Mi0747data.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Mi0747data.Pdf DETROIT'S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Milwaukee Junction HAER MI-416 Detroit Michigan WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Location: Milwaukee Junction, Detroit, Michigan The survey boundaries are Woodward Avenue on the west and St. Aubin on the east. The southern boundary is marked by the Grand Trunk Western railroad line, which runs just south of East Baltimore from Woodward past St. Aubin. The northern boundary of the survey starts on the west end at East Grand Boulevard, runs east along the boulevard to Russell, moves north along Russell to Euclid, and extends east along Euclid to St. Aubin. Significance: The area known as Milwaukee Junction, located just north of Detroit’s city center, was a center of commercial and industrial activity for more than a century. Milwaukee Junction served, if not as the birthplace of American automobile manufacturing, then as its nursery. In addition to the Ford Motor Company and General Motors, many early auto manufacturers and their support services (especially body manufacturers like the Fisher Brothers, C.R. Wilson, and Trippensee Auto Body) were also located in the area, probably because of the proximity of the railroads. Historians: Kenneth Shepherd and Richard Sucré, 2003 Project Information: The Historic American Engineering Record conducted a survey of Detroit’s Milwaukee Junction, a center of auto and related industrial production, in summer 2003. The City of Detroit and the city’s Historic Designation Advisory Board sponsored the survey. Richard O’Connor, HAER, served as project leader. The field team included historians Kenneth Shepherd and Richard Sucré. Justine Christianson, HAER Historian, edited the report. Jet Lowe, HAER Photographer, produced large-format photographs of select sites. These include: HAER MI-333, 1900 East Milwaukee (Industrial Building) HAER MI-334, Ivan Doverspike Company HAER MI-336, The Fairmount Creamery Corporation HAER MI-337, Pioneer Building HAER MI-340, American Can Company HAER MI-343, Russell Industrial Center HAER MI-345, Murray Body Company Complex HAER MI-351, New Center Stamping HAER MI-352, National Can Company HAER MI-353, Ford Service Building HABS MI-443, Engine Company Nos. 11 & 28 Firehouse DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 (Page 2) Chronology: 1837 Milwaukee Junction begins to be defined by the Pontiac Railroad (later the Detroit & Milwaukee), which runs from the waterfront to Pontiac along Dequindre. 1899 Construction of F. A. Thompson Manufacturing Company (1962 Trombly), the oldest surviving building within the survey boundaries. 1908 The three Trippensee brothers build a plant at 2679 East Grand Boulevard to produce their famous planetariums. Their wood and metalworking skills lead them to expand into auto body manufacture, and the factory is enlarged for this purpose in 1915. 1909 Detroit Wire Spring Company builds a factory at 1900 Marston. This plant was later absorbed into the Murray Body Corporation as its fender division. Albert Kahn designs and builds the Boulevard Building (7310 Woodward) for the Ford Motor Company as its service headquarters. The building is enlarged in 1913. 1911 The building housing the Anderson Electric Car Company (now Russell Industrial Center, Building 2 at 1610 Clay) is erected. An Art Stove Company storeroom opens at 6500 Russell. 1916 National Can Company (later the George C. Wetherbee Company) constructs a factory at what is now 2566 East Grand Boulevard. American Can Company also opens its doors at 1400 Trombly. 1918 Richard Brothers Die Works (later Allied Products Corporation) builds their plant at 1560 Milwaukee. 1919 Construction of C.R. Wilson Body Company Building 5 (1666 Clay), now part of the Russell Industrial Center, notable for its unique curved façade facing the railroad. 1920 Construction of C.R. Wilson Body Company Buildings 1 (1600 Clay), 1A (1604 Clay), and 4 (1630 Clay), all now part of the Russell Industrial Center. The Detroit Machine & Tool Company opens its doors at 6545 St. Antoine. 1922 Construction of C.R. Wilson Body Company Buildings 4A (1640 Clay) and 4B (1650 Clay), both now part of the Russell Industrial Center. Construction of Fisher Body Stamping Plant (Plant #37), 950 Milwaukee, now New Center Stamping. 1923 Construction begins on a new building for the Murray Body Corporation—Body Division, designed by Albert Kahn (now Russell Industrial Center, Building 3, DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 (Page 3) 1614 Clay). An addition to the structure is completed in 1929. Richard Brothers Die Works also opens a new factory on Lyman Place in this year. 1925 The National Drill Twist Company constructs its factory at 1925 Clay. J.W. Murray Manufacturing buys the C.D. Widman Company, manufacturers of auto bodies, mirrors, and glass products. 1926 The building housing the McCord Manufacturing Supply Company and Springman Paper Supply Company opens at 1579 East Milwaukee. 