Ensuring Reliability

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ensuring Reliability CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT EPORT R ENSURING SIBILITY SIBILITY N ESPO R RELIABILITY OCIAL OCIAL S ORPORATE ORPORATE C NORILSK NICKEL GROUP’S [ 2015 ] ] 2015 GROUP’S [ NICKEL NORILSK 2015 [ 2015 ] CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY REPORT INSPIRING TRUST 2 [ 2015 ] CORPORATE SOCIAL ReSPONSIBILITY 04 14 26 36 RePORT Statement About Priorities Responsible 48 Anti-money laundering and of the President, the Norilsk and objectives operations counter-terrorist Chairman Nickel Group financing initiatives of the Management 28 The Company’s development 38 Sustainability 49 Corporate Trust Service Board strategy management 34 Overview of performance 38 Corporate 50 Transparency TS across CSR focus areas governance N 51 Product TE responsibility CONTENTS 42 Remuneration N O C 43 Risk management 53 Research 06 22 and development framework 46 Corporate security 54 Economic Results and th performance The 80 47 Preventing and EPORT EPORT R highlights 2015 anniversary fighting corruption of Norilsk Nickel IBILITY IBILITY S PON S E R IAL IAL C 56 70 80 98 122 126 CORPORATE SO CORPORATE Effective Safety Environment Community Awards Appendices ] relationships and accolades 2015 [ 58 Stakeholders and interaction 72 Occupational health 82 Environmental 100 Employees 126 Appendix 1. mechanisms and safety management system and social policy Content Index for “In Accordance” with GRI G4 Guidelines, RSPP Reference Performance Indicators and ISO 26000 58 Dialogue with employees 78 Improvement of social 84 Expenditures 111 Development S 123 and working conditions on environmental protection of local communities 132 Appendix 2. 61 Dialogue with shareholders Identified Material Aspects and Boundaries (GRI G4) and investors 84 Environmental performance 120 Transport accessibility About the report 134 Appendix 3. KEL GROUP’ 62 Dialogue with business partners 89 Biodiversity conservation GRI G4 Specific Standard Disclosure C I N 64 Dialogue with authorities, 92 Impacts from transport K 140 Appendix 4. S communities and non-profit and logistics operations List of Abbreviations organisations ORIL 93 Impacts from foreign N 142 Appendix 5. 67 Environmental operations Glossary dialogue 152 94 Energy conservation 144 Appendix 6. 67 Supply chain and efficiency Opinion of the Russian Union of Industrialists responsibility Contacts and Entrepreneurs’ Council for Non-Financial Reporting 150 Appendix 7. Independent auditor conclusion 4 Statement D BOAR T of the President, Chairman N , , E T M N E E G D A of the Management Board N A PRESI M E E H H T T F F F O O T N N In its anniversary year, Norilsk Nickel once again to a sustainable urban environment. The obsolete Nickel A E M M confirmed its leadership both in the domestic Plant, a major source of air pollution in Norilsk, is not AIR and international markets despite the turbulent included into the upgrade programme and being shut H STATE C macroeconomic environment. down as scheduled. In 2015, the Company developed and approved a roadmap to reduce air pollutant This largely results from the new development strategy emissions at MMC Norilsk Nickel’s Polar Division up we have been implementing since 2013: it has geared to 2020. The initiative seeks to dispose of elemental EPORT EPORT the Company up to face the industry crisis and deliver sulphur at the Nadezhda Metallurgical Plant and R a strong performance. Norilsk Nickel has boasted robust the Copper Plant. returns and exceptionally high dividend yields all along IBILITY IBILITY S with maintaining one of the lowest leverage ratios in In 2015, the key companies of the Norilsk Nickel Group the industry. The Company remains committed to its tax, and their employees extended the Collective Bargaining PON S E social and