Progress on Plutonium Consolidation, Storage and Disposition

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

PROGRESS ON PLUTONIUM CONSOLIDATION, STORAGE AND DISPOSITION March 2019 BACKGROUND OVERVIEW OF THE MANAGEMENT AND This paper provides an update on the NDA’s DISPOSITION OF PLUTONIUM IN THE UK progress on developing and implementing the UK’s plutonium management strategy in line with One of the most complex challenges facing the UK government policy. NDA in dealing with the UK’s nuclear legacy is the management and, ultimately, disposition of the This work covers three distinct areas of focus: inventory of separated plutonium held in the UK Consolidation, Safe and Secure Storage and (ref.1). The inventory has arisen from large-scale Disposition. reprocessing of spent fuel from both UK Magnox • Consolidation: and AGR power stations but also from overseas The NDA has taken the strategic decision to energy utilities under historical commercial consolidate the Dounreay plutonium inventory agreements. at Sellafield, the UK’s centre of excellence for plutonium management, where it can be The safe and secure management of civil better managed, and enable progress towards separated plutonium is a UK government priority. decommissioning and remediation of the Continued, indefinite, long-term storage leaves Dounreay site. a burden of security risks and proliferation sensitivities for future generations to manage. • Safe and Secure Storage: The UK government, working with the NDA, The NDA is ensuring the continued safe and aims to identify a solution that puts the UK’s civil secure storage of plutonium in the UK by plutonium beyond reach. This could be reuse as repacking the material for placement in a suite Mixed Oxide Fuel (MOX) in nuclear reactors or of modern stores, allowing time to develop as an immobilised product. This would put the and implement the right long-term disposition material in a form which both reduces the long- solution. term security burden during storage and ensures it is suitable for disposal in a Geological Disposal • Disposition: Facility (GDF). Implementing a long-term solution The NDA is supporting the UK government in for plutonium is essential to dealing with the UK’s the development of a long-term disposition nuclear legacy. solution to put separated plutonium beyond reach. 2 PLUTONIUM MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSITION PROGRAMME Objective: Ensure all separated plutonium is stored on one site, in a small number of facilities where it can be better CONSOLIDATION managed Activities: Transfer all of our plutonium stocks to Sellafield Objective: Ensure the safe and secure storage of SAFE AND plutonium in stores with enhanced resilience measures SECURE Activities: Repack and retreat plutonium packages to allow STORAGE time to implement the right long-term solution Objective: Support government in developing a long-term DISPOSITION: solution to put separated plutonium beyond reach THE LONG-TERM SOLUTION Activities: Work with government, developers and technology suppliers on reuse and immobilisation options The inventory of plutonium in the UK has arisen from the large-scale reprocessing of spent fuel. Reprocessing separates spent fuel into uranium, plutonium and waste products. 3 4 CONSOLIDATION THE CONSOLIDATION OF THE UK’S and the IAEA. Following the UK’s exit from CIVIL SEPARATED PLUTONIUM INVENTORY the European Union, the ONR will take over AT SELLAFIELD responsibility for ensuring UK compliance with these agreements (ref.3 and ref.4). Reprocessing separates spent nuclear fuel into uranium, plutonium and waste products. Following engagement and consultation in The end of spent nuclear fuel reprocessing 2012, the NDA took the decision to transfer at Sellafield began with the completion of the the plutonium inventory currently held at THORP reprocessing programme in 2018 Dounreay to Sellafield (ref.5). This means that and will be followed by the closure of Magnox all significant stocks will ultimately be stored reprocessing in 2020. The NDA will hold an at Sellafield, the UK’s centre of excellence inventory of around 140 tonnes of separated for plutonium management. It also enables plutonium by the time reprocessing finishes progress towards the decommissioning and (ref.2). Nearly all of this is held at Sellafield, remediation of the Dounreay site. with a relatively small amount at Dounreay. About 23 tonnes is foreign-owned, largely but The NDA initially proposed construction of a not exclusively by Japanese utilities, and is specialised facility at Dounreay to package managed under long-term contracts. materials for transport to Sellafield. Recently, under a modified approach, material is Due to the radioactive and fissile nature of instead being shipped directly to Sellafield, for the material, plutonium handling and storage treatment and repackaging, before transfer requires specialised facilities and stringent to the modern Sellafield Product and Residue management arrangements. The independent Store (SPRS) for long-term storage. This avoids Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) is the requirement for a specialised facility at responsible for regulating nuclear safety and Dounreay and makes best use of the Sellafield security across the UK and its inspectors ensure expertise in managing plutonium. that site licensees (Sellafield Ltd and Dounreay Site Restoration Ltd) meet these stringent We consider that this new approach offers requirements. The plutonium inventory held by the best balance of safety and delivery and NDA is stored in line with the requirements of allows the packages to be treated where there the International Convention on the Physical is the greatest expertise and management Protection of Nuclear Materials. experience. Sellafield Ltd has already developed a number of facilities for handling The stored plutonium can only be used for this material and is in the process of further peaceful purposes, and is managed in strict developing these capabilities to enable the accordance with the UK’s voluntary International delivery of the mission. The NDA will prioritise Safeguards agreements with the International the management and treatment of these Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (ref.2). The materials when they are consolidated at inventory is closely monitored by EURATOM Sellafield. It will take several decades to implement a solution for plutonium. In the meantime, therefore, we have decided to consolidate all of the inventory on one site. 5 STORAGE UNDERPINNING LONG-TERM SAFE AND Store Retreatment Plant, abbreviated to SRP, this SECURE STORAGE facility will repackage, and where appropriate, retreat, all of the plutonium packages. Due to the size of the plutonium inventory, any Based on current estimates this facility is long-term disposition solution will take many expected to become operational in less than decades to implement. In the meantime, the 10 years and to operate for nearly 40 years. NDA strategy is continued storage in a suite of custom-built facilities that ensure its safety and The NDA has evaluated the need for the new security in line with regulatory requirements. repackaging plant, SRP, in the context of the long-term plutonium disposition options under There are a number of plutonium stores on the development and concluded that, irrespective Sellafield site. Over the past decade, materials of which option is chosen, this new capability is have continued to be retrieved from older stores required to ensure continued safe and secure and consolidated in more modern state-of-the storage. art facilities such as the Sellafield Product and Residue Store (SPRS). The aim is to transfer all MANAGEMENT OF LEGACY PLUTONIUM plutonium into the SPRS store and its extensions FACILITIES AND PACKAGES over the next few decades. To ensure that the plutonium packages can be safely stored in The first-generation plutonium plants and stores SPRS, they will be repackaged and, where at Sellafield were built in the 1950s to support appropriate, some plutonium will be treated to reprocessing operations. The NDA considers be made compatible with long-term storage. In some of the older plutonium facilities used for some cases treatment is necessary to remove manufacturing and storage to be amongst the contaminants which can reduce the lifetime of the highest hazards on the Sellafield site, comparable packages. with the legacy ponds and silos facilities (ref. 6 and 7). A major, new specialised facility to repackage materials is required to support this strategy. The condition of some of these plutonium facilities Known as the Sellafield Product and Residues and some of the packages held within, is such 6 STORAGE that urgent action is required to reduce the risk Due to the requirement to reduce risk, and to with them. ensure their continued safe management most of these containers will be repackaged in existing A programme of work was therefore instigated plants. When the new SRP plant becomes to retrieve these materials from older stores and available the contents of these containers will consolidate them in more modern stores, and is be treated and then repackaged into containers now largely complete. suitable for long-term storage in the modern SPRS store. A major programme of asset care has also been undertaken at these legacy facilities to This programme of work is receiving enhanced support operation until they can be taken out regulatory oversight, and Sellafield Ltd is working of service and decommissioned. Sellafield Ltd with the ONR to complete this work promptly. has introduced enhanced package inspections programmes and identified categories of containers, in particular some of the oldest ones, which
Recommended publications
  • Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania

    Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania

    Security and Defence Nuclear Decommissioning (LT) Nuclear Decommissioning Assistance Programme of the Ignalina Nuclear Power Plan in Lithuania Challenge (depending on the waste category), including the completion of the waste management COUNCIL REGULATION The decommissioning of a nuclear installation such as infrastructure where necessary; establishing the nuclear a power plant or research reactor is the final step in 4. implementation of the building demolition decommissioning assistance its lifecycle. It involves activities from shutdown and programme; programme of the Ignalina removal of nuclear material to the environmental nuclear power plant in Lithuania 5. obtaining the decommissioning licence once Unit 1 restoration of the site. The whole process is long and and Unit 2 of the Ignalina nuclear power plant are and repealing Regulation (EU) No complex: it typically takes 20 to 30 years. It is also 1369/2013 defueled; fraught with technical, technological and financiall 6. downgrading of radiological hazards. Council Regulation (EU) 2021/101 challenges. The EU legal framework sets the highest safety standards for all activities regarding nuclear Furthermore, knowledge and experience gained and Period of Application installations, including their decommissioning. lessons learnt under the programme with regard to 2021–2027 the decommissioning process shall be disseminated In application of its Act of Accession to the Union, among Union stakeholders, thus enhancing the EU Lithuania anticipated the shutdown of the two nuclear added value of the programme. reactors in Ignalina within the agreed deadlines (2004 and 2009). RELEVANT WEBSITE FOR MORE Actions INFORMATION The Union committed to provide financial support for The actions to be funded by the Ignalina programme https://europa.eu/!bC66CU the decommissioning, in accordance with approved plans, while keeping the highest level of safety.
  • 小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category

