Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition and Life Cycle

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition and Life Cycle Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management Published by Dayton Aerospace, Inc. 4141 Colonel Glenn Hwy, Suite 252 Dayton, Ohio 45431 937.426.4300 Print and Electronic Distribution Rights This publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without prior written permission of Dayton Aerospace—provided it is distributed in whole, without edit or manipulation, and Dayton Aerospace is properly credited as the source. If you have questions about using this document, please contact Dayton Aerospace at the address above. All photos are US Government works photographed by the US Air Force, US Army, and US Navy. Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management Preface Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition and Life Cycle Management: A Practical Guide for Program Managers provides both industry and government program and product support managers (PM/PSMs), staffs, and other acquisition officials with a systematic guide to assess, implement, and execute successful competition strategies for government programs. This guide contains chapters on all phases of the weapon system’s life cycle including technology maturation and risk reduction (TMRR); engineering and manufacturing development (EMD); production and deployment; and operations and support (O&S). Numerous acquisition program case studies and examples are included to illustrate various competitive strategies. Finally, this guide draws upon relevant competition studies and literature to develop a decision framework for use in evaluating programs for competition. The competition decision framework (CDF) proposed in this guide has not been endorsed or approved by the US Air Force (USAF) or the Department of Defense (DOD). ii Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management iii Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management Acknowledgements This guide draws upon research and reports sponsored and/or published by the Department of Defense (DOD), Defense Acquisition University (DAU), Congressional Research Service (CRS), Government Accountability Office (GAO), Naval Postgraduate School (NPS), Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT), RAND Corporation, Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA), University of Maryland, Technomics, and Dayton Aerospace, Inc. The genesis of this guide is the 1984 DOD Competition Handbook, Establishing Competitive Production Sources: A Handbook for Program Managers. William K. Stockman, PhD, Lt. Col., USAF (Ret) Thomas S. Wells, CFCM, SES, DAF (Ret) ABOUT THE AUTHORS Dr. Bill Stockman is a PhD economist who led, researched, developed, and taught many of the graduate acquisition programs at AFIT, including the cost estimating graduate program which covers the majority of topics in this guide. While on active duty, he developed and led the cost teams’ research and evaluations for the three largest depot competitions in USAF history. He has authored over 75 major study reports, books, and guidebooks—most notably, based on his research for a major USAF effort, a textbook on commercial derivative systems and how they play a major role in weapon system competitions. Mr. Tom Wells possesses an extensive background in government contracting and acquisition theory in the USAF’s largest acquisition and sustainment organizations, including as director, 711th Human Performance Wing, AFRL; director of contracting, Headquarters Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC); and director of contracting and competition advocate, USAF Electronic Systems Center (ESC) (now part of AFLCMC). As a highly-experienced procurement analyst, he has researched and published several USAF guides, handbooks, and templates on acquisition planning and competition strategies. During his multiple director-level assignments, he developed and/or executed many of the current competition strategies used today in the DOD, including authoring or approving hundreds of source selection documents, plans, and procurement policies/regulations. iv Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management ABOUT DAYTON AEROSPACE Dayton Aerospace is a veteran-owned small business providing senior-level, hands-on support to both government and industry customers since 1984. All key personnel are retired senior military or US Government civilians, averaging over 30 years of experience in all technical and management disciplines essential to weapon system acquisition and sustainment. Our experts have held important government positions such as center/laboratory commander, system program director, chief engineer, program executive officer (PEO), AFIT department head, and director of various functional home offices such as contracting and financial management. Our team uses this experience to develop tightly focused products to support all phases of the DOD