environmental responsibilities and delivers all Agreement maintaining all the existing social R investment projects as per the approved schedule and commitments and introducing a number of additional IAL IAL C budget. The Company’s stable performance gave rise staff benefits. The Company pays special attention to to Norilsk Nickel’s tax contributions to the budget at all staff training, further improvements in health and safety levels and ensured funding of environmental initiatives culture and implementation of the highest safety and charitable programmes. New approaches to standards. Complete elimination of fatalities remains employee performance management have paved the Company’s top strategic priority. CORPORATE SO CORPORATE the way for rises in the average salary even against the backdrop of economic challenges. The key message of Norilsk Nickel’s 80th anniversary ] year was Creating the Future Together. The events of I would like to reiterate that all this has been achieved the past year served as a proof of this concept, since the 2015 [ through the consistent application of the strategy’s Company’s projects implemented in 2015 are crucial for fundamental principles, including focus on Tier 1 assets, the future of Norilsk Nickel, its employees, people of greater responsibility for the capital and investment Russian towns and cities and Russia as a whole. S returns, optimisation of the value chain and a decisive drive to cut operating costs. Norilsk Nickel remains involved in a number of public- KEL GROUP’ C I private partnership programmes. The Company VLadimir POtanin N K sponsors significant cultural, social and sports PRESIDEnt, CHairman S events across its footprint and seeks to contribute OF THE ManagEMEnt BOard ORIL N 6 Results and highlights 2015 Ni Сu Pd Pt 506.1 456.0 384.5 2012 300 364 2,731 683 366.2 2015 RESULTS AND HIGHLIGHTS 277.0 238.0 2013 285 371 2,661 651 186.5 159.0 EPORT EPORT R 93.4 104.1 2014 274 368 2,749 657 67.4 IBILITY IBILITY S 23.5 PON S E R 2015 266 369 2,689 656 2012 2013 2014 2015 IAL IAL C [G4-8] REVENUE GROSS PROFIT NET PROFIT ‘000 T ‘000 T ‘000 OZ T ‘000 OZ T RUB BN RUB BN RUB BN CORPORATE SO CORPORATE 247.3 ] 277.0 218.2 2015 50 506.1 48 974.5 99.8 [ 238.0 456.0 40 159.9 384.5 154.2 77.8 366.2 186.5 153.3 37 739.8 S 637.0 159.0 133.6 614.7 60.8 55.3 98.4 KEL GROUP’ C I N 31.0 K S ORIL N 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 REVENUE GROSS PROFIT EBITDA EBITDA DIVIDENDS ASSETS TOTAL CAPEX RUB BN RUB BN RUB BN MARGIN PAID RUB BN RUB BN % RUB BN 8 DIRECT ECONOMIC VALUE THE COMPANY’S POSITION IN THE INDUSTRY [G4-3, G4-4, G4-8] GENERATED AND DISTRIBUTED1 [G4-EC1] 521.2 st PLACE st PLACE rd PLACE th PLACE th PLACE th PLACE 470.8 384.9 1 1 3 4 4 12 367.8 NICKEL PALLADIUM COBALT RHODIUM PLATINUM COPPER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER PRODUCER 14% 39% 6% 12% 11% 2% OF GLOBAL OF GLOBAL OF GLOBAL OF GLOBAL OF GLOBAL OF GLOBAL 169.5 OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT OUTPUT 158.0 2012 2013 2014 2015 3 2015 RESULTS AND HIGHLIGHTS 87.3 ENVIRONMENTAL INDICATORS DIRECT ECONOMIC 74.4 VALUE GENERATED 38.3 108.3 5.7 RUB BN 3.6 Indicator Unit 2012 2013 2014 2015 58.3 45.7 EPORT EPORT R 2012 2013 Area of disturbed lands as hа 12,513 12,518 13,322 13,313 at the end of the period4 [G4-MM1] IBILITY IBILITY 554.2 S 464.9 PON Energy consumption 5 S 414.4 175.7 TJ — 173,955 169,307 176,395 E by Norilsk Nickel Group [G4-EN3] R 334.7 IAL IAL 162.0 C Total water withdrawal [G4-EN8] mcm 1,319.5 1,348.0 1,417.8 1,421.3 104.5 87.4 Percentage of water reused >90% % 85.7 92.2 92.3 92.6 and recycled6 222.0 Hazard class 5 CORPORATE SO CORPORATE 165.2 waste 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total wastewater discharge mcm 146.5 146.2 145.6 140.5 (practically non-hazardous waste) ECONOMIC VALUE 2.7 7.0 ] as percentage of total waste 47.6 45.0 