Purification and Propertiesof a DNA-Binding Protein With

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Purification and Propertiesof a DNA-Binding Protein With Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 73, No. 7, pp. 2249-2253, July 1976 Biochemistry Purification and properties of a DNA-binding protein with characteristics expected for the Cro protein of bacteriophage X, a repressor essential for lytic growth (bacteriophage X cro gene/promoter-operator DNA) ATIS FOLKMANIS, YOSHINORI TAKEDA, JOSEF SIMUTH, GARY GUSSIN*, AND HARRISON ECHOLS Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Calif. 94720, and * Department of Zoology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242 Communicated by A. D. Kaiser, April 14, 1976 ABSTRACT The Cro protein specified by bacteriophage X viously (8), X DNA was labeled with P2p by growth of phage in is a repressor essential for normal lytic growth of the virus, thus low phosphate medium containing 5 ,Ci/ml of UP-labeled having a physiological role distinct from that of cI, the repressor that maintains lyso We have purified a X-specific DNA- inorganic phosphate. Phage were purified by precipitation with binding protein witheny.the requirements for synthesis and bio- polyethylene glycol and centrifugation to equilibrium in a CsCI chemical activities expected for Cro protein from studies in vivo. density gradient (2-3 times). DNA was extracted with redis- As isolated, the protein appears to be a dimer of molecular tilled phenol, the phenol was removed by extraction with ether, weight approximately 18,000 with DNA-binding properties that and the DNA was dialyzed into and stored in 10mM Tris-HCl, are very similar, but not identical, to those of the cI protein. We 0.2 mM EDTA, at pH 7.3. infer that bacteriophage X uses the same regulatory region of DNA for two different DNA-binding repressor proteins with DNA-Binding Assay. The DNA-binding assay used to seek subtle differences in binding activity specialized for different the activity of Cro protein has been described previously (7, 8). physiological roles. The assay measures retention of X [32P]DNA on a nitrocellulose filter (B-6, Schleicher and Schuell) by virtue of its tight binding The temperate bacteriophage X specifies two different repressor to a specific DNA-binding protein; an excess (100-fold) of un- proteins, cI and Cro, which play a major role in regulation of labeled "chicken blood" DNA (Calbiochem) is added to com- viral development. Each appears to have a specialized physi- pete for the binding of proteins that associate with DNA but ological role for one of the two possible life styles that the phage lack specificity for X DNA (22). The assay mixture contained: can pursue: lysogeny or lysis. The cI protein maintains lysogeny 0.2 ,ug of X [32PJDNA, 20 ,g of "chicken blood" DNA, 10mM through a repression of transcription of the genes essential for Tris'HCI at pH 7.3, 20 mM KCI, 10 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM di- the earliest stage of lytic development; the Cro protein poten- thiothreitol, and 0.2 mM EDTA, in a total volume of 0.1 ml. tiates lytic growth through a repression of the early gene region One unit of DNA-binding activity is defined as the quantity during the late stage of lytic development (1-4) (A. Folkmanis, sufficient to retain 1 Mug of X DNA on the filter. The binding P. Mellon, H. Echols, and A. Skalka, manuscript in preparation). values are corrected for a "background" of DNA that is retained In spite of their different physiological functions, the bio- on the filter in the absence of binding proteins; this varies from chemical activities of the two proteins have been inferred from 5 to 15% with DNA preparation. in vivo experiments to be quite similar: inhibition of tran- Purification of Presumptive Cro Protein. Thirty liters of scription originating at the early promoters PL and PR (Fig. 1); C600 Su- cells were grown in a broth medium (1% Difco however, cI appears to stimulate transcription from the cI gene tryptone, 0.5% Difco yeast extract, 0.5% NaCI, 0.2% maltose) promoter PM during the maintenance of lysogeny, whereas Cro in three carboys. At a density of 4 X 108 cell per ml, cells were probably shuts off this transcription (see refs. 1-4 for a more infected with cIaml4Nam53vlvS phage at a multiplicity of detailed discussion). 