Volume I 2017

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Volume I 2017 14 15 16 28 29 30 17 18 19 31 32 33 20 21 22 23 34 35 36 24 25 26 27 37 38 39 Darryl Dewberry, ASPA Board Member Nelson Sanchez, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Zemmie Murray, Richard Murray & Co. Jeremy Headley, Parker Towing Edith Louden, Geotechnical Engineering Alvin Hope, ASPA Board Member 14 Angus Cooper, III, Cooper/T. Smith 18 Jimmy Lyons, ASPA Director & CEO 23 John Williams, Mobile City Council 28 George Nelson, Parker Towing 33 Testing Inc. 37 Rep. James Buskey, Alabama House of Joe McCarty, ASPA Board Member Bubba Poiroux, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Clint Carpenter, Standard Furniture Curt Doyle, Geotechnical Engineering Representatives Janet Fordham Testing Inc. Donald Bell, Mobile Housing Board 24 15 Jeff Mynatt, Seacliff Agency Andrew Filliater Al Fordham, Leaf River Cellulose LLC 29 Ray Jones, Tradelanes J.T. Smith, Glovis USA Bob Harris, ASPA 19 Tom Adger, Tri-State Maritime Anna Ward, ASPA Todd Jones, ASPA 38 Monica Bertolino Nelson Sanchez, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Kevin Filliater, Norton Lilly Logistics Bill Inge, ASPA Ritchie Macpherson, Seacliff Agency John Norton, Paul A. Boulo Bubba Poiroux, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers Michelle Turner, Inchcape Shipping Services 34 Andres Aviles, Southern Intermodal Xpress Larry Torbert, Omni Maritime David Barr, ASPA Kenny Hirsch, CSA 30 Ramona Merritt, Canfor Tim Otzenberger, Lenzing Fibers Suzanne Torbert, Omni Maritime 20 25 16 Johnny Murray, Cooper/T. Smith Dana Haymaker, APM Terminals Julie Withers Tom Leatherbury, CSA Christopher Watkins, Point Logistics Pharr Hume, Willis of Alabama Mike Russell, TASD Joe Withers, Biehl & Co. Josie Mock, Inchcape Shipping Services 39 Denson White, APM Terminals Mark Moran, Drummond Coal Tracy Mock, Atlas Ship Supply 35 Judy Adams, ASPA Jeff Uhl, Miller Transporters Inc. Jennifer Moran Rashard Howard, CSX Matt Sparks, SSA Gulf Larry Wettermark, Galloway, Wettermark, Brad Binning, Miller Transporters Inc. 21 26 Laura Huckabee Derrick Turner, Alabama Career Center Doug French, AST 31 Zemmie Murray, Richard Murray & Co. Everest, Rutens LLC Steven Tapscott, Miller Transporters Inc. Terah Huckabee, Parker Towing Johnny Murray, Cooper/T. Smith Beth Marietta Lyons, The Lyons Firm Larry Downs, ASPA Polly Wilkins, ASPA Alvin Hope, ASPA Board Member Nancy Wettermark George Talbot, City of Mobile 22 Linda Downs 27 Austin St. Clair, APM Terminals Parrish Lawler, ASPA 17 Fred Rendfrey, Downtown Mobile Alliance Bob Galloway Maria Moller, APM Terminals 36 Debbie Simpson, AkzoNobel Leigh Rendfrey, JJPR Bruner Binion, Regions Bank 32 David Vella, Richard Murray & Co. Mike Lee, Page & Jones Bestor Ward, III, ASPA Board Member Ralph Amos, Southern Intermodal Xpress Ann McCool, Arcelor Mittal Marcia Amos Martin Cunningham, N.D. Cunningham 8 ALABAMA SEAPORT • 2017 VOL. I ALABAMA SEAPORT • 2017 VOL. I 9 or steaming from Havana. Nassau may have been the busiest of the way points for blockade-runners, but at least one of the men who sailed from several of the island jumping off points deemed Havana as the nicest. Thomas E. Taylor, British supercargo in a number of blockade- runners, reported that the Cuban city was then in its heyday and the most beautiful city in the West Indies. It was also costly, a result of the huge profits being made on illegal shipments. “… I should think that at the time [Havana] was one of the most if not the most expensive city in the world to live in,” Taylor wrote, adding, “Havana RUNNING THE BLOCKADE AT MOBILE appeared like Paradise; good hotels and casinos, a capital theatre, magnificent equipages, military bands, handsome women…” One of the favorite locales in Havana was the Louvre, a large café considered neutral territory where Yankees, Southerners, U.S. Navy personnel and blockade-runners could gather and talk over coffee. While specially built, low-slung steamers were favored for East Coast runs, most Gulf Coast blockaders » Cotton on the wharves at Mobile, Ala. The South depended preferred shallow draft centerboard schooners that on exporting cotton in return not only for arms and could elude pursuing blockaders by slipping over sand ammunition but daily essentials and luxury items. bars and into bays and inlets where the warships