DOCSLIB.ORG

Prevalence of Coxiella Burnetii Seropositivity and Shedding in Farm, Pet and Feral Cats and Associated Risk Factors in Farm Cats

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Prevalence of Coxiella Burnetii Seropositivity and Shedding in Farm, Pet and Feral Cats and Associated Risk Factors in Farm Cats Epidemiology and Infection Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding in farm, pet and feral cats and cambridge.org/hyg associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada Original Paper 1 1,2 1,2 1,2 1,3 Cite this article: Cyr J et al (2021). Prevalence J. Cyr , M.-È. Turcotte , A. Desrosiers , D. Bélanger , J. Harel , of Coxiella burnetii seropositivity and shedding D. Tremblay4, A. Leboeuf5, C. A. Gagnon3,4, J.-C. Côté1 and J. Arsenault1,2,3 in farm, pet and feral cats and associated risk factors in farm cats in Quebec, Canada. 1 2 Epidemiology and Infection 149,e57,1–9. Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada; Groupe de Recherche en https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000364 Épidémiologie des Zoonoses et Santé Publique (GREZOSP), Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada; 3Faculté de médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Swine and poultry infectious diseases research center Received: 8 October 2020 (CRIPA) – Fonds de Recherche du Québec, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada; 4Service de diagnostic, Faculté de Revised: 13 January 2021 médecine vétérinaire, Université de Montréal, Saint-Hyacinthe, QC, Canada and 5Ministère de l’Agriculture, Accepted: 2 February 2021 des Pêcheries et de l’Alimentation du Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada Key words: cats; Coxiella burnetii; prevalence; risk factors Abstract Author for correspondence: Cats represent a potential source of Coxiella burnetii, the aetiological agent of Q fever in Julie Arsenault, humans. The prevalence and risk factors of C. burnetii infection in farm, pet and feral cats E-mail: [email protected] were studied in Quebec, Canada, using a cross-sectional study. Serum samples were tested using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for the presence of antibodies against C. burnetii, whereas rectal swabs were assayed using real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) for the molecular detection of the bacteria. Potential risk factors for farm cats were investigated using clinical examinations, questionnaires and results from a con- current study on C. burnetii farm status. A total of 184 cats were tested: 59 from ruminant farms, 73 pets and 52 feral cats. Among farm cats, 2/59 (3.4%) were ELISA-positive, 3/59 (5.1%) were ELISA-doubtful and 1/59 (1.7%) was qPCR-positive. All pets and feral cats were negative to C. burnetii ELISA and qPCR. Farm cat positivity was associated with a posi- tive C. burnetii status on the ruminant farm (prevalence ratio = 7.6, P = 0.03). Our results sug- gest that although pet and feral cats do not seem to pose a great C. burnetii risk to public health, more active care should be taken when in contact with cats from ruminant farms. Introduction Q fever is a zoonotic disease caused by Coxiella burnetii, an obligate intracellular, Gram-negative bacterium [1]. Human Q fever has been documented in many parts of the world [2]. The bacteria can infect a wide range of hosts, including domestic cattle, sheep and goats, companion animals, cats and dogs and several vertebrate and invertebrate wildlife species [1, 3, 4]. Experimental findings have shown that a single bacterium could initiate infec- tion in humans [5]. Although most human infection cases remain asymptomatic or develop flu-like symptoms, fever, myalgia and/or headache, serious acute Q fever may lead to abortion, pneumonia, hepatitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, endocarditis and meningitis, and may further develop into persistent infection [1]. The most common mode of transmission to humans is airborne by inhalation of aerosol particles contaminated with parturient secretions from infected animals [6]. Coxiella burnetii is resistant to drying and can survive in the soil for several weeks [7]. Although human infec- tions have historically been mostly associated with close contact with domestic ruminants [1, 8], cats that live in close proximity to humans are regarded as a potential source of C. burnetii [9–11]. Many studies reported the detection of antibodies against phase I and/or phase II C. burnetii antigens in cat sera [12–15], and some cases of human Q fever were linked with © The Author(s), 2021. Published by exposure to parturient cats [16–19]. Although little is known on the main sources of infection Cambridge University Press. This is an Open in cats, it has been proposed that cats may become infected by consumption of placenta or Access article, distributed under the terms of milk from infected ruminants, consumption of contaminated raw meat intended for pet con- the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), sumption, inhalation from environmental contamination, ingestion of infected prey, or tick which permits unrestricted re-use, bites [3, 20, 21]. Considering evidence supporting that rats