of Alexandria as the one time Capital of Virginia must consider the story of Francis H arrison Pier­ pont who was born in what was then Monongalia Countv, Virginia, on January 25, 1814, for the two are interwoven. School teacher, lawyer, in­ dustrialist, father of the so-called Restored Government of Virginia and its Governor ( 1861-68 ); father of \,Vest Virginia ( 1861-63 ) ; U nited States Congressman ( 1870 ); U .S. Collector of Internal R evenue ( 1881 ) ; he died in Pittsburgh, Pa., at the home of his daughter on M arch 24, 1899, and was buried in Fairmont, vVest Virginia. His was a very full life and we can only touch on the highspots leading up to the establishment of the City of Alexandria as one time Capital of Virginia. 1 But in order to place these particular events in their proper perspective it is necessary to review some of the earlier events and happenings in Virginia and the South that brought this about. By 1840 Virginia began to recover from a severe agricultural depression. But even as Virginia grew more prosperous the agitation over slavery was carrying her down the road to civil war. The controversy over slavery in the territories and the debates over the fugitive slave law made for increased bitterness between North and South during the 1850's but the attempted slave insurrection on Virginia's own soil supported by John Brown of Kansas, an Absolitionist, did most to excite Virginian emotions and fears. The victory of Abraham Lincoln in the presidential election of 1860 led the States of the far South to take a long-threatened step and withdraw from the Union. South -Carolina seceded on December 20, 1860,2 and was followed by five other Southern States, namely : Georgia, Florida, Ala­ bama, Mississippi, and Louisiana. On February 8, 1861 , at Montgomery, Alabama, these six states established a new nation called the Confederate States of America. Although political, economic and social interests drew Virginia toward the Confederacy, Virginians hesitated to withdraw from the U nion their fathers had done so much to establish and maintain. Unionist sentiment was still strong in many areas, particularly in the western part of the State, * Third president of the Arlington H istorical Society and first editor of its Magazine. 1 For greater detail on the life history of Pierpont, see the excellent biography by Charles H .. Ambler, Professor of History, West Virginia University, published by the University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, 1937. 2 See Am erican Heritage Civil War Chronolo gy, New York, 1960, as to this and some other dates herein. 35 and Virginians participated in futile attempts to reach a compromise be­ tween the Lincoln Government at Washington and the Confederates in Montgomery. But on March 1, 1861, the United States Congress formally refused to consider Virginia's peace conference proposals. Three days after the surrender of the Federal garrison at Fort Sumter President Lincoln called for 75,000 volunteers from all the states that were still in the Union to put down the "insurrection" in the South. Governor John Letcher of Virginia refused to provide a single man for this purpose, and on April 17, 1861, a secret Virginia Convention, called in February to consider the Commonwealth's course of action, rather than share in the subjugation of Virginia's sister states, by a vote of 88 to 55 adopted an Ordinance of Secession. 3 The Ordinance of Secession was ratified by the people on May 23, 1861, by a margin of more than six to one. Most of the votes against withdrawal came from the far western counties. Thus Virginia joined the Confederacy just two days after the Confederate Congress had voted (May 21, 1861 ) to move the Confederate Capital to Richmond and from that time on Richmond was the center of the new nation. In the month between the action of the Virginia Convention on Secession and the ratification of this action by the people of Virginia, the only step taken by the defenders of the City of Washington was a limited surreptitious reconnaissance of the areas around the Virginia end of the Aqueduct and Long Bridges. However, on the night of May 23-24, 1861, 10,000 Federal troops crossed the Potomac into Virginia and occupied the City of Alex­ andria and thus, in the words of Miss C. B. Rose, Jr., in her article on "Civil War Forts in Arlington" (The Arlington Historical Magazine­ October 1960, page 14), "beginning for Arlington one of its most important periods historically." In northwest Virginia following the adoption of the Secession Ordinance events moved as rapidly and as illegally as they did east of the mountains at the same time. Of the 47 delegates from what is now ·west Virginia in the Secession Convention at Richmond only fifteen or about 1/3 of the total voted in favor of secession. In the absence of a better criterion this vote may be taken as an index to the sentiments of leaders in northwest Virginia. It is interesting to note that Francis H . Pierpont, who within less than six months was to play a leading role in northwest Virginia, was not a dele­ gate to the Secession Convention at Richmond. An ardent anti-slavery and Union man, he had supported Lincoln in the election of 1860. As early as April 3, 1861, he had written a friend that the difficulty that was develop­ ing between the great sections of the Union could not be "settled without a fight."