could not follow. Situated at the head of Mobile Bay, the port’s Confederate schooners in the Gulf, as well as the Mexican upper anchorage was only dredged to a depth of 12 schooner BRILLIANT, laden with a cargo of flour. feet. The lower anchorage, where most commercial ships gathered, could accommodate ships with drafts of By the end of July, the Navy had organized three between 18 to 20 feet. This anchorage lay only five miles commands to blockade Southern ports: the North north of Mobile Point, main entrance to the bay. The ship Atlantic Blockading Squadron, the South Atlantic channel measured only a half mile wide at its narrowest Blockading Squadron and the Gulf Blockading Squadron point, with the northern end of the channel protected (which would be divided into the West Gulf and East Gulf by the guns of Ft. Morgan on the Eastern Shore and the squadrons in January 1862). more distant Ft. Gaines on Dauphin Island. Because the forts were some five miles from the mouth of the bay, a The potential impact of a blockade was readily apparent. smaller blockading force typically was assigned to guard If it were going to be placed on a successful war footing, the approach to the city. Early in the course of the war, a the Confederacy required arms and other and war single ship was assigned blockade duty off Mobile, which materiél—and its citizens still demanded luxury items— ship could be found patrolling some eight or 10 miles just as the industrialized England depended on the South from the bar. » A long-established trade port with Mobile, Havana served as the primary way point for blockade-runners calling on ports on the for cotton and other raw materials. Few things motivate Gulf of Mexico. as strongly as profit, and the lure of large returns on As blockade-runners typically were not armed, they investment resulted in a blockade-running business had to rely on stealth, speed or shallow draft to escape almost immediately. Fortunes could be made almost capture. If blockaders could get within firing distance istorians argue over the implications of President So, despite the April announcement, it was a good six overnight by successful blockade-runners. Blockade of their guns, they often were able to take their prizes Abraham Lincoln’s announcement on April 19, weeks before any semblance of blockade came into running consortiums paid 500 to 1,000 percent without incident, as when the USS WATER WITCH H1861, of a blockade of Southern ports by U.S. Navy being, with one or two ships beginning to take up station dividends. Salt that sold for $7.50 per ton in Nassau captured the British blockade-runner CORNUCOPIA warships. A blockade, some historians insist, can only be off the major Southern ports from Virginia to Louisiana. commanded $1,700 per ton in Richmond, while coffee off Mobile on Nov. 13. Two months later, the USS R.R. enforced against the ports of an enemy nation; while a Ships’ captains provided notices of varying formality that sold for $240 a ton in Nassau could fetch $5,500 CUYLER was not as fortunate. Patrolling the eastern nation itself merely closes its own ports during a time to the ports and began warning off neutral ships as a ton in the Confederate capital. Three way points for approaches to Mobile, the CUYLER sighted a blockade- of emergency, the implication being that President they approached. It was not until May 26 that Lt. David blockade-runners were quickly established: Nassau runner, the schooner J.W. WILDER, at anchor some 15 Lincoln, whether knowingly or unwittingly, recognized Dixon Porter, commanding officer of USS POWHATAN, and Bermuda for East Coast ports, and Havana for Gulf miles east of the bay. As the CUYLER approached, the the Confederacy as a separate nation by declaring a informed Mobile that a blockade of the so-called “Gem of ports (Matamoras, Mexico, gained importance later as a WILDER got underway and made for the shore, where blockade. Whatever the case, U.S. Navy historian James the Gulf” was then in effect, even though that same ship launching point for blockade-runners). Cotton that sold her crew beached and abandoned her. The CUYLER R. Soley points out that a blockade by notification is had stopped suspect vessels near Pensacola as early as for eight cents a pound in Wilmington sold for 50 cents a could not approach in the shallow water, but Lt. Francis not a blockade de facto. Fifty-three