could be involved as reservoirs distribution, and reproduction in any medium, for C. burnetii, they could maintain the bacterial infection in preying cats [22]. Some studies provided the original work is properly cited. reported inconsistent differences in the prevalence of C. burnetii infection between client-owned and shelter or stray cats [9, 10, 12]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has been conducted to evaluate the risk of C. burnetii infection in farm cats, which may be more likely to be exposed owing to their close contact with domestic ruminants. In addition, although some studies confirmed the presence of C. burnetii in the reproductive system of Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 170.106.35.93, on 02 Oct 2021 at 15:44:32, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0950268821000364 2 J. Cyr et al. female cats [10, 11], no study that we know of has used PCR to these areas, clinics were randomly selected and invited to partici- screen cat faeces for the presence and shedding of the bacteria. pate in our study until two clinics by region were recruited. Each The purpose of this study was two-fold: (1) to estimate the clinic was asked to recruit a target of 10 cats. Cats were chosen at prevalence of C. burnetii seropositivity and faecal shedding in each clinic by their respective staff following specific inclusion cats living on farms, in pet cats from households and in feral criteria: (1) the cat was 12 weeks of age or older, (2) the owner cats from an urban environment, and (2) to identify risk factors lived in the MRC as the clinic location, (3) the owner was fluent associated with seropositivity and/or shedding of C. burnetii. in French and (4) the owner provided informed written consent for participation. At the beginning of the study, two additional criteria were used: (1) the cat belonged to the same owner since Methods 2 months of age or younger, and (2) the owner did not move to a new dwelling since owning the cat. However, due to difficul- Study design and cat selection ties in recruiting cats meeting all inclusion criteria, these two cri- A cross-sectional study was performed in 2011 in three regions teria were discarded as they were not expected to be associated (Rimouski-Neigette/La Mitis, Les Maskoutains, Montreal) with cat exposure status, but were rather initially used to allow encompassing four regional county municipalities (MRC), for a lifelong appraisal of the potential risk factors, which was which are administrative areas used in Quebec, Canada then revised to only consider exposures over the last 6 months. (Supplementary Fig. S1). The first two regions included the Sampling was extended to the summer of 2012 to reach the sam- MRC of Rimouski-Neigette and Les Maskoutains, respectively. ple size. Only one cat per client was included in the study. They were mostly rural and were selected for the farm and pet A financial compensation of 20$CAN per sampled cat was cat samplings as part of a concurrent study on C. burnetii in provided to the veterinary clinics. ruminants [23]. Besides, another MRC adjacent to All feral cats were taken from the Montreal region. They were Rimouski-Neigette, ‘La Mitis’, was added for pet cat sampling street cats living in outdoor colonies and caught within the in this region. The MRC of Montreal, which is the largest ‘Trap-Neuter-Release-Maintain Program’ of the Montreal div- urban area in Quebec, Canada, was also included for pet cat sam- ision of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals pling and to investigate whether feral cats could represent a source (SPCA). This programme consists of trapping, sterilising, vaccin- of C. burnetii infection in a densely populated city. ation and deworming stray and feral cats and returning them to The selection of cats was based on three distinct categories: farm their colony. Cats were caught using TRU-CATCH© traps (Belle cats, pet cats and feral cats. The target sample size was calculated to Fourche, SD, USA) with food bait under the surveillance of volun- include at least 60 cats per category from a combination of all teers. No financial compensation was given to the SPCA, except regions. This number was estimated using an online calculator that SNAP Feline Triple Tests (IDEXX, Westbrook, ME, USA) [24] to allow the detection of at least one C. burnetii-enzyme-linked were provided to their veterinarian for screening cats for feline immunosorbent assay (ELISA)- or -quantitative polymerase chain immunodeficiency virus (FIV), feline leukaemia virus (FeLV) reaction (qPCR)-positive cat with a confidence level of 95%, assum- and feline heartworm infection. ing a prevalence of at least 5% in each cat category. This approach was chosen given (1) the absence of prior information on the Cat sampling and physical examination expected apparent prevalence in this specific population, (2) the absence of prior information on the diagnostic performance of All farm cat sampling was performed by the research team.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Feral and Free Ranging Domestic Cats