• , 3 Ordinances Adopted by the Conve ntion of Virginia in Secret, April and May, 1861, p. 3; Acts of General Assembly of the State of Virginia passed in 1861, Richmond, 1861. 4 Charles H . Ambler, Francis H. Pierpont, Chapel Hill, N.C., 193 i ; p. i9. 36 The Virginia Secession Ordinance was no sooner adopted than the people of northwest Virginia including the delegates who had not voted against it, began to express them.selves in opposition. As usual the method was through mass meetings. A large meeting on April 22, 1861, at Clarksburg adopted resolutions recommending among other things that "the people" in each of the counties comprising northwest Virginia elect no less than ,five of "their wisest, best and discreetest men, to meet in Convention on the 13th day of May next ( at Wheeling), to consult and determine upon such action as the peop.le · of Northwestern Virginia should take in the present fearful ernergency."5 The Wheeling Conventions The \,Vheeling Convention for which Pierpont's speeches helped pave the way, met in Washington Hall on the 13th of May 1861 as planned. Present were 430-odd delegates representing 27 counties, all but one of which, Fred­ erick, ·ire now a part of West Virginia. On the second day of the Conven­ tion, John S. Carlisle, who had been a member of the Virginia Secession Convention, revealed his main purpose was to proclaim a "New State" in the Federal Union. However, from the first, leading members of the Wheel­ ing Convention, including Pierpont, opposed Carlisle's plan as precipitate and revolutionary. As a result the \,V heeling Convention merely condemned the Virginia Secession Ordinance as "unconstitutional, null and void" and urged the voters of northwest Virginia to repudiate the Ordinance and to elect the forbidden representatives to the Federal Congress as well as the usual members to the General Assembly. Perhaps the most important action accomplishep was that authorizing "the people" of all counties of northwest Virginia · on the 4th of June to appoint delegates to a General Convention to meet on the 11th of the same month at a place to be indicated later. On the appointed day the body thus assembled met in Washington Hall and ,vas known thenceforth as "the Second \t\1heeling Convention." It consisted of about 100 delegates representing 34 counties, all but two of which, Alexandria and Fairfax, are now a part of \Nest Virginia. With preliminaries out of the way the Convention went through the motions of reorganizing the Government of Virginia, both state and local, on a loyal basis. On June 19th, the Convention adopted "An Ordinance for the Re-organ­ ization of the State Government" of Virginia. c Loyal perso ns elected in the preceding May were declared to be "the Legislature of the State" which was authorized "to discharge the duties and exercise the powers pertaining to the General · Assembly." Until the seal of the Commonwealth could be -, I bid., p . .82. 6 Ordinances of the Convention Assembled at Wheeling, J une 11, 1861, Wheeling, Va., 1861 ; pp. 40-42. 37 Title page of the Ordinances of "the Second Wheeling Convention" which include "An Ordinance for the Reorganization of the State Government" of Virginia [the so-called Restored Government] adopted June 19, 1861, and "An Ordinance to Provide for the Formation of a New State [West Virginia] out of a Portion of the Territory of this State," adopted August 20, 1861. 38 Title page of the Acts of the first General Assembly held after the establishment of the so-called Restored Virginia Government. 39 altered so as to suit the needs of the Restored Government, an order of the Convention authorized the use of the seal of the Commonwealth with· the additional words "Liberty and Union." Through the efforts of Pierpont and others, plans and proposals looking to the immediate dismemberment of Virginia and the formation of a New State were abandoned in a con­ certed effort "to put down rebellion and restore peace to the country." Following the adoption of the Ordinance, Francis H.