percent of the May 7 and blockading forces captured the Confederate p o un d in Live rp o ol . Th e p rofit s we re s tagg e ring . C o m m o n Winslow anchored and dispatched a boat to capture the ships listed in the Naval Register of 1861 were unfit for vessels DICK KEYES and LEWIS off Mobile on the same sailors in the blockade-runners earned as much as $250 grounded blockade-runner. The crew of the blockade- service or marked for decommissioning. Of the Navy’s 42 date. New Orleans and Pensacola were the other Gulf per round trip (compared to the $18 per month paid to runner began firing on the boat from the dunes, and men operational ships, more than half were obsolete. Twenty- ports initially included in the blockade. Galveston was U.S. and Confederate sailors in government service). aboard the CUYLER fired back, eventually lobbing a few eight ships were abroad, and all five of the service’s added later.
Recommended publications
  • The Confederate Blockade Runner Denbigh MEMBERSHIP J
    The INA Quarterly , ,, , ,; J , ,,, , , ............, ,<" , .:; , , ,, , , ," , , ,, A, Volume 26 No. 2 Summer 1999 3 The Confederate Blockade Runner Denbigh MEMBERSHIP J. Brzrf~lArtlcrld 111, Andy Hall, Tom Oertling, and Institute of Nautical Archaeology Christine A. Powell P.O. Drawer HG College Station, TX 77841-5137 13 St. Michael and the Port Royal Weights C. Wayne Smith Learn firsthand of the latest discov- eries in nautical archaeology. Mem- 16 In the Field be rs receive the INA Quarterly and other benefits (see INA Quarterly =.I, 27. 18 Review: The Alnbamn and the Kearsarge: Researcher (students only) .....$5 The Sailor's Cinil War Seafarer. ................. $40-99 by William Marvel Surveyor .............. $10&249 Mark A. Feulner Diver ................... $250449 Restorer ................ $50&999 Curator ...........$1,000-$2,499 19 In Memoriam: Excavator ........... $2,500-4,949 Charles Olin Mc Whirter Archaeologist: ......$5,00&9,999 Navigator .......... $10,000-24,999 Anchor ..........$25,000 and over Checks in U.S.currency should be made On the cover: A paintlng shows the Confederate blockade runner payable to INA. Thr portionof any dr~ Dcnbigh, which sank in Galvestan Bay six weeks after Robert E. nation in excess of $lC.00 is a tax-de- Lee's Army of Northern Virginia surrendered in 1865. Courtesy ductible, char-tabl contribution. Charles Peery. 0August 1999 by the Institute of Nautical Archamlogy. All rights resenred. INA welcomes requests !o reprint LNA Quarterly articles and iliustrations. hrb:des for publication should be submitted in hard copy and on a 3.25 diskette (Macintosh, m,ur Windows format acceptable) ~l~ngwith .dl artwork. Please address all requests and submissions to the Ed~tor,INA Quarterly, P.0.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix As Too Inclusive
    Color profile: Disabled Composite Default screen Appendix I A Chronological List of Cases Involving the Landing of United States Forces to Protect the Lives and Property of Nationals Abroad Prior to World War II* This Appendix contains a chronological list of pre-World War II cases in which the United States landed troops in foreign countries to pro- tect the lives and property of its nationals.1 Inclusion of a case does not nec- essarily imply that the exercise of forcible self-help was motivated solely, or even primarily, out of concern for US nationals.2 In many instances there is room for disagreement as to what motive predominated, but in all cases in- cluded herein the US forces involved afforded some measure of protection to US nationals or their property. The cases are listed according to the date of the first use of US forces. A case is included only where there was an actual physical landing to protect nationals who were the subject of, or were threatened by, immediate or po- tential danger. Thus, for example, cases involving the landing of troops to punish past transgressions, or for the ostensible purpose of protecting na- tionals at some remote time in the future, have been omitted. While an ef- fort to isolate individual fact situations has been made, there are a good number of situations involving multiple landings closely related in time or context which, for the sake of convenience, have been treated herein as sin- gle episodes. The list of cases is based primarily upon the sources cited following this paragraph.