10 phage per cell; 25 min after infection, crushed ice was added The cI protein has been purified and extensively character- and the cells were harvested by centrifugation in a Spinco 170 ized in vitro for both specific binding to X DNA and capacity continuous flow rotor. The cells were resuspended in 340 ml to repress RNA synthesis (5-9). The action of the Cro protein of 10% sucrose, 0.05 M Tris-HCI at pH 7.3, and were quick has previously been defined only through an analysis in vio. frozen in a dry ice-alcohol bath. The frozen cells were placed This report describes the purification of a DNA-binding protein in an ice bath for 20 min and then held at 200 until melted. At with properties expected for Cro protein and a partial charac- this time 34 ml of a solution of 0.25 M Tris.HCI at pH 7.3, 0.001 terization of its binding to the operator region that regulates M EDTA, 2 mg/ml of lysozyme and 18 ml of 2 M KC1 were early X genes. added and the mixture was kept at 00 for 40 min. The mixture was then made 0.01 M in MgCl2, the temperature was raised MATERIALS AND METHODS to 32', 0.5 mg of DNAse I was added, and after the addition of Bacteriophage and Bacteria. The Escherichia coli strains the DNAse had decreased the viscosity (about 5 min), the used and their relevant genetic characteristics were: W3350 Su- mixture was placed in an ice bath. Then 36 ml of 2 M KCI was (10), C600 Su+ (10), and C600 Su- (11). The X phage mutations added and the lysate was centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 4 hr in used were: cI gene mutations cIts857 (12), cltsAt2 (13), clam 14 a Spinco 30 rotor. The supernatant fraction was then dialyzed (36); N gene mutations Nam53 and Nam7 (10); cro gene in Spectrapor no. 1 membrane tubing (Spectrum Medical In- mutations fedl (13) tof2 and tof6 (14); operator region point dustries) for 4 hr with one change against buffer A [10 mM mutations v2, vl, v3 (15, 16), vS326 (17), and prmll6 (18); and KPO4 at pH 6.35, 0.2 mM EDTA, 0.2 mM dithiothreitol, 5% operator region substitution mutations bio24-5 (19), imm434 (vol/vol) glycerol] with 0.1 M KC1. The dialyzed extract was (20), and imm2l (21). then applied to a 2.5 X 10 cm column of phosphocellulose Preparation of Phage DNA. Essentially as described pre- (Whatman P11) at a rate of 1.5 ml/min. The column was 2249 Downloaded by guest on September 26, 2021 2250 Biochemistry: Folkmanis et al. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 73 (1976) 40 cro Recomb. genes clII N Ci cro cII Repin. genes -0. ci PM c 0 FIG. 1. The activity of cI and Cro inferred from experiments in co vivo. To maintain the repression essential for the B 20 lysogeny, cI protein z acts at OL and OR to repress leftward and rightward transcription in- 0 itiated at the early promoter sites PL and PR, respectively; the cI protein probably also activates leftward transcription of the cI gene 0N initiated at the maintenance promoter PM. The repression activity of cI keeps the entire phage genome repressed because the N gene product is required as a positive regulator of other genes. The Cro protein acts to turn off (or turn down) the expression of early genes during the late stage of lytic development, presumably through its capacity to act at OL and OR to repress early gene transcription; the Cro protein probably also represses transcription of the cI gene ini- 10 15 tiated at PM. After infection the initial transcription of the cI gene Tube Number occurs through activation by cII and c1II at a site to the right of the FIG. 2. cro gene. (See refs. 1-4.) Repin., replication; Recomb., recombination. Sedimentation properties of Cro activity. Material frac- tionated on phosphocellulose was sedimented in a 10-30% (vol/vol) glycerol gradient containing 0.4 M KCI at 50,000 rpm for 24 hr. washed with buffer A plus 0.1 M KCI and then eluted with a Fractions were collected and aliquots were assayed for DNA-binding 180 ml linear gradient (0.1 M to 1.0 M KCl) in buffer A. activity as described in Materials and Methods. Sedimentation was The X-specific DNA-binding activity eluted at from right to left. Arrows denote the position of marker proteins (B 0.35-0.45 M = bovine serum albumin, 0 = ovalbumin, C = chymotrypsin, and M KCI. These fractions were concentrated by precipitation with = myoglobin) ofmolecular weights 65,000,45,000,25,000, and 17,000, ammonium sulfate (80% saturation), and half of this sample was respectively. (0), DNA-binding activity for X DNA; (0), DNA-binding fractionated on a 2.5 X 81 cm column of Sephadex G-75 activity for Ximm434 DNA. (Pharmacia) in buffer A plus 0.4 M KCI (see Fig. 2 in Results). The Sephadex fractions with X-specific DNA-binding activity were diluted with buffer A to 0.1 M KCI (determined by con- would reflect Cro activity. We also included the operator region ductivity) and refractionated on a 2 X 3 cm phosphocellulose mutations vlv3 to try to reduce any self-repression by Cro column.