acquisition life cycle—for customers working programs for all military services in the US and internationally. To learn more about Dayton Aerospace, visit www.daytonaero.com. v Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management Purpose and Organization Dayton Aerospace authored this competition guide to provide industry and government acquisition workforces with information and practical support for planning and effectively implementing competitive acquisition strategies throughout the systems acquisition life cycle. While this guide is meant to be a first stop for program managers and teams concerning competition, it is not designed to serve as the single source for all relevant acquisition knowledge and supporting tools. Readers should take advantage of the numerous footnotes and extensive bibliography contained within to research supporting topics, as needed, to effectively implement competition for their acquisition program. Government and industry program offices with potential competition opportunities are the primary audiences for this guide. The guide is written for mid- to senior-level professionals with some experience in acquisition and sustainment. Its intent is to help readers think through a wide range of competition strategies, rather than to dictate “schoolhouse” solutions. This guide relies heavily on current guidance and regulation, but the authors are well aware that DOD policies adapt on a regular basis to changes in the political, economic, and defense environments. Therefore, this guide presents strategies intended to cover a broad scope of policy alternatives, as appropriate. The acquisition team should not rely on this guide as an authoritative source for the most current regulation and policy. The guide is organized as follows: Chapter 1 – Competition Environment: The first chapter discusses unique attributes of the DOD acquisition and product support marketplace. While providing some general theory, this chapter’s purpose is to identify benefits of competition, potential barriers to competition, and methods to overcome these barriers. An overview of competition planning for the defense systems life cycle is presented along with an introduction to the competition decision framework (CDF) which is discussed in detail in later Chapters. Chapter 1 also summarizes major laws and regulations relating to competition for defense programs. Chapters 2-5 – Acquisition Process: The next four chapters provide insight into how competition can be introduced and/or maintained during each of the major acquisition phases defined by DODI 5000.02, Operation of the Defense Acquisition System. This guide distinguishes between competition for award of a contract (i.e., competition is used to select a single contractor to perform the effort required during the phase) and competition during the phase (i.e., more than one contractor receives a contract to perform the required effort). Maintaining competition during an acquisition phase can be used as a strategy to ensure that competition for subsequent phases is viable (i.e., avoiding a sole source situation for subsequent phases). Each chapter follows a similar outline intended to help the program manager assess their program, develop a competitive strategy, and then execute that strategy. Each chapter includes the following: ▪ Short introduction and description of the phase as it applies to competition strategies. ▪ Brief review of applicable regulations directly related to the phase. vi Competitive Strategies for Systems Acquisition & Life Cycle Management ▪ Detailed discussion of general and specific competition strategies, methods, and techniques applicable to that phase, and insight regarding the application of the discussed strategies. ▪ Discussion of current phase actions necessary to enable competition in future phases. ▪ Review of best practices and lessons learned applicable to the phase. ▪ Numerous case studies to demonstrate how competition strategies have been used on current and past programs—from brief examples to detailed descriptions of the competitive strategy, its execution, and the outcome. Chapter 6 – Competition Decision Framework: The final chapter presents a competition decision framework (CDF) which guides the evaluation of competition opportunities at each program phase. This evaluation is required at program inception and must be reviewed and updated at each milestone or major program change. The decision framework process has four parts that are detailed in this chapter: ▪ Assess competition considerations (technical, program, and market situations) ▪ Evaluate competitive strategy alternatives ▪ Conduct
Recommended publications
  • Winter 2019 Full Issue the .SU