    [Show full text]
  • SEAFARING WOMEN: an Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships
    SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships by R. Laurel Seaborn April, 2014 Director of Thesis/Dissertation: Dr. Lynn Harris Major Department: Department of History, Program in Maritime Studies ABSTRACT During the 19th century, women went to sea on sailing ships. Wives and family accompanied captains on their voyages from New England. They wrote journals and letters that detailed their life on board, adventures in foreign ports, and feelings of separation from family left behind. Although the women kept separate from the sailors as class and social status dictated, they contributed as nannies, nurses and navigators when required. Examination of the historical documents, ship cabin plans, and photos of those interiors, as well as looking at surviving ships, such as the whaleship Charles W. Morgan, provided evidence of the objects women brought and used on board. The investigation from a gendered perspective of the extant material culture, and shipwreck site reports laid the groundwork for finding potential archaeological diagnostics of women living on board. SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships A Thesis/Dissertation Presented To the Faculty of the Department of Department Name Here East Carolina University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts by R. Laurel Seaborn April, 2014 © R. Laurel Seaborn, 2014 SEAFARING WOMEN: An Investigation of Material Culture for Potential Archaeological Diagnostics of Women on Nineteenth-Century Sailing Ships by R. Laurel Seaborn APPROVED BY: DIRECTOR OF THESIS:_________________________________________________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • John Dahlgren the Plymouth Rifle
    JOHN DAHLGREN And THE PLYMOUTH RIFLE Marc Gorelick, VGCA The author thanks Tim Prince of College Hill Arsenal (www.collegehillarsenal.com) and Cliff Sophia of CS Arms (www.csarms.com) for the use of their photographs. Few Americans today know who John Dahlgren was, or the role he played in the Civil War. Most Civil War and navy history buffs who recognize his name identify him as a Union Admiral and ordnance expert who developed a number of naval cannon. Indeed, for his achievements in developing naval cannon he became known as the “father of American naval ordnance.” But to the gun collecting community Dahlgren was also a small arms expert and the inventor of the unique Plymouth Rifle. Photo courtesy Tim Prince, College Hill Arsenal, www.collegehillarsenal.com DAHLGREN’S NAVY CAREER John Adolphus Bernard Dahlgren was born on November 13, 1809 in Philadelphia, the son of Bernhard Ulrik Dahlgren, the Swedish Consul in Philadelphia. Like another Swedish-American, John Ericsson, the inventor of the screw propeller, turret and ironclad monitor, Dahlgren was to have a profound effect on the U.S. Navy. Dahlgren joined the United States Navy in 1826 as a midshipman. He served in the U.S. Coastal Survey from 1834 to 1837 where he developed his talents for mathematics and scientific theory. He was promoted to lieutenant, and after a number of cruises was assigned as an ordnance officer at the Washington Navy Yard in 1847. Dahlgren was in his element as an ordnance officer. He excelled as a brilliant engineer and was soon given more and more responsibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Playbookv4.Pdf
    Iron & Oak IRON & OAK Play Book Table of Contents Scenario Format ........................................................................................................................................2 Scenario 1: Two Times is the Charm – June or November 1861 .............................................................4 Scenario 2: Hampton Roads – March 1862 ..............................................................................................5 Scenario 3a: Vicksburg Blockade – July 1862 .........................................................................................6 Scenario 3b: The Bluffs – July 