DOCSLIB.ORG

A Comparison of the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area to Its Peers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Comparison of the Milwaukee Metropolitan Area to Its Peers MEMORANDUM REPORT NO. 221 (2ND EDITION) A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION SOUTHEASTERN WISCONSIN REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION Kenosha County Milwaukee County Ozaukee County Steve Bostrom Donna Brown-Martin Thomas H. Buestrin Aloysius Nelson Theodore Lipscomb, Sr. Jennifer K. Rothstein Robert W. Pitts Vacant Gustav W. Wirth, Jr., Secretary Racine County Walworth County Washington County Waukesha County Mike Dawson Charles L. Colman, Chairman Jeffrey D. Schleif Michael A. Crowley, Vice-Chairman James A. Ladwig Nancy Russell, Treasurer Daniel S. Schmidt José M. Delgado Peggy L. Shumway Vacant David L. Stroik James T. Dwyer Regional Land Use Planning Advisory Committee Regional Transportation Planning Advisory Committee Julie A. Anderson, Director, Racine County Public Works and Donna Brown-Martin Director, Milwaukee County Department Chair Development Services Chair of Transportation Robert Bauman Alderman, City of Milwaukee Fred Abadi, Ph. D., P.E. Director of Public Works, City of Waukesha Donna Brown-Martin Director, Milwaukee County Department Clement Abongwa, P.E. Director, Kenosha County Highways of Transportation Samir Amin City Engineer, City of Milwaukee Andy M. Buehler Director of Planning and Development, Kenosha County Julie A. Anderson Director, Racine County Public Works and Development Services Matthew A. Carran Director of Community Development, Village of Menomonee Falls Mitch Batuzich Transportation Planner, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Michael P. Cotter Director, Walworth County Land Use and Transportation Resource Management Department Shelly Billingsley Director of Public Works/City Engineer, Henry Elling Village Planner, Village of Summit City of Kenosha Paulette Enders Director of Development, City of Wauwatosa Daniel Boehm President and Managing Director, Milwaukee County Transit System Daniel F. Ertl, AICP Director Community Development, City of Brookfield Scott Brandmeier Director of Public Works/Village Engineer, Village of Fox Point Jason Fruth Planning and Zoning Manager, Waukesha County Allison Bussler Director of Public Works, Waukesha County Bob Harris Director of Planning and Development, Peter Daniels, P.E. City Engineer, City of West Allis City of Port Washington Jon E. Edgren, P.E. Director of Public Works/Highway Commissioner, Aaron Hertzberg Director of Economic Development, Ozaukee County Milwaukee County Julie Esch Deputy Director, Milwaukee County Department Kristi Johnson Community Development Manager, of Transportation City of Greenfield Doug Ferguson Senior Analyst, Chicago Metropolitan Vanessa L. Koster Planning Manager, City of Milwaukee Agency for Planning Jeffrey B. Labahn, AICP Director, Department of Community Carolynn Gellings, P.E. Engineering Services Manager, Development and Inspections, City of Kenosha Waukesha County Department of Public Works Joseph Liebau, Jr. Secretary’s Director – Southeast Region, Gail Good Director, Air Management Program, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Maria Pandazi City Planner, City of Waukesha Thomas M. Grisa, P.E. Director of Public Works, City of Brookfield Mark Piotrowicz Director, Department of Community Richard Hough Director of Public Works and Highway Development, City of West Bend Commissioner, Walworth County Public Works Department Brandi Richter District Conservationist, U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service Nik Kovac Alderman, City of Milwaukee Matthew Sadowski, AICP Planning and Redevelopment Manager, Joseph Liebau, Jr. Secretary’s Director – Southeast Region, City of Racine Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Karen L. Sands Director of Planning, Research and Sustainability, Max Maréchal City Engineer, City of West Bend Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District Kimberly Montgomery Director of Intergovernmental Relations, Steven J. Schaer, AICP Manager of Planning and Zoning, City of Milwaukee City of West Allis Jeffrey S. Polenske, P.E. Commissioner of Public Works, Douglas Seymour Director of Community Development, City of Milwaukee City of Oak Creek Ron J. Pritzlaff, P.E. Assistant Village Engineer, Debora M. Sielski Deputy Planning and Parks Administrator, Village of Mount Pleasant Manager of Planning Division, Washington County Planning and Parks Department John Rooney, P.E. Commissioner of Public Works/City Engineer, City of Racine Andrew T. Struck Director, Planning and Parks Department, Ozaukee County Scott M. Schmidt P.E., P.L.S. Highway Commissioner and County Surveyor, Washington County Highway Department Todd M. Stuebe, P.E., AICP Director of Community Development, City of Glendale David Simpson Director of Public Works, City of Wauwatosa Kurt Thiede Regional Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Brian M. Udovich, P.E. Highway Operations