Recommended publications
  • Title: West Virginia Road to Statehood Guided Viewing
    Telling West Virginia’s Story Guided Viewing and the Election of 1860 Objective: Students will learn the impact of the presidential election of 1860 on the people of western Virginia and the steps taken in the formation of the state of West Virginia Grade Level and Subject: Eighth Grade West Virginia Studies Time Needed to Complete Lesson: Guided Viewing only: film 47 minutes Quiz: 30 minutes Election of 1860 Activity: 75 minutes Overall Lesson: Three to five 50 minute class periods Strategic Vocabulary: abolitionist – one who wished to end slavery right away. amendment – the act or process of changing a law. cavalry – an army component mounted on horseback emancipation – freeing of the slaves free state – a state that did not permit slavery. ordinance – a regulation or decree; often used to refer to a municipal law. proclamation – an official or public announcement. secede – to withdraw from the Union. sectionalism – putting one’s section of the country ahead of the nation as a whole. slave state – a state that permitted slavery. slavery - the practice of owning people as property and forcing those people to work for a slaveholder. Guiding Questions 1. What role did the Election of 1860 play in the separation of Virginia? 2. What were the steps taken to create West Virginia? 3. How could West Virginia be called an illegal state? 1 List of Materials Needed 1. WVPBS video: West Virginia: Road to Statehood 3. Guided Viewing Worksheets 4. Quiz 5. Printed 1860 Party Platform (found in the appendix) or Computer lab with links for students. Text Set File (copies of documents can be found in the appendix) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • History Curriculum Framework 2008
    HISTORY AND SOCIAL SCIENCE STANDARDS OF LEARNING CURRICULUM FRAMEWORK 2008 VViirrggiinniiaa SSttuuddiieess Board of Education Commonwealth of Virginia Copyright © 2008 by the Virginia Department of Education P. O. Box 2120 Richmond, Virginia 23218-2120 http://www.doe.virginia.gov All rights reserved. Reproduction of these materials for instructional purposes in public school classrooms in Virginia is permitted. Superintendent of Public Instruction Billy K. Cannaday, Jr. Chief Deputy Superintendent of Public Instruction Patricia I. Wright Assistant Superintendent for Instruction Linda M. Wallinger Office of Elementary Instructional Services Mark R. Allan, Director Betsy S. Barton, History and Social Science Specialist Office of Middle and High School Instructional Services Felicia D. Dyke, Director Beverly M. Thurston, History and Social Science Coordinator Edited by the CTE Resource Center http://CTEresource.org NOTICE The Virginia Department of Education does not unlawfully discriminate on the basis of race, color, sex, national origin, age, or disability in employment or in its educational programs or services. INTRODUCTION The History and Social Science Standards of Learning Curriculum Framework 2008, approved by the Board of Education on July 17, 2008, is a companion document to the 2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning for Virginia Public Schools. The Curriculum Framework amplifies the Standards of Learning by defining the content understandings, knowledge, and skills that are measured by the Standards of Learning assessments. The Curriculum Framework provides additional guidance to school divisions and their teachers as they develop an instructional program appropriate for their students. It assists teachers in their lesson planning by identifying the essential content understandings, knowledge, and intellectual skills that should be the focus of instruction for each standard.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Appalachia
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Appalachian Studies Arts and Humanities 2-28-2001 A History of Appalachia Richard B. Drake Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Drake, Richard B., "A History of Appalachia" (2001). Appalachian Studies. 23. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_appalachian_studies/23 R IC H ARD B . D RA K E A History of Appalachia A of History Appalachia RICHARD B. DRAKE THE UNIVERSITY PRESS OF KENTUCKY Publication of this volume was made possible in part by grants from the E.O. Robinson Mountain Fund and the National Endowment for the Humanities. Copyright © 2001 by The University Press of Kentucky Paperback edition 2003 Scholarly publisher for the Commonwealth, serving Bellarmine University, Berea College, Centre College of Kenhlcky Eastern Kentucky University, The Filson Historical Society, Georgetown College, Kentucky Historical Society, Kentucky State University, Morehead State University, Murray State University, Northern Kentucky University, Transylvania University, University of Kentucky, University of Louisville, and Western Kentucky University. All rights reserved. Editorial and Sales Offices: The University Press of Kentucky 663 South Limestone Street, Lexington, Kentucky 40508-4008 www.kentuckypress.com 12 11 10 09 08 8 7 6 5 4 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Drake, Richard B., 1925- A history of Appalachia / Richard B.
