Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project As the legally designated depository library for Massachusetts state publications and a selective depository library, the State Library has collected an extensive collection of documents and other publications relating to the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project. Many items are available in both paper and electronic format. Among the over 140 documents and other publications available are: Available Documents: Senate Committee on Post Audit and Oversight Big Dig - Cost Recovery Mass Room 500.1M3 P675 R63 2004 Massachusetts Department of Transportation [Metropolitan Highway System "Stem to Stern" Safety Review Final Close-out Report and Supporting Documents] Mass Room 620M3 M48 2008 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/36353 Web Resources on the Big Dig Massachusetts Office of the Attorney General Big Dig Management Consultant and Designers to Pay $450 Million (2008) Mass Room 340M3 B54 2008 http://www.mass.gov/ago/news-and-updates/press-releases/2008/big-dig-4582-million-global-agreement.html Massachusetts Office of the State Auditor Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project's Outstanding funding issue with Massachusetts Port Authority (2008) http://www.mass.gov/auditor/docs/audits/2008/200705103c2.pdf Central Artery / Third Harbor Tunnel Project (CA/T) Accounting for All Costs Related to Inspecting and Repairing Tunnel Walls and Ceilings (2007) http://www.mass.gov/auditor/docs/audits/2007/200705103c1.pdf Independent State Auditor's report on certain activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's Central Artery/ Third Harbor Tunnel Contract C22A1 (2005) http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35675 State Auditor's Cost Recovery Referral on Certain Activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project Waterproofing. Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 C4682 2004 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35674 Independent State Auditor's report on the activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's Central Artery/ Third Harbor Tunnel force accounts : January 1994 through November 2002. Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 C465 2003 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35677 Independent State Auditor's report on certain activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's Central Artery/ Third Harbor Tunnel - Force Accounts (2002) Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 T876 2002 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35673 Independent State Auditor's report on certain activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's Central Artery/ Third Harbor Tunnel management contingency : October 1, 2001 through March 31, 2002. Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 M3782 2002 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35678 Independent State Auditor's report on certain activities of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority's oversight over certain design and construction activities relating to the North/South Rail Link in Boston : November 1, 1989 through December 31, 2000. Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 M378 2001 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35679 Independent State Auditor's report on the activities of the Central Artery/ Third Harbor Tunnel Project Wrap-Up Insurance Program : November 1, 1992 through October 31, 1999. Mass Room 336.7M3 A91 C461 2000 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35676 Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General Maintenance & Inspection of Covered Roadways & Highway Decks, Letter to John Cogliano, Chairman, MA Turnpike Authority, April 2007 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/cat-air-rights.pdf Interim Review of the Partial Collapse of the Interstate 90 Ceiling & the Obligations of Various Commonwealth Entities to Inspect, Maintain, & Certify the Safety of the Tunnel, letter to Senator Steven Baddour & Representative Joseph Wagner, Oct 2006 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/bigdigcollapse.pdf An Analysis of Construction Projects within the Commonwealth: January 2000 to December 2004, Revision One, May 2006 Massachusetts Office of the Inspector General Mass Room 340.9M3 A632 2007 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35327 Surety Bonds and the Central/Artery Tunnel Project, letter to Chairman Matthew J. Amorello, September 2005 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35333 A Review of Big Dig Professional Liability Insurance Coverage, June 2005 Mass Room 340.9M3 L533 2005 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35331 A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Dewey Square Air Intake Structure, March 2005. http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35326 A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Waterproofing Mismanagement by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff in East Boston, March 2005. Mass Room 340.9M3 B548 2005 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35329 A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Paving Mismanagement by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff, January 2005. Mass Room 340.9M3 B5462 2005 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35328 A Big Dig Cost Recovery Proposal: Trench Drain Failures Led to Cost Increases November 2004. http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catrench.pdf Big Dig Water Leaks, letter to Chairman Matthew Amorello from Inspector General Gregory W. Sullivan and Auditor A. Joseph DeNucci http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35330 Investigation Leads to $146 Million Big Dig Lawsuit http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catcostr.pdf A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Poor Contract Oversight by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff May Have Led to Cost Increases Mass Room 340.9M3 B546 2004 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/costreco.pdf A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Contract Mismanagement by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff May Have Increased Big Dig Costs Mass Room 340.9M3 B545 2003 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catref.pdf Proposal to Pursue Big Dig Cost Recovery: Ceiling Installation in the Ted Williams Tunnel Mass Room 340.9M3 P766 2003 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catbolts2.pdf Analysis of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff's Reply to The Boston Globe's Investigative News Series Concerning the Big Dig Mass Room 340.9M3 A53 2003 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catglbrp.pdf A Recommendation for Cost Recovery Against the Big Dig's Management Consultant: Grout Heave-Related Contractor Claims on the C11A1 Contract Mass Room 340.9M3 B43 2003 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catgrout.pdf A History of Central Artery/Tunnel Project Finances 1994 - 2001: Report to the Treasurer of the Commonwealth Mass Room 340.9M3 C463 2001 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/history-central-artery- tunnel-project-finances-1994-2001-march-2001.html Proposal to Pursue Big Dig Cost Recovery: Ceiling Installation in the Ted Williams Tunnel Mass Room 340.9M3 P766 2003 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catbolts2.pdf A Review of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project Cost Recovery Program Mass Room 340.9M3 C46 2000 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/review-central-artery- tunnel-project-cost-recovery-program-dec-2000.html Central Artery/Tunnel Project : management issues and recommendations, 1993-2000 Mass Room 340.9M3 C48 2000 Statutorily Mandated Reviews of Central Artery/Tunnel Project Building Construction Contracts 1997-1999 Mass Room 340.9M3 S732 1999 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/catmatrt.pdf A Review of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project's Use of Anchor Bolts on the C05B1 Tunnel Finishes Contract Mass Room 340.9M3 R48 1998 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/35332 A Review of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project's Materials Testing Laboratory Function Mass Room 340M3 R475 1997 http://www.mass.gov/ig/publications/reports-and-recommendations/central-artery-big-dig/review-central-artery- tunnel-project-materials-testing-laboratory-function-dec-1997.html Oversight plan for the Central Artery/Third Harbor Tunnel Project Mass Room 500.1M3 P675 O93 1995 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/handle/2452/48819 National Transportation Safety Board Ceiling Collapse in the Interstate 90 Connector Tunnel, Boston, Massachusetts, July 10, 2006 (2007) HE5614.4 B7 U55 2007 http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2007/HAR0702.pdf United States Department of Transportation – Federal Highway Administration FHWA tunnel leak assessment Boston Central Artery interim report HE356.5.B6 F49 2005 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/reports/centralarterytunnel/index.htm Federal Task Force on the Boston Central Artery Tunnel Project Review of Project Oversight and Costs, March 31, 2000 HE356.5.B7 U56 2000 http://archives.lib.state.ma.us/bitstream/handle/2452/114378 Metropolitan Transportation Management Center, a Case Study: Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Integrated Project Control System, Responding to Incidents Rapidly and Effectively, October, 1999 http://tmcpfs.ops.fhwa.dot.gov/cfprojects/uploaded_files/11063.pdf United States Department of Transportation - Office of the Inspector General The Commonwealth of Massachusetts' Safety Review of the Central Artery/Tunnel Project was
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Presented By
    Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council presented by Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Patricia Leavenworth, P.E., Chair November 2017 Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Executive Summary MassDOT’s progress in implementing asset management is keeping Massachusetts apace with Federal requirements. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have implemented final transportation asset management (TAM) rules in 2017 that impact how MassDOT measures and communicates the condition of its assets. Transportation Asset Management Plans FHWA and FTA rules require the Highway Division, the MBTA, the Rail and Transit Division, and each RTA to complete a transportation asset management plan (TAMP for Highway, TAM Plan for transit). The status on these plans is as follows: Highway | Will be submitted to FHWA in April, 2018. MBTA | Will be submitted to FTA by October, 2018. Rail | A consultant has been retained for delivery of an asset management plan for rail by February, 2018. This plan is not required by any Federal rule, but MassDOT is pursuing it to improve asset management at the agency. Transit | MassDOT is making progress toward submitting the TAM Plan for MassDOT’s in-house transit assets and those of its Federal Aid sub-recipients to FTA by October, 2018. RTAs | Each RTA is at a different stage in the development of their asset management plans, due to the FTA by October, 2018. MassDOT is ready to assist if asked. Performance and Condition Key performance and asset management findings of this report are summarized below by asset type and division.