    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category

    小型飛翔体/海外 [Format 2] Technical Catalog Category Airborne contamination sensor Title Depth Evaluation of Entrained Products (DEEP) Proposed by Create Technologies Ltd & Costain Group PLC 1.DEEP is a sensor analysis software for analysing contamination. DEEP can distinguish between surface contamination and internal / absorbed contamination. The software measures contamination depth by analysing distortions in the gamma spectrum. The method can be applied to data gathered using any spectrometer. Because DEEP provides a means of discriminating surface contamination from other radiation sources, DEEP can be used to provide an estimate of surface contamination without physical sampling. DEEP is a real-time method which enables the user to generate a large number of rapid contamination assessments- this data is complementary to physical samples, providing a sound basis for extrapolation from point samples. It also helps identify anomalies enabling targeted sampling startegies. DEEP is compatible with small airborne spectrometer/ processor combinations, such as that proposed by the ARM-U project – please refer to the ARM-U proposal for more details of the air vehicle. Figure 1: DEEP system core components are small, light, low power and can be integrated via USB, serial or Ethernet interfaces. 小型飛翔体/海外 Figure 2: DEEP prototype software 2.Past experience (plants in Japan, overseas plant, applications in other industries, etc) Create technologies is a specialist R&D firm with a focus on imaging and sensing in the nuclear industry. Createc has developed and delivered several novel nuclear technologies, including the N-Visage gamma camera system. Costainis a leading UK construction and civil engineering firm with almost 150 years of history.
  • The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Progress with Reducing Risk at Sellafield

    The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Progress with Reducing Risk at Sellafield

    A picture of the National Audit Office logo Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: progress with reducing risk at Sellafield HC 1126 SESSION 2017–2019 20 JUNE 2018 Our vision is to help the nation spend wisely. Our public audit perspective helps Parliament hold government to account and improve public services. The National Audit Office scrutinises public spending for Parliament and is independent of government. The Comptroller and Auditor General (C&AG), Sir Amyas Morse KCB, is an Officer of the House of Commons and leads the NAO. The C&AG certifies the accounts of all government departments and many other public sector bodies. He has statutory authority to examine and report to Parliament on whether departments and the bodies they fund, nationally and locally, have used their resources efficiently, effectively, and with economy. The C&AG does this through a range of outputs including value-for-money reports on matters of public interest; investigations to establish the underlying facts in circumstances where concerns have been raised by others or observed through our wider work; landscape reviews to aid transparency; and good-practice guides. Our work ensures that those responsible for the use of public money are held to account and helps government to improve public services, leading to audited savings of £734 million in 2016. The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority: progress with reducing risk at Sellafield Report by the Comptroller and Auditor General Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 18 June 2018 This report has been prepared under Section 6 of the National Audit Act 1983 for presentation to the House of Commons in accordance with Section 9 of the Act Sir Amyas Morse KCB Comptroller and Auditor General National Audit Office 15 June 2018 HC 1126 | £10.00 This report examines the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority’s progress with reducing risk and hazard at its largest and most hazardous site, Sellafield.
  • Managing Low Radioactivity Material from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

    Managing Low Radioactivity Material from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