    No. 306 THE WILDLIFER Page 57 FERAL AND FREE-RANGING DOMESTIC CATS Position Statement Free and free-ranging domestic cats are exotic species to North America. Exotic species are recognized as one of the most widespread and serious threats to the integrity of native wildlife populations and natural ecosystems. Exotic species present special challenges for wildlife managers because their negative impacts are poorly understood by the general public, many exotic species have become such an accepted component of the envirom- nent that many people regard them as "natural," some exotic species have advocacy groups that promote their continued presence, and few policies and laws deal directly with their control. Perhaps no issue has captured more of the challenges for contemporary wildlife management than the impacts of feral or free-ranging human companion or domestic animals. The domestic cat is the companion animal that recently has attracted the most attention for its impact on wildlife species. Domestic cats originated from an ancestral wild species, the European and African wild cat (Felis silvestris). The domestic cat (Felis catus) is now considered a separate species. The estimated numbers of pet cats in urban and rural regions of the United States have grown from 30 million in 1970 to nearly 65 million in 2000. Reliable estimates of the present total cat population are not available. Nationwide, approximately 30% of households have cats. In rural areas, approximately 60% of households have cats. The impact of domestic cats on wildlife is difficult to quantify. However, a growing body of literature strongly suggests that domestic cats are a significant factor in the mortality of small mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians.
    [Show full text]
  • Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat
    UPTEC X 12 012 Examensarbete 30 hp Juni 2012 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Molecular Biotechnology Programme Uppsala University School of Engineering UPTEC X 12 012 Date of issue 2012-06 Author Carolin Johansson Title (English) Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Title (Swedish) Abstract This study presents mitochondrial genome sequences from 22 Egyptian house cats with the aim of resolving the uncertain origin of the contemporary world-wide population of Domestic cats. Together with data from earlier studies it has been possible to confirm some of the previously suggested haplotype identifications and phylogeny of the Domestic cat lineage. Moreover, by applying a molecular clock, it is proposed that the Domestic cat lineage has experienced several expansions representing domestication and/or breeding in pre-historical and historical times, seemingly in concordance with theories of a domestication origin in the Neolithic Middle East and in Pharaonic Egypt. In addition, the present study also demonstrates the possibility of retrieving long polynucleotide sequences from hair shafts and a time-efficient way to amplify a complete feline mitochondrial genome. Keywords Feline domestication, cat in ancient Egypt, mitochondrial genome, Felis silvestris libyca Supervisors Anders Götherström Uppsala University Scientific reviewer Jan Storå Stockholm University Project name Sponsors Language Security English Classification ISSN 1401-2138 Supplementary bibliographical information Pages 123 Biology Education Centre Biomedical Center Husargatan 3 Uppsala Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala Tel +46 (0)18 4710000 Fax +46 (0)18 471 4687 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Det är inte sedan tidigare känt exakt hur, när och var tamkatten domesticerades.
    [Show full text]
  • Home Range Size, Habitat Utilisation and Movement Patterns of Suburban and Farm Cats Felis Catus
    ECOGRAPHY 20: 271-280. Copenhagen 1997 Home range size, habitat utilisation and movement patterns of suburban and farm cats Felis catus David G. Barratt Bdrratt, D G 1997 Home range size, habitat utilisation and movement patterns of suburban and farm cats Felts caius - Ecography 20 271-280 The movements of 10 house cats (4 desexed females, 5 desexed males and 1 intact male) living on the edge of a suburb adjoining grassland and forest/woodland habitat, and a neighbounng colony of seven farm cats, were examined using radio-telemetry over nine months Nocturnal home range areas of the suburban cats vaned between 0 02 and 27 93 ha (mean 7 89 ha), and were larger than diumal home range areas (range 0 02 to 17 19 ha - mean 2 73 ha) Nocturnal home range areas of cats from the farm cat colony vaned between 1 38 and 4 46 ha (mean 2 54 ha), and were also larger than diumal home range areas (range 0 77 to 3 70 ha - mean 1 70 ha) Home ranges of cats in the farm cat colony overlapped extensively, as did those of cats living at the same suburban residence There was no overlap of home ranges of female cats from different residences, and little overlap between males and females from different residences Four of the suburban house cats moved between 390 m and 900 m into habitat adjoining the suburb Polygons descnbing the home ranges of these animals were strongly spatially biased away from the suburban environment, though the cats spent the majonty of their time within the bounds of the suburb Movements further than 100-200 m beyond the suburb edge were