Recommended publications
  • Pamela L. Mellon, Ph.D
    Pamela L. Mellon, Ph.D. Vice-Chair for Research, Department of Reproductive Medicine Distinguished Professor, Departments of Reproductive Medicine and Neurosciences Director, Center for Reproductive Science and Medicine University of California, San Diego, School of Medicine 3A14 Leichtag Biomedical Research Building 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093-0674 (858) 534-1312, Fax (858) 534-1438, e-mail: [email protected] Departmental Web page: http://repromed.ucsd.edu/divisions/endocrinology/mellon.shtml Laboratory Web Page: http://repro.ucsd.edu/Mellon/SitePages/home.aspx ORCID 0000-0002-8856-0410 EDUCATION B.A., 1975, University of California at Santa Cruz Degrees in both Biology and Chemistry with Highest Honors Ph.D., 1979, University of California at Berkeley Department of Molecular Biology Dissertation: Two Transforming Genes and Three Replicative Genes of Avian RNA Tumor Viruses: Identification, Gene Order, and Gene Expression APPOINTMENTS Research Associate, 1975, University of California at Berkeley Department of Molecular Biology with Dr. Harrison Echols Postdoctoral Fellow with Dr. Tom Maniatis 1979-1980, California Institute of Technology, Division of Biology 1980-1984, Harvard University, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Assistant Professor 1984-1990, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Regulatory Biology Laboratory Assistant Adjunct Professor 1988-1991, University of California, San Diego Associate Professor 1990-1991, The Salk Institute for Biological Studies, Regulatory Biology Laboratory Associate
    [Show full text]
  • Journal of Virology
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY VOLUME 37 0 NUMBER 1 0 JANUARY 1981 EDITORIAL BOARD Robert R. Wagner, Editor-in-Chief (1982) University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville Dwight L. Anderson, Editor (1983) Haold S. Ginsberg, Editor (1984) School ofDentistry, Columbia University University of Minnesota, New York, N. Y. Minneapolis David T. Denhardt, Editor (1982) Edward M. Scolnick, Editor (1982) University of Western Ontario National Cancer Institute London, Ontario, Canada Bethesda, Md. David Baltimore (1981) Calderon Howe (1982) Dan S. Ray (1983) Amiya K. Banerjee (1982) Alice S. Huang (1981) M. E. Reichmann (1982) Kenneth I. Berns (1982) Tony Hunter (1983) Bernard E. Reilly (1983) David H. L. Bishop (1982) D. C. Kelly (1982) Wiliam S. Robinson (1983) David Botstein (1982) Thomas J. Kelly, Jr. (1982) Bernard Roizman (1982) Dennis T. Brown (1981) George Khoury (1981) Roland R. Rueckert (1982) Ahmad 1. Bukhari (1981) Jonathan A. King (1981) Norman P. Salzman (1981) Purnell Cboppin (1983) David W. Kingsbury (1982) Joseph Sambrook (1982) John M. Coffin (1983) Daniel Kolakofsky (1983) PrisciUa A. Schaffer (1981) Richard W. Compans (1982) Lloyd M. Kozboff (1982) Sondra Schlesinger (1983) Geoffrey M. Cooper (1981) Robert M. Krug (1983) June R. Scott (1983) Clive Dickson (1981) Robert A. Lazzarini 1981) Phillip A. Sharp (1982) Walter Doerfler (1983) Richard A. Lerner (1981) Aaron J. Shatkin (1982) Harrison Echols (1981) Myron Levine (1982) Saul J. Sllverstein (1982) Elvera Ehrenfeld (1983) Tomas Lindahl (1981) Lee D. Simon (1981) Robert N. Eisenman (1982) Douglas R. Lowy (1983) Kai Simons (1981) Suzanne U. Emerson (1983) Ronald B. Luftig (1981) Patrcia G. Spear (1981) Lynn Enquist (1981) Robert Martin (1981) Mark F.
