Map Template

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Map Template y t Parcel 12 e a e tr Proposed Boston Our member/sponsors Christopher 5 S 0 w h Museum Project / t 3 r A Columbus n o t n la o Racewalker N t e n s t o ic Park B • Massachusetts Convention Center Authority e A k l r v a • Vanasse Hangen Brustlin e n W G u e © Strider e City bk • Sam Park & Co. h Hall rket Parcel 14 t incy Ma • Massport Qu Park n f Whar Stroller o Long • CEMUSA G k Annual • Eaton Vance l a Meeting 9 • Equity Office t R w Stree • Friends of Post Office Square State Pavilion a 60 New England • Goody Clancy State • Heinz Family FoundationE h Parcel 15 Aquarium t treet i S 8 te S • Liz Levin & Company Co Sta Park urt u w S • McCourt Companies, Inc. tre 4 r bl f E e t Old State a c • Rubin & Rudman d e y House A e • Whole Foods Markets a r t C N t e o 7 w a I r n n d y Thank you r g i n a S r t Parcel 16 e b Don Kindsvatter | Map ree e W s t s e Nina Garfinkle | Garfinkle Design | Design Park e l S r t Ann Hershfang | Bob Sloane | Don Eunson | Text e r e G c e B n t r t o y A e a You can strengthen our voice t e d — S e eet tr tr d e Str S ee r e g r t ate k t Parcel 17 WalkBoston's advocacy on behalf of pedestrians began S W il o n Y n n M i o Park t n 4 t in 1990 when a handful of like-minded citizens decided t g n i e they would be more effective speaking out collectively e h s 5 K e a than individually. Fifteen years later, WalkBoston has W s e grown to more than 500 members in 58 cities and towns, M s l supported by some 60 corporate/organizational o 6 o a lk Street members. More impressive is WalkBoston's record Mi R u t t Rowes of getting cities and towns, state agencies, developers, n e tree D O re h S | B t l ig A e institutions, and elected officials to recognize and n P.O. Square/ S iv H t Wharf v e in l l r a o A k S n accommodate the needs of walkers, as on the Rose n Leventhal an t r r t s International F e i c k h e Kennedy Greenway. Every additional voice helps h t i t r Park e Place Parcel 18 l WalkBoston's message to be heard. Become a 5 S 1 P 1 t 3 member, visit www.walkboston.org. r e Center e a e r s l for Arts ’ t S a tr n 2 e e and Culture t o C t o walkBoston Frank n lin Stree s t g re w o s M AKING OUR COMMUNITIES MORE W ALKABLE s S B t Old City Hall | 45 School Street | Boston MA 02108 | T: 617.367.9255 re k Parcel 19 New WALK Signal Timing e O l t A ld F: 617.367.9285 | [email protected] | www.walkboston.org Proposed Mass Hort ve No a nu rth e B er Facility ri n W d ge About WalkBoston The Rose Kennedy Greenway walk was removed and now only the pedestrian crossing Atlantic Avenue, a Harbor Park Pavilion will promote remains. WalkBoston advised on the crosswalks and use of the harbor islands and contain a small cafe, a Everyone walks at some point of every trip—to and 1Norman B. Leventhal Park Popularly known as Post curb radii changes. shop and an outdoor meeting place. from the car or the train, or all the way to your desti- Office Square Park and open since 1992, the park offers 5The Greenway Prior to construction of the Artery 9State Street & the Greenway The sidewalk at the nation. We promote, encourage and facilitate walking design lessons for the Greenway: space shielded from tunnel, there were 12 roadway lanes in this corridor— State/Surface Artery intersection is finished. It’s built and its many benefits. Walking is good for health, the street traffic and the ramps to a 1,400-car underground 6 surface lanes and 6 elevated highway lanes. The final to agreed-upon STAF Plan standards so you see the environment and local businesses. Our mission is to garage , diagonal paths, and an appealing restaurant. street design has cut this number in half, to a total of final widths. Although the sidewalk here is wide, trees create and preserve safe walking environments that All draw walkers into and across the space. The park’s 6 surface lanes—3 in each direction. Sidewalks are to were impossible to plant because underlying utilities build vital communities. WalkBoston is the state’s design anticipated its maintenance needs. Spare have an 8’ minimum walkway width, plus additional can’t be disturbed by roots. The remainder of sidewalks principal resource on walking issues. [Join online at benches and paving bricks are kept on hand. Repairs edge space for street furniture and lighting. Total