Manager, Jefferson County Highway Department Charles Wade Director of Planning and Economic Development, Wisconsin Department of Transportation John F. Weishan, Jr. 16th District Supervisor, Milwaukee County William Wheeler Community Planner, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation Dennis Yaccarino Senior Budget and Policy Manager, City of Milwaukee MEMORANDUM REPORT NUMBER 221 (2ND EDITION) A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS Prepared by the Southeastern Wisconsin Regional Planning Commission W239 N1812 Rockwood Drive P.O. Box 1607 Waukesha, Wisconsin 53187-1607 www.sewrpc.org The preparation of this publication was financed in part through planning funds provided by the Federal Highway and Federal Transit Administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation and the Wisconsin Departments of Transportation, Natural Resources, and Administration. The contents of this report do not necessarily reflect the official views or policy of these agencies. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration March 2020 A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report provides a statistical comparison of the Milwaukee metropolitan area with 14 other metro areas in the midwest and 14 other metro areas throughout the nation (see Map 1). The purpose was to assess how the Milwaukee area compares with other areas on a number of key measures, including population growth and characteristics, the economy, and transportation. The comparison includes data on existing conditions as well as changes primarily between 2010 and 2018. Major findings of the comparison are noted below. These findings provide valuable information for consideration in developing long-range plans for Southeastern Wisconsin. This report is the second edition of the comparison of the Milwaukee metro area to its peers. The first edition presented data from 2000 to 2013. Notable changes identified as part of the updated analysis include the Milwaukee area improving compared to other metro areas with respect to per capita income, percent and ranking of people in poverty, and ranking in unemployment rate. Comparisons where Milwaukee now rates less competitively than other metro areas include travel time delays and congestion costs. Despite these changes, the three primary conclusions discussed in the remainder of this summary are unchanged from the previous edition of this report. • A Slow-growth Area – The Milwaukee metro area has had slower population growth than most metro areas. Of the 28 peers in this report, 17 grew by 6 percent or more from 2010 to 2018, compared to just over 1 percent growth for the Milwaukee area. In terms of job growth, only the Buffalo, Cleveland, and Pittsburgh metro areas had slower job growth than the 9 percent increase in jobs in the Milwaukee area from 2010 to 2018. Manufacturing employment in the Milwaukee area has also continued its long-term decline, although it continues to account for 12 percent of total employment, ranking Milwaukee second in the midwest metro areas, and first among other metro areas. Even though the Milwaukee area has experienced slower population and job growth, housing values and home selling prices in the Milwaukee area are among the highest in the midwest and rank near the middle of metro areas outside the midwest. • Strong Evidence of Disparities – Within the Milwaukee metro area’s population, there are significant disparities between whites and minorities—far more pronounced than the disparities in almost all other metro areas. Whites on average have significantly higher educational attainment levels and per capita income levels, and a far lower poverty rate. Similar disparities also exist between whites and minorities within the City of Milwaukee itself. A COMPARISON OF THE MILWAUKEE METROPOLITAN AREA TO ITS PEERS | iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY There are also significant disparities for education, per capita income, and poverty between City of Milwaukee residents and residents of the rest of the Milwaukee metro area. These geographical disparities in the Milwaukee area exceed the disparities between principal cities and their suburbs in almost all other metro areas. • An Unbalanced Transportation System – Several indicators show that the highway system in the Milwaukee metro area performs well in comparison to other metropolitan areas. Travel time delay and congestion costs for auto commuters in the Milwaukee area are below the averages for both the midwest and the other metropolitan areas. The increase in travel time delay for auto commuters in the Milwaukee area over
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market As of October 1, 2004
