DOCSLIB.ORG

5 Sword 10 Pollaxe 7 Flail 8 Spear 1 Halberd 7 Two-Hande

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
5 Sword 10 Pollaxe 7 Flail 8 Spear 1 Halberd 7 Two-Hande Item Cost Item Cost Dagger 3 Chain Barding 150 Francisca 3 Plate Barding 500 Battle Axe 5 50’ of Rope 1 Mace (incl. spiked) 5 10’ Pole 1 Sword 10 12 Iron Spikes 1 Pollaxe 7 Small Sack 1 Flail 8 Large Sack 2 Spear 1 Leather Back Pack 5 Halberd 7 Water/Wine Skin 1 Two-Handed Sword 15 6 Torches 1 Mounted Lance 4 Lantern 10 Pike 5 Flask of Oil 2 Bow 25 3 Stakes & Mallet 3 Long Bow 40 Steel Mirror 5 Crossbow 25 Silver Mirror, Small 15 Quiver of 20 Arrows 10 Wooden Cross 2 Case with 30 Quarrels 10 Silver Cross 25 20 Arrows/30 Quarrels 5 Holy Water/Vial 25 Silver Tipped Arrow 5 Wolvesbane, bunch 10 Mule 20 Belladonna, bunch 10 Draft Horse 30 Garlic, bud 5 Light Horse 40 Wine, quart 1 Warhorse, Medium 100 Rations, 1 person/1 week 5 Warhorse, Heavy 200 Saddle 25 Armor Class values of armor types Saddle Bags 10 Unarmored Horse 7 Cart 100 Chain Barding 5 Wagon 200 Plate Barding 3 Raft 40 Unarmored Man 9 Small Boat 100 Padded Coat 7 Small Merchant Ship 5 000 Chain Mail 5 Large Merchant Ship 20 000 Plate Mail 3 Small Galley 10 000 Suit of Plate Armor 1 Large Galley 30 000 Shield – Lowers Armor Class by 1 in melee Padded Coat 15 combat and by 3 against missile attacks. Chain Mail 50 Plate Mail (Brigandine) 200 The lowest possible Armor Class Suit of Plate Armor 1 000 achievable without magical means is 0. Helmet 10 Shield 10 1 Weapon + to hit Special properties Two-Handed Sword +2 Additional +2 against Unarmored and Padded Coat and +1 against all types of Mail armor. Requires two hands. Pollaxe +2 Additional +2 against all types of Mail armor and +1 against Suit of Plate. Requires two hands. Flail +1 Treats all types of Plate armor as Chain Mail. Requires two hands. Halberd +1 50 % chance to dismount a rider with each attack. Can be used to attack from the second rank. Can be set to receive a charge. Requires two hands. Battle Axe 0 +1 against Chain Mail. Mounted Lance 0 A mounted charge with a Lance ignores any armor and deals two dice of damage with a succesful attack. 5-in-6 chance to break after dealing damage. Pike 0 Usable only in formations. Pike formations cannot be attacked from the front except by other equivalent formations or with missiles. Requires two hands. Sword 0 +1 against Unarmored and Padded Coat. Dagger -1 Treats prone targets in Suit of Plate as Padded Coat. Francisca -1 Can be thrown. Mace -1 Treats all types of Plate armor as Chain Mail. Spear -1/+1 Can be used to attack from the second rank. Can be set to receive a charge. Can be thrown. Can be used two-handed, functioning as a +1 weapon. Long Bow +2 Requires two hands. Crossbow +1 Requires two hands to reload, but not to fire. Bow +0 Requires two hands. 2 Item Load (weight and bulk) in coins A man 1750 Padded Coat, Saddle 250 Chain Mail 500 Plate Mail, Chain Barding 750 Suit of Plate Armor 1000 Plate Barding 1250 Helmet 50 Shield 150 Pike 500 Halberd, Two-Handed Sword 250 Pollaxe, Flail 200 Spear 100 Battle Axe, Mace, Sword 50 Dagger, Francisca 25 Bow 50 Crossbow 100 Long Bow 200 Misc. Equipment (rope, spikes, bags, etc.) 50 Total load in coins Rate of movement in feet per move 0 – 750 120 751 – 1000 90 1001 – 1500 60 1501 – 3000 30 1 Small Sack Holds 50 1 Large Sack or Back Pack Holds 300 1 Coin (Copper, Silver, or Gold) 1 1 Gem 1 1 Scroll or Piece of Jewelry 25 1 Potion or Wine Skin 25 1 Flagon or Chalice 50 1 Wand with Case 100 1 Staff with Case 300 3.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • From Knights' Armour to Smart Work Clothes