    [Show full text]
  • Tolling and Transponders in Massachusetts
    DRIVING INNOVATION: TOLLING AND TRANSPONDERS IN MASSACHUSETTS By Wendy Murphy and Scott Haller White Paper No. 150 July 2016 Pioneer Institute for Public Policy Research Pioneer’s Mission Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government. This paper is a publication of the Center for Better Government, which seeks limited, accountable government by promoting competitive delivery of public services, elimination of unnecessary regulation, and a focus on core government functions. Current initiatives promote reform of how the state builds, manages, repairs and finances its transportation assets as well as public employee benefit reform. The Center for School Reform seeks to increase the education options available to parents and students, drive system-wide reform, and ensure accountability in public education. The Center’s work builds on Pioneer’s legacy as a recognized leader in the charter public school movement, and as a champion of greater academic rigor in Massachusetts’ elementary and secondary schools. Current initiatives promote choice and competition, school-based man- agement, and enhanced academic performance in public schools. The Center for Economic Opportunity seeks to keep Massachusetts competitive by pro- moting a healthy business climate, transparent regulation, small business creation in urban areas and sound environmental and development policy. Current initiatives promote market reforms to increase the supply of affordable housing, reduce the cost of doing business, and revitalize urban areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1282 57 Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project BRIAN R. BRENNER Some new computer applications are being developed for and Roule IA applied to the construction planning and traffic studies associated with the design of the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel in Boston. This project is one of the most massive and complex urban highway projects in the country. It features an immersed­ tube harbor tunnel, depression of the downtown expressway in a cut-and-cover tunnel without interrupting service on the existing overhead viaduct, major new or revised urban interchanges, and long-span river crossings. The construction site, with its old exist­ ing and historic buildings and subways, permits limited clear­ ances, posing formidable challenges to engineers planning the work. The computer applications described include computerized composite mapping for archeological planning; analysis of mul­ tilevel curved-girder viaducts; transportation forecasting using highway network models; planning associated with the construc­ tion of the depressed Central Artery tunnels; and computer-aided 1-90 planning and mitigation measures for underpinning, protection of a subway tube, and other construction problems. The Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel (CA/THT) SOUTH BOSTON project is a massive urban highway improvement job being planned and designed in Boston. A key map is shown in Figure 1. The work features the addition of a third harbor tunnel, a •••• • • • • Artery/Tunnel Project new immersed tube tunnel that will cross Boston Harbor and extend I-90 to Logan Airport and Route lA. The six-lane FIGURE 1 Key map, CA/THT project.