along the Greenway will be constructed during 2005. www.walkboston.org]. of graffiti, bench vandalism and frequently damaged minimum sidewalk width is 15’ 7”. sidewalk bricks are made within 24 hours, assuring Using Boston’s once-in-a-century opportunity, Mayor WalkBoston’s successful advocacy that Leventhal Park is a continuous delight for down- Total street width is 37’ which includes two 11’ travel Thomas Menino’s “Crossroads Initiative” will extend town workers in winter and summer. lanes and one 14’ car/bicycle lane. STAF also specified the Greenway and harborfront design further up and Pedestrian advocacy means noticing the needs of locations for crosswalks, permanent and off-peak down 11 streets that cross or connect to the Greenway. Old Walk/Don’t Walk Lights Frequent and lengthy walkers and making them high priority—in both small 2 parking, and curb extensions. Each curb radius was On this walk, the “crossroads” are: State, Broad, Oliver WALK lights are crucial for walkers' convenience and details and big projects. Since it was founded in 1990, based on both vehicular and pedestrian needs. and Congress. WalkBoston’s special skill has been intervening at an safety. For decades, Boston’s signal timing required early stage to ensure good pedestrian conditions at people to push a button and wait a long time for WALK Two major challenges remain. One is working with the bkChristopher Columbus Park Good public spaces often the end, often years later. Three such lengthy projects [provoking jaywalking]. Well-timed lights will encourage City and CA/T to time traffic signals so that pedestrians result from the advocacy of an individual or citizens’ are the focus here—the Rose Kennedy Greenway pedestrians to wait and cross legally and safely, which get a WALK light at the same time cars going in the same group. In the early 1970s, the City’s waterfront Urban streetscape [13 years of WalkBoston work], Boston’s is a benefit to vehicular traffic too. direction get a green light. [This “concurrent green” is Renewal Plan proposed extensive building demolition new signal timing policy [10 years], and improvements standard in most U.S. cities and reflects the new policy.] and a parking garage where Christopher Columbus At the Congress/Franklin Street crossing, light timing at Congress/Court Streets [6 years]. Park is today. In 1973, waterfront residents and the could be better. On two sides, crossings are well timed The second is to protect public sidewalks from inappro- Sierra Club presented a detailed counter-proposal for for walkers to cross on the green light [with vehicles]. priate uses by developers that interrupt the pedestrian Our Greenway work since 1992 a Great Cove Square, which included a “system of At the others, walkers wait 90-100 seconds for a WALK right-of-way for loading, parking, and valet service. pedestrian streets,” and depressing the Central Artery[!]. signal of 7 seconds. A wait this long is considered Since it is the City of Boston’s responsibility to determine A key factor in the success of the Rose Kennedy To thwart demolition, a suit was filed against the City unsatisfactory for cars. For walkers it is unacceptable. and regulate sidewalk use, WalkBoston has suggested Greenway will be its walkability. When the Central Artery and one resident even jumped into the bucket of a Project (CA/T) received its environmental approvals in to the Boston Redevelopment Authority that the City 3Improved Walk/Don’t Walk lights In late 2004, front-end loader. Ultimately the waterfront/North End 1991, only 6 lanes were approved for the new streets develop guidelines that would ensure continuous, a new City traffic signal policy was initiated, with residents group succeeded in establishing the park above the tunnel. However, at the request of the City direct sidewalks along the Greenway. WalkBoston’s help. The Franklin/Pearl intersection has and moving Atlantic Avenue away from the harbor's of Boston, CA/T staff was designing 10 lanes. the new signal timing. Formerly 2 of the 4 crosswalks 6Rowes Wharf Streetscape Originally Rowes Wharf edge. We owe them a lot. here required pushing a button and you had a 110- had an outstanding wide sidewalk and crossings. The WalkBoston and Move Massachusetts 2000, with sup- blOld State House Plaza Traffic islands and pavement second wait for an 8-second WALK.