DISTRIBUTED 2015 [ RUB BN 2014 2015 23.6 43.5 2.10 2.10 2.09 40.5 2.06 19.4 OPERATING EXPENSES 19.0 S 35.1 18.1 PAYROLL AND OTHER EMPLOYEE 33.6 50.2 REMUNERATION AND BENEFITS PAYMENTS TO PROVIDERS OF CAPITAL KEL GROUP’ C (INTEREST, DIVIDENDS) I N 5.9 K -46.5 -32.9 COMMUNITY INVESTMENTS S AND CHARITY2 ORIL GROSS TAX PAYMENTS N 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 2012 2013 2014 2015 ECONOMIC VALUE TOTAL WEIGHT TOTAL ENVIRONMENTAL RETAINED OF PRODUCTION POLLUTANT EXPENSES AND RUB BN WASTE [G4-EN23] EMISSIONS [G4-EN21] INVESTMENTS [G4-EN31] MT MT RUB BN 3 For Russian operations. 1 The data were calculated on an accrual basis under the IFRS using an in-house methodology developed in line with GRI G4 Guidelines. 4 The 2012–2014 data were adjusted to include Bystrinskoye Mining Company. 2 The calculations do not include CAPEX. 5 No aggregate value was calculated under the GRI G4 Guidelines. 6 Ratio of water recycled and reused to the total volume of water withdrawn for production and domestic needs. 10 SOCIAL INDICATORS Highlights 2015 84.1 85.0 85.6 83.6 84.3 86.3 81.9 82.0 83.0 79.9 83.6 81.6 84.0 82.0 82.3 83.3 Q1 • Norilsk Nickel became • Norilsk and Monchegorsk the general partner of hosted the Arctic Wave • The Company piloted the Science Festival, a key festival of R&D discoveries Stage 1 of Talnakh science promotion event sponsored by the Company.
Recommended publications
  • Russian Arctic 6/2019 15
    Russian Arctic 6/2019 DOI: 10.24411/2658-4255-2019-10063 ADULT INCIDENCE IN THE RUSSIAN EUROPEAN ARCTIC WITH DEVELOPED MINING AND METALLURGICAL INDUSTRY A. N. Nikanov, V.M. Dorofeev, L.V. Talykova, N.V. Sturlis, I.V. Gushin Kola Research Laboratory for Occupational Health, Kirovsk, Murmansk region, Russia [email protected] The purpose of the research. The research aims to assess the adult incidence within the mining complex in the Murmansk Region (the Russian Arctic). Materials and methods. The analysis of the adult incidence change in 1989- 1990, 1999-2000, 2009-2010 and 2014-2015 was carried out. To assess the population health status, the incidence data was used in this work. The research covers the territory of the municipal formations with the city-forming mining and metallurgical complex (MMC) enterprises in the Murmansk Region. Main results and conclusions. It has been established that between 1989 and 2015 the adult incidence in the MMC territories, as well as in the Murmansk Region at large, clearly tends to increase (the coefficient of determination R2>0,7) for the following disease categories: neoplasms; endocrine diseases; diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs; diseases of the nervous system and sense organs; diseases of the circulatory system; diseases of the genitourinary system; diseases of the musculoskeletal system and connective tissue; congenital malformations. There is no doubt that a set of climatic, geographical and production factors, along with the pollution of the natural environment within the MMC territories in the Murmansk Region, has a negative impact on the health status of the adult population, including working individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1
    RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 1 No. 33 Summer 2003 Special issue: The Transformation of Protected Areas in Russia A Ten-Year Review PROMOTING BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN RUSSIA AND THROUGHOUT NORTHERN EURASIA RCN #33 21/8/03 13:57 Page 2 CONTENTS CONTENTS Voice from the Wild (Letter from the Editors)......................................1 Ten Years of Teaching and Learning in Bolshaya Kokshaga Zapovednik ...............................................................24 BY WAY OF AN INTRODUCTION The Formation of Regional Associations A Brief History of Modern Russian Nature Reserves..........................2 of Protected