    [Show full text]
  • VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A
    VMI Men Who Wore Yankee Blue, 1861-1865 by Edward A. Miller, ]r. '50A The contributions of Virginia Military Institute alumni in Confed­ dent. His class standing after a year-and-a-half at the Institute was erate service during the Civil War are well known. Over 92 percent a respectable eighteenth of twenty-five. Sharp, however, resigned of the almost two thousand who wore the cadet uniform also wore from the corps in June 1841, but the Institute's records do not Confederate gray. What is not commonly remembered is that show the reason. He married in early November 1842, and he and thirteen alumni served in the Union army and navy-and two his wife, Sarah Elizabeth (Rebeck), left Jonesville for Missouri in others, loyal to the Union, died in Confederate hands. Why these the following year. They settled at Danville, Montgomery County, men did not follow the overwhelming majority of their cadet where Sharp read for the law and set up his practice. He was comrades and classmates who chose to support the Common­ possibly postmaster in Danville, where he was considered an wealth and the South is not difficult to explain. Several of them important citizen. An active mason, he was the Danville delegate lived in the remote counties west of the Alleghenies where to the grand lodge in St. Louis. In 1859-1860 he represented his citizens had long felt estranged from the rest of the state. Citizens area of the state in the Missouri Senate. Sharp's political, frater­ of the west sought to dismember Virginia and establish their own nal, and professional prominence as well as his VMI military mountain state.
    [Show full text]
  • The King's Charters
    ©Melissa Matusevich ©Melissa Matusevich The King’s Charters House of Burgesses The King of England granted charters to the Virginia Company of London. A charter is an official document that tells the limits of the rights and duties of the group it is given to. The charters were important for many reasons: 1. The charters gave the Virginia Company The Virginia House of Burgesses was the the right to establish (set up) a settlement first elected legislative body in America in North America. 2. The first charter of the Virginia Company giving settlers the opportunity to control of London established companies to begin their own government. colonies in the New World. It became the General Assembly of 3. The charters extended English rights to Virginia, which continues to this day. the colonists. ©Melissa Matusevich . Government in the New Colony . g g n n i House of Burgesses i d d l l i i u u b b l l d d o o n n t t i i o o p p a a m m c c h h c c s s i ’ i ’ a a R R i i n n n n i i i i g g r r g g i i n n V V i i d d d d l l e e i i n n u u g g B B i i s s l In 1619 only adult men were considered citizens. l e e o o t d t Men who served as representatives in the government d i i n n p were called “burgesses.” p o o a In 1619, the governor of Virginia called a meeting of the a s s C C r r Virginia Assembly.
    [Show full text]
  • Representative Government Trail
    VIRGINIA HISTORY TRAILS: REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT TRAIL Virginia is the birthplace of our democracy. America’s representative government began when Virginia’s first General Assembly met in 1619. Below is a list of sites and stories on the Representative Government themed trail on Virginia History Trails. Central Virginia • Adele Goodman Clark, Richmond, VA • Buffalo Church, Pamplin, VA • Civil Rights Movement, Richmond, VA • Cynthia Dinah Fannon Kinser, Richmond, VA • Elizabeth Bermingham Lacy, Richmond, VA • Eva Fleming Scott, Richmond, VA • Executive Mansion, Richmond, VA • Hermanze E. Fauntleroy Jr./ Dr. Florence Farley, Petersburg, VA • Highland, Charlottesville, VA • James Madison, Montpelier Station, VA • James Madison Museum, Orange, VA • James Monroe, Charlottesville, VA • Jamestown Discovery Trail, Henrico, VA • Jerry Falwell Museum & Library, Lynchburg, VA • John Marshall, Richmond, VA • John Mercer Langston, Louisa, VA • Joseph Jenkins Roberts (Liberia), Petersburg, VA • L. Douglas Wilder Elected Governor, Richmond, VA • Leroy Rountree Hassell, Richmond, VA • Mattaponi Indians, King William County, VA • Moton School Strike, Farmville, VA • Patrick Henry, Beaverdam, VA • Patrick Henry’s Scotchtown, Beaverdam, VA • Red Hill Patrick Henry Natl. Memorial, Brookneal, VA • Reverend L. Francis Griffin Sr., Farmville, VA • Richmond Liberty Trail, Richmond, VA • Richmond Theater Fire, Richmond, VA • Road to Revolution Heritage Trail, Richmond, VA • State Capitol, Richmond, VA • Thomas Jefferson, Charlottesville, VA • Virginia Anti-Saloon
    [Show full text]
  • The End of Slavery in West Virginia
