DOCSLIB.ORG

Brief on the Merits of Respondent for Fisher V. University of Texas at Austin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brief on the Merits of Respondent for Fisher V. University of Texas at Austin No. 11-345 IN THE Supreme Court of the United States ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, et al., Respondents. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT BRIEF OF THE ADVANCEMENT PROJECT AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS AND URGING AFFIRMANCE TOMIKO BROWN-NAGIN Counsel of Record HARVARD LAW SCHOOL 1585 MASSACHUSETTS AVE. CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 (617) 384-5982 [email protected] LANI GUINIER HARVARD LAW SCHOOL 1585 MASSACHUSETTS AVE. CAMBRIDGE, MA 02138 Counsel for Amicus Curiae The Advancement Project i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 1 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ..................................... 3 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 8 I. UT’S CURRENT ADMISSIONS POLICY REFLECTS THE EVOLUTION OF THE STATE OF TEXAS AND THE UNIVERSITY ITSELF FROM A CLOSED, RACIALLY- EXCLUSIONARY SOCIETY TO A MORE OPEN SOCIETY WHERE THE UNIVERSITY VALUES A MULTIRACIAL CITIZENRY ........................... 8 A. UT Excluded Applicants Solely on Account of Race for Most of Its History .................................................. 12 B. UT and the State of Texas Enforced Segregation and Punished Integrationists Well After Sweatt v. Painter .................................................. 15 C. UT’s Chilly Racial Climate in Recent Years ..................................................... 20 D. UT’s Current Admissions Policy Helps to Redeem its History and to Remedy Vestiges of Segregation ......... 29 II. UT’S FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT- COMPELLED ADMISSIONS POLICIES PROTECT AND PROMOTE “EDUCATIONAL INTANGIBLES” LONG- RECOGNIZED AS CRUCIAL COMPONENTS OF A QUALITY AND EQUAL EDUCATION .................................... 32 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page A. UT’s Policy Promotes Students’ Freedom to Engage in Robust Intellectual Exchange in the Classroom ............................................. 32 CONCLUSION ......................................................... 37 APPENDIX A: MAP OF MONUMENTS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS CAMPUS 2012 ... 1a APPENDIX B: PORTRAIT OF WILLIAM STEWART SIMKINS .................................... 2a APPENDIX C: SIMKINS HALL, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS ..................................................... 3a APPENDIX D: BRASS BUST OF PROFESSOR SIMKINS ....................................................... 4a iii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page(s) CASES Adams v. Richardson, 356 F. Supp. 92 (D.D.C. 1973) ......................... 4, 18 Ash v. Tyson Foods, 546 U.S. 454 (2006) .............................................. 26 Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360 (1964) .............................................. 35 Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) ...................................... passim Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455 (1980) .............................................. 35 DeFunis v. Odegaard, 416 U.S. 312 (1974) ................................................ 3 Fisher v. Texas, 644 F.3d. 301 (5th Cir. 2011) ................................. 5 Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448 (1979) ................................................ 7 Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003) ...................................... passim Florida ex rel. Hawkins v. Board of Control, 350 U.S. 413 (1956) .......................................... 4, 14 Hopwood v. Texas, 78 F.3d 932 (1996) ................................................ 19 Hopwood v. Texas, 861 F. Supp. 551 (W.D. Tex. 1994) ...... 4, 18, 19, 30 iv TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONTINUED) Page(s) Keyishan v. Bd. of Regents of Univ. of State of N.Y., 385 U.S. 589 (1967) .............................................. 35 League of United Latin American Citizens v. Perry, 548 U.S. 399 (2006) .............................................. 11 McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Ed., 339 U.S. 637 (1950) .......................................... 8, 34 NAACP v. Alabama ex rel. Patterson, 357 U.S. 449 (1958) .............................................. 16 NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415 (1963) .............................................. 