Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat UPTEC X 12 012 Examensarbete 30 hp Juni 2012 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Molecular Biotechnology Programme Uppsala University School of Engineering UPTEC X 12 012 Date of issue 2012-06 Author Carolin Johansson Title (English) Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Title (Swedish) Abstract This study presents mitochondrial genome sequences from 22 Egyptian house cats with the aim of resolving the uncertain origin of the contemporary world-wide population of Domestic cats. Together with data from earlier studies it has been possible to confirm some of the previously suggested haplotype identifications and phylogeny of the Domestic cat lineage. Moreover, by applying a molecular clock, it is proposed that the Domestic cat lineage has experienced several expansions representing domestication and/or breeding in pre-historical and historical times, seemingly in concordance with theories of a domestication origin in the Neolithic Middle East and in Pharaonic Egypt. In addition, the present study also demonstrates the possibility of retrieving long polynucleotide sequences from hair shafts and a time-efficient way to amplify a complete feline mitochondrial genome. Keywords Feline domestication, cat in ancient Egypt, mitochondrial genome, Felis silvestris libyca Supervisors Anders Götherström Uppsala University Scientific reviewer Jan Storå Stockholm University Project name Sponsors Language Security English Classification ISSN 1401-2138 Supplementary bibliographical information Pages 123 Biology Education Centre Biomedical Center Husargatan 3 Uppsala Box 592 S-75124 Uppsala Tel +46 (0)18 4710000 Fax +46 (0)18 471 4687 Origin of the Egyptian Domestic Cat Carolin Johansson Populärvetenskaplig sammanfattning Det är inte sedan tidigare känt exakt hur, när och var tamkatten domesticerades. Traditionellt har teorier fokuserat på ett fornegyptiskt ursprung då ett stort antal ikonografiska, arkeologiska och historiska källor vittnar om den speciella betydelse katten hade i det fornegyptiska samhället. Det har också föreslagits att katten domesticerades långt tidigare, kanske i samband med de första jordbrukssamhällena i området kring den så kallade bördiga halvmånen i Mellanöstern. I denna studie samlades pälsprover in från Egyptiska tamkatter i syfte att på molekylär nivå jämföra de Egyptiska katterna med tidigare studier av katter från andra delar av världen. För att göra detta kartlades hela uppsättningen av det genetiska materialet som bara ärvs på mödernet (mitokondriellt DNA) för 22 av de provtagna kattindividerna. Den stora mängden genetisk information gjorde att resultat av tidigare studier kunde fastställas med större säkerhet men också att utvidgningar av tamkattslinjen kunde anas i både förhistorisk och historisk tid. Detta skulle kunna tolkas som att katten genomgått flera av varandra oberoende domesticeringar, möjligen både i yngre stenålderns Mellanöstern och i det faraoniska Egypten. Studien visar därtill på hur man på ett förhållandevis enkelt sätt kan utvinna långa sekvenser av sådant genetiskt material från katthår, en typ av vävnad som vanligen anses innehålla relativt lite och relativt trasiga DNA-molekyler. Examensarbete 30 hp Civilingenjörsprogrammet Molekylär bioteknik Uppsala universitet, juni 2012 Contents 1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 9 1.1. The Felidae Family ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.1.1. The Felis .............................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.1.1. Phylogeny and Systematics .......................................................................................... 10 1.1.1.2. Pre-adaptations for Domestication within the Felis .................................................... 12 1.2. The Cat as a Domesticated Animal ............................................................................................ 16 1.2.1. The Domestic Cat ................................................................................................................ 16 1.2.1.1. Classifications ............................................................................................................... 16 1.2.1.2. Cat Breeds .................................................................................................................... 17 1.2.1.3. The Domestic Cat and its Wild Relatives...................................................................... 18 1.2.1.3.1. Characterisation Schemes ..................................................................................... 19 1.2.1.3.2. Problem of Hybridisation ...................................................................................... 20 1.2.1.4. Definition of Terms and Domestication Criteria .......................................................... 21 1.2.1.5. The Domesticated Status of the Cat ............................................................................ 24 1.3. Suggested Mechanisms for the Domestication of the Cat ........................................................ 26 1.3.1. Passive Domestication ........................................................................................................ 26 1.3.2. Actively Initiated Domestication ......................................................................................... 26 1.4. The Cat in the Ancient World ..................................................................................................... 