Detroit Neighborhoods

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

St Clair Shores
Warren

  • Hazel Park
  • Oak Park

Ferndale

42

Eastpointe

85

Southfield

68
43

83

97 56
93 77

Harper Woods

29
8

90 78

95
7

  • 16
  • 34

94

  • 54
  • 19

44

4
105
76

86
60
81
33
72
26
45

58
6
84

  • 69
  • 67

17
88

Hamtramck

74
89
39

Redford Twp

12
103
1
40
30

15
41
71
9
20
66

82
2
100
36
80
70

99
96
57
51
5

59
38

46
49
27
35
23

  • 32
  • 61

31
87
73
50
62

  • 3
  • 37 53

  • 102
  • 28

  • 104
  • 52

13
79

  • 98
  • 64
  • 21

55
11
18
22

101
25
65

48
63

47. Hubbard Farms 48. Hubbard Richard 49. Indian Village 50. Islandview 51. Jefferson Chalmers 52. Jeffries 53. Joseph Berry Subdivision 82. Poletown East
77. Palmer Park 78. Palmer Woods 79. Parkland 80. Petosky-Otsego 81. Pilgrim Village

47
91

19. Conant Gardens 20. Conner Creek 21. Core City

Dearborn

92

22. Corktown 23. Cultural Center 24. Delray 25. Downtown

24

54. Krainz Woods 55. Lafayette Park
83. Pulaski 84. Ravendale 85. Regent Park 86. Riverdale 87. Rivertown 88. Rosedale Park 89. Russell Woods 90. Sherwood Forest 91. Southwest Detroit 92. Springwells 93. State Fair Ground 94. The Eye 95. University District 96. Virginia Park 97. Von Steuben 98. Warrendale

Inkster

14
75

26. East English Village 56. LaSalle College Park 27. East Village 28. Eastern Market
57. LaSalle Gardens 58. Littlefield
29. Eight Mile-Wyoming 59. Marina District

Melvindale
Dearborn Heights
River Rouge

1. Arden Park 2. Art Center 3. Aviation Sub 4. Bagley 5. Barton-McFarland 6. Belmont 7. Berg Lahser 8. Blackstone Park 9. Boston Edison 10. Boynton

10

30. Eliza Howell 31. Elmwood Park 32. Fiskhorn
60. Martin Park 61. McDougall-Hunt 62. Medical Center 63. Michigan Martin 64. Midtown 65. Millenium Village 66. Milwaukee Junction 67. Minock Park 68. Mohican Regent 69. Morningside 70. New Center

Allen Park

33. Fitzgerald 34. Five Points 35. Forest Park 36. Franklin Park 37. Gold Coast 38. Grandale 39. Grandmont 40. Grandmont #1 41. Gratiot Woods 42. Green Acres 43. Greenbriar 44. Grixdale

Ecorse
Lincoln Park

Detroit

11. Briggs

Taylor

12. Brightmoor 13. Brush Park 14. Carbon Works 15. Castle Rouge 16. Chaldean Town 17. Chandler Park 18. Claytown
99. Wayne State University

  • 100. Weatherby
  • 71. North End

72. North Rosedale Park 73. NW Goldberg 74. Oakman Blvd 75. Oakwood Heights 76. Old Redford
101. West Side Industrial 102. West Village 103. Westwood Park 104. Woodbridge 105. Yorkshire Woods

Neighborhoods

Wyandotte
Southgate

45. Harmony Village 46. Herman Gardens

Miles
0

Sources: Cityscape Detroit, 2003; Data Driven Detroit, 2012.