Recommended publications
  • Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Presented By
    Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council presented by Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Patricia Leavenworth, P.E., Chair November 2017 Annual Report of the Performance and Asset Management Advisory Council Executive Summary MassDOT’s progress in implementing asset management is keeping Massachusetts apace with Federal requirements. The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Federal Transit Administration (FTA) have implemented final transportation asset management (TAM) rules in 2017 that impact how MassDOT measures and communicates the condition of its assets. Transportation Asset Management Plans FHWA and FTA rules require the Highway Division, the MBTA, the Rail and Transit Division, and each RTA to complete a transportation asset management plan (TAMP for Highway, TAM Plan for transit). The status on these plans is as follows: Highway | Will be submitted to FHWA in April, 2018. MBTA | Will be submitted to FTA by October, 2018. Rail | A consultant has been retained for delivery of an asset management plan for rail by February, 2018. This plan is not required by any Federal rule, but MassDOT is pursuing it to improve asset management at the agency. Transit | MassDOT is making progress toward submitting the TAM Plan for MassDOT’s in-house transit assets and those of its Federal Aid sub-recipients to FTA by October, 2018. RTAs | Each RTA is at a different stage in the development of their asset management plans, due to the FTA by October, 2018. MassDOT is ready to assist if asked. Performance and Condition Key performance and asset management findings of this report are summarized below by asset type and division.
    [Show full text]
  • Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project
    TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD 1282 57 Computer-Aided Construction Planning for Boston's Central Artery Project BRIAN R. BRENNER Some new computer applications are being developed for and Roule IA applied to the construction planning and traffic studies associated with the design of the Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel in Boston. This project is one of the most massive and complex urban highway projects in the country. It features an immersed­ tube harbor tunnel, depression of the downtown expressway in a cut-and-cover tunnel without interrupting service on the existing overhead viaduct, major new or revised urban interchanges, and long-span river crossings. The construction site, with its old exist­ ing and historic buildings and subways, permits limited clear­ ances, posing formidable challenges to engineers planning the work. The computer applications described include computerized composite mapping for archeological planning; analysis of mul­ tilevel curved-girder viaducts; transportation forecasting using highway network models; planning associated with the construc­ tion of the depressed Central Artery tunnels; and computer-aided 1-90 planning and mitigation measures for underpinning, protection of a subway tube, and other construction problems. The Central Artery and Third Harbor Tunnel (CA/THT) SOUTH BOSTON project is a massive urban highway improvement job being planned and designed in Boston. A key map is shown in Figure 1. The work features the addition of a third harbor tunnel, a •••• • • • • Artery/Tunnel Project new immersed tube tunnel that will cross Boston Harbor and extend I-90 to Logan Airport and Route lA. The six-lane FIGURE 1 Key map, CA/THT project.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: a Precast Bonanza
    PART 1 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: A Precast Bonanza by Vijay Chandra, P.E. Anthony 1. Ricci, RE. Senior Vice President Chief Bridge Engineer Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Central Artery/Tunnel Project Douglas, Inc. Massachusetts Turnpike Authority New York, New York Boston, Massachusetts This article provides an overview of the monumental efforts of Massachusetts transportation officials, their engineering consultants, and multitudes of construction industry professionals to ease congestion, improve motorist safety, and address issues of environmental quality in the heart of Boston, Massachusetts. The Central Artery/Tunnel Project is the largest highway construction job ever undertaken in the United States, involving many diverse types of precast concrete construction. maj or transportation infrastructure undertaking, • Standardized temporary structures utilizing precast con billed as “The Big Dig,” is transforming traffic op crete elements. A erations in and around Boston, Massachusetts. This • Precast segmental box girders integrated into cast-in-place $13.2 billion project, the biggest and most complex trans columns to provide seismically resistant connections. portation system ever undertaken in the United States, is • Precast segmental boxes cut at a skew to connect them on significant not only in this country, but worldwide. Nu either side of straddle bents. merous innovative construction techniques are being used, The project has brought out the best that precast con including: crete technology has to offer — in many cases utilizing • Precast tunnels jacked under railroad embankments. cutting edge techniques — and has been of immeasurable • Deep soil mixing to stabilize land reclaimed from the value to New England’s precasting industry. Precasters, ocean. faced with many complex and daunting challenges, are • Precast concrete immersed tube tunnels.