27 1.4.1. Early Archaeological Sources of Cats .................................................................................. 27 1.4.2. Early Iconographical Sources of Cats .................................................................................. 30 1.4.3. The Cat in Ancient Egypt ..................................................................................................... 31 1.4.3.1. Felids in Egypt .............................................................................................................. 32 1.4.3.2. Predynastic Time, Early Dynastic Period, Old Kingdom and the First Intermediate Period (before 2055 BCE) .......................................................................................................... 32 1.4.3.3. Middle Kingdom and the Second Intermediate Period (2055 - 1550 BCE) .................. 33 1.4.3.4. New Kingdom and the Third Intermediate Period (1550 – 664 BCE) .......................... 35 1.4.3.5. Late Period and Greco-Roman Times (664 BCE – 395 CE) ........................................... 36 1.4.3.6. Cats in the Religion ...................................................................................................... 36 1.4.3.7. Cat Mummies ............................................................................................................... 38 1.4.4. Etymological Parallels ......................................................................................................... 43 1.4.5. The Cat in Antiquity and Beyond ........................................................................................ 44 1.5. Suggested Scenarios for the Domestication of the Cat ............................................................. 48 2. Aim and Project Design ................................................................................................................. 53 3. Material and Methods .................................................................................................................. 55 3.1. Sample Collection ...................................................................................................................... 55 3.2. Sample Preparation and DNA Extraction ................................................................................... 55 3.3. Amplification .............................................................................................................................. 56 3.4. Sequencing ................................................................................................................................. 58 3.5. Data Analyses ............................................................................................................................. 59 3.5.1. Phylogeny and Population Genetics ................................................................................... 59 3.5.2. Simulations .......................................................................................................................... 62 4. Results ........................................................................................................................................... 65 4.1. Success Rates ............................................................................................................................. 65 4.2. Sequencing and Coverage .......................................................................................................... 65 4.3. Phylogeny ................................................................................................................................... 71 4.4. Simulation Outcome .................................................................................................................. 86 5. Discussion ...................................................................................................................................... 87 5.1. Sample set .................................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Insertional Polymorphisms of Endogenous Feline Leukemia Viruses Alfred L
    Nova Southeastern University NSUWorks Biology Faculty Articles Department of Biological Sciences 4-2005 Insertional Polymorphisms of Endogenous Feline Leukemia Viruses Alfred L. Roca National Cancer Institute at Frederick William G. Nash National Cancer Institute at Frederick Joan C. Menninger National Cancer Institute at Frederick William J. Murphy National Cancer Institute at Frederick; Texas A&M University - College Station Stephen J. O'Brien National Cancer Institute at Frederick, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_facarticles Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, Veterinary Medicine Commons, and the Virology Commons NSUWorks Citation Roca, Alfred L.; William G. Nash; Joan C. Menninger; William J. Murphy; and Stephen J. O'Brien. 2005. "Insertional Polymorphisms of Endogenous Feline Leukemia Viruses." Journal of Virology 79, (7): 3979-3986. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cnso_bio_facarticles/ 206 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biological Sciences at NSUWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology Faculty Articles by an authorized administrator of NSUWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGY, Apr. 2005, p. 3979–3986 Vol. 79, No. 7 0022-538X/05/$08.00ϩ0 doi:10.1128/JVI.79.7.3979–3986.2005 Copyright © 2005, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Insertional Polymorphisms of Endogenous Feline Leukemia Viruses Alfred L. Roca,1* William G. Nash,2 Joan