    [Show full text]
  • Missing Cats, Stray Coyotes: One Citizen’S Perspective
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for 4-1-2007 MISSING CATS, STRAY COYOTES: ONE CITIZEN’S PERSPECTIVE Judith C. Webster Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Webster, Judith C., "MISSING CATS, STRAY COYOTES: ONE CITIZEN’S PERSPECTIVE" (2007). Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings. 78. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Missing Cats, Stray Coyotes: One Citizen’s Perspective * Judith C. Webster , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Abstract : The author explores the issue of urban coyotes and coyote management from a cat owner’s perspective, with specific examples from Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Following a personal encounter with two coyotes in July 2005 that led to the death of a cat, the author has delved into the history of Vancouver’s “Co-existing with Coyotes”, a government-funded program run by a non- profit ecological society. The policy’s roots in conservation biology, the environmental movement, and the human dimensions branch of wildlife management are documented. The author contends that “Co-existing with Coyotes” puts people and pets at greater risk of attack by its inadequate response to habituated coyotes, and by an educational component that misrepresents real dangers and offers unworkable advice.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Human Factors Involved in the Unwanted Cat Problem
    UNDERSTANDING HUMAN FACTORS INVOLVED IN THE UNWANTED CAT PROBLEM Sarah Jane Maria Zito BVetMed MANZCVS (feline medicine) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2015 School of Veterinary Science I Abstract The large number of unwanted cats in many modern communities results in a complex, worldwide problem causing many societal issues. These include ethical concerns about the euthanasia of many healthy animals, moral stress for the people involved, financial costs to organisations that manage unwanted cats, environmental costs, wildlife predation, potential for disease spread, community nuisance, and welfare concerns for cats. Humans contribute to the creation and maintenance of unwanted cat populations and also to solutions to alleviate the problem. The work in this thesis explored human factors contributing to the unwanted cat problem—including cat ownership perception, cat caretaking, cat semi-ownership and cat surrender—and human factors associated with cat adoption choices and outcomes. To investigate human factors contributing to the unwanted cat problem, data were collected from 141 people surrendering cats to four animal shelters. The aim was to better understand the people and human-cat relationships involved, and ultimately to inform strategies to reduce shelter intake. Participants were recruited for this study when they surrendered a cat to a shelter and information was obtained on their demographics, cat interaction history, cat caretaking, and surrender reasons. This information was used to describe and compare the people, cats, and human-cat relationships contributing to shelter intake, using logistic regression models and biplot visualisation techniques. A model of cat ownership perception in people that surrender cats to shelters was proposed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Behaviour of the Domestic Cat, Second Edition
    12 Physiological and Pathological Causes of Behavioural Change Introduction Overt behaviour is the consequence of a cat perceiving some change in its environment, evaluating this change, deciding on an appropriate response and the response being generated through the motor systems of the brain to the elements of the skeletal system that control activity. Hence, although behaviour occurs as a consequence of changes in the external environment, the responses generated also depend on internal variations in the processing of information. These processes are susceptible to alteration due not only to normal physiological variations but also to pathological changes. Interpretation of behaviour, therefore, requires an understanding of how the generation of behaviour is modulated by factors influencing the internal state, as well as how responses are generated to events in the external environment. Pathological changes can be the sole cause of behavioural change – indeed, behavioural signs such as lameness are common first indicators of disease in veterinary medicine. In some cases complex behavioural signs, such as aggressive behaviour towards an owner, can occur entirely as a consequence of pathological events, such as focal seizures. Although such events are rare, their characteristics need to be distinguished from behaviours generated in response to external stimuli when investigating the cause of undesired behaviours. However, physiological or pathological changes more commonly modify cats’ behaviour rather than solely cause it. This is through alterations in one or more of the following: (i) perception of external events; (ii) the motivation to show a response; (iii) the threshold at which a response is shown; and (iv) the manner in which a response is generated.