    W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 5-2011 It Took a War: The End of Slavery in West Virginia Mark Guerci College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Guerci, Mark, "It Took a War: The End of Slavery in West Virginia" (2011). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 381. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/381 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 0 It Took a War: The End of Slavery in West Virginia A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Arts in History from the College of William and Mary by Mark Guerci Accepted for (Honors, High Honors, Highest Honors) Scott Nelson, Director Melvin Ely Clyde Haulman Williamsburg, VA April 14, 2011 1 Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………………………………2 Chapter I: It Takes But a Very Few Slaves…………………………………………...13 Chapter II: A House Divided, Pressured, and Radicalized………………………..…35 Chapter III: The Natural Consequences of a State of War…………………………..56 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….72 Bibliography……………………………………………………………………………..74 Maps…………………………………..………………………………………………….79 2 Introduction For many of Waitman Willey‘s constituents, the urgency was palpable. As frustration in the first year of the Civil War turned Northern opinion toward more drastic war measures, Virginians west of the Allegheny Mountains saw an opportunity to free themselves from a government in Richmond dominated by eastern slaveholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hostages in Civil War Virginia and West Virginia
    Crossing into War: Hostages in Civil War Virginia and West Virginia Randall S. Gooden Introduction Secession and civil war presented Virginia with perhaps the most difficult crossroads in its history. The state’s government wrestled with the choice over secession, and when secession came, a substantial part of the state’s legislators and local officials—particularly in the west and along the Potomac River—resisted the decision. Resistors declared the state government in Richmond void and organized a state government, based in Wheeling and designed to keep Virginia in the United States. While the state government in Richmond declared allegiance to the Confederate States of America and gave support to its military, the government at Wheeling supported the military efforts of the United States. As an adjunct to the creation of Virginia’s pro-Union government, a new state formed in the midst of the Civil War and the dispute over state government legitimacy. West Virginia came into being in 1863 with the permission of the Virginia government at Wheeling and was admitted to the Union as a new state. It established its capital at Wheeling, while the pro-Union government of Virginia moved its headquarters to Alexandria, which had been quickly occupied by federal forces soon after Virginia seceded. In each of these transitions of government, the people of Virginia stood at forks in the road. Individually, Virginians had to choose whether to follow the government in Richmond, which possessed the institutional legacies of the state, in adhering to the South and the Confederacy or whether to follow the upstart government in Wheeling in order to remain aligned with the United States and retain connections with the North and Midwest.
    [Show full text]
  • West Virginia Semi-Centennial March Song and Two-Step
    i:=11 • • (Second Edition) Dedicated to the ., I West Virginia Semi-Centennial From the Collections of Ohio County Public Library Archives | www.ohiocountylibrary.org • • HARRY ELMER STUPP MARCH SONG AND TWO-STEP WORDS BY James Arthur Mills I MUSIC BY Harry Elmer Stupp II.' 1...._____.1'. • PUBLISHED BY WEST VIRGINIA MUSIC CO. WHEELING, W. VA. JAMES ARTHUR MILLS MUlLS ~IO~ 10 ,.J; • 1c::J1 II N , .....; ____________________ _______________ _________________ _ -~==:::::;:=====================-~'1=-l1 =======::;:===:_ I @Jrmt-Q.trntrunial~rmt-Qtrutruutal @Jnithrnir ~nubrutr' Lazier then addressed the assemblage, Carlile accepted,accepted this amendment toto stating that the proceedings should his resolution and added the follow-follow­ be marked with calmness and delib­ delib-ing: "That the committee reportreport a eration. Mr. Willey rose to a question time for thll,thlJ, reassembling of this of personal privilege and explained convention." He said that he had that his remarks of the day before not changed his opinion but he was had been misrepresented; that he anxious to see a spirit of harmony. was in favor of a division of the state, He doubted whether the convention but by peaceful means, if possible. would be allowed toto meet at the time but said that if God spared James S. Wheat of Wheeling, thenthen appointed, but said that if God spared James S. Wheat of Wheeling, him he would be there. On motion presented a series of resolutions from him he would be there. On motion the committee on federal relations,of Daniel Lamb, the reportreport and s sub-ub­ the committee on federal relations, stitute were reportedreported backba.ck to the,the, From setting forth the abuses of the Rich­ Rich·committee without instructions.