    [Show full text]
  • Central Artery/Tunnel Project: Innovative Use of Precast Segmental Technology
    PART 2 Central Artery/Tunnel Project: Innovative Use of Precast Segmental Technology Paul J. Towell, P.E. Part 1 of this series of articles on Boston’s Central Senior Bridge Engineer Artery/Tunnel Project presented an overview of the Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff scope of the work. This Part 2 article describes the New York, New York innovative use of precast concrete segments, as well as other construction techniques, on two major interchanges. he $13.2 billion Central Artery/Tunnel Project (CA/ T) is a major reconstruction of the urban interstate Peter A. Mainville Thighway through downtown Boston, Massachusetts. Assistant Resident Engineer In the last issue, an overview of the entire project was given. Bechtel/Parsons Brinckerhoff This second article on the project will focus on the inter- New York, New York changes that act as gateways to the project in various parts of the city. Most of the new structures are being built over and Vijay Chandra, P.E. around existing deteriorating interchanges that must carry Senior Vice President traffic during construction. As a result, maintenance of Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. traffic flow through existing interchanges and phased New York, New York construction of new interchanges were given priority. This, coupled with making the interchanges aesthetically pleasing and addressing urban planning issues, has been a challenge. Two major interchanges are located at the north and south ends of the I-93 corridor through Boston: the I-93/Route 1 Interchange in Charlestown (see Fig. 1) and the I-93/I-90 South Bay Interchange just south of downtown Boston (see Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Esplanade Cultural Landscape Report - Introduction 1
    C U L T U R A L L A N D S C A P E R E P O R T T H E E S P L A N A D E B O S T O N , M A S S A C H U S E T T S Prepared for The Esplanade Association 10 Derne Street Boston, MA 02114 Prepared by Shary Page Berg FASLA 11 Perry Street Cambridge, MA 02139 April 2007 CONTENTS Introduction . 1 PART I: HISTORICAL OVERVIEW 1. Early History (to 1893) . 4 Shaping the Land Beacon Hill Flat Back Bay Charlesgate/Bay State Road Charlesbank and the West End 2. Charles River Basin (1893-1928) . 11 Charles Eliot’s Vision for the Lower Basin The Charles River Dam The Boston Esplanade 3. Redesigning the Esplanade (1928-1950) . 20 Arthur Shurcliff’s Vision: 1929 Plan Refining the Design 4. Storrow Drive and Beyond (1950-present) . 30 Construction of Storrow Drive Changes to Parkland Late Twentieth Century PART II: EXISTING CONDITIONS AND ANALYSIS 5. Charlesbank. 37 Background General Landscape Character Lock Area Playground/Wading Pool Area Lee Pool Area Ballfields Area 6. Back Bay. 51 Background General Landscape Character Boating Area Hatch Shell Area Back Bay Area Lagoons 7. Charlesgate/Upper Park. 72 Background General Landscape Character Charlesgate Area Linear Park 8. Summary of Findings . 83 Overview/Landscape Principles Character Defining Features Next Steps BIBLIOGRAPHY. 89 APPENDIX A – Historic Resources . 91 APPENDIX B – Planting Lists . 100 INTRODUCTION BACKGROUND The Esplanade is one of Boston’s best loved and most intensively used open spaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Civic Leadership and the Big Dig…………………………………………………………...1
    CCCIVICIVICIVIC LLLEADERSHIP ANDANDAND THETHETHE BBBIGIGIG DDDIGIGIG BBBYYY DDDAVAVIDIDAVID LLLUBEUBERROFFOFFUBEROFF WWWORORKIKINGORKINGNG PPPAPERAPERAPER 111111 MMMAYAYAY 3 3,3,, 200420 200404 RRRAPPAPORT IIINSTITUTE FOR GGGREREAATTEERREATERR BBBOSTOOSTOOSTONOSTONNN TTTAUBMAUBMANANAUBMAN CCCENTER FOR SSSTATE AND LLLOCAL GGGOVERNMENT JJJOHOHNOHNN FFF. KKKEENNENNEDDYYENNEDY SSSCHOOL OF GGGOVERNMENT HHHARARVVARARDDARVARD UUUNIVERSITY RRRAPPAPORT I NSTITUTE F OR GGGREATERREATERREATER B OSTONOSTONOSTON The Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston, based at Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Govern- ment, works to improve the policy and governance in the Greater Boston area by contributing useful and aca- demically rigorous research to inform policy debates, engaging students in public service, strengthening net- works of academics and practitioners involved in public policy work, promoting dialogue on policy matters in forums and on the web, and providing training for municipal officials in the Greater Boston area. Contact the Rappaport Institute at: Rappaport Institute for Greater Boston John F. Kennedy School of Government 79 John F. Kennedy Street Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138 Telephone: (617) 495-5091 Fax:( 617) 496-1722 Email: [email protected] Web: www.ksg.harvard.edu/rappaport TTTAUBMANAUBMANAUBMAN C ENTERENTERENTER F OR SSSTATE AND LLLOCAL GGGOVERNMENT The Taubman Center for State and Local Government and its affiliated institutes and programs are the Kennedy School of Government's focal point for activities
    [Show full text]
  • Volpe Technical Report Template
    Economic Development and Highway Right-Sizing Credit: Gerald P. Hawkins Credit: Daniel Schwen November 2018 Notice This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The United States Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The United States Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient’s Catalog No. FHWA-HEP-19-015 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date November 2018 Economic Development and Highway Right-Sizing: White Paper 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Authors 8. Performing Organization Report Kaitlin Coppinger, Douglass Lee, Sari Radin, Catherine Taylor No. DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-19-02 9. Performing Organization Name and Address 10. Work Unit No. (TRAIS) U.S. Department of Transportation John A Volpe National Transportation Systems Center 55 Broadway Cambridge, MA 02142-1093 11. Contract or Grant No. 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address 13. Type of Report and Period United States Department of Transportation Covered Federal Highway Administration White Paper, July 2017 - November 2018 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590 14. Sponsoring Agency Code 15. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract The old “one-size-fits-all” approach to transportation divided communities and left them with gaps in existing transportation and infrastructure. Newer, context-sensitive solutions, like right-sizing, are an innovative approach to addressing this aging infrastructure. Instead of policies seeking only to appropriately match land use and transportation contexts on existing streets, right-sizing projects provide the opportunity to develop community- oriented transportation policies that promote safety, community well-being, and help the community achieve broader economic development goals.
