On the Governance of Regional Innovation Systems
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Mandaterechner Wie Groß Wird Der Bundestag?
#Mandaterechner Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ausgabe 1 | 2021 Wie groß wird der Bundestag? Ergebnisse einer Projektionsrechnung Robert Vehrkamp WIE GROSS WIRD DER BUNDESTAG? – ERGEBNISSE EINER PROJEKTIONSRECHNUNG Impressum © Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh Juli 2021 Verantwortlich Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Christina Tillmann Inhaltliche Mitarbeit Lars Bischoff Matthias Moehl Autor Redaktionelle Unterstützung Gaëlle Beckmann Dr. Robert Vehrkamp Sandra Stratos ist Senior Advisor der Bertelsmann Stiftung im Programm „Zukunft der Demokratie“ und war Gast- Gestaltung wissenschaftler der Abteilung „Demokratie und Demo- Markus Diekmann, Bielefeld kratisierung“ am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB). Im Juni 2021 wurde er als Sachverständiger in die Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages zur Reform des Bundeswahlrechts und zur Modernisierung der DOI 10.11586/2021065 Parlamentsarbeit berufen. [email protected] 2 WAS IST UND WAS KANN DER #MANDATERECHNER? Was ist und was kann der #Mandaterechner? Mit dem #Mandaterechner lassen sich Projek- Der #Mandaterechner erweitert damit bisher vor- tionsrechnungen zur Größe des Bundestages nach liegende Berechnungsmodelle um die Variable des der Bundestagswahl 2021 durchführen. Auf der Splittingverhaltens. Anstatt mit einer konkreten Grundlage des aktuellen Umfragetrends und in Annahme über das Splittingverhalten zu arbeiten Abhängigkeit von konkreten Annahmen über das und die Größe des Bundestages dann in Abhän- Splittingverhalten der Wähler:innen zwischen gigkeit vom Zweitstimmenergebnis zu berechnen, -
The Iron Rhine (Ijzeren Rijn) Arbitration (Belgium- Netherlands) Award of 2005
springer.com Law : Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration Mcmahon, Belinda (Ed.) The Iron Rhine (IJzeren Rijn) Arbitration (Belgium- Netherlands) Award of 2005 With an Introduction by Colin Warbrick, Professor of Public International Law at the University of Birmingham, UK and a Foreword by Tjaco T. van den Hout, Secretary-General of the Permanent Court of Arbitration The Iron Rhine Arbitration (or “IJzeren Rijn” as it is known in Dutch) (2005) decided a dispute between the Kingdom of Belgium and the Kingdom of The Netherlands concerning the reactivation of the Iron Rhine railway linking the Port of Antwerp, Belgium, to the Rhine Basin in Germany across certain parts of Dutch territory. The Arbitral T.M.C. Asser Press Tribunal was called upon to interpret nineteenth century treaties, which granted certain rights to Belgium on the territory of The Netherlands, and to consider the entitlement of The 1st Edition., X, 318 p. 1st Netherlands to insist on conditions specified under Dutch law, particularly with respect to edition environmental protection, for reactivation of the railway. This unique bi-lingual edition comprises the official English version of the Award rendered in the Iron Rhine Arbitration, and a French translation. In a perceptive introduction, Colin Warbrick, Professor of Public Printed book International Law at the University of Birmingham, has considered the Award in the context of Hardcover its contribution to international and European Community law issues. As Professor Warbrick remarks, the significance of this case -
Trainini Model Railroad Magazine
October 2020 Volume 16 • Issue 183 International Edition Free, electronic magazine for railroad enthusiasts in the scale 1:220 and Prototype www.trainini.eu Published monthly Trainini no guarantee German Magazine for Z G auge ISSN 2512-8035 Along the Ruhr and the Diemel Railway Lines along Wine Mountainsides A German Oddity Trainini ® International Edition German Magazine for Z Gauge Introduction Dear Readers, If I were to find a headline for this issue that could summarise (almost) all the articles, it would probably have to read as follows: “Travels through German lands”. That sounds almost a bit poetic, which is not even undesirable: Our articles from the design section invite you to dream or help you to make others dream. Holger Späing Editor-in-chief With his Rhosel layout Jürgen Wagner has created a new work in which the landscape is clearly in the foreground. His work was based on the most beautiful impressions he took from the wine-growing regions along the Rhein and Mosel (Rhine and Moselle). At home he modelled them. We like the result so much that we do not want to withhold it from our readers! We are happy and proud at the same time to be the first magazine to report on it. Thus, we are today, after a short break in the last issue, also continuing our annual main topic. We also had to realize that the occurrence of infections has queered our pitch. As a result, we have not been able to take pictures of some of the originally planned layouts to this day, and many topics have shifted and are now threatening to conglomerate towards the end of the year. -
Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001
ICPSR 2683 Comparative Study of Electoral Systems, 1996-2001 Virginia Sapiro W. Philips Shively Comparative Study of Electoral Systems 4th ICPSR Version February 2004 Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research P.O. Box 1248 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106 www.icpsr.umich.edu Terms of Use Bibliographic Citation: Publications based on ICPSR data collections should acknowledge those sources by means of bibliographic citations. To ensure that such source attributions are captured for social science bibliographic utilities, citations must appear in footnotes or in the reference section of publications. The bibliographic citation for this data collection is: Comparative Study of Electoral Systems Secretariat. COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ELECTORAL SYSTEMS, 1996-2001 [Computer file]. 4th ICPSR version. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Center for Political Studies [producer], 2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2004. Request for Information on To provide funding agencies with essential information about use of Use of ICPSR Resources: archival resources and to facilitate the exchange of information about ICPSR participants' research activities, users of ICPSR data are requested to send to ICPSR bibliographic citations for each completed manuscript or thesis abstract. Visit the ICPSR Web site for more information on submitting citations. Data Disclaimer: The original collector of the data, ICPSR, and the relevant funding agency bear no responsibility for uses of this collection or for interpretations or inferences based upon such uses. Responsible Use In preparing data for public release, ICPSR performs a number of Statement: procedures to ensure that the identity of research subjects cannot be disclosed. Any intentional identification or disclosure of a person or establishment violates the assurances of confidentiality given to the providers of the information. -
UNIVERSITY of COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 UNIVERSITY of COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 Contents
UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE Annual Report 2016 Contents Foreword 5 Highlights 2016 6 Research 10 Teaching 38 University and Society 56 Honours 66 Personnel 76 Infrastructure 88 Governance 96 Donations 114 List of Abbreviations 119 Publication Details 120 University of Cologne Foreword 6 | 7 Professor Dr Axel Freimuth With its educational mandate and as an engine for research and innovation, the University of Cologne is making a major contribution to the development of our society. Universities stand for new ideas and current scientific developments and opportunities and makes it possib- change, often coming from a com- firmly embedded in social discourse. le for us to become involved in a pletely unexpected direction. They Our dynamic international network diverse range of areas. Moreover, are an engine for research and in- – with 85 partner universities and I would like to thank our many fri- novation and help to solve pressing more than 500 Faculty partnerships ends and benefactors as well as problems in our society. Moreover, – as well as the international and di- our collaboration partners for their they are in increasing demand as verse life on campus create a cosmo- continuous and generous support. educational institutions: Today, one politan and stimulating atmosphere Their commitment helps to stimula- in two young people in Germany and excellent opportunities for aca- te social discourse with and within starts a degree programme. Besi- demic exchange. our university, thus creating a fer- des preparing our students for a tile environment for contemporary professional career, the UoC’s stu- This Annual Report provides infor- research and teaching. -
The Example of the Middle Lower Rhine Region
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Hamm, Rüdiger Conference Paper The Effects of European Monetary Union for Special Regions - The Example of Middle Lower Rhine 39th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Cohesion and Competitiveness in 21st Century Europe", August 23 - 27, 1999, Dublin, Ireland Provided in Cooperation with: European Regional Science Association (ERSA) Suggested Citation: Hamm, Rüdiger (1999) : The Effects of European Monetary Union for Special Regions - The Example of Middle Lower Rhine, 39th Congress of the European Regional Science Association: "Regional Cohesion and Competitiveness in 21st Century Europe", August 23 - 27, 1999, Dublin, Ireland, European Regional Science Association (ERSA), Louvain-la-Neuve This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/114423 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. -
Green Economy Report North Rhine-Westphalia 2015 Management Summary