    COMPREHENSIVE MARKET ANALYSIS REPORTS Policy Development & Research Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market As of October 1, 2004 ECONOMIC RESEARCH U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market as of October 1, 2004 Foreword This analysis has been prepared for the assistance and guidance of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in its operations. The factual information, findings, and conclusions may be useful also to builders, mortgagees, and others concerned with local housing conditions and trends. The analysis does not purport to make determinations regarding the acceptability of any mortgage insurance proposal that may be under consideration. The factual framework for this analysis follows the guidelines developed by HUD’s Economic and Market Analysis Division. The analysis and findings are as thorough and current as possible based on information available on the “as-of” date from both local and national sources. As such, any findings or conclusions may be modified by subsequent developments. HUD wishes to express its appreciation to those industry sources and state and local government officials who provided data and information on local economic and housing market conditions. This analysis takes into consideration changes in the economic, demographic, and housing inventory characteristics of the market area during three periods: from 1990 to 2000, from 2000 to the October 1, 2004 as-of date of the analysis (Current date), and from the Current date to an October 1, 2007 Forecast date. The analysis presents counts and estimates of employment, population, households, and housing inventory, as of the 1990 Census, 2000 Census, Current date, and Forecast date.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter from Jeff Broadhurst & Trina Demarco
    Letter from Jeff Broadhurst & Trina DeMarco Celebrate ~ Care ~ Create! Those three words summarize Eat’n Park Hospitality Group’s approach to partnering with our neighbors to create even stronger communities. Since our humble beginnings as a carhop restaurant in 1949, our commitment to our team members, their families, our guests, and our communities has grown, just as our company has grown. Our goal as a provider of hospitality services is to create memorable experiences built on relationships. We carry that goal outside our walls to celebrate the accomplishments of our team members and our neighbors; to care for people who have encountered challenges; and to create an environment where people enjoy each other’s company and an always-needed smile s. As you look over the pages that follow, you’ll see examples of how we Celebrate ~ Care ~ Create! From collaborations to fund-raising, from community visits to volunteerism and more, we embrace our responsibility to our friends and neighbors. Your involvement in our community support initiatives is essential and very much appreciated. Whether you contribute, volunteer or inspire, your support enhances our community in meaningful ways. We are grateful for you and all that you do. Jeff Broadhurst Trina DeMarco President & CEO Director of Corporate Giving and Eat’n Park Hospitality Group Community Partnerships Eat’n Park Hospitality Group 3 LifeSmiles®: benefit programs that ensure that children have access to the nutritious food Creating Healthier Communities they need to grow and thrive. Healthier Communities through Partnerships: Eat’n Park Hospitality Group believes that great partnerships can inspire positive community change.
    [Show full text]
  • GAO-04-758 Metropolitan Statistical Areas
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Subcommittee on GAO Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives June 2004 METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS New Standards and Their Impact on Selected Federal Programs a GAO-04-758 June 2004 METROPOLITAN STATISTICAL AREAS New Standards and Their Impact on Highlights of GAO-04-758, a report to the Selected Federal Programs Subcommittee on Technology, Information Policy, Intergovernmental Relations and the Census, Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives For the past 50 years, the federal The new standards for federal statistical recognition of metropolitan areas government has had a metropolitan issued by OMB in 2000 differ from the 1990 standards in many ways. One of the area program designed to provide a most notable differences is the introduction of a new designation for less nationally consistent set of populated areas—micropolitan statistical areas. These are areas comprised of a standards for collecting, tabulating, central county or counties with at least one urban cluster of at least 10,000 but and publishing federal statistics for geographic areas in the United fewer than 50,000 people, plus adjacent outlying counties if commuting criteria States and Puerto Rico. Before is met. each decennial census, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) The 2000 standards and the latest population update have resulted in five reviews the standards to ensure counties being dropped from metropolitan statistical areas, while another their continued usefulness and 41counties that had been a part of a metropolitan statistical area have had their relevance and, if warranted, revises statistical status changed and are now components of micropolitan statistical them.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee-Waukesha Area, Wisconsin
    Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee-Waukesha Area, Wisconsin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1229 Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee -Waukesha Area, Wisconsin By F. C. FOLEY, W. C. WALTON, and W. J. DRESCHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1229 A progress report, with emphasis on the artesian sandstone aquifer. Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1953 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director f For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 70 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 3 Purpose and scope of report.................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................... 5 Description of the area............................................................................................ 6 Previous reports........................................................................................................ 6 Well-numbering system.............................................................................................. 7 Stratigraphy.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geography Variables
    The 2016 National Survey of Children’s Health reports four geographic variables on the public use file: FIPSST (State of Residence), CBSAFP_YN (Core-Based Statistical Area Status), METRO_YN (Metropolitan Statistical Area Status), and MPC_YN (Metropolitan Principal City Status). The intersection of CBSAFP_YN and METRO_YN allows users to also identify children in Micropolitan Statistical Areas. Core-Based Statistical Areas (CBSAs) are defined as a county or counties with at least one urbanized area or urban cluster (a core) of at least 10,000 population, plus adjacent counties that have a high degree of social and economic integration with the core (as measured through commuting ties). There are two types of CBSAs: Metropolitan Statistical Areas (MSAs) and Micropolitan Statistical Areas (μSAs). The differentiating factor between these types is that MSAs have a larger core, with a population of at least 50,000. A principal city – the largest incorporated place with a population of at least 50,000 – is identified in every MSA. The intersection of FIPSST, CBSAFP_YN, METRO_YN, and MPC_YN allows a user to identify four geographic areas: - Not in a Core-Based Statistical Area (CBSAFP_YN = 2) - Micropolitan Statistical Area (CBSAFP_YN = 1 and METRO_YN = 2) - Metropolitan Statistical Area, not Principal City (METRO_YN = 1 and MPC_YN = 2) - Metropolitan Principal City (MPC_YN = 1) To protect respondent confidentiality, CBSAFP_YN, METRO_YN, and MPC_YN could not be reported for children in some states. If a variable or intersection of variables could be used to identify a geographic area within a state with a child population under 100,000, reported values for that variable were replaced with ".D", indicating "Suppressed for Confidentiality", for all children in that state.
    [Show full text]
  • Volunteer Opportunities
    Volunteer Opportunities ADVOCACY Cleveland Rape Crisis Center: Supports survivors of sexual violence, promotes healing and prevention and creates social change. http://www.clevelandrapecrisis.org/support-crcc/volunteer Domestic Violence and Child Advocacy Center: Empowers individuals, educates the community and advocates for justice to end domestic violence and child abuse. http://www.dvcac.org/volunteer The LGBT Community Center of Greater Cleveland: Pursues change to advance the respect, dignity and human rights of the LGBT community. http://www.lgbtcleveland.org/volunteer.html ANIMALS Berea Animal Rescue Fund: Shelters and finds homes for stray animals. http://bereaanimalrescue.com Cleveland Animal Protective League: https://clevelandapl.org/volunteer/current-opportunities/ Northeast Ohio SPCA: A Non-Profit No-Kill Pet Shelter that will adopt approximately 2,500 pets into loving homes annually. http://www.northeastohiospca.org/ Parma Animal Shelter: http://parmashelter.org/volunteer/ ARTS The Cleveland Museum of Art: http://www.clevelandart.org/join-and-give/get-involved The Cleveland Orchestra: http://www.clevelandorchestra.com/support-and-volunteers/volunteering CHILDREN Achievement Centers for Children: Provides programs for children with physical, emotional, or neurological disabilities. http://www.achievementcenters.org/ Big Brothers Big Sisters of Greater Cleveland: A youth mentoring organization. https://www.bbbs.org/get-involved/ Center for Families and Children: Bridges the opportunity gap by connecting as many people as possible to effective health care, education and essential human services. http://www.thecentersohio.org/ The Glori Foundation: Mentors, tutors and provide scholarships to youth. http://www.theglorifoundation.com/ Girls on the Run: Inspire girls to be healthy and confident through running. https://gotrnortheastohio.org/Volunteer Guidestone Ohio (formerly Berea Children’s Home): Provides an integrated system of effective behavioral health and support services for children, family and adults.