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Shelters List by County
    MICHIGAN REGISTERED ANIMAL SHELTERS BY COUNTY COUNTY FACILITY NAME FACILITY ADDRESS CITY ZIP CODE PHONE Alcona ALCONA HUMANE SOCIETY 457 W TRAVERSE BAY STATE RD LINCOLN 48742 (989) 736-7387 Alger ALGER COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER 510 E MUNISING AVE MUNISING 49862 (906) 387-4131 Allegan ALLEGAN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER 2293 33RD STREET ALLEGAN 49010 (269) 673-0519 COUNTRY CAT LADY 3107 7TH STREET WAYLAND 49348 (616) 308-3752 Alpena ALPENA COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 625 11th STREET ALPENA 49707 (989) 354-9841 HURON HUMANE SOCIETY, INC. 3510 WOODWARD AVE ALPENA 49707 (989) 356-4794 Antrim ANTRIM COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL 4660 M-88 HWY BELLAIRE 49615 (231) 533-6421 ANTRIM COUNTY PET AND ANIMAL WATCH 125 IDA ST MANCELONA 49659 (231) 587-0738 HELP FROM MY FRIENDS, INC. 3820 RITT ROAD BELLAIRE 49615 (231) 533-4070 Arenac ARENAC COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 3750 FOCO ROAD STANDISH 48658 (989) 846-4421 Barry BARRY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 540 N INDUSTRIAL PARK DR HASTINGS 49058 (269) 948-4885 Bay BAY COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 800 LIVINGSTON BAY CITY 48708 (989) 894-0679 HUMANE SOCIETY OF BAY COUNTY 1607 MARQUETTE AVE BAY CITY 48706 (989) 893-0451 Benzie BENZIE COUNTY ANIMAL CONTROL SHELTER 543 S MICHIGAN AVE BEULAH 49617 (231) 882-9505 TINA'S BED AND BISCUIT INC 13030 HONOR HWY BEULAH 49617 (231) 645-8944 Berrien BERRIEN COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER 1400 S EUCLID AVE BENTON HARBOR 49022 (269) 927-5648 HUMANE SOCIETY - SOUTHWESTERN MICHIGAN 5400 NILES AVE ST JOSEPH 49085 (269) 927-3303 Branch BRANCH COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER 375 KEITH WILHELM DR COLDWATER 49036 (517) 639-3210 HUMANE SOCIETY OF BRANCH COUNTY, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • Felis Silvestris, Wild Cat
    The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ ISSN 2307-8235 (online) IUCN 2008: T60354712A50652361 Felis silvestris, Wild Cat Assessment by: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. View on www.iucnredlist.org Citation: Yamaguchi, N., Kitchener, A., Driscoll, C. & Nussberger, B. 2015. Felis silvestris. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species 2015: e.T60354712A50652361. http://dx.doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.UK.2015-2.RLTS.T60354712A50652361.en Copyright: © 2015 International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non-commercial purposes is authorized without prior written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Reproduction of this publication for resale, reposting or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written permission from the copyright holder. For further details see Terms of Use. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is produced and managed by the IUCN Global Species Programme, the IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC) and The IUCN Red List Partnership. The IUCN Red List Partners are: BirdLife International; Botanic Gardens Conservation International; Conservation International; Microsoft; NatureServe; Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew; Sapienza University of Rome; Texas A&M University; Wildscreen; and Zoological Society of London. If you see any errors or have any questions or suggestions on what is shown in this document, please provide us with feedback so that we can correct or extend the information
    [Show full text]
  • National Specialty Insurance Company Boost Pet Health Insurance Program
    National Specialty Insurance Company Boost Pet Health Insurance Program Countrywide Rating Manual Section I: General Rules A. Application of Manual 1. The rules contained in these pages will govern the rating of the Pet Health Insurance Plan policies. 2. The Pet Health Insurance Plan contains multiple benefit and coverage options. Unique benefit packages can be designed by constructing combinations of these benefit and coverage options. B. Premium Computation 1. Premiums at policy inception will be computed using the rules, rates and rating plan in effect at that time. 2. Premiums are calculated for each benefit package. 3. To calculate the monthly rate, divide the annual rate by 12, and then round to two decimal places. 4. To meet the demand of a marketable price point, a downward adjustment in price, not to exceed 5%, may be applied to the monthly premium. C. Additional Premium Charges 1. Additional premiums are computed using rates in effect at policy inception. 2. All coverage changes or additions involving additional premiums will be pro-rated based upon the effective date of the change. 3. If an endorsement or change to a policy results in an additional premium of $5 or less, no charge will be made. D. Return Premiums 1. Return premiums are computed using rates in effect at policy inception. 2. All coverage changes involving return premiums will be pro-rated based upon the effective date of the change. 3. If an endorsement or change to a policy results in a return premium of $5 or less, no return will be made. E. Minimum Premium The minimum premium per year is $50.00.