  • 1.25
  • 2.5
  • 5

$

Recommended publications
  • Growing Detroit's African-American Middle

    Growing Detroit's African-American Middle

    v GROWING DETROIT’S AFRICAN-AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A PROSPEROUS DETROIT GROWING DETROIT’S AFRICAN-AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A PROSPEROUS DETROIT Photography Tafari Stevenson-Howard 1st Printing: February 2019 GROWING DETROIT’S AFRICAN-AMERICAN MIDDLE CLASS THE OPPORTUNITY FOR A PROSPEROUS DETROIT 4 FOREWORD Foreword There’s a simple, universal concept concerning economic, social and educational growth that must be front of mind in planning about enlarging the black middle class: Authentic development and growth require deliberate investment. If we want to see more black people enter the middle class, we must invest in endeavors and interventions that lead to better- paying jobs, affordable housing, efficient transportation and effective schools. Though these amenities will attract middle- class people back to Detroit, the focus on development must be directed at uplifting a greater percentage of current residents so that they have the necessary tools to enter the middle class. Meaning, growing the black middle class in Detroit should not result from pushing low-income people out of the city. One may think a strategy to attract people back into to the city should take priority. White and middle-class flight significantly influenced the concentrations of families who make less than $50,000 in the suburbs (30 percent) and in Detroit (75 percent), according to findings in Detroit Future City’s “139 Square Miles” report. Bringing suburbanites back into the city would alter these percentages, and we most certainly want conditions that are attractive to all middle- class families. However, we also don’t want to return to the realities where the devaluing of low-income and black people hastened the flight to the suburbs.
  • Mi0747data.Pdf

    Mi0747data.Pdf

    DETROIT'S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Milwaukee Junction HAER MI-416 Detroit Michigan WRITTEN HISTORICAL AND DESCRIPTIVE DATA FIELD RECORDS HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior 1849 C Street NW Washington, DC 20240-0001 HISTORIC AMERICAN ENGINEERING RECORD DETROIT’S MILWAUKEE JUNCTION SURVEY HAER MI-416 Location: Milwaukee Junction, Detroit, Michigan The survey boundaries are Woodward Avenue on the west and St. Aubin on the east. The southern boundary is marked by the Grand Trunk Western railroad line, which runs just south of East Baltimore from Woodward past St. Aubin. The northern boundary of the survey starts on the west end at East Grand Boulevard, runs east along the boulevard to Russell, moves north along Russell to Euclid, and extends east along Euclid to St. Aubin. Significance: The area known as Milwaukee Junction, located just north of Detroit’s city center, was a center of commercial and industrial activity for more than a century. Milwaukee Junction served, if not as the birthplace of American automobile manufacturing, then as its nursery. In addition to the Ford Motor Company and General Motors, many early auto manufacturers and their support services (especially body manufacturers like the Fisher Brothers, C.R. Wilson, and Trippensee Auto Body) were also located in the area, probably because of the proximity of the railroads. Historians: Kenneth Shepherd and Richard Sucré, 2003 Project Information: The Historic American Engineering Record conducted a survey of Detroit’s Milwaukee Junction, a center of auto and related industrial production, in summer 2003. The City of Detroit and the city’s Historic Designation Advisory Board sponsored the survey.
  • The Detroit Housing Market Challenges and Innovations for a Path Forward

    The Detroit Housing Market Challenges and Innovations for a Path Forward

    POLICYADVISORY GROUP RESEARCH REPORT The Detroit Housing Market Challenges and Innovations for a Path Forward Erika C. Poethig Joseph Schilling Laurie Goodman Bing Bai James Gastner Rolf Pendall Sameera Fazili March 2017 ABOUT THE URBAN INSTITUTE The nonprofit Urban Institute is dedicated to elevating the debate on social and economic policy. For nearly five decades, Urban scholars have conducted research and offered evidence-based solutions that improve lives and strengthen communities across a rapidly urbanizing world. Their objective research helps expand opportunities for all, reduce hardship among the most vulnerable, and strengthen the effectiveness of the public sector. Copyright © March 2017. Urban Institute. Permission is granted for reproduction of this file, with attribution to the Urban Institute. Cover image by Tim Meko. Contents Acknowledgments iv Sustaining a Healthy Housing Market 1 Demand 1 Supply 10 Credit Access 23 What’s Next? 31 Innovations for a Path Forward 32 Foreclosed Inventory Repositioning 34 Home Equity Protection 38 Land Bank Programs 40 Lease-Purchase Agreements 47 Shared Equity Homeownership 51 Targeted Mortgage Loan Products 55 Rental Housing Preservation 59 Targeting Resources 60 Capacity 62 Translating Ideas into Action 64 Core Principles for Supporting Housing Policies and Programs in Detroit 64 A Call for a Collaborative Forum on Housing: The Detroit Housing Compact 66 Notes 70 References 74 The Urban Institute's Collaboration with JPMorgan Chase 76 Statement of Independence 77 Acknowledgments This report was funded by a grant from JPMorgan Chase. We are grateful to them and to all our funders, who make it possible for Urban to advance its mission. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to the Urban Institute, its trustees, or its funders.
  • Research Paper