1862.........................................................................................................7 Scenario 3c: Fate of CSS Arkansas – July 1862.......................................................................................8 Scenario 4: Phantom – January 1863........................................................................................................9 Scenario 5: New Carthage – February 1863 ...........................................................................................11 Scenario 6: Wassaw Sound – June 1863.................................................................................................12 Scenario 7: Battle of Plymouth – April 1864..........................................................................................13 Scenario 8: Duel – June 1864..................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 21 Spring 2019 Issue 1
    Challenger News Vol. 21 Spring 2019 Issue 1 1 - Cover : The Grafham Grand Prix 2 - Editor’s Page by Richard Johnson 3 - Club Newslines 4 - Executive Matters 5 - Burghfield 6 - The Story of the New Rig 7 - The New Sail 8 - The New Mast and Boom 9 - The Bosun Talks Maintenance 10- Notices of Race 11- Challenger National Rankings 12- Back : 2019 Regatta Programme 2019 could be a life-changing year for the and help it to maintain its shape and longevity. Challenger because, like it or not, we are going Materials have also been revolutionised by the to have a new rig. As you will read on Pages 6-8, development of “film” materials such as Mylar, that current manufacturers have stopped production will hold their shape without sag and are lighter and - worse - nobody is taking over from them. than the traditional white Dacron. This is both a threat and an opportunity because All of this needs to be considered and it’s not the current rig was designed before 1980, when easy to find suitable suppliers that will serve us for the first Challenger was delivered, At the time, the the long term. We had very short notice of both the mast and boom looked very modern and did the job sailmaker and mast maker stopping production, well. The same goes for the sail which, unusually both at almost the same time, so it takes a while for the time, was fully battened and had a sloping to formulate a new policy, do the research, narrow foot to miss the sailor’s head but it also gives us it down to a core of suitable contenders and then more control than boats with horizontal booms and talk to them about the needs of our Members.
    [Show full text]
  • Open Passage Ethno-Archaeology of Skin Boats and Indigeneous
    University of Southampton Research Repository Copyright © and Moral Rights for this thesis and, where applicable, any accompanying data are retained by the author and/or other copyright owners. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis and the accompanying data cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the copyright holder/s. The content of the thesis and accompanying research data (where applicable) must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holder/s. When referring to this thesis and any accompanying data, full bibliographic details must be given, e.g. Thesis: Author (Year of Submission) "Full thesis title", University of Southampton, name of the University Faculty or School or Department, PhD Thesis, pagination. Data: Author (Year) Title. URI [dataset] UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Centre for Maritime Archaeology OPEN PASSAGE: ETHNO-ARCHAEOLOGY OF SKIN BOATS AND INDIGENEOUS MARITIME MOBILITY OF NORTH-AMERICAN ARCTIC by Evguenia V. Anichtchenko Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2016 UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON ABSTRACT FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Archaeology Thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy OPEN PASSAGE: ETHNO-ARCHAEOLOGY OF SKIN BOATS AND INDIGENEOUS MARITIME MOBILITY OF NORTH-AMERICAN ARCTIC Evguenia V. Anichtchenko This thesis is an examination of prehistoric maritime mobility in the Arctic regions of North America through the ethno-archaeological analysis of skin boats. Covering over 100,000 km of coastline, the skin boat traditions of the Arctic and Subarctic zones are arguably among the most expansive watercraft technologies in the world, dating back at least 10,000 years.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey's Medal of Honor Recipients in the Civil War