    216 pages 12,88 mm technical reportS series no. This report presents options for the management of decommissioning materials to inform the production of a materials disposition strategy consistent with current IAEA guidance on clearance. It includes a review of the relevant safety, regulatory, technological, economic, social and administrative factors influencing 462 these options. The subject is examined in the context of the value, practicality and viability Technical Reports SeriEs No. 462 of the various disposition options, and the availability of suitable tools, techniques and Managing Low Radioactivity Material from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities instrumentation to monitor compliance with release criteria. Each of the range of disposition options discussed is feasible in principle, and successful applications in Member States are described. Managing Low Radioactivity Material from the Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY VIENNA ISBN 978–92–0–109907–5 ISSN 0074–1914 D462_covI-IV.indd 1 2008-03-19 09:28:52 MANAGING LOW RADIOACTIVITY MATERIAL FROM THE DECOMMISSIONING OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES The following States are Members of the International Atomic Energy Agency: AFGHANISTAN GREECE NORWAY ALBANIA GUATEMALA PAKISTAN ALGERIA HAITI PALAU ANGOLA HOLY SEE PANAMA ARGENTINA HONDURAS PARAGUAY ARMENIA HUNGARY PERU AUSTRALIA ICELAND PHILIPPINES AUSTRIA INDIA POLAND AZERBAIJAN INDONESIA PORTUGAL BANGLADESH IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF QATAR BELARUS IRAQ REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA BELGIUM IRELAND ROMANIA BELIZE
  • Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Business Plan 2018 to 2021

    Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Business Plan 2018 to 2021

    Business Plan 1 April 2018 to 31 March 2021 March 2018 NDA Business Plan 2018 to 2021 . Nuclear Decommissioning Authority Business Plan Financial year beginning April 2018 to fi nancial year ending March 2021 Business Plan presented to Parliament pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Energy Act 2004. Business Plan laid before Scottish Parliament by the Scottish Ministers pursuant to Schedule 3 of the Energy Act 2004. March 2018 SG/2018/36 NDA Business Plan 2018 to 2021 3 © Nuclear Decommissioning Authority copyright 2018 The text of this document (this excludes, where present, the Royal Arms and all departmental or agency logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium provided that it is reproduced accurately and not in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Nuclear Decommissioning Authority copyright and the document title specifi ed. Where third party material has been identifi ed, permission from the respective copyright holder must be sought. Any enquiries related to this publication should be sent to us at: Business Planning Herdus House Westlakes Science & Technology Park Moor Row Cumbria CA24 3HU This publication is available at https://www.gov.uk/government/publications ISBN 978-1-5286-0257-0 CCS0318232456 03/18 Printed on paper containing 75% recycled fi bre content minimum Printed in the UK by APS on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Offi ce Some images supplied courtesy of businesses (sites) and NDA specialist subsidiaries. Every effort is taken to ensure the accuracy of material or images produced or used by the NDA.
  • Decommissioning and Dismantling

    Decommissioning and Dismantling

    Decommissioning and dismantling Jan Willem Storm van Leeuwen independent consultant member of the Nuclear Consulting Group July 2019 [email protected] Note In this document the references are coded by Q-numbers (e.g. Q6). Each reference has a unique number in this coding system, which is consistently used throughout all publications by the author. In the list at the back of the document the references are sorted by Q-number. The resulting sequence is not necessarily the same order in which the references appear in the text. m04decom+dism20190722 1 25 July 2019 Contents 1 Concepts and facts Decommissioning of nuclear power plants: three approaches Complete sequence of decommissioning and dismantling Legacy to be decommissioned and dismantled Radioactivity of reactors and other structures Dismantling of reprocessing plants Uncertain radioisotopic composition 2 Physical assessment Energy investment of decommissioning and dismantling Advanced reference reactor Radioactive waste 3 Practice and experiences Ambiguous definitions of decommissioning and dismantling Dismantled nuclear reactors Decommissioning of the West Valley reprocessing plant Cleanup of the Hanford Site Decommissioning in the UK Canadian NPD Closure Project 4 Costs and liabilities Decommissioning in the USA Decommissioning in the UK French estimate Extrapolation of Greifswald figures Swiss estimate View of the WNA Comments by Reuters Remarks 5 Responsibilities and liabilities: view of the nuclear industry View of the IAEA View of the WNA 6 Preditable problems for the future
  • Sellafield Decommissioning Capability Development