Areas........................................................................................................27 A Glossary of Russian Protected Areas...........................................................3 The Growth of Regional Nature Protection: A Case Study from the Orlovskaya Oblast ..............................................29 THE PAST TEN YEARS: Making Friends beyond Boundaries.............................................................30 TRENDS AND CASE STUDIES A Spotlight on Kerzhensky Zapovednik...................................................32 Geographic Development ........................................................................................5 Ecotourism in Protected Areas: Problems and Possibilities......34 Legal Developments in Nature Protection.................................................7 A LOOK TO THE FUTURE Financing Zapovedniks ...........................................................................................10
    [Show full text]
  • The Affirmative Aphasia of Tarkovsky's Mirror
    „ Я [не] могу говорить”: The affirmative aphasia of Tarkovsky’s Mirror Emma Zofia Zachurski Mine is not a pleasant story, it does not possess the gentle harmony of invented tales; like the lives of all men who have given up trying to deceive themselves, it is a mixture of nonsense, madness and dreams… Taken from the opening of Hermann Hesse’s novel Demian: The Story of Emil Sinclair’s Youth (1919), Andrei Tarkovsky encounters this passage in 19821 and retroactively calls it the epigraph to his 1975 film Зеркало (Mirror). Hesse’s ‘mixture’ is only too relevant to the content of Mirror. Tarkovsky’s own return to the past refuses ‘gentle harmony’ as it unfolds in a non-linear assemblage of dreamlike mise-en- scène, stark historical documentary footage, lyrical readings of poetry by the filmmaker’s father Arseny Tarkovsky and a disorienting casting of actors and the filmmaker’s family members in multiple roles. However, neither the Hesse passage nor the Tarkovsky film are only interested in content. They both also share a sensitivity to form, to their language– the nonsense through which they make sense. In text this may be the nonsense of written language standing in for the sensations of the tactile, the aural and the visual that define the events of the past. Offering no more than paper and pen for these sensory experiences, text becomes ‘non-sense’ indeed. Tarkovsky, however, is not limited to text. He has access to the senses, his camera can directly record sound and vision. If Tarkovsky has access to the senses, though, does he also have access to sense? Tarkovsky offers a response: “In general, I view words as noise made by man”2.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Science Fiction Movies in the Mirror of Film Criticism and Viewers’ Opinions
    Alexander Fedorov Soviet science fiction movies in the mirror of film criticism and viewers’ opinions Moscow, 2021 Fedorov A.V. Soviet science fiction movies in the mirror of film criticism and viewers’ opinions. Moscow: Information for all, 2021. 162 p. The monograph provides a wide panorama of the opinions of film critics and viewers about Soviet movies of the fantastic genre of different years. For university students, graduate students, teachers, teachers, a wide audience interested in science fiction. Reviewer: Professor M.P. Tselysh. © Alexander Fedorov, 2021. 1 Table of Contents Introduction …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………3 1. Soviet science fiction in the mirror of the opinions of film critics and viewers ………………………… 4 2. "The Mystery of Two Oceans": a novel and its adaptation ………………………………………………….. 117 3. "Amphibian Man": a novel and its adaptation ………………………………………………………………….. 122 3. "Hyperboloid of Engineer Garin": a novel and its adaptation …………………………………………….. 126 4. Soviet science fiction at the turn of the 1950s — 1960s and its American screen transformations……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 130 Conclusion …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 136 Filmography (Soviet fiction Sc-Fi films: 1919—1991) ……………………………………………………………. 138 About the author …………………………………………………………………………………………………………….. 150 References……………………………………………………………….……………………………………………………….. 155 2 Introduction This monograph attempts to provide a broad panorama of Soviet science fiction films (including television ones) in the mirror of