16 Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73 (1932) .......................................... 10, 16 Nixon v. Herndon, 273 U.S. 536 (1927) .......................................... 9, 16 Parents Involved v. Community Schools, 551 U.S. 701 (2007) ................................................ 6 Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, 438 U.S. 265 (1978) .......................................... 3, 34 Regents of the Univ. of Mich. v. Ewing, 474 U.S. 214 (1985) .............................................. 35 Richmond v. Croson, 488 U.S. 469 (1989) ................................................ 7 v TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONTINUED) Page(s) Rosenberger v. Rector and Visitors of the Univ. of Va., 515 U.S. 819 (1995) .............................................. 35 San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 1 (1973) .................................................. 11 Smith v. Allwright, 321 U.S. 649 (1944) ........................................ 10, 16 Sweatt v. Painter, 210 S.W.2d 442 (Ct. Civ. App. Tex. 1948) ........... 13 Sweatt v. Painter, 339 U.S. 629 (1950) ................................ 4, 8, 14, 33 Terry v. Adams, 345 U.S. 461 (1953) .............................................. 11 United States v. Fordice, 505 U.S. 717 (1992) ...................................... passim White v. Regester, 412 U.S. 755 (1973) .............................................. 11 CONSTITUTIONAL AND STATUTORY PROVISIONS First Amendment ................................................ 16, 35 Fourteenth Amendment ................................ 10, 16, 33 Fifteenth Amendment ............................................... 11 Tex. Const. Art. 7, § 10 .............................................. 12 vi TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONTINUED) Page(s) OTHER AUTHORITIES About Advancement Project, available at http://www.advancementproject.org/about- advancement-project .............................................. 1 Brief of the Family of Heman Sweatt as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents, Fisher v. Texas, No 11-385 (2012) ...................... 13 Brief of Greg Walton and Jerry Kang as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, Fisher v. Texas, No 11-385 (2012) ...................... 32 Brief for Respondents, Fisher v. Texas, No. 11-345 (S. Ct. Aug. 2012) ........................... 3, 7 Brief of Social and Organizational Psychologists as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents, Fisher v. Texas, No. 11-385 (2012) ................................................................... 26 Ben Carrington, Michelle Mott, Vivian Shaw, & Maggie Tate, Trayvon Cartoon Controversy: Reflecting Back, Moving Forward, Daily Texan, May 2, 2012 .................... 26 Compact With Texans, Univ. of Tex. at Austin, available at http://www.utexas.edu/about- ut/compact-with-texans ......................................... 6 A Declaration of the Causes which Impel the State of Texas to Secede from the Federal Union (Feb. 2, 1861), available at http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa _texsec.asp .............................................................. 9 vii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONTINUED) Page(s) Demographic Profile of Hispanics in Texas, 2010, Pew Hispanic Center, http://www.pewhispanic.org/states/state/tx/ ....... 36 DU Law Professor Tom Russell Battles Klan Ghosts in Texas, Law Week Colorado, Jul. 26, 2010, available at http://www.lawweekonline.com/2010/07/du- law-professor-tom-russell-battles-klan- ghosts-in-texas/ .............................................. 28, 29 Liz Farmer, University’s Racial History Traces Back Generations, Daily Texan, May 4, 2012, available at http://www.dailytexanonline.com/universit y/2012/05/04/universitys-racial-history- traces-back-generations ....................................... 13 William Faulkner, Requiem for a Nun (1950) ......... 37 Dwonna Goldstone, Integrating the Forty Acres: The Fifty-Year Struggle for Equality at the University of Texas (2012) ............... passim Jack Greenberg, Crusaders in the Courts 103- 06 (1994) ............................................................... 15 Lani Guinier, From Racial Liberalism to Racial Literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the Interest-Divergence Dilemma, 91 J. Am. Hist. 92 (June 2004) ........... 20 Ralph K.M. Haurwitz, Half-Century Later, UT to Reconsider Naming of Dorm for Klansman, American Statesman, May 20, 2010, available at http://www.statesman.com/news/local/half- century-later-ut-to-reconsider-naming-of- 698255.html. ........................................................ 