    [Show full text]
  • Ted Williams Tunnel) for Parking in Our Building
    Middleton & Company, Inc. 600 Atlantic Avenue 18th Floor Boston, MA 02210-2211 Toll-free: 800-357-5101 Fax: 617-357-7199 [email protected] Parking Information Coming from Logan International Airport: Please call ahead to arrange 1. Follow directions to Airport Exit towards I-90 West (Ted Williams Tunnel) for parking in our building. 2. Continue through tolls and Ted Williams Tunnel Advance reservations are 3. Take Exit 24-25 towards I93 North/South Boston essential. 4. Keep right at fork in ramp 5. Turn slight right onto Congress Street We also validate parking at 6. Turn slight right onto D Street the Garage At Post Office 7. Turn right onto Summer Street and go to 2nd set of lights Square. Please present your 8. The building is located just after the lights across the bridge at the corner of Summer Street and Dorchester ticket to our receptionist for Avenue (across from South Station) validation. Coming from 93 South or Route 1 South over the Central Artery, southbound: Public Transportation 1. Take the I-93 South/US-1 South towards Boston/Cape Cod to Exit 23 “Purchase Street/South Station” Our building is on Atlantic 2. At top of ramp, continue straight on Purchase Street Avenue, next door to South 3. At the 3rd set of lights, turn left onto Summer Street Station, which is accessible 4. The building is located at the corner of Summer Street and Atlantic Avenue, across from South Station via the Red Line, the Silver Line, Commuter Rail and Coming from the Southeast Expressway, northbound: Amtrak.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Dig” in the Age of Privatization Michael R
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarsArchive at Johnson & Wales University Johnson & Wales University ScholarsArchive@JWU Humanities Department Faculty Publications & College of Arts & Sciences Research 12-5-2011 Tunnel Vision: “Invisible” Highways and Boston’s “Big Dig” in the Age of Privatization Michael R. Fein Johnson & Wales University - Providence, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/humanities_fac Part of the Cultural History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, Other History Commons, Political History Commons, Social History Commons, and the United States History Commons Repository Citation Fein, Michael R., "Tunnel Vision: “Invisible” Highways and Boston’s “Big Dig” in the Age of Privatization" (2011). Humanities Department Faculty Publications & Research. 33. https://scholarsarchive.jwu.edu/humanities_fac/33 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the College of Arts & Sciences at ScholarsArchive@JWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Humanities Department Faculty Publications & Research by an authorized administrator of ScholarsArchive@JWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Journal of Planning History 000(00) 1-23 ª 2011 The Author(s) Tunnel Vision: ‘‘Invisible’’ Reprints and permission: sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Highways and Boston’s DOI: 10.1177/1538513211425209 http://jph.sagepub.com ‘‘Big Dig’’ in the Age of Privatization Michael R. Fein1 Abstract While most analyses of late-twentieth-century highway policy suggest a shift toward open system design, bottom-up federalism, and the devolution of transportation governance, the history of Boston’s Central Artery/Tunnel project, informally known as the ‘‘Big Dig,’’ runs counter to this trend.