    Naval War College Review Volume 72 Article 1 Number 1 Winter 2019 2019 Winter 2019 Full Issue The .SU . Naval War College Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review Recommended Citation Naval War College, The .SU . (2019) "Winter 2019 Full Issue," Naval War College Review: Vol. 72 : No. 1 , Article 1. Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 Winter 2019 Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2019 1 Naval War College Review, Vol. 72 [2019], No. 1, Art. 1 Cover Aerial view of an international container cargo ship. In “Ships of State?,” Christopher R. O’Dea describes how China COSCO Shipping Corporation Limited has come to control a rapidly expanding network of ports and terminals, ostensibly for commercial purposes, but has thereby gained the ability to project power through the increased physical presence of its naval vessels—turning the oceans that historically have protected the United States from foreign threats into a venue in which China can challenge U.S. interests. Credit: Getty Images https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol72/iss1/1 2 Naval War College: Winter 2019 Full Issue NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW Winter 2019 Volume 72, Number 1 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE PRESS 686 Cushing Road Newport, RI 02841-1207 Published by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Jersey Bounce Fall 2009
    USS New Jersey Veterans, Inc. “THE JERSEY BOUNCE” Fall 2009 Issue Email - WWW.USSNEWJERSEY.ORG LPD 21 USS NEW YORK The 22nd reunion was held at the Crowne Plaza Riverfront Hotel in Jacksonville, Florida, October 7th through October 11th, 2009. The organization enjoyed a very successful reunion. The Memorial Service, St. Augustine and Jacksonville tours, Dinner Cruise, Welcome Aboard Dinner, and a Dinner Dance Banquet were well at- tended. We want to thank the reunion committee for a job well done. The reunion committee worked hard in providing this annual opportunity for our shipmates to become reacquainted with old friends and shipmates. These reunions are a great opportunity to make new friends, or just reminisce sea stories of bygone days. The days of the battleship, the most feared dreadnaught on the high seas, are long gone, but the battleship sailors live on and on. Newer and more deadly ships are joining the fleet providing firepower that we can- not imagine only conjecture. USS New Jersey Veterans Inc Officer & Directors President / Director Vice President / Director Joe DiMaria Ernest Dalton 645 Brisa Ct. 7143 Rolling Hill Lane Chesapeake, VA 23322 San Antonio, Texas 78227 757-549-2178 210-275-7886 [email protected] [email protected] Secretary/Director Treasurer/Director Membership/Director A.J. Smith John Pete Vance Steve Sheehan 538 Kiddsville Road 1541 Hayden Rd 1209 Cumberland RD Fishersville, VA 22939 Deland, FL 32724 Abington, PA 19001 540-943-2862 386-736-3231 215-887-7583 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Master at Arms Liaison/Director Small Stores/Director Joe Porambo Mark Babcock John Pete Vance 1503 Elder Ave 5231 El Monte St.
    [Show full text]
  • Syndeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment Used on the USS New York (LPD-21)
    For Release: Contact: NEWS Jill See Immediate Marketing Specialist T: 562-236-1175 F: 562-944-9958 SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment Used on the USS New York (LPD-21) PLACENTIA, CA (June 2009) – The military ship building/repair industry is highly focused on the efficiencies that come from ultra lightweight materials. However, most deck underlayments do not meet the lightweight requirements of the marine industry. California-based Epmar Corporation, with more than 20 years of experience providing the marine industry with primary deck coatings and underlayments, designed the SynDeck™ product line to meet the specific needs of surface materials, application and underlayment performance requirements for military and commercial marine vessels. SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment gives the highest possible performance with the lightest possible weight, and provides excellent corrosion resistance (MilSpec 3135). Northrop-Grumman Ship Systems, Avondale Operations, located in the greater New Orleans area, is currently building new LPD-class amphibious transport ships using Epmar’s SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment in all inhabited interior deck spaces. This new class of ship includes the LPD-21 USS New York, which was named to honor those that died in the September 11, 2001 attack on the World Trade Center. In fact, the bow stem of this particular ship was forged from reclaimed steel from World Trade Center buildings. When completed, the USS New York is slated to return to New York City to be commissioned into the US Navy, and will be operating out of the Norfolk Naval Shipyard. Gary Hayes, sales manager for the SynDeck™ line said, “Epmar Corporation is extremely proud to have SynDeck™ Ultra Lightweight Underlayment, SS1290, used for the deck underlayment on this class of ship, and on the USS New York in particular.” SynDeck™ is a complete line of deck underlayment products and systems used in the construction, overhaul and repair of decking and other surfaces in the marine environment.