    [Show full text]
  • Barents-Predators-Seminar-Draft
    Draft February 27th PROGRAM of International Seminar «Migration of Wild Predators near Populated Areas in the Barents Euro-Arctic Region» Wednesday, March 4, 2020 During Arrival of participants to the airport of Arkhangelsk. the day Transfer from the airport to «Novotel» hotel (Severnaya Dvina Emb., 55, ph.: +7 (8182) 22-99-88; self-service check-in at: accorhotels.com/9764) (local transport is provided by the host side) 19:00 – 21:00 Dinner at «Novotel» hotel (organised by the host side for non-resident participants) Thursday, March 5, 2020 09:20 – 09:40 Transfer from «Novotel» hotel to Arkhangelsk Region Government building (Conference room, Troitsky ave., 49/1) 09:40 – 10:00 Registration of participants, welcoming coffee 10:00 – 10:30 Official opening of the Seminar. Moderator: Mr. Tomas Hallberg, Head of the International Barents Secretariat (Kirkenes, Norway) Opening speeches: 1) Igor Orlov, Arkhangelsk Region Governor; 2) Magdalena Andersson, Governor of Västerbotten County, Sweden; 3) Nikolay Morgunov, Director, «Federal Centre of Hunting Industry Development» 10:30 – 11:30 Presentation of reports. Part 1. (speech time limit – up to 10 minutes). Moderator: tbc 1) Alexander Erulik, Minister of Natural Resources and Timber- Industry Complex of Arkhangelsk Region. Introductory report: «Information on Wild Predators Migration in Arkhangelsk Region» 2 2) Nikolay Morgunov, Director, «Federal Centre of Hunting Industry Development». Theme: tbc 3) Anatoly Pavlov, Head of State Supervision and Control Unit, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environmental Protection of the Republic of Komi. Theme: «The Situation in the Republic of Komi on Wild Predators Migration Led to Their Presence in Populated Areas»; 4) Roman Mazurets, Head of Department for Protection, Control and Regulation of Wildlife Exploitation of Vologda Region.
    [Show full text]
  • As of September 30, 2020
    LIST OF AFFILIATES Sberbank of Russia (full corporate name of the joint stock company) Issuer code: 0 1 4 8 1 – V as 3 0 0 9 2 0 2 0 of (indicate the date on which the list of affiliates of the joint stock company was compiled) Address of the issuer: 117997, Moscow, 19 Vavilova St. (address of the issuer – the joint stock company – indicated in the Unified State Register of Legal Entities where a body or a representative of the joint stock company is located) Information contained in this list of affiliates is subject to disclosure pursuant to the laws of the Russian Federation on securities. Website: http://www.sberbank.com; http://www.e-disclosure.ru/portal/company.aspx?id=3043 (the website used by the issuer to disclose information) Managing Director, Head of the Corporate Secretary Service (under the Power of Attorney No. 887-В (887-Д) dated 16 September 2019) original signed O. O. Tsvetkov (position of the authorized individual of the joint stock company) (signature) (initials, surname) L.S. “ 06 ” October 20 20 the city of Issuer codes INN (Taxpayer Identificat ion Number) 7707083893 OGRN (Primary State Registrati on Number) 1027700132195 I. Affiliates as of 3 0 0 9 2 0 2 0 Item Full company name (or name for a Address of a legal entity or place of Grounds for recognizing the entity Date on which Interest of the affiliate Percentage of ordinary No. nonprofit entity) or full name (if any) of residence of an individual (to be as an affiliate the grounds in the charter capital of shares of the joint the affiliate indicated only with the consent of became valid the joint stock stock company owned the individual) company, % by the affiliate, % 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Theory& Practice