    NEW JERSEY’S MEDAL OF HONOR RECIPIENTS IN THE CIVIL WAR 1861-1865 By Michael R. Horgan, LTC William H. Kale, USA (Ret), and Joseph Francis Seliga 1 Preface This booklet is a compilation of the panels prepared for an exhibit at the General James A. Garfield Camp No. 4, Sons of Union Veterans of the Civil War Museum to commemorate the Sesquicentennial of the Civil War. This museum is co-located with the National Guard Militia Museum of New Jersey in the Armory at 151 Eggerts Crossing Road, Lawrenceville, NJ. Volunteers who work in both museums prepared the exhibit over the past year. The exhibit opened on May 23, 2011, the 150th anniversary of the New Jersey Brigade’s crossing over the Potomac River into the Confederacy on that date in 1861. The two museums are open on Tuesdays and Fridays from 9:30 am to 3:00 pm. Group tours may be scheduled for other hours by leaving a message for the Museum Curator at (609) 530-6802. He will return your call and arrange the tour. Denise Rogers, a former Rider University student intern at the Militia Museum, and Charles W. Cahilly II, a member and Past Commander of the General James A. Garfield Camp No. 4, assisted with research in the preparation of this exhibit. Cover Picture: Medal of Honor awarded to Sergeant William Porter, 1st New Jersey Cavalry Regiment. Photo courtesy of Bob MacAvoy. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM PAGE NO. Title Page 1 Preface 2 Table of Contents 3 The Medal of Honor in the Civil War 4 New Jersey's Civil War Medal of Honor Recipients 5-6 Earning the Medal of Honor 7-8 Counting Medals of Honor 9 Terminology 10-13 The Army Medal of Honor 84 The Navy Medal of Honor 85 Blank Page 86 3 The Medal of Honor in the Civil War An Act of Congress in 1861 established the Medal of Honor to “promote efficiency in the Navy.” President Abraham Lincoln signed it into law on December 21, 1861.
    [Show full text]
  • AUM Historical Review
    AUM Historical Review AUM Historical Review # 2, Winter 2013 Editor Graydon Rust Associate Editors Ryan Blocker Kelhi DePace Jennifer Kellum Katelyn Kidd Tracy Bruce Wilson Graphic Designers Samuel Blakely Alex Trott (cover) Advisor Steven Gish Photographs Alabama Department of Archives and History Historical Marker Database (HMdb.org) Library of Congress National Park Service Ryan Blocker Tim and Renda Carr Graydon Rust Roy Smith Printing Wells Printing, Montgomery, AL © 2013, AUM Historical Review Published by the Chi Psi Chapter of the Phi Alpha Theta History Honor Society Auburn University at Montgomery, P.O. Box 244023, Montgomery, AL 36124-4023 The ideas expressed in these essays are the sole responsibility of their respective authors and contributors and do not necessarily represent the official statements, opinions, or policies of Auburn University at Montgomery or the Department of History at AUM. Neither Auburn University at Montgomery nor the Department of History at AUM accept any liability for the content of this journal. 1 AUM Historical Review Contents Editor’s Note Graydon Rust 4 Education during Slavery: What Slaves Really Learned Tracy Bruce Wilson 5 From Replacement Limbs to Special Taxes: Alabama’s Confederate Pension System, Slaves in South Carolina 1867-1891 Graydon Rust 15 Politics and Rehabilitation: Governor George Wallace and His Physical Therapist at the 1972 Democratic National Convention Tracy Bruce Wilson 25 The C.S.S. Tennessee at the Battle of Mobile Bay Brian Wesley 37 Gov.Wallace en route to the 1972 A Conversation with Dr. Keith Krawczynski Democratic Convention Katelyn Kidd 57 A Review of The Rape of Nanking by Iris Chang Mary Henderson Fukai 61 Additional contributors 65 Call for papers 65 The C.S.S.