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago • Cincinnati • Cleveland • Columbus • Detroit • Indianapolis Kansas City • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Omaha • St
    Midwest Region Chicago • Cincinnati • Cleveland • Columbus • Detroit • Indianapolis Kansas City • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Omaha • St. Louis • Toledo MidwestRegionTransactionBreakdown n CCIM Institute designees and candidates rated the eco- dition, the weighted average capitalization rates for each nomic performance in the Midwest region at 5.6 on a scale property sector in the Midwest region, with the exception of 1 to 10, with 10 being high, for first quarter 2008. This of the retail sector, were higher than the national averag- was the lowest rating of the four regions, but was higher es. than the rating given to the nation as a whole. n In contrast to trends where slow consumer spending is n The size- and price-weighted average prices per square negatively affecting retail property fundamentals, retail foot or unit of space in the Midwest regional commercial space showed the most improvement among the major real estate market were well below those same averages property sectors in the Midwest region during first quarter for the nation during first quarter 2008, except for several 2008. of the higher-volume averages in the retail sector. In ad- Regional Transaction Price Breakdown/Tiers Midwest Transaction Breakdown (4/1/07 - 3/31/08) “Small industrial prop- erties on the edge of Office Industrial Retail Apartment Hotel residential development < $2 Million offer good investment Volume (Mil) $386 $757 $786 $361 $43 opportunities.” Size Weighted Avg. ($ per sf/unit) $75 $39 $76 $34,951 $20,612 -Chicago Price Weighted Avg. ($ per sf/unit) $99 $56 $116 $44,074 $23,973 Median ($ per sf/unit) $75 $42 $74 $36,100 $21,734 $2 - $5 Million Volume (Mil) $643 $1,238 $1,288 $554 $309 “It looks like apart- Size Weighted Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Mi0747data.Pdf
    DETROIT'S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Milwaukee Junction HAER MI-416 Detroit Michigan WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Location: Milwaukee Junction, Detroit, Michigan The survey boundaries are Woodward Avenue on the west and St. Aubin on the east. The southern boundary is marked by the Grand Trunk Western railroad line, which runs just south of East Baltimore from Woodward past St. Aubin. The northern boundary of the survey starts on the west end at East Grand Boulevard, runs east along the boulevard to Russell, moves north along Russell to Euclid, and extends east along Euclid to St. Aubin. Significance: The area known as Milwaukee Junction, located just north of Detroit’s city center, was a center of commercial and industrial activity for more than a century. Milwaukee Junction served, if not as the birthplace of American automobile manufacturing, then as its nursery. In addition to the Ford Motor Company and General Motors, many early auto manufacturers and their support services (especially body manufacturers like the Fisher Brothers, C.R. Wilson, and Trippensee Auto Body) were also located in the area, probably because of the proximity of the railroads. Historians: Kenneth Shepherd and Richard Sucré, 2003 Project Information: The Historic American Engineering Record conducted a survey of Detroit’s Milwaukee Junction, a center of auto and related industrial production, in summer 2003. The City of Detroit and the city’s Historic Designation Advisory Board sponsored the survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Milwaukee Region Food Industry Brochure
    CHOOSE MILWAUKEE MILWAUKEE REGION SOUTHEAST WISCONSin’S FOOD INDUSTRY Locally grown. Regionally made. Consumed around the world. # The Milwaukee1 Region has the highest concentration of workers in the food industry CHOOSEMILWAUKEE.COM MILWAUKEE CHOOSE HISTORY, EXPERTISE AND CENTRAL LOCATION The Milwaukee Region of Southeast Wisconsin has been a center of commerce since it was settled more than 150 years ago. The Region evolved from a frontier outpost to become the “Beer Capital of the World” and later the “Machine Shop to the World.” Manufacturing defines our history and our future. It is ingrained in our character and remains our most vibrant economic sector. Retaining our traditions of producing the finest dairy, cheeses, sausages and brews, our food industry has great depth and breadth beyond these niches. We are at the forefront of urban agriculture, food ingredients manufacturing, industrial innovation and water technologies. REGIONAL SNAPSHOT • 2 million residents • 1 million jobs • 160,000 manufacturing workers (2nd highest concentration among large U.S. metropolitan areas) • 52,000 businesses with strong clusters including food manufacturing, power, automation and controls, and water technologies. FOOD AND BEVERAGE MANufacTURING 243 Food 14,170 eMployeeS $582 Million 9.7% oF oUR ManUFaCTUReRS (highest concentration in payRoll ManUFaCTURing of talent among large baSe U.S. metropolitan areas) 00 mile radius 5 CLOSE TO CHICAGO, CENTRAL TO MIDWEST Canada Milwaukee is located 80 miles (130 km) north The annual food expenditures of Chicago, the third largest city in the U.S. in the Chicago-Milwaukee- Together, Milwaukee and Chicago form Minneapolis Toronto Minneapolis corridor total a global mega-region that includes more than 30 Fortune 500 companies and Milwaukee 100+ colleges and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Metropolitan Statistical Areas