    [Show full text]
  • Duplication Mutation As an SOS Response in Escherichia Coli
    Copyright 0 1989 by the Genetics Society of America Duplication Mutation as anSOS Response in Escherichia coli: Enhanced Duplication Formationby a Constitutively Activated RecA Joan Dimpfl and Harrison Echols Department of Molecular Biology, University of CaE$ornia, Berkeley, California 94720 Manuscript received March 10, 1989 Accepted for publication July 6, 1989 ABSTRACT The SOS response in Escherichia coli involves the induction of a multioperon regulatory system, which copes withthe presence of DNA lesions that interfere with DNA replication. Induction depends on activation of the RecA protein to cleave the LexA repressor of SOS operons. In addition to inducible DNA repair, the SOS system producesa large increasein the frequency of point mutations. To examine the possibility that other types of mutations are induced as partof the SOS response, we have studied the production of tandem duplications.To avoid the complications of indirect effectsof the DNA lesions, we have activated the SOS response by a constitutive mutation in the recA gene, recA730. The introduction of the recA730 mutation results in an increase in duplications in the range of tenfold or greater, as judged by two different criteria. Based on its genetic requirements, the pathway for induced duplication formation is distinct from the point mutation pathway and also differs from the major normal recombination pathway.The induction of pathways for both duplica- tions and point mutationsshows that the SOS system produces a broad mutagenic response.We have suggested previously that many typesof mutations might be inducedby severe environmental stress, thereby enhancing genetic variationin an endangered population. HE introduction of a replication-inhibitinglesion deletions, translocations) (ECHOLS198 1 ; 1982; Mc- T (by UV light or a chemical mutagen) into the DONALD1984).
    [Show full text]
  • Activity of the Hsp7o Chaperone Complex-Dnak, Dnaj, And
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 12108-12111, December 1992 Biochemistry Activity of the Hsp7O chaperone complex-DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE- in initiating phage A DNA replication by sequestering and releasing A P protein (heat shock proteins/DNA replication/protein-protein interaction) HEIDI J. HOFFMANN, SUSAN K. LYMAN, CHI Lu, MARIE-AGNES PETIT, AND HARRISON ECHOLS Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Contributed by Harrison Echols, September 24, 1992 ABSTRACT Initiation of DNA replication by phage A occurs efficiently with less DnaK, and the unwinding reaction requires the ordered assembly and disassembly ofa specialized is more often bidirectional, indicating a more efficient disas- nucleoprotein structure at the origin of replication. In the sembly reaction (C. Wyman, C. Vasilikiotis, D. Ang, C. disasembly pathway, a set of Escherichia coli heat shock Georgopoulos, and H.E., unpublished work). Based on a proteins termed the Hsp7O complex-DnaK, DnaJ, and variety of data, the three-protein set of heat shock proteins GrpE-act with ATP to release A P protein from the nucleo- appears likely to function typically together. DnaJ and GrpE protein complex, freeing the DnaB helicase for its DNA- markedly stimulate the ATPase activity of DnaK, the bac- unwinding reaction. To investigate the mechanism of the terial homolog ofthe eukaryotic -70-kDa heat shock protein release reaction, we have exmned the interaction between P Hsp7O (14). Moreover, the three-protein set ("Hsp7O com- and the three heat shock proteins by glycerol gradient sedi- plex") acts together in other reactions, including control of mentation and gel electrophoresis.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity of the Purified Mutagenesis Proteins Umuc, Umud', and Reca
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 10777-10781, November 1992 Biochemistry Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III (SOS respon/fdelity of DNA repfcatlon/umutatlo) MALINI RAJAGOPALANt, CHI Lut, ROGER WOODGATEtt, MIKE O'DONNELL§, MYRON F. GOODMAN$, AND HARRISON ECHOLSt tDivision of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; 1Department of Microbiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY 10021; and IDepartment of Biological Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 Contributed by Harrison Echols, August 17, 1992 ABSTRACT The introduction of a replication-inhibiting SOS mutagenesis (C. Bonner, S. Creighton and M.F.G., lesion Into the DNA ofEscherichia colU generates the Induced, unpublished work). multigene SOS response. One component of the SOS response Together, the studies noted above give clear indications is a marked increase in mutation rate, de t on RecA that SOS mutagenesis is a consequence ofreplicative bypass protein and the induced muta p us UmuC and of DNA lesions mediated by a damage-localized nucleopro- UmuD. A variety of previous indirect ap es have Indi- tein complex involving RecA, UmuC-UmuD', and pol III-a cated that SOS mutagenesi results from replicative bypass of "mutasome" (14, 17). However, direct evidence for such a the DNA lesion by DNA polymerase (pol ) me in pathway has been lacking in the absence of a defined bio- a reaction mediated by RecA, UmuC, and a prcsd form of chemical system. In the work reported here, we have used UmuD termed UmuD'.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment and Maintenance of Repression by Bacteriophage Lambda: the Role of the Ci, Cit, and Ciii Proteins (E