    [Show full text]
  • African Wildcat 1 African Wildcat
    African Wildcat 1 African Wildcat African Wildcat[1] Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Felis Species: F. silvestris Subspecies: F. s. lybica Trinomial name Felis silvestris lybica Forster, 1770 The African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), also known as the desert cat, and Vaalboskat (Vaal-forest-cat) in Afrikaans, is a subspecies of the wildcat (F. silvestris). They appear to have diverged from the other subspecies about 131,000 years ago.[2] Some individual F. s. lybica were first domesticated about 10,000 years ago in the Middle East, and are among the ancestors of the domestic cat. Remains of domesticated cats have been included in human burials as far back as 9,500 years ago in Cyprus.[3] [4] Physical characteristics The African wildcat is sandy brown to yellow-grey in color, with black stripes on the tail. The fur is shorter than that of the European subspecies. It is also considerably smaller: the head-body length is 45 to 75 cm (17.7 to 29.5 inches), the tail 20 to 38 cm (7.87 to 15 inches), and the weight ranges from 3 to 6.5 kg (6.61 to 14.3 lbs). Distribution and habitat The African wildcat is found in Africa and in the Middle East, in a wide range of habitats: steppes, savannas and bushland. The sand cat (Felis margarita) is the species found in even more arid areas. Skull African Wildcat 2 Behaviour The African wildcat eats primarily mice, rats and other small mammals. When the opportunity arises, it also eats birds, reptiles, amphibians, and insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Controlled Animals
    Environment and Sustainable Resource Development Fish and Wildlife Policy Division Controlled Animals Wildlife Regulation, Schedule 5, Part 1-4: Controlled Animals Subject to the Wildlife Act, a person must not be in possession of a wildlife or controlled animal unless authorized by a permit to do so, the animal was lawfully acquired, was lawfully exported from a jurisdiction outside of Alberta and was lawfully imported into Alberta. NOTES: 1 Animals listed in this Schedule, as a general rule, are described in the left hand column by reference to common or descriptive names and in the right hand column by reference to scientific names. But, in the event of any conflict as to the kind of animals that are listed, a scientific name in the right hand column prevails over the corresponding common or descriptive name in the left hand column. 2 Also included in this Schedule is any animal that is the hybrid offspring resulting from the crossing, whether before or after the commencement of this Schedule, of 2 animals at least one of which is or was an animal of a kind that is a controlled animal by virtue of this Schedule. 3 This Schedule excludes all wildlife animals, and therefore if a wildlife animal would, but for this Note, be included in this Schedule, it is hereby excluded from being a controlled animal. Part 1 Mammals (Class Mammalia) 1. AMERICAN OPOSSUMS (Family Didelphidae) Virginia Opossum Didelphis virginiana 2. SHREWS (Family Soricidae) Long-tailed Shrews Genus Sorex Arboreal Brown-toothed Shrew Episoriculus macrurus North American Least Shrew Cryptotis parva Old World Water Shrews Genus Neomys Ussuri White-toothed Shrew Crocidura lasiura Greater White-toothed Shrew Crocidura russula Siberian Shrew Crocidura sibirica Piebald Shrew Diplomesodon pulchellum 3.
    [Show full text]
  • Prepubertal Gonadectomy in Male Cats: a Retrospective Internet-Based Survey on the Safety of Castration at a Young Age
    ESTONIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES Institute of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences Hedvig Liblikas PREPUBERTAL GONADECTOMY IN MALE CATS: A RETROSPECTIVE INTERNET-BASED SURVEY ON THE SAFETY OF CASTRATION AT A YOUNG AGE PREPUBERTAALNE GONADEKTOOMIA ISASTEL KASSIDEL: RETROSPEKTIIVNE INTERNETIKÜSITLUSEL PÕHINEV NOORTE KASSIDE KASTREERIMISE OHUTUSE UURING Graduation Thesis in Veterinary Medicine The Curriculum of Veterinary Medicine Supervisors: Tiia Ariko, MSc Kaisa Savolainen, MSc Tartu 2020 ABSTRACT Estonian University of Life Sciences Abstract of Final Thesis Fr. R. Kreutzwaldi 1, Tartu 51006 Author: Hedvig Liblikas Specialty: Veterinary Medicine Title: Prepubertal gonadectomy in male cats: a retrospective internet-based survey on the safety of castration at a young age Pages: 49 Figures: 0 Tables: 6 Appendixes: 2 Department / Chair: Chair of Veterinary Clinical Medicine Field of research and (CERC S) code: 3. Health, 3.2. Veterinary Medicine B750 Veterinary medicine, surgery, physiology, pathology, clinical studies Supervisors: Tiia Ariko, Kaisa Savolainen Place and date: Tartu 2020 Prepubertal gonadectomy (PPG) of kittens is proven to be a suitable method for feral cat population control, removal of unwanted sexual behaviour like spraying and aggression and for avoidance of unwanted litters. There are several concerns on the possible negative effects on PPG including anaesthesia, surgery and complications. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety of PPG. Microsoft excel was used for statistical analysis. The information about 6646 purebred kittens who had gone through PPG before 27 weeks of age was obtained from the online retrospective survey. Database included cats from the different breeds and –age groups when the surgery was performed, collected in 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Mountain Cat 1 Chinese Mountain Cat