    [Show full text]
  • The War in West Virginia Essay
    Essential Civil War Curriculum | Richard H. Owens Ph.D., The Civil War in West Virginia | August 2014 The Thirty-Fifth Star: The Civil War in West Virginia By Richard H. Owens, Ph.D., West Liberty University Political Background Without question, the extent, scope, and importance of military engagements fought in the areas of the Old Dominion that became the state of West Virginia were far less significant than the political events in that region. No battle fought in what is now present-day West Virginia equaled in scope or import any of the more famous Civil War conflicts. Most encounters were more skirmishes rather than full-scale battles by Civil War standards. However, military events in the Civil War did have an important effect and parallel influence on politics and political alignments in the emerging anti-Virginia secessionist movement in the western counties of Virginia. The Blue Ridge mountain range became a convenient eastern border for West Virginia. In addition to an historical and symbolic division between eastern and western Virginia, the line of the Blue Ridge also provided a defense against potential (albeit unlikely) Confederate invasion. That line also corresponded to the line of United States military influence and control, or the lack of Confederate military influence or interest, throughout most of the Civil War. Most of the eastern and southern counties included in the new state of West Virginia did not support separate statehood. They were included for political, economic, and military purposes. The wishes of those citizens were largely disregarded. But they were under Federal military influence or lacked Confederate military pressure.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virginia Bill of Rights, 3 Wash
    Washington and Lee Law Review Volume 3 | Issue 2 Article 3 Spring 3-1-1942 The irV ginia Bill Of Rights Leonard C. Helderman Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, and the Constitutional Law Commons Recommended Citation Leonard C. Helderman, The Virginia Bill Of Rights, 3 Wash. & Lee L. Rev. 225 (1941), https://scholarlycommons.law.wlu.edu/wlulr/vol3/iss2/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington and Lee Law Review at Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington and Lee Law Review by an authorized editor of Washington & Lee University School of Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1942] THE VIRGINIA BILL OF RIGHTS THE VIRGINIA BILL OF RIGHTS LEONARD C. HELDERMAN* In the quarter century following the outbreak of the American Revolution no less than eight great pronouncements on human liberty were given to the world: the Virginia Dedaration of Rights, the Deda- ration of Independence, the Massachusetts Bill of Rights, the Vir- ginia Statute for Religious Freedom, the Ordinance of 1787, the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen, the Ten Amendments to the Constitution and Jefferson's First Inaugural. All of these save one were American and at least five were Virginian. The Virginia Declaration of Rights came first in point of time and, as George Mason, its author, said, "was closely imitated by the other United States." Let us first examine its origin.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Facts on Virginia
    History and Facts on Virginia Capitol Building, Richmond 3 HISTORY AND FACTS ON VIRGINIA In 1607, the first permanent English settlement in America was established at Jamestown. The Jamestown colonists also established the first representative legislature in America in 1619. Virginia became a colony in 1624 and entered the union on June 25, 1788, the tenth state to do so. Virginia was named for Queen Elizabeth I of England, the “Virgin Queen” and is also known as the “Old Dominion.” King Charles II of England gave it this name in appreciation of Virginia’s loyalty to the crown during the English Civil War of the mid-1600s. Virginia is designated as a Commonwealth, along with Kentucky, Massachusetts, and Pennsylvania. In 1779, the capital was relocated from Williamsburg to Richmond. The cornerstone for the Virginia Capitol Building was laid on August 18, 1785, and the building was completed in 1792. Modeled after the Maison Carrée at Nîmes, France, the Capitol was the first public building in the United States to be built using the Classical Revival style of architecture. Thomas Jefferson designed the central section of the Capitol, including its most outstanding feature: the interior dome, which is undetectable from the exterior. The wings were added in 1906 to house the Senate and House of Delegates. In 2007, in time to receive the Queen of England during the celebration of the 400th anniversary of the Jamestown Settlement, the Capitol underwent an extensive restoration, renovation and expansion, including the addition of a state of the art Visitor’s Center that will ensure that it remains a working capitol well into the 21st Century.
    [Show full text]