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 68, No. 9, pp. 2190-2194, September 1971 Establishment and Maintenance of Repression by Bacteriophage Lambda: The Role of the ci, cit, and ciII Proteins (E. coli/lysogeny versus lysis/cy- mutants/DNA binding) HARRISON ECHOLS AND LINDA GREEN Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Calif. 94720 Communicated by A. D. Kaiser, July 8, 1971 ABSTRACT To define the events necessary for the provided by the cI protein; for example, an inhibition of establishment and maintenance of repression in a X- of late proteins might delay the late stage of lytic infected cell, we have studied the requirements for efficient synthesis synthesis of the cI protein ("X-repressor"). Three classes development until cl-mediated repression can take over (3). of X mutants defective in the establishment of repression Another plausible mechanism involves timing the estab- are also defective in the appearance of cI protein activity lishment of repression by the time of synthesis of cI protein; at the normal time. Two of these mutational classes (cII- this possibility is suggested by the finding that the syn- and cIII-) probably result from inactivation of X-specified proteins, but the third class (cy-) may involve a structural thesis of cI protein is subject to regulation (4). defect. We conclude that at least three regulatory elements Since active clI and cII genes are essential for the effective are likely to be required for the normal turn-on of cI pro- establishment of lysogeny in an infected cell, but not for the tein synthesis in an infected nonlysogenic cell: clI and maintenance of lysogeny (5), the cII and cIII proteins are cIII proteins and an "active" y-region of X DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Stabilization of an Origin Complex with Epstein-Barr Nuclear Antigen 1
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 88, pp. 10870-10874, December 1991 Biochemistry DNA looping between the origin of replication of Epstein-Barr virus and its enhancer site: Stabilization of an origin complex with Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 WEN SU*, TIM MIDDLETONt, BILL SUGDENt, AND HARRISON ECHOLS* *Division of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; and tMcArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53706 Contributed by Harrison Echols, September 5, 1991 ABSTRACT Epstein-Barr nuclear antigen 1 (EBNA-1) is transcriptional regulation, recent work has demonstrated the only viral protein required to support replication of Ep- association ofDNA-bound proteins between sites involved in stein-Barr virus during the latent phase of its life cycle. The enhancer function by the bacterial NtrC protein (15), the DNA segment required for latent replication, oriP, contains mammalian Spl protein (16, 17), the viral bovine papilloma two essential binding regions for EBNA-1, termed FR and DS, E2 protein (18), and the Spl and E2 proteins (19). Our work that are separated by 1 kilobase pair. The FR site appears to on EBNA-1 has been directed toward two questions: Does function as a replicational enhancer providing for the start of replicational enhancement involve the protein-protein asso- replication at the DS site. We have used electron microscopy to ciation ofDNA-bound EBNA-1? Why do enhancers typically visualize the interaction of EBNA-1 with its binding sites and act only from relatively close sites on the same DNA mole- to study the mechanism for communication between the FR and cule? DS sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Map of Bacteriophage Lambda
    MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Sept. 1978, p. 577-591 Vol.42, No. 3 0146-0749/78/0042-0577$02.00/0 Copyright © 1978 American Society for Microbiology Printed in U.S.A. Genetic Map of Bacteriophage Lambda HARRISON ECHOLS* AND HELIOS MURIALDO Department ofMolecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, * and Department of Medical Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto M5S 1A8, Canada INTRODUCTION .5..577 PHYSICAL STATES AND ACTIVITY OF THE A GENOME 577 GENETIC MAP OF THE A GENOME .577 ACTIITrY MAP OF THE A GENOME .583 COMMENTS ON GENETIC ORGANIZATION ...........5*583 LITERATURE CITED .584 INTRODUCTION that are the obligatory precursors for the The study of bacteriophage A has been a cen- cleaved, linear molecules packaged into a phage tral endeavor of molecular biology for a number head (Fig. 1). The lysogenic pathway involves a of years. Phage A has been the creature of choice repression of transcription and a site-specific for many investigators interested in deoxyribo- recombination event that inserts A DNA into nucleic acid (DNA) transcription, replication, the host Escherichia coli genome. This integra- and recombination, in nucleoprotein assembly, tive recombination between the phage and host and in the organization of these processes into attachment sites (att) generates a genetic struc- temporally regulated pathways. As a result of ture that is permuted from the linear order this intensive study, a great deal of information found in the phage particle because the phage is now available about A genes and how they attachment site (a a' or P P) is approximately work; however, the communication of this in the center of the mature DNA molecule (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyclical Return of the IQ Controversy: Revisiting the Lessons of the Resolution on Genetics, Race and Intelligence
    Journal of the History of Biology https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-021-09637-6 ORIGINAL RESEARCH The Cyclical Return of the IQ Controversy: Revisiting the Lessons of the Resolution on Genetics, Race and Intelligence Davide Serpico1 Accepted: 17 April 2021 © The Author(s) 2021 Abstract In 1976, the Genetics Society of America (GSA) published a document enti- tled “Resolution of Genetics, Race, and Intelligence.” This document laid out the Society’s position in the IQ controversy, particularly that on scientifc and ethical questions involving the genetics of intellectual diferences between human popula- tions. Since the GSA was the largest scientifc society of geneticists in the world, many expected the document to be of central importance in settling the controversy. Unfortunately, the Resolution had surprisingly little infuence on the discussion. In 1979, William Provine analyzed the possible factors that decreased the impact of the Resolution, among them scientists’ limited understanding of the relationship between science and ethics. Through the analysis of unpublished versions of the Resolution and exchanges between GSA members, I will suggest that the limited impact of the statement likely depended on a shift in the aims of the GSA due to the controversies that surrounded the preparation of the document. Indeed, the demands of the membership made it progressively more impartial in both scientifc and politi- cal terms, decreasing its potential signifcance for a wider audience. Notably, the troubled history of the Resolution raises the question of what can make efective or inefective the communication between scientists and the public—a question with resonance in past and present discussions on topics of social importance.
    [Show full text]
  • JOURNAL of VIROLOGY VOLUME 48 NUMBER 3 DECEMBER 1983 Edward M
    JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY VOLUME 48 NUMBER 3 DECEMBER 1983 Edward M. Scolnick, Editor in Chief (1987) Merck Sharp & Dolime Research Laboraitories Wes.t Point, Pa. David T. Denhardt, Editor (1987) Robert M. Krug, Editor (1987) University of Western Ontario Sloan-Kettering Institute London, Ontario, Canada New York, N.Y. Bernard N. Fields, Editor (1988) Michael B. A. Oldstone, Editor (1988) Harvard University, Medical School Sc ripps Clinic & Research Fouindation Boston, Mass. La Jolla, Calif. Harold S. Ginsberg, Editor (1984) Robert A. Weisberg, Editor (1988) Coluimbia University National Institlute of Child Health and Human Development New York, N.Y. Bethesda, Md. EDITORIAL BOARD David Baltimore (1984) Alice S. Huang (1984) Harriet Robinson (1985) Amiya K. Banerjee (1985) Tony Hunter (1983) William S. Robinson (1983) Andrew Becker (1985) Masayori Inouye (1985) Bernard Roizman (1985) Tamar Ben-Porat (1984) Robert Kamen (1985) Roland R. Rueckert (1985) Kenneth I. Berns (1985) Thomas J. Kelly, Jr. (1985) Norman P. Salzman (1984) David Botstein (1985) George Khoury (1984) Joseph Sambrook (1985) Dennis T. Brown (1984) Elliott Kieff (1984) Priscilla A. Schaffer (1984) Ahmad I. Bukhari (1984) Jonathan A. King (1984) Sondra Schlesinger (1983) Barrie J. Carter (1984) Daniel Kolakofsky (1983) June R. Scott (1983) Purnell Choppin (1983) Robert Lamb (1985) Bart Sefton (1985) John M. Coffin (1983) Robert A. Lazzarini (1984) Phillip A. Sharp (1985) Geoffrey M. Cooper (1984) Myron Levine (1985) Thomas E. Shenk (1984) Walter Doerfler (1983) Douglas R. Lowy (1983) Charles J. Sherr (1984) Harrison Echols (1984) Robert Martin (1984) Saul J. Silverstein (1985) Elvera Ehrenfeld (1983) George Miller (1984) Lee D. Simon (1984) Robert N.