Green Economy Report North Rhine-Westphalia 2015 Management Summary www.umwelt.nrw.de 2 umweltwirtschaft.nrw.de 3 4 5 Contents 1 Management Summary 7 1.1 A groundbreaking sector: North Rhine-Westphalia’s green economy 7 1.2 Multi-sector encompassing: The green economy 8 1.3 Sub-markets of the green economy in North Rhine-Westphalia 11 1.4 How important is the green economy for North Rhine-Westphalia? 14 1.5 The regional action fields 17 Imprint 23 6 1 Management Summary 7 7 Management Summary 1 Management Summary 1.1 A groundbreaking sector: North Rhine-Westphalia’s green economy North Rhine-Westphalia is Germany’s largest provider of green economy goods and services. Moreover, the fact that this industry employs a workforce of around 319,000 in North Rhine-Westphalia, underscores its role as a significant economic factor. Boasting about 4.7 % of North Rhine-Westphalia’s economic output, the green economy already plays a more important role in the market than conventional key industries, such as machine engi- neering, automakers and the chemical industry. As a multi-sector industry, it does comprise some of the former activities, which is why the green economy does offer opportunities for established enterprises in a variety of sectors and simultaneously paves the way for innovative start-ups in a wide range of markets. Left: Part of recycling boiler at a cellulose factory. Right: An energy consultant completing a blower door measurement. North Rhine-Westphalia’s green economy is growing. From 2009 to 2012, it added 5.4 % more jobs than the overall economy of North Rhine-Westphalia. -
DLA Piper. Details of the Member Entities of DLA Piper Are Available on the Website
EUROPEAN PPP REPORT 2009 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This Report has been published with particular thanks to: The EPEC Executive and in particular, Livia Dumitrescu, Goetz von Thadden, Mathieu Nemoz and Laura Potten. Those EPEC Members and EIB staff who commented on the country reports. Each of the contributors of a ‘View from a Country’. Line Markert and Mikkel Fritsch from Horten for assistance with the report on Denmark. Andrei Aganimov from Borenius & Kemppinen for assistance with the report on Finland. Maura Capoulas Santos and Alberto Galhardo Simões from Miranda Correia Amendoeira & Associados for assistance with the report on Portugal. Gustaf Reuterskiöld and Malin Cope from DLA Nordic for assistance with the report on Sweden. Infra-News for assistance generally and in particular with the project lists. All those members of DLA Piper who assisted with the preparation of the country reports and finally, Rosemary Bointon, Editor of the Report. Production of Report and Copyright This European PPP Report 2009 ( “Report”) has been produced and edited by DLA Piper*. DLA Piper acknowledges the contribution of the European PPP Expertise Centre (EPEC)** in the preparation of the Report. DLA Piper retains editorial responsibility for the Report. In contributing to the Report neither the European Investment Bank, EPEC, EPEC’s Members, nor any Contributor*** indicates or implies agreement with, or endorsement of, any part of the Report. This document is the copyright of DLA Piper and the Contributors. This document is confidential and personal to you. It is provided to you on the understanding that it is not to be re-used in any way, duplicated or distributed without the written consent of DLA Piper or the relevant Contributor. -
Wahlkreise Nach Parteien Und Zweitstimmenanteil
Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd. Wahlkreis Länder- Zweitstimmen in % Nr. kennzeichen 2009 2005 SPD 001 124 Gelsenkirchen NW 42,0 53,8 002 117 Duisburg II NW 40,7 55,3 003 142 Herne - Bochum II NW 40,2 54,0 004 118 Oberhausen - Wesel III NW 39,4 53,9 005 120 Essen II NW 39,0 51,5 006 025 Aurich - Emden NI 38,8 55,9 007 145 Unna I NW 37,6 50,3 008 126 Bottrop - Recklinghausen III NW 37,1 50,4 009 123 Recklinghausen II NW 36,8 51,4 010 141 Bochum I NW 36,3 49,2 011 116 Duisburg I NW 36,3 49,9 012 144 Dortmund II NW 35,6 50,8 013 119 Mülheim - Essen I NW 35,6 47,6 014 122 Recklinghausen I NW 35,5 50,7 015 140 Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis II NW 34,9 47,2 016 136 Lippe I NW 34,5 43,1 017 170 Werra-Meißner - Hersfeld-Rotenburg HE 34,4 45,3 018 050 Salzgitter - Wolfenbüttel NI 34,2 47,7 019 171 Schwalm-Eder HE 33,9 45,0 020 146 Hamm - Unna II NW 33,4 47,9 021 047 Hameln-Pyrmont - Holzminden NI 33,4 47,4 022 168 Waldeck HE 33,0 44,1 023 053 Goslar - Northeim - Osterode NI 33,0 45,9 024 143 Dortmund I NW 33,0 48,2 025 041 Nienburg II - Schaumburg NI 33,0 47,0 026 134 Herford - Minden-Lübbecke II NW 32,9 40,7 027 139 Hagen - Ennepe-Ruhr-Kreis I NW 32,9 45,8 028 049 Hildesheim NI 32,9 47,0 029 046 Gifhorn - Peine NI 32,9 46,4 030 048 Hannover-Land II NI 32,8 46,8 Endgültiges Ergebnis der Bundestagswahl 2009 9 Wahlkreise nach Parteien und Zweitstimmenanteil Lfd. -
Lehrstuhl Werkstoffwissenschaft