    September 16, 2020 Suits of steel: from knights’ armour to smart work clothes From traditional metal buttons to futuristic military exoskeletons, which came to the real world from the pages of comics. From the brigandines of medieval dandies to modern fire-resistant clothing for hot work areas. Steel suits have come a long way, and despite a brief retreat caused by a “firearm”, they are again conquering the battlefields and becoming widely used in cutting-edge operations. Ancestors of skins and cotton wool The first armour that existed covered the backs of warriors. For the Germanic tribes who attacked the Roman Empire, it was not considered shameful to escape battle. They protected their chests by dodging, while covering their backs, which became vulnerable when fleeing, with thick animal skins over the shoulders. Soldiers of ancient Egypt and Greece wore multi-layer glued and quilted clothes as armour. Mexican Aztecs faced the conquistadors in quilted wadded coats a couple of fingers thick. In turn, the Spanish borrowed the idea from the Mexicans. In medieval Europe, such protective clothing was widely used up to the 16th century. The famous Caucasian felt cloak also began life as armour. Made of wool using felting technology, it was invulnerable against steel sabres , arrows and even some types of bullets. Metal armour: milestones Another ancient idea for protective clothing was borrowed from animals. The scaled skin of pangolins was widely used as armour by Indian noble warriors, the Rajputs. They began to replicate a scaly body made of copper back in ancient Mesopotamia, then they began to use brass and later steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 0 Menu Roman Armour Page 1 400BC - 400AD Worn by Roman Legionaries
    Roman Armour Chain Mail Armour Transitional Armour Plate Mail Armour Milanese Armour Gothic Armour Maximilian Armour Greenwich Armour Armour Diagrams Page 0 Menu Roman Armour Page 1 400BC - 400AD Worn by Roman Legionaries. Replaced old chain mail armour. Made up of dozens of small metal plates, and held together by leather laces. Lorica Segmentata Page 1 100AD - 400AD Worn by Roman Officers as protection for the lower legs and knees. Attached to legs by leather straps. Roman Greaves Page 1 ?BC - 400AD Used by Roman Legionaries. Handle is located behind the metal boss, which is in the centre of the shield. The boss protected the legionaries hand. Made from several wooden planks stuck together. Could be red or blue. Roman Shield Page 1 100AD - 400AD Worn by Roman Legionaries. Includes cheek pieces and neck protection. Iron helmet replaced old bronze helmet. Plume made of Hoarse hair. Roman Helmet Page 1 100AD - 400AD Soldier on left is wearing old chain mail and bronze helmet. Soldiers on right wear newer iron helmets and Lorica Segmentata. All soldiers carry shields and gladias’. Roman Legionaries Page 1 400BC - 400AD Used as primary weapon by most Roman soldiers. Was used as a thrusting weapon rather than a slashing weapon Roman Gladias Page 1 400BC - 400AD Worn by Roman Officers. Decorations depict muscles of the body. Made out of a single sheet of metal, and beaten while still hot into shape Roman Cuiruss Page 1 ?- 400AD Chain Mail Armour Page 2 400BC - 1600AD Worn by Vikings, Normans, Saxons and most other West European civilizations of the time.