28 viii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (CONTINUED) Page(s) Channing Holman, Taking Strides To Make the World Change, Daily Texan, May 1, 2012, available at http://www.dailytexanonline.com/columns/2 012/05/01/taking-strides-make-world- change ................................................................... 24 Gilbert Jonas, Freedom’s Sword (2005) .................... 15 Gary M. Lavergne, Before Brown: Heman Marion Sweatt, Thurgood Marshall, and the Long Road to Justice (2012) .............. 12, 13, 14 Douglas Laycock, The Broader Case for Affirmative Action: Desegregation, Academic Excellence, and Future Leadership, 78 Tul. L. Rev. 1767 (2004) ............ 31 Douglas Laycock, Hopwood v. Texas Litigation Documents, TarltonGuides (Nov. 2001), available at http://tarltonguides.law.utexas.edu/content .php?pid=98968&sid=772237 .......................... 4, 19 Karen Nichol LeCompte & O. L. Davis, Jr., Establishment of Academic
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Marshall News Vol 3 Issue 3 Feb 2007
    TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY VOLUME 3 ISSUE 3 Marshall News M ARCH 19, 2007 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: Black History Month — Meet the Law Library 2 Staff Remembering Our Past Clerkship Crash Course 3 April Walker, ‘85 The House Sweatt Built 4 February is dedicated to promoting the Carl Walker, Jr. '55 magnificent contributions that African Fad Wilson, Jr. ‘74 Poetry Contest 5 Americans have given to our society. Linda Renya Yanez, ‘76 ProDoc 5.1 6 The Law Library remembers the current Members of the legislatures that and former members of the judiciary that came from our ranks include: Let the Games Begin 7 came from the ranks of Thurgood Mar- Present & Former State Legislature Student Survey 8 shall School of Law. Archid L. Cofer, ‘74 Robert Lee Anderson, ‘70 Harold Dutton, ‘91 James Neal Barkley, ‘75 Antonio Garcia, ‘70 ton, Texas Weldon H. Berry, ‘52 James P.C. Hopkins,’67 Iris Jones, '77, first African Ameri- Calvin Botley, ‘72 Sam Hudson, ‘67 can and woman appointed City At- Beradelin L. Brashear, ‘67 Senfronia Thompson, ‘77 torney in Austin, Texas Durrey Edward Davis, ‘54 United States Legislature Raymond Jordan ‘62 Board of Ex- Henry Doyle, ‘50 Craig Washington, ‘69 aminers Bonnie Fitch, ‘74 Some other distinguished alumni that Donald Floyd, ‘72 came from our ranks include: Mark McDonald ‘62 first African Richard H. Garcia, ‘73 American appointed to the Board of John Crump, '70, Exe Director, NBA Sylvia Garcia, ‘91 Examiners & former President NBA. Harrison M. Gregg, Jr., ‘71 Al Green, President, NAACP, Hous- Ruben Guerrero, ‘76 Belinda Hill, '82 Kenneth Hoyt, ‘72 Carolyn Day Hobson, ‘70 Shirley Hunter, ‘76 Faith Simmons Johnson,'80 Mereda D.
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher's Guide
    1 PARALLEL AND CROSSOVER LIVES: TEXAS BEFORE AND AFTER DESEGREGATION SECTION GOES HERE 1 Texas Council the for HUMANITIES presents PARALLEL AND CROSSOVER LIVES: Texas Before and After Segregation Welcome! This education package contains: Videotape Highlights two oral history interviews created through the Texas Council for the Humanities program, Parallel and Crossover Lives: Texas Before and After Desegregation. The video includes two separate oral history interview sessions: one conducted in Austin, Texas (approximately 25 minutes), the other in the small east Texas town of Hawkins (approximately 50 minutes). In these interviews, African-American and Anglo students, teachers, and school administrators describe the roles they played in the history of school desegregation in Texas. Introduction Dr. Glenn Linden, Dedman College Associate Professor of History, Southern Methodist University, and author of Desegregating Schools in Dallas: Four Decades in the Federal Courts. Teacher’s Guide prepared by Carol Schelnk Video discussion guide Classroom Extension Activities with links to related online URLS These activities were designed for use with high school students, but may be modified for middle school students. Vocabulary National and Texas state curriculum standards Educator feedback form Complete and returned to Texas Council for the Humanities Please visit our Parallel and Crossover Lives website at www.public-humanities.org/desegregation.html 2 PARALLEL AND CROSSOVER LIVES: TEXAS BEFORE AND AFTER DESEGREGATION INTRODUCTION 3 Introduction The Supreme Court’s momentous Brown vs. Board of Education decision mandating During the same years, the state of Texas wrestled with its response to the federal an end to “separate but equal” public education changed forever the entire fabric of demands for desegregation.