    GREATER OPPORTUNITIES. GREATER RESPONSIBILITY. / theory& practice Operational efficiency and sustainability, flexibil- ity and consistency, availability and professional- ism, versatility and competency in the areas of expertise… These are only a few key factors supporting success in the insurance business. The SOGAZ Group success story, as well as its rep- utation and positions in the Russian insurance market prove that the company is fully in position to meet those challenging requirements. SOGAZ meets expectations of its clients, shareholders and partners, thus creating for them an oasis of stability and confidence in the future. annual report for / for 2005 CONTENT ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL /// Pages Pages Pages / Board of Directors / About SOGAZ Group / Cooperation Chairman's Appeal with Gas Industry / SOGAZ Group Members Management Board Group's Business / JSC / Chairman's Appeal / SOGAZ Management Diversification Board Up-to-date Approaches JSC / / SOGAZ Management and Technologies Board / Social Activity / 2005 Key Events and Charities / Activities of SOGAZ Group in 2005 – Main Results theory&practice theory&practice of successful business of better decisions SOGAZ GROUP ANNUAL REPORT ANNUAL CHAIRMAN'S APPEAL MANAGEMENT BOARD MANAGEMENT BOARD OF DIRECTORS BOARD CHAIRMAN'S APPEAL AND / Greater Opportunities. Greater Responsibility. SOGAZ GROUP INSURANCE /// Pages Pages Pages JSC / SOGAZ Group / SOGAZ / Contact Information Regional Policy Financial Report / Representatives JSC JSC / Russian Insurance / SOGAZ Profit of SOGAZ Market Development
    [Show full text]
  • Media Culture Soviet Film Critics About Soviet Cinema: From
    Медиаобразование. Media Education. 2017. № 1 Media Culture Soviet film critics about Soviet cinema: from censorship to Gorbachev's perestroika Prof. Dr. Alexander Fedorov, Rostov State University of Economics, Russia E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Moscow publishing house Art began to produce in mid-1960s annual book collection Screen, which was to reflect the most important cinematic events in the USSR and the world. The first collection of this kind - Screen 1964 - was printed edition of 45,500 copies. The circulation of the next two collections were 30-35 thousand copies. From 1968 to 1985 the Screens were annually with a circulation of 50 thousand copies. Screen 1987 circulation has been increased to 75 thousand, but the rest of the collection issues have returned to the circulation of 50 thousand copies. Each book is illustrated with black-and-white frames of the movies and photos masters of the screen. Yearbooks Screen became a mirror of the Soviet criticism of the 1960s - 1980s, reflecting all ups and downs, forced to default figures, ideological passages, thaw and perestroika hope... From the time of the fisrt to last annual output has been a quarter century. Soviet film criticism changed significantly. The main materials for this article was articles of Soviet film critics about Soviet cinema in Screen yearbooks. The methods of theoretical research: classification, comparison, analogy, induction and deduction, abstraction and concretization, theoretical analysis and synthesis; methods of empirical research: collecting information related to the research subjects. Keywords: film critic, film studies, Soviet, USSR, film, movies, cinema, censorship. * Article was written as part of research with the financial support of the grant of the Russian Scientific Foundation (RNF).