    [Show full text]
  • Southbay Report.Qxd
    August 30, 2004 Mr. Mark Maloney Director of the Boston Redevelopment Authority City of Boston 9th Floor City Hall Plaza Boston, Massachusetts Dear Mr. Maloney- On behalf of the South Bay Planning Study Task Force, I am pleased to present to you the South Bay Planning Study - Phase One. Over the past seven months our group of seventeen devoted volunteers, including representatives from Chinatown and the Leather District, have worked to create a plan for this important new part of the City of Boston. The vision that has emerged from our efforts is exciting and broad-reaching, and at the same time identifies many issues that will require further study in the second phase of our work. Conclusions that we have reached include: The project should be expanded from a set of parcels totaling 10 acres to a District consisting of 20 acres, transforming it from a project to a neighborhood. The district, which currently consists of highway infrastructure that divides and separates it from the neighborhoods, should become a series of city blocks that knit together and connect many important assets of the City of Boston. The southern entrance into the City that is now dominated by transportation infrastructure should instead be revealed as a great gateway portal for the City from the South. We must collectively work towards providing housing for all income levels and towards providing employment and employment training to benefit the adjacent neighborhoods. We should create a terminus to the Rose Kennedy Greenway in the form of a signature park that will help to meet the recreational needs of the neighborhoods and connect the Greenway to Fort Point Channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dig Benefit: a Quicker Downtown Trip Turnpike Authority Report Cites Business Gain
    Big Dig benefit: A quicker downtown trip Turnpike Authority report cites business gain By Mac Daniel February 15, 2006 The $14.6-billion Big Dig project has cut the average trip through the center of Boston from 19.5 minutes to 2.8 minutes and has increased by 800,000 the number of people in Eastern Massachusetts who can now get to Logan International Airport in 40 minutes or less, according to a report that is scheduled to be released today. The report is the first to analyze and link the drive- time benefits of the project to its economic impact since the Big Dig built its final onramp last month. The report relies on data obtained since milestones were completed in 2003, such as opening of the Ted Williams Tunnel to all traffic and opening of the northbound and southbound Interstate 93 tunnels. Officials at the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which manages the project, released the executive summary portion of the report to the Globe yesterday. The improved drive times are projected to result in savings of $167 million annually: $24 million in vehicle operating costs and $143 million in time. The report estimates that the Big Dig will generate $7 billion in private investment and will create tens of the thousands of jobs in the South Boston waterfront area and along the I-93 corridor. The report was authored by the Economic Development Research Group, Inc., a Boston-based consulting firm, at the behest of the Massachusetts Turnpike Authority, which paid about $100,000 for the research, much of which was gathered from agencies such as the Boston Redevelopment Authority and the Boston Metropolitan Planning Organization, officials said.
    [Show full text]
  • America's Tunnels / by Marcia Amidon Lusted
    Infrastructure of AMERICA’S Tunnels Marcia Amidon Lusted 2001 SW 31st Avenue Hallandale, FL 33009 www.mitchelllane.com Copyright © 2018 by Mitchell Lane Publishers. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced without written permission from the publisher. Printed and bound in the United States of America. Printing 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Design: Sharon Beck Editor: Jim Whiting Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: Lusted, Marcia Amidon, author. Title: Infrastructure of America's tunnels / by Marcia Amidon Lusted. Description: Hallandale, FL : Mitchell Lane Publishers, [2018] | Series: Engineering feats | Includes bibliographical references and index. | Audience: Ages 9-13. Identifiers: LCCN 2017052245 | ISBN 9781680201505 (library bound) Subjects: LCSH: Tunnels—United States—Juvenile literature. | Infrastructure (Economics)—United States—Juvenile literature. Classification: LCC TA804.U6 L87 2018 | DDC 624.1/930973—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2017052245 eBook ISBN: 9-781-6802-0151-2 PHOTO CREDITS: Cover, p. 1—Don Ramey Logan/cc by-sa 4.0; David Wilson/cc by-sa 2.0; Pedro Szekely/cc-by-sa 2.0; U.S. Navy/Public domain; US DoD Service/U.S. Federal Government/Public domain; Sahmeditor/Nicole Ezell/Public domain; Bernard Gagnon/GFDL/cc by-sa 3.0; Trevor Brown/EyeEm/Getty Images; (interior)—Hulinska_Yevheniia/Getty Images Plus. Cover, pp. 1, 6—Andrew Haliburton/Alamy Stock Photo; pp. 8-9—Michael Dwyer/Alamy Stock Photo; p. 10— Darren McCollester/Stringer/ Getty Images News, (inset)—Marcbela/Public domain; p. 11—AP Photo/Michael Dwyer, File/Associated Press; p. 12—AP Photo/ Mel Evans/Associated Press; p.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: a Precast Bonanza
    PART 1 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: A Precast Bonanza by Vijay Chandra, P.E. Anthony 1. Ricci, RE. Senior Vice President Chief Bridge Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Central Artery/Tunnel Project Douglas, Inc. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority New York, New York Boston, Massachusetts This article provides an overview of the monumental efforts of Massachusetts transportation officials, their engineering consultants, and multitudes of construction industry professionals to ease congestion, improve motorist safety, and address issues of environmental quality in the heart of Boston, Massachusetts. The Central Artery/Tunnel Project is the largest highway construction job ever undertaken in the United States, involving many diverse types of precast concrete construction. maj or transportation infrastructure undertaking, • Standardized temporary structures utilizing precast con billed as “The Big Dig,” is transforming traffic op crete elements. A erations in and around Boston, Massachusetts. This • Precast segmental box girders integrated into cast-in-place $13.2 billion project, the biggest and most complex trans columns to provide seismically resistant connections. portation system ever undertaken in the United States, is • Precast segmental boxes cut at a skew to connect them on significant not only in this country, but worldwide. Nu either side of straddle bents. merous innovative construction techniques are being used, The project has brought out the best that precast con including: crete technology has to offer — in many cases utilizing • Precast tunnels jacked under railroad embankments. cutting edge techniques — and has been of immeasurable • Deep soil mixing to stabilize land reclaimed from the value to New England’s precasting industry. Precasters, ocean. faced with many complex and daunting challenges, are • Precast concrete immersed tube tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Paving Mismanagement by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff
    Office of the Inspector General Commonwealth of Massachusetts Gregory W. Sullivan Inspector General A Big Dig Cost Recovery Referral: Paving Mismanagement by Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff January 2005 January 2005 Dear Chairman Amorello: I am forwarding for your review the most recent findings from my Office’s continuing review of potential Big Dig cost recovery cases. These findings refer to poor contract redesign and construction management on the part of the joint venture of Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff (B/PB). Specifically, my Office found that B/PB failed to properly manage the paving of the East Boston roadway. A number of issues point to B/PB mismanagement that include: • B/PB approved and designed seven years of a quick fixes instead of a permanent roadway replacement; • B/PB’s design failed to account for manhole frames and covers in the roadway; and • B/PB paid a section design consultant for work that knowingly would never be used. As a result of B/PB’s mismanagement, taxpayers have paid approximately $7 million for seven years of quick fixes and the eventual permanent pavement replacement. This is particularly troubling because paving occurs regularly in construction projects not only in the Commonwealth but also across the country. Yet, it took B/PB over seven years to permanently repair the East Boston roadway. I recommend that this matter be referred to the Turnpike Authority’s cost recovery team. My staff is available to assist you in any continuing examination of this or any other issue. Thank you. Sincerely, Gregory W. Sullivan Inspector General This page intentionally left blank.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: Innovative Use of Precast Segmental Technology
    PART 2 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: Innovative Use of Precast Segmental Technology Paul J. Towell, P.E. Part 1 of this series of articles on Boston’s Central Senior Bridge Engineer Artery/Tunnel Project presented an overview of the Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff scope of the work. This Part 2 article describes the New York, New York innovative use of precast concrete segments, as well as other construction techniques, on two major interchanges. he $13.2 billion Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/ T) is a major reconstruction of the urban interstate Peter A. Mainville Thighway through downtown Boston, Massachusetts. Assistant Resident Engineer In the last issue, an overview of the entire project was given. Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff This second article on the project will focus on the inter- New York, New York changes that act as gateways to the project in various parts of the city. Most of the new structures are being built over and Vijay Chandra, P.E. around existing deteriorating interchanges that must carry Senior Vice President traffic during construction. As a result, maintenance of Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. traffic flow through existing interchanges and phased New York, New York construction of new interchanges were given priority. This, coupled with making the interchanges aesthetically pleasing and addressing urban planning issues, has been a challenge. Two major interchanges are located at the north and south ends of the I-93 corridor through Boston: the I-93/Route 1 Interchange in Charlestown (see Fig. 1) and the I-93/I-90 South Bay Interchange just south of downtown Boston (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Commercial User Guide Page 1 FINAL 1.12
    E-ZPass Account User Guide Welcome to the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission’s E-ZPass Commercial Account program. With E-ZPass, you will be able to pass through a toll facility without exchanging cash or tickets. It helps ease congestion at busy Pennsylvania Turnpike interchanges and works outside of Pennsylvania for seamless travel to many surrounding states; anywhere you see the purple E-ZPass sign (see attached detailed listing). The speed limit through E-ZPass lanes is 5-miles per hour unless otherwise posted. The 5-mile per hour limit is for the safety of all E-ZPass customers and Pennsylvania Turnpike employees. If you have any questions about your E-ZPass account, please contact your company representative or call the PTC E-ZPass Customer Service Center at 1.877.PENNPASS (1.877.736.6727) and ask for a Commercial E-ZPass Customer Service Representative. Information is also available on the web at www.paturnpike.com . How do I install my E-ZPass? Your E-ZPass transponder must be properly mounted following the instructions below to ensure it is properly read. Otherwise, you may be treated as a violator and charged a higher fare. Interior Transponder CLEAN and DRY the mounting surface using alcohol (Isopropyl) and a clean, dry cloth. REMOVE the clear plastic strips from the back of the mounting strips on the transponder to expose the adhesive surface. POSITION the transponder behind the rearview mirror on the inside of your windshield, at least one inch from the top. PLACE the transponder on the windshield with the E-ZPass logo upright, facing you, and press firmly.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did It Fail?