    [Show full text]
  • Student Viewing Guide
    YEZ yez OH YAY! Viewing Guide: Sweatt v. Painter (1950) The Background of the Case (00:00-2:25) 1. What did the Texas Constitution of 1876 say about segregation and separate but equal with regards to education? 2. What group had achieved some progress in the courts to end segregation in public schools? 3. At this time, what two leaders in the NAACP were determined to dismantle and end segregation? Stop and Think: Why do you think that the NAACP concentrated on ending segregation in public education? Heman Sweatt (2:26-6:10) 4. Who was Heman Sweatt and what did he do? Who was Theophilus Painter and what role did he play in the controversy? 5. What did the Texas Legislature do in response to Mr. Sweatt’s lawsuit? 6. Why did Mr. Sweatt continue his lawsuit against the University of Texas even after the Texas Legislature and the University of Texas had attempted to solve the issue? Stop and Think: Would you have been satisfied with the solution to the issue offered by the Texas Legislature and the University of Texas Law School? Why or why not? Question brought to the Supreme Court (6:11-7:39) 7. What was the question that the Supreme Court had to answer in this case? [Formula for issue=Yes/No question + facts of the case + part of the U.S. Constitution in question] © State Bar of Texas 8. What were the two arguments used by Sweatt’s attorneys in arguing the case? Stop and Think: What did the attorney mean when he said they hoped to “cut the roots out of segregation”? The Ruling (7:40-10:20) 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Book-Joint Board of Directors & BOR-July 14, 2010
    AGENDA for Meeting of the U. T. System Board of Regents July 14 -15, 2010 Board Room, 9th Floor, Ashbel Smith Hall Austin, Texas Wednesday, July 14, 2010 Page Note: UTIMCO Board of Directors’ Meeting 8:00 -11:00 a.m. A. CONVENE JOINT MEETING: BOARD OF REGENTS AND 11:30 a.m. THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT COMPANY (UTIMCO) BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR A PRE- MEETING LUNCH Ashbel Smith Hall, 2nd Floor Conference Room B. RECONVENE JOINT MEETING TO CONSIDER AGENDA ITEMS 12:30 p.m. Ashbel Smith Hall, 9th Floor Board Room Chairman McHugh, Board of Regents Chairman Foster, Board of Directors 1. Introductions 12:30 p.m. 1 UTIMCO Directors; U. T. System and UTIMCO Oversight Staff; Chairman Foster External Advisors: Legal, Audit, Investments, Risk Management 2. Briefing on fiduciary responsibilities 12:40 p.m. Report 2 Mr. Burgdorf 3. Discussion of U. T. System financial resources 12:45 p.m. Report/Discussion 8 Dr. Kelley 4. UTIMCO governance 12:55 p.m. Report 20 Introduction Chairman Foster Audit and Ethics Committee Chairman Foster Risk Committee Chairman Tate Policy Committee Chairman Longoria Compensation Committee Chairman Ferguson 5. Report on investment performance 1:15 p.m. Report 22 Mr. Bruce Myers, Cambridge Associates Mr. Zimmerman i Wednesday, July 14, 2010 (continued) Page 6. Update on the UTIMCO organization including investment 1:30 p.m. manager activity and expenses Report/Discussion 39 Mr. Zimmerman 7. Discussion of trends in investment management 1:40 p.m. Report/Discussion 47 Dr. Keith Brown 8. Discussion of investment portfolio and strategy 1:50 p.m.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law Jose R