1928 The Detroit Fire Company, Engine Company No. 28 and Ladder Company No. 11 opens at 1475 East Milwaukee. 1929 The Boyer-Campbell Company opens its new machine tools factory at 6540 St. Antoine. The Fairmount Creamery moves into its building at 608 East Milwaukee. 1947 Frank Brothers Iron Works (later the Peschke Packing Company) builds their plant at 2600 East Grand Boulevard. Introduction Milwaukee Junction received its name from the meeting of two of Michigan’s earliest railways. The oldest of these was the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee line, which was a lineal descendent of the Detroit & Pontiac Railroad, originally incorporated in 1834. By 1855, the line was running trains between the two southeastern Michigan cities. The line was reorganized as the Detroit, Grand Haven & Milwaukee in 1878 and merged with the Canadian Grand Trunk Western line in 1928. The second of the two lines that met in Detroit at Milwaukee Junction was the old Michigan Central line. First chartered by the Michigan legislature in 1846, the line acquired the charter of the Central line, one of the first three parallel lines to cross the state from east to west.1 New York Central leased Michigan Central beginning in 1930 for an extended period, but in 1961, the line’s assets began to be divided among different companies. In 1978, Penn Central received much of what remained of Michigan Central, but when that line went bankrupt, some of its assets went to Consolidated Rail, or ConRail.2 1 The early railroads appear on at least four maps of Detroit published between 1837 and 1889, the date when the area begins to be covered by Sanborn insurance maps. See “City of Detroit, Michigan, from late and accurate Surveys, May 1837,” in Brian Leigh Dunnigan, Frontier Metropolis: Picturing Early Detroit, 1701-1838 (Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2001), 202; Sylvester Wesley Higgins, “Map of Wayne County” (Cincinnati: Doolittle & Munson, [1840]); S. Augustus Mitchell, “Plan of the City of Detroit, 1882”; Atlas of the City of Detroit, Michigan (New York: E. Robinson, 1885); and Sanborn Insurance Company, Insurance Maps of Detroit, Michigan (New York: Sanborn Insurance Company, 1889-2001). Of the railroads appearing on these maps, the Dequindre line of the Grand Trunk (the old Pontiac Railroad) appears on all five maps or collections. The old Michigan Central Line, approaching Milwaukee Junction from the west, appears only on Mitchell’s map, the Robinson atlas, and on Sanborn maps, from which it can be concluded that Milwaukee Junction came into existence between 1840 and 1882. 2 Graydon M. Meints, Michigan Railroads and Railroad Companies (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1992), 170-71, 176-77, 182-83. For the purposes of this report, Michigan Central refers to the lines originally owned DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 (Page 4) Background The presence of the railroads did not immediately make Milwaukee Junction an auto manufacturer’s paradise. Early major industries in the area were related either to the railroad itself (the Peninsula Car Company, located just south of the survey area, built cars for the railroad beginning in the late nineteenth century) or the food industry. The latter included such local specialty shops as the Michigan Celery Beverage Company, the Peschke Sausage Company, and several dairy and milk-processing plants, including the Clover Milk Company and its successor, the J. Schlaff Creamery Company (both at 105 East Baltimore), the State Creamery Company (at the corner of East Grand and DuBois), and the Fairmount Creamery. Most of the buildings that housed these companies have been destroyed, but the Fairmount Creamery remains as a reminder of this era in Detroit’s history. The industry that benefitted the nascent auto manufacturers the most was the carriage building trade. Early carriage builders included the Anderson Carriage Company, the C.R. and J.C. Wilson Carriage Company, and the Johnson Carriage Company, which was in business at 101 East Baltimore before 1905 and remained in business until nearly 1920.3 The skilled wood and metal workers in the carriage trade quickly applied their talents to making automobile bodies. This led to the development of new businesses specializing in the production of bodies for automobiles, such as the Fisher Brothers, Trippensee Closed Body Company, the C.R. Wilson Body Company, and the Murray Body Corporation of America. These companies supplied bodies to both major and minor companies, including Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Chrysler, Hupp, Reo, and DeSoto. Before the arrival of the automotive industry, Milwaukee Junction was largely residential, and residences and small businesses still make up a significant proportion of the area.4 Residents were not all transient auto workers who moved on to other jobs within a few years.