    [Show full text]
  • Plate Armor (Edited from Wikipedia)
    Plate Armor (Edited from Wikipedia) SUMMARY Plate armor is a historical type of personal body armor made from iron or steel plates, culminating in the iconic suit of armor entirely encasing the wearer. While there are early predecessors, full plate armor developed in Europe during the Late Middle Ages, especially in the context of the Hundred Years' War, from the coat of plates worn over mail suits during the 13th century. In Europe, plate armor reached its peak in the late 15th and early 16th centuries. The full suit of armor is thus a feature of the very end of the Middle Ages and of the Renaissance period. Its popular association with the "medieval knight" is due to the specialized jousting armor which developed in the 16th century. Full suits of Gothic plate armor were worn on the battlefields of the Burgundian and Italian Wars. The most heavily armored troops of the period were heavy cavalry such as the gendarmes and early cuirassiers, but the infantry troops of the Swiss mercenaries and the landsknechts also took to wearing lighter suits of "three quarters" munition armor, leaving the lower legs unprotected. The use of plate armor declined in the 17th century, but it remained common both among the nobility and for the cuirassiers throughout the European wars of religion. After 1650, plate armor was mostly reduced to the simple breastplate (cuirass) worn by cuirassiers. This was due to the development of the flintlock musket, which could penetrate armor at a considerable distance. For infantry, the breastplate gained renewed importance with the development of shrapnel in the late Napoleonic wars.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ARMOURER and HIS CRAFT from the Xith to the Xvith CENTURY by CHARLES FFOULKES, B.Litt.Oxon
    GQ>0<J> 1911 CORNELL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY BOUGHT WITH THE INCOME OF THE SAGE ENDOWMENT FUND GIVEN IN 1891 BY HENRY WILLIAMS SAGE Cornell University Ubrary NK6606 .F43 1912 The armourer and his craft from the xith C Date iSIORAGE 3 1924 030 681 278 Overs olin a^(Mr;= :3fff=iqfPfr.g^h- r^ n .^ I aAri.^ ^ Cornell University Library XI The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text. http://www.archive.org/details/cu31924030681278 THE ARMOURER AND HIS CRAFT UNIFORM WITH THIS VOLUME PASTE By A. Beresford Ryley < 'A w <1-1 K 2; < > o 2 o 2; H ffi Q 2; < w K o w u > w o o w K H H P W THE ARMOURER AND HIS CRAFT FROM THE XIth TO THE XVIth CENTURY By CHARLES FFOULKES, B.Litt.Oxon. WITH SIXTY-NINE DIAGRAMS IN THE TEXT AND THIRTY-TWO PLATES METHUEN & CO. LTD. 36 ESSEX STREET W.G. LONDON Kc tf , First Published in igi2 TO THE RIGHT HONOURABLE THE VISCOUNT DILLON, Hon. M.A. Oxon. V.P.S.A., Etc. Etc. CURATOR OF THE TOWER ARMOURIES PREFACE DO not propose, in this work, to consider the history or develop- ment of defensive armour, for this has been more or less fully I discussed in v^orks which deal with the subject from the historical side of the question. I have rather endeavoured to compile a work which will, in some measure, fill up a gap in the subject, by collecting all the records and references, especially in English documents, which relate to the actual making of armour and the regulations which con- trolled the Armourer and his Craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland During the Guelders War1
    James P. Ward Prices of Weapons and Munitions in Early Sixteenth Century Holland during the Guelders War1 1. Introduction The adage that to have peace one has to prepare for war may not be of Classical antiquity but the principle was known to Livy and the Ancients,2 and so the influence of the weapons industry on world peace and economy hardly needs to be emphasized now. The purpose of this article is both to present data on retail prices of individual weapons and munitions of war in the first decades of the sixteenth century in Holland, and to show how the magistrates there prepared to defend their cities against an aggressor by purchasing weapons to arm the citizens. Prices quoted here for strategic commodities of war in the early sixteenth century complement those given by Posthumus in his survey of prices for the later sixteenth century and beyond.3 Kuypers published inventories of weapons maintained in castles and elsewhere in Holland and the Netherlands in the first half of the sixteenth century, but the cities of Holland were not included in his descriptions.4 A recent study by De Jong reveals the growth of the early modern weapons industry in the Republic of the United Netherlands in the period 1585-1621 as part of a process of state formation based on entrepreneurship, economic growth and military reform.5 As sources for the present investigation accounts of the Treasurer for North-Holland at The Hague, and of the city treasurers of Haarlem, Leiden, Dordrecht and Gouda were examined for expenditures on weapons and munitions.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 IQP-48-JLS-0062 Pikes for the People: an Interactive Pike
    1 IQP-48-JLS-0062 Pikes for the People: An Interactive Pike Demonstration Interactive Qualifying Project Proposal Submitted to the Faculty of the WORCESTER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by _____________________________ _____________________________ Jotham Kildea Huan Lai _____________________________ _____________________________ Kevin McManus Matthew Sonntag February 14, 2010 _______________________________ Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng. Major Advisor 2 Contents Abstract ................................................................................................................................ 4 Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 Acknowledgements: .............................................................................................................. 8 The Evolution of Military Organization and the Rise of Military Professionalism ................. 9 By Huan Lai ...................................................................................................................... 9 Technological Development and Its Effects on Warfare .............................................. 12 Medieval Military Strategies and Tactics ..................................................................... 15 Economic and Political Implications of Warfare in Medieval Europe .......................... 18 An overview of the historical context of war in Europe between 1500 and 1650. ................
