Understanding Human Factors Involved in the Unwanted Cat Problem
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
And Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP)
Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) and Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) VETERINARY GUIDE 10 What is Feline Coronavirus or FCoV? FCoV is a common and contagious virus which is passed in the faeces of cats. It is more commonly found in multi-cat households and does not affect other animals or people. How does a cat catch FCoV? FCoV is caught by inadvertently swallowing the virus, through contact with other cats, litter trays or soil where other cats have toileted. Exposure to faeces in the litter tray is the most common means of transmission. Forty per cent or more of cats will be infected with the virus at some time in their lives and most owners will be unaware of it. Nearly every cat that encounters the virus will become infected and most will remain healthy and the majority will clear the virus themselves. What problems does FCoV cause? Most cats do not display any sign of being infected with FCoV, although some cats get diarrhoea for a few days. These cats tend to shed the virus in their faeces for a few months and remain healthy. In a very small percentage of cats, the virus mutates and causes a fatal disease called feline infectious peritonitis (FIP). This is more likely to occur in multi-cat environments and can take weeks, months or occasionally years after the initial infection with FCoV to develop. If a cat clears FCoV and doesn’t develop FIP, is it then immune? Unfortunately not, a cat can become re-infected with FCoV again at any time and can be susceptible to it mutating and causing FIP. -
MAC1 Abstracts – Oral Presentations
Oral Presentation Abstracts OP001 Rights, Interests and Moral Standing: a critical examination of dialogue between Regan and Frey. Rebekah Humphreys Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom This paper aims to assess R. G. Frey’s analysis of Leonard Nelson’s argument (that links interests to rights). Frey argues that claims that animals have rights or interests have not been established. Frey’s contentions that animals have not been shown to have rights nor interests will be discussed in turn, but the main focus will be on Frey’s claim that animals have not been shown to have interests. One way Frey analyses this latter claim is by considering H. J. McCloskey’s denial of the claim and Tom Regan’s criticism of this denial. While Frey’s position on animal interests does not depend on McCloskey’s views, he believes that a consideration of McCloskey’s views will reveal that Nelson’s argument (linking interests to rights) has not been established as sound. My discussion (of Frey’s scrutiny of Nelson’s argument) will centre only on the dialogue between Regan and Frey in respect of McCloskey’s argument. OP002 Can Special Relations Ground the Privileged Moral Status of Humans Over Animals? Robert Jones California State University, Chico, United States Much contemporary philosophical work regarding the moral considerability of nonhuman animals involves the search for some set of characteristics or properties that nonhuman animals possess sufficient for their robust membership in the sphere of things morally considerable. The most common strategy has been to identify some set of properties intrinsic to the animals themselves. -
Feline—Aerosol Transmission
Feline—Aerosol Transmission foreign animal disease zoonotic disease Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) Aspergillus spp. Bordetella bronchiseptica Calicivirus (FCV) Canine Parvovirus 2 Chlamydophila felis Coccidioides immitis Cryptococcus neoformans Feline Distemper (Feline Panleukopenia, Feline Parvovirus) Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) Feline Viral Rhinotracheitis (FRV) Glanders (Burkholderia mallei) Hendra Virus Histoplasma capsulatum Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei) Nipah Virus Plague (Yersinia pestis) Pneumocystis carinii Q Fever (Coxiella burnetii) Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium spp.) www.cfsph.iastate.edu Feline—Oral Transmission foreign animal disease zoonotic disease Anthrax (Bacillus anthracis) Babesia spp. Botulism (Clostridium botulinum) Campylobacter jejuni Canine Parvovirus 2 Coccidiosis (Isospora spp.) Cryptosporidium parvum Escherichia coli (E. coli) Feline Coronavirus (FCoV) Feline Distemper (Feline Panleukopenia, Feline Parvovirus) Feline Immunodefi ciency Virus (FIV) Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) Feline Leukemia Virus (FeLV) Giardia spp. Glanders (Burkholderia mallei) Helicobacter pylori Hookworms (Ancylostoma spp.) Leptospirosis (Leptospira spp.) Listeria monocytogenes Melioidosis (Burkholderia pseudomallei) Pseudorabies Roundworms (Toxocara spp.) Salmonella spp. Strongyles (Strongyloides spp.) Tapeworms (Dipylidium caninum, Echinococcus spp.) Toxoplasma gondii Tuberculosis (Mycobacterium spp.) Tularemia (Francisella tularensis) Whipworms (Trichuris campanula) www.cfsph.iastate.edu -
Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2Nd Edition) Iii