    [Show full text]
  • Comprehensive Tolling Plan for Additional Interstate and Controlled Access State Highways in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
    Comprehensive Tolling Plan for Additional Interstate and Controlled Access State Highways in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Report to the Legislature December, 2013 Report to the Legislature Comprehensive Tolling Plan Comprehensive Tolling Plan for Additional Interstate and Limited Access State Highways in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... i 1 PURPOSE AND NEED.......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Massachusetts Legislative Requirements............................................................................................ 1 1.2 Funding Goals .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 MassDOT Policy Goals ........................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Federal Tolling Policy ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.5 State Laws and Tolling........................................................................................................................ 8 1.6 Study Approach ............................................................................................................................... 10 2 RECENT STUDIES AND TOLL DEVELOPMENTS
    [Show full text]
  • Boston, Massachusetts, USA
    Project I-90/I-93 Interchange, 1-93 Northbound (C 9A4), 0 Boston, Massachusetts, USA This demanding highway tunnel project took place just south of downtown Boston, adjacent to South station with its major railtrack structures, the I-90 and I-93 Interstate highways and the tidal Fort Point Channel. Part of the larger Boston Central Artery/Tunnel Project, it comprised the construction of three highway tunnels at only a slight depth beneath very active rail tracks and under the worst possible ground conditions. The joint venture SIWP developed an alternative design, which allowed earlier access for at-grade and viaduct construction, thereby substantially shortening the critical path to surface and viaduct work completion. The joint venture and the client shared the ensuing savings of more than $ 3.3 million. The alternative method was awarded the AASHTO Certificate for the most cost-effective Value Engineering Cost Proposal in 1999. Location Boston, Massachusetts, USA Client The Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts Highway Department Contractor Joint venture SIWP: Slattery-Skanska, BAM International, J.F. White Contracting, Perini Contract period January 1997 – September 2003 Contract sum $ 475 million ‘Widely recognised as the most demanding component of the Boston’s Central Artery/ Tunnel project.’ June 2010 626065-159 Segment installation above the railway tracks Scope of work The major work of the project consisted of extending the I-90 highway eastward in tunnels under the I-93 and railroad tracks, constructing the I-93 Northbound viaduct to the tunnel portal at South Station and building the connecting tunnel and viaduct ramps. All in all, the project included three jacked tunnels, seven cast-in-place tunnels and boat sections, nine precast segmental viaducts and five approach structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Massdot-FHWA Pilot Project Report: Climate Change and Extreme Weather Vulnerability Assessments and Adaptation Options for the Central Artery
    MassDOT-FHWA Pilot Project Report: Climate Change and Extreme Weather Vulnerability Assessments And Adaptation Options for the Central Artery June 2015 Project Team: Kirk Bosma, P.E., Woods Hole Group, Inc. Ellen Douglas, P.E., Ph.D., UMass Boston Paul Kirshen, Ph.D., University of New Hampshire Katherin McArthur, MassDOT Steven Miller, MassDOT Chris Watson, M.Sc., UMass Boston Acknowledgements The authors wish to thank many people for their assistance in this project. They include, but are not limited to, Lt. Dave Albanese, Jeff Amero, John Anthony, Kathleen Baskin, Natalie Beauvais, David Belanger, Carolyn Bennett, John Bolduc, Dennis Carlberg, Bruce Carlisle, Joe Choiniere, Michael Chong, Lisa Dickson, Nate Dill, David Dinocco, Jeff Dusenbery, Kerry Emanuel, Rob Evans, Joe Famely, M. Leslie Fields, John Gendall, William A. Gode-von Aesch, Marybeth Groff, Robert Hamilton, Robyn Hannigan, Elizabeth Hanson, Arden Herrin, Eric Holmes, Nick Hugon, Mike Hutcheon, Bob Hutchen, Christian Jacqz, Charlie Jewell, Ron Killian, Leland Kirshen, Julia Knisel, Brian Knowles, Stephanie Kruel, Wes LaParl, Elise Leduc, Donna Lee, Vivien Li, Kevin Lopes, Rebecca Lupes, Kristen Mathieu, Rick McCullough, Lisa Grogan-McCulloch, Connor McKay, John McVann, Ellen Mecray, Stephen Morash, Dan Mullaly, Cynthia Nurmi, Paul Nutting, Daniel Nvule, Robbin Peach, William Pisano, Owen O’Riordan, Geoffrey Rainoff, Vandana Rao, Lawanda Riggs, Leo Scanlon, Stephen Estes- Smargiassi, Carl Spector, John Sullivan, Nadine Sweeney, Rob Thieler, Kevin Walsh, Peter Walworth,
    [Show full text]