    [Show full text]
  • July 2019 Whole No
    Dedicated to the Study of Naval and Maritime Covers Vol. 86 No. 7 July 2019 Whole No. 1028 July 2019 IN THIS ISSUE Feature Cover From the Editor’s Desk 2 Send for Your Own Covers 2 Out of the Past 3 Calendar of Events 3 Naval News 4 President’s Message 5 The Goat Locker 6 For Beginning Members 8 West Coast Navy News 9 Norfolk Navy News 10 Chapter News 11 Fleet Week New York 2019 11 USS ARKANSAS (BB 33) 12 2019-2020 Committees 13 Pictorial Cancellations 13 USS SCAMP (SS 277) 14 One Reason Why we Collect 15 Leonhard Venne provided the feature cover for this issue of the USCS Log. His cachet marks the 75th Anniversary of Author-Ship: the D-Day Operations and the cover was cancelled at LT Herman Wouk, USNR 16 Williamsburg, Virginia on 6 JUN 2019. USS NEW MEXICO (BB 40) 17 Story Behind the Cover… 18 Ships Named After USN and USMC Aviators 21 Fantail Forum –Part 8 22 The Chesapeake Raider 24 The Joy of Collecting 27 Auctions 28 Covers for Sale 30 Classified Ads 31 Secretary’s Report 32 Page 2 Universal Ship Cancellation Society Log July 2019 The Universal Ship Cancellation Society, Inc., (APS From the Editor's Desk Affiliate #98), a non-profit, tax exempt corporation, founded in 1932, promotes the study of the history of ships, their postal Midyear and operations at this end seem to markings and postal documentation of events involving the U.S. be back to normal as far as the Log is Navy and other maritime organizations of the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Acquisition Reform Regimes on Their Own Terms: Context, Mechanisms, Effects, and Space Program Impact
    CENTER FOR SPACE POLICY AND STRATEGY FEBRUARY 2019 ACQUISITION REFORM REGIMES ON THEIR OWN TERMS: CONTEXT, MECHANISMS, EFFECTS, AND SPACE PrOGraM IMPACT ROSALIND LEWIS, SUSAN E. HASTINGS, MARTHA D. CALLAWAY, ALBERT C. HOHEB, JONATHAN E. GAYEK, AND RUSSELL RUMBAUGH ThE AEROSPACE CORPORATION © 2018 The Aerospace Corporation. All trademarks, service marks, and trade names contained herein are the property of their respective owners. Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. OTR201900108 ROSALIND LEWIS Rosalind Lewis is the Principal Director of the Acquisition Analysis and Planning Subdivision at The Aerospace Corporation. In this position, Lewis manages four departments that support a variety of activities in the areas of acquisition decision analysis and support; cross program studies; modeling to include industrial base, cost, schedule and risk analysis; and system engineering and program execution support. Previously she held senior engineer positions at Litton Guidance and Control Systems and RAND Corporation focusing on software development and studies regarding the acquisition, development, and use of space systems. Additionally, she was an adjunct instructor at Loyola Marymount University for nine years in the field of systems engineering. Lewis holds a bachelor’s degree from the University of Southern California (USC) in computer science, a master’s degree in computer science from New York University, and a master’s degree in systems architecture and engineering from USC. SUSAN E. HASTINGS Susan E. Hastings, a retired USAF Lieutenant Colonel, is an associate principal director in Aerospace’s Acquisition Analysis and Planning Subdivision. Throughout her career as an acquisition professional, she has worked in nine acquisition organizations and contributed to establishing three major space programs.
    [Show full text]
  • THE SHIP BUILDER Vol. 56 Issue 1
    Vol. 56 Issue 1 Vol. THE SHIPBUILDER THE SHIP BUILDER Vol. 56 Issue 1 THE SHIPBUILDER ▶ Contents CONNECT WITH NASSCO 04 08 10 12 16 Messages NASSCO PDP PROFILES PERFORM CONTINUOUSLY From NEWS EVERY DAY IMPROVE The Helm BRIEFS The Shipbuilder Manager of Public and Government Relations: Dennis DuBard Senior Communications Specialist: Staci Ignell Communications Specialist: Xenon Alidag Content Layout: Jacqueline Ruiz 18 28 30 32 COVER Published by General Dynamics NASSCO Communications Department, P.O. Box 85278, San Diego, CA 92186-5278. Spring 2016. Direct comments to Dennis DuBard at [email protected] or Staci Ignell at [email protected] EMPLOYEE NASSCO In The SHIPYARD NASSCO- NASSCO SHIPBUILDERS Contributors: Nydia Ortiz-Avendano, Greyson Bailey, Hugo Bermudez, Lila Casora, Keith Cobb, Allyson Darroch, Lary Duby, Sandi Dunkel, Sherry CORNER community VISITORS NORFOLK INSTALL NON-SKID ABOARD Eberling, Larry Ehmer, Valerie Fusco, Dave Hastings, Samantha Huerta, Anthony Jemison, Beth Korkuch, Mark Lendy, Bob Liddell, Keith Londot, Megan THE USS AMERICA McLaughlin, Zach McWaters, Tony Muniz, Steve Murray, Petia Pavlova, Allison Pierson, James Pope, Lisa Root, Bryan Ruiz, John Russell, Steve Severs, Zach NEWS Sharpe, Clint Spivey, Katie Urbas, Duke Vuong, Mike Wagoner. 2 3 THE SHIPBUILDER ▶ MESSAGES FROM THE HELM Message From The PresidentFrederick J. Harris Message From The GeneralKevin manager M. Graney Our workload has largely stabilized Quality In February, the Navy’s Chief of Naval Operations, Admiral John Richardson, stopped by our following the historic delivery of In 2015, while we were working hard to deliver three lead shipyard in San Diego to learn more about our current work in both new construction and repair.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTACT: David W. Pijor Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 703-436-3802