    [Show full text]
  • Military Technology in the 12Th Century
    Zurich Model United Nations MILITARY TECHNOLOGY IN THE 12TH CENTURY The following list is a compilation of various sources and is meant as a refer- ence guide. It does not need to be read entirely before the conference. The breakdown of centralized states after the fall of the Roman empire led a number of groups in Europe turning to large-scale pillaging as their primary source of income. Most notably the Vikings and Mongols. As these groups were usually small and needed to move fast, building fortifications was the most efficient way to provide refuge and protection. Leading to virtually all large cities having city walls. The fortifications evolved over the course of the middle ages and with it, the battle techniques and technology used to defend or siege heavy forts and castles. Designers of castles focused a lot on defending entrances and protecting gates with drawbridges, portcullises and barbicans as these were the usual week spots. A detailed ref- erence guide of various technologies and strategies is compiled on the following pages. Dur- ing the third crusade and before the invention of gunpowder the advantages and the balance of power and logistics usually favoured the defender. Another major advancement and change since the Roman empire was the invention of the stirrup around 600 A.D. (although wide use is only mentioned around 900 A.D.). The stirrup enabled armoured knights to ride war horses, creating a nearly unstoppable heavy cavalry for peasant draftees and lightly armoured foot soldiers. With the increased usage of heavy cav- alry, pike infantry became essential to the medieval army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Virtual Tour
    Worcester Polytechnic Institute Digital WPI Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) Interactive Qualifying Projects April 2012 The irV tual Tour Elizabeth Laura Mayor Worcester Polytechnic Institute Justin Henry McLaughlin Worcester Polytechnic Institute Kai He Worcester Polytechnic Institute Seth Michael Lipkind Worcester Polytechnic Institute Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/iqp-all Repository Citation Mayor, E. L., McLaughlin, J. H., He, K., & Lipkind, S. M. (2012). The Virtual Tour. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.wpi.edu/ iqp-all/2641 This Unrestricted is brought to you for free and open access by the Interactive Qualifying Projects at Digital WPI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Interactive Qualifying Projects (All Years) by an authorized administrator of Digital WPI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Virtual Tour Interactive Qualifying Project Submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by Runzi Gao Kai He Seth Lipkind Elizabeth Mayor Justin McLaughlin Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng, Major Advisor ii iii Abstract This project integrated technology and history to transform the visitor experience at the Higgins Armory Museum. The team upgraded the museum’s “Virtual Armory” website, creating a Virtual Tour with interactive and multimedia content for over a dozen pieces in the Higgins collection, including videos, animations, interactive graphics, and a Flash-based minigame. The team
    [Show full text]
  • For BUHURT CATEGORIES Rules for BUHURT CATEGORIES
    Historical Medieval Battle International Association Rules for BUHURT CATEGORIES Rules for BUHURT CATEGORIES GENERAL REGULATIONS 1.1 Historical Medieval Battle (HMB) is full contact sporting combat in which historical protective and offensive arms of the Middle Ages – made especially and adjusted to suit this kind of competition – are used. HMBs are held in the lists of standardized dimensions, with different types of authentic weapons, depending on the kind of a battle. The concept of HMB includes all kinds of full contact combat with the use of items of Historical Reenactment of the Middle Ages (HRMA), namely historical fencing, buhurts, melee, duels, small group battles, mass field battles, professional fights, etc. HMBs are always held in full contact, but are represented by different categories with various authorized and prohibited techniques. In addition, victory conditions, battle regulations, tournament schemes and other parameters are different. 1.2 All HMBs are held under control and observation of a marshal’s (referee’s) group, including one knight marshal (main referee), field referees, linesmen and referees monitoring the video coverage and authenticity master. The number of members of the marshal’s group is established separately for each event, depending on its format and content. The presence of the knight marshal and field referees is required in every type of combat. The presence of a member of authenticity committee is strongly recommended. 1.2.1. The knighvt marshal is selected by the event organizers. In case of any disagreement the knight marshal’s decision is final. 1.2.2. The records of the combat process and combat results are made by the secretariat.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Update to NIJ Guide 100–98) U.S