    Why Did It Fail? David W. Fowler The University of Texas at Austin CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar Ausn, Texas Why do structures fail? • Many reasons: – Design (45 to 55%) – Construction (20 to 30% – Materials (15 to 20%) – Administrative (10%) – Maintenance (5 to 10%) CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 2 Ausn, Texas Specific Causes 1. Ignorance/incompetence/inexperience 2. Blunders, errors, and omissions 3. Lack of supervision within organization 4. Lack of communication or continuity 5. Lack of coordination 6. Overemphasis on the bottom line (saving money) 7. Administrative deficiencies 8. Maintenance CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 3 Ausn, Texas Role of Forensic Engineer • Determine the cause of failure • Persuasively communicate his findings to the client and/or appropriate judicial venue • And in some cases, recommend corrections or repairs CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 4 Ausn, Texas We should learn from failures • History is one of our greatest teachers • Some our greatest lessons have come from failures • Unfortunately, the cause of many failures are sealed by agreement of the involved party and the public never learns some very important lessons • University of Maryland experience CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 5 Ausn, Texas Let’s look at some failures… • Tacoma Narrows Bridge Failure: Fowler • Big Dig Ceiling Panel Failure: Fowler • Case Study of Foundation Failure: Chancey CAEE Annual Alumni Ethics Seminar 6 Ausn, Texas TacomaTacoma NarrowsNarrows BridgeBridge • The most famous bridge failure in the U.S. • It was originally opened to traffic July 1, 1940. • It collapsed four months later, November 7, 1940, at 11:00 am. • It had been exhibiting signs of aerolastic flutter since it opened.
    [Show full text]
  • Boston's Economy 2019 the Boston Planning & Development Agency
    Boston's Economy 2019 The Boston Planning & Development Agency We strive to understand the current environment of the city to produce quality research and targeted information that will inform and benefit the residents and businesses of Boston. Our Division conducts research on Boston’s economy, population, and commercial markets for all departments of the BPDA, the City of Boston, and related organizations. The information provided in this report is the best available at the time of its publication. All or partial use of this report must be cited. Author: Boston Planning & Development Agency, Research Division. Date: September 2019. Cover Photo: Boston University by Above Summit. Information: Pease visit bostonplans.org/research-publications for more information. Requests: Please contact us at bostonplans.org/research-inquiries with additional questions. Research Division Director Senior Economist Research Managers Interns Alvaro Lima Matthew Resseger Kelly McGee Ahsim Shaaban Kayla Myros Dilara Sisman Deputy Director Senior Demographer Patrick Titterton Jonathan Lee Phillip Granberry Research Assistants Elizabeth Trauger Jing Chen Senior Research Associate Research Associate Avanti Krovi Christina Kim Kevin Kang Emily Korest Visit our website Follow us on Twitter BostonPlans.org twitter.com/BostonPlans Brian P. Golden, Director Contents Summary of Recent Trends in Boston's Economy ............................................................................... 5 Economic Growth ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]