    Nova Southeastern University From the SelectedWorks of Jose R. "Beto" Juarez 2010 Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law Jose R. "Beto" Juarez, Nova Southeastern University Available at: https://works.bepress.com/jose- juarez/3/ DATE DOWNLOADED: Mon Nov 2 14:12:36 2020 SOURCE: Content Downloaded from HeinOnline Citations: Bluebook 21st ed. Jose Roberto Juarez Jr., Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law, 52 S. TEX. L. REV. 85 (2010). ALWD 6th ed. Juarez, J. ., Recovering texas history: Tejanos, jim crow, lynchings & the university of texas school of law, 52(1) S. Tex. L. Rev. 85 (2010). APA 7th ed. Juarez, J. (2010). Recovering texas history: Tejanos, jim crow, lynchings & the university of texas school of law. South Texas Law Review, 52(1), 85-100. Chicago 7th ed. Jose Roberto Juarez Jr., "Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law," South Texas Law Review 52, no. 1 (Fall 2010): 85-100 McGill Guide 9th ed. Jose Roberto Juarez Jr, "Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law" (2010) 52:1 S Tex L Rev 85. MLA 8th ed. Juarez, Jose Roberto Jr. "Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law." South Texas Law Review, vol. 52, no. 1, Fall 2010, p. 85-100. HeinOnline. OSCOLA 4th ed. Jose Roberto Juarez Jr, 'Recovering Texas History: Tejanos, Jim Crow, Lynchings & the University of Texas School of Law' (2010) 52 S Tex L Rev 85 Provided by: NSU Shepard Broad College of Law Panza Maurer Law Library -- Your use of this HeinOnline PDF indicates your acceptance of HeinOnline's Terms and Conditions of the license agreement available at https://heinonline.org/HOL/License -- The search text of this PDF is generated from uncorrected OCR text.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncovering the Case of Sweatt V. Painter and Its Legal Importance
    History in the Making Volume 4 Article 6 2011 Whatever Means Necessary: Uncovering the Case of Sweatt v. Painter and Its Legal Importance Adam Scott Miller CSUSB Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making Recommended Citation Miller, Adam Scott (2011) "Whatever Means Necessary: Uncovering the Case of Sweatt v. Painter and Its Legal Importance," History in the Making: Vol. 4 , Article 6. Available at: https://scholarworks.lib.csusb.edu/history-in-the-making/vol4/iss1/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Arthur E. Nelson University Archives at CSUSB ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in History in the Making by an authorized editor of CSUSB ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Adam Scott Miller Whatever Means Necessary: Uncovering the Case of Sweatt v Painter and Its Legal Importance BY ADAM SCOTT MILLER Abstract: The road to end segregation in the United States has been a long uphill battle for African Americans. The purpose of this paper serves several critical purposes. The first function is to educate the reader about the legal struggles that African Americans endured between the era of Reconstruction and the Supreme Court desegregating graduate school case of Sweatt v. Painter in 1950. Not only was this elusive case an important stepping stone in reversing the “Separate but Equal Doctrine” upheld by the Supreme Court in 1886, this case shows the lengths that segregationists went to in maintaining the status quo of racial separation. Finally, this paper will demonstrate the legal relevance that Sweatt v.