INSTITUT FÜR WERKSTOFFE 2011 Institute for Materials – 2006 CIENCE S aterials M for HAIR C ISSENSCHAFT W WERKSTOFF L LEHRSTUH Kt ontak / Contact: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Gunther Eggeler LEHRSTUHL Lehrstuhl Werkstoffwissenschaft Ruhr-Universität Bochum D-44780 Bochum WERKSTOFFWISSENSCHAFT Tel.: +49 (0) 234 32 23022 Fax : +49 (0) 234 32 14235 CHAIR FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE E-Mail: [email protected] www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ww Umschlagdesign: jungepartner.de 2006 – 2011 INSTITUT FÜR WERKSTOFFE Institute for Materials LEHRSTUHL WERKSTOFFWISSENSCHAFT CHAIR FOR MATERIALS SCIENCE 2006 – 2011 2006 – 2011 BEITRÄGE ZU FORSCHUNG UND LEHRE CONTRIBUTIONS to Research AND Teaching Übersichtsbericht Overview Summary bearbeitet von / by: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Gunther Eggeler und Mitarbeitern / and co-workers Übersetzung ins Englische / Translation: M. Larby (JP Translations, www.jptranslations.com) Bochum, Dezember 2011 Kt ontak / Contact: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Gunther Eggeler · Lehrstuhl Werkstoffwissenschaft · Ruhr-Universität Bochum D-44780 Bochum · Tel.: +49 (0) 234 32 23022 · Fax : +49 (0) 234 32 14235 E-Mail: [email protected] · www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ww Vorbemerkung/Preface I Vorbemerkung Preface Hier wird über die Aktivitäten des Lehr- This report describes the activities of the stuhls Werkstoffwissenschaft (www.ruhr- Chair for Materials Science and Engi- uni-bochum.de/ww) im Zeitraum von neering (www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ww) 2006 bis 2011 berichtet. Der Lehrstuhl and covers the period from 2006 until Werkstoffwissenschaft gehört zum Institut 2011. The Chair for Materials Science für Werkstoffe der Ruhr-Universität Bo- and Engineering is part of the Institute for chum. Das Institut für Werkstoffe ist in Materials at the Ruhr-Universität Bo- der Fakultät für Maschinenbau für Werk- chum. -
North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) / India
Page 1 of 13 Consulate General of India Frankfurt *** General and Bilateral Brief- North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW) / India North Rhine-Westphalia, commonly shortened to NRW is the most populous state of Germany, with a population of approximately 18 million, and the fourth largest by area. It was formed in 1946 as a merger of the provinces of North Rhine and Westphalia, both formerly parts of Prussia, and the Free State of Lippe. Its capital is Düsseldorf; the largest city is Cologne. Four of Germany's ten largest cities—Cologne, Düsseldorf, Dortmund, and Essen— are located within the state, as well as the second largest metropolitan area on the European continent, Rhine-Ruhr. NRW is a very diverse state, with vibrant business centers, bustling cities and peaceful natural landscapes. The state is home to one of the strongest industrial regions in the world and offers one of the most vibrant cultural landscapes in Europe. Salient Features 1. Geography: The state covers an area of 34,083 km2 and shares borders with Belgium in the southwest and the Netherlands in the west and northwest. It has borders with the German states of Lower Saxony to the north and northeast, Rhineland-Palatinate to the south and Hesse to the southeast. Thinking of North Rhine-Westphalia also means thinking of the big rivers, of the grassland, the forests, the lakes that stretch between the Eifel hills and the Teutoburg Forest range. The most important rivers flowing at least partially through North Rhine-Westphalia include: the Rhine, the Ruhr, the Ems, the Lippe, and the Weser. -
Bulletin Newsletter from the EABH
bulletin Newsletter from the EABH 1/2011 European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. Editorial Dear Colleagues, Our world inds itself confronted with the consequences of recent catastrophic events in Japan and the subsequent butterly effects. People’s revolutions have taken place in Tunisia and Egypt, signiicantly sup- ported, above all things, by the social network platform facebook. This revolutionary spark spread over most Arabic countries and lead to the abolishment of tyrannies in some places, but to leaders ighting their own people in others. The Euro inds itself struggling with the discrepancy between the European inancial and political uniication process, but remains one of the world’s most stable currencies. In this very instant, where recent inancial disasters lead to worldwide doubts about a inancial system undermined by a concept of mathematics and predictabilities, the rationality that underlies modern social sciences has obviously failed as ideology. I cannot help but relect on a remark by Nassim Nicholas Taleb in his book “Black Swans”: “Our inability to predict outliers that imply the inability to predict the course of history, given the share of these events in the dynamics of history”. Will 2011 change our perception and approach towards history? Should we go on believing in concepts of historical evidence? Is it actually possible to take advantage of former experi- ences if we cannot use probability as a tool to understand the present and predict the future? The only thing that is certain is – we do not know! In situations of uncertainty, the element of risk arises. And if we really can’t predict anything, our ability to evaluate, classify and ultimately reduce risk becomes more important.