    Research Paper

    Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Parliamentary Library & Information Service Department of Parliamentary Services Parliament of Victoria Research Paper Detroit: What Lessons for Victoria from a ‘Post-Industrial’ City? No. 2, December 2015 Tom Barnes Research Fellow, Parliamentary Library & Information Service Institute for Religion, Politics and Society Australian Catholic University Level 6, 215 Spring St, Melbourne VIC 3000 [email protected] ISSN 2204-4752 (Print) 2204-4760 (Online) © 2015 Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Parliament of Victoria Research Papers produced by the Parliamentary Library & Information Service, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria are released under a Creative Commons 3.0 Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence. By using this Creative Commons licence, you are free to share - to copy, distribute and transmit the work under the following conditions: . Attribution - You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work). Non-Commercial - You may not use this work for commercial purposes without our permission. No Derivative Works - You may not alter, transform, or build upon this work without our permission. The Creative Commons licence only applies to publications produced by the Library, Department of Parliamentary Services, Parliament of Victoria. All other material produced by the Parliament
  • Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan

    Michigan Statewide Historic Preservation Plan

    2020–2025 MICHIGAN Statewide Historic Preservation Plan Working together, we can use the next five years to redefine the role of historic preservation in the state to ensure it remains relevant to Michigan’s future. State Historic Preservation Office Prepared by 300 North Washington Square Amy L. Arnold, Preservation Planner, Lansing, Michigan 48913 Michigan State Historic Preservation Office, Martha MacFarlane-Faes, Lansing, Michigan Deputy State Historic August 2020 Preservation Officer Mark Burton, CEO, With assistance from Michigan Economic Peter Dams, Dams & Associates, Development Corporation Plainwell, Michigan Gretchen Whitmer, Governor, This report has been financed entirely State of Michigan with federal funds from the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of the Interior. This program receives federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or you desire further information, please write to: Office for Equal Opportunity National Park Service 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20240 Cover photo: Thunder Bay Island Lighthouse, Alpena County. Photo: Bryan Lijewski Michigan State Historic Preservation Office 2 Preservation Plan 2020–2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .....................................................................................................................................
  • Metro Park Events

    Metro Park Events

    Relevar Metro Detroit Events Calendar: December-January Home Sporting Events Dec 8 vs. New York Islanders Dec 10 vs. Los Angeles Kings Dec 14 vs. Ottawa Senators Dec 22 vs. Florida Panthers Jan 2 vs. Calgary Flames Jan 4 vs. Nashville Predators Jan 6 vs. Washington Capitals Jan 8 vs. Montreal Canadians Jan 15 vs. Anaheim Ducks Featured Events & Shows by Venue ANDIAMO CELEBRITY SHOWROOM http://andiamoitalia.com/showroom/ DETROIT PISTONS – LITTLE Dec 6-7 The Scintas Holiday Show CEASAR ARENA Dec 8 Aaron Caruso Holiday Show http://littlecaesars.arenadetroit.com/ CANTON VILLAGE THEATRE Dec 1 vs. Golden State Warriors www.cantonvillagetheater.org Dec 3 vs. Oklahoma City Thunder Dec 7 vs. Philadelphia 76ers Dec 6-8 Detroit All Star Band Showcase Dec 9 vs. New Orleans Pelicans Dec 8 Marking Spirits Bright Dec 15 vs. Boston Celtics Dec 20 New Adventures of Tale to Tale Dec 17 vs. Milwaukee Bucks Jan 11-12 Our Town: Plymouth Christian Dec 23 vs. Atlanta Hawks Academy Dec 26 vs. Washington Wizards Jan 19 Aeolus Quartets and Franklin Jan 5 vs. Utah Jazz Cohen; Chamber of Music Jan 7 vs. San Antonio Spurs Society Jan 16 vs. Orlando Magic Jan 21 Canton Celebrates: Martin Jan 18 vs. Miami Heat Luther King Jr. Jan 19 vs. Sacramento Kings Jan 29 vs. Milwaukee Bucks Jan 31 vs. Dallas Mavericks COBO CENTER https://www.cobocenter.com/ DETROIT RED WINGS - LITTLE Dec 2 The Wild Dance Intensive CEASAR ARENA Dec 7 Adopt A Child- Christmas http://littlecaesars.arenadetroit.com/ Program Dec 13 White Tie Black Gown Dec 2 vs.
  • Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) Grants for 5 Active Or Completed Projects

    Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) Grants for 5 Active Or Completed Projects

    The COUNTY ALCONA MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND was established under the Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund Act of 1976 to provide a permanent funding source for the public acquisition of land for resource protection and public outdoor recreation. Funding is provided by revenue derived from royalties on the sale and lease of state-owned oil, gas and mineral rights. This landmark piece of legislation came to fruition thanks to the collaborative efforts of the Michigan Oil and Gas Association, Michigan United Conservation Clubs and state legislators on behalf of all Michigan citizens. The MNRTF has contributed immeasurably to protecting our state’s natural beauty and helped paved the way for wise and prudent development of our state’s abundant energy resources. To date, the MNRTF has awarded over $1.1 billion in grants to Michigan’s state and local parks, waterways, trails and nature preserves throughout all 83 counties. Of this total, $245 million has been invested in trails. In excess of 1,000 public parks have been acquired and / or developed. Other projects funded include ball fields, tennis courts, trailheads, restrooms and other amenities, for a total of just under 2,500 MNRTF-assisted projects since 1976. ALCONA COUNTY Alcona County has received $644,100 in Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF) grants for 5 active or completed projects. Alcona County Active or Completed MNRTF projects ALCONA TOWNSHIP • Park Improvements: $108,700 CALEDONIA TOWNSHIP • Hubbard Lake North End Park Development: $245,400 DNR – PARKS & RECREATION DIVISION • South Bay-Hubbard Lake: $145,000 DNR – WILDLIFE DIVISION • Hubbard Lake Wetlands: $130,000 VILLAGE OF LINCOLN • Brownlee Lake Boat Launch: $15,000 ALGER COUNTY ALGER The MICHIGAN NATURAL RESOURCES TRUST FUND was established under the Kammer Recreational Land Trust Fund Act of 1976 to provide a permanent funding source for the public acquisition of land for resource protection and public outdoor recreation.
  • Palmer Woods Centennial Gala

    Palmer Woods Centennial Gala

    CELEBRATE! PALMER WOODS CENTENNIAL GALA Detroit Golf Club Saturday, September 19, 2015 Palmer Woods Centennial Logos s part of the Palmer Woods 100-Year Celebration, the Palmer Woods Centennial Committee sponsored a design competition to create a new visual logo for the Aneighborhood’s Centennial year. Artists were invited to submit their vision for a Centennial logo. The following artists submitted the winning logos: PHIL LEWIS – 1st Place Winner The winning logo was conceived by Phil Lewis, a lifelong Detroiter, Cass Tech graduate and recipient of a BFA from the Center for Creative Studies majoring in Illustration. “My mother used to say I was born with a paintbrush in my hand. Drawing was an escape for me,” remarks Phil. His natural ability was honed at Cass Tech under the tutelage of well known teachers such as Dr. Cledie Taylor, Marian Stephens and Irving Berg. Entering the contest to design a logo in celebration of the Palmer Woods Centennial was an easy decision for Phil. He loves the city of Detroit and considers Palmer Woods one of Detroit’s jewels. Even though he does not live in the neighborhood, he is good friends with residents and very aware of the community. Phil’s logo design was inspired by the beauty, history and character of the homes. Consequently, his logo effectively captures the spirit of our strong and beautiful community. Currently Phil is the owner of Phil Lewis Studio and a Digital Content Artist for MRM McCann Advertising. As the winning artist for the neighborhood contest, Phil’s logo is featured on banners that are be placed on light posts within and along the perimeter of the neighborhood.
  • Living and Investing in The