    Chinese mountain cat 1 Chinese mountain cat Chinese Mountain Cat[1] Conservation status [2] Vulnerable (IUCN 3.1) Scientific classification Kingdom: Animalia Phylum: Chordata Class: Mammalia Order: Carnivora Family: Felidae Genus: Felis Species: F. bieti Binomial name Felis bieti Milne-Edwards, 1892 Distribution of the Chinese Mountain Cat (in green) The Chinese Mountain Cat (Felis bieti), also known as the Chinese Desert Cat, is a small wild cat of western China. It is the least known member of the genus Felis, the common cats. A 2007 DNA study found that it is a subspecies of Felis silvestris; should the scientific community accept this result, this cat would be reclassified as Felis silvestris bieti.[3] Some authorities regard the chutuchta and vellerosa subspecies of the Wildcat as Chinese Mountain Cat subspecies.[1] Chinese mountain cat 2 Description Except for the colour of its fur, this cat resembles a European Wildcat in its physical appearance. It is 27–33 in (69–84 cm) long, plus a 11.5–16 in (29–41 cm) tail. The adult weight can range from 6.5 to 9 kilograms (14 to 20 lb). They have a relatively broad skull, and long hair growing between the pads of their feet.[4] The fur is sand-coloured with dark guard hairs; the underside is whitish, legs and tail bear black rings. In addition there are faint dark horizontal stripes on the face and legs, which may be hardly visible. The ears and tail have black tips, and there are also a few dark bands on the tail.[4] Distribution and ecology The Chinese Mountain Cat is endemic to China and has a limited distribution over the northeastern parts of the Tibetan Plateau in Qinghai and northern Sichuan.[5] It inhabits sparsely-wooded forests and shrublands,[4] and is occasionally found in true deserts.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Origin and Evolution of the Domestic Cat
    1 The Origin and Evolution of the Domestic Cat There are approximately 40 different species of the cat family, classification Felidae (Table 1.1), all of which are descended from a leopard-like predator Pseudaelurus that existed in South-east Asia around 11 million years ago (O’Brien and Johnson, 2007). Other than the domestic cat, the most well known of the Felidae are the big cats such as lions, tigers and panthers, sub-classification Panthera. But the cat family also includes a large number of small cats, including a group commonly known as the wildcats, sub-classification Felis silvestris (Table 1.2). Physical similarity suggests that the domestic cat (Felis silvestris catus) originally derived from one or more than one of these small wildcats. DNA examination shows that it is most closely related to the African wildcat (Felis silvestris lybica), which has almost identical DNA, indicating that the African wildcat is the domestic cat’s primary ancestor (Lipinski et al., 2008). The African Wildcat The African wildcat is still in existence today and is a solitary and highly territorial animal indigenous to areas of North Africa and the Near East, the region where domestication of the cat is believed to have first taken place (Driscoll et al., 2007; Faure and Kitchener, 2009). It is primarily a nocturnal hunter that preys mainly on rodents but it will also eat insects, reptiles and other mammals including the young of small antelopes. Also known as the Arabian or North African wildcat, it is similar in appearance to a domestic tabby, with a striped grey/sandy-coloured coat, but is slightly larger and with longer legs (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of SUZANNE D. CASE Chairperson Before the Senate