    [Show full text]
  • Barn Cats-Part 1
    Cats International What are Barn Cats? Generally NOT Cared For - Victims Vulnerable to People - Generally Not Well Cared For - Sickly - Work for Little Pay UNDERSTANDING WHAT BARN CATS REALLY NEED Table of contents: What Is A Barn Cat? ………………………………………………. 1-6 How to Care for A Barn Cat …………………………………… 7 If Relocation is Necessary ……………………………………… 8-13 Explained Barn Cat Behavior …………………………………. 14-16 The Barn Cat Is a Great Asset ………………………………… 17 What Is A Barn Cat? A Happy Healthy Neutered Barn Cat Every circumstance is quite the same. You buy a farm with a barn, already present are the faces of hungry cats and kittens looking to call the barn still their home. People sell or leave the farm with all animals taken except the cats. Most farm cats possess no worth to people. People seem to love the fact that cats will keep the area rodent free, still they are considered a nuisance and not cared for or wanted. They seem to just show up as soon as you turn on a light or show any sign of activity in the barn. More than likely, they have lived there before you did. Most people view the barn/farm cat as a disposable animal that has no worth. Quite the opposite, they are worth their weight in gold. They rid your barn and farm from varmints that can make your farm an unhealthy place for other animals and yourself. 1 Given the respect they deserve, spay or neutered and a clean safe environment to work from, food, water and shelter from the elements outside, they will earn and prove just how dedicated and valuable they can become to any size of barn or farm.
    [Show full text]
  • Madison County, IL Code of Ordinances
    Madison County, IL Code of Ordinances - ANIMALS Section General Provisions 50.001 Short title 50.002 Definitions 50.003 Animal Control Program Administration 50.015 Administrator 50.016 Personnel and facilities 50.017 Funding 50.018 Authorization for requiring registration 50.019 Duties 50.020 Police power; cooperation of Police Department 50.021 Causes for removal of Administrator from office 50.022 Inspections; entry 50.023 Fees for registration of dogs and cats 50.024 Fees for registration of litters Impoundment 50.040 Impoundment 50.041 Registration of impounded dogs and cats 50.042 Notice of impoundment 50.043 Redemption of impounded animal; conditions for redemption 50.044 Animals not redeemed 50.045 Release without spaying or neutering prohibited 50.046 Humane societies exempt 50.047 Payment for rabies inoculation 50.048 Notice of picking up or confining strays to pound 50.049 Dogs and cats in heat Reporting and Confinement After Biting 50.060 Confinement of animal after reported bite 50.061 Veterinarian to examine and report to Administrator 50.062 Confinement in owner’s house 50.063 Post-confinement examination of dog 50.064 Noncompliance; violations 50.065 Confinement period for animal which has bitten a person 50.066 Bite reporting and investigation 50.067 Sterilization of biting animals Vicious and Dangerous Dogs 50.080 Enforcement and authorization 50.081 Dangerous dogs 50.082 Control methods for dangerous dogs 50.083 Vicious dogs 50.084 Microchip identification of dangerous and vicious dogs 50.085 Appeals 50.086 Exemptions
    [Show full text]
  • Truth About Cats and Dogs
    Everybody wants to be a cat Bengal Cat Siberian Cat Savanah Cat Siamese Cat Sphinx Cat Russian Blue Memories Big Ear Cat . One of the most popular breeds of cat in the USA, this short-haired breed has the old name for the country where it was thought to have originated. Which fine-boned, slender, medium-sized breed of cat is this? Abyssinian Abyssinian • Although this breed was developed in Great Britain, it was given the old name for what is now Ethiopia/Abyssinia. • It was thought the breed developed from kittens brought home by returning soldiers coming from that part of the world. • There is an element of truth in the story but, it now seems that the soldiers almost certainly bought their kittens from Egyptian traders, rather than Ethiopian ones. Indeed, recent research suggests that the breed may have developed from a single cat, named Zula, bought by a soldier in Alexandria in 1868. • This breed is sometimes called a "Purebred Long-haired Siamese", since is developed as a mutation from the standard Siamese. Noted for its sapphas a light-coloured body with darker extremities. Considered the most intelligent of all long- haired breeds, which cat is this? Bengal Bengal cat • This is a rare breed of domestic cat from France. Large and muscular(called cobby) with relatively short, fine-boned limbs, and very fast reflexes. They are known for their blue (grey) water-resistant short hair double coats and orange or copper-colored eyes. They are also known for their “smile”. These cats are exceptional hunters and are highly prized by farmers.