    [Show full text]
  • Mcnay ART MUSEUM 2013 | 2015 Annual Report Visitors Enjoy a Free Family John and Peg Emley with Bill Chiego at the Margaritaville at the Day at the Mcnay
    McNAY ART MUSEUM 2013 | 2015 Annual Report Visitors enjoy a free family John and Peg Emley with Bill Chiego at the Margaritaville at the day at the McNay. McNay Spring Party. Lesley Dill and René Paul Barilleaux, Chief Curator/Curator of Contemporary Art, at the Opening of Lesley Dill: Performance as Art. McNay Second Thursday band plays indie tunes on the Brown Sculpture Terrace. Visitors enjoy a free family day at the McNay. Emma and Toby Calvert at the 60th Sarah E. Harte and John Gutzler at the 60th Anniversary Celebration Anniversary Celebration Visitor enjoys field day activities during a free A local food truck serves up delicious dishes at McNay Second Suhail Arastu at the McNay Gala Hollywood Visions: Dressing the Part. family day at the McNay. Thursdays. Table of Contents Board of Trustees As of December 31, 2015 Letter from the President ................................................................................4 Tom Frost, Chairman Sarah E. Harte, President Letter from the Director ...................................................................................5 Connie McCombs McNab, Vice President Museum Highlights ...........................................................................................6 Lucille Oppenheimer Travis, Secretary Barbie O’Connor, Treasurer Notable Staff Accomplishments ...................................................................10 Toby Calvert Acquisitions ..........................................................................................................13 John W. Feik
    [Show full text]
  • Struggle and Success Page I the Development of an Encyclopedia, Whether Digital Or Print, Is an Inherently Collaborative Process
    Cover Image: The Texas African American History Memorial Monument located at the Texas State Capitol, Austin, Texas. Copyright © 2015 by Texas State Historical Association All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the publisher, addressed “Attention: Permissions,” at the address below. Texas State Historical Association 3001 Lake Austin Blvd. Suite 3.116 Austin, TX 78703 www.tshaonline.org IMAGE USE DISCLAIMER All copyrighted materials included within the Handbook of Texas Online are in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107 related to Copyright and “Fair Use” for Non-Profit educational institutions, which permits the Texas State Historical Association (TSHA), to utilize copyrighted materials to further scholarship, education, and inform the public. The TSHA makes every effort to conform to the principles of fair use and to comply with copyright law. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond fair use, you must obtain permission from the copyright owner. Dear Texas History Community, Texas has a special place in history and in the minds of people throughout the world. Texas symbols such as the Alamo, oil wells, and even the shape of the state, as well as the men and women who worked on farms and ranches and who built cities convey a sense of independence, self-reliance, hard work, and courage.
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Bibliography
    ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY PRIMARY SOURCES “The 13th Street Law School.” Before Brown: Heman Marion Sweatt, Thurgood Marshall, and the Long Road to Justice, University of Texas Press, 2010. This is an image of “the basement school” as referred to by Thurgood Marshall. The school was established to satisfy the order of Judge Archer, who later found the school to be “substantially equal” to the University of Texas Law School. “African American Woman Hard at Work” Venable, Rose. The Civil Rights Movement: Journey to Freedom. Childs World, 2010. This photo shows a black woman working very hard for little to no pay. Even after slavery was abolished, African-Americans were not treated equally or fairly, and they were not accepted as the free citizens they were supposed to be. One cause of this was the Jim Crow Laws, which would have an impact on our nation for many years. “Appeal Filed in Sweatt Case.” The Kilgore News Herald, 30 Sept. 1947, pp. 1–1. This newspaper article was written about Heman Sweatt’s appeal to the Third Court of Civil Appeals. The publicity that Heman Sweatt received made him a hero to other African-Americans but a villain to those fighting against integration and equalization. Benoit, Reese, and Dale Wainwright. “Interview with Former Texas Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright.” 10 Mar. 2020. Dale Wainwright is a former Texas Supreme Court Justice. Justice Wainwright participated in a moot argument of Sweatt v. Painter in which he argued the case on behalf of Heman Sweatt, just as Thurgood Marshall did. In preparation, he thoroughly researched the Sweatt case, and the knowledge he shared greatly benefited my project.