    CONTACT: David W. Pijor Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 703-436-3802 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE – February 21, 2013 First Virginia Community Bank Donates Funds for USS Arlington FAIRFAX, Va. – First Virginia Community Bank (FVCbank) has donated $10,000 in support of the USS Arlington, a ship named for the Pentagon’s home city to commemorate the September 11, 2001 attacks. The contribution will go towards the USS Arlington’s commissioning, the ceremony marking a ship’s placement in active service, which is planned for early April at Naval Station Norfolk. The donation will also help fund construction of a Tribute Room on the ship to honor the heroes of 9/11. Steel taken from the Pentagon after the attacks will be displayed aboard as a commemorative symbol. “Our involvement with the USS Arlington is a manifestation of our core belief in supporting the communities in which we do business,” said David W. Pijor, chairman and chief executive officer of the Fairfax-based bank, which opened an Arlington office in October. “The occasion allows us to recognize the deep and meaningful bonds between the military and the civilian population of the Arlington area, which are so important to us all.” FVCbank was recognized for its support at a reception on January 31 at the Army Navy Country Club in Arlington. The commissioning committee and the Navy League of Hampton Roads, a nonprofit organization that is raising funds for the ship’s enhancements, presented a plaque to Pijor, bank president Burwell Gunn, and Sid Simmons, who sits on FVCbank’s board of directors.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of Defense Acquisition of Leading-Edge Information Technology Services and the Impact of Public Market
    West Chester University Digital Commons @ West Chester University West Chester University Doctoral Projects Masters Theses and Doctoral Projects Spring 2020 United States Department of Defense Acquisition of Leading-Edge Information Technology Services and the Impact of Public Market Research on Efficiency andff E ectiveness Thomas Denning [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/all_doctoral Part of the American Politics Commons, Business Administration, Management, and Operations Commons, Defense and Security Studies Commons, Government Contracts Commons, Military and Veterans Studies Commons, Military, War, and Peace Commons, National Security Law Commons, Policy Design, Analysis, and Evaluation Commons, Policy History, Theory, and Methods Commons, and the Public Administration Commons Recommended Citation Denning, Thomas, "United States Department of Defense Acquisition of Leading-Edge Information Technology Services and the Impact of Public Market Research on Efficiency andff E ectiveness" (2020). West Chester University Doctoral Projects. 60. https://digitalcommons.wcupa.edu/all_doctoral/60 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Masters Theses and Doctoral Projects at Digital Commons @ West Chester University. It has been accepted for inclusion in West Chester University Doctoral Projects by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @ West Chester University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. United States Department of Defense
    [Show full text]
  • Systems Engineering and Program Management Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons Programs
    THE ARTS This PDF document was made available CHILD POLICY from www.rand.org as a public service of CIVIL JUSTICE the RAND Corporation. EDUCATION ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT Jump down to document6 HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit NATIONAL SECURITY research organization providing POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY objective analysis and effective SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY solutions that address the challenges SUBSTANCE ABUSE facing the public and private sectors TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY around the world. TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE WORKFORCE AND WORKPLACE Support RAND Purchase this document Browse Books & Publications Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non- commercial use only. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents. This product is part of the RAND Corporation reprint series. RAND reprints reproduce previously published journal articles and book chapters with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints have been formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher’s editorial policy. Systems Engineering and Program Management Trends and Costs for Aircraft and Guided Weapons Programs David E. Stem, Michael Boito, Obaid Younossi Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Defense Acquisition Research Journal