Recommended publications
  • Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market As of October 1, 2004
    COMPREHENSIVE MARKET ANALYSIS REPORTS Policy Development & Research Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market As of October 1, 2004 ECONOMIC RESEARCH U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Analysis of the Milwaukee-Waukesha, Wisconsin Housing Market as of October 1, 2004 Foreword This analysis has been prepared for the assistance and guidance of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in its operations. The factual information, findings, and conclusions may be useful also to builders, mortgagees, and others concerned with local housing conditions and trends. The analysis does not purport to make determinations regarding the acceptability of any mortgage insurance proposal that may be under consideration. The factual framework for this analysis follows the guidelines developed by HUD’s Economic and Market Analysis Division. The analysis and findings are as thorough and current as possible based on information available on the “as-of” date from both local and national sources. As such, any findings or conclusions may be modified by subsequent developments. HUD wishes to express its appreciation to those industry sources and state and local government officials who provided data and information on local economic and housing market conditions. This analysis takes into consideration changes in the economic, demographic, and housing inventory characteristics of the market area during three periods: from 1990 to 2000, from 2000 to the October 1, 2004 as-of date of the analysis (Current date), and from the Current date to an October 1, 2007 Forecast date. The analysis presents counts and estimates of employment, population, households, and housing inventory, as of the 1990 Census, 2000 Census, Current date, and Forecast date.
    [Show full text]
  • Detroit Neighborhoods
    St Clair Shores Oak Park Ferndale Hazel Park Warren Southfield Eastpointe 43 68 85 8 29 42 93 Harper Woods 83 34 7 90 78 16 44 19 54 97 4 95 105 76 77 56 94 86 60 72 33 26 6 45 81 67 84 69 88 58 Hamtramck 17 74 Redford Twp 12 103 39 30 40 1 89 41 71 15 9 20 100 66 80 96 70 82 5 51 36 57 2 38 49 27 59 99 23 35 32 73 62 61 50 46 3 37 53 104 52 28 102 13 31 79 98 21 64 55 11 87 18 22 25 65 63 101 47. Hubbard Farms 48 48. Hubbard Richard 77. Palmer Park 47 91 19. Conant Gardens 49. Indian Village 78. Palmer Woods Dearborn 20. Conner Creek 50. Islandview 79. Parkland 92 21. Core City 51. Jefferson Chalmers 80. Petosky-Otsego 22. Corktown 52. Jeffries 81. Pilgrim Village 23. Cultural Center 53. Joseph Berry Subdivision 82. Poletown East 24 Inkster 24. Delray 54. Krainz Woods 83. Pulaski 25. Downtown 55. Lafayette Park 84. Ravendale 75 14 26. East English Village 56. LaSalle College Park 85. Regent Park Melvindale 27. East Village 57. LaSalle Gardens 86. Riverdale 28. Eastern Market 58. Littlefield 87. Rivertown Dearborn Heights River Rouge 1. Arden Park 29. Eight Mile-Wyoming 59. Marina District 88. Rosedale Park 10 2. Art Center 30. Eliza Howell 60. Martin Park 89. Russell Woods 3. Aviation Sub 31. Elmwood Park 61. McDougall-Hunt 90. Sherwood Forest 4. Bagley 32. Fiskhorn 62.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee-Waukesha Area, Wisconsin
    Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee-Waukesha Area, Wisconsin GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1229 Ground-Water Conditions in the Milwaukee -Waukesha Area, Wisconsin By F. C. FOLEY, W. C. WALTON, and W. J. DRESCHER GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1229 A progress report, with emphasis on the artesian sandstone aquifer. Prepared in cooperation with the University of Wisconsin. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1953 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Douglas McKay, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director f For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 70 cents CONTENTS Page Abstract.............................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction........................................................................................................................ 3 Purpose and scope of report.................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgments...................................................................................................... 5 Description of the area............................................................................................ 6 Previous reports........................................................................................................ 6 Well-numbering system.............................................................................................. 7 Stratigraphy.......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chicago • Cincinnati • Cleveland • Columbus • Detroit • Indianapolis Kansas City • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Omaha • St