    Monday, June 28, 2010 Part IV Office of Management and Budget 2010 Standards for Delineating Metropolitan and Micropolitan Statistical Areas; Notice VerDate Mar<15>2010 20:27 Jun 25, 2010 Jkt 220001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\28JNN3.SGM 28JNN3 srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES3 37246 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 123 / Monday, June 28, 2010 / Notices OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND Web site at http://www.whitehouse.gov/ nonstatistical activities or for use in BUDGET omb/fedreg_default/. program funding formulas. Furthermore, the Metropolitan and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 2010 Standards for Delineating Micropolitan Statistical Area Standards Suzann Evinger, Office of Management Metropolitan and Micropolitan do not produce an urban-rural and Budget, telephone number (202) Statistical Areas classification, and confusion of these 395–3093, fax number 202–395–7245. concepts can lead to difficulties in AGENCY: Office of Information and SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: program implementation. Counties Regulatory Affairs, Office of Outline of Notice included in Metropolitan and Management and Budget (OMB), Micropolitan Statistical Areas and many Executive Office of the President. A. Background and Review Process other counties may contain both urban ACTION: Notice of decision. B. Summary of Comments Received in and rural territory and population. For Response to the February 12, 2009 Federal instance, programs that seek to SUMMARY: This Notice announces OMB’s Register Notice adoption of 2010 Standards for C. OMB’s Decisions
    [Show full text]
  • WUWM's 2019 EEO Report
    WUWM MILWAUKEE PUBLIC RADIO UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN – MILWAUKEE ANNUAL EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT 2019 August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2019 The purpose of this EEO Public File Report is to comply with Section 73.2080(c ) (6) of the FCC’s 2002 rule on equal employment opportunities. This report has been prepared on behalf of the station and is on file, as required, in the station’s public file and on its website. The FCC’s EEO Rules require that this Report contain the following information: 1. A list of all full-time vacancies filled by the Station(s) comprising the Station Employment Unit during the Applicable Period; 2. For each such vacancy, the recruitment source(s) utilized to fill the vacancy (including, if applicable, organizations entitled to notification pursuant to Section 73.2080(c)(1)(ii) of the EEO Rules, which should be identified by name, address, contact person and telephone number; 3. The recruitment source that referred the hire for each full-time vacancy during the Applicable Period; 4. Data reflecting the total number of persons interviewed for full-time vacancies during the Applicable Period and the total number of interviewees referred by each recruitment source utilized in connection with such vacancies; and 5. A list and brief description of the initiatives undertaken pursuant to Section 73.2080(c)(2) of the FCC rules. EEO Contact Information For Unit: Ann Piatt WUWM-FM 111 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 Section 1 – Vacancy Information Vacancy Job Recruit Source of Number of Number from Each Recruitment Source
    [Show full text]
  • MV4062 Milwaukee Brewers Information and Application
    WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION page 1 of 2 Milwaukee Brewers License Plates Information and Application MV4062 8/2020 s.341.14(6r)(b)13 Wis. Stats ► WisDOT may refuse to issue or may recall after issuance a request that is misleading or may be offensive to good taste or decency. ► No refund or adjustment will be made for a change of choice or spacing after the plate has been ordered or if the application is unclear or incorrectly completed. ► Plates will be mailed 3– 4 weeks after you receive the new Certificate of Registration. Ball and Glove logo plate How to apply 1. To order non-personalized Milwaukee Brewers plates, mark first option and go to step 6. 2. To order personalized Milwaukee Brewers plates, mark second option and choose 1–6 characters. 3. Use capital letters or numbers. The letter O and the number zero are the same. The following are not acceptable: small letters, symbols, signs, hyphens, apostrophes, etc. Carefully distinguish between: letters L or I and number 1, letter S and number 5, letter G and number 6, letter Z and number 2, letter B and number 8, letters U and letter V. Brewers “M” logo plate If you choose 6 characters, no spaces are allowed. When you purchase Milwaukee Brewers license plates, your fee includes an annual $25 tax-deductible donation. This G O T E A M donation, less a 2% licensing fee to Major League Baseball, If you choose 5 or fewer characters, you may request up is used by the Southeast Wisconsin Professional Baseball to two spaces between any of the characters.
    [Show full text]