    Analyzing Past Trends to Predict Future ACQUISITION OUTCOMES July 2017 Vol. 24 No. 3 | ISSUE 82 Analyzing Cost Growth at Program Stages for DoD Aircraft Capt Scott J. Kozlak, USAF, Edward D. White, Jonathan D. Ritschel, Lt Col Brandon Lucas, USAF, and Michael J. Seibel Estimating Firm-Anticipated Defense Acquisition Costs with a Value-Maximizing Framework LTJG Sean Lavelle, USN Informing Policy through Quantification of the Intellectual Property Lock-in Associated with DoD Acquisition Maj Christopher Berardi, USAF, Bruce Cameron, and Ed Crawley The Impact of a Big Data Decision Support Tool on Military Logistics: Medical Analytics Meets the Mission Felix K. Chang, Christopher J. Dente, and CAPT Eric A. Elster, USN Online-only Article Beyond Integration Readiness Level (IRL): A Multidimensional Framework to Facilitate the Integration of System of Systems Maj Clarence Eder, USAF (Ret.), Thomas A. Mazzuchi, and Shahram Sarkani Online-only Article Effectiveness Test and Evaluation of Non-lethal Weapons in Crowd Scenarios: Metrics, Measures, and Design of Experiments Elizabeth Mezzacappa, Gordon Cooke, Robert M. DeMarco, Gladstone V. Reid, Kevin Tevis, Charles Sheridan, Kenneth R. Short, Nasir Jaffery, and John B. Riedener Article List The Defense Acquisition Professional Reading List Destructive Creation: American Business and ARJ Extra the Winning of World War II Written by Mark R. Wilson and reviewed by Benjamin Franklin Cooling Mr. James A. MacStravic Performing the duties of Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics Mr. James P. Woolsey President, Defense Acquisition University Editorial Board Dr. Larrie D. Ferreiro Chairman and Executive Editor Mr. Richard Altieri Dr. J. Ronald Fox Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Crisis in the Acquisition Workforce: Some Simple Solutions
    Crisis in the Acquisition OPINIONWorkforce: Some Simple Solutions CRISIS IN THE ACQUISITION WORKFORCE: SOME SIMPLE SOLUTIONS James H. Gill The military acquisition system is facing a crisis of significant proportions, with the imminent loss, through retirement and attrition, of a substantial portion of its experienced workforce, which is responsible for the development, production, and deployment of new weapons. Implications for vital national security issues, for both the near and long term, are serious. The potential inability of the acquisition process to provide quality weapons in a timely manner and at a reasonable price should be disturbing to senior leaders within the Department of Defense (DoD). What can be done about the potential loss of this acquisition leadership? Here are some creative approaches, although they will require bucking entrenched bureaucracies to implement, that could resolve the current shortfall and prevent future ones. he acquisition workforce is aging. specialized civilian workforce. This is a “given” and has been doc- Further, 50 percent will be eli- T umented by the Acquisition 2005 gible to retire by 2005. In some Task Force Final Report: “Shaping the occupations, half of the current Civilian Acquisition Workforce of The employees will be gone by 2006. Future” (2000). The report identifies the problem as follows: This potential loss may or may not have significance on the ability of the Services [DoD] is facing a crisis that can to provide weapons to their customers dramatically affect our Nation’s (i.e., the warfighter), but the potential ability to provide warfighters with implications can’t be ignored. modern weapon systems needed While the composition of the acquisi- to defend our national interests.
    [Show full text]
  • Adam Ross Dual Masters Thesis Outline
    ASSESSING AND MITIGATING VULNERABILITY CHAINS IN MODEL- CENTRIC ACQUISITION PROGRAMS by Jack Burnett Reid B.S. Mechanical Engineering and B.A. Philosophy Texas A&M University, 2015 Submitted to the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society And the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degrees of Master of Science in Technology and Policy And Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology June 2018 2018 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of Author……………………………………………………………………………………………………... MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics May 18, 2018 Certified by……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Donna H. Rhodes Principal Research Scientist, Sociotechnical Systems Research Center Thesis Supervisor Certified by……………………………………………………………………………………………………………... Daniel E. Hastings Cecil and Ida Green Education Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics and Engineering Systems Chief Executive Officer and Director, Singapore MIT Alliance for Research and Technology Thesis Supervisor Accepted by…………………………………...………………………………………………………………………… Munther Dahleh W. Coolidge Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Director, MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society Accepted by…………………………………...………………………………………………………………………… Hamsa Balakrishnan Associate Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics Chair, Graduate Program Committee This material is partially based
    [Show full text]