ii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2nd edition) iii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice, 2nd edition Publisher: Companion Animal Group, Danish Veterinary Association, Peter Bangs Vej 30, 2000 Frederiksberg Authors of the guidelines: Lisbeth Rem Jessen (University of Copenhagen) Peter Damborg (University of Copenhagen) Anette Spohr (Evidensia Faxe Animal Hospital) Sandra Goericke-Pesch (University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover) Rebecca Langhorn (University of Copenhagen) Geoffrey Houser (University of Copenhagen) Jakob Willesen (University of Copenhagen) Mette Schjærff (University of Copenhagen) Thomas Eriksen (University of Copenhagen) Tina Møller Sørensen (University of Copenhagen) Vibeke Frøkjær Jensen (DTU-VET) Flemming Obling (Greve) Luca Guardabassi (University of Copenhagen) Reproduction of extracts from these guidelines is only permitted in accordance with the agreement between the Ministry of Education and Copy-Dan. Danish copyright law restricts all other use without written permission of the publisher. Exception is granted for short excerpts for review purposes. iv Foreword The first edition of the Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice was published in autumn of 2012. The aim of the guidelines was to prevent increased antibiotic resistance. A questionnaire circulated to Danish veterinarians in 2015 (Jessen et al., DVT 10, 2016) indicated that the guidelines were well received, and particularly that active users had followed the recommendations. Despite a positive reception and the results of this survey, the actual quantity of antibiotics used is probably a better indicator of the effect of the first guidelines. Chapter two of these updated guidelines therefore details the pattern of developments in antibiotic use, as reported in DANMAP 2016 (www.danmap.org). -
Feral and Free Ranging Domestic Cats
No. 306 THE WILDLIFER Page 57 FERAL AND FREE-RANGING DOMESTIC CATS Position Statement Free and free-ranging domestic cats are exotic species to North America. Exotic species are recognized as one of the most widespread and serious threats to the integrity of native wildlife populations and natural ecosystems. Exotic species present special challenges for wildlife managers because their negative impacts are poorly understood by the general public, many exotic species have become such an accepted component of the envirom- nent that many people regard them as "natural," some exotic species have advocacy groups that promote their continued presence, and few policies and laws deal directly with their control. Perhaps no issue has captured more of the challenges for contemporary wildlife management than the impacts of feral or free-ranging human companion or domestic animals. The domestic cat is the companion animal that recently has attracted the most attention for its impact on wildlife species. Domestic cats originated from an ancestral wild species, the European and African wild cat (Felis silvestris). The domestic cat (Felis catus) is now considered a separate species. The estimated numbers of pet cats in urban and rural regions of the United States have grown from 30 million in 1970 to nearly 65 million in 2000. Reliable estimates of the present total cat population are not available. Nationwide, approximately 30% of households have cats. In rural areas, approximately 60% of households have cats. The impact of domestic cats on wildlife is difficult to quantify. However, a growing body of literature strongly suggests that domestic cats are a significant factor in the mortality of small mammals, birds, reptiles, and amphibians. -
Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat
UPTEC X 12 012 Examensarbete 30 hp Juni 2012 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Molecular Biotechnology Programme Uppsala University School of Engineering UPTEC X 12 012 Date of issue 2012-06 Author Carolin Johansson Title (English) Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Title (Swedish) Abstract This study presents mitochondrial genome sequences from 22 Egyptian house cats with the aim of resolving the uncertain origin of the contemporary world-wide population of Domestic cats. Together with data from earlier studies it has been possible to confirm some of the previously suggested haplotype identifications and phylogeny of the Domestic cat lineage. Moreover, by applying a molecular clock, it is proposed that the Domestic cat lineage has experienced several expansions representing domestication and/or breeding in pre-historical and historical times, seemingly in concordance with theories of a domestication origin in the Neolithic Middle East and in Pharaonic Egypt. In addition, the present study also demonstrates the possibility of retrieving long polynucleotide sequences from hair shafts and a time-efficient way to amplify a complete feline mitochondrial genome. Keywords Feline domestication, cat in ancient Egypt, mitochondrial genome, Felis silvestris libyca Supervisors Anders Götherström Uppsala University Scientific reviewer Jan Storå Stockholm University Project name Sponsors Language Security English Classification ISSN 1401-2138 Supplementary bibliographical information Pages 123 Biology Education Centre Biomedical Center Husargatan 3 Uppsala Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala Tel +46 (0)18 4710000 Fax +46 (0)18 471 4687 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Det är inte sedan tidigare känt exakt hur, när och var tamkatten domesticerades. -