    Sellafield Decommissioning Capability Development

    Decommissioning Capability Development END OF YEAR REPORT 2016-17 Future Decommissioning Project Decommissioning Sellafield Decommissioning • Collaborative working nuclear site is a significant Capability Development within Sellafield Ltd undertaking, expecting has established the Future to communicate the to take over 100 years Decommissioning project decommissioning and cost an estimated which is responsible for challenges and ‘pipeline’ £85billion – a large cost to delivering Research and lower TRL technologies the UK taxpayer. Through Development activities to through to active challenging current enable decommissioning deployment assumptions and delivering to be safer, faster, and • Active demonstration and improved capabilities, there cheaper. integration of technologies is an opportunity to make Focussing primarily on to prove capability in an substantial savings to these near-term (up to 5 years) active environment and long-term predictions. development, the project determine benefits “This year the Future addresses challenges • Industrialise technologies Decommissioning Decommissioning Project spanning the full lifecycle and techniques Supporting the of decommissioning; The assessment of Team has strengthened where appropriate and supply chain Commercially-off- and made a step change in from characterisation and communicate the learning development by the-shelf tools to providing end performance and delivery. Post-Operational Clean to enable the greatest provide business user or intelligent Out (POCO), through to benefit The Team have increased potential for the business customer guidance dismantling and waste both the number and to realise the benefits assay. complexity of active (facilitate business as demonstrators performed, Future Decommissioning’s usual). COLLABORATIVE including the award activities fall into five key This 2016/17 report WORKING TO areas: PROGRESS LOW winning LaserSnake2.
  • Brochure on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

    Brochure on Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities

    Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities 2nd edition 2017 GRS - S - 58 ISBN 978-3-946607-70-0 Decommissioning of Nuclear Facilities Contents 1 Introduction 3 2 Overview 4 2.1 Power and prototype reactors 6 2.2 Research reactors 8 2.3 Nuclear fuel cycle facilities 9 3 Decommissioning strategies 10 4 Stepwise dismantling of a nuclear power plant 12 5 Licensing and supervisory procedures 14 5.1 Legal framework 14 5.2 Licensing procedure 15 5.3 Supervisory procedure 15 6 Safety and radiation protection 16 6.1 Safety considerations 16 6.2 Radiation protection 18 6.3 Reportable events 19 7 Techniques 20 7.1 Decontamination techniques 20 7.2 Dismantling and disassembly techniques 21 7.3 Alternatives to on-site disassembly 23 8 Residue and waste management 23 8.1 Clearance 24 8.2 Decay storage 27 8.3 Radioactive waste 29 9 Costs 30 9.1 Costs of commercially operated nuclear power plants 30 9.2 Costs borne by the public 30 10 International provisions 31 10.1 Convention on spent fuel and nuclear waste management 31 10.2 IAEA 31 10.3 OECD/NEA 31 10.4 EU 31 10.5 WENRA 31 Published by 11 Summary and outlook 32 Gesellschaft für Anlagen- und Reaktorsicherheit (GRS) gGmbH Authors: Boris Brendebach, Gerd Bruhn, Matthias Dewald, 12 Annex 32 Horst May, Sebastian Schneider, Thorsten Stahl 12.1 List on decommissioning of nuclear facilities in Germany 32 12.2 Brief descriptions of selected decommissioning projects 34 This brochure is a translation of the report prepared by GRS on behalf of the BMUB within the framework of project 3616R01310.
  • Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants

    Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants

    Nuclear Development 2016 Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants NEA Nuclear Development Costs of Decommissioning Nuclear Power Plants © OECD 2016 NEA No. 7201 NUCLEAR ENERGY AGENCY ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT The OECD is a unique forum where the governments of 34 democracies work together to address the economic, social and environmental challenges of globalisation. The OECD is also at the forefront of efforts to understand and to help governments respond to new developments and concerns, such as corporate governance, the information economy and the challenges of an ageing population. The Organisation provides a setting where governments can compare policy experiences, seek answers to common problems, identify good practice and work to co-ordinate domestic and international policies. The OECD member countries are: Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan, Korea, Luxembourg, Mexico, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, the United Kingdom and the United States. The European Commission takes part in the work of the OECD. OECD Publishing disseminates widely the results of the Organisation’s statistics gathering and research on economic, social and environmental issues, as well as the conventions, guidelines and standards agreed by its members. This
  • Toward an Evidence-Based Nuclear Energy Policy