    Living and Investing in The

    DETROIT BUSINESS MAIN 08-11-08 B 49 CDB 8/6/2008 12:58 PM Page 1 www.crainsdetroit.com Vol. 24, No. 32a Fall 2008 www.crainsdetroit.com Living and investing in the FillingD in the gaps ■ Catalysts for ■ Selling ■ New Detroit: mass neighborhood restaurants in transit, urban buying power Midtown, farming Corktown CDBmagazine.qxp 7/16/2008 11:08 AM Page 1 Together, we can change the future. All it takes is working harder — and smarter. Bank of America is proud to support Crain’s House Party for reaching out and making this community a better place for all of us. Visit us at www.bankofamerica.com. Bank of America, N.A. Member FDIC. Equal Housing Lender ~ © 2008 Bank of America Corporation. All rights reserved. SPN-71 DETROIT BUSINESS MAIN 08-11-08 B 1 CDB 8/6/2008 5:44 PM Page 1 Living and Investing intheD Vol. 24, No. 32a ON THE COVER: Table of Contents Counterclockwise from top left: Book Cadillac Mary Kramer building; Justin Mooter, Optimism amid turmoil. Detroit is making progress, Royal Container Inc. but it needs to fill its political leadership gap. Page 2. general manager and downtown renter; RiverWalk; Cindy The Corridors Warner, managing A development report from Woodward, Michigan and Gratiot partner of Northpointe avenues, and Detroit’s Page 8 Food Ventures, parent riverfront: new lofts, company of Zaccaro’s restaurants and collaborative Market. projects. Page 4. ABOUT THIS The Catalysts ISSUE: Tipping-point Detroit initiatives: urban farming, the Living and Investing Dequindre Cut recreation in the D was edited path, new retail and mass by Assistant transit.
  • Quarterly Report

    Quarterly Report

    Inventory Department 1 The Inventory Department is responsible for the management of all properties while in Land Bank ownership. This includes the acquisitions of property by the DLBA, whether from private or public sources, as well as the physical maintenance of the property. The Inventory Department is responsible for the assessment and placement of inventory into “pipelines” including Demolition, Legal (Quiet Title), and Dispositions sales programs. The Inventory Department supports DLBA programs with data analysis and ability to sort and map all properties by type, location, condition and other factors. It also provides assistance to the City’s economic development efforts. Future Inventory programs may include data analysis and support to the City for land assembly, whether for Blue/Green Infrastructure projects for storm water management, economic development, or another use. Inventory Management As of 01/06/2017, DLBA holds title to 93,195 parcels. Residential Vacant Commercial and Industrial Grand Structures Land Structures Total In HHF 15,833 43,992 258 60,083 Outside HHF 10,772 22,285 55 33,112 Grand Total 26,899 66,277 313 93,195 The Inventory Department continues to receive and respond to many property maintenance requests, including weak and/or dead trees, overgrown lawns, and unsecured houses. As always, we are balancing the immense amount of requests with our current resources to handle as many resident concerns as possible. The Detroit Land Bank Authority is preparing a Tree Removal RFQ to manage the removal and cleanup of dead trees on DLBA properties. The Detroit Land Bank Authority will be reissuing the Property Maintenance and Preservation Professionals RFQ during the first half of 2017.
  • Pdf Annual Report 2008