    [Show full text]
  • Of DNA Polymerase III: a Possible Mechanism for SOS-Induced Targeted Mutagenesis (Fidelity of DNA Replication/Lexa Cleavage) CHI Lu, RICHARD H
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 83, pp. 619-623, February 1986 Biochemistry Capacity of RecA protein to bind preferentially to UV lesions and inhibit the editing subunit (e) of DNA polymerase III: A possible mechanism for SOS-induced targeted mutagenesis (fidelity of DNA replication/LexA cleavage) CHI Lu, RICHARD H. SCHEUERMANN, AND HARRISON ECHOLS Department of Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 Communicated by Allan Campbell, September 23, 1985 ABSTRACT The RecA protein of Escherichia coli is re- From the preceding summary, targeted mutagenesis re- quired for SOS-induced mutagenesis in addition to its quires two SOS-induced events: localization of the site (e.g., recombinational and regulatory roles. Most SOS-induced mu- pyrimidine dimer for UV) and a mechanism for replication tations probably occur during replication across a DNA lesion errors at that site. One suggested error mechanism is an (targeted mutagenesis). We have suggested previously that inhibition of the editing capacity (3' -- 5' exonuclease) of the RecA might participate in targeted mutagenesis by binding replicating DNA polymerase, allowing replication past the preferentially to the site of the DNA damage (e.g., pyrimidine dimer with random base insertion (16). A modification ofthis dimer) because of its partially unwound character; DNA proposal, specialized to RecA, is that RecA recognizes the polymerase Ill (poiHI) will then encounter RecA-coated DNA DNA lesion and locally modifies the DNA polymerase III at the lesion and might replicate across the damaged site with (polIII) holoenzyme at the dimer site to a reduced fidelity reduced fidelity. In this report, we analyze at a biochemical form; the enzyme then replicates through the dimer site, level two major predictions ofthis model.
    [Show full text]
  • Activity of the Purified Mutagenesis Proteins Umuc, Umud
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 89, pp. 10777-10781, November 1992 Biochemistry Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III (SOS respon/fdelity of DNA repfcatlon/umutatlo) MALINI RAJAGOPALANt, CHI Lut, ROGER WOODGATEtt, MIKE O'DONNELL§, MYRON F. GOODMAN$, AND HARRISON ECHOLSt tDivision of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720; 1Department of Microbiology, Cornell University Medical College, New York, NY 10021; and IDepartment of Biological Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 Contributed by Harrison Echols, August 17, 1992 ABSTRACT The introduction of a replication-inhibiting SOS mutagenesis (C. Bonner, S. Creighton and M.F.G., lesion Into the DNA ofEscherichia colU generates the Induced, unpublished work). multigene SOS response. One component of the SOS response Together, the studies noted above give clear indications is a marked increase in mutation rate, de t on RecA that SOS mutagenesis is a consequence ofreplicative bypass protein and the induced muta p us UmuC and of DNA lesions mediated by a damage-localized nucleopro- UmuD. A variety of previous indirect ap es have Indi- tein complex involving RecA, UmuC-UmuD', and pol III-a cated that SOS mutagenesi results from replicative bypass of "mutasome" (14, 17). However, direct evidence for such a the DNA lesion by DNA polymerase (pol ) me in pathway has been lacking in the absence of a defined bio- a reaction mediated by RecA, UmuC, and a prcsd form of chemical system. In the work reported here, we have used UmuD termed UmuD'.
    [Show full text]