Home Range Size, Habitat Utilisation and Movement Patterns of Suburban and Farm Cats Felis Catus
ECOGRAPHY 20: 271-280. Copenhagen 1997 Home range size, habitat utilisation and movement patterns of suburban and farm cats Felis catus David G. Barratt Bdrratt, D G 1997 Home range size, habitat utilisation and movement patterns of suburban and farm cats Felts caius - Ecography 20 271-280 The movements of 10 house cats (4 desexed females, 5 desexed males and 1 intact male) living on the edge of a suburb adjoining grassland and forest/woodland habitat, and a neighbounng colony of seven farm cats, were examined using radio-telemetry over nine months Nocturnal home range areas of the suburban cats vaned between 0 02 and 27 93 ha (mean 7 89 ha), and were larger than diumal home range areas (range 0 02 to 17 19 ha - mean 2 73 ha) Nocturnal home range areas of cats from the farm cat colony vaned between 1 38 and 4 46 ha (mean 2 54 ha), and were also larger than diumal home range areas (range 0 77 to 3 70 ha - mean 1 70 ha) Home ranges of cats in the farm cat colony overlapped extensively, as did those of cats living at the same suburban residence There was no overlap of home ranges of female cats from different residences, and little overlap between males and females from different residences Four of the suburban house cats moved between 390 m and 900 m into habitat adjoining the suburb Polygons descnbing the home ranges of these animals were strongly spatially biased away from the suburban environment, though the cats spent the majonty of their time within the bounds of the suburb Movements further than 100-200 m beyond the suburb edge were -
Missing Cats, Stray Coyotes: One Citizen’S Perspective
University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center Proceedings for 4-1-2007 MISSING CATS, STRAY COYOTES: ONE CITIZEN’S PERSPECTIVE Judith C. Webster Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons Webster, Judith C., "MISSING CATS, STRAY COYOTES: ONE CITIZEN’S PERSPECTIVE" (2007). Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings. 78. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/icwdm_wdmconfproc/78 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Wildlife Damage Management, Internet Center for at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Wildlife Damage Management Conferences -- Proceedings by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Missing Cats, Stray Coyotes: One Citizen’s Perspective * Judith C. Webster , Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Abstract : The author explores the issue of urban coyotes and coyote management from a cat owner’s perspective, with specific examples from Vancouver, B.C., Canada. Following a personal encounter with two coyotes in July 2005 that led to the death of a cat, the author has delved into the history of Vancouver’s “Co-existing with Coyotes”, a government-funded program run by a non- profit ecological society. The policy’s roots in conservation biology, the environmental movement, and the human dimensions branch of wildlife management are documented. The author contends that “Co-existing with Coyotes” puts people and pets at greater risk of attack by its inadequate response to habituated coyotes, and by an educational component that misrepresents real dangers and offers unworkable advice. -
Dog and Cat Vision
A professional publication for the clients of East Valley Animal Clinic WINTER 2018 East Valley Animal Clinic 5049 Upper 141st Street West Apple Valley, Minnesota 55124 Dog and Cat Vision Phone: 952-423-6800 Kathy Ranzinger, DVM Have you ever wondered about the difference between human vision and what Pam Takeuchi, DVM your dog or cat sees? There are a number of differences, and they don’t necessarily Katie Dudley, DVM see better than us, just differently. Mary Jo Wagner, DVM Have you ever noticed how a dog or cat’s eyes shine in the dark? This is because of Greg Wilkes, DVM a structure called the tapetum. It is a thin layer on the retina that reflects up to 130 www.EastValleyAnimalClinic.com times more light than what humans see. This structure, along with the large round shape of the dog and cat eye and the vertical shape of the pupil, allow a maximum Find us on Facebook! amount of light into the eye, allowing your cat to easily navigate the house in the middle of the night. Dogs and cats have less color vision than humans. Color vision is determined by the number of cones, which are color receptors, on the retina. Dogs possess about 20% of the color receptors that humans do. Dogs and cats outperform us in detection of shades of grey, which helps with night vision. Dogs’ color vision is similar to humans’ that have red-green color blindness: they see color, but do not have the broad spectrum of color vision that we see. -