    [Show full text]
  • Eldred J. Simkins Papers: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf7c6005p1 No online items Eldred J. Simkins Papers: Finding Aid Processed by The Huntington Library staff in April 1982; supplementary encoding and revision supplied by Xuzhi Zhou in 2002 and Diann Benti in June 2017. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © 2000 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Eldred J. Simkins Papers: Finding mssSIM 1-475 1 Aid Overview of the Collection Title: Eldred J. Simkins Papers Dates (inclusive): 1842-1977 Bulk dates: 1842-1929 Collection Number: mssSIM 1-475 Creator: Simkins, Eldred James, 1838-1903. Extent: Approximately 475 pieces in 10 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2129 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: This collection chiefly contains the correspondence of the family of lawyer and Texas state senator Eldred J. Simkins (1838-1903). Subjects discussed include the California Gold Rush and life in Mariposa County, Calif., during the 1850s and 1870s; the Civil War in Charleston, South Carolina, from a confederate soldier's point of view; life in South Carolina and Florida after the Civil War; and life in Austin and Corsicana, Texas, during the 19th and early 20th centuries. Language: English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Family of Heman Sweatt As Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents
    NO. 14-981 In the Supreme Court of the United States ABIGAIL NOEL FISHER, Petitioner, v. UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN, et al., Respondents. On Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit BRIEF OF THE FAMILY OF HEMAN SWEATT AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS Allan Van Fleet Counsel of Record Nicholas Grimmer McDermott Will & Emery LLP 1000 Louisiana, Suite 3900 Houston, Texas 77002-5005 (713) 653-1703 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae Family of Heman Sweatt Hemella Sweatt-Duplechan, M.D. James Leonard Sweatt III, M.D. Heman Marion Sweatt II Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES.................. iii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ............. 1 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT ............................ 2 ARGUMENT............................... 5 I. SWEATT V. PAINTER .................. 5 A. Sweatt’s Application and Painter’s Response .......................... 5 B.Sweatt’s Many Dimensions............ 7 C. Sweatt’s Suit and the “Basement School”........................... 10 D. The Trial of Intangibles and the Interplay of Ideas...........................12 E. This Court’s Opinions of June 5, 1950 . 14 II. SWEATT’S LIFE AND LEGACY AFTER SWEATT V. PAINTER ................. 17 A.Sweatt at UT...................... 17 B.Sweatt at the Urban League ......... 17 C.Sweatt’s Legacy.................... 18 III. SEGREGATION IN TEXAS EDUCATION . 20 A. A Brief History of Discrimination in Texas Education ................... 20 B. Resegregation of Texas Public Schools . 24 ii IV. THE LESSONS OF SWEATT V. PAINTER .28 A.The Importance of Diversity.......... 28 B.The Importance of the Individual...... 32 C.The Importance of Race ............
    [Show full text]
  • Panther Newspapers Publications
    Prairie View A&M University Digital Commons @PVAMU PV Panther Newspapers Publications 2-1947 Panther - February 1947 - Vol. XXI No. 3 Prairie View University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/pv-panther-newspapers Recommended Citation Prairie View University. (1947). Panther - February 1947 - Vol. XXI No. 3., Vol. XXI No. 3 Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.pvamu.edu/pv-panther-newspapers/808 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Publications at Digital Commons @PVAMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in PV Panther Newspapers by an authorized administrator of Digital Commons @PVAMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOPHOMORE ISSUE VOLUME 21 PRAIRIE VIEW UNIVERSITY, PRAIRIE VIEW BRANCH, HE MPSTEAD, TEXAS, FEBRUARY, 1947 NUMBER 3 PROMINENT ALUMNUS MAKES GIFT TO PRAIRIE VIEW MISS LILLIAN BROWN CROWNED AT GALA PANTHER CORONATION BALL The crowning of Miss Lillian quets of red roses. The princes Marie Brown was the prevailing were formally attired. The flower feature of the fifteenth annual girls were daintily gowned in sheer Coronation Ball sponsored Satur­ net, miniature princess-like dresses day evening, January 25 in the and carried baskets of rose petals University Auditorium by the which were strewn along the line Panther executive staff of Prairie of the procession as a signal for View. Miss Brown, the daughter the queens's appearance. The of Mr. and Mrs. Ernest Brown of Crown-bearer was regally clothed Houston, Texas, was deemed "Miss in a rich white suit. Prairie View" for 1946-47 in Octo­ The beautiful bronze queen made ber 1946, when she was declared her stately entrance as the organ­ winner of the "Miss Prairie View" ist played soft strains of the Cor­ drive.
    [Show full text]