    Pdf Annual Report 2008

    2008 Annual Report FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2008 WWW.GCFB.ORG 1 • AnnuAl RepoRt 2008 FINANCIAL SUMMARY REVENUE 2007–08 2006–07 1.5% Agency Shared Maintenance 4.3% Grants .9% United Way Donated Food $32,542,497 $29,463,291 2% Other Cash Donations $5,190,846 $4,415,089 Donated Food (73.0%) Purchased Food Reimbursement $2,982,506 $2,498,754 Cash Donations (11.6%) Grants $1,912,694 $866,148 Purchased Food Reimbursement (6.7%) Other $872,167 $570,289 DonatedGrants (4.3%) Food (73.0%) Agency Shared Maintenance $667,006 $776,885 CashOther Donations (2.0%) (11.6%) United Way $395,510 $418,809 PurchasedAgency Shared Food MaintenanceReimbursement (1.5%) (6.7%) 73% Donated Food Grants (4.3%) Investment Income $23,863 $79,210 United Way (.9%) OtherInvestment (2.0%) Income (.1%) TOTAL REVENUE $44,587,089 $39,088,475 11.6% Cash Donations Agency Shared Maintenance (1.5%) 6.7% Purchased Food Reimbursement United Way (.9%) Investment Income (.1%) .9% Management EXPENSES 3.9% Fund Raising Distributed Food $35,985,479 $32,581,602 13.6% Program Services Distributed Food (81.6%) Program Services $5,976,566 $5,375,120 Program Services (13.6%) Fund Raising $1,732,720 $1,351,102 Fund Raising (3.9%) Distributed Food (81.6%) Management $410,941 $387,310 Management (.9%) Program Services (13.6%) TOTAL EXPENSES $44,105,706 $39,695,134 Fund Raising (3.9%) 81.6% Distributed Food Management (.9%) EXCESS REVENUE OVER EXPENSES $481,383 -$606,659 2007–08 2006–07 Meals Distributed 20,128,420 19,106,374 Meals per day 55,146 52,346 Meals per week 387,085 367,430 Meals per month 1,677,368 1,592,198 Efficiency 95% for Feeding Hungry Neighbors WWW.GCFB.ORG ANNUAL REPORT 2008 • 2 MESSAGE FROM THE BOARD CHAIR hank you for your efforts to feed our hungry neighbors, 1.5% Agency Shared Maintenance especially during this last year of economic hardship T for southeast Michigan.
  • Author Report No Pub Type Edrs Price

    Author Report No Pub Type Edrs Price

    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 351 983 HE 026 050 AUTHOR Kroe, Elaine TITLE Basic Student Charges at Postsecondary Institutions: Academic Year 1991-92. Tuition and Required Fees and Room and Board Charges at 4-Year, 2-Year, and Public Less-Than-2-Year Institutions. Statistical Analysis Report. INSTITUTION National Center for Education Statistics (ED), Washington, DC. REPORT NO ISBN-0-16-038237-8; NCES-92-156 PUB DATE Nov 92 NOTE 154p. AVAILABLE FROMU.S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Mail Stop: SSOP, Washington, DC 20402-9328. PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Colleges; College Students; *Community Colleges; Comparative Analysis; Degrees (Academic); *Fees; Graduate Study; Higher Education; Postsecondary Education; Private Colleges; Public Colleges; Statistical Data; *Student Costs; *Tuition; Undergraduate Study; *Universities ABSTRACT This report lists in tabular form the typical tuition and required fees and room and board charges for academic year 1991-92 at nearly 4,900 4-year, 2-year, and public less-than-2-year postsecondary institutions (collegiate and non-collegiate) in the United States and its outlying areas. Separate figures are given for tuition and f,e charges to in-state and out-of-state students at the undergraduate and graduate levels, along with the costs for room and board, and the number of meals per week covered by the board charge. The report opens with national statistics on tuition and required fees at postsecondary institutions for academic year 1991-92. These data are followed by tuition and required fees and room and board charges at individual institutions. Tables list public and private 4-year institutions offering a bachelor's degree or higher award; public and private 2-year institutions offering a postsecondary award of at least 2 but not less than 4 academic years; and public less-than-2-year institutions offering a postsecondary award of less than 2 academic years.