Vaccinations in Cats
Vaccinations in Cats 803-808-7387 www.gracepets.com Recent advances in veterinary medical science have resulted in an increase in the number and type of vaccines that are available for use in cats, and improvements are continuously being made in their safety and efficacy. Some vaccines are more or less routinely advocated for all cats (‘core’ vaccines) whereas others are used more selectively according to circumstances. However, in all cases the selection of the correct vaccination program for each individual cat, including the frequency of repeat, or booster, vaccinations, requires professional advice. Currently cats can be vaccinated against several different diseases: “Core” Vaccines, as recommended by the American Association of Feline Practitioners (AAFP) for all kittens and cats: 1. Feline panleukopenia, FPV or FPL (also called feline infectious enteritis) caused by FPL virus or feline parvovirus 2. Feline viral rhinotracheitis, FVR caused by FVR virus, also known as herpes virus type 1, FHV-1 3. Feline caliciviral disease caused by various strains of Feline caliciviruses, FCV 4. Rabies caused by Rabies virus “Non-core” or discretionary vaccines, recommended for kittens and cats with realistic risk of exposure to specific diseases: 1. Feline chlamydial infection 2. Feline leukemia disease complex caused by Feline leukemia virus, FeLV 3. Feline Infectious Peritonitis (FIP) caused by FIP virus or Feline Coronavirus 4. Giardiasis caused by the protozoal parasite Giardia 5. Bordetellosis caused by the bacterium Bordetella bronchiseptica 6. Ringworm 7. Feline Immunodeficiency Virus (FIV) How do vaccines work? Vaccines work by stimulating the body's defense mechanisms or immune system to produce antibodies to a particular microorganism or microorganisms such as a virus, bacteria, or other infectious organism. -
Evaluation of the Predictive Validity of the Behavioural Assessment for Re-Homing K9’S (B.A.R.K.) Protocol and Owner Satisfaction with Adopted Dogs
Accepted Manuscript Title: Evaluation of the predictive validity of the behavioural assessment for re-homing K9’s (B.A.R.K.) protocol and owner satisfaction with adopted dogs Author: Kate M. Mornement Grahame J. Coleman Samia R. Toukhsati Pauleen C. Bennett PII: S0168-1591(15)00099-4 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.03.013 Reference: APPLAN 4057 To appear in: APPLAN Received date: 30-9-2014 Revised date: 22-3-2015 Accepted date: 28-3-2015 Please cite this article as: Mornement, K.M., Coleman, G.J., Toukhsati, S.R., Bennett, P.C.,Evaluation of the predictive validity of the behavioural assessment for re-homing K9’s (B.A.R.K.) protocol and owner satisfaction with adopted dogs., Applied Animal Behaviour Science (2015), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2015.03.013 This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. 1 Highlights 2 3 We examine the predictive validity of the B.A.R.K. protocol 4 B.A.R.K. predicted fearful and friendly behaviour post adoption 5 Problem behaviour and aggression post adoption were not predicted by B.A.R.K. 6 About 25% of adopted dogs assessed by B.A.R.K. -
2019 Feline Forum Conference Proceedings
2019 Feline Forum Conference Proceedings Table of Contents Equivocal Thyroid Hormone Test Results: What Do They Mean? 1 Dr. John August Gastrointestinal Function Tests: How Do We Interpret Results? 5 Dr. John August Arthropod Transmitted Infections of Cats 8 Dr. Leah Cohn Cytauxzoonosis 6 Dr. Leah Cohn Feline Infectious Peritonitis 21 Dr. Leah Cohn Feline Leukemia Virus Screening and Diagnostic Testing 26 Dr. Leah Cohn Feline Lower Airway Disorders 30 Dr. Leah Cohn Feline Chronic Enteropathy, Part I: The Diagnostic Approach 37 Dr. Audrey Cook Feline Chronic Enteropathy, Part II: Treatment 42 Dr. Audrey Cook Radiographic Diagnosis of Cardiac vs Respiratory Disease In Cats 46 Dr. Lindsey Gilmour The Fate of Feline Aortic Thromboembolic Disease 50 Dr. Christin Rutter Feline Heartworm Disease 54 Dr. Karen Snowden Poo-pourri of Parasitology 57 Dr. Karen Snowden Imaging Findings in the Vomiting Cat 61 Dr. Jessica Vallone Feeding Senior Cats With Cancer: GI Disease or CKD 64 Dr. Debra Zoran Equivocal Thyroid Hormone Results: What Do They Mean? John R. August School of Public Health Health Science Center Texas A&M University 1. KEY FACTS a. Hyperthyroidism (FHT) is the most common endocrinopathy of senior cats. b. FHT is due to the autonomous oversecretion of thyroid hormones (T4 and T3), resulting in an increased metabolic rate. c. 98% of cases of FHT result from benign adenomatous hyperplasia of the thyroid glands; 2% results from thyroid carcinoma. d. Clinical signs in well-established cases include weight loss, polyphagia, increased activity, and polydipsia/polyuria. e. A common scenario in practice is to suspect FHT based on weight loss since the last wellness examination, the palpation of one or both enlarged thyroid lobe(s), and the detection of a new cardiac murmur and resting tachycardia.