    SUZANNE D. CASE DAVID Y. IGE CHAIRPERSON GOVERNOR OF BOARD OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES HAWAII COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT ROBERT K. MASUDA FIRST DEPUTY JEFFREY T. PEARSON, P.E. DEPUTY DIRECTOR - WATER AQUATIC RESOURCES BOATING AND OCEAN RECREATION BUREAU OF CONVEYANCES COMMISSION ON WATER RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSERVATION AND COASTAL LANDS CONSERVATION AND RESOURCES ENFORCEMENT STATE OF HAWAII ENGINEERING FORESTRY AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT OF LAND AND NATURAL RESOURCES HISTORIC PRESERVATION KAHOOLAWE ISLAND RESERVE COMMISSION LAND STATE PARKS POST OFFICE BOX 621 HONOLULU, HAWAII 96809 Testimony of SUZANNE D. CASE Chairperson Before the Senate Committees on AGRICULTURE AND ENVIRONMENT and PUBLIC SAFETY, INTERGOVERNMENTAL, AND MILITARY AFFAIRS Wednesday, March 21, 2018 1:15 PM State Capitol, Conference Room 224 In consideration of HOUSE BILL 2593, HOUSE DRAFT 1 RELATING TO FERAL CATS House Bill 2593, House Draft 1 proposes to have an unspecified agency contract with a nonprofit animal rescue group to oversee caretakers of feral cats and would exempt those caretakers from state laws and county ordinances related to the feeding and confinement of cats. This measure would also establish a formal trap-sterilize-return process. The Department of Land and Natural Resources (Department) strongly opposes this measure. Feral cats are problematic in Hawaii for a number of reasons: they are predators of native wildlife, including species protected under federal law; they are hosts of parasites that can threaten both wildlife and humans; and "managed" colonies on public lands leave fecal matter in some of our most valuable natural areas, including an estimated 14 tons of cat feces each year in State Parks alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Savannah Cat’ ‘Savannah the Including Serval Hybrids Felis Catus (Domestic Cat), (Serval) and (Serval) Hybrids Of
    Invasive animal risk assessment Biosecurity Queensland Agriculture Fisheries and Department of Serval hybrids Hybrids of Leptailurus serval (serval) and Felis catus (domestic cat), including the ‘savannah cat’ Anna Markula, Martin Hannan-Jones and Steve Csurhes First published 2009 Updated 2016 © State of Queensland, 2016. The Queensland Government supports and encourages the dissemination and exchange of its information. The copyright in this publication is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Australia (CC BY) licence. You must keep intact the copyright notice and attribute the State of Queensland as the source of the publication. Note: Some content in this publication may have different licence terms as indicated. For more information on this licence visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/ by/3.0/au/deed.en" http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/au/deed.en Front cover: Close-up of a 4-month old F1 Savannah cat. Note the occelli on the back of the relaxed ears, and the tear-stain markings which run down the side of the nose. Photo: Jason Douglas. Image from Wikimedia Commons under a Public Domain Licence. Invasive animal risk assessment: Savannah cat Felis catus (hybrid of Leptailurus serval) 2 Contents Introduction 4 Identity of taxa under review 5 Identification of hybrids 8 Description 10 Biology 11 Life history 11 Savannah cat breed history 11 Behaviour 12 Diet 12 Predators and diseases 12 Legal status of serval hybrids including savannah cats (overseas) 13 Legal status of serval hybrids including savannah cats
    [Show full text]
  • PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3)
    PICA Project Report (Action A2.2 & 2.3) Investigation of Pallas’s cat activity patterns and temporal interactions with sympatric species Authors: Katarzyna Ruta, Gustaf Samelius, David Barclay, Emma Nygren PICA - “Conservation of the Pallas’s cat through capacity building, research, and global planning” 1. Introduction: 1.1 Activity patterns of wild felids: Activity patterns form a part of species’ adaptation to their environment (Beltran & Delibes, 1994) and are therefore a fundamental aspect of animal behaviour (Nielsen, 1983; Weller & Bennett, 2001). Felids are generally considered to be crepuscular and nocturnal in their activity (Kitchener, 1991), although they are well adapted to function in a wide range of light conditions (Sunquist & Sunquist, 2002). Numerous abiotic pressures and biotic interactions are known to shape the temporal behaviour of (cat-like) carnivores (Marinho et al., 2018), including changes in temperature (Beltran & Delibes, 1994; Podolski et al., 2013), light (Huck et al., 2017; Heurich et al., 2014) and season (Podolski et al., 2013; Manfredi et al., 2011), sex and reproductive status of the animal (Kolbe & Squires, 2007; Schmidt, 1999; Schmidt et al., 2009), predation risk (Caro, 2005; Farías et al., 2012) and human disturbance (Wolf & Ale, 2009; Ale & Brown, 2009). Owing to the dietary constraints of carnivores whose preys have their own well-defined circadian rhythms (Halle, 2000; Zielinski, 2000), the availability and vulnerability of prey is, however, considered as one of the main influences on predator temporal activity (Zielinski, 1988; Lodé, 1995). According to Optimal Foraging Theory, predators are expected to synchronize their daily activity with the activity of their most profitable prey, increasing the probability of encounters while reducing energy expenditure (MacArthur & Pianka, 1966; Monterroso et al., 2013; Emmons, 1987).
    [Show full text]