    Midwest Region Chicago • Cincinnati • Cleveland • Columbus • Detroit • Indianapolis Kansas City • Milwaukee • Minneapolis • Omaha • St. Louis • Toledo MidwestRegionTransactionBreakdown n CCIM Institute designees and candidates rated the eco- dition, the weighted average capitalization rates for each nomic performance in the Midwest region at 5.6 on a scale property sector in the Midwest region, with the exception of 1 to 10, with 10 being high, for first quarter 2008. This of the retail sector, were higher than the national averag- was the lowest rating of the four regions, but was higher es. than the rating given to the nation as a whole. n In contrast to trends where slow consumer spending is n The size- and price-weighted average prices per square negatively affecting retail property fundamentals, retail foot or unit of space in the Midwest regional commercial space showed the most improvement among the major real estate market were well below those same averages property sectors in the Midwest region during first quarter for the nation during first quarter 2008, except for several 2008. of the higher-volume averages in the retail sector. In ad- Regional Transaction Price Breakdown/Tiers Midwest Transaction Breakdown (4/1/07 - 3/31/08) “Small industrial prop- erties on the edge of Office Industrial Retail Apartment Hotel residential development < $2 Million offer good investment Volume (Mil) $386 $757 $786 $361 $43 opportunities.” Size Weighted Avg. ($ per sf/unit) $75 $39 $76 $34,951 $20,612 -Chicago Price Weighted Avg. ($ per sf/unit) $99 $56 $116 $44,074 $23,973 Median ($ per sf/unit) $75 $42 $74 $36,100 $21,734 $2 - $5 Million Volume (Mil) $643 $1,238 $1,288 $554 $309 “It looks like apart- Size Weighted Avg.
    [Show full text]
  • Airport Transportation
    Airport Transportation This is a selection of services that provide transportation between Detroit Metropolitan Airport and Ann Arbor. The Office of New Student Programs provides this list as a convenience to students and parents, and does not endorse or promote any particular service. Please note: Rates are subject to change. Shuttle Services Accent Transportation Service provides A2 MetroRide provides taxi service for up to 4 private sedan service and airport pickup. 24 passengers and shuttle service for individuals. hour advance reservation is recommended to Airport pick-up is available. secure time and choice of vehicle. Phone: 734.709.1204 Phone: 800.346.9884 Price: Taxi rates are $50 one way; shuttle Web: www.atsride.com rates are $40 per person Price: $55 from airport, $45 to airport Hours: 4:30 am – 11 pm Hours: 24 Hour Service Argus Cab provides private taxi service for up Amazing Blue Taxi provides taxi service for up to 4 passengers. Reservations should be made to four passengers. Reservations are required 24 hours before travel if possible. for airport pickups and reserving in advance Phone: 734.741.9000 guarantees transportation to airport. Price: $50 to airport, $60 from airport Phone: 734.846.0007 Hours: 24 Hour Service Web: www.amazingbluetaxi.com Price: $50 to airport; $60 from airport Campus Cars provides private taxi service and Hours: 24 Hour Service airport shuttle, 24 hour notice preferred Phone: 734.444.5354 Ann Arbor Airport Shuttle Inc. provides door E-Mail: [email protected] to door shuttle service and vans for groups up Price: $39 one way to nine passengers.
    [Show full text]
  • Milwaukee Region Food Industry Brochure
    CHOOSE MILWAUKEE MILWAUKEE REGION SOUTHEAST WISCONSin’S FOOD INDUSTRY Locally grown. Regionally made. Consumed around the world. # The Milwaukee1 Region has the highest concentration of workers in the food industry CHOOSEMILWAUKEE.COM MILWAUKEE CHOOSE HISTORY, EXPERTISE AND CENTRAL LOCATION The Milwaukee Region of Southeast Wisconsin has been a center of commerce since it was settled more than 150 years ago. The Region evolved from a frontier outpost to become the “Beer Capital of the World” and later the “Machine Shop to the World.” Manufacturing defines our history and our future. It is ingrained in our character and remains our most vibrant economic sector. Retaining our traditions of producing the finest dairy, cheeses, sausages and brews, our food industry has great depth and breadth beyond these niches. We are at the forefront of urban agriculture, food ingredients manufacturing, industrial innovation and water technologies. REGIONAL SNAPSHOT • 2 million residents • 1 million jobs • 160,000 manufacturing workers (2nd highest concentration among large U.S. metropolitan areas) • 52,000 businesses with strong clusters including food manufacturing, power, automation and controls, and water technologies. FOOD AND BEVERAGE MANufacTURING 243 Food 14,170 eMployeeS $582 Million 9.7% oF oUR ManUFaCTUReRS (highest concentration in payRoll ManUFaCTURing of talent among large baSe U.S. metropolitan areas) 00 mile radius 5 CLOSE TO CHICAGO, CENTRAL TO MIDWEST Canada Milwaukee is located 80 miles (130 km) north The annual food expenditures of Chicago, the third largest city in the U.S. in the Chicago-Milwaukee- Together, Milwaukee and Chicago form Minneapolis Toronto Minneapolis corridor total a global mega-region that includes more than 30 Fortune 500 companies and Milwaukee 100+ colleges and universities.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper
    Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Research Paper Detroit: What Lessons for Victoria from a ‘Post-Industrial’ City? No. 2, December 2015 Tom Barnes Research Fellow, Parliamentary Library & Information Service Institute for Religion, Politics and Society Australian Catholic University Level 6, 215 Spring St, Melbourne VIC 3000 [email protected] ISSN 2204-4752 (Print) 2204-4760 (Online) © 2015 Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Parliament of Victoria Research Papers produced by the Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria are released under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence. By using this Creative Commons licence, you are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: . Attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-Commercial - You may not use this work for commercial purposes without our permission. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work without our permission. The Creative Commons licence only applies to publications produced by the Library, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria. All other material produced by the Parliament
    [Show full text]
  • HUD PD&R Housing Market Profiles: Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Michigan
    HUD PD&R Housing Market Profiles Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, Michigan Quick Facts About Detroit-Warren- Dearborn By Gabe Labovitz | As of February 1, 2018 Current sales market conditions: balanced. Current apartment market conditions: balanced. Overview The Detroit-Warren-Dearborn (hereafter, Detroit) metropolitan area The city of Detroit became the largest municipal is coterminous with the Detroit-Warren-Dearborn, MI Metropolitan bankruptcy in U.S. history, by debt and popula­ Statistical Area. It includes six counties in southeastern Michigan— tion affected, when it filed under Chapter 9 during Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Oakland, St. Clair, and Wayne 2013. After negotiations with creditors, the city Counties. Wayne County includes the city of Detroit. The first mile exited bankruptcy in December 2014 and has of paved concrete road in the nation was installed on Woodward since posted three consecutive balanced bud­ Avenue in Detroit in 1909, slightly north of the Ford Model T plant. gets. The General Motors Company (formerly Henry Ford produced his first automobile in Detroit in 1896, and the General Motors Corporation) and FCA US, currently three of the four largest employers in the metropolitan LLC (formerly Chrysler), two of the four largest area are Ford Motor Company, General Motors, and FCA US. As employers in the Detroit metropolitan area, each of September 2017, the metropolitan area had a concentration of filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and emerged jobs in the transportation equipment manufacturing industry more during 2009. than five times the national average, and jobs in this industry rose an average of 5.3 percent annually from a recent low of 74,950 jobs during 2010 to 102,300 jobs during 2016 (Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages).
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi 2 DTE Energy 6400 N. Dixie Hwy. Newport, MI 48166
    Visitor Guide Fermi 2 - DTE Energy Fermi 2 DTE Energy 6400 N. Dixie Hwy. Newport, MI 48166 1 Welcome Monroe County is just miles from the Michigan/Ohio border, Monroe, Michigan serves as the gateway to the Great Lakes. Monroe is located 45 minutes away from the larger metropolitan areas of Detroit, Ann Arbor and Toledo. Local residents and visitors share the advantages of small town charm together with easy access to the array of services and opportunities offered by large cities. This visitor guide will provide you with directions to our Fermi 2 site, as well as, places and stay and eat in the area. Brief History Construction of Fermi 2 began in 1968 when DTE Energy announced plans to build a light water reactor power plant along the Western shore of Lake Erie in Frenchtown Township. The plant was constructed to meet the fast growing, local demand for electricity and to provide the region with a diverse fuel mix. The plant opened in January, 1988. Fermi 2's electric generating capacity is nearly 1,200 megawatts at 22,000 volts, which produces about 15 percent of the power generated by Detroit Edison. Fermi 2 Facts: " Fermi 2 normally produces enough electricity to serve a city of about one million people. " Fermi 2 was the 93 rd nuclear power plant to be licensed in the United States. " Fermi 2 contains 300,000 cubic yards of concrete, 20,000 tons of steel, 1,200 miles of electric wire and 70 miles of conduit. " The plant's cooling system is a "closed system" to prevent thermal or other pollution in Lake Erie.