    [Show full text]
  • Dear Friends! on Behalf of Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation I
    ƒÓÓ„Ë ‰ÛÁ¸ˇ! Dear friends! ŒÚ ËÏÂÌË ÃËÌËÒÚÂÒÚ‚‡ ÍÛθÚÛ˚ –ÓÒÒËÈÒÍÓÈ On behalf of Ministry of Culture of the Russian ‘‰‡ˆËË ÔÓÁ‰‡‚Ρ˛ ‚‡Ò Ò Ì‡˜‡ÎÓÏ ‡·ÓÚ˚ Federation I would like to congratulate you all on 19-„Ó ŒÚÍ˚ÚÓ„Ó ÓÒÒËÈÒÍÓ„Ó ÍËÌÓÙÂÒÚË‚‡Îˇ the opening of the 19-th Open Russian Film "üËÌÓÚ‡‚". Festival "Kinotavr". ‘ÂÒÚË‚‡Î¸ ‚ —Ó˜Ë ‚Ò„‰‡ ·˚Î Ò‡Ï˚Ï ˇÍËÏ, The Festival in Sochi has always been the most Ò‡Ï˚Ï ÓÊˉ‡ÂÏ˚Ï, Ò‡Ï˚Ï Î˛·ËÏ˚Ï vivid, most anticipated, most admired and most Ô‡Á‰ÌËÍÓÏ Ë ÒÓ·˚ÚËÂÏ Ì‡ˆËÓ̇θÌÓ„Ó ÍËÌÓ. celebrated event for national cinema. But it is Œ‰Ì‡ÍÓ ËÏÂÌÌÓ ÚÂÔ¸, ̇ ‚ÓÎÌ ‡Òˆ‚ÂÚ‡ only now when domestic film industry is ÓÚ˜ÂÒÚ‚ÂÌÌÓ„Ó ÍËÌÓËÒÍÛÒÒÚ‚‡, "üËÌÓÚ‡‚" blooming, "Kinotavr" has become the main ÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ËÚÒˇ „·‚ÌÓÈ ÔÓÙÂÒÒËÓ̇θÌÓÈ professional platform for the first-night showings, Ô·ÚÙÓÏÓÈ ‰Îˇ ÔÂϸÂÌ˚ı ÔÓÒÏÓÚÓ‚, meetings and discussions for all creative ‚ÒÚ˜ Ë ‰ËÒÍÛÒÒËÈ ‚ÒÂı Ú‚Ó˜ÂÒÍËı ÔÓÍÓÎÂÌËÈ generations of Russian cinematographers. ÓÒÒËÈÒÍËı ÍËÌÂχÚÓ„‡ÙËÒÚÓ‚. Participation in festival's programme is already an ”˜‡ÒÚË ‚ ÍÓÌÍÛÒÌÓÈ ÔÓ„‡ÏÏ "üËÌÓÚ‡‚‡" achievement, already success for every creative Ò‡ÏÓ ÔÓ Ò· ˇ‚ΡÂÚÒˇ ÛÒÔÂıÓÏ ‰Îˇ ÒÓÁ‰‡ÚÂÎÂÈ person in our film industry. To win at "Kinotavr" ͇ʉÓÈ ËÁ ‚˚·‡ÌÌ˚ı ÎÂÌÚ. œÓ·Â‰‡ ̇ beyond doubt means to receive the best ever proof "üËÌÓÚ‡‚Â" ÒÚ‡ÌÓ‚ËÚÒˇ ·ÂÒÒÔÓÌ˚Ï of innovation and craftsmanship and excellence.
    [Show full text]
  • Soviet Cinema of the Sixties
    W&M ScholarWorks Arts & Sciences Articles Arts and Sciences 2018 The Unknown New Wave: Soviet Cinema of the Sixties Alexander V. Prokhorov College of William & Mary, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/aspubs Part of the Modern Languages Commons, and the Slavic Languages and Societies Commons Recommended Citation Prokhorov, Alexander V., The Unknown New Wave: Soviet Cinema of the Sixties (2018). Cinema of the Thaw retrospective. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/aspubs/873 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Arts and Sciences at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Arts & Sciences Articles by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 2 22 de mai a 3 de jun CINEMA 1 e A CAIXA é uma empresa pública brasileira que prima pelo respeito à diversidade, e mantém comitês internos atuantes para promover entre os seus empregados campanhas, programas e ações voltados para disseminar ideias, conhecimentos e atitudes de respeito e tolerância à diversidade de gênero, raça, orientação sexual e todas as demais diferenças que caracterizam a sociedade. A CAIXA também é uma das principais patrocinadoras da cultura brasileira, e destina, anualmente, mais de R$ 80 milhões de seu orçamento para patrocínio a projetos nas suas unidades da CAIXA Cultural além de outros espaços, com ênfase para exposições, peças de teatro, espetáculos de dança, shows, cinema, festivais de teatro e dança e artesanato brasileiro. Os projetos patrocinados são selecionados via edital público, uma opção da CAIXA para tornar mais democrática e acessível a participação de produtores e artistas de todo o país.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinematic Taganrog