    Toward an Evidence-Based Nuclear Energy Policy

    Toward an Evidence-Based Nuclear Energy Policy: What Congress Needs to Know About Nuclear Decommissioning, Radioactive Waste, and Nuclear Energy as a Climate Strategy Tuesday, March 30, 2021 2:00 PM – 3:30 PM EDT Please RSVP to receive updates: www.eesi.org/033021nuclear#rsvp Live webcast will be streamed at: www.eesi.org/livecast The Environmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) invites you to join an online briefing on nuclear energy issues, including the current economics of the U.S. nuclear power industry, how to approach decommissioning as more civilian reactors shut down, and what to do with their high-level radioactive waste. In particular, the briefing will assess the impacts of extending the licenses of existing nuclear plants and pursuing “advanced reactors” as a way to fight climate change. As U.S. nuclear plants age out or become unprofitable, the growing number of shuttered reactors has spawned a new decommissioning business model which promises to remediate sites quickly, but also raises new questions about safety, financial assurance, cleanup standards, and waste disposition. Decommissioning companies want to ship highly radioactive spent fuel through 75% of Congressional districts to their proposed consolidated interim storage facilities (CISFs) in New Mexico and Texas, which overburdened residents there oppose. Congress will likely be asked to change basic provisions of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act this year to enable CISFs. Meanwhile, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is proposing to lengthen the duration of license extensions for operating nuclear plants, potentially allowing them to keep running and generating radioactive waste for more than 80 years. To help inform major decisions on nuclear energy policy facing Congress, the briefing will point out gaps in current research and data, federal policy, and regulatory oversight, and what can be done to fill them.
  • Status Report on Nuclear Power Plants Decommissioning Preparations in Ukraine

    Status Report on Nuclear Power Plants Decommissioning Preparations in Ukraine

    Status report on nuclear power plants decommissioning preparations in Ukraine Kyiv, 2017 Status report on nuclear power plants decommissioning preparations in Ukraine By Iryna Holovko, Olexi Pasyuk, Ecoaction Contacts: E-mail: [email protected] Adress: PO Box 26, Kyiv, 01032 Tel: +38 044 353-78-41 Abstract In Ukraine there are fifteen operating nuclear power units, and Chernobyl nuclear power plant (NPP) in preparation for the decommissioning. There is a legal frame- work put in place which regulates preparations for the decommissioning of nuclear power plants, including financing issues. The operating company is responsible for the decommissioning of operating nuclear power units but not for the final utili- zations of the radioactive waste and not for the decommissioning of Chernobyl NPP. The report provides an overview of the main aspects and current status of the decommissioning preparations – accumulation of the funds, preparation of decomm issioning concepts and plans, progress with the decommissioning of the Chernobyl NPP and with construction of the necessary infrastructure for the radio- active waste management and utilization. This publication has been produced with financial contribution by the Friends of the Earth Norway (Naturvernforbundet). The views herein shall not be taken to reflect the official oppinion of Naturvernforbundet or its donors. Contents 1. Operating nuclear units in Ukraine . 2 2. Chernobyl NPP and its decommissioning process . 5 3. Preparation for the decommissioning of operating nuclear units . 7 3.1. What is nuclear power plant decommissioning? ��������������������������������������� 7 3.2. Status of decommissioning concepts and plans ��������������������������������������� 7 3.3. Problems with the General Concept for the Decommissioning of operating nuclear power plants ����������������������������������������������������������������������� 8 3.4.
  • Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Facilities: It Can and Has Been Done

    Decommissioning of Nuclear Power Facilities: It Can and Has Been Done

    2005 DecommissioningDecommissioning ofof NuclearNuclear PowerPower FacilitiesFacilities It can and has been done One concern commonly expressed about electricity production from nuclear power is that the decommissioning and dismantling to a desirable end state of the redundant radioactive facilities presents a significant problem. In fact, international experience shows that this is not the case. This brochure looks at decommissioning across the spectrum of nuclear power facilities and shows worldwide examples of successful projects. Further information can be found in NEA publications and on a number of websites (see the back of this brochure). Brochure produced by the Working Party on Decommissioning and Dismantling (WPDD) and the Co-operative Programme on Decommissioning (CPD) under the aegis of the OECD/NEA Radioactive Waste Management Committee (RWMC). NUCLEAR•ENERGY•AGENCY ange of plants needed R to generate nuclear energy The diagram shows the plants commonly involved in electricity generation by nuclear means. Uranium ore is mined to produce fuel for power plants ❶. The ore is processed and converted ➋ to a form which enables enrichment ❸ of one particular type (isotope 235). The enriched material is then fabricated into fuel elements ❹ for use in power plants ❺. The used fuel can either be treated as a waste (direct disposal) or can be reprocessed ❻. In reprocessing, reusable uranium and plutonium is extracted for further use as a fuel ❼. ❸❹ ❺ ➋ ❼ ❶ ❻ Result of decommissioning The bulk of scrap materials arising from most decommissioning projects are not radioactive and can be recycled or sent for conventional disposal. Radioactive materials are packaged and sent to radioactive waste disposal facilities (examples: Centre de l’Aube, France, and El Cabril, Spain) or kept in storage where such facilities are not yet available.