    NOTICE Portions of this guide have been superseded by NCJ 247281, Selection and Application Guide to Ballistic-Resistant Body Armor For Law Enforcement, Corrections and Public Safety: NIJ Selection and Application Guide-0101.06. This new resource supersedes the portions of NIJ Guide 100-01 (NCJ 189633) that deal with ballistic-resistant armor. It does not supersede those portions that deal with stab-resistant armor. A separate guide on stab-resistant armor will be published when NIJ Standard-0115.00, Stab Resistance of Personal Body Armor (NCJ 183652), is updated. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Update to NIJ Guide 100–98) U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs 810 Seventh Street N.W. Washington, DC 20531 John Ashcroft Attorney General Deborah J. Daniels Assistant Attorney General Sarah V. Hart Director, National Institute of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice World Wide Web Site World Wide Web Site http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs National Institute of Justice Selection and Application Guide to Personal Body Armor NIJ Guide 100–01 (Replaces Selection and Application Guide to Police Body Armor, NIJ Guide 100–98) November 2001 Published by: The National Institute of Justice’s National Law Enforcement and Corrections Technology Center Lance Miller, Testing Manager P.O. Box 1160, Rockville, MD 20849–1160 800–248–2742; 301–519–5060 NCJ 189633 National Institute of Justice Sarah V.
    [Show full text]
  • AMERICAN INDIAN TOMAHAWKS Frontispiece
    f PETERSON: AMERICAN INDIAN TOMAHAWKS Frontispiece AN EXAMPLE OF A PIPE TOMAHAWK WITH EXTREMELY ELABORATE DECORATION {see No. i6i) CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN HEYE FOUNDATION Vol. XIX AMERICAN INDIAN TOMAHAWKS by HAROLD L PETERSON With an Appendix -. THE BLACKSMITH SHOP by MILFORD G. CHANDLER MUSEUM OF THE AMERICAN INDIAN HEYE FOUNDATION 1971 1 First published in 1965 Revised Edition 197 Library of Congress Catalogue card number 73-125345 Printed in Germany at J. J. Augustin, Gliickstadt Price: $10.00 APR 2 y '^uio CONTENTS PAGE Illustrations iv Foreword vii Introduction i Chapter I. A Matter of Words 4 II. The Indian and the Tomahawk 8 III. The Simple Hatchet or Belt Axe 18 IV. The Missouri War Hatchet 22 V. The Spontoon Tomahawk 24 VI. The Halberd or "Battle Axe" Tomahawk 27 VII. The Spiked Tomahawk 29 VIII. Tomahawks with Hammer Polls 31 IX. Celtiform Tomahawks 32 X. The Pipe Tomahawk 33 XL The White Man and the Tomahawk 40 XII. Naval Boarding Axes 44 Directory of Makers and Dealers 46 Index to Provenience 53 Appendix: "The Blacksmith's Shop," hy Milford G. Chandler 55 Bibliography 78 Captions to Photographs 83 111 . IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS Plates I. Decorated Pipe Tomahawk frontispiece (following page 32) 11. Sketch of an Indian throwing a tomahawk. III. Engraved powder horn. IV. Sketches of mid-igth century weapons, by Seth Eastman. V. Page from Lewis and Clark's journal. VI. Page from Lewis and Clark's journal. VII. King Hendrick of the Mohawks. VIII. Cornplanter, painted by Frederick BartoU. IX. Sa Ga Yeath Qua Pieth Ton, one of the "Four Kings." X.
    [Show full text]
  • Martial Arts of the Middle Age
    IQP JLS-0072 Martial Arts of the Middle Age Interactive Qualifying Project Report Submitted to the Faculty of the Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation by Andrew Aveyard ___________________ Jason Cardwell ___________________ Brad Davison ___________________ Daniel Haggerty ___________________ May 6, 2014 _______________________________ Professor Jeffrey L. Forgeng, Advisor 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 5 History of European Martial Arts ................................................................................................................ 10 Medieval Time Period ............................................................................................................................. 10 Environment of the Medieval Age ...................................................................................................... 10 Knightly Combat .................................................................................................................................. 12 Masters and their Manuscripts
    [Show full text]