    [Show full text]
  • GAR Posts in PA
    Grand Army of the Republic Posts - Historical Summary National GAR Records Program - Historical Summary of Grand Army of the Republic (GAR) Posts by State PENNSYLVANIA Prepared by the National Organization SONS OF UNION VETERANS OF THE CIVIL WAR INCORPORATED BY ACT OF CONGRESS No. Alt. Post Name Location County Dept. Post Namesake Meeting Place(s) Organized Last Mentioned Notes Source(s) No. PLEASE NOTE: The GAR Post History section is a work in progress (begun 2013). More data will be added at a future date. 000 (Department) N/A N/A PA Org. 16 January Dis. 1947 Provisional Department organized 22 November 1866. Permanent Beath, 1889; Carnahan, 1893; 1867 Department 16 January 1867 with 19 Posts. The Department National Encampment closed in 1947, and its remaining members were transferred to "at Proceedings, 1948 large" status. 001 GEN George G. Meade Philadelphia Philadelphia PA MG George Gordon Meade (1815- Wetherill House, Sansom Street Chart'd 16 Oct. Originally chartered by National HQ. It was first commanded by Beath, 1889; History of the 1872), famous Civil War leader. above Sixth (1866); Home Labor 1866; Must'd 17 COL McMichael. Its seniority was challenged by other Posts George G. Meade Post No. League Rooms, 114 South Third Oct. 1866 named No. 1 in Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. It was found to be One, 1889; Philadelphia in the Street (1866-67); NE cor. Broad the ranking Post in the Department and retained its name as Post Civil War, 1913 and Arch Streets (1867); NE cor. No. 1. It adopted George G. Meade as its namesake on 8 Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • The Muse Newsletter of the Slater Memorial Museum Summer 2010
    The Muse Newsletter of the Slater Memorial Museum Summer 2010 Maritime Norwich century), brigs were seen as fast and maneuverable The first in a series on the city’s and were used as both naval war ships and merchant illustrious seafaring history. ships. They were especially popular in the 18th and early 19th centuries. Brigs fell out of use with the Many thanks to Diane Norman, the Norwich Historical Society and the Connecticut Humanities Council for arrival of the steamship because they required a research and financial support for the Norwich Heritage relatively large crew for their small size and were Partnership which led to this article. difficult to sail into the wind. Brigs should not to be confused with brigantines which are rigged The Slater Museum’s efforts to uncover and deploy differently. A brig is usually built on a larger scale the remarkable collections of fine and decorative art than the schooner, and often is nearly as large as and artifacts held at several Norwich institutions to the full-sized, three-masted ship. Brigs vary in interpret and present the city’s history must include an length between 75 and 165 ft with tonnages up to examination of the Winship clan, of which Raymond 480. Historically most brigs were made of wood, Baily Case (1889-1980) was a member. Mr. Case although some later brigs were built with hulls and left objects to the Slater Museum from the Winships masts of steel or iron. that tell the story of Norwich’s seafaring age. Many NFA alumni remember “Chief” Case, as he was Brigs were used as small warships carrying affectionately called, as a science and math teacher.
    [Show full text]
  • Wreck of the St. Peter (1874) – National Register of Historic Places
    Proposal to the National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Sanctuary Program 2017 Wreck of the St. Peter (1874) – National Register of Historic Places 0 Section I – Basics Nomination Title: The Great Lake Ontario National Marine Sanctuary Nominator Names(s) & Affiliations(s): Andrew Cuomo, Governor of New York; Kevin Gardner, Chairman of the Oswego County Legislature; Scott Gray, Chairman of the Jefferson County Legislature; Keith Batman, Chairman of the Cayuga County Legislature; Steve LeRoy, Chairman of the Wayne County Board of Supervisors; and William Barlow, Mayor of the City of Oswego. Point of Contact: Philip Church, Oswego County Administrator, Chairman of Great Lake Ontario National Marine Sanctuary Nomination Task Force; 46 East Bridge Street, Oswego 13126; phone 315-349-8235, fax 315-349-8237, e-mail [email protected] Section II – Introduction Narrative Description: The proposed Great Lake Ontario National Marine Sanctuary includes unique and significant submerged cultural resources within a corridor that is one of the most historically significant regions in the Great Lakes and the North American continent. Located in the southeastern and eastern quadrant of Lake Ontario, this area and its tributaries provided food and transportation trade routes for indigenous peoples and early European explorers, such as Samuel de Champlain. During the colonial period, it was a strategic theater of conflict among European powers and the young American republic. Military actions involving naval and land forces occurred at Sodus, Oswego, Big Sandy Creek, and Sackets Harbor during the French and Indian War, Revolutionary War and the War of 1812. These actions involved historic figures such as the Marquis de Montcalm, Sir William Johnson, Commodore Isaac Chauncey and Sir James Yeo.
    [Show full text]