    [Show full text]
  • WUWM's 2019 EEO Report
    WUWM MILWAUKEE PUBLIC RADIO UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN – MILWAUKEE ANNUAL EEO PUBLIC FILE REPORT 2019 August 1, 2018 – July 31, 2019 The purpose of this EEO Public File Report is to comply with Section 73.2080(c ) (6) of the FCC’s 2002 rule on equal employment opportunities. This report has been prepared on behalf of the station and is on file, as required, in the station’s public file and on its website. The FCC’s EEO Rules require that this Report contain the following information: 1. A list of all full-time vacancies filled by the Station(s) comprising the Station Employment Unit during the Applicable Period; 2. For each such vacancy, the recruitment source(s) utilized to fill the vacancy (including, if applicable, organizations entitled to notification pursuant to Section 73.2080(c)(1)(ii) of the EEO Rules, which should be identified by name, address, contact person and telephone number; 3. The recruitment source that referred the hire for each full-time vacancy during the Applicable Period; 4. Data reflecting the total number of persons interviewed for full-time vacancies during the Applicable Period and the total number of interviewees referred by each recruitment source utilized in connection with such vacancies; and 5. A list and brief description of the initiatives undertaken pursuant to Section 73.2080(c)(2) of the FCC rules. EEO Contact Information For Unit: Ann Piatt WUWM-FM 111 East Wisconsin Avenue Milwaukee, WI 53202 Section 1 – Vacancy Information Vacancy Job Recruit Source of Number of Number from Each Recruitment Source
    [Show full text]
  • Lacrosse Box Score (Final) 2019 Cincinnati Lacrosse Detroit Mercy Vs Cincinnati (Feb 24, 2019 at Cincinnati, Ohio)
    Lacrosse Box Score (Final) 2019 Cincinnati Lacrosse Detroit Mercy vs Cincinnati (Feb 24, 2019 at Cincinnati, Ohio) Detroit Mercy (1-3) vs. Score by period 1 2 Total Cincinnati (3-2) Detroit Mercy 4 4 8 Date: Feb 24, 2019 • Attendance: 103 Cincinnati 14 4 18 Weather: low 40s (feels like mid 20s), winds 20+ mph Detroit Mercy SCORING: GOALS: Lexie Kinmond 2; Kamryn Corraro 2; Elise Harder 2; Kaitlyn Wandelt 1; Morgan Girardi 1. ASSISTS: Lexie Kinmond 1; Kaitlyn Wandelt 1. Cincinnati SCORING: GOALS: BORZILLO, Monica 6; ADAMS, Alyssa 3; GYSIN, Taylor 3; MLKVY, Sam 3; DONOVAN, Amanda 1; FESS, Amanda 1; SAINS, Jayde 1. ASSISTS: BORZILLO, Monica 3; CARNEY, Kate 2; ADAMS, Alyssa 1. Shots by period 1 2 Total Saves by period 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 12 13 25 Detroit Mercy 4 0 4 Cincinnati 24 6 30 Cincinnati 6 8 14 Ground balls/prd 1 2 Total Turnovers by prd 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 15 11 26 Detroit Mercy 12 5 17 Cincinnati 21 10 31 Cincinnati 8 10 18 F/O violations by prd 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 0 0 0 Cincinnati 0 0 0 Draw controls/prd 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 7 4 11 Cincinnati 12 5 17 Clears by period 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 5-10 5-5 10-15 Cincinnati 5-7 6-10 11-17 Extra-man opps 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 0-0 0-0 0-0 Cincinnati 1-0 1-0 2-0 Free-position shots 1 2 Total Detroit Mercy 1-4 1-3 2-7 Cincinnati 5-6 2-2 7-8 Stadium: Gettler Stadium Official's signature Penalties - Detroit Mercy 0/0:00; Cincinnati 0/0:00.
    [Show full text]
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan
    2020–2025 MICHIGAN Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Working together, we can use the next five years to redefine the role of historic preservation in the state to ensure it remains relevant to Michigan’s future. State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by 300 North Washington Square Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Lansing, Michigan 48913 Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, Martha MacFarlane-Faes, Lansing, Michigan Deputy State Historic August 2020 Preservation Officer Mark Burton, CEO, With assistance from Michigan Economic Peter Dams, Dams & Associates, Development Corporation Plainwell, Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, This report has been financed entirely State of Michigan with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 Cover photo: Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse, Alpena County. Photo: Bryan Lijewski Michigan State Historic Preservation Office 2 Preservation Plan 2020–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]