    Alexander Fedorov Cinematic Taganrog Moscow, 2021 Fedorov A.V. Cinematic Taganrog. Moscow: "Information for all", 2021. 100 p. The book provides a brief overview of full–length feature films and TV series filmed in Taganrog (taking into account the opinions of film critics and viewers), provides a list of actors, directors, cameramen, screenwriters, composers and film experts who were born, studied and / or worked in Taganrog. Reviewer: Professor M.P. Tselysh. © Alexander Fedorov, 2021. 2 Table of contents Introduction ……………………………………………………………………………………… 4 Movies filmed in Taganrog and its environs ………………………………………….. 5 Cinematic Taganrog: Who is Who…………………………….…………………………. 69 Anton Barsukov: “How I was filming with Nikita Mikhalkov, Victor Merezhko and Andrey Proshkin.………………………………………………… 77 Filmography (movies, which filmed in Taganrog and its surroundings)…… 86 About the Author……………………………………………………………………………….. 92 References ………………………………………………………………………………………… 97 3 Introduction What movies were filmed in Taganrog? How did the press and viewers evaluate and rate these films? What actors, directors, cameramen, screenwriters, film composers, film critics were born and / or studied in this city? In this book, for the first time, an attempt is made to give a wide panorama of nearly forty Soviet and Russian movies and TV series filmed in Taganrog and its environs, in the mirror of the opinions of film critics and viewers. Unfortunately, data are not available for all such films (therefore, the book, for example, does not include many documentaries). The book cites articles and reviews of Soviet and Russian film critics, audience reviews on the Internet portals "Kino –teater.ru" and "Kinopoisk". I also managed to collect data on over fifty actors, directors, screenwriters, cameramen, film composers, film critics, whose life was associated with Taganrog.
    [Show full text]
  • IF WE LOSE the ARCTIC Finland’S Arctic Thinking from the 1980S to Present Day
    IF WE LOSE THE ARCTIC Finland's Arctic thinking from the 1980s to present day ARKTINEN KESKUS Lapin yliopisto Markku Heikkilä ARCTIC CENTRE University of Lapland ARKTINEN KESKUS Lapin yliopisto ARCTIC CENTRE University of Lapland IF WE LOSE THE ARCTIC Finland's Arctic thinking from the 1980s to present day ARKTINEN KESKUS Lapin yliopisto Markku Heikkilä ARCTIC CENTRE University of Lapland Rovaniemi, 2019 ARKTINEN KESKUS Lapin yliopisto ARCTIC CENTRE University of Lapland Text © Markku Heikkilä Publisher The Arctic Centre, University of Lapland Layout Annika Hanhivaara English translation Jenny Hakala Printed in Popa, Rovaniemi 2019 ISBN 978-952-337-133-0 (Pb. English) ISBN 978-952-337-134-7 (pdf English) CONTENTS Prologue 4 PARTI I Arctic Visions 1998. The origins and background of Arctic cooperation 6 ”Strategic Reserve” for the Future of Europe 7 The Hopes and Realities of the Barents Region 13 Finland Brings the Northern Dimension to the European Union 22 From the Mediterranean Sea to the Baltic Sea and towards the North 27 Gorbachev's Speech Launches Arctic Cooperation 31 Canada Is Searching for Itself and the Arctic Council Is Born 36 Negotiations without Success 43 A Moral Obligation for Humanity 47 The Northern Indigenous Peoples Step Forth 52 Southern Pollution Hits North 60 Researchers Want to Influence Politics 63 From Military Security to Comprehensive Security 67 The Only Arctic Environmental Organisation 73 The Northern Parliaments Want In 76 Towards Transatlantic Economic Cooperation 80 PART II The Leading Arctic Actor.
    [Show full text]