    [Show full text]
  • North Utah Valley Animal Services: The
    NORTH UTAH VALLEY ANIMAL SERVICES SPECIAL SERVICE DISTRICT THE SCIENCE OF FERAL CATS A Research Based Report STEVE ALDER Environmental Health Bureau Director Utah County Health Department TRENT COLLEDGE Lieutenant Orem City Police Department JOSH CHRISTENSEN Lieutenant American Fork Police Department TUG GETTLING Director North Utah Valley Animal Services OWEN JACKSON Assistant City Manager Saratoga Springs CARL NIELSON Sergeant Pleasant Grove Police Department YVETTE RICE Lieutenant Utah County Sheriff’s Office 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Executive Summary………………………………………………………………………………………………………..…….3 2. Best Friends Animal Society Proposal…………………………………………………………………………………..………4 3. Statistical Comparison Brief……………………………………………………………………………………………………..5 4. Addressing Inaccurate Claims…………………………………………………………………………………………………...6 5. Scientific Excerpts by Topic of Concern………………………………………………………………………………………...8 6. Summary of Select Peer-Reviewed Scientific Literature………………………………………………………………………15 7. Subject Matter Expert Statement…………………………………………………………………………………………...…..22 8. Position Statements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………….27 9. Research-based Conclusions……………………………………………………………………………………………...……36 10. Organizations Opposed to TNR Programs………………………………………………………………………………..……37 11. References…………………………………………………………………...…………………………………. ……………..40 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The North Utah Valley Animal Services Special Service District (NUVAS) provides animal sheltering, regulation, care, control, and services for the municipalities that exist within our district
    [Show full text]
  • Surrendered Cat Information
    Animal Code # _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ _____________ Surrendered Cat Information : Roseville Resident It will cost more than $200 to provide care for this animal. As a Roseville resident, your fee to surrender your pet and to cover some of the costs for their basic care is : $35 per animal or $100 for a litter of 3 or more. (Proof of address must be provided) The care your animal could receive may include: Vaccinations Medical Tests Veterinary Medical Care Spaying or Neutering Transportation Grooming Food & Basic Care Evaluation & Assessment Possible Euthanasia In addition to the surrender fee we encourage you to consider a tax-deductible donation to help us continue to provide the utmost care for our animals. Yes- I want to donate to help provide care to the animals at the Placer SPCA. Please add an additional: __$15, __$25, __$50, __$100, or $_________ donation to the above noted fee. Surrendering Party please complete: Fee: $_____________ Donation: $_____________ (This amount is tax deductible to the extent allowed by law.) In addition to your receipt, you will receive an acknowledgment in the mail for your donation. Total: $_____________ As owner, or custodian, of the animal described herein, I hereby transfer all right and title of said animal to the Placer SPCA. I further understand and agree that it may be transported to an unaffiliated Shelter Facility at said SPCA’s discretion due to health, space, or jurisdictional issues, and/or humanely euthanized if deemed necessary. If I have indicated I would like to know either during or upon completion of the required hold period, this animal is deemed unadoptable, the Placer SPCA will reasonably attempt to notify me.
    [Show full text]
  • Overview 1CHAPTER
    Overview 1CHAPTER 1.1 Defining the Problem he mere mention of feral cats creates a storm of emotion and con- troversy for many people. Where do feral cats come from? What Tshould be done about them? What is best for them? Who is responsi- ble for them? Although the cats themselves often are at the center of the storm, feral cats are a “people problem.” They are the offspring of outdoor, intact cats—owned or abandoned. They are on farms and in cities, sub- urbs, and wilderness areas. They can be found near schools, restaurants, hospitals, barns, apartments, and abandoned buildings—anywhere there is adequate food and shelter (Mahlow and Slater 1996). Some people feed them, others provide veterinary care; some feel sorry for them but do nothing, others that believe they should be removed and destroyed. Even the veterinary profession is divided on how to view feral cats, as reflected in conflicting and often emotional letters in the Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association (Hughes 1993; DeBrito and Doffermyre 1994; Heerens 1994; Heerens 1996; Gross et al. 1996; McGrath 1996; Patronek 1996). These letters were responses to an article on controlling 1 2 Community Approaches to Feral Cats feral cats through neuter and release (Zaunbrecher and Smith 1993) and a later American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA) report on cat wel- fare and overpopulation (Kahler 1996). What is a “feral” cat? For this book, any cat who is too poorly socialized to be handled (and therefore must be trapped or sedated for examination) and who cannot be placed into a typical pet home is feral.
    [Show full text]